co e - smcgov.org...by 1970 oak (510 in as april broadway, land, ca 946) 763‐2061 sociation wit 9,...

By

1970Oak(510

In as

April

0 Broadway,kland, CA 9460) 763‐2061

ssociation wit

l 9, 2015

E

, Suite 740 612

th Dyett & Bh

CO

EvaluaA

atia, Nelson N

ONNEC

ation AlternBui

Nygaard, and

CT THE

of Tranativeldout

Dr

S

d Flint Strateg

E COA

anspoes to ADefic

raft R

PreSan Mat

gies

ASTSID

ortatioAddreciencie

eport

epared fteo Coun

DE

on sses

t 2

fornty

EvaluationAddress B

CONNECT

INTRODU

SUMMAR

MIDCOHALF M

IDENTIFIC

ALTERNRoadBicycTransParki



EVALUAT




CONCLUS

Hybri

n of TransporBuildout Defic

T THE COASTS

UCTION .........

RY OF DEFICIE

AST ..............MOON BAY AN

CATION OF AL

NATIVE 1 – LOway and Intecle and Pedestsit Improvemng ImprovemNATIVE 2 – Mway and Intecle and Pedestsit Improvemng ImprovemNATIVE 3 – HIway and Intecle and Pedestsit Improvemng Improvem

ION OF ALTE

NATIVE 1 – LOway and Intecle and Pedestsit Improvemng ImprovemNATIVE 2 – Mway and Intecle and Pedestsit Improvemng ImprovemNATIVE 3 – HIway and Intecle and Pedestsit Improvemng Improvem

SION .............

id Alternative

rtation Alternciencies

SIDE .............

....................

ENCIES IDENT

.....................ND SR 92 EAST

LTERNATIVES

OW COST/LOWersection Imptrian Facility ents .............

ments.............EDIUM COST/ersection Imptrian Facility ents .............

ments.............GH COST/HIGersection Imptrian Facility ents .............

ments.............

RNATIVES ....

OW COST/LOWersection Imptrian Facility ents .............

ments.............EDIUM COST/ersection Imptrian Facility ents .............

ments.............GH COST/HIGersection Imptrian Facility ents .............

ments.............

....................

e with Sugges

natives to

Table....................

....................

TIFIED FOR BU

.....................T OF HALF MO

S ...................

W IMPACT IMrovements ...Improvemen........................................../MEDIUM IMrovements ...Improvemen..........................................GH IMPACT IMrovements ...Improvemen..........................................

....................

W IMPACT IMrovements ...Improvemen........................................../MEDIUM IMrovements ...Improvemen..........................................GH IMPACT IMrovements ...Improvemen..........................................

....................

sted Improvem

i

Ex

of Conten....................

....................

UILDOUT CON

......................OON BAY ......

....................

MPROVEMENT......................ts ..............................................................

MPACT IMPRO......................ts ..............................................................MPROVEMEN......................ts ..............................................................

....................

MPROVEMENT......................ts ..............................................................

MPACT IMPRO......................ts ..............................................................MPROVEMEN......................ts ..............................................................

....................

ments ...........

xperts Connectin

nts ....................

....................

NDITIONS ....

.....................

.....................

....................

TS .....................................................................................................OVEMENTS ........................................................................................TS ....................................................................................................

....................

TS .....................................................................................................OVEMENTS ........................................................................................TS ....................................................................................................

....................

.....................

ng Communities

....................

....................

....................

.....................

.....................

....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

....................

.....................

April 9,

....................

....................

....................

......................

......................

....................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

....................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

....................

......................

, 2015

....... I

...... 3

...... 4

....... 4

....... 5

...... 6

....... 6

....... 6

....... 7

....... 8

....... 8

..... 10

..... 10

..... 11

..... 12

..... 12

..... 13

..... 13

..... 14

..... 15

..... 15

.... 16

..... 17

..... 17

..... 21

..... 22

..... 23

..... 24

..... 25

..... 28

..... 30

..... 31

..... 33

..... 33

..... 39

..... 41

..... 42

.... 44

..... 44

EvaluationAddress B

FIGURE 1 ‐

TABLE 1 ‐ PTABLE 2 ‐ ATABLE 3 ‐ CTABLE 4 ‐ ATABLE 5 ‐ CTABLE 6 ‐ ATABLE 7 ‐ CTABLE 8 ‐ ATABLE 9 ‐ CTABLE 10 ‐TABLE 11 ‐TABLE 12 ‐TABLE 13 ‐TABLE 14 ‐TABLE 15 ‐TABLE 16 ‐TABLE 17 ‐TABLE 18 ‐TABLE 19 ‐TABLE 20 ‐TABLE 21 ‐TABLE 22 ‐TABLE 23 ‐TABLE 24 ‐TABLE 25 ‐TABLE 26 ‐TABLE 27 ‐TABLE 28 ‐ APPENDICAPPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX P:\P\14\1407Alternatives D

n of TransporBuildout Defic

‐ EXISTING AND

PEDESTRIAN, BALTERNATIVE 1COST ESTIMATALTERNATIVE 1COST ESTIMATALTERNATIVE 1COST ESTIMATALTERNATIVE 1COST ESTIMAT‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ COST ESTIMA‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ COST ESTIMA‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ COST ESTIMA‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ COST ESTIMA‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ COST ESTIMA‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ ALTERNATIVE‐ COST ESTIMA‐ COST OF HYB‐ COST OF HYB‐ COST OF HYB‐ COST OF HYB

ES A ‐ COST ESTIMB ‐ FEASIBILITYC ‐ EVALUATIOD ‐ PROPOSED

75‐000 San MateoDraft Report v12.d

rtation Alternciencies

D FUTURE COA

BICYCLE, TRANS1 BUILDOUT COTES FOR ALTERN1 BICYCLE ANDTES FOR ALTERN1 TRANSIT EVATES FOR ALTERN1 PARKING EVATES FOR ALTERNE 2 BUILDOUT CATES FOR ALTERE 2 BICYCLE ANATES FOR ALTERE 2 TRANSIT EVE 2 PARKING EVATES FOR ALTERE 3 BUILDOUT CE 3 BUILDOUT CATES FOR ALTERE 3 BICYCLE ANATES FOR ALTERE 3 TRANSIT EVE 3 PARKING EVATES FOR ALTERRID ALTERNATRID ALTERNATRID ALTERNATRID ALTERNAT

MATE CALCULAY AND DESIGNON METRIC SCOD ROUNDABOU

Midcoast CTMP\0docx

natives to

List ASTAL TRAIL AN

ListSIT, AND PARKONDITIONS PENATIVE 1 ROAD PEDESTRIAN NATIVE 1 BICYCALUATION SCONATIVE 1 TRANALUATION SCONATIVE 1 PARKCONDITIONS PRNATIVE 2 ROAD PEDESTRIANRNATIVE 2 BICYVALUATION SCOVALUATION SCRNATIVE 2 PARCONDITIONS PCONDITIONS PRNATIVE 3 ROAD PEDESTRIANRNATIVE 3 BICYVALUATION SCOVALUATION SCRNATIVE 3 PARTIVE ROADWAYTIVE BICYCLE ATIVE TRANSIT IMTIVE PARKING I

ATIONS CONSIDERATIORES UT PAVING FOO

07 Deliverables\07

ii

Ex

of FiguresND PARALLEL T

t of TablesKING EVALUATIAK HOUR INTEDWAY AND INTEVALUATION SCLE AND PEDERES ................NSIT IMPROVEORES ...............KING IMPROVEPEAK HOUR INTADWAY AND INN EVALUATIONYCLE AND PEDORES ..............CORES .............RKING IMPROVPEAK HOUR ROPEAK HOUR INTADWAY AND INN EVALUATIONYCLE AND PEDORES ..............CORES .............RKING IMPROVY AND INTERSEND PEDESTRIAMPROVEMENTMPROVEMENT

ONS

OTPRINT

7 Alternatives Eval

xperts Connectin

s TRAIL FACILITIE

s ION METRICS .ERSECTION LEVTERSECTION IMSCORES ...........ESTRIAN IMPRO.......................MENTS ..................................EMENTS ..........TERSECTION LENTERSECTION N SCORES .........DESTRIAN IMPR..............................................VEMENTS ........OADWAY SEGMTERSECTION LENTERSECTION N SCORES .........DESTRIAN IMPR..............................................VEMENTS ........ECTION IMPROAN IMPROVEMTS ....................TS ...................

luation Report\Re

ng Communities

ES ....................

........................VEL OF SERVICMPROVEMENT........................OVEMENTS .....................................................................................................EVEL OF SERVICIMPROVEMEN........................ROVEMENTS ...........................................................................MENT LEVEL OFEVEL OF SERVICIMPROVEMEN........................ROVEMENTS ...........................................................................OVEMENTS ......ENTS ..............................................................

vised Final Report

April 9,

.......................

.......................E.....................TS..............................................................................................................................................................CE...................NTS ....................................................................................................................................F SERVICE ........CE...................NTS ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

t\Evaluation of

, 2015

........ 9

...... 17

...... 18

...... 20

...... 21

...... 22

...... 22

...... 23

...... 23

...... 24

...... 25

...... 27

...... 28

...... 30

...... 31

...... 32

...... 32

...... 34

...... 35

...... 38

...... 40

...... 40

...... 41

...... 43

...... 43

...... 47

...... 49

...... 50

...... 51

INTRODUCTION In 2012, the California Coastal Commission certified a package of amendments known as the Midcoast Update to San Mateo County’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). Policy 2.53 of the Updated LCP requires San Mateo County to prepare a Comprehensive Transportation Management Plan (CTMP). Connect the Coastside is the project that will produce the CTMP. The CTMP requirement of the Local Coastal Program responds to the impact that growth in the region has had on roadway capacity, which is viewed by many as insufficient to support the current and future needs of the community and visitors.

This report presents several alternatives that were developed to address some or all of the deficiencies identified in the Buildout Analysis and Traffic Projections Report and evaluate the improvements identified in each alternative based on how well they address the identified deficiencies, as well as their feasibility and cost‐effectiveness. In the initial stages of Connect the Coastside, over 110 specific ideas to mitigate the potential impacts of future growth in the Midcoast and Half Moon Bay study area were generated by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Midcoast and Half Moon Bay community, and prior studies for improving multi‐modal transportation (e.g. vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit).

A series of three alternatives have been identified based on the expected cost associated with the projects and the potential environmental and political impact of the potential projects. This memorandum presents a Low Cost/Low Potential Impact alternative, a Medium Cost/Medium Potential Impact alternative and a High Cost/High Potential Impact alternative. Each of the three alternatives is designed to be multi‐modal with potential projects to address needs for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users and automobile users.

The end result of this study will be a Comprehensive Transportation Management Plan with a preferred alternative to be adopted and implemented by the Board of Supervisors for the Midcoast communities of San Mateo County. The CTMP will also serve as an advisory plan for the City of Half Moon Bay.

EvaluAddre

The BtranspidenticompcurreThe dTraffi

MIUndecommvehiclfrom the LCwill ntraffic

The lacircuitHighwspeeduncon

Translack a

TherespeciaMontwere parkin

1 CounDepar2 Half

ation of Traness Buildout D

Buildout Anaportation issuified for the paring existingnt Local Coasdeficiencies idc Projections

DCOASr Buildout comunities will rles trying to eresidential neCP. Additionaot meet the c the roadway

ayout of neigtous routes bway 1 is limitds, and unimntrolled locat

it service opemenities and

e is generally al events deara State Beaobserved to ng locations a

nty of San Matrtment. f Moon Bay Cir

sportation AlDeficiencies

S

alysis and Traues and deficMidcoast, Hag conditions stal Program1 dentified for Report and s

ST onditions, theresult in the enter Highwaeighborhoodsally, under Buroadway segy is designed

hborhoods inbetween nearted by infreqmproved pedions to help p

erates at lowd shelter for u

sufficient pamand for paach lots northbe at or abovare not alway

teo Local Coas

rculation Elem

ternatives to

SUMMIDENT

affic Projecticiencies on thalf Moon Bayto the policie(LCP) and theeach area aummarized s

e projected inmajority of uy 1. The majos, will operatuildout condgment LOS stato handle.

n many of therby destinatioquent crossindestrian facilipedestrians a

w frequencies users waiting

arking supply arking can exh of Montarave capacity dys easily ident

stal Program Po

ment, 2013, City

4

MARY TIFIED

ions Reporthe Midcoast y and State es and level e Half Moon are documeneparately bel

ncrease in traunsignalized iority of unsige worse thanitions, the enandard as de

e Midcoast coons. Additionang opportuniities. There nd cyclists sa

and limited for buses.

during the wxceed the ava and the Fitzuring some ptified or signe

olicies, 2013, C

y of Half Moon

Experts Conn

OF DED FOR

COprovided a and in Half MRoute (SR) 9of service (LOBay General nted in the Tlow.

affic along Higintersections gnalized intersn the intersecntirety of Higefined in the

ommunities inally, beach acities, heavy tare no stopafely cross Hig

coverage. Ad

weekdays; hovailable capazgerald Marinpeak periods. ed.

