co-financed by the european commission intellectual property rights helpdesk dr. michael bohne,...

28
co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk r. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications and Media Law

Upload: bartholomew-mcbride

Post on 11-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk

Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications and Media Law (ITM)

Page 2: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk

First IPR-Helpdesk:Launched in 1998

New IPR-Helpdesk:2002-2004

History

Page 3: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk

RTD performers

RTD results

Results’application

IPRHelpdesk

EuropeanCommission

The IPR-Helpdesk service

Role

Page 4: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Website

Helpline

Activities

Monitoring and

Info-service

IPR-Helpdesk

RepresentativeOffice

Newsletter

(IPR Bulletin)Action Lines

www.ipr-helpdesk.org

Page 5: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Webseitewww.ipr-helpdesk.org

Page 6: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk

Kontakt

IPR Assistance

HELP-LINE(34) 96 590 97 18

[email protected]

Info on the Helpdesk

Representative Office(32) 2 649 53 33

[email protected]

www.ipr-helpdesk.org

Page 7: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

European Research Projects

and

Intellectual Property Law

Title

Page 8: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Introduction

II. Ownership of knowledge

1. Intellectural Property Law

2. Employees‘ Inventions/Creations Law

3. IP-Management

4. Joint ownership

III. Protection of knowledge

IV. Use and dissemination

V. Access rights

1. General principles

2. Exclusion of pre-existing know-how

Table of contents

Page 9: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Participation Rules (Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002) Direct applicable and legally binding for everyone

II. Project Contract (Model Contracts) Agreement between the Commission and the participants on

rights and duties

III. Consortium Agreement (CA) Agreement among the partners

NEW! Duty to agree on a CA, unless otherwise specified in the call

- Shall not affect perticipants’ obligations to the Community and to another arising out of the Regulation or the contract- Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights should definitely be part of the CA - Internal organisation of the consortium- Settlement of internal disputes, pertaining to the Consortium Agreement- etc.

Introduction - Hierarchy of law

Page 10: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Pre-existing know-how

Information which is held by participants prior to the conclusion of the contract (background) or acquired

in parallel with it (sideground) as well as any intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights etc.)

Always remains the property of the participant concerned

II. Knowledge Results and information generated under the

project, including any intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights etc.)

foreground

Introduction- Pre-existing know-how and knowledge

Page 11: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Principle: “sole ownership”The knowledge arising from work carried out under the project is exclusively owned by the partner who executes the work leading to that knowledge.

II. Exception: “joint ownership”

Knowledge from Cooperative and Collective RTD Projects SMEs or enterprise groupings

Knowledge from work jointly carried out by several participants/share of work cannot be ascertained every contributing partner

Ownership of knowledge - Ownership under FP6

Page 12: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. National IP-Rights (e.g. national Patent Acts, Copyright Acts etc) Doctrine of territoriality

The national Intellectual Property Rights are limited to the state, where protection is applied for

Doctrine of treatment as nationals Inventions/Creations of persons who are nationals of other

states are treated the same way as those of nationals

II. International IP-Rights unitary, EU-wide IP-Rights, e.g.:

- Community Trade Mark - Community Design Patent

- Community Plant Varieties Protection - Community Patent (planned)

unitary proceedings of granting, bundle of national IP-rights, e.g.:

- World Patent (PCT) - European Patent (EPC)

Applicable law- Overview IP-Law

Page 13: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

II. IPR-preliminary questions (doctrine of territoriality) no choice of law What kind of national or international IP-Rights have to

be considered? Who is the original owner/inventor etc? Which Employee‘s Creative/Invention Law is

applicable?

I. Contractual rights and duties concerning IPR possibilities of chosing the law Duties concerning acquisition of IP-Rights Duties concerning applying for protection of knowledge Duties concerning access rights Duties concerning use and dissemination

Applicable law - Choice of law

Page 14: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Inventions(technical solutions)

NoveltyInventive StepIndustrially applicable

max. 20 years

National PatentsEuropean Patent Community Patent (planned) PCT-application

National patent offices European patent officeWIPO

Duration of protection

Subject of protection

Legal requirements

Instruments

Competent authorities

Application yes

Ownership of knowledge- Overview IP-Rights I

Patents Copyright Law

Trade Marks

Design Patent

Original Works(Aesthetic Creations)

Distinctive Signs

Expression in particular form OriginalityIndividual character

Distinctive PowerGraphical representative

National Trade MarksEuropean Trade Marks Intern. Registrations

No registration

(in principle) yes (in principle) yes

Lifetime of creator + 70 years

Designs and Models (Aesthetic Creations)

