clinical case study: short bowel syndrome
DESCRIPTION
Clinical Case Study: Short Bowel Syndrome. Amy Lofley Clinical Update. Objectives. Case Study Medical Hx Nutrition Assessment Nutrition Intervention Prognosis Conclusion. Overview of Short Bowel Syndrome Terminology Physiology Pathophysiology Treatment Medication Recommendations - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Amy Lofl eyClinical Update
CLINICAL CASE STUDY: SHORT BOWEL
SYNDROME
Overview of Short Bowel Syndrome TerminologyPhysiologyPathophysiologyTreatmentMedicationRecommendations
Multidisciplinary team
Case StudyMedical HxNutrition Assessment
Nutrition Intervention
Prognosis Conclusion
OBJECTIVES
Clinical Update
SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME
Short bowel syndrome (SBS): “inadequate functional bowel to support nutrient and fluid requirements for that individual, regardless of the length of the GI tract in the setting of normal fluid and nutrient intake”[1].
Ileocecal valve: valve at the end of the ileum that allows transit of small intestine contents into the large intestine.
Intestinal adaptation: “a growth process of the remaining small bowel through morphological and functional changes, leading to improved absorption”[2].
Dumping syndrome: rapid emptying of the stomach into the small bowel especially when simple carbohydrates are consumed
TERMINOLOGY [1,2]
NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY [4,5]
The small intestine is the site of nutrient absorption. Normal length of a small intestine varies between 300 to
800 cm in an adult and 250 cm in a term baby. On average it absorbs 150-300 g monosaccharides, 60-100
g fatty acids, 60-120 g amino acids and peptides and 50-100 g ions.
Most absorption occurs in the ileum. The first 100-150 cm of jejunum is where carbohydrates,
nitrogen and fat are absorbed.
The large intestine is the site at which water and salts are absorbed. It is approximately 1.5 m in length and absorbs 500 to 1000
ml a day.
Bowel Segment Main function
Duodenum
Absorption of CHO, FAT, PRO
Micronutrient absorption (iron, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, copper, folic acid)
Jejunum
Primary site of CHO & PRO absorption
Water-soluble vitamin absorption
Ileum
Primary site of vitamin B12 and bile salt
absorption
Absorption of fat-soluble vitamins
ColonFluid absorption
Na, Cl, K, and fatty acid reabsorption
NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY [2]
Decreased ability for bowel to absorb normally.
Signs and symptoms Diarrhea Weight loss Dehydration Nutritional deficiencies Electrolyte imbalances
The health and amount of remaining small bowel will determine the type of nutrition support a patient will require both short term and long term.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY [2,4]
Other portions of the small intestine will adapt absorption abilities for the removed portions.
The jejunum and ileum are the most important for absorption. The jejunum is more adaptive to absorption problems than the ileum.
The length of ileum that is left will determine the absorption of vitamin B12 and fat malabsorption.
If no ileum is left a patient may be dependent on TPN.
The presence or absence of the ileocecal valve will aff ect transit time, ostomy, how fluid is managed, and if small bowel bacteria will grow.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY [3]
Bowel Segment Complications of Resection
Duodenum Decreased macronutrient digestion
Acidosis, anemia, osteopenia
Jejunum Macronutrient and water-soluble vitamin malabsorption
Fluid and electrolyte losses
Ileum Unable to absorb B12
Loss of fat-soluble vitamins
Decreased absorption of trace elements
Increased risk of renal oxalate stones
Colon Dehydration
Electrolyte abnormalities
Reduce ability to absorb bile salts
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY [2]
Recovery from bowel surgery can vary in length of time depending on: Age Comorbidities Preexisting malnutrition Primary diagnosis Loss of ileocecal valve Length of remaining bowel
Adaptation can begin within 48 hours and continue 12-24 months after surgery. Adaptation occurs by the bowel lengthening and becoming
thicker with a larger diameter.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY [2,5]
TYPES OF RESECTIONS
http://transplants.ucla.edu/body.cfm?id=69
Children Necrotizing enterocolitis
(NEC) Intestinal atresia
(volvulus, hernia, intussusception)
Congenital short bowel syndrome
Trauma Gastroschisis Apple peal anomaly Crohn’s disease Abdominal tumors Radiation enteritis Hirschsprung’s disease
Adults Massive surgical resection Crohn’s Malignancy Radiation enteritis Trauma Vascular catastrophies
(embolism/thrombus) Volvulus Stangulated hernias SB fistulas Surgical bypass Surgical error or obesity
treatment Chronic intestinal pseudo-
obstruction
ETIOLOGY OF SBS [1,]
Two treatment therapies: Pharmocotherapy and Medical Nutrition Therapy Pharmocotherapy includes antimotility agents, antisecretory
agents, H2 Blockers, and IVs MNT includes TPN, EN, and oral feeds, as well as educating
patient on how to eat and care for nutrition support. SNAPP is an acronym to help remember how SBS is treated
S=sepsis – treated with antibiotics and CT scan N=nutrition – hydration is the fist concern, enteral nutrition is
the preferred feeding. First line of feeding is TPN and then weaned to tube feeding and then oral feedings if feasible
A=anatomy – knowing the anatomy helps to determine treatment and side effects
P=protect the skin – if a stoma is created wound care needs to be taught
P=planned surgery – additional surgeries for further resection, stoma care, and fistulas.
