coffee final
DESCRIPTION
papers regarding coffeeTRANSCRIPT
-
Argayoso, Melissa Tamara EC111-I
Aquino, Sarah
Baguio, Jedidiah
Bautista, Samantha
Lau, Sydney
The Coffee Industry of the Philippines
I. Scope and Limitation
This study will be focused on the Philippines' coffee industry, both from the point of view of its
producers, the local farmers, and consumers. While the industry has grown from just instant, RTD, and
the consumer good segment into being a large presence in the services sector with cafes, the paper will be
mostly limited to the former. Particularly, this paper aims to view the coffee industry under the lens of
economics and provide answers as to why something so highly demanded in the country has a supply that
rarely fails to meet it. Following this, the group will provide recommendations from both the business and
economic perspectives to bolster growth in the segment, which has been something the government has
been desiring for a while now.
II. Introduction
As a commodity, coffee plays an important role in the world commodity with its position as the
second most consumed beverage in the world after water. It is actually the second most traded commodity
in the world after petroleum, and contributes to the economies of over 70 countries through its production
and export. This also makes coffee the most valuable and widely traded tropical agricultural product.
Internationally, the biggest coffee producer is Brazil, which provides for roughly 15% of the entire global
coffee market. It is important to note that most major players in the coffee scene are developing countries,
which Vietnam, Indonesia, Colombia, Ethiopia, India, and Mexico following Brazil. (NICCEP, 2012)
Figure 1. Largest Global Producers and Importers of Coffee
Source: Fairtrade Foundation. (2012) Fairtrade and Coffee: Commodity Briefing.
The total size of the industry itself is worth over 100 billion dollars, putting it ahead of
commodities like natural gas, gold, sugar, and corn. This translates to 500 billion cups of coffee a year
and the livelihood of over 25 million people all over the world. (Goldschein, 2011). Exports alone amount
to $23.5 billion (translated to 5.8 million tonnes) in 2011 to the GDP of developing countries. It is
-
important to note that the largest consumers and importers of coffee are traditional markets like Western
Europe, Japan and the US, while the emerging markets of Eastern Europe and Asia are showing the most
growth year on year amounting to roughly 46%. In relation to this, global consumption growth, which has
grown by almost double in the past 40 years shows no signs of stopping, forecasted to reach 9.09 million
tonnes by 2019 (Fairtrade Foundation, 2012).
Two decades ago, the Philippines used to be among the developing countries that contributed a
significant percentage to the global production of coffee. Unfortunately, today it produces less than 1% of
the worlds total coffee exports. This is especially distressing as coffee production continues to fail to meet country demand. "Data shows that present consumption stands at 65,000 metric tons a year, while
production only stands at 25,000". This implies almost P4 billion in imports that could be going into the
hands of our local farmers (Keith, 2012). Realizing this lost opportunity, the country is taking measures
to revive a redevelop its coffee industry through an allotment of P192 million for its Cacao Agribusiness
Zone Development (Despuez, 2012), a Public Private Partnership (PPP) Program to learn from the best
practices of Vietnam 2nd in world production (Cahiles-Magkilat, 2012), and partnerships with corporations like Nestle for them to buy more coffee berries from the Philippines and less from foreign
sources (GMA News, 2011). The question of whether these are the best courses of action for the country
still stands, and will hopefully be answered in the latter parts of the paper.
A. Coffee Production in the Philippines
The Philippines actually grows less than 2% of the worlds coffee production, which hardly maximizes the countrys potential in the industry as considering it geographically lies in the narrow coffee belt of the world, making it one of the few countries that can grow all kinds of coffee: Arabica,
Excelsa, Liberica and Robusta. However, decades prior paint a different picture as the Philippines
actually used to be a major producer and exporter of coffee products, peaking at 4th worldwide in during
the Spanish era. It was also a relatively major player in the 1980s, among the many developing countries
in the coffee belt to produce for exports. However, the industry took a major dip in the 1990s where it no
longer could compete globally with other coffee manufacturers (Austria, 2002).
Figure 2. Relative comparative advantage of Philippine Coffee Production Industry to
International Counterparts 1977-1999
Source: Austria, M. (2002) The Philippines in the Global Trading Environment: Looking Back and the
Road Ahead.
Currently the Philippines has a modest coffee industry that fails to maximize its potentials. Census data
reveals that there are roughly 410,000 farms covering ~123,000 ha, of which all commercial varieties of
coffee are grown: Robusta accounting for 70%, Arabica for 5-10%, and Excelsa and Liberica for 15-20%.
-
Unfortunately, this amount has not been growing along with the increasing global and local
coffee demand (NICCEP, 2012) as production has even declined slightly from 2008 to 2009 in a
downturn of 1.02%(Ang, 2000).
Figure 3: Coffee Production in the Philippines (2007-2009)
Source: Ang, P. (2009) Philippine Coffee Annual.
Declines in production are often attributed to the peace and order situation of Mindanao that
grows approximately 60% of the countrys coffee beans, excessive weather conditions in the area caused by El Nino and El Nina phenomena. In addition to this, farmers also face the low-buying price of coffee
in Caraga provinces as well as the continuous neglect of coffee farms in Cavite and Davao del Norte
(COCAFM, 2000), which barely incentivizes them to continue coffee production.
Figure 4: Share of Areas for Coffee Plantation in the Philippines
Source: COCAFM. (2011) The Coffee Industry, Congressional Oversight Committee on Agricultural and
Fisheries Modernization.
It doesnt help that coffee is a product whose price traditionally fluctuates from year on year according to weather conditions, disease and other factors. This price vulnerability makes those who depend on coffee as their livelihood especially vulnerable as it would become difficult for them to predict
their incomes and budget for their household and business needs. This is especially true for the poor
farmers of the Philippines, who have a hard time finding the incentive or the resources to invest in good maintenance and growth of their farms, especially when they end up struggling to make ends meet when the coffee market is down (Fairtrade Foundation, 2012). Below is the price fluctuations of the Robusta
type of coffee, which is the majority of the Philippines production, and it can be observed that it went from as low as to 17 cents in 2001 a pound to as high as 120 cents in 2011.
-
Figure 5. Price Fluctuations of Robusta Coffee (1989-2011)
Source: Fairtrade Foundation. (2012) Fairtrade and Coffee: Commodity Briefing.