County of San

n Bay.

necting Commun

EFICIER BUILONDITdetailed anaMoon Bay. D92 east of HaOS) standardPlan and CircTask 2 Buildo

ghway 1 withto experiencsections withction LOS stanghway 1 withLCP, based o

nhibits mobilccess for pedtraffic volump controls orghway 1.

dditionally, ex

owever duringcity. The Mane Reserve lo It was also n

Mateo, Plannin

Ap

nities

ENCIESLDOUTTIONSalysis of existDeficiencies walf Moon Bayds defined in culation Updaout Analysis

hin the Midcoce high delayhin the Midcondard definehin the Midcoon the volume

ity and resultestrians cross

mes, high vehr treatments

xisting bus st

g weekends artini Creek ot in Moss Benoted that pu

ng and Buildin

ril 9, 2015

S T S ting were y by the

ate2. and

oast y for oast, d in oast e of

ts in sing hicle s at

tops

and and each ublic

ng

EvaluAddre

HAMOBasedof thedelay Circullanes betwebetwestandAll stumeet

A lackaccespedesopporTheresafely

Translack a

The mduring


ALF MOOON BAd on the incree unsignalizedand to operation Elemenwhich will oeen Mirada Reen Redondoard as defineudy intersectthe LOS stan

k of consistensibility withinstrian accessrtunities, heae are no stop y cross the hig

it service opemenities and

majority of bg peak period


OON BAAY ease in trafficd intersectionrate worse thnt. Highway 1perate withinRoad and Grao Beach Roaed in the LCP,ions along SRdards under

nt pedestriann and betwe along the Havy traffic vocontrols or trghways.

erates at lowd shelter for u

beach access ds.

ternatives to

AY AND

along Highwns within the han the inte1 within the n the roadwandview Boulead and Fairw, based on thR 92 and the projected Bu

n and bicycle een communHighway 1 aolumes, high reatments at

w frequencies users waiting

parking lots

5

D SR 92

way 1 under pCity of Half Mrsection LOS City of Half ay segment Levard, betweway Drive, we volume of ttwo‐lane porildout conditi

trails and crities within tnd SR 92 covehicle speeuncontrolled

and limited for buses.

were observ

Experts Conn

2 EAST

rojected BuilMoon Bay arestandard deMoon Bay haLOS standard.een Kelly Avenill not meet traffic the rortion of SR 92ions.

rossings resulthe City of Horridor is limds, and unimd locations to

coverage. Ad

ved to opera

necting Commun

OF HA

dout conditioe expected toefined in theas several se. However, twnue and Seym the roadwaadway is des2 east of Mai

lts in decreasHalf Moon Bmited by infrmproved pede help pedestr

dditionally, ex

ate at over 1

Ap

nities

ALF

ons, the majo experience h Half Moon ections with fwo‐lane sectimour Street, ay segment signed to hanin Street will

sed mobility ay. Additionarequent crossestrian facilitrians and cyc

xisting bus st

100% capacit

ril 9, 2015

ority high Bay four ions and LOS dle. not

and ally, sing ties. lists

tops

ty

EvaluAddre

ImprocomprecendeficiimplecompfeasibRepor

Improcost, well aThe th

x

x

x

Alterncateg

x x x x

ALTIMAlternand wbe imthe exare bo

Roax

x

x


IDovements incpiled from TAt, relevant reencies. To adementation oplete list of pble and addrrt.

ovements areexpected imas the overalhree alternat

Alternative

Alternative

Alternative

natives are ories:

Roadway aBicycle andTransit andParking

TERNAPROVEnative 1 mainwithout signifmproved with xpansion of tolded.

adway aAddition o

Signage toMidcoast a

Stop signs


DENTIFcluded in eacAC and commeports, as welddress the neover the nextotential imprressed deficie

e grouped intpact to existl effect on reives describe

e 1 – Low Cos

e 2 – Medium

e 3 – High Co

defined by

and intersectid Pedestrian d

ATIVE 1EMENTnly focuses onicant cost or signage and he multi‐mod

nd Interof left‐turn ba

o restrict turnand Half Moo

added to uns

ternatives to

FICATIch alternativemunity‐suggel as improvemeeds for the t 30 years torovements wencies identi

to three alteting infrastrucesidents of thd in this secti

st/Low Impac

m Cost/Mediu

st/High Impa

proposed i

ions/access pfacilities

1 – LOWTS n improvemeenvironmentstriping chandal “Parallel T

rsection ay and accele

ing movemenon Bay

signed interse

6

ION Oe are selecteested improvments suggesBuildout pro

o respond towas analyzed fied in the B

ernatives for cture, envirohe Midcoast ion are as foll

ct

um Impact

ct

mprovement

points

W COST

ents that can tal impact. Thnges as well aTrail”. Project

Improveration lane a

nts to consoli

ections along

Experts Conn

OF ALTed from a listvements, prosted by the Dojections, theo planned groto determineBuildout Ana

evaluation. onment and sCommunitieslows:

ts and mod

T/LOW

be made withese projects as improvemets currently b

vementsat Gray Whal

date traffic a

g Highway 1

necting Commun

TERNAt of potentiaoposed projeKS team to ade projects areowth in the e which impralysis and Tr

Each alternatsurrounding cs and City of

difications to

W IMPA

thin the existaddress deficents already being planne

e Cove parkin

t key intersec

Ap

nities

ATIVESal improvemects identifiedddress identife considered study area. rovements wraffic Projecti

tive is basedcommunitiesHalf Moon B

o the follow

ACT

ting right of wciencies that planned suchd and evalua

ng lot

ctions within

ril 9, 2015

S ents d in fied for The

were ions

d on s, as Bay.

wing

way can h as ated

EvaluAddre

x

Bicyx

x

x

x


Defined cua consisten

o Ha

o El

o M

o M

ycle andStriped crolocations a

o Gro Mo 2n

o 7th

o Mo Vio Cao Cyo HMo Noo Suo Mo Mo Keo Teo Quo Pilo SR

Sidewalks pedestrian

o AloHa

o Alo

Sharrows oHalf Moon

Traffic signo Peo Cr


urb and pavednt cross sectio

alf Moon Bay

Granada Seg

oss Beach Seg

ontara Segme

d Pedestossing with beas seen in Figuray Whale Coontara State d Street h Street oss Beach Ligrginia Street alifornia Streeypress AvenuMB Airport orth Capistranurfer’s Beach edio Avenue irada Road ehoe Avenue errace Avenueuarry Road (alarcitos CreekR 35 (along SR

in the followns: ong Highway alf Moon Bay ong Coronado

on Main Streen Bay

nal updates thedestrian couosswalk signa

ternatives to

d shoulder foon for vehicle

Segment ‐ Te

ment ‐ Capist

gment ‐ Califo

ent ‐ 7th Stre

rian Faceacons to aleure 1: ove Beach

ghthouse (16t

et e

no Road Parking area,

e/Grand Boullong SR 92) k Road (alongR 92)

ing locations

1 in Montara

o Street and A

et in Montara

hroughout Hant‐down indial crossing ad

7

r the followine and pedestr

errace Avenu

trano Road to

ornia Avenue

eet and 9th St

cility Imprt traffic at th

th Street)

, north of Cor

evard

g SR 92)

to provide a

a, Moss Beach

Avenue Alham

a, Carlos Stree

alf Moon Bay cators on all sdjustments to

Experts Conn

ng segments arian safety:

e to Seymour

o Coronado S

e to Cypress A

treet

provemehe following h

ronado Street

more continu

h, Miramar, a

mbra in El Gr

et in Moss Be

including: signalized croo accommoda

necting Commun

along Highwa

r Street

treet

Avenue

ents high demand

t

uous walking

and develope

anada

each, and Ma

osswalks ate slower wa

Ap

nities

ay 1 to provid

and bus stop

path for

ed areas of

in Street in

alking speeds

ril 9, 2015

de

p

EvaluAddre

Trax

x

Parx

x

x

3 To b


o Bico Pe

nsit ImpImprovempassenger stops consstudy area

o 11Su

o 12Str

o 13Al

o 33SR

o 8 b

More freqarea:

o Inco Inc

rking ImpFormalizedHighway 1

Paving and

Improved

e evaluated by


cycle signal dedestrian refu

provemeents to bus stseating, pedesist only of a sa:

1 bus stops in unshine Valley

2 bus stops in reet. Airport

3 bus stops in hambra/Plaza

3 bus stops in R‐92 serving S

bus stops eas

uent weeken

crease weekecrease weeke

provemed parallel par1.

d striping at t

wayfinding si

y the Green Val

ternatives to

etection deviuge spaces on

ents tops includinestrian lightinsign to denot

Montara aloy Road servin

Moss Beach Street, and P

El Granada aa Alhambra, a

Half Moon BSamtrans Rou

st of Half Moo

d service for

end frequencyend frequency

ents king for Mont

the upper Gra

ignage

lley Trail and C

8

ice n wide road cr

g overhead sng, and electre the location

ng Highway 1g Samtrans R

along Highwarospect Way

along Airport and Highway

Bay along highte 17 and Ro

on Bay along

the existing S

y on Route 17y on Route 29

tara State Be

ay Whale Cov

Congestion Ma

Experts Conn

rossings

helters, bike ronic bus arrin. The followi

1, Main StreeRoute 17

ay 1, Sunshinserving Samt

Street, Capist1 serving Sam

hway 1, Mainute 294

SR‐92 serving

SamTrans fixe

7 from 120 m94 from 120 m

each, with a p

ve parking lo

anagement Pro

necting Commun

racks, trash rval signs. Curing bus stops

t, 6th/Harte S

ne Valley Roadtrans Route 1

trano Road, Amtrans Route

Street. Kelly

g Samtrans Ro

ed routes serv

minutes to 60 minutes to 60

hysical separ

ot3

ojects

Ap

nities

receptacles, rrently bus s serve the

Street, and

d, Etheldore 17

Ave e 17

Street, and

oute 294

ving the stud

minutes 0 minutes.

ration from

ril 9, 2015

y

EvaluAddre

Figure


e 1 ‐ Existing an


nd Future Coas

ternatives to

stal Trail and P

9

Parallel Trail Fa

Experts Conn

acilities

necting Commun

Ap

nities

ril 9, 2015

EvaluAddre

ALTIMAlternthis sstandaccesturns improenviroand Cdemaadditihigh r

Roax

x

x

x

x

x


TERNAPACT Inative 2 inclusection. Alterard under Bus to Highwayoff of and

ovements reonmental impCapistrano Roand‐focused ional parkingrecreational d

adway aAll Alterna

Signalizatio

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o HianBa

o HiincCit

Restrictingmeasures:

o Ad

o ReVe

Addition oStreet)

Addition o

Consolidat


ATIVE 2IMPROudes all straternative 2 aduildout by redy 1. This is doon to High

equire a mopact. Alternatoad, which aimprovementg in high demdemand.

nd Interative 1 roadw

on of the follo

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 andnalysis as an inay)

ghway 1 andcluded in Builty of Half Mo

g access to Hig

ddition of a m

estricting acceermont Avenu

of a median w

of left‐turn ba

tion of access

ternatives to

2 – MEDOVEMEegies introdudresses interducing the nune through thway 1 or boderate amotive 2 also core currently ts to transitmand location

rsection ay improvem

owing interse

California Av

Cypress Aven

Kehoe Avenu

Main Street ntersection p

Grand Bouleldout analysison Bay)

ghway 1 from

median betwe

ess to Highwaue east of Hig

with northbou

ay and accele

s to Highway

10

DIUM CNTS ced in Alternrsection LOSumber of locahe addition oy blocking aount of caponsiders suppbeing evaluat service (e.gns for observ

Improvments

ections meeti

venue in Moss

nue in Moss B

ue in Half Mo

(S) in Half Mplanned to be

evard/Terraces as an interse

m residential n

een 7th Street

ay 1 betweenghway 1 in Mo

und left‐turn

eration lane a

1 at the follow

Experts Conn

COST/M

native 1, in ad at intersectations where of raised medaccess to Higpital investmplementary biated as part og. shuttles aved overflow

vements

ing signal war

s Beach

Beach

oon Bay

Moon Bay (Alr signalized by

e Avenue in Hection planne

neighborhoo

t and 9th Stre

St. Etheldoreoss Beach

bay at the Li

at 8th Street in

wing location

necting Commun

MEDIU

ddition to thtions that do traffic can hians physicalghway 1 coment with ike lanes alonof Plan Princand park‐andw during wee

rrants:

eady includey the City of H

Half Moon Baed to be signa

ds through th

eet in Montar

e/Vallemar St

ighthouse in

n Montara

ns:

Ap

nities

UM

ose describedo not meet ave unrestricly restricting mpletely. Thsome potenng Airport Strceton, as weld‐ride lots) ekend periods

d in Buildout Half Moon

ay (Already alized by the

he following

ra

treet and

Montara (16

ril 9, 2015

d in the cted left

hese ntial reet ll as and s of

6th

EvaluAddre

x

Bicyx

x

x


o Nu

o ReCr

o Grpla

An expansinclude the

o HaAv

o El Co

o M

o M

ycle andAll Alterna

“Parallel Tthe entire communitcomposedproposed Plan (CBPPproposed

o PrbeFrabebo

o PrbealoanM

Class II bikPrinceton


urseryman’s E

ealign Frenchmeek Road and

rand Avenue anned improv

ion of the dee following se

alf Moon Bayvenue to Fren

Granada Segoral Reef Aven

oss Beach Seg

ontara Segme

d Pedestative 1 bicycle

rail” adjacentstudy area, wies and locale of Class I, ClaNorth Coast BP), connectinglocation of th

oposed Paraletween 2nd Stancais Avenuetween the exorder of Half M

oposed Coastetween the Deong Cypress And the paving oon Bay.

ke lane along

ternatives to

Exchange driv

man’s Creek d Venice Boul

and Terrace vement by th

fined curb anegments alon

y Segment –nchman's Cree

gment ‐ Coronue

gment ‐ Cypr

ent ‐ between

rian Face and pedestr

t to Highway will provide pees along Highass II and ClasBikeway in thg Daly City, Pahe Parallel Tra

lel trail alignmreet in Montae in Half Mooxisting bicycleMoon Bay.

tal trail alignmevil’s Slide TrAvenue betweof an existing

Capistrano R

11

veways betwe

Road to conslevard

Avenue (Alrehe City of Half

nd paved shoung Highway 1:

– Seymour Stek Road

onado Street

ess Avenue to

n 1st Street a

cility Imprian facility im

1 and Coastaedestrians anway 1. As envss III bike facie County’s Coacifica, and Hail and Coasta

ment would bara and the eon Bay and a e facilities at W

ment would bail and 2nd Steen Highway g 1.69 mile di

Road which is

Experts Conn

een Mirada R

solidate inter

eady includedf Moon Bay)

ulder include:

treet to Redo

to Medio Av

o Etheldore S

and 7th Street

provememprovements

al Trail adjacend cyclists witvisioned, thisilities. These fomprehensivHalf Moon Bayal Trail.

be a 6.23 mileexisting bicycl1.58 mile segWavecrest Ro

be a 1.82 milereet in Monta1 and Airporirt path along

s currently be

necting Commun

Road and You

rsections at Fr

d in Buildout a

d in Alternati

ondo Beach

venue & Cap

Street

t

ents

nt to the coath a direct cos facility woulfacilities will ve Bicycle andy. Figure 17 s

e segment aloe facilities at gment along Hoad and the s

e segment aloara, a 0.25 mrt Street in Mg the coast in

eing evaluate

Ap

nities

ng Avenue

renchman’s

analysis as a

ive 1 to

Road & Terr

pistrano Road

stline along nnection to d be be part of thed Pedestrian hows the

ong Highway Ruisseau Highway 1 southern

ong Highwayile segment oss Beach, south Half

ed for Plan

ril 9, 2015

race

d to

e

1

1

EvaluAddre

x

Trax

x

x

x

Parx

x


Class II bikPrinceton

nsit ImpAll Alterna

Shuttle buspecial eve

o Ju

o Spwe

o Op

o Prthon

o Fre

The establlots as weepotential ra location

o Pilo Cho Ca

School busthe Techniprovide adbe needed

rking ImpAll Alterna

Additionalfollowing l

o Paav


ke lane along

provemeative 1 transit

s service on sents with the

ne – October

pecial event weekends of se

perational ho

ovides conneree locationsn the event).