MEDICAL TREATMENT [7,4]
MEDICATION USES
TPN is needed immediately after surgery to maintain fl uid and electrolytes until bowel function returns. Should begin within the first 24 hours and is usually required
for the first 7-10 days. TPN energy requirements: 25-35 kcal/kg/day with 1-1.5 g/kg/
day protein EN feedings are started within 2-3 days after surgery or
fl uid and electrolyte losses are reduced and patient is stable. Start with trickle feeds and advanced as tolerated about every 3-7 days. Lactose free formulas are usually suggested to decrease
lactose malabsorption and symptoms.“Management includes meticulous nutritional support,
with emphasis on early advancement of enteral feeds, weaning from parenteral nutrition, monitoring for complications, and addressing possible associated liver dysfunction”
MEDICAL TREATMENT [8]
The ability to return to a normal diet is determined by the amount of remaining bowel, presence of a colon, and an intact ileocecal valve.
Oral rehydration solutions may be required if less than 100 cm of jejunum remains to help absorb sodium.
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS [1,4]
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS [7]
Nutrient Small Bowel Ostomy Colonic continuity
Carbohydrates 50% of total energy complex carbohydrates including soluble fiber, limit simple sugars
50-60% of total energy complex carbohydrates, including soluble fiber
Proteins 20-30% of total energy 20-30% of total energy
Fats <40% of total energy 20-30% of total energy
Fluids ORS important; minimize fluids with meals, sipping of fluids between meals
Minimize fluids with meals, sipping of fluids between meals
Vitamins Daily multivitamin with minerals; monthly B-12; possibly vitamins A, D, and E supplements
Daily multivitamins with minerals; possibly B-12; possibly vitamins A, D, and E supplements
Minerals Generous use of sodium chloride on food; calcium 1,000-1,500 mg daily, possibly iron, magnesium and zinc supplements
400-600 mg calcium with meals; possibly iron, magnesium, and zinc supplements; reduced oxalate
Meals 4-6 small meals 3 small meals plus 2-3 snacks
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
“The goal of therapy is to maximize small bowel absorption of fl uids and nutrients to prevent defi ciencies and dehydration”(7).
The optimal diet for individuals with jejunostomies includes: 50% CHO 20-30% protein ≤40% fat. Including foods high in fiber to help slow gastric emptying, transit
time, and thicken ostomy effl uent. The optimal diet for individuals with intact colon includes:
A diet high in complex CHO, and lower in fat with a distribution 50-60% CHO 20-30% protein 20-30% fat.
It is best to avoid foods and drinks that are high in simple sugars to prevent dumping syndrome
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS [7,1]
Proper eating techniques Eating slowly Resting after eating Minimal fluid with meals Proper preparation of ORS if required Avoid sweets Liberal use of salt – encourage salty foods and the salt shaker Fiber is needed for patients with a colon Lactose should be no more than 20 g/day
Oral diets Patients may need 200-400% more than their needs to take into
account malabsorption A higher carbohydrate diet is recommended for those with a
colon whereas a higher fat, low carbohydrate diet is needed in patients with jejunostomies.
