colluvium versus alluvium - usda

38
Colluvium Versus Alluvium: Preliminary Survey Results Bradley Miller Jérôme Juilleret

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jan-2022

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Colluvium Versus Alluvium:Preliminary Survey Results

Bradley Miller Jérôme Juilleret

Page 2: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Survey Goals

• Identify if variation exists in definitions used by practicing scientists

• If variation exists, ‘map’ the different definitions to assist translation and understanding

• Look for common ground or potential paths forward

Page 3: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

The Purpose of Classification

• Improve understanding• Improve communication

Page 4: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Demographics

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

High School B.S. M.S. Ph.D. Ph.D. +

Level of Education

14.4%

19.2%

63.5%

3.0%

Work Sector

Private Government Academia None of the above

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

High School B.S. M.S. Ph.D. Ph.D. +

Level of Education

12.6%

16.2%

66.7%

4.5%

Work Sector

Private Government Academia None of the above

USA (111 respondents) Europe (110 respondents)

Page 5: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Primary Research Discipline

16%

48%8%

19%

9%

USA

Geology Geomorphology Physical Geography Soil Science Other

12%

31%

11%

36%

10%

Europe

Geology Geomorphology Physical Geography Soil Science Other

Page 6: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Field CriteriaDo the definitions for colluvium and alluvium need to be based exclusively on field identifiable criteria?

USA Europe

49.8% 50.2%

Yes No

55.9%44.1%

Yes No

Page 7: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Colluvium Transport Processes: USA

83.0%

8.1%8.9%

Rapid Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

85.6%

6.3%8.1%

Slow Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

49.8%26.0%

24.2%

Sheet or Overland Flow

Yes No Maybe

22.6%

45.9%

31.5%

Rills and Ephemeral Gullies

Yes No Maybe

15.5%

63.5%

21.0%

Permanent Gulliesand Ravines

Yes No Maybe

35.1%

37.3%

27.7%

Debris or Mud Flow

Yes No Maybe

5.6%

85.2%

9.3%

Floodplains, Terraces, and Wadi

Yes No Maybe

3.7%

92.3%

4.1%

Permanent Running Water

Yes No Maybe

Page 8: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Colluvium Transport Processes: Europe

72.1%14.4%

13.5%

Rapid Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

79.3%

9.0%

11.7%

Slow Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

58.6%21.6%

19.8%

Sheet orOverland Flow

Yes No Maybe

31.5%

36.0%

32.4%

Rills and Ephemeral Gullies

Yes No Maybe

20.7%

52.3%

27.0%

Permanent Gulliesand Ravines

Yes No Maybe

38.7%

31.5%

29.7%

Debris or Mud Flow

Yes No Maybe

7.3%

80.0%

12.7%

Floodplains, Terraces, and Wadi

Yes No Maybe

3.6%

91.9%

4.5%

Permanent Running Water

Yes No Maybe

Page 9: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Alluvium Transport Processes: USA

5.6%

91.1%

3.3%

Rapid Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

5.9%

86.7%

7.4%

Slow Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

37.9%

37.5%

24.5%

Sheet or Overland Flow

Yes No Maybe

51.7%21.6%

26.8%

Rills and Ephemeral Gullies

Yes No Maybe

70.7%14.4%

14.8%

Permanent Gulliesand Ravines

Yes No Maybe

48.9%24.1%

27.0%

Debris or Mud Flow

Yes No Maybe

92.9%

3.3% 3.7%

Floodplains, Terraces, and Wadi

Yes No Maybe

92.2%

6.3% 1.5%

Permanent Running Water

Yes No Maybe

Page 10: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Alluvium Transport Processes: Europe

1.8%

93.7%

4.5%

Rapid Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

2.7%

91.0%

6.3%

Slow Mass Movement

Yes No Maybe

27.0%

52.3%

20.7%

Sheet or Overland Flow

Yes No Maybe

41.4%

36.0%

22.5%

Rills and Ephemeral Gullies

Yes No Maybe

61.3%24.3%

14.4%

Permanent Gulliesand Ravines

Yes No Maybe

43.2%

28.8%

27.9%

Debris or Mud Flow

Yes No Maybe

92.7%

3.6% 3.6%

Floodplains, Terraces, and Wadi

Yes No Maybe

91.9%

7.2% 0.9%

Permanent Running Water

Yes No Maybe

Page 11: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Differentiating Deposit MaterialsPlease rank the importance of the following diagnostic criteria that you would use to differentiate these two deposits/parent materials.