equency of 3

lishment of aekend park‐ariders who dofor people tollar Point Harhurch of Jesusalvary Chapel

s service for Cical Advisory dequate servid.

provemeative 1 parking

parking facilocations:

arking lot for vailable for ov

ternatives to

Airport Stree

ents improvemen

summer and ffollowing cha

r program

weekend servervice, or 8 da

urs from sun

ections from e in the study

0 minutes

a park‐and‐ridand‐ride locato not live witho meet and cabor, Princetos Christ of Lator Our Lady o

Cabrillo UnifieCommittee, tce. Also, a fac

ents g improveme

ities or parkin

Rancho Corraverflow beach

12

et which is cu

nts

fall weekendsaracteristics:

ice, outside oays total a yea

rise to sunset

either Hillsdaarea (the exa

de shuttle antions to improhin walking darpool: on tter Day Saintof the Pillar c

ed School Distthe school discility for stori

ents

ng improvem

al de Tierra ach parking

Experts Conn

urrently bein

s during peak

of peak summar

t

le or Haywardact communit

nd usage of tove access todistance of bu

ts, Moss Beacchurches in Ha

trict. Based ostrict would ning the vehicl

ents for recre

ccess east of

necting Commun

g evaluated f

k recreational

mer period; up

d Park Caltraties would be

he following o transit partius service and

ch alf Moon Bay

on feedback rneed a total oes and maint

eational user

highway, wh

Ap

nities

for Plan

l times and

p to 4

in Station to e dependent

existing parkcularly for thd to also prov

y

eceived fromof 10 buses totenance woul

s at the

ich could also

ril 9, 2015

king hose vide

m o d

o be

EvaluAddre

ALTIMAlternensuiimproAlterncapacalternHighwerosioroundwhento proccasAlternfor pelanes Translarge a sign

Roax

x


TERNAPROVEnative 3 encong section. Aove roadwaynative 3 buildcity through nate route wiway 1 would on concerns,dabouts are p considering ovide additioional passingnative 3 also edestrian trafalong SR 92 it service woamount of canificant impac

adway aAll Alternareplacing p

Roundabo

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o Hi

o M

o Hi


ATIVE 3EMENTompasses AltAs roadway se segment LOds on the impthe proposethin Half Moundergo a c, which wouproposed for signalization onal travel lag/climbing laintroduces pffic across Higto allow for

ould be improapital investmct to Midcoas

nd Interative 1 and Altproposed sign

uts at the fol

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

ain Street and

ghway 1 and

ternatives to

3 – HIGTS ternatives 1 egment LOS OS is to incrovements prd addition oon Bay throuomplete realuld also inclintersectionsof an interseanes along Sanes to redupedestrian ovghway 1 withsafe bicycle oved with pement, potentiat communitie

rsection ternative 2 ronalization of i

lowing inters

9th Street in M

Etheldore Str

Cypress Aven

Capistrano R

Coronado St

Mirada Road

Kehoe Avenu

Main Street

SR 92 in Half

d SR 92 in Ha

Higgins Cany

13

H COST

and 2, as wis defined byrease capacirovided in Altof travel laneugh the additlignment in Elude a larges acting as comction. While tSR 92, capacce bottlenecver/under croout interferincommuting

ermanent locally require aes and Half M

Improvoadway improntersections

ections:

Montara

reet (N) in Mo

nue in Moss B

Road (S) in El G

reet in El Gra

d in Miramar

ue in Half Mo

(N) in Half Mo

f Moon Bay

lf Moon Bay

yon Road/Ma

Experts Conn

T/HIGH

well as thosey capacity utiity or divert ternative 1 anes in the Midtion of a fronEl Granada, te addition ommunity gatethe existing tity can be imcks caused bossings at higng with traffibetween Sanal routes. Thcquisition of

Moon Bay.

vementsovements witwith roundab

oss Beach

Beach

Granada

nada

oon Bay

oon Bay

in Street (S) i

necting Commun

H IMPA

e strategies dlization, the traffic to and Alternativedcoast and btage road eato address seof parking ceways or as rterrain wouldmproved by by truck traffgh demand loc flow, as wen Mateo and hese improveright of way

th the exceptbouts

n Half Moon

Ap

nities

ACT

described in primary waysa parallel roue 2 by increasby proposingst of Highwaea level rise apacity. Sevrequired anald make it diffithe additionfic along SR ocations to alell as Class II BHalf Moon Bments requirand will resu

tion of

Bay

ril 9, 2015

the s to ute. sing g an y 1. and eral ysis cult n of 92. low Bike Bay. re a lt in

EvaluAddre

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Bicyx

x


o SR

Traffic calmMoss Beacdevices (ch

Increasing and St. EthMoss Beac

Highway 1

Constructiwith Frenc

Left turn la

o Beo Leo Ha

Passing/Cland Pilarciroadway s

An expansinclude the

o HaFre

o El

o M

o M

ycle andAll Alterna

Instead of demand an

o Gr

o M

o Su

o Ke


R 92 and SR 35

ming implemech. This couldhicanes and s

road capacitheldore Streech and Capist

1 realignment

on of a Frontchman’s Cree

anes at the fo

erta’s Farm mos Farm alf Moon Bay

imbing lanes tos Quarry Roegment as we

ion of the dee following se

alf Moon Bayenchman's Cr

Granada Seg

oss Beach Seg

ontara Segme

d Pedestative 1 and Alt

providing strnd bus stop lo

ray Whale Cov

ontara Sanita

urfer’s Beach

ehoe Avenue

ternatives to

5 east of Half

entation alon include basicspeed humps)

y to two lanet/Vallemar Strano Road (S

t in El Granad

tage Road alok Road

ollowing majo

Nursery

on the eastboad to allow ell as provide

fined curb anegments alon

y Segment ‐reek Road to

ment ‐ Medio

gment ‐ Carlo

ent ‐ between

rian Facternative 2 bi

riped crossingocations, pro

ve

ary District bu

Parking area,

14

f Moon Bay

ng Main Streec measures (s).

es in each diretreet in Moss) in El Granad

a to address s

ong east side o

or businesses

ound portioncars to pass te a passing lan

nd paved shoung Highway 1:

Redondo BeMirada Road

o Avenue to M

os Street to C

n 9th Street a

cility Impicycle and pe

gs with beacovide pedestri

uilding

, north of Cor

Experts Conn

et in Montaraspeed display

ection betwees Beach, and bda.

sea level rise

of Highway 1

along SR 92 i

n of SR‐92 betthe high volumne to go arou

ulder include:

each Road tod

Mirada Road

alifornia Ave

and 14th Stre

provemedestrian facil

ons to alert traian over/unde

ronado Street

necting Commun

and along Cay units) or spe

en 9th Street between Cyp

and erosion

connecting M

in Half Moon

tween the Lame of trucks und right‐turn

d in Alternati

o Miramonte

nue

eet

ents ity improvem

affic at the foer crossings:

t

Ap

nities

arlos Street ineed control

in Montara ress Avenue i

concerns

Main Street

Bay:

ndfill Road on this ning cars.

ives 1 and 2 t

es Point Road

ments

ollowing high

ril 9, 2015

n

in

to

d &

EvaluAddre

x

Trax

x

x

Parx

x

x


Provide a Cto SR‐35.

nsit ImpAll Alterna

Provide anBeach, Mo

o Mo El

These routaccess to h

SamTrans morning a

o PeStaan

o Incan

o ExGr

rking ImpAll Alterna

Diagonal p

Diagonal p


Class II bicycle

provemeative 1 and Alt

n additional Sontara, and Paontara‐Moss Granada‐Mirtes would havhigh demand

service thatnd evening peak period exation with frend stops in Hacrease weekdnd San Mateoxpand the weeranada and Pr

provemeative 1 and Alt

parking for Mo

parking for El

ternatives to

e route along

ents ternative 2 tr

amTrans routacifica: Beach‐Devil’ramar‐North Hve local stopslocations as w

t provides ceak periods wxpress bus sequency of 3alf Moon Bay,day peak pero‐Hillsdale Calekday coverarinceton.

ents ternative 2 pa

oss Beach alo

Granada sepa

15

g State Route

ransit improve

te serving Ha

s Slide Trail roHalf Moon Bas, reducing acwell as conne

onnections twith limited sservice betwe0 minutes du, El Granada, riod frequenctrain Station age of Route 2

arking improv

ong Carlos Str

arated from H

Experts Conn

92 from Mai

ements

alf Moon Bay,

oute ay (to SR 92)ccess distanceections to reg

to regional tstops in ordereen Half Mouring the moMontara, andcy on Route 2from 60 min294 to provid

vements

reet

Highway 1 re

necting Commun

n Street in Ha

, El Granada,

e for users, angional routes

transit providr to decrease oon Bay and rning and evd Pacifica 294 betweenutes to 30 mide connection

alignment

Ap

nities

alf Moon Bay

Princeton, M

nd allow

ders during the travel timDaly City BAening peak h

n Half Moon inutes. ns to El

ril 9, 2015

y

Moss

the me: ART hour

Bay

EvaluAddre

EvaluimproReporfeasibmetri

BecauimprorepreproducurreAppen


ation of alovements to rt. In order tobility/design ccs will be use

x Ro

x Pe

use there aovement was sent a relativuced with furtnt absolute indix B.


EVAternatives waddress defio judge the coconcerns haved for each ty

oadway and In

o Roadw

o Interse

o Effect o

edestrian, Bicy

o Filling gconnec

o Improv

o Improv

o Improv

o Precedstudy

re no formagiven a scoreve improvemther study toimprovement

ternatives to

ALUATIwill primarilyciencies idenost effectivenve been evalupe of propos

ntersection Im

ay Segment L

ction LOS

on vehicle and

ycle, Transit,

gaps in existinctions

ved pedestria

ved access to

ved access to

ent for a proj

al, locally ee according t

ment to existio allow for a ct. Further ex

16

ION Oy determinentified in the ess of the prouated for eaed improvem

mprovements

LOS

d pedestrian

and Parking I

ng bicycle or p

n and bicycle

communities

the shoreline

ject that has a

stablished so the scoringng conditioncomparison oxplanation of

Experts Conn

OF ALTe the effecBuildout Anoposed improch alternativ

ment:

s

safety

Improvement

pedestrian ne

e safety

s, neighborho

e

already been

standards fog system gives. A baselineof relative impf these evalu

necting Commun

TERNActiveness of alysis and Trovements, cove. Additiona

ts

etworks or tra

oods or popul

n recommend

r non‐vehiclen in Table 1. e score for eaprovement inuation metric

Ap

nities

ATIVESthe propo

raffic Projectiost estimates lly the follow

ansit

lar destinatio

ed in a previo

e modes, e These scoresach area cann addition to cs is available

ril 9, 2015

S osed ions and wing

ns

ous

each s all n be this e in

EvaluAddre

Table

M

Conne

Acces

Safety

Shore

Prece

Capita

Annu

ALTIMAlternand wbe imbeing

RoaAlternare ab

None deficiparkindefinepedes


e 1 - Pedest

etric

ectivity Meexicon

ss Mefaccom

y Bo

eline Bo

edent Bopre

al Cost Mepro

al Cost Meop

TERNAPROVEnative 1 mainwithout signifmproved with evaluated.

adway anative 1 incluble to be add

Abilityof the propencies, howeng lot, the aded curb and strian travel a


trian, Bicycl

easures the eisting bicyclennections.

easures the ecilities or mmunities or

nus priority f

nus priority f

nus for a pevious studie

easures the eoject.

easures the eerating and m

ATIVE 1EMENTnly focuses onicant cost or h signage and

nd Interdes very fewressed simply

y to Addrposed improever, the addddition of stopaved shoulalong Highwa

ternatives to

e, Transit, a

Descrip

extent to whe or pedest

extent to whiservice to r existing dest

for safety imp

for enhanced

roject recoms

extent of the e

xtent of the emaintenance

1 – LOWTS n improvemeenvironmentd striping cha

rsection roadway andy with signage

ress Defvements in dition of a lefop signs to uder along Hiy 1.

17

and Parking

ption

ich a projecttrian networ

ich a project currently

tinations.

provements.

public shorel

mmended in

estimated cap

estimated ancosts of a pro

W COST

ents that can tal impact. Thanges as we

Improvd intersectione and striping

ficienciesAlternative 1ft‐turn bay anunsigned integhway 1 will

Experts Conn

g Evaluation

t fills a gap irks or trans

provides newunderserve

line access.

one or mor

pital cost for

nual oject.