NoveltyOriginalityUseful function

max. 20 years

National Design PatentsEuropean Design PatentIntern. Registration

National OfficesOHIMWIPO

10 years

National Copyrights Laws

no

National OfficesOHIMWIPO

Page 15: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Employees‘ Inventions Law Left to national legislation, great differencies Employer: either original owner or owner by implied cession or right to obtain rights over

invention/patent within a certain period of time from contract or statutory law Employee: Duty to inform, Right to a special compensation Some Member States: special rules for universities (e.g. Italy: „free“ invention, Germany: Right to

refuse, higher compensation)II. Employees‘ Creations Law

Largely left to national legislation (except software protection) Moral rights are generally not transferable economic rights transferable (great differencies)

- Employer: orginial owner (e.g. UK) or automatic transfer of rights (e.g. Germany, UK, NL), software always

- Employee: remain by the creator (e.g. France, Belgium, Portugal, Italy): need for special clauses in employment or separate contract

- Some Member States: special legal situation for universities (e.g. Germany: „free creations“)III. External Inventions/Creations (subcontractors, doctorands, students etc):

Regularly no automatic transfer to the participant Need for a contractual transfer of economic rights

Ownership of knowledge- Employees‘ Inventions/Creations Law

Page 16: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Project Contract/CA are insufficient!!!

Participants are obliged to „take steps or reach appropriate agreements to ensure that these rights can be excercised in a manner compatible with its obligations under this Regulation and the contract“ IP-Management:

Appointment of an „IPR-Manager“

Monitoring and documenting all required rights

What types of exploitations are foreseen? Scope of exploitation?

Which needed IP-Rights are already owned?

Acquisition of all further needed rights as wide as possible - from all employees and external persons/entities- on the ground of the concerned national or international IP-Law- In consideration of the envisaged exploitation

New types of exploitation planned: subsequent acquisition of additionally required IP-Rights?

Ownership of knowledge- IP-Management

Page 17: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Ownership of knowledge- Joint ownership under FP6

I. Joint Ownership

Knowledge from Cooperative and Collective RTD Projects SMEs or enterprise groupings

Knowledge from work jointly carried out by several participants/share of work cannot be ascertained every contributing partner

II. Duty to agree on allocation of ownership terms of exercising ownership in accordance with regulation and contract, particularly AR

III. Applicable Law? No unitary European Law, left to national legislation Difficult to ascertain in cross-border relationships therefore: agreement on detailed rules in CA necessary

Page 18: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

What should be ruled?

Allocation of ownership

Responsibility for the administration of IP-Rights

Determination of the partners who apply for a protection right (e.g. one partner, jointly, by territories, markets, by a joint company etc.)

Responsibility and rights to prosecute IP-Rights-infringements (jointly by all owners, on behalf of other owners etc)

Sharing-model for accruing costs (e.g. compensation costs for inventors, filling costs, maintenance costs, administration costs, prosecution costs, etc.)

Licences for other partners, affiliates, third parties

Rights to licence (jointly by all owners, every owner on its own etc.)

Types of exploitation (commercial, non-commercial etc.)

Rights to exploit (jointly by all owners, every owner on its own etc.)

Legal consequences in case of termination of participation in the contract of an owner or change of control of a owner

Arbitration court agreement, jurisdictional clause

Ownership of knowledge- Consortium Agreement

Page 19: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Principle: Joint protection right application by all joint owners

II. Other possibilities

Protection right application by one partner/several partners which grant licences to the other partners

Foundation of an joint entity (e.g. Ltd., GmbH, EEIG etc.) and transfer of ownership to the joint entity

Ownership of knowledge- Models for allocation of joint ownership

Page 20: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

I. Copyrights as a whole are not transferable (only licences), but patents, utility models, trademarks etc.

II. Ruled by concerned national or international law EP: in writing and signature of parties

III. Requirements under FP6

1. Duty to report the planned assignment and the assignee to the Commission and other contractors

at least 60 days in advance

2. Duty to pass on obligations under the contract to the assignee in particular concerning AR and dissemination and use

3. Right to object within 30 days of notificationCommission:

- Transfer to entities not established in Member State or Associated State

- Conflict with economic interests of the CommunityContractors affecting to their AR

Ownership of knowledge - Transfer of ownership

Page 21: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

On what terms is the protection (filling of a patent etc.) of knowledge mandatory?

