cognitive model of children’s metaphor tamara i. dotsenko perm state pedagogical university...

26
Cognitive model of children’s metaphor Tamara I. Dotsenko Perm State Pedagogical University 614000, Perm, Siberskaya,24, [email protected] Olga V. Shabalina Perm Krai In-Servise Theacher Traiming Institute 614017, Perm, Lebedeva,2 [email protected] 1

Upload: alannah-poole

Post on 17-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Cognitive model of children’s metaphor

Tamara I. DotsenkoPerm State Pedagogical University

614000, Perm, Siberskaya,24,

[email protected]

Olga V. ShabalinaPerm Krai In-Servise Theacher Traiming Institute

614017, Perm, Lebedeva,2

[email protected]

1

Introduction

In modern linguistics the metaphor is

understood as:

• Trop (poetics,stylistics, rhetoric)

• Language phenomenon — a source of new words meanings

• Сognitive phenomenon

2

The research of children’s metaphor is usually connected

with:

• the problem of its recognition/non-recognition

• the recognition of it as language phenomenon

3

The origin of metaphorical children expressions is caused by

difficulties in speech communications:

misunderstanding the adults

search of a nomination for a new object

Exit out of difficulty

catching similarity between objects

4

Hypothesis of research:

аs a result of catching similarity between objects in the mind of the child the primary cognitive model of metaphor, or сognitive model of a children’s metaphor is formed

5

The aim of researching:

to reveal structure cognitive models of

children's metaphor

6

Materials of researching:

105 object-verbal and 106 word-verbal

metaphorical pairs

The description of experiment:

Examinees: two groups (32 persons each) of 5-6 year-old children

The stimuli:

• оbjects: мяч (a ball), варежка (mitten), мыльница (a soap tray), карандаш (a pencil)

• a correlate-word for these оbjects

The experimental task:

answer the question: “To what is it similar?”.

7

Method of modeling:

• the semantic analysis

• the comparative analysis of object-verbal and word-verbal metaphorical pairs

• the quantitative analysis (calculation of relative frequency and the correlation analysis)

8

Fields-sources (thematic zones) of children's metaphor

Metaphor - is the transfer of knowledge

from the field of our experience (field-

source) to another less familiar field - the

target (Lakoff)

In experiment • field - target – is the material of a stimulus• field-source – are the answers of the examinees

9

Frequency of semantic zones of the field-source of a metaphor

№ Zone of theme Children

object word1 Geometrical figures 0,37 0,27

2 Household objects 0,20 0,23

3 Toys 0,12 0,07

4 Instruments of writing and drawing 0,07 0,04

5 Parts of the man’s body 0,07 0,04

6 Fruits 0,05 0,09

7 Plants and their parts 0,05 0,06

8 Heavenly bodies 0,04 0,06

9 Living beings and parts of their bodies 0,01 0,05

10 Graphic signs 0,01 0,03

11 Clothes 0,01 0,01

12 Foodstuff 0,00 0,03

13 Fantastic characters s 0,00 0,02

From the table follows:

1) all the thematic zones of the object field-source are included into the field-source of a word

2) the most often activated are the two thematic zones

• «geometrical figures» • «household objects»

11

Semantic attributes in the structure of a children's

metaphor

Integrated semantic attributes (ISA) - are common for stimuli and answer- reactions

ISA • are found for each separate pair• are compared in correlating object-verbal and word-verbal pairs

12

Integrated semantic attributes in object-verbal and

word-verbal pairs

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

окру

глос

ть М

объе

мно

сть

К

узос

ть К

твер

дост

ь К

прод

олго

вато

сть

В

объе

мно

сть

МЦ

объе

мно

сть

М

из д

ерев

а К

нали

чие

поло

сти

внут

ри В

Pres

ence

of a

cav

ity in

side

МЦ

To c

onta

in B

Softn

ess

B

fabr

ic B

To c

onta

in B

Dim

endi

ons

B

Rec

tang

ular

МЦ

To c

lose

МЦ

Rot

undi

ty М

Ц

Pres

ence

of t

wo

parts

МЦ

Pres

ence

of t

wo

parts

B

Poin

tedn

ess

B

To w

ash,

bat

he М

Ц

To m

ove

M

Poin

tedn

ess

K

Pres

ence

of a

cav

ity in

side

K

To w

rite,

dra

w K

Rec

tang

ular

To w

arm

B

Rot

undi

ty B

Woo

l B

Pres

ence

of a

cav

ity in

side

B

Red

col

or M

To p

ut B

Rec

tang

ular

B

Size

МЦ

Size

K

Yello

w c

olor

K

To m

ove

K

To p

lay

M

To in

flate

M

object-verbal word-verbal

The figure shows: 1) 92% correlating pairs are organized by the ISA in which

sensually perceived attributes of objects are represented

2) the Spirmen factor has shown a high correlation of ISA in both the pairs: мяч (a ball) rs=0,875, варежка (mitten) rs=0,765, мыльница (a soap tray) rs=0,850, карандаш (a pencil) rs=0,950.