T/LOW

be made withese projects ll as improve

vementsn improvemeg.

s 1 address annd acceleratiersections alol all improve

necting Commun

n Metrics

Poin

n it

0(lowconn

w d 0

(low to h

0

0

re 0

a 0(high to

c

0(high to

c

W IMPA

thin the existaddress deficements alrea

ents as few of

ny of the roion lane at Gong Highwaye safety both

Ap

nities

nt Value

0 to 3 w to high nectivity)

0 to 3 high access)

0 or 1

0 or 1

0 or 1

0 to 3 o low capital cost)

0 to 3 low annual cost)

ACT

ting right of wciencies that ady planned

f the deficien

oadway capaGray Whale Cy 1 and havin for vehicle

ril 9, 2015

way can and

cies

acity Cove ng a and

EvaluAddre

Usingshowturns left tu

Table

IntersNum

1 Stan2 ProjAlterndeficimeet

x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x


g signs to restn in Table 2 there will beurns are conso

e 2 - Altern

section mber

LStan

2

3

5

6

7

8

dard is given ect LOS (Buildnative 1 doesencies. With the LOS stan

MidcoasHighway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1

Half MoHighway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1


trict left‐turn for the affec the possibilitolidated.

ative 1 Buil

LOS ndard1

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

for an individdout No Projes not addressthe improvedard during t

st 1 and 2nd Stre1 and Vallema1 and Californ1 and Virginia 1 and Vermon1 and Cypress 1 and St. Ethe1 and Coral Re1 and Magella1 and Medio A1 and Mirama

oon Bay 1 and Mirada 1 and Rooseve1 and Young A1 and Ruisseau

ternatives to

movements cted locationty of violation

dout Condi

Street Na

y 1 / 7th St

y 1 / 8th St

y 1 / Vallema

y 1 / Californi

y 1 / Virginia A

y 1 / Vermont

dual approachect LOS) s any of the rments includthe listed pea

eet (AM, PM, ar Street (PM,ia Avenue (AAvenue (AM

nt Avenue (AMAvenue (AMldore Street (eef Avenue (Aan Avenue (AMAvenue (AM, r Drive (AM,

Road (AM, PMelt BoulevardAvenue (AM, u Francais Av

18

at the followns; however,ns to avoid in

tions Peak

mes

r St

ia Ave

Ave

t Ave (WB)

h (stop contro

remaining stued in Alternaak hours:

Midday) , Midday) M, PM, Midd, PM, MiddayM, PM, Midda, PM, Midday(AM, PM) AM, PM, MiddM, PM, MiddaPM, Midday)PM, Midday)

M, Midday) (AM, PM, MPM, Midday)venue (Midda

Experts Conn

wing key locatwithout any

ncreased dela

Hour Inters

Control Type

TWSC

TWSC

TWSC

TWSC

TWSC

TWSC

olled)

udy intersectiative 1, the fo

day) y) ay) y)

day) ay) )

idday)

y)

necting Commun

tions will imp physical impays at the inte

section Lev

AM Peak Hour LOS2

F (F)

C (F)

F (D)

F (F)

E (F)

F (F)

ion LOS or roollowing inte

Ap

nities

prove the LOSpediment to ersections wh

el of Service

PM Peak Hour

MPH

LOS2 L

F (F) F

C (F) B

F (F) F

F (F) F

F (F) F

F (F) F

oadway segmrsections do

ril 9, 2015

S as left

here

e

idday Peak Hour LOS2

F (F)

B (F)

F (E)

F (F)

F (F)

F (F)

ment not

EvaluAddre

x x x x x x x x x x x

xxx

With the LO

HighwF. WhLOS Eand M

The fothe CM

x x x x x x x x

x Additfollow


Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Main Stree

SR‐92 x SR 92 andx SR 92 andx SR 92 and

the improveOS standard d

Midcoasway 1 betweehile the remaE standard givMiramar Drive

Half Moollowing roadMP:

Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1

SR‐92 SR 92 from

ionally, severwing roadway


1 and Frenchm1 and Venice B1 and Spindrif1 and Kehoe A1 and Grandvi1 and Bellevie1 and Main St1 and Kelly Av1 and Filbert S1 and Seymouet and Lewis F

d Muddy Roadd Skyline Bould SR 35 (PM, M

ments includduring the list

st en Coronado ainder of the ven in the CMe does not me

oon Bay dways segme

1 between Mi1 between Ro1 from Young 1 from Ruissea1 from Venice1 between Fro1 from Spindri1 from Kehoe

m Skyline Bou

ral roadway sy segments do

ternatives to

man’s Creek RBoulevard (AMft Way (AM, PAvenue (AM, ew Boulevardw Boulevard reet (north) (venue (MiddaStreet (AM, Pur Street (AM,Foster Drive (

d/Ox Mountaevard (AM, PMidday)

ed in Alternated peak hou

Street and Mroadway seg

MP, Highway eet the LCP LO

nts within th

ramar Drive aosevelt BouleAvenue to Ruau Francais A Boulevard toontage Road tift Way to KeAvenue to Gr

levard to SR 3

segments fallo not meet th

19

Road (AM, PMM, PM, MiddPM, Midday)PM, Midday)d (AM, PM, M(AM) (PM, Midday)y) M, Midday), PM, Midday(PM)

in Landfill RoPM, Midday)

ative 1, the frs:

Miramar Drive gments within1 along the eOS D standar

e Study Area

and Roosevelevard and Youuisseau FrancAvenue to Veno Frontage Roto Spindrift Whoe Avenue (randview Bou

35 (PM, Midd

below the sthe LCP LOS D

Experts Conn

M, Midday) ay)

Midday)

)

y)

oad (PM, Midd

following road

operates ben the Study Aentire Midcoad during the

a operate belo

lt Boulevard (ung Avenue (cais Avenue (Mnice Boulevaroad (Midday)Way (PM, Mid(Midday) ulevard (AM,

day)

tricter standastandard dur

necting Commun

day)

dway segmen

low the CMPArea operateast region belisted peak ho

ow the LOS s

(Midday) (PM, Midday)Midday) rd (PM, Midda dday)

PM, Midday)

ard provided ring the listed

Ap

nities

nts do not m

standard at better thanetween 1st Strours.

tandard give

)

ay)

)

by the LCP. d peak hours:

ril 9, 2015

meet

LOS the reet

n in

The

EvaluAddre

x x x

x x x

Cost standmobilcosts

Table

# Im

1 Gr

2 Tu

3 SR

4 SR

1 Draf

Thereroadw

The fo

x

x

A full


Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1

SR‐92 SR 92 fromSR 92 fromSR 92 betw

Cost Esestimates foard unit costlization, consis included in

e 3 - Cost E

mprovement

ray Whale Co

urn Restrictio

R‐1 Side‐Stree

R‐1 Paved Sho

ft PPS for Con

Feasibe are no feaway and inter

ollowing desig

Adequate Whale parpotential f

Given the expensive

listing of imp


1 between Mi1 between Ke1 between Re

m Main Streetm Skyline Bouween SR 35 an

stimatesor the Alternts and are lisstruction engn Appendix A

Estimates fo

ove Turn and A

n Signage

et Stop Signs

oulder and Cu

ngestion Man

bility andsibility concesection impro

gn considerat

vehicle storarking lot shoufor queue spil

topography to provide pa

provements w

ternatives to

ramar Drive ally Avenue andondo Beach

t to Skyline Bolevard to SR 3nd I‐280 (AM

s ative 1 propsted in Tablegineering, pe.

r Alternativ

Acceleration

urb

agement and

d Designerns that weovements.

tions were id

age length fould be includellback.

of the landaved shoulde

with feasibility

20

and Grandviend Seymour Sh Road and Fa

oulevard (AM35 (AM, PM, , PM)

posed improve 3. Cost estrmits, design

ve 1 Roadwa

Lanes1

d Safety Impro

n Concerere identified

entified:

or the proposed for the ex

adjacent toers and curb.

y and design c

Experts Conn

ew Boulevard Street (AM, PMairway Drive (

M, PM) Midday)

vements haveimates includn, and contin

ay and Inter

T

ovements, 20

rns d for any of

sed southbouxpected dema

o Highway 1,

consideration

necting Commun

(AM, PM, MM) (AM, PM)

e been calcude contract ingency. A fu

rsection Im

Co

$

$

$

$ 2

Total: $ 3

014

the Alternat

und left‐turn and in order

, some locat

ns is included

Ap

nities

idday)

ulated baseditems as welll breakdown

mprovement

ost Estimate

960,000

40,000

18,000

2,302,000

3,320,000

tive 1 propo

bay at the Gto minimize

tions may pr

d in Appendix

ril 9, 2015

on l as n of

ts

osed

Gray the

rove

x B.

EvaluAddre

Bicy

The plisting

Table

#

1

2

3 T

4 C



ycle and

Abilityproposed impg of scores is

e 4 - Altern

Project

Pedestrian Crossings

Sidewalks

Traffic signal updates

Community Street

Sharrows



d Pedest

y to Addrprovements wprovided in A

ative 1 Bicy

Connectivi(0 to 3)

1

1

1

1


ternatives to

rian Fac

ress Defwere given thAppendix B.

ycle and Ped

ty Access(0 to 3)

1

1

0

2


21

cility Imp

ficiencieshe following

destrian Eva

)

Safety(0 or 1)

1

1

1

1


Experts Conn

proveme

s scores for t

aluation Sco

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

0

0

0


necting Commun

ents

he evaluation

ores

e Preceden(0 or 1)

1

1

0

1


Ap

nities

n metrics. A

nt

ImpactSubtota

5

4

2

5


ril 9, 2015

full

al

on l as n of

EvaluAddre

Table

#

1

2A

3

4A

4B

Thereand p

The fo

x

x

A full

Tra

The plisting

Table

#

5

6


e 5 - Cost E

Improvemen

Striped Pede

SR‐1 Sidewa

Traffic Signa

Sharrows on

Sharrows on

Feasibe are no feasipedestrian im

ollowing desig

The beachlocation th

The Parallengineerincould requ

listing of imp

nsit Imp


e 6 - Altern

Project

Bus Stop Amenities

Increased Weekend Samtrans service


Estimates fo

nt

estrian Crossi

lk (Phase A)

al Updates

n Main Street

n Carlos Stree

bility Conbility concernprovements.

gn considerat

h access croshat would acc

el Trail woung cost. Addiuire mitigatio

provements w

proveme


ative 1 Tran

Connectivi(0 to 3)

0

2

ternatives to

r Alternativ

ng with Beac

et

ncerns ns that were i

tions were id

sswalk at thecommodate t

ld be expectitionally it mn.

with feasibility

ents


nsit Evaluat

ty Access(0 to 3)

0

2

22

ve 1 Bicycle

cons

identified for

entified:

Gray Whalehe southboun

ted to have amay encumbe

y and design c


tion Scores

)

Safety(0 or 1)

1

0

Experts Conn

e and Pedest

r any of the A

e Cove parkinnd storage la

an uneven per significant

consideration

s scores for t

Shoreline(0 or 1)

0

0

necting Commun

trian Impro

C

$

$

$

$

$

Total: $

Alternative 1 p

ng lot shouldne.

profile and menvironment

ns is included

he evaluation

e Preceden(0 or 1)

0

0

Ap

nities

ovements

Cost Estimate

2,550,000

1,475,000

1,624,000

44,000

43,000

5,736,000

proposed bicy

d be placed a

may carry a htal impacts t

d in Appendix

n metrics. A

nt

ImpactSubtota

1

4

ril 9, 2015

e

ycle

at a

high that

x B.

full

al

EvaluAddre

Cost standmobilcosts opera

Table

#

1

2

TherepropoA demdema

A full

Par

The plisting

Table

#

7

8

9


Cost Esestimates foard unit costlization, consis included iating costs of

e 7 - Cost E

Improvemen

Bus Stop Am

Increased W

Feasibe are no feaosed transit immand study wand to warran

listing of imp

rking Imp


e 8 - Altern

Project

Montara State Beach Parking

Gray Whale Cove

Parking Lot

Improved Wayfinding


stimatesor the Alternts and are lisstruction engn Appendix Aweekend Sam

Estimates fo

nt

menities

Weekend Sa

bility Consibility or demprovementswould need tnt improveme

provements w

proveme


ative 1 Park

Connectivi(0 to 3)

1

1

1

ternatives to

s ative 1 propsted in Tablegineering, peA. Cost estimmTrans Route

r Alternativ

mtrans serv

ncerns esign concerns. There are 7o be performent.

with feasibility

ents

ress Defwere given thAppendix C.

king Evaluat

ty Access(0 to 3)

1

1

1

23


mates for incre 17 and 294.

ve 1 Transit

ice

ns that were77 active busmed in order

y and design c


tion Scores

)

Safety(0 or 1)

0

0

0

Experts Conn

vements haveimates includn, and continreased transi

t Improvem

e identified fs stops locateto identify w

consideration

s scores for t

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

1

1

necting Commun

e been calcude contract ingency. A fut service is b

ments

C

$

$

for any of thed throughoutwhich bus sto

ns is included

he evaluation

e Preceden(0 or 1)

1

1

0

Ap

nities

ulated baseditems as welll breakdownbased on curr

Cost Estimate

156,000 /stop

525,000

he Alternativt the study aops have eno

d in Appendix

n metrics. A

nt

ImpactSubtota

4

4

3

ril 9, 2015

on l as n of rent

e

p

ve 1 rea. ugh

x A.

full

al

EvaluAddre

#


Table

#

1

2

3

Thereimpro

The fo

x

A full

ALTIMAlternBuildoHighwof anconsidbeingservicTheseenviro


Project

Signs


e 9 - Cost E

Improvemen

Montara Sta

Gray Whale

Wayfinding

Feasibe are no feasibovements.

ollowing desig

The proponorthboun

listing of imp

TERNAPACT Inative 2 addrout by reducway 1. This is nd on to Higders supplem evaluated ace (e.g. shutte improvemonmental imp


Connectivi(0 to 3)


Estimates fo

nt

ate Beach Par

Cove Parking

Signage

bility Conbility concern

gn considerat

osed parking nd traffic.

provements w

ATIVE 2IMPROresses intersecing the numdone throug

ghway 1 or bmentary bike ls part of Platles and parkents requirepact.

ternatives to

ty Access(0 to 3)


r Alternativ

rking Lot Impr

g Lot Improve


tions were id

lot for Mon

with feasibility

2 – MEDOVEMEection LOS atmber of locagh the additioby blocking anes along Aan Princeton, k‐and‐ride lote a modera

24

)

Safety(0 or 1)


ve 1 Parking

rovements

ements

dentified for

entified:

ntara State B

y and design c

DIUM CNTS t intersectiontions where on of raised maccess to Hi

Airport Street as well as dts) and additate amount

Experts Conn

Shoreline(0 or 1)


g Improvem

any of the Al

Beach should

consideration

COST/M

ns that do notraffic can

medians physighway 1 coand Capistrademand‐focustional parkint of capital

necting Commun

e Preceden(0 or 1)


ments

C

$

$

$

Total: $

lternative 1 p

d include a l

ns is included

MEDIU

ot meet the have unrestically restrictmpletely. Altano Road, whsed improvemg in high de investment

Ap

nities

nt

ImpactSubtota


Cost Estimate

557,000

1,052,000

303,000

1,912,000

proposed park

eft‐turn bay

d in Appendix

UM

LCP standardricted accessting left turnsternative 2 aich are currements to traemand locatiot and mini

ril 9, 2015

al

on l as n of

e

king

for

x B.

d at s to s off also ntly nsit ons. mal

EvaluAddre

Roa

In addmediaVirginenter 1/Cyp

Theseshowconsoand atraffic

Alterndefici

TableServi

IntersNum

21 Stan2 ProjWith stand

x


adway a

Abilitydition to theans to restricnia Avenue inHighway 1 a

press Avenue

e proposed imn in Table 10olidates traffia resulting LOc results in a w

native 2 doesencies.

