cloud-radiation interaction as simulated by the canadian gem model compared to arm observations
DESCRIPTION
Cloud-radiation interaction as simulated by the Canadian GEM model compared to ARM observations. Danahé Paquin-Ricard Director : Colin Jones Codirector: Paul Vaillancourt. Source:http://www.cs.pitt.edu/. 1. Motivation. Cloud-Radiation Interaction. Microphysics. Macro. Environment. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Cloud-radiation interaction as simulated by the
Canadian GEM model compared to ARM
observations
Danahé Paquin-RicardDirector: Colin Jones
Codirector: Paul Vaillancourt
Source:http://www.cs.pitt.edu/
1. Motivation
MacroMicrophysics Environment
Cloud-RadiationInteraction
Surface Radiative Budget
Precipitation
2. GEM-LAM v.3.2.2
Diagnostic variables:
Cloud fractionLWC, IWC
rei, rel
Parameterization:Cloud fraction f(RH)& vertical overlap
Liquid-ice separation& effective radii f(T)
Radiation:Correlated-K
Prognostic variables :T, qv, qc, qs, qr
Shallow convection:Kuo-Transient
Deep convection:Kain-Fritsch
Advection
Microphysics:Sundqvist
3. Simulations
Simulations: 53 vertical levels Horizontal resolution:
0,5° Time step: 30 min Prescribed SSTs & ice
fraction LBCs: ERA40 & ECMWF 7/8 years: 1998-
2004/05Source: Ayrton Zadra & Paul Vaillancourt
Source: http://www.arm.gov
NSA
SGP
4. ObservationsARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program) SGP (Southern Great Plains) NSA (North Slope of Alaska)
Observations: SWD and LWD LWP and IWV Cloud fraction Precipitation Surface T & p
5. Results
3 hourly-mean (except for precip.: 3 hourly accumulation)
Radiation fluxes: function of cloud fraction Clear-sky: CF<10% Overcast: CF>90% All-sky
LWP & IWV: only when precipitation ≤ 0,25mm/3h
5. Cloud fraction, IWV & LWP
5. Cloud fraction, IWV & LWP
5. Cloud fraction, IWV & LWP
5. SWD vs. IWV: clear sky (≤10 %)
5. SWD vs. IWV: clear sky (≤10 %)
C
Local Time (h)
5. LWD vs. IWV: clear sky (≤10
%)
5. LWD vs. IWV: clear sky (≤10
%)
5. SWD vs. LWP: overcast (≥90%)
5. SWD vs. LWP: overcast (≥90%)
Local Time (h)
5. LWD vs. LWP: overcast (≥90%)
5. LWD vs. LWP: overcast (≥90%)
5. SWD
+ CF underestimated
5. LWD
+ CF underestimated
6. Conclusion
Cloud-radiation interaction can modify surface radiative fluxes by different ways
Verification of individual components is important
Thank you for your Thank you for your attention…attention…
Questions ?Questions ?
6. A feedback example
Drier Surface
Less evaporation
Overestimate nearsurf. Temperature
UnderestimateCloud fraction
OverestimateSWD
UnderestimateIWV
5. Résultats
D
5. LWP