In recent years however, government has been very adamant to boost up coffee production. In
particular, they are looking at new areas to put farms and increase capacity, especially in the Visayas
which is yet to grow coffee. They are particularly looking at Negros Occidental; they also want to
increase the area of coffee production in Davao, especially in the areas of Mt. Apo and Mt. Matutum, and
the Cordilleras Ifugao and Mountain Province. This is looking to add roughly 7,000 metric tons of coffee per year in two years (De la Fuente, 2012).
B. Coffee Demand in the Philippines
The demand for coffee has been increasing across the years. In 2011, volume sales increased by
7% and is projected to have a 5% CAGR in the coming years (Euromonitor, 2012). The graph below
details the industrys historic retail value growth (2007 to 2012) and its expected future growth (2013 to
2017).
Source: Euromonitor
Furthermore, according to the Philippine Coffee Board Inc., PCBI, demand rose from 75,000
tons in 2010 to 100,000 metric tons in 2012 (Olchondra, 2012). The increasing popularity and
consumption of coffee can be attributed to the wide range of its captive market segments. In fact, coffee is
considered to be a staple to a Filipino household (Ang, 2009). It is usually served to accompany breakfast,
18.9 21.4 24.3 27.2
30.2 31.5 34.8 38.3
41.9 45.7 49.5
0
20
40
60
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Retail Value RSP - Ps bn
-
may it be pan de sal or rice meals. The average Filipino consumer an average of 2 cups of coffee per day
(Avillanosa, 2012).
The lower to middle income consumers hugely account for coffee demand in the country. Their
main considerations aside from taste are convenience and value for money (Euromonitor, 2011). As such,
most of the coffee companies continue to innovate and introduce new variants, such as pre-mixed, instant
coffee (eg 3-in-1, 4-in-1, 5-in-1) and single-serve packaging, to encourage consumption from this
segment. This market positioning strategy is motivated by the fact that classes C, D (average Filipino or
masa) and E comprise 9%, 60% and 30% of the population, respectively (NSCB and SWS data, James
2012). Capturing these segments can certainly increase a companys market share. However, companies
should be willing to set modest prices as they are catering to buyers who are very price conscious and
sensitive.
On the opposite end, there is also a market that prioritizes premium quality coffee variants over
price. Although it is a rather niche market, high-income and some middle-income consumers are willing
to pay extra for a better coffee experience (Euromonitor, 2012). They prefer fresh coffee and more
sophisticated flavors that are available only in chained supermarkets, hypermarkets or specialty stores,
typically found in the countrys key cities (eg Manila). Demand for fresh coffee is not so high, accounting
for only 10% of total volume sales. It did, however, record a 4% increase in volume sales in 2011, slightly
lower than instant coffees 7% rise.
Aside from the socioeconomic profile of coffee drinkers, the market expanded to include younger
consumers as well. The age bracket for Filipino coffee drinkers go as young as 15 years old to as old as
65 years old (Avillanosa, 2012). In fact, in 2008 the 15-24 age group took up a 26% share in the countrys
total coffee consumption (Research and Markets, 2008). According to Andrew Ward, Nescafs world-
wide account director, Coffee is now th beverage of choice amongst young people.. (PhilStar.com,
2001)
III. Industry Environment
A. Major Players & Competition
The chart below shows the major competitors in the industry. Nestl Philippines, Inc. for the past
years has dominated the coffee industry. In 2011, it accounts for 88.6% of value shares with its Nescaf
brands. The second major player lags very far behind with a 3.7% market share. Universal Robina Corp.
has two brands, namely Great Taste (3.6%) and Blend 45 (0.1%). It is then followed by Mayora Indahs
Kopiko (2.2%), San Miguel Super Coffee Mix Co. (1.9%), and Krafts Foods Phils, Inc. with its brand,
Maxwell House (1.8%). The other players in the industry account for the remaining 1.7% market share.
-
Source: Euromonitor
Comparing the brand volume shares across the years, the top two brands, Nescaf and Great
Taste, have lost 2.1% and 2.5% of its shares, respectively. Kopiko and San Mig Coffee, on the other hand,
have gradually increased its product following by 5.3% and 0.6%, respectively. However, it is worth
noting that although Nescafs volume shares declined, it still continued to register an increase in value
shares from 86.7% in 2007 to 88.5% in 2011. This is because (1) Nescafs instant coffee is still priced
slightly higher than of other brands and, (2) Nescaf has a lot of product variants differentiated that cater
to several market segments, including the high-income buyers.
Nescaf. As already mentioned, this brand clearly dominates the market with 88.6% of the market
share. Nestl has been around since 1895, and Nescaf was first introduced in 1938. The brands long
history and stretched presence in the industry is a superior advantage. In the Philippines, coffee is almost
always associated with Nescaf. They continue to nurture brand equity and brand loyalty through
aggressive advertising. Among all the players, Nestl allocates the biggest budget for marketing and
invests and capitalizes on almost all channels. It has placements on traditional avenues such as television,
radio and print media (Avillanosa, 2012). It also explores non-traditional marketing as well, such as the
use of social media (Facebook, viral Youtube videos) and interactive marketing (Bayani, 2012). In fact,
Nestl Philippines Inc. won the ARAW Advertiser of the Year Award in 2011the most prestigious
award in the Philippine advertising industry (Nestle.com.ph, 2011). Also, Nescafs digital campaigns
were so effective that a double digit growth in sales was recorded in 2012 (PANA, 2012). Its Facebook
fan page currently tops all brand pages in the country with over 2.2 million fans.
Aside from an extensive advertising, Nescaf has a lot of variants as well. This is aligned with its
strategy to cater as many market segments. As phrased in their Facebook page, No matter who you are,
or what taste you prefer, Nescafe has a coffee specially roasted for you. Product differentiation is in
terms of flavors, packaging and price points offered. It is summarized in the table below. Nestl also
leverages on a comprehensive distribution network in supermarkets, groceries, convenience stores and
even in neighborhood, sari-sari stores. Nescaf occupies the largest shelf-space in supermarkets.
Type of Consumer Product Flavor Packaging
Middle to Lower
Class
Pre-mixed coffee (3-in-1)
- classic, original, strong n rich, decaf, brown n creamy, creamy latte, chocolate, etc.
Single-serve sachets
Single-serve sticks
Doy Packs
Middle to High Class Premium Coffee Gold Dolce Gusto Italian coffee flavors (peach, vanilla latte macchiato, grande intenso, mocha, etc.)