e 10 - Alterice

section mber

LStan

2

3

5

6

7

8

9

27

dard is given ect LOS (Buildthe improvemard during th

MidcoasHighway 1


nd Inter

y to Addr proposed imct turning mon Moss Beachat the high vin Moss Beac

mprovement0 for the affec at VallemaOS F becauseworsening of

s not address

native 2 Bu

LOS ndard1

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D Hwy

D SR 1

E Hwy

for an individdout No Projements includehe listed peak

st 1 and 2nd Stre

ternatives to

rsection

ress Defmprovementsovements at h. Signalizatioolume intersch and Highw

s will result ected locationar and Vermoe of the high LOS at Highw

s any of the r

ildout Cond

Street Na

y 1 / 7th St

y 1 / 8th St

y 1 / Vallema

y 1 / Californi

y 1 / Virginia A

y 1 / Vermont

1 / Cypress A

y 1 / Kehoe A

dual approachect LOS) ed in Alternatk hours:

eet (AM, PM,

25

Improv

ficienciess in Alternati8th Street inon will improsections of Hiway 1/Kehoe A

in the followns. While theont, the eastvolumes alo

way 1/Vallem

remaining stu

ditions Peak

ames

r St

ia Ave

Ave

t Ave (WB)

Avenue

Ave

h (stop contro

tive 2, the fol

Midday)

Experts Conn

vements

s ve 1, Alternan Montara aove the abilitighway 1/CalAvenue in Ha

wing changese restricted wbound trafficong Highway ar Street

udy intersecti

k Hour Inte

Control Type

TWSC

TWSC

TWSC

Signal

TWSC

TWSC

Signal

Signal

olled)

llowing inters

necting Commun

ative 22 will nd at Califorty for minor lifornia Avenlf Moon Bay.

s to the intewestbound acc still experie1. Additiona

ion LOS or ro

rsection Le

AM Peak Hour LOS2

F (F)

C (F)

F (D)

A (F)

E (F)

F (F)

B (F)

E (F)

sections do n

Ap

nities

include physrnia Avenue street trafficue and Highw

ersection LOSccess diverts ences high delly, the diver

oadway segm

vel of

PM Peak Hour

M

LOS2

F (F)

C (F)

F (F)

A (F)

F (F)

F (F)

C (F)

D (F)

not meet the

ril 9, 2015

sical and c to way

S as and elay rted

ment

Midday Peak Hour LOS2

F (F)

B (F)

F (E)

B (F)

F (F)

F (F)

B (F)

B (F)

LOS

EvaluAddre

x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

xxx

With the LO

HighwF. WhLOS Eand M

The fothe CM



Half MoHighway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Main Stree



Midcoasway 1 betweehile the remaE standard givMiramar Drive



1 and Vallema1 and Virginia 1 and Vermon1 and St. Ethe1 and Coral Re1 and Magella1 and Medio A1 and Mirama

oon Bay 1 and Mirada 1 and Rooseve1 and Young A1 and Ruisseau1 and Frenchm1 and Venice B1 and Spindrif1 and Kehoe A1 and Grandvi1 and Bellevie1 and Main St1 and Kelly Av1 and Filbert S1 and Seymouet and Lewis F



st en Coronado ainder of the ven in the CMe does not me

oon Bay dways segme

ternatives to

ar Street (AM,Avenue (AM

nt Avenue (AMldore Street (eef Avenue (Aan Avenue (AMAvenue (AM, r Drive (AM,

Road (AM, PMelt BoulevardAvenue (AM, u Francais Avman’s Creek RBoulevard (AMft Way (AM, PAvenue (AM)ew Boulevardw Boulevard reet (north) (venue (MiddaStreet (AM, Pur Street (AM,Foster Drive (




MP, Highway eet the LCP LO

nts within th

26

, PM, Midday, PM, MiddayM, PM, Midda(AM, PM) AM, PM, MiddM, PM, MiddaPM, Midday)PM, Midday)

M, Midday) (AM, PM, MPM, Midday)venue (MiddaRoad (AM, PMM, PM, MiddPM, Midday)

d (AM, PM, M(AM) (PM, Midday)y) M, Midday), PM, Midday(PM)


ative 1, the frs:

Miramar Drive gments within1 along the eOS D standar

e Study Area

Experts Conn

y) y) ay)

day) ay) )

idday)

y) M, Midday) ay)

Midday)

)

y)

oad (PM, Midd

following road

operates ben the Study Aentire Midcoad during the

a operate belo

necting Commun

day)

dway segmen

low the CMPArea operateast region belisted peak ho

ow the LOS s

Ap

nities

nts do not m

standard at better thanetween 1st Strours.

tandard give

ril 9, 2015

meet

LOS the reet

n in

EvaluAddre

x x x x x x x x

x Additfollow

x x x

x x x

Cost eunit cconstin App

TableImpr

#

4B

5

6

7

8



SR‐92 SR 92 from



SR‐92 SR 92 fromSR 92 fromSR 92 betw

Cost Esestimates forcosts and are ruction enginpendix A.

e 11 - Cost rovements

Improveme

Carried over

Hwy 1 Paved

California Av

Cypress Ave

Kehoe Aven

Main Street


1 between Mi1 between Ro1 from Young 1 from Ruissea1 from Venice1 between Fro1 from Spindri1 from Kehoe

m Skyline Bou



m Main Streetm Skyline Bouween SR 35 an

stimatesr Alternative 2listed in Tablneering, desig

Estimates fo

nt

r1 Alternative

d Shoulder an

venue Signal

nue Signal

ue Signal

(S) Signal

ternatives to

ramar Drive aosevelt BouleAvenue to Ruau Francais A Boulevard toontage Road tift Way to KeAvenue to Gr

levard to SR 3



t to Skyline Bolevard to SR 3nd I‐280 (AM

s 2 proposed imle 11. Cost esgn, permits, a

for Alternat

1 options

nd Curb (Phas

27

and Roosevelevard and Youuisseau FrancAvenue to Veno Frontage Roto Spindrift Whoe Avenue (randview Bou

35 (PM, Midd



oulevard (AM35 (AM, PM, , PM)

mprovementsstimates incluand contingen

tive 2 Roadw

se B)

Experts Conn

lt Boulevard (ung Avenue (cais Avenue (Mnice Boulevaroad (Midday)Way (PM, Mid(Midday) ulevard (AM,

day)



M, PM) Midday)

s have been cude contract ncy. A full br

way and Inte

necting Commun

(Midday) (PM, Midday)Midday) rd (PM, Midda dday)

PM, Midday)



calculated baitems as wellreakdown of

ersection

Ap

nities

)

ay)

)


idday)

ased on stand as mobilizatcosts is inclu

Cost Est

$ 2,76

$ 2,84

$ 76

$ 64

$ 64

$ 53

ril 9, 2015

The

dard ion, ded

imate

0,000

1,000

67,000

40,000

40,000

30,000

EvaluAddre

9

10

11

12A

12B

13

14

1 Doerestric2 TheBouledrivew

Thereroadw

The fo

x

x

A full

Bicy

The plisting

Table

#

10


Hwy 1 Medi

Hwy 1 Acces

Montara Lig

Nurserymen

Nurserymen

Frenchman'

Terrace Ave

es not includction projectse minimal alevard while thway directly s

Feasibe are no feaway and inter

ollowing desig

All design

SignalizatioconsideratAdditionalopportunit

listing of imp

ycle and


e 12 - Alter

Project

Parallel Trail


an and Left T

ss Restriction

ghthouse Med

n's Exchange A

n's Exchange A

s Creek Road

nue/Grand B

de Turn Restrs ternative inche expandedsouth of Youn

bility Consibility concesection impro

gn considerat

consideration

on of the Higtions becausely, striping eties.

provements w

d Pedest


native 2 Bic

Connectiv(0 to 3)

3

ternatives to

Turn Bay in M

s in Moss Bea

dian and Left

Access Consol

Access Consol

Realignment

oulevard Acc

riction Signag

cludes a fro alternative wng Avenue an

ncerns erns that weovements.

tions were id

ns noted for A

ghway 1/Calife of the Wienhancements

with feasibility

rian Fac


cycle and Pe

vity Access(0 to 3

3

28

ontara

ach

Turn Bay

lidation (Mini

lidation (Expa

t and Access C

ess Consolida

To

To

ge as it has

ntage road would contind north to M

ere identified

entified:

Alternative 1

fornia Avenunke Way leg s may be nec

y and design c

cility Imp


edestrian Ev

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

1

Experts Conn

imal Alternat

anded Alterna

Consolidation

ation and Sign

tal (assuming

otal (assuming

been replac

between Yonue the frontirada Road.

d for any of

e intersectiothat makes

cessary to cre

consideration

proveme

s scores for t

valuation Sc

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

necting Commun

tive)2

ative)

n

nalization

g Project 12A

g Project 12B

ced with med

oung Avenuetage road sou

the Alternat

n may requirit a five leggeate safe ped

ns is included

ents

he evaluation

cores

e Precede(0 or 1

1

Ap

nities

$ 22

$ 26

$ 17

$ 1,521

$ 2,851

$ 1,18

$ 1,27

A): $ 12,81

B): $ 14,14

dian and acc

e and Rooseuth to cover

tive 2 propo

re careful desged intersectdestrian cross

d in Appendix

n metrics. A

ent 1)

ImpacSubtota

9

ril 9, 2015

25,000

68,000

70,000

1,000

1,000

2,000

0,000

4,000

44,000

cess

velt the

osed

sign ion. sing

x B.

full

t al

EvaluAddre

#

11

12



Project

Coastal Trail

Class II Bike Lanes on Airport

Street and Capistrano

Road



Connectiv(0 to 3)

2

2


ternatives to

vity Access(0 to 3

2

1


29

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

1

1


Experts Conn

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

0


necting Commun

e Precede(0 or 1

1

1


Ap

nities

ent 1)

ImpacSubtota

7

5


ril 9, 2015

t al

dard ion, ded

EvaluAddre

Table

#

2B

5

6

7

9

10

11

1Cost estabdollar

Thereand p

The fo

x

x

A full

Tra

The plisting


e 13 - Cost

Improveme

Carried over

Hwy 1 Sidew

Coronado St

Parallel Trai

Coastal Trail

Main Street

Capistrano R

Airport Stree

estimates folished in the rs

Feasibe are no feasipedestrian im

ollowing desig

All design

Lane widthand Airpor

listing of imp

nsit Imp



Estimates fo

nt

r Alternative 1

walk (Phase B

treet and Ave

l adjacent to

l throughout

Class III Bike

Road Bicycle F

et Class II Bik

r these projec2002 Mid‐Co

bility Conbility concernprovements.

gn considerat

consideration

h should be nrt Street in or

provements w

proveme


ternatives to

for Alternat

1 options

)

e Alhambra Si

Highway 1 fo

the entire stu

Route

Facilities

e Lanes

cts are basedast Recreatio


tions were id

ns noted for A

narrowed alonrder to enhan

with feasibility

ents


30

tive 2 Bicycl

dewalk

or the entire s

udy area1

To

on per mile Conal Needs As

identified for

entified:

Alternative 1

ng the proponce the traffic

y and design c


Experts Conn

le and Pede

study area1

otal (assuming

Class 1 pavedssessment (pg

r any of the A

osed Class II bc calming effe

consideration

s scores for t

necting Commun

estrian Impr

g Project 12B

d bike trail cog 62), and adj

Alternative 2 p

bike lanes on ect.

ns is included

he evaluation

Ap

nities

rovements

Cost Est

$ 5,736

$ 1,80

$ 74

$ 11,03

$ 5,25

$ 8

$ 86

$ 4,23

B): $ 29,768

st estimates justed for 201

proposed bicy

Capistrano R

d in Appendix

n metrics. A

ril 9, 2015

imate

6,000

6,000

49,000

7,000

1,000

85,000

66,000

8,000

8,000

14

ycle

oad

x B.

full

EvaluAddre

Table

#

13 S

14

15 S

Cost eand aprivatpark‐anegot

Therepropo

A full

Par

The plisting


e 14 - Alter

Project

Special EventShuttle Service

Park‐and‐Ride Lots

School Buses

Cost Esestimates forre not includte company and‐ride lotstiation of cost

Feasibe are no feaosed transit im

listing of imp

rking Imp



native 2 Tra

Connectiv(0 to 3)

3

2

2

stimatesr shuttle and ed in this docas well as ons have a mint with private

bility Consibility or demprovements

provements w

proveme


ternatives to

ansit Evalua

vity Access(0 to 3

2

2

2

s school bus secument as thengoing operanimal cost ese lot owners.

ncerns esign concerns.

with feasibility

ents


31

ation Scores

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

0

0

0

ervice are coey would reqation, maintestimate as th

ns that were

y and design c


Experts Conn

s

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

0

0

nsidered outuire acquisitienance, and hey involve t

e identified f

consideration

s scores for t

necting Commun

e Precede(0 or 1)

0

0

0

t of the scopeon or lease ostorage coststhe use of e

for any of th

ns is included

he evaluation

Ap

nities

nt )

ImpactSubtota

6

4

4

e for this prof vehicles fros. The propoexisting lots

he Alternativ

d in Appendix

n metrics. A

ril 9, 2015

t al

ject m a osed and

ve 2

x B.

full

EvaluAddre

Table

#

17


Table

#

4

Thereimpro

The fo

x

x

A full


e 15 - Alter

Project

Parking lot for Rancho Corral de Tierra


e 16 - Cost

Improveme

Carried over

Rancho Corr

Feasibe are no feasibovements.

ollowing desig

All design

The designshould haFlashing Bpresence o

listing of imp


native 2 Par

Connectiv(0 to 3)

1


Estimates fo

nt

r Alternative 1

ral de Tierra P


gn considerat

consideration

nated crosswve high visibeacon shouldof pedestrian

provements w

ternatives to

rking Evalua

vity Access(0 to 3

1


for Alternat

1 options

Parking Lot


tions were id

ns noted for A

walk for the bility for Highd be consides and bicyclis

with feasibility

32

ation Score

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

0


tive 2 Parkin

dentified for

entified:

Alternative 1

proposed Rahway 1 traffred as an effsts.

y and design c

Experts Conn

es

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1


ng Improve

any of the Al

ncho Corral fic. The instafective meas

consideration

necting Commun

e Precedet

(0 or 1)

1


ments

Tota

lternative 2 p

de Tierra acllation of Reure to alert

ns is included

Ap

nities

en

)

ImpactSubtota

4


Cost Est

$ 1,912

$ 2,34

al: $ 4,258

proposed park

ccess parkingectangular Ramotorists of

d in Appendix

ril 9, 2015

t al

dard ion, ded

imate

2,000

6,000

8,000

king

g lot apid the

x B.

