collective intelligence [30min].innovation kitchen 10 nov 2015
TRANSCRIPT
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence.Josep Mª Monguet
Feb 15th Elisava. Barcelona
[email protected] http://huntingmammoths.com
huntingmammoths.net
CI is not new …
The end of mammoths
huntingmammoths.net
CI has existed since the beginning of time and it’s a key for innovation.
Spear-thrower innovation + length of the lever+ acceleration of the dart+ elements to fit the fingers, + small weight + forceful + accurate launch of the dart.
huntingmammoths.net
1Individual vs. collective intelligence
huntingmammoths.net
IQ Score Classification> 145 Genius130–144 Gifted120–129 Superior110–119 Above Average90–109 Average80–89 Below Average70–79 Borderline impaired55–69 Mildly Impaired< 54 Moderately Impaired
We know about individual profiles
huntingmammoths.net
http://team.onsanity.com
Individual profiles can be mixed to see the profile of
the group
http://onsanity.com/project-view/team-equilibrium-management
/
About Team equilibrium
To do 1. Play with http://team.onsanity.com…but not so much about collective profiles
huntingmammoths.net
Organization, coordination, management control, …Ideas, visions, provocation, change, …
Analysis, caution , logics, prevention, …
Positivism, benefits, team building, …
Intuition, feelings, sense, emotions, …
Documentation, facts & figures, …
Brains working in parallel with efficiencyCI as team performance. Correlation with how well a team works.
…but not so much about collective profiles
huntingmammoths.net
You have your own individual intelligence,
… may be improved slowly with hard work.
You may participate in collective intelligence in different teams with very different results.
Individual vs collective intelligence
huntingmammoths.net
2CI a new & old discipline.
huntingmammoths.net
Ramon Llull: from ‘Ars electionis’ to social choice theory
Voting by couples
System of exhaustive binary comparisons
Couples = n*(n-1) / 2
huntingmammoths.net
Voting by couples
huntingmammoths.net
Condorcet's Jury Theorem
Probability, PN , that a jury gives the correct answer, given: N = the number of jurorsp = the probability of an individual juror being rightm = the number of jurors required for a majority
The graphs suggest that when an electorate is large enough, and individuals in that electorate are right more often than wrong, elections would act as a ‘truth tracker’.Statistical Consultants
huntingmammoths.net
1906. Video
If crowd was one entity its guess about the weight of the ox
would be keen.
Consensus.
huntingmammoths.net
Consensus.Sales reps seek out the executive who can single-handedly approve a deal at a company.Reps today rarely find a unilateral decision maker. More often, they discover that the authority to make decisions rests with groups of individuals—all of whom have different roles, and all of whom have veto power. Reaching consensus and closing deals has become an increasingly painful and protracted process for customers and suppliers alike.
huntingmammoths.net
3Digital technology fostering CI
huntingmammoths.net
“Unfettered exchange of ideas in cyberspace has the potential to liberate us from the social and political hierarchies that have stood in the way of mankind's advancement”.
Who is working in the CI field?From knowledge stock to knowledge flux
huntingmammoths.net
Who is working in the field?
Technology helping us to be much more efficient in working together. Hidden potentials for intelligence development.Education of collective abilities.Tools to play as collectives as we have to play as individuals.
huntingmammoths.net
Participation in collective intelligence
Who is working in the field?