Doy Packs
Boxes (with single serve
sachets)
88.6%
3.7% 2.2% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7%
Company Value Shares (2011) Nestl Philippines, Inc. (Nescaf &Nescaf Taster's Choice)Universal Robina Corp. (Great Taste &Blend 45)Mayora Indah Tbk PT (Kopiko)
San Miguel Super Coffee Mix Co. (SanMig Coffee & San Miguel)Kraft Foods Phils. Inc (Maxwell House)
-
Jars
Health Conscious Body Partner (Protect, Fit, Relax, Lingzhi)
Decaf, 3in1 Decaf, 3in1 sugar free
Doy Packs
Single-serve sachets
Younger Market Mocha, Latte Ready-to-Drink Cans
Nestls Research and Development arm is another key competitive advantage of the firm. The
29 research development and technology facilities it has worldwide are all aimed towards providing and
assuring its consumer base with high quality and safe food solutions. This focus on bulding consumer
trust strengthens brand loyalty for Nescaf (Nestle.com.ph).
Great Taste is the secoond largest coffee brand in the country. It is locally owned by John
Gokungweis Universal Robina Corporation. Its first product offering was the Blend 45, that would be
known as the Pinoy coffee. It gained so much popularity that it even became the largest-selling brand in
the market, even surpassing the sales of Nescaf (URC.com.ph). However, market shares began to decline
as URC continued to expand its product lines to include chips, chocolates, poultry, other drinks, etc.
Although Blend 45 still exists today, URCs main coffee brand is Great Taste. It has a 3.6% market share
in 2011. This has declined from the 5.9% share it had in 2007. This is partly due to URCs current focues
on strengthening the position of C2, given the thriving market of ready-to-drink teas. Similar to Nestls
strategy, URC offers a variety of Great Taste products to capture different market segments. These
include 3-in-1 instant flavored mixes (sachets), Great taste Granules (doy packs), Great Taste Premium
(doy packs) and Great Taste Decaf (doy packs). URC also offers a ready-to-drink variant, Coffee Twist,
to compete with Nescaf. Great Taste 3-in-1 White coffee was a very successful product innovation in
2011. Its milder and creamier taste suited Filipino taste, and has acquired good reviews
(Euromonitor.com).
Kopiko is the coffee brand of Mayorah Indah TBK Pt., an Indonesian company. It is very well-
established that it imports to over 50 countries, including New Zealand, UK, Canada, Japan, etc (Mayora,
2012). It appointed Tridharma Marketing Corporation (TMC) to be the exclusive national distributor in
the Philippines in 2005 (TriDharma). Kopikos market share has greatly improved from 1.10% inn 2007,
to 6.4% in 2011. This growing popularity is attributed to the distinct taste of its instant coffee products. It
was the first to introduce the Brown Coffee variant that makes use of brown sugar instead of white. This
makes the coffee creamier with a caramel flavoring. Among its other variants are: Kopiko Astig and
Kopiko Kopiccino (Mayora, 2012). Because of the success of this product, Nescaf and Great Taste have
introduced their own version of brown coffee (Euromonitor, 2012). Although they have available larger-
sized doy packs, its main size variant is the single-serve sachet. It targets middle and lower income
consumers.
San Mig Coffee is San Miguel Corporations main coffee brand. Its market share grew from
1.2% in 2007 to 1.7% in 2011 (Euromonitor, 2012). Like Kopiko, it strategically priced its products lower
than Nescaf, effectively capturing a part of this price sensitive market. It mainly operates in the middle
to low income consumers. As such, its main product form would be the pre-mixed (3-in-1) packed in
single-serve sachets. In 2008, its most successful product offering was the San Mig Coffee Sugar Free
mix, which was initially introduced in 2005 (San Miguel Corp). This variant is mainly differentiated by
having no cholesterol and 50% less calories. This rides on the health and wellness trend. Now, it even
offers a pro-fiber variant, as well. Like Nescaf, San Mig Coffee utilizes an exhaustive distribution
network as well, like supermarkets, groceries, convenience stores, sari-sari stores and market stalls.
Currently, it has 16 product variants: super packs (super, brown, white, chococino), 3-in-1 regular coffee
-
mixes (original, mild, strong, extra strong), 3-in-1 sugar-free coffee mixes (original, mild, strong, extra
strong), pro-health coffee (pro-fiber coffeemix with inulin fiber, pro-slim coffeemix with L-carnatine) and
100% premium instant coffee (San Miguel Purefoods).
Maxwell House is a coffee brand from Tennessee. It is sold globally in markets such as Canada,
China, France, Germany, Ireland, the Middle East, Poland, Russia, Taiwan, UK and the US. It was
brought into the Philippines on April 2002, to be sold in ready-to-drink sachet mixes. The available
variants include regular, sugar-free and rich (Mondelez International, 2012). It is manufactured by Kraft
Foods, Inc. But after the the companys split in 2012, Maxwell House now falls under Mondelez
International (Egan, 2012). Its market share declined from 3.1% in 2007 to 1.8% in 2011 (Euromonitor,
2012). Higher income and health conscious consumers are its main target.
Here is a table summarizing the prices of the 5 brands. This is based on Rustans prices:
price/sachet g/sachet cost/gram
Nescaf Original 3-in-1 4.65 14 0.33
Great Taste 3-in-1 6.00 20 0.30
Kopiko Brown 3-in-1 5.75 25 0.23
San Mig Coffee 3-in-1 3.75 14 0.27
Maxwell House 5.08 9 0.56
B. Trends
Health and Wellness Trend. This can be an opportunity for firms. They can market and develop
healthier variants (eg. Decaf and sugar-free). On the other hand, this trend coupled with the inceasing
education of consumers regarding the bad effects of coffee consumption, could be a threat to the coffee
industry (Euromonitor, 2012). These negative effects usually manifest much later in life, such as coffee
dependency, increased heart rate and blood pressure, etc (Harvard Health Publications, 2004). Thus, more
of the health conscious consumers would prefer to switch from coffee to tea, which is increasingly
gaining popularity as a healthy beverage.