EvaluAddre

ALTIMAlterncapacpropoHighwrise acoast,travellanes pedesHighwsafe improoperaimpac

Roa

IncreaEtheldCapistsegmesegmehighestill o


TERNAPROVEnative 3 buildcity through osing an alterway 1. Highwnd erosion co, south of Higl lanes along to reduce bstrian over/uway 1 withoutbicycle commoved with perating investmct to Midcoas

adway a

Abilityasing the roadore Street/Vtrano Road (ents from LOents it is not r density areperate worse


ATIVE 3EMENTds on the impthe proposenate route way 1 would uoncerns, whicghway 1. WhSR 92, capacbottlenecks cnder crossingt interfering wmuting betwrmanent locaent, potentiast communitie

nd Inter

y to Addrd capacity toVallemar Stre(S) in El GranS E to LOS A/suggested toeas with highe than the sta

ternatives to

3 – HIGTS rovements pred addition owithin Half Moundergo a comch would alsoile the existinity can be imaused by trugs at high dewith traffic floween San Mal routes. Thesally require aces and Half M

rsection

ress Defo two lanes inet in Moss Benada results /B under Buildo add additionher occurrencndard.

33

H COST

rovided in Altof travel lanoon Bay throumplete realigo include a lang terrain womproved by thuck traffic aloemand locatioow as well as ateo and Hase improvemecquisition of rMoon Bay.

Improv

ficienciesn each directieach and betin an improdout conditional capacity aces of pedest

Experts Conn

T/HIGH

ternative 1 annes in portiough the additgnment in El rge addition ould make it dhe addition ofong SR 92. Aons to allow Class II Bike

alf Moon Bayents require right of way a

vements

s ion between tween Cypresvement to Rons as shown as it may encotrian crossing

necting Commun

H IMPA

nd Alternativeons of the Mion of a frontGranada to aof parking cadifficult to prf occasional pAlternative 3 for pedestrilanes along Sy. Transit sea large amouand will resu

9th Street in ss Avenue in Road Segmenin Table 17. ourage fastergs. The unaff

Ap

nities

ACT

e 2 by increasMidcoast andtage road easaddress sea leapacity along rovide additiopassing/climbalso introduan traffic acrR 92 to allowervice would unt of capital lt in a signific

Montara andMoss Beach nt LOS for thOutside of thr speeds throfected segme

ril 9, 2015

sing by st of evel the onal bing uces ross w for

be and cant

d St. and hose hese ugh ents

EvaluAddre

TableServi

SegmNum

1

1 Proj

The a18 forof lanaerialAppe

The foround

x x x

Additof a ro

x x

This inhoursdiffer


e 17 - Alterice

ment mber

4 Hwy

Hwy

8 Hwy

Hwy

9 Hwy

Hwy

10 Hwy

Hwy

ect LOS (Build

ddition of rour the affectednes for the m view showinndix C.

ollowing thredabout over t

Highway 1Highway 1SR‐92 & SR

ionally, the fooundabout ov

Highway 1Main Stree

nconsistency s being more ently to acco


rnative 3 Bu

y 1 from 9th S

y 1 from Carlo

y 1 from Cypr

y 1 from St. E

y 1 from St. E

y 1 from Capi

y 1 from Capi

y 1 from Cora

dout No Proje

undabouts atd locations. Thmajor approacng the minim

ee locations sthe no‐projec

1 & Coronado1 & Kehoe AveR‐35

ollowing locatver the no‐pr

1 & Main Street & SR‐92

of improvemthan the capaunt for peak

ternatives to

uildout Cond

Location

St to Carlos S

os St to 9th S

ress Ave to St

Etheldore St to

Etheldore St to

istrano Rd N t

istrano Rd N t

al Reef Ave to

ect LOS)

t the followinhe number ofch and the amum paving

how consistet alternative:

Street enue

tions show mroject alterna

et

ment is due toacity of the rohour volume

34

ditions Peak

t

t

t. Etheldore S

o Cypress Ave

o Capistrano

to St. Etheldo

to Coral Reef

o Capistrano R

g locations ref roundaboutmount of tradiameter is s

ent improvem

mixed improvetive:

an increase ooundabout. Ws, the capacit

Experts Conn

k Hour Roa

AM PeHouLOS

A (E

A (E

St A (E

e A (E

Rd N A (E

ore St A (E

Ave A (E

Rd N A (E

esults in the Lt lanes was anaffic expectedshown for ea

ment of LOS w

ement of LOS

of traffic turnWhile traffic sty of a rounda

necting Commun

adway Segm

eak ur

PM PeHour

S1 LOS1

E) A (E)

E) A (E)

E) A (E)

E) A (E)

E) B (E)

E) A (E)

E) B (E)

E) A (E)

LOS changes dnalyzed basedd to use the ach proposed

with the impl

S with the imp

ning during cesignals can beabout cannot

Ap

nities

ment Level o

eak r

MiddPeak H

1 LOS

) B (E

) A (E

) B (E

) A (E

) A (E

) A (E

) A (E

) A (E

detailed in Tad on the numroundabout.d roundabou

lementation o

plementation

ertain peak e timed t be adjusted.

ril 9, 2015

of

ay Hour 1

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

able mber . An t in

of a

n

.

EvaluAddre

TableServi

IntersNum

N

1

1

1

2

3

3

4

3

41 Not 2 Proj

With stand

x x x x x x x x x


e 18 - Alterice

section mber Sta

N/A

5

9

11

14

19

27

32

33

42

38

48

a study interect LOS (Build

the improvemard during th

MidcoasHighway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1


native 3 Bu

LOS andard1

Ro

D Sin

D Sin

D Sin

D Do

D Do

E Sin

E Do

E Do

E Do

F Do

E Do

D Do

section dout No Proje

ments includehe listed peak

st 1 and 2nd Stre1 and Vallema1 and Californ1 and Virginia 1 and Vermon1 and Cypress 1 and Capistra1 and St. Ethe1 and Coral Re

ternatives to

ildout Cond

undaboutLanes

ngle H

ngle H

ngle H

ouble H

ouble H

ngle H

ouble H

ouble H

ouble H

ouble M

ouble HR

ouble S

ect LOS)

ed in Alternatk hours:

eet (AM, PM, ar Street (PM,ia Avenue (AAvenue (AM

nt Avenue (AMAvenue (AM

ano Road (S) (ldore Street (eef Avenue (A

35

ditions Peak

Street

Hwy 1 / 9th St

Hwy 1 / Valle

Hwy 1 / Cypre

Hwy 1 / Capis

Hwy 1 / Coro

Hwy 1 / Mira

Hwy 1 / Keho

Hwy 1 / Main

Hwy 1 / SR 92

Main Street /

Hwy 1 / HiggiRoad/Main St

SR 92 / SR 35

tive 3, the fol

Midday) , Midday) M, PM, Midd, PM, MiddayM, PM, Midda, PM, Midday(PM) (AM, PM) AM, PM, Midd

Experts Conn

k Hour Inte

t Names

treet1

emar (N)

ess Avenue

strano Road (

nado Street

da Road

oe Avenue

n Street (N)

2

/ SR 92

ins Canyon treet (S)

llowing inters

day) y) ay) y)

day)

necting Commun

rsection Le

AM Peak Hour LOS2

N/A

D (D)

F (F)

(S) C (C)

D (D)

F (F)

C (F)

F (D)

F (C)

B (D)

A (A)

C (D)

sections do n

Ap

nities

vel of

PM Peak Hour

M

LOS2

N/A

F (F)

F (F)

D (C)

C (C)

F (F)

B (F)

E (F)

F (D)

D (C)

B (A)

E (F)

not meet the

ril 9, 2015

Midday Peak Hour LOS2

N/A

F (E)

F (F)

E (D)

C (E)

F (F)

C (F)

F (F)

F (F)

D (F)

C (A)

F (F)

LOS

EvaluAddre

x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

xxx

With the LO

HighwF. WhLOS Eand Mthe se

x x

The fothe CM

x x



Half MoHighway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Main Stree



Midcoasway 1 betweehile the remaE standard givMiramar Driveegments prop

Highway 1Highway 1


Highway 1Highway 1


1 and Magella1 and Medio A1 and Mirama

oon Bay 1 and Mirada 1 and Rooseve1 and Young A1 and Ruisseau1 and Frenchm1 and Venice B1 and Spindrif1 and Grandvi1 and Bellevie1 and Main St1 and SR‐92 (A1 and Kelly Av1 and Filbert S1 and Seymouet and Lewis F



st en Coronado ainder of the ven in the CMe does not mposed to be w

1 between 9th 1 between Cyp

oon Bay dways segme

1 between Mi1 between Ro

ternatives to

an Avenue (AMAvenue (AM, r Drive (AM,

Road (AM, PMelt BoulevardAvenue (AM, u Francais Avman’s Creek RBoulevard (AMft Way (AM, Pew Boulevardw Boulevard reet (N) (AM,AM, PM, Middvenue (MiddaStreet (AM, Pur Street (AM,Foster Drive (




MP, Highway eet the LCP Lwidened:

Street and Cpress Ave and

nts within th

ramar Drive aosevelt Boule

36

M, PM, MiddaPM, Midday)PM, Midday)

M, Midday) (AM, PM, MPM, Midday)venue (MiddaRoad (AM, PMM, PM, MiddPM, Midday)d (AM, PM, M(AM) , PM, Middayday) y) M, Midday), PM, Midday(PM)


ative 1, the frs:

Miramar Drive gments within1 along the eLOS D standa

arlos Streetd Coral Reef R

e Study Area

and Roosevelevard and You

Experts Conn

ay) )

idday)

y) M, Midday) ay)

Midday)

y)

y)

oad (PM, Midd

following road

operates ben the Study Aentire Midcoard during the

Road

a operate belo

lt Boulevard (ung Avenue (

necting Commun

day)

dway segmen

low the CMPArea operateast region bee listed peak

ow the LOS s

(Midday) (PM, Midday)

Ap

nities

nts do not m

standard at better than etween 1st Strhours expect

tandard give

)

ril 9, 2015

meet

LOS the reet t for

n in

EvaluAddre

x x x x x x

x Additfollow

x x x

x x



Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1Highway 1

SR‐92 SR 92 from



SR‐92 SR 92 fromSR 92 from



1 from Young 1 from Ruissea1 from Venice1 between Fro1 from Spindri1 from Kehoe

m Skyline Bou



m Main Streetm Skyline Bou


ternatives to

Avenue to Ruau Francais A Boulevard toontage Road tift Way to KeAvenue to Gr

levard to SR 3



t to Skyline Bolevard to SR 3

s 3 proposed imle 19. Cost esgns, permits,

37

uisseau FrancAvenue to Veno Frontage Roto Spindrift Whoe Avenue (randview Bou

35 (PM, Midd



oulevard (AM35 (AM, PM,

mprovementsstimates incluand continge

Experts Conn

cais Avenue (Mnice Boulevaroad (Midday)Way (PM, Mid(Midday) ulevard (AM,

day)



M, PM) Midday)

s have been cude contract ency. A full br

necting Commun

Midday) rd (PM, Midda dday)

PM, Midday)




Ap

nities

ay)

)


idday)


ril 9, 2015

The

dard ion, ded

EvaluAddre

TableImpr

# I

C

C

4B H

15 9

16 E

17 C

18 C

19 C

20 M

21 K

22 M

23 H

24 S

25 H

26 S

27 M

28 C

29 H

30 H

31 S

32 S

33 H

1 Doe2 Costincludgreatl3Cost


e 19 - Cost rovements

Improvement

Carried over1

Carried over1

Hwy 1 Paved

9th Street Ro

Etheldore Str

Cypress Aven

Capistrano Ro

Coronado Str

Mirada Road

Kehoe Avenu

Main Street (

Hwy 1/SR‐92

SR‐92/Main S

Higgins Canyo

SR‐92/SR‐35 R

Main Street T

Carlos Street

Highway 1 Re

Hwy 1 East Si

SR‐92 Left Tu

SR‐92 Passing

Hwy 1 Widen

s not include t estimates ade right‐of‐wly underestimestimates do


estimates fo

t

Alternative 1

Alternative 1

Shoulder and

undabout

eet Roundab

ue Roundabo

oad Roundab

eet Roundab

Roundabout

e Roundabou

N) Roundabo

Roundabout

Street Rounda

on Road Roun

Roundabout

Traffic Calmin

Traffic Calmin

ealignment (C

de Frontage R

rn Lanes

g/Climbing La

ing to 4 Lane

signalizationre not includ

way acquisitiomate the cost o not include

ternatives to

or Alternat

1 and 2 option

1 and 2 option

d Curb (Phase

out

out

out

out

ut

out

about

ndabout

g

ng

Center Alignm

Road in Half M

nes

s

projects as tded for the fron, and any

any right‐of‐w

38

ive 3 Roadw

ns with Projec

ns with Projec

e C)

ment)

Moon Bay2

Total (assu

Total (assu

hey have beerontage road cost estimat

way acquisitio

Experts Conn

way and Inte

ct 12A

ct 12B

uming Project

uming Projec

en replaced bas a large pae based on

on

necting Commun

ersection

C

$

$ 1

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ 1

$

$

$ 1

t 12A): $ 5

t 12B): $ 5

by roundabouart of this promaterials an

Ap

nities

Cost Estimate

8,967,000

10,297,000

2,441,000

1,171,000

1,492,000

1,205,000

1,446,000

1,154,000

1,234,000

1,240,000

1,630,000

1,630,000

1,630,000

1,313,000

1,177,000

522,000

306,000

14,474,000

infeasible

418,000

1,519,000

12,614,000

57,583,000

58,913,000

ts oject cost wond design wo

ril 9, 2015

e3

ould ould

EvaluAddre

Thereand iHighwimprooften of‐wathey stime opera

The crequirdeemdiscusaligneprevio

The fo

x

x

x

x

x

A full An aeAppe

Bicy

The plisting


Feasibe are no designtersection iway 1 within ovements maresult in som

ay acquisitionslow traffic aland congestate.

creation of a red right‐of‐w

med to be polssed in the ped with Goldously been ru

ollowing desig

All design

While the intersectio(approximwith caref

The instalrequire inpresented guidance f

The Highwbecause of

Any left‐tuminimize t

listing of imperial view of tndix D.

