coherent and incoherent scattering

Upload: alberto-rasa

Post on 04-Apr-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    1/22

    11. Light ScatteringCoherent vs. incoherent scattering

    Radiation from an accelerated charge

    Larmor formula

    Why the sky is blue

    Rayleigh formula

    Reflected and refracted beams from water droplets

    rainbows

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    2/22

    Coherent vs. Incoherent light scattering

    Coherentlight scattering: scattered wavelets have nonrandomrelative phases in the direction of interest.

    Incoherentlight scattering: scattered wavelets have random

    relative phases in the direction of interest.

    Forward scatteringis coherenteven if the scatterers are randomlyarranged in the plane.

    Path lengths are equal.

    Off-axis scatteringis incoherentwhen the scatterers are randomlyarranged in the plane.

    Path lengths are random.

    Incidentwave

    Example: Randomly spaced scatterers in a plane

    Incidentwave

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    3/22

    Coherentvs. IncoherentScattering

    1

    exp( )

    N

    incoh mm

    A jIncoherent scattering: Total complex amplitude,

    2

    2

    1 1 1exp( ) exp( ) exp( )

    N N N

    incoh incoh m m nm m n

    I A j j j

    The irradiance:

    So incoherent scattering is weaker than coherent scattering, but not zero.

    1

    1N

    cohm

    A N

    Coherent scattering:

    Total complex amplitude, . Irradiance, I A2. So: Icoh N2

    m=n m n

    1 1 1 1exp[ ( )] exp[ ( )]

    N N N N

    m n m nm n m nm n m n

    j j N

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    4/22

    Incoherent scattering: Reflection

    from a Rough Surface

    A rough surface scatters lightinto all directions with lots ofdifferent phases.

    As a result, what we see is light

    reflected from many differentdirections. Well see no glare,

    and also no reflections.

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    5/22

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    6/22

    Radiation from an accelerated charge

    initial positionof a charge q,

    at rest

    {

    tiny period of

    acceleration,of duration t

    {

    coasting atconstant velocityv for a time t1

    ct

    r = ct1

    In order to understand this scattering process, we will analyze it at amicroscopic level. With several simplifying assumptions:1. the scatterer is much smaller than the wavelength of the incident light

    2. the frequency of the light is much less than any resonant frequency.

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    7/22

    Radiation from an accelerated charge

    ct

    vt1

    ||EE

    || 1v t

    1v t

    By similar triangles: 1

    ||

    v t

    c t

    E

    E

    But the velocity v can be related to theacceleration during the small interval t:

    v = at

    which implies: v a t

    1|| || 2

    a t a r

    c cE E E

    and therefore:

    ||EFinally, the field must be equal to the field of a static charge(this can be proved using Gauss Law):

    ||204 r

    qE

    2

    0

    a

    4 rc

    q

    E

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    8/22

    Radiation from an accelerated charge

    20

    a

    4 rc

    q

    E

    || 204 r

    qE

    As r becomes large, the parallelcomponent goes to zero muchmore rapidly than the perpendicularcomponent. We can therefore

    neglectE|| if we are far enoughaway from the moving charge.

    Also: a asin

    So, the radiated EM wave has a magnitude:

    20

    a sin,

    4 rc

    q tE r t

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1010-6

    10-5

    10-4

    10-3

    10 -2

    10-1

    100

    1/r

    1/r2

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    9/22

    Spatial pattern of the radiation

    60

    240

    30

    210

    0

    180

    330

    150

    300

    120

    270 90

    a

    S

    2D slice 3D cutaway view

    direction of the

    acceleration

    Magnitude of the Poynting vector: 2 2 2 22 2 3

    0

    a sin, sin

    16 r c

    q tS r t

    No energy is radiated in the direction of the acceleration.