Convenience. Due to the fast paced lifestyle of Filipinos, especially those who live in urban areas,
more and more Filipinos are looking for products that require a limited preparation time. This explains the
growing demand for instant pre-mixed coffee served in single-serve sachets.. The growth of the BPO
industry in the Philippines means that there are more middle-aged buyers with higher disposable income
(Euromonitor, 2012). This will positevly affect the coffee industry, especially for specialist coffee shops,
given that the nature of their work, that consists of long working hours and graveyard shifts. Breaks in
coffee shops becomes a part of their lifestyle.
Potential of younger, more adventurous demographics. As previously mentioned, coffee has
gradually become the choice beverage for younger individuals. This is a huge potential for specialty
coffee shops, like Starbucks and Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, as this market segment usually value ambiance
and flavor variety over price, as coffee shops become a venue for study and socialization. This market
also has an increasing appreciation for more sophisticated flavors, which can stimulate demand fro fresh
coffee (Euromonitor, 2012). There are around 650 specialty coffee shops in the country (2011). The
increasing number of supermarkets and malls, are seen to postively influence higher demand. Currently,
supermarkets are the largest retail distributor for fresh and instant coffee, 57% of volume sales
(Euromonitor, 2012). Malls, on the other hand, provide a perfect avenue for specialty coffee shops to
open.
-
C. Economic drivers
The economic drivers of the coffee industry in the Philippines are all about the opportunity that
the increased demand poses for the growth of the local industry in the country. The increase in demand
for coffee can be seen both within the country as well as in the countries surrounding the Philippines. This
development offers incentive to those countries with a strong coffee industry. Realizing this, the local
government has taken steps to revitalize the local coffee industry in order to take advantage of the present
opportunities.
Demand for coffee abroad has increased, most especially in China, which provides the most
relevant opportunity there is to the Philippines in terms of its coffee export industry. By 2020, it is
expected that each citizen in the mainland are expected to consume a cup of coffee a day or sipping $50
billion-worth of coffee. (Ordinario, 2012) On the other hand, local increase in demand is fuelled by two
factors. First, there has currently been tremendous growth in the business process outsourcing (BPO)
industry in the Philippines, which has led to the increase in the consumption of coffee due to the nature of
the business (graveyard shifts, long hours, etc.). (France-Presse, 2010) Second, the local increase in
demand is due to the various trends discussed in the previous section and is and will be bolstered by the
significant increase in the per capita income in the country in the past years as well as in the near future.
This is mainly caused by the increased government spending on infrastructure and social services to help
those who live along and below the poverty line in the country. The foreseen increase in per capita
income is also due to the fact that, of our total gross domestic product, the outstanding debt of the
Philippine government is now only at 50 percent as opposed to a previous 84 percent. (Remo, 2012)
D. Government - import/taxes, legislation
Given the huge potential that comes with the production of coffee within a country, like how it
helps the economy of Brazil in the present, which is the biggest producer of coffee worldwide, the
government has become very much involved in the activities surrounding coffee production in the
Philippines. In the country, there are two ways by which the government asserts its role in the coffee
industry in the Philippines. First, it regulates trade through timely directives and republic acts that aim to
improve the health of the local industry. The second way by which the government exerts its power in the
industry is through development programs that are enacted to stimulate the expansion of the local coffee
industry, which can be seen much especially in the past few years. During the 1880s, the Philippines was
one of the top coffee producers in the world which began when the Spanish brought the beans with them
into the new colonial world, as Agence France-Presse remembers in an article for ABS-CBN News. She
mentions that the Philippines is now determined to once again regain our position as a prime producer of
coffee. (France-Presse 2010) As of 2010, the Philippines only produced coffee that constitutes less then
one percent of total global production. (Global Agricultural Information Network, 2010) Clearly, if the
country wants to regain its position, it has a lot of work to do.
-
(Data sourced from www.indexmundi.com)
As can be seen in the chart above, there has been a dramatic spike in the increase of coffee
imports beginning in the year 1995. The behavior of imports illustrated above is an effect of government
policies enacted to protect and foster the growth of the Philippine coffee industry. The Philippine
government first started to assert itself in the local coffee industry back in 1960 when it released Republic
Act 2712 - An Act to Prohibit the Importation of Coffee, which was lifted in 1996 when it released
Republic Act 8178 - An Act Replacing Quntitative Import Restrictions on Agricultural Products, Except
Rice, with Tariffs, Creating the Agricutural Competitiveness Enhancement Fund, and for Other Purposes.
These two republic acts, as illustrated in the chart above, dramatically affected coffee trade in the country.
From 1960 - 1996, there was really almost no importation of coffee products at all. This was done in
order to stimulate local production of coffee in the country. However, the government decided to change
its approach to redulating the coffee industry in the country and decided to remove the ban of coffee
imports and replace it with a tiered tarriff system. Within the quota, the tarriffs would decline to 45% in
2000 from 50% in 1996. Outside the quota, it would decline from 100% to 60%. This seems to be in
response to the increasing local demand for coffee, which could not be addressed by local production.
President Aquino mentioned in an interview that, currently, Nestle, which is the biggest player in the local
coffee industry, sources 80% of its coffee from outside the country. (Aquino Commits, 2012) In the
country alone, there is a demand of up to 120,000 tonnes annually, while local production has been
pegged at only around 25,000 tonnes per year. (Olchondra, 2012) The government relies on the Bureau of
Import Services when it comes to the implementation of these directives.