ycle and



bility Congn feasibility improvementthe study ary carry with tme resistance n issues. Roulong previoustion during p

frontage roway acquisitlitically infeaspast includinden Gate Aveuled out based

gn considerat

consideration

installation oon, the intersately 130 feeul design con

lation of a tegration wiin the High

for how the ro

way 1/Main Sf the close pr

urn pockets fotheir impact o

provements wthe proposed

d Pedest


ternatives to

ncerns concerns thats. There area as it is nothem some obased on condabouts alssly non‐controperiods of h

ad parallel toion, includinsible. Other ag the Foothienue and exd on upcomin

tions were id

ns noted for A

of a roundabsection’s closeet) presents siderations.

roundabout th the Ethelhway 1 Safeoundabout sh

treet (S) inteoximity to th

or businesseson traffic ope

with feasibilit roundabout

rian Fac


39

at were identre no legal ot classified apposition froncerns over iso sometimesolled locationhigh demand

o Highway 1g the removalternative pill Boulevard xisting north‐ng projects an

entified:

Alternative 1

out is technice proximity ttraffic opera

at the Highwldore Street/ty and Mobhould be desi

ersection will e Higgins Can

s along SR‐92ration along S

y and design location with

cility Imp


Experts Conn

ified for any restrictions tas a rural areom local residnduced demas carry with tns, potentiallyor simply u

1 would also val of severaparallel routesalignment a

‐south connend environme

and Alternat

cally feasibleto the Main Sational challe

way 1/Etheld/Carlos Streebility Improveigned.

require an innyon Road/M

2 should haveSR‐92.

consideratioh required pa

proveme

s scores for t

necting Commun

of the Alternto increasingea. Some of ents. Capacitand as well athem resistay resulting in unfamiliarity

result in a lal existing hos with Highwand a paralleections, howeental impacts

ive 2

at the HighwStreet/9th Strenges that ca

dore Street et intersectioement Study

nnovative rouMain Street int

e adequate st

ons is includedaving footprin

ents

he evaluation

Ap

nities

native 3 roadwg capacity althe high impty improvemes resulting rignce due to hincreased trawith how t

large amountouses. This wway 1 have bel route partiever these hs.

way 1/9th Strreet intersectan be addres

intersection on. The concy provides go

undabout destersection.

torage length

d in Appendints is include

n metrics. A

ril 9, 2015

way ong pact ents ght‐how avel they

t of was een ially have

reet tion ssed

will cept ood

sign

s to

x B. d in

full

EvaluAddre

Table

#

18

19


Table

# I

C

2C S

13 G

14 M

15 S

16 K

17 S

Thereand ppedeswhile 1 wit


e 20 - Alter

Project

Pedestrian over/under crossings

Class II Bicycle

Route along SR 92


e 21 - Cost

Improvement

Carried over A

SR‐1 Sidewalk

Gray Whale C

Montara Sani

Surfer's Beach

Kehoe Avenu

SR‐92 Bike La

Feasibe are no feasipedestrian imstrian under‐cpedestrian ohout causing


native 3 Bic

Connectiv(0 to 3)

2

3


Estimates fo

t

Alternative 1

k (Phase C)

Cove Pedestri

itary District P

h Pedestrian

e Overcrossin

nes


mprovements crossings mayover‐crossingsg any conflict

ternatives to

cycle and Pe

vity Access(0 to 3

1

3


for Alternat

and 2 options

an Overcross

Pedestrian Ov

Overcrossing

ng

ncerns ns that were iother than ty be affecteds may providets or speed

40

edestrian Ev

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

1

1


tive 3 Bicycl

s

sing

vercrossing

g

identified forthose noted by the watere a way for preduction to

Experts Conn

valuation Sc

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

0


le and Pede

r any of the Afor Alternatir table for locedestrians ano highway 1

necting Commun

cores

e Precede(0 or 1

0

1


estrian Impr

C

$ 2

$

$

$

$

$

$ 2

Total: $ 7

Alternative 3 pve 2; howevcations close nd bicyclists ttraffic, the r

Ap

nities

ent 1)

ImpacSubtot

5

8


rovements

Cost Estimate

9,768,000

1,564,000

4,486,000

5,849,000

7,221,000

6,408,000

20,959,000

76,255,000

proposed bicyer the designto the coast to cross Highwrequired vert

ril 9, 2015

ct tal

dard ion, ded

e

ycle n of and way tical

EvaluAddre

clearaneede

A full

Tra

The plisting

Table

#

20

21

Cost SamT

# I

C

21 I

T

Therepropo

A full


ance and ramed for the str

listing of imp

nsit Imp


e 22 - Alter

Project

New SamTrans service

Transit to BART and San Mateo

Cost Esestimates forans Route 17

Improvement

Carried over A

Increased Sa

Total:

Feasibe are no feaosed transit im

listing of imp


mp for handicucture.

provements w

proveme


native 3 Tra

Connectiv(0 to 3)

3

3

stimatesr increased t7 and 294 ser

t

Alternative 1

amTrans serv

bility Consibility or demprovements

provements w

ternatives to

cap accessibi

with feasibility

ents


ansit Evalua

vity Access(0 to 3

3

3

s transit servicrvice.

and 2 options

vice to regio

ncerns esign concerns.

with feasibility

41

ility can pote

y and design c


ation Scores

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

0

0

ce are based

s

onal transit p

ns that were

y and design c

Experts Conn

entially result

consideration

s scores for t

s

Shoreline(0 or 1)

0

0

on current

providers

e identified f

consideration

necting Commun

t in a large f

ns is included

he evaluation

e Precede(0 or 1)

0

0

operating co

C

$ 1

$

$ 1

for any of th

ns is included

Ap

nities

footprint of l

d in Appendix

n metrics. A

nt )

ImpactSubtota

6

6

osts of week

Cost Estimate

2,537,000

2,124,000

14,661,000

he Alternativ

d in Appendix

ril 9, 2015

and

x B.

full

t al

kday

e

ve 3

x B.

EvaluAddre

Par

The plisting


rking Imp



proveme


ternatives to

ents


42


Experts Conn

s scores for t

necting Commun

he evaluation

Ap

nities

n metrics. A

ril 9, 2015

full

EvaluAddre

Table

#

21

22


Table

# I

C

5 C

6 E

Therepropo

A full


e 23 - Alter

Project

Carlos Street Parking

El Granada recreational parking


e 24 - Cost

Improvement

Carried over A

Carlos Street

El Granada Di

Feasibe are no feaosed parking

listing of imp


native 3 Par

Connectiv(0 to 3)

1

1


estimates fo

t

Alternative 1

On‐Street Pa

iagonal Parkin

bility Consibility or deimprovement

provements w

ternatives to

rking Evalua

vity Access(0 to 3

2

2


or Alternat

and 2 option

rking

ng

ncerns esign concernts other than

with feasibility

43

ation Score

s )

Safety(0 or 1)

1

1


ive 3 Parkin

s

ns that were those noted

y and design c

Experts Conn

es

Shoreline(0 or 1)

1

1


ng Improvem

e identified ffor Alternativ

consideration

necting Commun

e Precede(0 or 1

1

1


ments

C

$

$

$

Total: $

for any of thve 2.

ns is included

Ap

nities

ent 1)

ImpacSubtot

6

6


Cost Estimate

4,258,000

34,000

54,000

4,346,000

he Alternativ

d in Appendix

ril 9, 2015

ct tal

dard ion, ded

e

ve 3

x B.

EvaluAddre

The falterndeficiimpacoveraaltern

x

x

x

The im

x

x

Whilefor agaltern

Hyb

The fo

x

x


following threnatives were encies in thect to existingall effect on rnatives descri

Alternative

Alternative

Alternative

mprovements

Roadway a

o M

o M

o Im

Pedestrian

o Fil

o Im

o Im

o Im

o Su

e the determiggregation annative which i

brid Alte

Roadwollowing proje

Addition oimprove ciin a cost‐e

Addition ocirculation


ee alternativdesigned to e Buildout cog infrastructuresidents of tbed in this se

e 1 – Low Cos

e 2 – Medium

e 3 – High Co

s for each alte

and Intersect

eeting roadw

eeting interse

mproving veh

n, Bicycle, Tra

ling gaps in e

mproving pede

mproving acce

mproving acce

upport for a p

nation of altend evaluationincludes sugg

ernative

way and ects are sugg

of a left‐turn birculation andffective way

of a median wn in Montara a

ternatives to

es were devassess whatondition. Thure, the envithe Midcoastection are as f

st/Low Impac

m Cost/Mediu

st/High Impa

ernative were

ion Improvem

way segment L

ection LOS sta

icle and pede

nsit, and Park

existing bicycl

estrian and bi

ess to commu

ess to the sho

roject in a pr

ernatives basn of improvegested improv

with Su

d Intersecested to impr

bay and an acd prevent turn(Alt 1)

with northbouand provide a

44

veloped fromt level of imphe three alteronment andt Communitiefollows:

ct

um Impact

ct

e evaluated b

ments

LOS standard

andards

estrian safety

king Improve

e or pedestri

icycle safety

nities, neighb

reline

evious study

ed on cost anments, the uvements from

uggested

ction Imrove safety o

cceleration laning vehicles

nd left‐turn ba crossing ref

Experts Conn

COm a list of prprovement wernatives wed the surroues and City o

based on the f

s

ements

an networks

borhoods or p

nd impact proultimate resum all three alt

d Improv

mprovemr circulation i

ne at Gray Wfrom restrict

bay at 16th Strfuge for pede

necting Commun

ONCLUoposed imprwould be neeere based onnding commof Half Moon

following crit

or transit con

popular desti

ovides a clearult of this stuernatives.

vements

ments in a cost‐effe

Whale Cove pating flow alon

reet will imprstrians (Alt 2

Ap

nities

USIONrovements. eded to addrn cost; expecunities; and n Bay. The th

teria:

nnections

nations

r methodologudy is a hybr

s

ctive way: arking lot will ng Highway 1

rove )

ril 9, 2015

N The ress cted the

hree

gy id

EvaluAddre

x

x

x

x

x

The fo

x


The use ofintersectiointersectioHighway 1The propowithout an

The implemspeed humcost‐effect3)

Stop signs paved shocross sectibicycle act

o M

o M

o El

o Ha(A

Consolidatof vehicle

o Nu

o Grpla

Left‐turn laeffective sThe main ilocations.

o Beo Leo Ha

ollowing proje

Signalizationo improv

o Hi


f signage to reons within theon LOS deficie1 and potentiased constructny added ben

mentation of mps along Mative way to sl

added to unsulder for the on for vehicletivity along Hi

ontara Segme

oss Beach Seg

Granada Seg

alf Moon Bay Alt 1, 2)

tion of accessconflicts alon

urseryman’s E

rand Avenue anned improv

anes at majorolution to adimpediment wThe following

erta’s Farm mos Farm alf Moon Bay

ects are sugg

on of the folloement with i

ghway 1 and

ternatives to

estrict turninge Midcoast arency, but it wally improve stion of mediaefit. (Alt 1)

traffic calminain Street in Mow traffic and

signed intersefollowing sege and pedestrighway 1:

ent – 1st Stre

gment – Carlo

ment – Coral

Segment – F

s to Highway ng Highway 1

Exchange driv

and Terrace Avement by th

r businesses adress a circulwould be acqg locations ar

Nursery

ested to impr

owing intersemplementati

California Av

45

g movementsrea and Half Mill reduce thesafety for pedans and block

ng improvemMontara and ad improve saf

ections alonggments alongrian safety ba

eet and 14th S

os Street to E

Reef Avenue

renchman's C

1 at the followand improve

veways betwe

Avenue (Alreahe City of Half

along SR 92 inlation issue couisition of thre suggested (

rove intersec

ections will adon of a round

venue in Moss

Experts Conn

s and to consMoon Bay wile number of vdestrians in Mking access is

ents such as along Carlos Sfety for bicyc

g Highway 1 ag Highway 1 wased on areas

Street (Alt 1,

Etheldore Stre

e to Medio Ro

Creek Road to

wing locatione circulation (A

een Mirada R

ady included f Moon Bay)

n Half Moon ommonly idee required rig(Alt 3):

ction and road

ddress the LOdabout (Alt 2

s Beach (LOS

necting Commun

olidate trafficll not addressvehicle conflicMontara and Ma more expen

speed displayStreet in Mosclists and ped

nd a defined will provide a s of highest p

2, 3)

eet (S) (Alt 1,

oad (Alt 1, 2)

o Redondo Be

ns will reduceAlt 2):

Road and You

in Buildout a

Bay would beentified by theght‐of‐way at

dway deficien

OS deficiencie):

F to LOS B)

Ap

nities

c at key s any cts along Moss Beach. nsive solution

y units and ss Beach is a estrians. (Alt

curb and consistent edestrian and

2, 3)

each Road

e the number

ng Avenue

nalysis as a

e a cost‐e communityt the desired

ncies:

es and show

ril 9, 2015

n

d

.

