CNRMC PSSRA Brief

Mr. Kevin TaylorMay 19, 2016

“Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship maintenance periods- It does not constitute any request for information or request for proposals or any commitment to contract for work in accordance with this plan. This information is to assist U.S. DoD industry contractors by providing a broad overview of frequently changing (driven by U.S. Navy operations) maintenance schedules and is not a guarantee of workload or exact ship schedules”

“Distribution Statement D: Distribution to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (administrative use)(25 Feb 15). Other requests shall be referred to Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center”

Pre-Decisional

BSO 24

BSO 60/70

SEA 21I Inactive Ships

DIRECTOR

PMS 443 In-Service Readiness

and Sustainment

PM: CAPT

PMS 326 International Fleet

Support

PM: CAPT

PMS 407 Surface Ship Modernization

PM: CAPT

SURFMEPP

CO: CAPT

SEA 21P Chief Financial Officer

PMS 339 Surface Training

Systems

PM: CAPT

SEA 21D Director, Contract

Mgmt. Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard and Intermediate

Maintenance Facility (NWRMC)

CO: CAPT

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate

Maintenance Facility (HRMC)

CO: CAPT Southeast Regional

Maintenance Center (SERMC)

CO: CAPT

Southwest Regional Maintenance Center

(SWRMC)

CO: CAPT

SURFACE WARFARE DIRECTORATE (WNY)

(SES) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

DEPUTY COMMANDER FOR SURFACE

WARFARE COMMANDER, NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE

CENTER

NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER (NOR)

(SES) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

NRMC Code 200 Engineering

NRMC Code 300 Waterfront Operations

NRMC Code 900 Intermediate Level

Maintenance

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center

(MARMC)

CO: CAPT

Forward Deployed Regional Maintenance

Center (FDRMC)

CO: CAPT

NRMC Code 1200 (400, 600, 700)

Corporate Operations

SEA21 / CNRMC

Maintenance & Modernization Advanced Planning, Planning &

Execution Process

Effective Management Focused On

Seamless Transition

Through the Process

Effective Management Focused On

Seamless Transition

Through the Process

2

SEA 21 & CNRMC Alignment

Navy Regional Maintenance Centers

3

Workload Drivers:

Private Sector Contract Management and Oversight (CMO)Fleet Technical Support/Assist (FTS/FTA) & Material Assessments (TSRA)Surface Ship Intermediate-Level (I-Level) MaintenanceRegional Maintenance Center (RMC) Program Management and OperationsForward Deployed Maintenance Response and Execution

RMC Management and Business Operations• ISIC of Global Enterprise with 4 RMCs + 2 Dets; 2 NSY embedded

RMCs ADDU; & collaborative FDNF (SRF).• $308M/year Fleet Funded Maintainers (2630 FTE).• Validated RMC resourcing models (CPs, WARR).• Lead implementation of the Fleet Review Panel (“Balisle Report”)

Findings and Recommendations.• Standardize business processes, training and Project Team

development, workload forecasting, and maintenance IT systems across RMC Enterprise.

Private Sector Oversight• 50+ CNO surface ship avails/year, combat

system & C4I mod, CVN top-side work, emergent maintenance for all platforms.

• Manage >300/year CMAVs, WOOs, VRAVs to increase global Fleet readiness.

• $2.7B Fleet / SYSCOM annual contracting.• Implement National Contract Strategy.• Track and report Availabilities to TYCOM, Fleet,

NAVSEA and OPNAV.• Quality Management, process oversight/

improvement, and Availability Certification.

Forward Deployed Maintenance Management• “First responder” oversight to 5th and 6th Fleet on all

platforms – Surface, CVN, SSN/SSGN.• Maintenance Provider in Rota (4 BMD DDGs) and Bahrain

(14 MCMs/PCs).• Voyage maintenance / emergent repairs in 5th / 6th Fleet AORs• Coordinate technical surge support to SRF Yokosuka.• Oversee Fly-away Team and contracted maintenance to

Deployed LCS.

Tech Assist and Assessments• “Find, Fix, Train”- provide worldwide Distance

Support and CASREP FTA.• SMEs for INSURV and Fleet Introduction. • Total Ship Readiness Assessment Program

(TSRA) in support of ship ESL.

Re-Establish Surface I-level• NAMTS program meets ship NEC requirements • Update NECs to match Fleet needs with organic assets• Training Sailors to increase ship self sufficiency.• Execute 300K MDs/year surface maintenance.• Ship support through Maintenance Assist Teams (MATs),

HM&E and CS “Family of Products”.

Data Date – 2015-10-13

Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC) (Norfolk-Based)

3 Military, 48 CIVPERs, 20 KTRsCurrent RMC Enterprise (CONUS/OCONUS)

2,450 Military, 3020 CIVPERs, 960 KTRs

Det Rota

NWRMC

SWRMC

HRMC

MARMC

Det Bahrain

JRMCFDRMC

SERMC

TSRA Trends FY12 thru FY15

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O

RPD

RMC Total Private Sector Workload(including MOD estimates (no AIT)

MARMC SWRMC SERMC NWRMC HRMC FDRMC (Bahrain) FDRMC (ROTA)

FOUO

Business Sensitive - FOUO

Report: ST1Data Date: 04/07/2016

FY-16 FY-17 FY-18 FY-19

Total FY Mandays

Average FY RPDs

3,207,896

12,802

3,102,001

12,437

3,771,286

15,024

3,881,806

15,474

4

Availability Execution and Performance Execution of Maintenance and Modernization Availabilities Workload Management

o Focus on completing avails on time in support of OFRP Continue to drive a culture of process compliance with and improvements to the End to End Maintenance and

Modernization process. o Surface Team One management of the Maintenance and Modernization Campaign Plan

Fleet Sustainment Use the Life Cycle Management Group (LCMG) to prioritize and approve ship class POM investments

o Managing change, common specs and installation across programs. o Proactively engaging the new construction and in-service communities to identify, assess, and resolve issues.