In its effort to regain self-sufficiency and once again become a net exporter of coffee in the
future, the government has also place institutions and programs in order to foster the local industry. As a
part of the International Coffee Organization (ICO), an institution whose member countries collaborate to
tackle issues regarding the world coffee industry, the Philippine government has put up the International
Coffee Organization Certifying Agency (ICOCA) in order to provide service and support to the local
coffee export industry in an attempt to revive local production. Given the huge amount of coffee imported
into the country, it certainly will be a big boost to the economy for us to first be self-sufficient. Towards
this goal, President Aquino has included the planting of coffee in his National Greening Program, which
he started in 2011. The program is essentially a big reforestation program that aims to grow 1.5 billion
0
500
1000
1500
2000
25001
96
0
19
63
19
66
19
69
19
72
19
75
19
78
19
81
19
84
19
87
19
90
19
93
19
96
19
99
20
02
20
05
20
08
20
11
Green Coffee Imports (1,000 60kg Bags)
Green Coffee Imports (1,00060kg Bags)
-
trees in 1.5 million hectares nationwide within the time period of 2011 to 2016. (National Greening
Program, 2013) With a big effort at planting a huge amount of coffee comes government support in the
form of the National Convergence Initiative, a collaboration between the Department of Agriculture,
Department of Agrarian Reform, and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The
initiative aims to pool the resources and strengths of the three government arms in order to foster
sustainable rural development of the Philippines countryside. The initiative was started in 1999 and,
unfortunately, has yielded lackluster benefits for two reasons. The fragmented delivery of services to the
countryside and the fact that the beneficiaries of the program, farmers, fisherfold, and indigenous groups,
remained underdeveloped. Seeing this, President Aquino revamped the program to create that aims to fill
the gaps of the previous program and go for incremental but sustainable and holistic development that
aims to integrate the people with the development of their local economies. (Enhanced DA-DAR-DENR
Convergence, 2013)
IV. Coffee Economics
Supply and Demand
There is a growing demand for coffee in the Philippines, specifically for coffee mixes
(Euromonitor International 2012). Despite the inflation rates during the year 2011, all the more did the
players in the industry try to innovate with their coffee mixes, offering 3-in-1, 4-in-1 and even 5-in-1
blends. Also, industry players like Kopiko and San Mig Coffee have started to focus on lower-priced
brands, tapping the more price-conscious low-income segment of consumers, and in turn boosting their
consumption (Euromonitor International 2012). We see here how the demand for coffee has been
stimulated precisely by the introduction and innovation of coffee variants. And more particularly, it were
those coffee mixes which contained brown sugar (instead of the usual white) which saw an increase in
demand from the low-income segment (Euromonitor International 2012). On the one hand, these
innovations include and encourage more people to participate in the demand for coffee, even in the face
of higher than expected inflation. Also, even with the increase of 4% on the unit price of coffee, an
inflation rate of 5% in 2011, and an increase in input prices of sugar, the major players have still handed
down these costs increments to consumers at the lowest possible price as to not hurt demand
(Euromonitor International 2012). So on the other hand, you also have the conscious effort of the
manufacturers to let the shocks of inflation be absorbed gently by the consumers.
But in the face of growing demand, and also an increased production of coffee, supply has not
been able to keep up with this growth. Because of the more strenuous and prolonged working hours,
coffee has become almost a necessary commodity to the daily life of the Filipino. The demand for coffee
beans in general is still continuing to grow, and it is mostly local. As you can see, we are really a nation
of coffee drinkers, and there are now more people working almost 24/7 who end up drinking coffee, says
Ms. Pacita U. Juan, Philippine Coffee Board Chairman (de la Fuente 2012). She also stated that this
demand for coffee is increasing in proportion to the growing population, more than production (Keith
2012). And so apart from the coffee mixes, a bulk of this demand is also attributed to the local cafs that
integrate Arabica and Robusta varieties to their beverages.
-
In 2011, coffee production was 88,526.09 MT, a huge dip from the 94,536.01 MT of 2010 (de la
Fuente 2012). The 88,526.09 MT consists mostly of the production of 62,978.41 MT of Coffee Robusta
(a 7% decrease from the prior years 67,933.06 MT) and 19,002.27 MT of Coffee Arabica (as compared
to the prior years 19,420.53 MT) (de la Fuente 2012). These production figures fall short from the local
demand of 75,000 to 120,000 MT of coffee annually, leaving the Philippines a supply gap of 31,473.91
MT (de la Fuente 2012) for the year 2011. Over the past 10 years, coffee production only held an average
of 25,000 MT (Olchondra 2012). Currently, the Philippines is importing P9.5-billion for coffee, because
of the supply gaps that it has to fill (Olchondra 2012).
V. Market Structure
The market sturcture of the coffee industry is two prongit is a combination of monopolistic
competition and oligopoly. On the one hand, Nestl holds a staggering amount of 87% of the share of the
market, consistent throughout the years, garnering an almost monopolistic status (Euromonitor
International 2012). But on the other hand, despite its dominance in the market, it does not have full
contol over prices, as the other players are also able to set prices for themselves because of the different
market segments they cater to, as well as the variety that the innovations are allowing the industry players
to differentiate on, and therefore, set their own prices. It is under monopolistic competition because you
have other industry players, with roughly the same size (except Nestl) who are competing based on a
differentiation of products. But at the same time, it can also be under an oligopoly, because of the
dominance of Nestl and the good prospects of growth (although currently small now) for the other
market players such as Universal Robina Corp, Mayora Indah Tbk PT, and San Miguel Super Coffee.
Monopolistic Competition
The characteristics of a monopolistic competition that the Philippine coffee industry encompasses
are the following: 1) the existence of a large number of firms, 2) differentiated products, 3) some
influence over the price, and 4) non-price competition.
As we have seen earlier, there is a great demand for coffee in the Philippines, and the market for
it is huge. Hence, we could conclude that the industry consists of many buyers, a characteristic of a
monopolistic competition. Also, the industry has a large number of firms, and if we inspect the coffee
scene further, there are a significant number of industry players that are of more or less equal size. Taking
aside the size of Nestl, the other playersUniversal Robina Corp., Mayora Indah Tbk PT, San Miguel
Super Coffee Mix Co. and Kraft Food Phils Inc.all hold a share of market that is below 4%. These
other players are still able to significantly able to gain a share of the market and remain competitive
because of the markets size and the leeway for product differentiation afforded by innovating on coffee
mixes.
Let us then elaborate on product differentiation. There are three kinds of product differentiation
that the coffee industry is engaged in. First is physical product differentiation, where we find the different
competitors set themselves apart through the size of their packets, their packaging design, their color
themes, and most importantly, the tweaking of blends, although the main takeaway from their products
are the samewhich is to satisfy the caffeine fix of the consumers. For instance, other manufacturers
tried to tap the health conscious segment, creating blends such as Boncaf Decaffeinated, Maxwell House
3-in-1 Sugar Free and Illy Espresso Decaffeinated (Euromonitor International 2012). Firms have been
-
trying to consistently widen their lines of instant specialty coffee, to cater to the different taste buds of
customers, who are looking for a variety of coffee blends (Euromonitor International 2012). So instead
of just having just around three blends, firms are now offering blends for every Filipino. Next, is
marketing differentiation. This is where firms differentiate based on distinct packaging and promotional
strategies. That is to say, it is in branding and brand building that most of these firms use to convey a
sense of uniqueness, and it is where they try to set their brand apart from the other. For instance, Nescaf
has long owned the color red for all of its brands, while San Miguel is able to capitalize on the quality and
consistency that have been proven by its other products. Also, Nescafs tagline of Para Kanino Ka
Gumigising? has greatly distinguished it from the rest. It also separates itself by creating online contests
and even sponsoring music festivals. This is exactly why the coffee industry is characterized by non-price
competition, because it wins customers over not through price, but through advertisement costs. The last
kind of product differentiation is human capital differentiation, wherein the firm differentiates through the
skills and the level of training of its employees. This is particularly clear for Nestl wherein it stresses to
create quality relationships especially with their coffee farmers, different from the supplier relationships
of other industry players.