• Distance Traveled (COLLUVIUM = short distance, ALLUVIUM = long distance)

• Connection to Stream (COLLUVIUM = Strahler Order 1, ALLUVIUM = Strahler Order 2 or greater)

• Landscape Position (COLLUVIUM = hillslopes, ALLUVIUM = river valleys)

• Degree of Sorting (COLLUVIUM = poorly sorted, ALLUVIUM = well sorted)

• Shaping of Particles (COLLUVIUM = angular, ALLUVIUM = rounded)

• Stratification (i.e. layering)(COLLUVIUM = rare and chaotic, ALLUVIUM = common and clear)

• Lithology (COLLUVIUM = matches upslope material, ALLUVIUM = differs from upslope material)

Page 12: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Criteria for Differentiating: USAPlease rank the importance of the following diagnostic criteria that you would use to differentiate these two deposits/parent materials.

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Distance Traveled

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Connection to Stream

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Landscape Position

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Degree of Sorting

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Shaping of Particles

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Stratification

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Lithology

47% 60% 93%

79% 69% 69% 53%

Page 13: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Criteria for Differentiating: EuropePlease rank the importance of the following diagnostic criteria that you would use to differentiate these two deposits/parent materials.

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Distance Traveled

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Connection to Stream

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Landscape Position

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Degree of Sorting

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Shaping of Particles

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Stratification

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Lithology

56% 54% 92%

76% 72% 60% 64%

Page 14: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

78.4%

1.8%

2.7%17.1%

Image: Randy Schaetzl

USA

Europe

84.0%

0.7%2.6%

12.6%

Page 15: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

63.1%9.9%

7.2%

19.8%

USA

Europe

64.3%10.4%

6.7%

18.6%

Page 16: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Randy Schaetzl

0.9%

57.7%

11.7%

29.7%

USA

Europe1.5%

68.0%

8.2%

22.3%

Page 17: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

7.2%

63.1%

5.4%

24.3%

USA

Europe

11.6%

53.6%3.7%

31.1%

Page 18: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Lee Burras

26.9%

31.5%

17.6%

24.1%

USA

Europe

35.5%

21.9%

12.5%

30.2%

Page 19: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Lee Burras

50.0%

15.5%

10.9%

23.6%

USA

Europe

62.5%11.2%

7.8%

18.6%

Page 20: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Feedback from Survey

“I like to see the final results of the survey, it is always a "hot" topic among geomorphologists. I had fun take part in the survey.”

“bravo pour l'enquête”

“Good idea this survey, and very good diffusion in a large community. Could help with other terms.”

“a majority cannot claim a mandate”

“Doing this is a great idea!”

Page 21: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Feedback from SurveyAdded complications/opportunities:• Russians have:

• Alluvium - Sediments deposited by permanent water flows in river valleys

• Deluvium - Deposits resulting from the accumulation of sediments eroded from the slopes by rain and snowmelt

• Proluvium - Deposits of sediments by temporary water streams

• Colluvium - Weathering products shifted down the slope under the influence of gravity

Page 22: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Literature Contains a Variety of Definitions• Colluvium is poorly sorted debris that has accumulated at the base of

slopes, in depressions, or along small streams through gravity, soil creep, and local wash. It consists largely of material that has rolled, slid or fallen down the slope under the influence of gravity. Accumulations of rock fragments are called talus. The rock fragments in colluvium are usually angular, in contrast to the rounded, water-worn cobbles and stones in alluvium and glacial outwash. (USA Soil Survey Staff, 1993)

• Alluvium - Sediments deposited by running water of streams and rivers. It may occur on terraces well above present streams, on the present flood plains or deltas, or as a fan at the base of a slope. (Soil Science Society of America, 2008)

Page 23: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Your Feedback?