Surface Ship Contracting Strategy Implementation and execution of the surface ship contracting strategy

o Three 3rd Party Planning Contracts Awarded to QED; o Execution contracts phased across ports: Norfolk (2015), Mayport (2015), San Diego (2016), Pacific Northwest

(2016), Pearl Harbor (2020).

CG and LSD Modernization Execution In FY15, USS COWPENS (CG 63), USS GETTYSBURG (CG 64) and USS TORTUGA (LSD 46) were inducted. In FY16, USS COWPENS (CG 63) and USS GETTYSBURG (CG 64) will begin their SSRAs. USS CHOSIN (CG 65) and

USS VICKSBURG (CG 69) will be inducted.

LCS Sustainment & Maintenance Work with PEO LCS to further develop the implementation and execution of LCS life cycle sustainment strategy. CNO Avails in execution in San Diego; will support FSST avails in Mayport in FY16; planned maintenance avails in FY17.

Core Tenets

Surface FAST Process

• Objective: Develop executable availability schedules to improve port loading for the nine surface ship Regional Maintenance Centers (FDRMC, HRMC, MARMC, SERMC, SWRMC, NWRMC, SRF/JRMC) so that lost operational days (LOD) are minimized.

• Conducted twice per year during POM and DON budget cycles with formal outbrief to the Fleet Maintenance Board of Directors. Workload is constantly monitored in the interim given the dynamic nature of operations.

• Considerations: Global Force Management, Optimized Fleet Response Plan, Port Capacity (Private Sector; RMC Contract Management Oversight), Dry Dock Availability, Maintenance Requirements, Modernization Requirements, Contract Type.

5

“Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship maintenance periods- It does not constitute any request for information or request for proposals or any commitment to contract for work in accordance with this plan. This information is to assist U.S. DoD industry contractors by providing a broad overview of frequently changing (driven by U.S. Navy operations) maintenance schedules and is not a guarantee of workload or exact ship schedules”

“Distribution Statement D: Distribution to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (administrative use)(25 Feb 15). Other requests shall be referred to Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center”

NWRMC Private Sector Workload Forecast with MOD estimates (no AIT) FY16-FY19

Industry Forecast - Current Baseline as of 10 March 2016

6

“Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship maintenance periods- It does not constitute any request for information or request for proposals or any commitment to contract for work in accordance with this plan. This information is to assist U.S. DoD industry contractors by providing a broad overview of frequently changing (driven by U.S. Navy operations) maintenance schedules and is not a guarantee of workload or exact ship schedules”

“Distribution Statement D: Distribution to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (administrative use)(25 Feb 15). Other requests shall be referred to Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Command”

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O

ResourcesP

er Day

NWRMC  Private SectorWorkload Forecast Estimate with MOD (no AIT) FY16‐FY19

Interim Baseline as of 10 March 2016Industry Forecast

FOUOReport: IndustryDate: 03/10/16

“Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship maintenance periods‐It does not constitute any request for information or request for proposals or any commitment to contract for work in accordance with this plan. This information is to assist U.S. DoD industry contractors by providing a broad overview of frequently changing (driven by U.S. Navy operations) maintenance schedules and is not a guarantee of workload or exact ship schedules”“Distribution Statement D: Distribution to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (administrative use)(25 Feb 15). Other requests shall be referred to Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Command” 

FY-16

Business Sensitive - FOUO

Total TYCOM, CM & MODFY Mandays

Average TYCOM, CM & MODFY Mandays

218,442

883

FY-17 FY-18 FY-19

301,058

1,207

365,598

1,442

279,317

1,102

Workload Color Legend CM DDG CVN FFG

7

NWRMC Private Sector Workload Forecast with MOD estimates (no AIT) FY20-FY23

Industry Forecast - Current Baseline as of 10 March 2016

“Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship maintenance periods- It does not constitute any request for information or request for proposals or any commitment to contract for work in accordance with this plan. This information is to assist U.S. DoD industry contractors by providing a broad overview of frequently changing (driven by U.S. Navy operations) maintenance schedules and is not a guarantee of workload or exact ship schedules”

“Distribution Statement D: Distribution to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (administrative use)(25 Feb 15). Other requests shall be referred to Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center”

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O

ResourcesP

er Day

NWRMC Private SectorWorkload Forecast Estimate with MOD (no AIT) FY20‐FY23

Interim Baseline as of 10 March 2016Industry Forecast

FOUOReport: IndustryDate: 03/10/16

“Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship maintenance periods‐ It does not constitute any request for information or request for proposals or any commitment to contract for work in accordance with this plan. This information is to assist U.S. DoD industry contractors by providing a broad overview of frequently changing (driven by U.S. Navy operations) maintenance schedules and is not a guarantee of workload or exact ship schedules”“Distribution Statement D: Distribution to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (administrative use)(25 Feb 15). Other requests shall be referred to Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Command” 

FY-20

Business Sensitive - FOUO

Total TYCOM, CM & MODFY Mandays

Average TYCOM, CM & MODFY Mandays

325,689

1,297

FY-21 FY-22 FY-23

204,963

799

327,666

1,323

178,870

725

Workload Color Legend CM DDG CVN FFG

Way Forward

• Release updated workload forecasts to industry – intent is quarterly

• Sustain meaningful ongoing dialogue (two-way) with industry to insure communications are accurate and understood

• On-time completion of projects is critical to meet demanding fleet operations

• Prepare for coast-wide bid projects – CG/LSD Modernization, DDG DMPs, large amphibious ships