The industry players also have some influence in price. Despite the dominance of Nestls market
share, we should not be fooled that it operates almost like a monopoly. On the contrary, despite its size,
Nestl does not have complete control, or even dominant control on the prices released in the market. Our
industry leader, Nescaf, does not fix price. Other industry players, although small, are still able to haggle
for prices. This is due to the slight differences of their product offerings, as seen in the slight difference of
mixes and branding. And it is this dynamic that makes the coffee industry on the one hand, under
monopolistic competition, because in a monopolistic competition, firms cannot fix price, but can
influence price. Most of the firms still do competitive pricing, because the prices of the different firms are
close to each other; but they still differ by small amounts, accounted for by product differentiation.
Short Term and Long Term Graphs for Monopolistic Competition (Source: EconomicsOnline UK)
-
Oligopoly
After having discussed monopolistic competition, there are still some characteristics of the coffee
industry of the Philippines that belong under an oligopoly: 1) relatively constant prices, 2) high barriers to
entry, 3) high advertising and selling costs.
The most important characteristic that the coffee industry has under oligopoly is its high barriers
to entry. Barriers to entry generally mean the high start-up costs and other hindrances that prevent new
players from entering the industry. These include things such as high plant and factory investment, R&D
costs, established brand capital etc. For instance, players in the coffee industry have already invested high
amounts of capital and already gained considerable economies of scale throughout the years.
Nestl currently is the largest buyer of coffee in the Philippines, purchasing 80% of the
Philippines entire coffee production (The Manila Times 2012). Such a dominant players have huge
haggling power over its suppliers, and in fact, farmers are trapped in the low prices that Nestl and
Universal Robina Corp. dictate (Alave 2012). Other players, like San Miguel Corporation, even have to
tie up with international firms (because the supply of coffee here in the Philippines is dominated by
Nestl and URC) hence going into a joint venture with the Singaporean Company, Super Coffee Mix
Manufacturing (Euromonitor 2012).
For instance, Nestl has just opened its newly completed Nestl Lipa Integrated Commercial
Center in Batangas, a five-hectare, P25 million facility that serves as a one-stop shop for coffee farmers
(The Manila Times 2012). In fact, it even has plans of expanding its instant coffee-making facilities,
investing some $160 million (Banal 2012). Even if acquiring the beans is not that difficult (as some
independent coffee sellers are able to do this as well), having the factories and facilities to process the
coffee in massive quantities requires a huge amount of capital. Also, as said earlier, it is important in this
industry to innovate to differentiate and offer a wider array of coffee mixes to choose from. Thus, along
with the high capital investment, industry players also need a strong research and development arm,
which taps into the market preferences and uses these to come up with new products. For instance,
Nescafs success is attributed mostly to its new line of Italian coffee flavors (Euromonitor International
2012). Kopiko on the other hand captures the taste buds of middle to lower-income consumers, with their
Kopiko Brown (coffee, brown sugar and cream) served in one package, and it is this innovation that
allowed Mayorah Indah to garner the fastest off-trade value sales growth of 26% in coffee in 2011
(Euromonitor International 2012).
Brand equity can also be considered as an obstacle. Nescaf has in fact established itself as
synonymous with coffee and coffee mixes in the Philippines. And this is important to note, especially in
an industry wherein customers identify themselves with the brand. This is again connected to the high
advertising and selling costs, because the different industry players go for aggressive advertising as a way
to differentiate themselves from other brands. Distribution chains are also considered to be barriers to
entry, because getting a product into these network means having to go through FDA approvals and
accreditation, before it is allowed to go into the major retail channels such as supermarkets. For instance,
parameters for instant coffee include moisture content, caffeine content, ash content, and pH level (FDA
1985).
-
Also, in the competition in the coffee industry, prices are kept relatively constant. If there are
increases in price, it will be just a small amount, and usually because of some extra quality feature. Firms
in the industry dont battle it out with price, but with features. For instance, we mentioned a while ago the
success of Mayorah Indahs Kopiko Brown. Other insant major coffee brands, namely Nescaf and Great
Taste soon followed suit with this trend, trying to copy in their own way the success of Kopiko by
introducing brown coffee variants (Euromonitor 2012).
Among the two market structures, it seems to be that although it has many facets of a
monopolistic competition, there are hints that the industry has been slowly been tending towards an
oligopoly. This is because of the good outlooks for growth or URC, San Miguel and Mayorah Indah,
already threatening the long-standing dominance of Nestl. For instance, Kopikos brand volume shares
have grown from 1.10% to 6.40% from 2007 to 2011 (Euromonitor 2012). Also, consumers are slowly
starting to explore and embrace the different brands.
(Source:EconomicsOnline UK)
VI. Conclusions and Recommendations
From the economic perspective, the coffee industry in the Philippines was initially a form of
monopolistic competition wherein the industry was dominated by a particularly strong player: Nestle
through its coffee brand, Nescafe co-existing with other minor players. However, recent events indicate
the rise of competition from companies such as San Miguel which have started increasing its market share
of the industry thus changing the field into an oligopolistic competition wherein Nestle dominates the
market but whose prices still affected by the growing competition which primarily composed of major
players. Minor players still play a role in the industry but are not influential enough to affect market
prices.
Knowing the economic structure of the coffee industry and the nature of oligopolistic
competition, is it even recommended for a minor player to stay or enter into the business? In order to
understand the coffee industry further, the application of Porters five forces may be necessary to gain
better insights into the industry. Porters five forces is a framework commonly used for business analysis
of an industry in order to determine its attractiveness. Porters five forces highlights the importance of
-
these five factors: 1) Threat of new competition; 2) Threat of substitute products; 3) Bargaining power of
customers (buyers); 4) Bargaining power of suppliers and 5) Intensity of competitive rivalry.