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    10/22

    This integral is equal to 4/3

    Total radiated power - the Larmor formula

    To find the total power radiated in all directions, integrate themagnitude of the Poynting vector over all angles:

    22

    0 0

    2 23

    3

    0 0

    sin ,

    asin

    8 c

    P t r d d S r t

    qd

    2 2

    30

    a

    6 c

    qP t

    Thus:

    This is known as the Larmor formula.Total radiated power is independent of distance from the charge Power proportional to square of acceleration

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    11/22

    Larmor formula - application to scattering

    0

    2 20

    j te

    e

    eE m

    x t e

    Recall our derivation of the position of an electron, bound toan atom, in an applied oscillating electric field:

    (we can neglect the damping

    factor , for this analysis)

    ae t^ h = dt2d2xe

    =-eE0 me~02

    ~2

    e-j~t

    From the position we can compute the acceleration:

    This is known asRayleighs Law:scattered power

    proportional to4

    xe t^ h .~0

    2

    eE0 me e-j~t

    We assume that the frequency is much smaller than the resonantfrequency,

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    12/22

    This is why the sky is blue.

    Blue light ( = 400 nm) is scattered16times more efficiently than red

    light ( =800 nm)

    Total scattered power ~ 4th power of thefrequency of the incident light

    Rayleighs Law:

    sunlight

    earth

    scattered light thatwe see

    For the same reason, sunsets are red.

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    13/22

    The world of light scattering

    is a very large oneParticle size/wavelength

    Refractivein

    dex

    Mie Scattering

    Ra

    yleighScattering

    Totally reflecting objects

    Geometricaloptics

    Rayleigh-Gans Scattering

    Large

    ~1

    ~0

    ~0 ~1 Large

    There are manyregimes of particlescattering,depending on the

    particle size, thelight wavelength,and the refractiveindex.

    As a result, thereare countlessobservable effectsof light scattering.

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    14/22

    Another example of incoherent scattering:

    the reason for rainbows

    Light canenter adroplet atdifferent

    distancesfrom its edge.

    waterdroplet

    One can compute the angle of the emerging light as a

    function of the incident position.

    Minimum deflection angle (~138);rainbow radius = 42

    Input light paths

    ~180 deflection

    Path leadingto minimum deflection

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    15/22

    Deflection angle vs. wavelength

    Lots of light of all colors is deflected by more than 138,so the region below rainbow is bright and white.

    Because nvaries with wavelength, theminimum deflection angle varies with color.

    Lots of red deflected at this angle

    Lots of violet deflected at this angle

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    16/22

    A rainbow, with supernumeraries

    The sky is much brighter below the rainbow than above.

    The multiple greenish-purple arcs inside the primary bow are calledsupernumeraries. They result from the fact that the raindrops are not all

    the same size. In this picture, the size distribution is about 8% (std. dev.)

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    17/22

    Explanation of 2nd rainbow

    Minimum deflection angle (~232.5)yielding a rainbow radius of 52.5.

    Water droplet

    Because the angular radius is larger, the 2nd bow is above the 1st one.

    Because energy is lost at each reflection, the 2nd rainbow is weaker.

    Because of the double bounce, the 2nd rainbow is inverted. And the

    region above it (instead of below) is brighter.

    A 2nd rainbow can result from light entering the dropletin its lower half and making 2 internal reflections.

    Distance fromdroplet edge

    D

    eflectionangle

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    18/22

    The dark band between the two bows

    is known as Alexanders dark band,after Alexander of Aphrodisias who firstdescribed it (200 A.D.)

    A double rainbow

    Note that the upper bow is inverted.

    ray tracing

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    19/22

    Multiple order bows

    A simulation of thehigher order bows

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Ray paths for thehigher order bows

    3rd and 4th rainbows are weaker, more spread out, and toward the sun.

    5th rainbow overlaps 2nd, and 6th is below the 1st.

    There were no reliable reports of sightings of anything higher than a

    second order bow, until 2011.

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    20/22

    The first ever photo of a triple and a quad

    from Photographic observation of a natural fourth-order rainbow,byM. Theusner,Applied Optics (2011)

    (involving multiple superimposed exposures and significant image processing)

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    21/22

    Look here for lots ofinformation and pictures:

    Other atmospheric optical effects

    http://www.atoptics.co.uk

  • 7/29/2019 Coherent and Incoherent Scattering

    22/22

    Six rainbows?

    Explanation:http://www.atoptics.co.uk/rainbows/bowim6.htmhttp://www.atoptics.co.uk/rainbows/bowim6.htm