combating youth unemployment : the european perspective and policy response middlesex university...
TRANSCRIPT
Combating Youth Unemployment : The European Perspective and Policy Response
Middlesex University London 13 November 2015
Eamonn Davern European Commission Employment Strategy Unit
How Serious is the Youth Unemployment Problem?
•
• 5 million under 25 year olds unemployed
• 21.4% Youth Unemployment
• 44 ppt gap between lowest and highest countries
(EUROSTAT Dec 2014)
Macro-Economic Youth Unemployment Factors
• • More sensitive to economic cycle• • Young less experienced - more prone to lay offs• • Concentrated in vulnerable sectors • • More likely on short term contracts• • 50% changes in Youth Unemployment cyclical• • Structural changes can be positive , investment
in ALMP,education,training/education
NEETS in Europe
• 7.5 million NEETS (aged 15-24) EU 28
• NEETS aged 15-29 13% (2008) to 15.4% (2014)
(EUROSTAT Dec 2014)
Significant Differences across EU NEETs rate aged 15-29 years
• Greece 26.7% Luxembourg 6.5%• Italy 26.2% Denmark 7.3% • Bulgaria 24% Netherlands 7.6%• Spain 20.7% Germany 8.7%
• United Kingdom 13.4% (10th In EU 28)
(EUROSTAT Dec 2014)
European Policy Context (1)
• NEET most problematic youth unemployment issue
• • Europe (2020) Initiative Youth on the Move • • 2012-2013 Youth Opportunities Initiative• • To provide pathways back into education/training and
establish labour market contact
•
European Policy Context (2)
• European Commission Employment Package • Towards a Job Rich Recovery (2012)
• Stressed importance of decreasing NEET rates by enabling transitions to work.
• New indicator introduced to monitor NEET situation (from 2014 part of joint employment report scorecard)
European NEETS Heteregenous Population
• Largest sub-group Conventionally Unemployed
• Other NEETs
• • Sick and disabled• • Young Carers• • Non-vulnerable NEETS
Young people at greatest risk of becomong NEET
• • Low levels of education• • Migrant background• • Disability and health problems• • Family issues
Social and Economic cost of inactivity
• 2011 economic loss (benefits paid – lost output) from youth labour market disengagement Euro 153 billion (1.2% European GDP)
• Loss exceeds 2% in Bg Cy Hu Ire It Ltv Pl
• Much greater social disengaement• (Eurofund Report 2011)•
Adverse Consequences for Individual NEETs
• • Disaffection• • Insecure future employment• • Higher rates of youth offending• • Mental and physical health problems
The Youth Guarantee
• Commission Proposal December 2012
• Adopted by Council of Ministers 22 April 2013
• Endorsed by European Council June 2013
• G20 Melbourne September 2014 called for more action on youth unemployment
Youth Guarantee Policy Intention
• Structural reform to improve school to work transitions and measure to immediately support jobs for young people
• Based on successful experience in Finland and Austria
•
Youth Guarantee Commitment
• Within 4 months of leaving school or losing job young people under 25 receive either:
• • good quality job suiting their education, skills, and experience,
• • aquire education, skills and experience required to find a job in the future through apprenticeship, traineeship, or continued education
Youth Guarantee Implementation
• All Member States have presented Youth Guarantee Implementation Plans
• Plans and implementation assessed as part of European Semester (EU re-enforced economic surveillance framework)
• Employment Ministers endorsed Youth Guarantee Indicator/Monitoring framework December 2014 .
Required Supply Side reforms in Member States
• Structural reforms needed include improved :• • ALMP • • Training• • Job – Search• • Education – including combatting early leaving • • Outreach • • Quality and quantity of aprenticeships and VET • • CSRs in 2014 for 8 EU Member States • • PES Reform , co-operation decision May 2014 •
Identification and Activation of NEETs
• Tools and Strategies involving all who have access to unregistered young people
• Key actors include : Social Services, Education Providers , Youth Associations
Youth Guarantee boost for demand for young labour
• Temporary well targeted wage and recruitment subsidies
• Apprenticeship and traineeship grants
• Business development support :• • European Structural and Investment Funds and •
European Investment Bank• • COSME Programme
Social Investment in Youth Employment
• • Youth Guarantee high priority in Partnership Agreements setting Strategic Framework for Structural and Investment Funds 2014-2020
• • Euro 86 billion ESF (Youth Employment measures including Guarantee)
• • Supplementary support from Youth Employment Initiative Euro 6.4 billion (targets NEETS – regions exceeding 25% Youth Unemployment (20 MS) eligible
Further Initiatives complementing Youth Guarantee
• Quality Framework for Traineeships (adopted by Council of Ministers March 2014)
• European Alliance for Apprenticeships launched July 2013
Key Policy Messages
• • Diverse menu of instruments needed• • Labour market readiness of beneficiaries must be
considered• • Young people need long –term sustainable pathway• • Involving range of stakeholders in design is essential• • Client centred not provider focussed measures
needed• • Success depends upon innovation
Thank you for your attention
• Questions ?