I. Capability of industrial or commercial application

II. Adequate and effective protection in regard to the legitimate interests of the contractors concerned

In principal duty to apply for protection rights

Consideration of costs/benefits and prospects/risks– Necessity of protection (e.g. copyright protection sufficient?)– Kind of protection (e.g. patent or utility model?)– Period and extent of protection (nat. patents, EP, how many states etc?)

Limits– Excessive financial demands for the concerned partners– Damage of financial and other interests of another partner

Protection of knowledge - Duty to protect

Page 22: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Protection of knowledge - If a contractor fails to do so

I. Possibility to agree on a right of entry in favor of other contractors in CA Duty to inform the consortium about non-applying Duty to report to the consortium about interested partners Regulations for the case that several partners are interested in a

protection right application Transfer of the right to apply in compliance with the conditions

established for the transfer of ownership (see above)

II. Right to entry of the Commission (Participation Rules/Contract) Contractor does not intend to protect its knowledge in a specific country

or a contractor waives the protection Duty to inform the Commission (45 days prior to the corresponding

deadline) Commission adopts measures to protect knowledge with the agreement

of the contractor Right to refuse only where legitimate interests of the contractor will

significantly impaired Community takes on the obligations regarding AR

Page 23: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Use and dissemination - Duty to use

I. Duty to use knowledge

For research purposes or For commercial exploitation purposes

II. Obligated Contractor Owner/joint owners of knowledge concerned

III. How?

Use by the owner/owners concerned

Pass on the usage to another contractor or third party• by transfer of ownership (see above) • by exclusive or non-exclusive licences (see below)

IV. Plan for using and disseminating

“Terms of use in a detailed and verifiable manner”

Page 24: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Use and dissemination- Models of usage/exploitation

I. Principle: Every partner uses/exploits only its own knowledge Possibly other partners having access rights to use their knowledge Access rights to knowledge and peKH of other partners, if needed

for using own knowledge

II. Other Possibilities Cross licencing

Mutual licencing by all partners and every partner exploits its own and foreign knowledge

One or several partnerstransfer of knowledge or licence to one or several partners which exploit all knowledge

Foundation of a joint exploitation company - national law (e.g. PLC, Ltd., GmbH.) or

- unitary European law (EEIG, Oct. 2004: Societas Europeae) Third Parties

Transfer of knowledge ownership or licence to third parties which exploit

Page 25: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Use and dissemination - Duty to disseminate

I. DisseminationPublication of knowledge by every appropriate means other than publication resulting from the formalities for protecting knowledge (e.g. patent register)

Within a period of two years after end of project Contractor fail to do: Commission allowed to disseminate

II. Obligated Contractor owner/joint owner of knowledge

III. Conditions for publications

Permitted, if it does not affect an IP-Right application- Principle of “absolute” novelty First apply, then publish!!!- No grace period in European Patent Law (unlike U.S.)

Procedure- Written notice of any planned publication to the Commission and partners (30 days prior)- If so requested: copy of data to Commission and/or partners (30

days after notice) - Right to object by Commission and partners, if publication affect

IP-Right application (within 30 days after receipt of data)- Publication interdicted until the end of consultation period

Page 26: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Access rights - General principles

I. Access Rights (AR) licences and rights to use

II. General principles Unitary rules for all partners and instruments (IP,

NoE, STREP etc.) Only within same project Only where contractor is free to grant them Only upon written request No sub-licencing (even for affiliates), if not so

agreed Only if needed for the concerned purpose

(execution or use) No possibility to restrict AR, but to grant additional

AR to partners or third parties Duty to inform about any limitations of potential AR Confidentiality and purpose clauses (not

mandatory, but reasonable)

Page 27: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

For the purpose of executing own work

For the purpose of using own knowledge

Royalty-freeunless otherwise agreed before signing the contract

Fair and non-discriminatory conditions

Access rights - Overview

Pre-existing Know-howunless excluded before signing the contract

Knowledge Royalty-freeunless otherwise agreed before signing the contract

Royalty-free

Time for request subject to legitimate interests

Until end of project Until 2 years after end of project

Page 28: co-financed by the European Commission Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk Dr. Michael Bohne, University of Muenster, Institute for Information, Telecommunications

Intellectual Property Rights Helpdesk

Contact

IPR Assistance

HELP-LINE

[email protected]

Info on the Helpdesk

Representative Office(32) 2 649 53 33

[email protected]

www.ipr-helpdesk.org