huntingmammoths.net
Our model of ourselves as individuals must change in accordance with the new coordinates of collective
CI Options matter as much as Individual Positions
Collective Intelligence coordinates
huntingmammoths.net
*Digital
TransparencyCyberdemocracy
Public empowermentD-A creation & production
Collective Intelligence coordinates
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence coordinatesDigital g Transparency
EveryoneEverything
Everywhere
SeeShow
Acknowledge
Human society is becoming
transparent to itself
Pierre Lévy
huntingmammoths.net
Cyberspace userFree market accessWelfare management
Territories & Religions
Global lawJustice
Diversity value
Digital citiesLocal eGovernmentsVirtual communitiesVotes on line
Collective Intelligence coordinatesCyberdemocracy g Public empowerment
Participation
huntingmammoths.net
Informational capitalism
Economic goods ubiquity in cyberspace
Unexpectedcommunism
Planetary public services
Conscious investment
Conscious consumption
Learningopen
organisations
Continuousinnovation
Cooperativecompetition
Collective Intelligence coordinatesD-A g Creation g Production
Regulation from cyberdemocracy
Creation from CI
huntingmammoths.net
4Collective intelligence measure.
huntingmammoths.net
CI groups communicate more and participate more equally than other groups.
Measuring CI“In two studies with 699 people, working in groups of two to five, we find converging evidence of a general collective intelligence factor that explains a group’s performance on a wide variety of tasks. This “c factor” is not strongly correlated with the average or maximum individual intelligence of group members but is correlated with the average social sensitivity of group members, the equality in distribution of conversational turn-taking, and the proportion of females in the group.”
huntingmammoths.net
Social skills predicting a group’s CI. Social perceptiveness measured by people’s ability to judge others’ emotions based on pictures of their eyes.
Measuring CI
huntingmammoths.net
Sharing is one of the best indicators of the level of CI
Measuring CI
huntingmammoths.net
5CI areas.
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence Fields of application
Collective Intelligence
Knowledge
ActionJudgment
Predictions
Collaboration
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence Fields of application
Knowledge
S Ki
Collective Intelligence
huntingmammoths.net
Real time big dataUnconscious consensus
huntingmammoths.net
Knowledge of groupsShared knowledge
95 % of the times the guess of the
audience is correct
Slumdog millionaire, 2006
huntingmammoths.net
To go deeper: Knowledge approach to CI“Moving” knowledge
Tacit Knowledge
Explici
t knowledge
i i gi
ii
ii
i
i
go
o
g
ggg
SocialisationExternalisation
Internalisation combination
SECI Model (Nonaka,1994)
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence Fields of application
Collective Intelligence
Ç Ji
Judgment
huntingmammoths.net
Wisdom of “little” crowdsAverage values of society.
We have a huge responsibility
huntingmammoths.net
Local participation. Vallejo case
voxpopuli.stanford
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence Fields of application
Collective IntelligencePredictions
f (px)
huntingmammoths.net
High accuracy forecastingCarefully selected experts
The aggregate opinion of a group of selected intelligence analysts
will guess what is going to happen with certain precision
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence Fields of application
Collective IntelligenceAction
f (S Fi)Mississippi Burning (1988)
huntingmammoths.net
Assignment of resourcesCrowd funding for financial assignment to innovation
huntingmammoths.net
Collective Intelligence Fields of application
Collective IntelligenceCollaboration
S eiWitness (1985)
huntingmammoths.net
TerciarioShared diagnosisAn error in two health decisions
huntingmammoths.net
Data voluntary donorsCyber research?
huntingmammoths.net
62050 Trends. Collective vision of future
huntingmammoths.net
“I'm an inventor. I became interested in long-term trends because an invention has to make sense in the world in which it is finished, not the world in which it is started”
Ray Kurzweil
Minority Report, 2002
Exercice 2. Collective vision of future
huntingmammoths.net
A structured communication technique, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts.
Based on the assumption that group judgments are more valid than individual judgments.
The core aim is to build consensus, particularly in relation to controversial objectives.
Delphi technique
Pre – to do. Collective vision of future
huntingmammoths.net
Blue profile
Orange profile
Green profile
Cultu
re
Technology
Society
Sustainable
development
Environment creation
Netw
orks
of
know
ledg
eGl
obal
com
mer
ce
Dynamic business m
odels
Innovation guided
research
To do 2. Collective vision of future
huntingmammoths.net
http://lab.healthconsensus.net To do 2. Collective vision of future
huntingmammoths.net