cognitive linguistics croft&cruse 5: polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

15
Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

Upload: luc-chesnut

Post on 31-Mar-2015

291 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse

5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

Page 2: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.1 Introduction

• Q: What is polysemy?

Page 3: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.1 Introduction

• Q: What is polysemy?

• A: It is the presence of various meanings associated with a single linguistic unit. It is manifested as “variation in the construal of a word on different occasions of its use”; “the process of isolating a portion of meaning potential”

Page 4: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.1 Homonymy and polysemy

• Q: What is the difference between homonymy and polysemy?

Page 5: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.1 Homonymy and polysemy

• Q: What is the difference between homonymy and polysemy?– Homonymy is when two words are

(etymologically) distinct, but sound the same due to historical accident

– Polysemy is when one word has multiple meanings (and supposedly only one etymological antecedent)

Page 6: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.1 Homonymy and polysemy

• But is it so cut-and-dry? Consider flour vs. flower. They have one etymological source (meaning ‘best part’). Do you want to call this polysemy? Or Czech prepositions s ‘off of’ vs. z ‘from’ – etymologically distinct, but now semantically identical… Do you want to call that homonymy?

? vs. ?

Page 7: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.2 Entrenchment

• Dictionaries tend to present only the most entrenched meanings

Page 8: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.3 Boundary effects

• Note that there can be some autonomy of senses within ambiguity.

Page 9: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.3.1 Antagonism: attentional autonomy

• If one sense excludes the other, the senses are in a relationship of antagonism

Page 10: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.3.2 Relational autonomy

• Basically, what C&C are saying here is that sometimes some of the submeanings are related to each other rather than being fully autonomous. So old vs. new is not fully autonomous from old vs. young.

Page 11: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

Hyperonyms and meronyms

• Q: What are they?

Page 12: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

Hyperonyms, hyponyms, and meronyms

• Q: What are they?• Hyperonym: a superordinate category that

subsumes items in lower categories. For example, furniture subsumes chairs, sofas, tables, etc.

• Hyponym: a subordinate category, that names more specific items. For example beanbag chair, barstool, lounger in relation to chair.

• Meronym: a word that names a part of a larger whole: leg, seat, back, upholstery, cushion, etc. are meronyms of chair.

Page 13: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.3.3 Compositional autonomy

• Here the issue is what sense is selected by the construction a word is in. For example, an adjective might select for only one of the meanings of a polysemous noun, as in: steep bank.

Page 14: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.4 The nature of full sense units

• Q: Why are full sense units antagonistic?

Page 15: Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 5: Polysemy: the construal of sense boundaries, pt. 1

5.2.4 The nature of full sense units

• Q: Why are full sense units antagonistic?• A: They often have few components in

common and belong to different domains. They also resist unification (one cannot be subsumed by the other, nor can they both be members of the same category). But they can be quite close, as in month, which can designate either 4 weeks or a calendar month.