cognitive challenge summary analysis of phase ii data –240 sessions analyzed using bputil...

63
Cognitive Challenge Summary • Analysis of Phase II data – 240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats – ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and STG – Comparison of FIPS and BPutil for Iowa data • New task development – Emotional oddball (event-related) – Emotional executive (blocked) – Movie clips

Upload: primrose-holmes

Post on 03-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Cognitive Challenge Summary

• Analysis of Phase II data– 240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline,

BIRN QA and Eventstats– ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and STG– Comparison of FIPS and BPutil for Iowa data

• New task development– Emotional oddball (event-related)– Emotional executive (blocked)– Movie clips

Page 2: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Constant Fixation

15s

………

.5s 6-15 s 6-15 s

1000Hz 1200Hz

Page 3: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Slice Depth: Z=-11ControlsPatients

Controls:N=41, p<1x10-10

Patients:N=44, p<1x10-5

Vis

it 1

Vis

it 2

MFG, Right Hemisphere, Visit 1

MFG, Right Hemisphere, Visit 2

Page 4: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 5: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Voxel Counts by Visit and ROI

Page 6: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Time-Course by Visit and Diagnosis in MFG

Page 7: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Auditory Oddball

Page 8: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Auditory Oddball Summary

• Robust activations of dlPFC, IPL, STG, insula, cingulate, thalamus, and motor cortex– In all locations, controls > patients

• Strong visual cortex activation suggests that infrequent tones evoke an orienting response– Brainstem activation is also suggestive, but

less visible in count conditions

Page 9: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Learn

Probes (14 Total)

0 2 1 3 8 9 7 2 4 . . .7 * 5 * 4 4 6 5 1 . . .* * 9 * * 3 9 2 8 . . .

Prompt

Learn

Learn

Encoding

4s-20sFixation

0s 8s6s4s2s 10s … … 46s

4s-20sFixation

5 items

3 items

1 item

Page 10: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

IPS SIRP

Page 11: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

MFG SIRP

Page 12: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Preliminary SIRP Summary

• Strong co-activation of regions also activated by Auditory Oddball (except STG)

• At low and medium load, patients > controls during probe intervals

• At high load, patients ~= controls

Page 13: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

MFG

Page 14: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

IFG

Page 15: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

STG

Page 16: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

IPS Encode

Page 17: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

IPS Probe

Page 18: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

MFG Encode

Page 19: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

MFG Probe

Page 20: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Cognitive Challenge Summary

New task development– Emotional oddball (event-related)– Emotional executive (blocked)– Movie clips

Page 21: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Dorsal executive control system

LC Amyg

Th BGVTA

Raphe vmPFC

dlPFC

Amyg

IPS

vlPFC

OFC

Ventral affective processing system

Page 22: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

TargetsStandard NovelsNeutral Emotional

84% 8% 4% 4%

Emotional Distracter Task

Page 23: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Yamasaki, LaBar, McCarthy, PNAS, 2002

...

......

......

Emotional Distracter Task

Page 24: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Sad Stimulus Distracter Task

Wang, LaBar, McCarthy, Biol Psychiat, in press

Page 25: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Emotional Distracter

Page 26: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Emotional Distractor TaskMiddle Frontal Gyrus (anterior)

-0.10%

-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

-3 0 3 6 9 12 15

Emotional novel

Neutral novel

Target

Page 27: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

-0.10%

-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0.30%

-3 0 3 6 9 12 15

Emotional novel

Neutral novel

Target

Emotional Distractor TaskAmygdala

Page 28: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Emotional Distracter

Page 29: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Anterior MFG

Posterior IFG

-0.10%

-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

-3 0 3 6 9 12 15

Emotional novel

Neutral novel

Target

-0.10%

-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

-3 0 3 6 9 12 15

Emotional novel

Neutral novel

Target

Emotional Distracter Task

Page 30: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Phase I (15s) Phase II (14s)

Memoranda Probe

3.5s 1.5s

Novel stimuli (6s)

+ ++

Emotional Distracters and Working Memory

Dolcos and McCarthy, J Neurosci, 2006

Page 31: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Increased distractibility to emotional distracters linked to differential patterns of activity in the dorsal executive vs. ventral affective neural systems.

MR

sig

nal c

hang

e (

%)

-0.2

-0.1

0.1

0.3 dlPFC

MR

sig

nal c

hang

e (

%)

-0.2

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

AMY

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Cor

rect

ed R

ecog

nitio

n S

core

s

Scrambled Scene DistractersNeutral Scene DistractersEmotional Scene Distracters

Page 32: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Amygdala activity to emotional distracters

5.5 6.75 8-0.1

0.05

0.2

0.35

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

time (sec)

Scrambled Neutral Emotional

MR

sig

na

l ch

an

ge

(%

)

Page 33: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

-0.2

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.1

0.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.1

0.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.1

0.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.1

0.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

0.2

0.6

0.9

1.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

0.2

0.6

0.9

1.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

0.2

0.6

0.9

1.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

-0.2

0.2

0.6

0.9

1.3

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26

Negative DistracterMeaningless Distracter Neutral Distracter

Page 34: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Emotional Oddball

• Ayse Belger’s group collected data

• 10 CONTROLS, 11 SCZ PATIENTS

Page 35: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

MFGCONTROLS SCZ PATIENTS

Page 36: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSIfg/BA 47

Page 37: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSOF

Page 38: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSFFG

Page 39: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSPosterior Parietal

Page 40: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSAMYGDALA

Page 41: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 42: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 43: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 44: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

0s 10s 30s20s 40s 60s50s 80s70s

Neutral BlockExecutive Block

Fixation

Emotional Block

Emotional Executive Task, Block-Design

……

……

Scrambled Images

…… ……

Page 45: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

MFG

IFG

vmPFC

Blocked Emotional Executive

Page 46: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Left MFG

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Emotional

Neutral

Target

left MFG

Page 47: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Left IFG

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Emotional

Neutral

Target

right IFG

Page 48: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Inferior Frontal Gyri

Page 49: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

vmPFC

Page 50: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

vmPFC

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Emotional

Neutral

Target

vmPFC

Page 51: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Inferior Parietal Lobule and VOTC

Page 52: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Left Parietal

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Emotional

Neutral

Target

left Parietal

Page 53: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

Left VOTC

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Emotional

Neutral

Target

left VOTC

Page 54: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSINSULA

Page 55: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSACG

Page 56: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSThalamus

Page 57: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and

CONTROLS SCZ PATIENTSCaudate

Page 58: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 59: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 60: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 61: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 62: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and
Page 63: Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and