A. Porters Five Forces
Threat of New Entrants: Low
Oligopolistic structure prevents minor players from gaining large market
shares.
Large players already have economies of scale and there are high capital
requirement to enter the industry.
Entry cost is high.
There is high product differentiation.
There is low switching cost for buyers since stiff competition means
competitive prices but effect is
mitigated by brand loyalty and strong
marketing campaigns.
Rivalry amongst Existing Firms: High
5 main players in the industry competing on the basis of price and
brand loyalty.
Most main competition are large companies that are rivals in size.
The industry growth rate is around 3.1%
Buyers have high switching costs due to similarity in pricing.
Determinants of Buyer Power:
High
High product differentiation
Low switching cost for the buyer
Multiple product sources available
Product is a luxury item
High volume of consumption
Determinants of Supplier Power:
Low
Supplier concentration is low
Availability of substitute input is high due to foreign
competition
Supplier input is important to firms but easily sourced
Suppliers product differentiation is low
Threat of Substitute Products: High
Substitute products include: tea, soda, energy drinks.
Relative price is mostly similar or sometimes cheaper than coffee.
Relative quality of substitute also has grades similar to coffee.
-
Thus in effect, Porters five forces attempt to explain that the coffee industry is currently
unattractive for the minor player to enter into due to the oligopolistic nature of the industry wherein
strong players dominate and control the industry through dictation of prices and economies of scale. At
the same time, buyer power is high hence consolidating market share poses a challenge for the minor
player who is without the resources of the major players thus unable to compete in mainstream marketing
which requires large investments. This in the end entails that if no major change is attempted by either the
minor players, local suppliers or the government then the current situation in the coffee industry will
remain at status quo due to the overall unattractiveness of the coffee industry to entering and staying
players.
There are two methods in confronting this challenge of overcoming the status quo. First is an
attempt of product differentiation wherein the minor player has the opportunity of aiming at a niche
market instead of the market segments widely targeted by dominant players. In the coffee industry, there
are new emerging markets such as the specialty coffee market and the sustainable coffee market with
niche markets such as organic, shade grown and fair trade coffee. A fair example of a potential niche
market in the Philippines is the Cordillera fair trade coffee which reflects the consumer trend of
increasing health-consciousness as well as concern as to the origin of their food. While initially positioned
for the high-end market, fair trade coffee has started to penetrate the low-end market segment as well as
the health-consciousness trend spreads.(NICCEP, 2010) Second is to establish macroeconomic as well as
microeconomics policies that aim to address the issue of oligopoly in the coffee industry through the
creation of tariffs, taxes, subsidies and so on for the macroeconomic side and an exploration
of alternatives for the microeconomic side such as micro financing and the creation of cooperatives that
could capitalize on the funds gained from micro financing.
Utilizing the information revealed by Porter's five forces, the group has realized that one of the
main reasons why major companies still hold dominant market shares is due to the financial resources
available to them. Given that mainstream marketing has been one of the main distribution channels in the
coffee industry, minor players have little chance of penetrating the coffee market. There are four ways in
which the Philippine government could establish a macroeconomic intervention. Firstly, any intervention
made by the government will have to aim at strengthening the local suppliers through increasing
the financial capabilities of minor players in the local scene given that many factors that determine local
pricing are in the hands of major players. Secondly, It is also important for the government to stimulate
local coffee production in the country given that the country is currently experiencing high coffee imports
to counter the low local production of coffee by giving more incentives to local farmers such as financial
grants for coffee seedlings or for equipment that will enable farmers to increase their yield or to sell for a
higher prices, for example roasted coffee sells at a premium compared to green coffee beans.(Alave,
2012) Thirdly, on the international front, the government should start increasing tariffs in order to inhibit
foreign competition such as Vietnam or Taiwan from entering the Philippine coffee market. Finally, the
government could also aim at reducing local demand for coffee by establishing higher taxes for coffee
products given that these would have a stronger effect on consumer surplus due to high demand or
by introducing a price floor for coffee higher than current market prices which will still largely impact on
consumer surplus.
On the microeconomic side, there is a variety of alternatives available to both minor players as
well as local suppliers to ensure financial stability in the face of dominant players which dictate the
-
market price. For the minor players and local suppliers, profit maximization and cost minimization
through economies of scope and scale can increase profit without restoring to drastic measures. Given that
local production is low, reducing fixed costs may help local farmers achieve lower average costs through
equilibrium.
Finally on the business side, the minor players alternatively can prioritize niche marketing over
mainstream marketing which will allow them to avoid direct competition with the major players in the
industry as well as profit from an untapped market. As mentioned before, a potential niche market in the
Philippines is the Cordillera fair trade coffee; another possible niche market would be the Civet coffee.
(NICCEP, 2010) In terms of increasing financial capabilities, government as well as non-government aid
can boost finances through grants and partnerships which can go a long way in mitigating high entry costs
incurred by participating in the industry. An option for private aid is also possible through micro
financing which is available to companies as well as cooperatives on the part of local farmers. For the
local suppliers, same alternatives apply, differentiated products through different types of coffee beans
grown and application for financial aid in order to address expenses such as equipment, transportation and
etc.
In conclusion, while the Philippine coffee industry is currently oligopolistic with the right
government interventions as well as the use of proper economic and business strategies by both minor
players and suppliers, it is possible to overturn the current economic structure. This would entail effort
from both fronts as players and suppliers have to assert themselves in the local scene against dominant
players which seek to manipulate market prices and in the international scene where foreign competitors
are more capable of supplying demand for coffee. Hence while the industry is currently seen as
unattractive, there is still hope of becoming profitable in the future.
-
Bibliography
Ang, P. (2009) Philippine Coffee Annual. Global Agricultural Information Report. Retrieved February 18,
2013, from http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Coffee%20Annual
_Manila_Philippines_4-27-2010.pdf
Alave, K. (2012) Philippine Coffee Farmers Trapped by Nestles Low Buying Price. Preda Foundation, Inc. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from http://www.preda.org/en/news/human-rights/philippine-
coffee-farmers-trapped-by-nestles-low-buying-price/
Austria, M. (2002) The Philippines in the Global Trading Environment: Looking Back and the Road
Ahead. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from
http://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps0215.pdf
Avillanosa, G. (2012) The 10 Step Marketing Plan for Nescaf. Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, from
http://www.slideshare.net/glad_u_smile/10-step-marketing-plan-for-nescafe-15085363
"Aquino Commits to Assist Coffee Industry." SunStar. N.p., 24 Feb. 2012. Web. 18 Feb. 2013.
