co sorption by hydrotalcite-like compounds in dry and wet ......email:[email protected] 13th...
TRANSCRIPT
-
CO2 sorption by hydrotalcite-like compounds in dry and wet conditions
Alessandro Poliandria, Francesca Michelia, Katia Galluccia, Leucio Rossib, Pier Ugo Foscoloa
aDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of L’Aquila Email: [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b Department of Physical and Chemical Science, University of L’Aquila Email:[email protected]
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MULTIPHASE FLOW IN INDUSTRIAL PLANTS
SESTRI LEVANTE (GENOVA), ITALY - 17-19 SEPTEMBER 2014
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
-
Overview
• Aims of the work
• Introduction:
• SEWGS application in gasification and IGCC processes
• Materials: hydrotalcite-like compounds
• Results:
• Kinetic study: TG-DTA signals
• Characterisation before tests: XRD and FT-IR analysis
• Experimental apparatus: PSA plant
• Capture tests: model approach
• Characterisation after tests: XRD and FT-IR analysis
• Conclusions
2
MFIP 2014
-
Aims of the work
• The objective is to assess the feasibility of the Sorption-Enhanced Water−Gas Shift and Reforming Process (SEWGS and SERP)
▫ for an IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle)
▫ and for Coal Gasification processes through a suitable material for CO2 capture,
▫ and in case for H2S capture, at typical WGS (Water Gas Shift) and Tar reforming conditions.
• Synthesized materials are experimentally tested in a Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) laboratory scale plant
3
MFIP 2014
-
• CO from the gasification syngas has to be converted into H2 and CO2 via WGS reaction.
• In SEWGS, the equilibrium of the reaction is shifted to the product side by using a CO2 sorbent.
4
MFIP 2014
IGCC Power production with CO2 capture by SEWGS. Power is generated by gas turbines
(GT) and steam turbines (ST), heat is recovered for steam generation (HRSG).
(from ECN website)
Coal
Air/O2
Steam Syngas
generation SEWGS
Power
generation
GT
HRSG
ST
CO2
Power
Decarbonized
H2 fuel
-
Introduction
• Global emissions of anthropogenic CO2 and other greenhouse gases (GHG) increase significantly global warming effect.
▫ global CO2 emissions must be reduced of 50-80% within 2050 [IPCC]
• Technologies for carbon-emission-free energy production (CCT) are currently under development, as CO2 capture and storage (CCS).
▫ R&D aim is reducing the fuel costs which are mainly due to
low efficiency of CO2 capture
capital costs of capture process equipments.
5
MFIP 2014
-
• CO2 capture process can use three different decarbonization techniques:
▫ pre-combustion,
▫ post-combustion,
▫ oxyfuel combustion
• Pre-combustion advantages:
▫ Higher CO2 partial pressure
▫ Lower treated gas volume
▫ Smaller facilities
▫ Integration of pre-combustion CO2 capture within WGS reactor (Sorption Enhanced WGS).
• In case of adsorption of CO2 coupled with WGS, the operating window is 250-400°C.