EvaluAddre

x

x

x

Manyimproand Scondithrouare coimprosuggerelaxecomm

4 From


o Hi

o HianBa

o HiincCit

Roundabo

o Hi

o Hi

o SRAM

The remaiintersectio

Increasing and St. EthMoss Beacdeficiency cost and o

The additioLandfill Roon this roacost estimearthwork

y of the intersovements. ThR 92 and fairtions. This regh the use ofonsidered undovements andested that theed to take intmunity. Altern

m Buildout Ana


ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and nalysis as an inay) (LOS E to L

ghway 1 and cluded in Builty of Half Mo

uts at the fol

ghway 1 and

ghway 1 and

R 92 and SR 35M and PM pe

nder of the roon.

road capacitheldore Streech and Capist(LOS E to LOSbtaining pub

on of passingoad and Pilarcadway segmeate does not k which may b

section and rois was the resly strict LOS sesults in LOS df signalizationdesirable fromd signalizatione intersectiono account thenatively, land

alysis and Traf

ternatives to

Cypress Aven

Main Street ntersection pLOS A)4

Grand Bouleldout analysison Bay) (LOS

lowing inters

Coronado St

Kehoe Avenu

5 east of Halfak improve fr

oundabouts a

y to two lanet/Vallemar Strano Road (SS A/B), howevlic support. (A

g/climbing lancitos Quarry Rnt and providhowever inclbe identified w

oadway LOS dsult of very hstandards thadeficiencies inn or roundabom a multimodn would furth and roadwaye current defid‐use alternat

ffic Projections

46

nue in Moss B

(S) in Half Moplanned to be

vard/Terraces as an interseF to LOS B)4

ections addre

reet in El Gra

ue in Half Mo

f Moon Bay (Mrom LOS F to

analyzed resu

es in each diretreet in Moss) in El Granadver the largesAlt 3)

nes on the easRoad will allowde a passing llude any rightwith a full des

deficiencies aigh forecastet in many casn locations thouts or in locadal or politicaher address thy level of serviciencies and tives that wou

s Report

Experts Conn

Beach (LOS F

oon Bay (Alre signalized by

e Avenue in Hection planne

ess LOS defic

nada (LOS E t

oon Bay (LOS

Midday peak LOS E)

ulted in a wor

ection betwees Beach, and bda will addresst impedimen

stbound portw cars to pasane to go arot‐of‐way acqusign. (Alt 3)

re not addresd buildout voses are not mhat either couations where al standpoint.he LOS deficievice standardthe multimould significant

necting Commun

to LOS C)

eady includedy the City of H

alf Moon Bayed to be signa

iencies (Alt 3

to LOS D)

F to LOS C)

remains LOS

rsening of LOS

en 9th Street between Cypss the roadwant to this will

tion of SR‐92 s the high voound right‐turuisition or an

ssed with theolumes along met under curruld not be mitcapacity imp. While large‐encies, it is inds for the Midodal needs of tly reduce the

Ap

nities

in Buildout Half Moon

y (Already alized by the

):

F, however

S for the

in Montara ress Avenue iay segment be the large

between the lume of truckrning cars. Thy large scale

e proposed Highway 1 rent tigated provements ‐scale capacitstead dcoast area bethe e Buildout

ril 9, 2015

in

ks he

y

e

EvaluAddre

land upropo

Table

#

4

4

4

The foprovid


use could parosed hybrid a

e 25 - Cost

Improve

1 Gray Wh

2 Turn Res

3 SR‐1 Sid

4A SR‐1 Pav

4B SR‐1 Pav

4C SR‐1 Pav

5 Californ

6 Cypress

8 Main Str

11 Montara

12 Nursery

14 Terrace

19 Coronad

21 Kehoe A

26 SR‐92/S

27 Main Str

28 Carlos St

31 SR‐92 Le

32 SR‐92 Pa

33 SR‐1 Wid

Bicycleollowing bicycding a safer a


tially addresslternative roa

of Hybrid A

ement

hale Cove Tur

striction Signa

e‐Street Stop

ved Shoulder

ved Shoulder

ved Shoulder

ia Avenue Sig

Avenue Signa

reet (S) Signa

a Lighthouse

men's Exchan

Avenue/Gran

do Street Rou

Avenue Round

R‐35 Rounda

reet Traffic Ca

treet Traffic C

eft Turn Lanes

assing/Climbi

dening to 4 La

e and Pecle and pedesnd more con

ternatives to

s the forecastadway and in

Alternative R

rn and Accele

age

p Signs

and Curb (Ph

and Curb (Ph

and Curb (Ph

gnal

al

l

Median and L

nge Access Co

nd Boulevard

ndabout

dabout

bout

alming

Calming

s

ng Lanes

anes

H

edestrianstrian improvnected enviro

47

ted deficiencitersection im

Roadway an

eration Lanes

hase A)

hase B)

hase C)

Left Turn Bay

onsolidation (

Access Conso

Hybrid Roadw

n Facilityvements wereonment to th

Experts Conn

es. A summamprovements

nd Intersect

y

(Expanded Al

olidation and

way and Inter

y Improe found to behe Midcoast a

necting Commun

ry of the costis included in

tion Improv

ternative)

d Signalization

rsection Tota

vementse cost‐effectivarea and Half

Ap

nities

t of the n Table 25.

vements

Cost Estim

$ 440

$ 40

$ 18

$ 2,302

$ 2,841

$ 820

$ 767

$ 640

$ 530

$ 170

$ 2,851

n $ 1,270

$ 1,154

$ 1,240

$ 1,177

$ 522

$ 306

$ 418

$ 1,519

$ 12,614

al $ 31,639

s ve solutions toMoon Bay.

ril 9, 2015

mate

0,000

0,000

8,000

,000

,000

0,000

7,000

0,000

0,000

0,000

,000

,000

,000

,000

,000

2,000

6,000

8,000

,000

4,000

9,000

o

EvaluAddre

x

x

x

x

The foenviroare su

x

x


The “Paral(including pedestrianSharrows oHalf Moonbicycles awA Class II bHighway 1Striped croconnectivilocations (

o Gro Mo 2n

o 7th

o Mo Vio Cao Cyo HMo Noo Suo Mo Mo Keo Teo Quo Pilo SR

ollowing impronment to thuggested if th

A Class II bbetween Snecessary who wouldTraffic signin the dow

o Peo Cr


lel Trail” adjaAirport Streens and recreaton Main Streen Bay provide way from the bike lane alon1 (Alt 2) ossing with bety, access, an(Alt 1): ray Whale Covontara State d Street h Street oss Beach Ligrginia Street alifornia Streeypress AvenueMB Airport orth Capistranurfer’s Beach edio Avenue irada Road ehoe Avenue errace Avenueuarry Road (alarcitos CreekR 35 (along SR

rovements we Midcoast ahe funding is abicycle lane alSan Mateo anto perform ad use the rounal updates thwntown areasedestrian couosswalk signa

ternatives to

acent to Highwet) provides a tional bicycleet in Montaraa safe and coheavier traff

ng Capistrano

eacons were nd safety. The

ve Beach

ghthouse (16t

et e

no Road Parking area,

e/Grand Boullong SR 92) k Road (alongR 92)

ere identifiedrea and Half available. long SR‐92 wod Half Moon demand studte would makhroughout Ha. Potential imnt‐down indial crossing ad

48

way 1 and Cosafe and cos

es away from a, Carlos Streeost‐effective afic on HighwaRoad would

found to be ve following loc

h Street)

, north of Cor

evard

g SR 92)

d solutions toMoon Bay, bu

ould greatly iBay, howevedy to determke it worth thalf Moon Bay mprovements cators on all sdjustments to

Experts Conn

oastal Trail adt‐effective altthe heavier tet in Moss Bealternative roy 1 (Alt 1). improve bicy

very cost‐effecations were

ronado Street

o providing a sut they carrie

mprove conner the large coine if the pothe cost (Alt 3) would improinclude (Alt 1signalized croo accommoda

necting Commun

djacent to theternative routraffic on Higheach, and Maoute for comm

ycle connecti

ective at impridentified as

t

safer and moed a larger pr

nectivity for bost would matential volume). ove safety for1): osswalks ate slower wa

Ap

nities

e coastline ute for hway 1 (Alt 2in Street in muting

vity along

roving high priority

re connectedice tag. They

bicyclists ake it e of bicyclists

r pedestrians

alking speeds

ril 9, 2015

)

d

s

EvaluAddre

x

x

Thougof ovecheapaltern

Table

Pro

Hybri

Hybri


o Bico Pe

A Class II bbicyclists, of bicyclistSidewalks pedestrian

o AloHa

o Alo

gh they minimer‐ or under‐cper solution onative roadwa

e 26 - Cost

oject #

d Bicycle and

1 Str

3 Sh

4 Sh

6 Pa

7 Co

10 Ma

11 Ca

d Bicycle and

2A SR

2B SR

2C SR

5 Co

9 Tra

12 Air

17 SR


cycle signal dedestrian refubike lane alonhowever givets would helpin the followns (Alt 1, 2, 3)ong Highway alf Moon Bay ong Coronado

mize the confcrossings as wof striped peday and interse

of Hybrid A

d Pedestrian

riped Pedestr

arrows on Ma

arrows on Ca

rallel Trail adj

astal Trail thr

ain Street Cla

pistrano Road

d Pedestrian

‐1 Sidewalk (

‐1 Sidewalk (

‐1 Sidewalk (

ronado Stree

affic Signal Up

rport Street C

‐92 Bike Lane

ternatives to

etection deviuge spaces onng Airport Streen the cost, a p determine ting locations ): 1 in Montara

o Street and A

lict and impawell as the lardestrian crossection improv

Alternative B

Facility Recom

rian Crossing w

ain Street

arlos Street

jacent to Hig

roughout the

ss III Bike Rou

d Bicycle Faci

Hybrid B

Facility Recom

Phase A)

Phase B)

Phase C)

et and Ave Alh

pdates

Class II Bike La

es

49

ice n wide road creet would prodemand studhe need for awould provid

a, Moss Beach

Avenue Alham

ct with vehicrge footprint ings. A summvements is in

Bicycle and

Project Nam

mmended Im

with Beacons

hway 1 for th

entire study

ute

ilities

Bicycle and Pe

mmended Im

hambra Sidew

anes

Experts Conn

rossings ovide anothedy to determian additional de a more con

h, Miramar, a

mbra in El Gr

le along Highis prohibitive

mary of the cocluded in Tab

Pedestrian

me

mprovements

s

he entire stud

area

edestrian Rec

mprovements

walk

necting Commun

r alternate roine if the potbicycle routentinuous walk

and develope

anada

way 1, the vee as comparedost of the proble 26.

Improvem

s

dy area

commended

s with Additio

Ap

nities

oute for ential volumee (Alt 2) king path for

ed areas of

ery high cost d to the muchposed hybrid

ments

$

$

$

$ 1

$

$

$

Total: $ 1

onal Funding

$

$

$

$

$

$ 4

$ 2

ril 9, 2015

e

h d

Cost

2,550,000

44,000

43,000

1,037,000

5,251,000

85,000

866,000

9,876,000

1,475,000

1,806,000

1,564,000

749,000

1,624,000

4,238,000

0,959,000

EvaluAddre

The mSamTcompvariet

Transx x

x

Transx

x

Givenimprowhichthis hinclud

A sumimproservic

Table

#

Hybri

2

Hybri

1


Transimajority of trans or privaprehensive recty of services

it services thaShuttle buMore freqarea. (Alt 2The establ

it services thaSamTrans morning afrequency School busvehicles an

n the high cosovements shoh transit stopsybrid alternaded as being i

mmary of the ovements is ince for Cabrillo

27 ‐ Cost of Hy

Improvemen

d Transit Fac

Increased W

d Transit Rec

Bus Stop Am


Hybr

it Improvthe transit imate bus compcommendatiolisted here.

at were evalus service on suent weeken2) ishment of a

at were evaluservice that pnd evening pof Samtrans s service for Cnd maintenan

t but necessitould be baseds have the higtive, a conserimproved.

cost of the prncluded in Tao Unified Scho

ybrid Alternati

nt

cility Recomm

Weekend Sa

commended

menities

ternatives to

rid Bicycle an

vementsmprovementspanies as weon will requir

uated to havesummer and fd service for

park‐and‐rid

uated to haveprovides conneak periods wRoute 294 anCabrillo Unifience. (Alt 2)

ty of improved on a travel dghest demandrvative estima

roposed hybrble 27. This cool District.

ive Transit Imp

mended Impro

mtrans serv

Hybr

Improvemen

50

d Pedestrian

s s will depenell as requiredre a demand s

e the highest cfall weekendsthe existing S

e shuttle and

e less cost effenections to rewith limited snd 17. (Alt 3)ed School Dist

ements to busdemand studyd or highest pate of about

rid alternativecost estimate

provements

ovements

ice

rid Parking Re

nts with Addit

Experts Conn

n with Additio

nd on discussd acquisitionstudy to dete

cost effectives during specSamTrans fixe

d usage of exi

ectiveness weegional transistops though

trict including

s stops, the sy with public potential for fhalf the stops

e roadway an does not inc

ecommended

tional Fundin

necting Commun

onal Funding

sions and nen and ongoinermine need a

eness were: cial events. (Aed routes serv

sting parking

ere: it providers dincreased we

g a facility for

pecific locatioinvolvement future demans (40 stops) h

nd intersectiolude the cost

C

$

d Total $

ng

$

Ap

nities

Total: $ 5

egotiations wg costs. A mand want for

Alt 1) ving the stud

lots. (Alt 2)

uring the eekday

r storing the

ons chosen foto determinend. (Alt 1) Forhave been

on t of school bu

Cost Estimate

525,000

525,000

6,240,000

ril 9, 2015

2,291,000

with more the

y

or e r

us

e

EvaluAddre

21

The laspillovMidco

x

x

x

The fomake

x x

Table

Pro

Hybri

Hybri


Increased S

Parkinack of capacitver of demanoast and Half

FormalizedHighway 1Diagonal pare both pneed, thatMoss BeacImproved

ollowing loca their approv

Paving andParking lotHighway 1

28 ‐ Cost of Hy

oject #

d Parking Re

1 Mo

3 Wa

5 Ca

6 El G

d Parking Re

2 Up

4 Ra


SamTrans se

H

ng Improty for the largnd into commMoon Bay. T

d parallel par1. (Alt 2) parking for Mopart of larger it they be consch and El Granwayfinding si

ations would val dependent

d striping at tt for Rancho C1 (Alt 2)

ybrid Alternati

commended

ontara State B

ayfinding

rlos Street On

Granada Diag

commended

pper Gray Wh

ncho Corral d

ternatives to

rvice to regi

Hybrid Trans

ovementge amount of unity parkingThe following

king for Mont

oss Beach aloimprovementstructed indenada. (Alt 3)ignage (Alt 1)

also benefit t on available

he upper GraCorral de Tier

ive Parking Im

Improvemen

Beach Parking

n‐Street Park

gonal Parking

Improvemen

hale Cove Park

de Tierra Park

H

51

onal transit

it with Addit

ts weekend recg. There is a nproposed im

tara State Be

ong Carlos Strts, however itpendent of th

)

from increase funding:

ay Whale Coverra access and

mprovements

Project Nam

nts

g Lot Improve

ing

Hybri

nts with Addi

king Lot Impr

king Lot

ybrid Parking

Experts Conn

providers

ional Funding

creational parneed for additprovements

each, with a p

reet and diagot is suggestedhe approval o

ed parking; h

e parking lotd beach overf

me

ements

id Parking Re

itional Fundin

rovements

g with Additi

necting Commun

$

g Total $

rking demandtional parkingpresent low c

hysical separ

onal parking d that given tof the larger p

however the

(Alt 1) flow located

ecommended

ng

onal Funding

Ap

nities

2,124,000

8,889,000

d results in a g in the cost solutions

ration from

for El Granadhe parking projects in

higher cost m

east of

$

$

$

$

d Total $

$

$

g Total $ 4

ril 9, 2015

s.

da

may

Cost

557,000

303,000

34,000

54,000

948,000

1,052,000

2,346,000

4,346,000

co e - smcgov.org...by 1970 oak (510 in as april broadway, land, ca 946) 763‐2061 sociation wit 9,...

Documents