Banal, Conrado. "Brood coffee." 18 June 2012. Philippine Daily Inquirer. 19 February 2013
.
Bayani, O. (2012) Nescafe Recruits Viral Stars In Latest TVCs, The art & Science of Connecting with
Consumers: Marketing-Interactive.com, 08 Nov. 2012, Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013.
http://marketing-interactive.com/news/36525
Cahiles-Magkilat, B. (2012) PPP Coffee Production, Devt Pushed. The Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/375904/ppp-coffee-production-dev-t-
pushed#.USG_7KUUErU
COCAFM. (2011) The Coffee Industry, Congressional Oversight Committee on Agricultural and
Fisheries Modernization. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://cocafm.gov.ph/wp-
content/uploads/downloads/2011/02/Coffee.pdf
COCAFM. "The Coffee Industry: Performance, Policies, Strategic Directions." 2011. 17 February 2012
.
Coffee Health Risks: For the moderate drinker, coffee is safe says Harvard Womens Health Watch (2004) Harvard Health Publications, Harvard Medical School, Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013.
http://www.health.harvard.edu/press_releases/coffee_health_risk
De la Fuente, F. (2012) Coffee industry targeting more areas for production. Business World Online.
Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=21&title=
Coffee-industry-targeting-more-areas-for-production&id=57977
Despuez, O. (2012) Philippines allots P192-M for coffee, cacao production to ride on 'mocha trend'.
Interaksyon. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.interaksyon.com/business/46707
/philippines-allots-p192-m-for-coffee-cacao-production-to-ride-on-mocha-trend
Economics Online UK. "Monopolistic Competition." Economics Online UK. 1. 19 February 2013
.
-
. "Oligopoly." Economics Online UK. 19 February 2013 .
Egan, M. (2012) After Breakup, Kraft, Mondelez Embark on Separate Paths, Fox Business, Accessed on
16 Feb. 2013, http://www.foxbusiness.com/industries/2012/10/02/kraft-mondelez-to-trade-as-
separate-companies/
"Enhanced DA-DAR-DENR Convergence." Department of Agrarian Reform, n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2013.
Euromonitor International. "Coffee in the Philippines." 2012.
. "San Miguel Super Coffee Mix Co in Hot Drinks (Philippines)." 2012.
Fairtrade Foundation. (2012) Fairtrade and Coffee: Commodity Briefing. Retrieved February 18, 2013,
from http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/2012/F/FT_Coffee_Report_
May2012.pdf
Food and Drugs Administration. "Standard for Instant Coffee." 18 November 1985. Food and Drugs
Administration Philippines. 19 February 2013 .
France-Presse, Agence. "Philippines Looking to Revive Coffee Industry." ABS-CBN News. ABS-CBN, 14
Feb. 2010. Web. 18 Feb. 2013.
GMA News Network. (2011) Nestle Phils. to buy more coffee from PHL farmers. GMA News Online.
Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/239899/economy/
agricultureandmining/nestle-phils-to-buy-more-coffee-from-phl-farmers
Goldschein, E. (2011) 11 Incredible Facts About The Global Coffee Industry. Business Insider. Retrieved
February 18, 2013, from http://www.businessinsider.com/facts-about-the-coffee-industry-2011-
11?op=1
Global Agricultural Information Network. (2010) Philippines Coffee Annual. USDA Foreign Agricultural
Service. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from
http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Coffee%20Annual_Manila_Philippine
s_4-27-2010.pdf
Hot Drinks in the Philippines Market Forecast & Consumer Demographics. (2008) Research and Markets, Web. 16 Feb. 2013.
James (2012) Socioeconomic classes (SEC) ABCDE: Percentage of population, PinoyMoneyTalk.com,
Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013.
Keith, G. (2012) Coffee production falls short of demand. The Manila Times. Retrieved February 18,
2013, from http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/news/regions/26588-coffee-production-falls-
short-of-demand
Mayorah Indah. (2012) Mayora Products. Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, http://www.mayora.com/
McCann Worldgroup-MRM Triumphs with Agency of the Year Digital Excellence Award. (2012) Philippine Association od Nationwide Advertisers, Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013,
http://www.pana.com.ph/links/ind-10-2012.php
-
Mondelez International (2012) Maxwell House Coffee. Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013,
www.mondelezinternational.com/ph/
"National Greening Program." National Greening Program. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2013.
Nescafe launches first global campaign for younger consumers. (2001) Philippine Star Lifestyle, July 8, 2001. Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, http://www.philstar.com/sunday-life/86088/nescafe-launches-
first-global-campaign-younger-consumers
Nestl Philippines, Inc. (2012) About Us. Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, www.nestl.com
NICCEP. (2010) The Philippine Coffee Industry Cluster. National Industry Cluster Capacity
Enhancement Project. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.niccep.dti.gov.ph/
cluster.php?code=7
Olchondra, R. (2012) Coffee mixes spur rise in local demand, Philippine Daily Inquirer, October 31,
2012.
Olchondra, Riza T. "Coffee giants tapped for industry roadmap." 5 October 2012. Philippine Daily
Inquirer. 17 February 2013 .
Ordinario, Cai. "China Attractive Market for Philippine Coffee." Rappler. N.p., 9 Sept. 2012. Web. 18
Feb. 2013.
Remo, Michelle V. "Per Capita Income to Rise Significantly, Says BSP." Inquirer Business. The
Philippine Inquirer, 29 June 2012. Web. 18 Feb. 2013.
San Miguel Corporation (2012) Archives. Accesssed on 16 Feb. 2013, www.sanmiguel.com.ph
San Miguel Purefoods (2012) San Mig Coffee. Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, www.sanmiguelpurfoods.com
TAO Community of Companies (2012) About Tridharma: Our Subsidiaries Distribution and Marketing,
Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, http://www.taocommunity.com/company/tridharma
The Manila Times. "Nestle Philippines opens new coffee center in Batangas." 21 August 2012. The
Manila Times. 19 February 2013 .
Universal Robina Corporation (2012) Company History, Accessed on 16 Feb. 2013, www2.urc.com.ph