6
MFIP 2014
Introduction
-
Project Name Location Feedstock Size MW
Status
Puertollano Spain Coal 14 Operational Sept. 2010
Buggenum Netherlands Coal 20 Operational May 2011
Polk FL, USA Coal 0.3 Mt/yr Operational Apr. 2014
SOTACARBO Carbonia (Italy) Coal-Waste 0.4 Planning
ENEA Rome (Italy) Coal 0.3 Planning
7
Project Name Location Feedstock Size MW Status
Schwarze Pumpe
Germany Coal 30 Operational Sept. 2008
Compostilla Spain Coal 30 Operated 2009-2012
Lacq France Oil 35 Operational 2010
Callide-A Oxy Fuel
Australia Coal 30 Operational Dec.2012
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index_pilots.html
Pilot pre-combustion CCS Projects
Pilot oxy-combustion CCS Projects
MFIP 2014
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/puertollanto.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/buggenum.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/polk.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/polk.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/polk.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/polk.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/polk.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/vattenfall_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/vattenfall_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/compostilla.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/total_lacq.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/callide_a_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/callide_a_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/callide_a_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/callide_a_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/callide_a_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/callide_a_oxyfuel.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index_pilots.html
-
Pilot post-combustion CCS Projects
Project Name Location Feedstock Size MW Status
ECO2 Burger OH, USA Coal 1 Operated 2008- 2010
Pleasant Prairie WI, USA Coal 5 Operated 2008-2009
AEP Mountaineer WV, USA Coal 30 Operated 2009-2011
Karlshamn Sweden Oil 5 Operated 2009-2010
Jilin China Nat. Gas 0.2 Mt/yr Operational 2009
Shidongkou China Coal 0.1 Mt/yr Operational 2011
Brindisi Italy Coal 48 Operational Mar. 2011
Ferrybridge UK Coal 5 Operational Nov.2012
Mongstad Norway Gas 0.1 Mt/yr Operational May 2012
Plant Barry AL, USA Coal 25 Operational Aug 2012
Aberthaw Wales, UK Coal 3 Operational Jan. 2013
Boryeong Station South Korea Coal 10 Operational May 2013
Big Bend Station FL, USA Coal 1 Planning
8
MFIP 2014
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/berger.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/pleasant_prairie.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/pleasant_prairie.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/pleasant_prairie.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/aep_alstom_mountaineer.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/eon_karlshamn.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/jilin.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/shidongkou.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/enel_1.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/sse_ferrybridge.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/statoil_mongstad.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/plant_barry.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/aberthaw.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/kepco.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/kepco.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/kepco.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/big_bend.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/big_bend.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/big_bend.htmlhttp://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/big_bend.html
-
Introduction • State-of-the-art of EU programs:
▫ CACHET II (Carbon dioxide capture and hydrogen production with membranes)
▫ CAESAR (CArbon-free Electricity by SEWGS: Advanced materials, Reactor-, and process design) pilot plant installation (35 ton CO2/day) with K-HTC
sorbent, called ALKASORB1. ▫ ASCENT2 (Advanced Solid Cycles with Efficient Novel
Technologies) efficiency of carbon removal of pre-combustion capture
(electricity efficiency up to 52%) cost of CO2 avoided of about 35€/t.
9
MFIP 2014
1Jansen, D., Selow, E.R. van, Cobden, P.D., Manzolini, G., Macchi, E., Gazzani, M., Blom, R., Pakdel Henriksen, P., Beavis, R., Wright, A., ( 2013 ). Energy Procedia, 37, 2265– 2273 2 http://ascentproject.eu/
http://ascentproject.eu/
-
Introduction
MFIP 2014
10
• A wide range of properties are required for sorbent materials to achieve an industrially feasible process: ▫ high sorbent capacity; ▫ high selectivity; ▫ good mechanical strength; ▫ stable adsorption capacity after cycles; ▫ adequate adsorption/desorption kinetics under
operating conditions; ▫ regenerability of sorbent without extreme temperature
and pressure conditions; ▫ tolerance to the presence of water and impurities (H2S,
NH3, HCl);
-
Materials: hydrotalcite-like compounds
11
• Synthesis method1,2: low supersaturation @ pH= 8÷10
• Thermal treatments: drying at 120°C for 24 h, calcination at 700°C or 450°C for 8 h.