DIETARY ADVICE [1]
Physician Hospitalist Infectious Disease Surgeon
Registered Dietitian Metabolic Nurse NursesPharmacist
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM
CASE STUDY
Age: 66 YOFPresents to hospital with nausea and
vomiting
Medical DiagnosisColitis
MRS. E
Past Medical HistoryCOPDPerforated diverticulitis w/colostomy (now reversed)
HTNGERDBreast Cancer
Past Surgical HistoryExploratory lap and resection
HysterectomyMastectomy
Social HistorySmoke one pack/dayOccasional alcohol use
PAST MEDICAL/SURGICAL/SOCIAL HISTORY
INITIAL NUTRITION ASSESSMENT (9/2/13)
Assessment • Abdominal pain• Constipation• Vomiting• Diet order: NPO• Colitis that may need surgery• Patient is intubated• fragile skin
Anthropometrics • Height: 66 inches • Height: 93.89 kg• BMI = 33.4 • IBW = 59 kg • %IBW = 159%
Labs• Albumin 2.4 L• Phosphorus 8.6 H• Ammonia 149 H• Glucose 220 H
Energy and protein needs (based on facility guidelines)• Calorie needs: 1035-1317
kcals (11-14 kcals/ kg)• Protein needs: 118 g (2
g/kg IBW)• Carbohydrate needs: 147 g
(50%)• Fluid Needs: 1500 mL
Inadequate protein-energy intake RT GI/oral complaints, alteration in GI tract structure and/or function, sedated on ventilator, distention, no bowel sounds, constipation AEB 0% meal, NPO diet restriction, inadequate protein possible d/t surgery pending.
NUTRITION DIAGNOSIS
Intervention TF – continuous; Osmolite with start rate of 10 mL/hour
(goal rate 10 mL/hour). Provides 254.4 kcals, 8 g protein
Goal: Tube feeding will meet 50% of estimated needs within 2-3 days
Monitor/Evaluate Monitor rate for start GI function/tolerance Labs (sodium, glucose, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium,
intake, output) Status weight
NUTRITION INTERVENTION/MONITOR/EVALUATE
Medication Use Nutrition Interaction
Propofol Sedative Provides 1.1 kcals/ml
Levophed Used for hypotension or removing blood flow to the GI tract
Don’t feed while one this medication
Cipro Antibiotic
Vancomycin Antibiotic
Zosyn Antibiotic
MEDICATIONS
Diet order: NPONutrition Dx: Inadequate protein energy intake Meds: propofol @ 12.3 mL/hour = 325 kcal
Levophed @ 0.037 mcg/kg/min Cipro, vancomycin, flagyl, zosyn
Wt: 216 lbs. 9# weight gain in 1 dayLabs
Potassium 3.2; Ammonium 43; Fasting Glucose 173; intake 8729; output 1485 (og=300, stool-50)
Total colectomy, ileostomy, w/jejunostomy (gangrene bowel)
Goal: Tube feeding will meet 50% of estimated needs within 2-3 days
Monitor: GI function/tolerance, labs, weight Follow up daily
9/3/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Diet order: NPONutrition Dx: Inadequate protein-energy intake Meds: propofol @ 14 mL/hour = 370 kcalsLabs
Potassium 3; phosphorus 1.7; Ammonium 38; Fasting Glucose 196; intake 7209; output 3450 (og =800; ileo=150)
Patient remains intubated, s/p colectomy secondary to ischemia, viable ileostomy (95 cmsm bowel from ligament of treitz)
Goal: trickle feeding vs. PN start over next 2 daysCoordination of care: surgery notes may start PN in
next 24 hours.
9/4/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Diet order: NPO Nutrition Dx: Inadequate protein-energy intake Meds: propofol @ 16.8 mL/hour 443 kcals Labs
Phosphorus 1.9; Magnesium 1.5; Fasting Glucose 180; intake 6087; output 4590
Energy: 1035-1317 kcals, 118 g protein Goal: tolerate at least 50% of needs as PN over next 2 days Initiate PN: plan PN goal of 119 g protein (33.5%), 160 g
CHO (39%), 39 g fat (27.5%) to provide ~ 1400 kcal Tkcals provided plus meds=1255 kcals, 0 g lipids, 118 g
protein, 100 g CHO Coordination of care: noted surgery plans to start PN,
discussion of low rate EN but not yet ordered Monitor progression of diet vs. alternative nutrition Follow up daily
9/5/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Diet Order: NPONutrition Dx: Inadequate protein-energy intake Meds: propofol @ 16.8 mL/hour 443 kcalsEnteral kcals = 443 from propofolPN not startedWt. 110.6 kg Labs
Potassium 2.6; Magnesium 1.7; Fasting glucose 102; intake 2605; output 3751; lactic acid 1.5 (ileo 605, g 250)
PN not started secondary to only a femoral line and plans for PICC placement
Energy 1035-1317 kcals 118 g protein
