columbia sportswear v. fibretronic limited
DESCRIPTION
Columbia Sportswear v. Fibretonic LimitedTRANSCRIPT
{SSBLS Main Documents\7474\018\00407377-1 }
STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 S.W. OAK STREET, SUITE 500
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 TEL. (503) 227-1600 FAX (503) 227-6840
Page 1 - COMPLAINT
Keith A. Ketterling, OSB No. 913368 Email: [email protected] Steven C. Berman, OSB No. 951769 Email: [email protected] STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 S.W. Oak Street, Suite 500 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 227-1600 Facsimile: (503) 227-6840 Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. FIBRETRONIC LIMITED, a Hong Kong corporation, Defendant.
Case No. 3:13-cv-1636 COMPLAINT (Breach of Contract) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiff, Columbia Sportswear Company alleges as follows:
PARTIES
1.
Columbia Sportswear Company (“Columbia”) is an Oregon corporation with its principal
place of business in Washington County, Oregon.
2.
Defendant Fibretronic Limited (“Fibretronic”) is a Hong Kong corporation, with its
principal place of business in Hong Kong.
Case 3:13-cv-01636-PK Document 1 Filed 09/16/13 Page 1 of 4 Page ID#: 1
{SSBLS Main Documents\7474\018\00407377-1 }
STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 S.W. OAK STREET, SUITE 500
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 TEL. (503) 227-1600 FAX (503) 227-6840
Page 2 - COMPLAINT
VENUE AND JURISDICTION
3.
The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because this is a
civil action between a citizen of a state and a citizen or subject of a foreign state, and the amount
in controversy exceeds $75,000.
4.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Fibretronic because Fibretronic directed its
activities towards Oregon, consummated commercial transactions with this forum and
purposefully availed itself of conducting business with this forum. The dispute between
Fibretronic and Columbia arises out of and relates to Fibretronic’s business activities within this
forum and its direct contact with Columbia in Oregon. Fibretronic has engaged in acts or
omissions that have caused injury in Oregon. Fibretronic has distributed products used or
consumed within the State of Oregon in the ordinary course of trade, or has otherwise made or
established contacts with the State of Oregon sufficient to permit exercise of personal
jurisdiction.
5.
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1), because Fibretronic is a
“resident” of Oregon, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(2) and §1391(c)(3).
Alternatively, venue is proper in this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(3).
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Breach of Contract)
6.
Fibretronic entered into a contract with Columbia. Under that agreement, Fibretronic
agreed to manufacture and provide heating components for the inner wrist cuff (or “gluff”) for
heated jackets Columbia intended to market and sell worldwide.
Case 3:13-cv-01636-PK Document 1 Filed 09/16/13 Page 2 of 4 Page ID#: 2
{SSBLS Main Documents\7474\018\00407377-1 }
STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 S.W. OAK STREET, SUITE 500
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 TEL. (503) 227-1600 FAX (503) 227-6840
Page 3 - COMPLAINT
7.
Between May 2012 and September 2012, Columbia paid Fibretronic approximately
$950,000 for the heating components. The heating components subsequently were installed into
the inner wrist cuffs of the heated jackets, and the jackets were distributed worldwide for sale.
8.
By November 2012, Columbia discovered that the heating components in some of the
jackets were faulty. The wires in the cuffs were not properly aligned, which could result in an
electrical short. The short created a hot spot that melted fabric in the jacket.
9.
The heating components provided by Fibretronic were not fit for the purposes for which
they were obtained. Because of the faulty heating components, the jackets were not appropriate
for sale. Columbia recalled the jackets and withdrew them from the market.
10.
As a result of Fibretronic’s actions and breach of contract, Columbia has sustained
damages of approximately $9.4 million dollars.
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
11.
Columbia demands a trial by jury.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
12.
WHEREFORE, Columbia prays for the following relief:
A. Damages of $9.4 million, or in an amount proven at trial;
B. Its attorneys’ fees and costs incurred herein; and
Case 3:13-cv-01636-PK Document 1 Filed 09/16/13 Page 3 of 4 Page ID#: 3
{SSBLS Main Documents\7474\018\00407377-1 }
STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 S.W. OAK STREET, SUITE 500
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 TEL. (503) 227-1600 FAX (503) 227-6840
Page 4 - COMPLAINT
C. All other legal and equitable relief to which Columbia is entitled.
DATED this 16th day of September, 2013
STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. By: /s/ Keith A. Ketterling
Keith A. Ketterling, OSB No. 913368 Steven C. Berman, OSB No. 951769
209 SW Oak Street, Suite 500 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 227-1600 Facsimile: (503) 227-6840 Email: [email protected]
[email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff
Case 3:13-cv-01636-PK Document 1 Filed 09/16/13 Page 4 of 4 Page ID#: 4