• Incipient wet impregnation with K2CO3 (20%w)
MFIP 2014
1Narayanan, S. and Krishna, K., (1998). Applied Catalysis A: General, 174(1-2), 221-229. 2 Gallucci, K., Micheli, F., Parabello, L., Rossi, L. and Foscolo, P.U., (2014). GPE – 4th International Congress on Green Process Engineering, 7-10 April 2014, Sevilla (Spain)
-
Sample identification Composition Calcination temperature
HT1-700 Mg : Al = 2 : 1
700°C
HT2-700 Ca : Al = 2 : 1
HT3-700 Mg : Ca : Al = 1 : 1 : 1
HT1K-700 HT1 + K2CO3 (20%w)
HT2K-700 HT2 + K2CO3 (20%w)
HT3K-700 HT3 + K2CO3 (20%w)
HT1-450 Mg : Al = 2 : 1
450°C HT3-450 Mg : Ca : Al = 1 : 1 : 1
HT1K-450 HT1 + K2CO3 (20%w)
HT3K-450 HT3 + K2CO3 (20%w)
12
Materials: tested sorbents MFIP 2014
-
13
MFIP 2014
Kinetic study: TG-DTA signals
n = 1.26 · S½
Reaction order
Activation energy
TG-DTA Linseis L81 analyser with L40/2053 gas flow control system
-
Results
14
MFIP 2014
Decomposed compound
Temperature range (°C)
Reaction order Activation energy (kcal/mol)
HT1 HT2 HT3 HT1 HT2 HT3
Water 70-190 n.a. 1.06 - n.a. 8.36 -
R1 190-280 0.79 0.69 - 19.4 24.6 -
R2 280-405 0.43 - 58.2 -
Carbonates 850-1000 - 1.65 1.51 - 205 216
R1: Dehydroxilation of Al-OH R2: Decomposition of Mg(OH)2 superimposed to CO2 release
-
XDR characterisation before tests
15
XRD patterns of: (a) dry HT1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
2θ
(a)
*
**
**
**
*
*
*
*: Hydrotalcite
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
2θ
(b)
(c)
(d)
Δ
Δ
ΔΔ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
ΔΔ
Δ: Periclase
x: Aluminum Oxide
■: Dawsonite, potassic
x
x
x
Δ
XRD patterns of: (b) HT1-700, (c) HT1-450, (d) HT1K-450
MFIP 2014
PANanalyticalX'Pert PRO XRD diffractometer
-
16
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
In
ten
sit
y [
a.u
.]
2θ
(a)
(b)
(c)
: Calcium carbonate
+: Aragonite●: Aluminum Hydroxide
: Lime
#: Calcium Hydroxide
- : Mayenite^: Calcium Aluminum Oxide Hydrate
' : Calcium Oxide
: Potassium Calcium Carbonate
○
○
○○
○
○ ○
○○
○
○○○
○ ○+
++++
++++++
++ +++
○ ○ ○
#
###
##
#
#
#
----
-
-
----
-
--- - --^ ^^^^^^^
^''
'- -
XRD patterns of: (a) dry HT2, (b), HT2-700, (c) HT2K-700
XRD patterns of: (a) dry HT3, (b), HT3-700, (c) HT3-450,
(d) HT3K-700, (e) HT3K-450
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
2θ
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
***
*●*
#'
######
'''
'
ΔΔ
◊ ◊◊◊ ◊ ◊~~
*: Hydrotalcite
: Calcium Carbonate
●: Aluminum Hydroxide
Δ: Periclase
#: Calcium Hydroxide
~: Aluminum Oxide Hydroxide
' : Calcium Oxide
: Potassium Calcium Carbonate
'
MFIP 2014
-
FT-IR analysis before tests
17
MFIP 2014
IR Vibration [cm-1] samples after drying
1400-1600 Carbonate area
2700-4000 Physically adsorbed water Vibration of OH- groups
HT1 HT2 HT3 “Free anion” 1415: asymmetric stretching 880: out of plane deformation 680: in plane deformation (Busca e Lorenzelli, 1982) 2510: C-O stretching mode of calcite (Andersen and Brecevic, 1991)
1348 2507 2507
867 1014 1380
657 711 1014
871 854
640
IR Vibration [cm-1] samples after calcination
HT1 HT2 HT3 1535-1430: asymmetric stretching of carbonates (Walspurger et al. 2008) OH- stretching of Ca(OH)2 (Fernández-Carrasco L et al. 2012)
1400 1475
1405 1452
1405 1452
3641 3641
ThermoNicolet FT-IR Nexus 870 spectrophotometer
-
Experimental apparatus: PSA plant
18
Flowsheet of the laboratory scale plant: 1: evaporator; 2: microreactor; 3: electric furnace; 4: chiller; 5: analyser.