Page 24: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Next Steps

• A lot of sorting and analysis to absorb the information

• Round 2• Identify potential strategies for

addressing/consolidating different perspectives and needs

• Share results with survey participants• Use a follow-up survey to gauge community

interest in any of the unifying strategies

Page 25: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Literature Contains a Variety of Definitions• Colluvium

• Unconsolidated material at the bottom of a cliff or slope, generally moved by gravity alone. It lacks stratification and is usually unsorted: its composition depends upon its rock source, and its fragments range greatly in size. Such deposits include debris and talus. (Lapidus, 1990)

• Detritus, transported by various processes, that is still adjacent to or on its source hillslope. (Pederson, 2000)

• Sediments deposited due to anthropogenic induced soil erosion, caused by settling, clearing, mining, grazing, and/or farming. (Leopold, 2003)

• (from Latin: co-, with, and alluvium). Footslope deposit. Relatively thin and made of elements which have undergone low transportation compared to alluvium. (Foucault et al, 2014)

Page 26: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Literature Contains a Variety of Definitions• Alluvium

• Alluvium or Alluvion (from Latin, “an inundation”) is a term which in the English language, has no very definite meaning. Some authors use it to designate all rocks which have been formed by causes now acting on the surface of the earth, including those of volcanic origin; while others, adhering to the literal meaning of the original term, confine its application to deposits, whatever be their character, that have resulted from inundation… The term has been badly selected, but is used in its proper application to designate all those deposits recently formed, or now forming, by the agency of water, whether from an interrupted and constant stream, or from casual inundation. (Cuthbert, 1842)

Page 27: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Literature Contains a Variety of Definitions• Alluvium

• The general term for detrital made by rivers or streams or found on alluvial fans, flood plains, etc. Alluvium consists of gravel, sand, silt, and clay and often contains organic matter that makes it a fertile soil. It does not include the subaqueous sediments of lakes and seas. (Lapidus, 1990)

• Materials deposited on the land surface from transport by flowing water confined to a channel or valley floor (Eggleton, 2001)

• Alluvium deposited by unconcentrated surface runoff or sheet erosion, usually at the base of a slope (Neuendorf, 2005)

• (from Latin: alluvio, overflow). Sediments of rivers and lakes composed, according to the regions crossed and the strength of the current, of pebbles, gravels, sand, silt and clay and usually found in lenticular (channel) deposits. (Foucault et al, 2014)

Page 28: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented within the blue outline?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

0.9%

80.2%

4.5%

14.4%

USA

Europe1.5%

85.2%

2.6%10.7%

Page 29: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented within the blue outline?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

71.8%

5.5%

8.2%

14.5%

USA

Europe

81.8%

4.1%4.8%9.3%

Page 30: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented within the blue outline?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

35.5%

19.1%8.2%

37.3%

USA

Europe

46.5%

14.9%4.8%

33.8%

Page 31: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented within the blue outline?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

80.9%

2.7%2.7%13.6%

USA

Europe

88.5%

1.1%3.3%

7.1%

Page 32: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

2.7%

45.9%

22.5%

28.8%

USA

Europe

3.3%

50.7%18.9%

27.0%

Page 33: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Jérôme Juilleret

12.8%

25.7%

19.3%

42.2%

USA

Europe

15.3%

28.7%

10.1%

45.9%

Page 34: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Lee Burras

4.6%

25.9%

10.2%

59.3%

USA

Europe

2.2%

32.2%

13.1%

52.4%

Page 35: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented in this picture?

Image: Lee Burras

24.3%

16.2%

10.8%

48.6%

USA

Europe

25.6%

10.0%

12.2%

52.2%

Page 36: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented within the blue outline?

Image: Lee Burras

22.5%

4.5%

9.0%64.0%

USA

Europe

29.3%

3.0%9.6%

58.1%

Page 37: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Which material is MOST represented within the blue outline?

Image: Lee Burras

2.7%

39.1%

10.0%

48.2%

USA

Europe

1.9%

46.1%12.0%

40.1%

Page 38: Colluvium Versus Alluvium - USDA

Feedback from SurveyAdded complications/opportunities:• Glacis – hillslope sediments transported by gravity-

driven processes (France, Spain, Romania)• Diluvium (not deluvium) –slopewash sediments,

including gullies (Poland)• Eluvium• Many (but not all) Germans have a narrow

definition of Kolluvium as derived only from anthropogenic soil erosion

• “Alluvial fans are not made from alluvium, they are made from colluvium.”