The children's metaphor represents the uniform mechanism of catching of the similarity between the objects, poorly

differentiated in relation to a object and a word

Ways of the organization of integrated semantic attributes in

structure of a children's metaphor

Integrated semantic attributes are organized1) by the semantic complex (SC):• not dismembered • dismembered2) by one member semantic attribute

15

The ways of the integrated semantic attributes in a children's metaphor organization

stimulus object-verbal pair word-verbal pair

average 0,83 0,05 0,12 0,86 0,02 0,12

Not

dis

mem

bere

d S

C

Dis

mem

bere

d S

C

One

mem

ber

Not

dis

mem

bere

d S

C

Dis

mem

bere

d S

C

One

mem

ber

Average shows: the basic way of the semantic attributes in a children's metaphor organization is not a dismembered semantic complex

16

Types of integrated semantic attributes in the structure of a children's metaphor

0,55 0,54

0,14 0,13 0,13 0,13 0,130,15

0,03 0,030,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1F

orm

Str

uctu

re

Function

Mate

rial

Contiguity

Colo

r

Siz

e

object-verbal pair

word-verbal pair

The figure shows:

1) On the basis of frequency semantic types the following characteristics are received:

• «form» — is the main structuring attribute (0,55 );• «function», «structure», «material» - are strong

central attributes (0,13) • «contiguity in space», «color», «size» — are weak

peripheral attributes (0,03-0,01)

2) The Spirmen factor, close to 1 (rs=0,98), specifies the full correlation of semantic types for

object-verbal and word-verbal metaphorical pair

18

1) The children's metaphor is the mechanism of catching similarity between the objects, poorly differentiated in relation to a subject and a word.

Conclusions:

1) The children's metaphor is the mechanism of catching similarity between the objects, poorly differentiated in relation to a subject and a word.

2) The field-source of a children's metaphor includes a set of thematic zones. The basic thematic zones of the field-source are «household objects» and «geometrical figures».

Conclusions:

1) The children's metaphor is the mechanism of catching similarity between the objects, poorly differentiated in relation to a subject and a word.

2) The field-source of a children's metaphor includes a set of

thematic zones. The basic thematic zones of the field-source are «household objects» and «geometrical figures».

3) Similarity between the objects or their images is usually caught by not dismembered complexes of semantic attributes, in which sensually perceived attributes of objects are represented

Conclusions:

1) The children's metaphor is the mechanism of catching similarity between the objects, poorly differentiated in relation to a subject and a word.

2) The field-source of a children's metaphor includes a set of thematic zones. The basic thematic zones of the field-source are «household objects » and «geometrical figures ».

3) Similarity between the objects or their images is usually caught by not dismembered complexes of semantic attributes, in which sensually perceived attributes of objects are represented

4) Not dismembered semantic complexes include the following attributes: "form", "structure", "function", "material", « a contiguity in space », "color", "size".

Conclusions:

1) The children's metaphor is the mechanism of catching similarity between the objects, poorly differentiated in relation to a subject and a word.

2) The field-source of a children's metaphor includes a set of thematic zones. The basic thematic zones of the field-source are «household objects » and «geometrical figures ».

3) Similarity between the objects or their images is usually caught by not dismembered complexes of semantic attributes, in which sensually perceived attributes of objects are represented

4) Not dismembered semantic complexes include the following attributes: "form", "structure", "function", "material", « a contiguity in space », "color", "size".

5) Not dismembered semantic complex represents a probability organized structure. Its main attribute is "form". The attributes "structure", "function" and "material" characterize its center, and « a contiguity in space », "color" and "size" - periphery.

Conclusions:

1) The children's metaphor is the mechanism of catching similarity between the objects, poorly differentiated in relation to a subject and a word.

2) The field-source of a children's metaphor includes a set of thematic zones. The basic thematic zones of the field-source are «household objects » and «geometrical figures ».

3) Similarity between the objects or their images is usually caught by not dismembered complexes of semantic attributes, in which sensually perceived attributes of objects are represented

4) Not dismembered semantic complexes include the following attributes: "form", "structure", "function", "material", « a contiguity in space », "color", "size".

5) Not dismembered semantic complex represents a probability organized structure. Its main attribute is "form". The attributes "structure", "function" and "material" characterize its center, and « a contiguity in space », "color" and "size" - periphery.

6) The success of the child in his speech activity, the processes of speech perception and production, are determined by the degree his cognitive metaphor model formation.

Conclusions:

Thanks for attention!

20

Cognitive model of children’s metaphor

Tamara I. DotsenkoPerm State Pedagogical University

614000, Perm, Siberskaya,24,

[email protected]

Olga V. ShabalinaPerm Krai In-Servise Theacher Traiming Institute

614017, Perm, Lebedeva,2

[email protected]

21