MFIP 2014
-
Capture tests: operating conditions
19
Dry tests Wet tests
Adsorption Regeneration Adsorption Regeneration
Temperature 350°C
Pressure 5 bar
(100% CO2) 1 bar
5 bar (85%v CO2)
1 bar
N2 dilution flowrate 1 Nl/min
CO2 flowrate 50 Nml/min
H2O(l) flowrate - - 6 l/min (15%v as steam)
MFIP 2014
-
Capture tests: Adsorption model
MFIP 2014
20
[CO
2(t
)]/[
CO
2] f
inal
-
Capture tests: results
21
MFIP 2014
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
So
rp
tio
n c
ap
ac
ity
[m
mo
lCO
2/g
so
rb
en
t]
Dry conditions
Wet conditions
-
Characterisation after tests
22
MFIP 2014
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
2θ
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
x
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
x
↓
x
Δ
ΔΔ
Δ Δ
Δ Δ
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓↓
↓
↓
ⱡ
ⱡⱡⱡⱡΔ
Δ
Δ
Δ
ⱡ ↓↓ⱡ
Δ: Periclase
ⱡ: Potassium Carbonate↓: Silicon Oxide
x: Aluminum Oxide
XRD patterns after dry tests of: (a) HT1-700, (b) HT1-450, (c) HT1K-700, (d) HT1K-450
-
MFIP 2014
23
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
In
ten
sit
y [
a.u
.]
2θ
(a)
(b)
○
○ ○○○
○
○
○○
◊
○
◊◊◊
○ ○ ○○
#
-
##
#
↓ ↓↓
↓
◊◊
◊
◊
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---
--
- ----
-
-- ----
: Calcium carbonate
#: Calcium Hydroxide
- : Mayenite : Potassium Calcium Carbonate
↓: Silcon Oxide
XRD patterns of tested samples: (a) HT2-700, (b), HT2K-700
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
In
ten
sit
y [
a.u
.]
2θ
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
: Calcium Carbonate
Δ: Periclase
#: Calcium Hydroxide
~: Aluminum Oxide Hydroxide
: Potassium Calcium Carbonate
: Magnesium Calcite
#
#
#
#
↓ Δ
Δ
# #
#
#
#
◊ ◊#
◊ # # #
◊~
◊◊ ◊
◊ #
~
◊ # ~
XRD patterns of tested samples: (a)HT3-700, (b) HT3-450,
(c) HT3K-700, (d) HT3K-450
-
FT-IR analysis • Similar results for HT1-450
and HT1-700: Slight increase of the asymmetrical
vibration mode of the carbonate ν3 at 1494 cm-1 and a decrease at 1403 cm-1
• HT1K-450 and HT1K-700 • Increase of ν3 asymmetrical
carbonate peaks • Increase of a peak at 1043 cm-1 • Possible chemical interaction
among potassium, hydrotalcite and CO2
• HT2-700 • Two sharp peaks arise at 1423 and
837 cm-1 derived from the chemisorption of CO2 on CaO (Busca e Lorenzelli, 1982)
MFIP 2014
24
-
Conclusions
• Sorption capacities increased of 30% at 5bar with respect atmospheric test1
• HT1_700 is the best sorbent in dry conditions (1.6 mmolco2/gsorbent)
• HT1_450 is the best sorbent in wet conditions (1.25 mmolco2/gsorbent)
• Potassium impregnation stabilises trend under cyclic conditions
• Future development: Further studies on potassium impregnation
Long-term cyclic experiments
Higher pressure tests (up to 30 bar, and 400°C) with a new designed reactor.
25
MFIP 2014
1 Gallucci, K., Micheli, F., Parabello, L., Rossi, L. and Foscolo, P.U. GPE – 4th International Congress on Green Process Engineering, 7-10 April 2014, Sevilla (Spain)
-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• Authors are grateful to:
▫ Prof. Giuliana Taglieri and MEng Ilaria Aloisi for XRD analysis
▫ Mrs. Fabiola Ferrante for FT-IR and TG-DTA analysis.
▫ ENEA (Italian National Agency for Energy and Environment) for financial support.
26
MFIP 2014
-
Thank you for your attention!
27
MFIP 2014