9/6/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Goal: tolerate at least 50% PN/EN over 2 days Initiate EN osmolite at 10 mL/hour; 0 mL flushPatient with short gut syndrome start trickle feed via
g-tube and monitor Initiate PN at goal except CHO at reduced rate, hold
lipids secondary to med rate Provides 118 g protein, 120 CHO, 1400 kcals
Coordination of care: discussed start of trickle feeding with intensivist; plan to start PN after PICC
Monitor progression of diet vs. alternative nutritionFollow up 3-4 times/week
9/6/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Diet order: NPO New PES: Altered GI tract RT alteration in GI tract structure
and function AEB short gut syndrome, malabsorption Goal: Moving forward with PN to provide at least 75% of needs
w/meds over the next 1-2 days. Meds: propofol @ 19 ml/hr = 501 kcals PN: 120 g CHO (75%), 118 g pro (100%), 0 g l ipids, 1440 volume Wt.: 108 kg, wt decreased 2 kg over 1 day (lasix is noted in meds) Labs: alb 2.8, phos 3, mag 2.4, FSBS 171, intake 1439, output 2835,
i leo out 1100 Increase EN to 20 ml/hr @ 2000 today with no fl ush
Total kcals with meds is 508, total protein 18 g PN: decrease CHO to 50%, increase in TF and elevated BG, wil l also
decrease pro d/t increase in TF Total kcals with meds is 1173, 0 g lipids, 100 g protein, 80 g CHO
Collaborated with physician: discussed TF advancement, per MD wil l increase TF to 20 ml/hr at 2000 (24 hr after initial start)
Monitor GI function/tolerance and labs daily Total: 1424 kcals (100%), 118 g pro (100%), meets 72 of CHO needs
9/7/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
EN: osmolite @ 20 ml/hr w/o flush Total kcals with meds: 508 and 18 g protein
PN: propofol 19ml/hr = 501 kcals total kcals= 1173 80 g CHO (50%), 100 g pro (85%), 0 g lipids
Wt.: 106.5 kg, Labs: alb 2.7, pot 3.9, FSBS 178, phos 5.2, alk phos wdlTolerating nutrition regimen ileo out 815, residue 100
mlGoal: PN + TF to provide 75-100% estimated needs of
1317 kcal, 118 g proteinCollaborate with other disciplines: discussed poc with
MD, once osmolite bag empty change to “a more calorie dense formula” per MD request
Monitor GI function/tolerance and labs daily
9/8/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Meds: pepcid, lasix, prednisone, zosynWt. 228# weight loss of 6# in 1 dayLabs: prealb 17.7, BUN 42, Na 146, FSBS 208, intake
2580, output 5131 (stool=435, g-tube=100), CVP 14Tolerating GIGoal: PN+TF to provide 90-100% estimated needs and
protein within 24 hrsEN: change formula to perative @ 30 ml/hr w/o flush
936 kcals, 48 g prot, MD was more calorie dense formulaPN: change tkcals 871, 70 g proteinTotal for TF+PN +meds = 1807 kcals, 118 g pro, 59 g
lipids, 130 g CHOMonitor GI, labs, skin and weight daily
9/9/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Labs: intake 3454, output 5380 (stool=590)Tolerating GI, no change to needsGoal: meet 90-100% estimated kcal and protein needs
via tube feeds next 24-48 hrs.EN: change to 40 ml/hr (increased by MD) no flush
1248 kcals, 64 g prot, 173 g CHOPN: change secondary to change in TF rate, meds:
287 kcals 54 g prot, 21 g CHO (per discussion w/Rph- needs small amount for compounder)
Monitor GI, labs, skin and weight daily
9/10/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Diet order: Clear l iquids Pt took 100% jello and juice this a.m. Meds: lasix, prednisone, zosyn Wt. 204#, 24# weight loss in 2 days (diuresing) Labs: FSBS 144, intake 2949, output 6125, i leo=900 Tolerating GI Energy needs reassessed: 1669-1855 (18-20), 118 g pro (2g/kg
IBW), 220 g CHO (50%), fl uid 1ml/kcal New goal: Meet 100% estimated calories and protein needs via TF
+po diet within next 24-48 hrs. EN: perative @ 40 ml/hr with 3 prostat 1548 kcals (93%), 109 g prot
(92%) Collaborated with MD, MD wants to add prostat to tube feeds today,
but continue TPN for 2 days and begin clear l iquids PN: continue PN w/protein reduced to 50% from yesterday: 35 g
protein=140kcals and 21 g CHO=71 kcals Coordination of care: pt wil l get 1759 kcals (100%) and 144 g
protein (122%) Monitor GI, labs, PO, skin and weight daily
9/11/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Diet order: Regular Labs: Na 139, K 4.3, FSBS 141, output 3150, ileo 1700 Tolerating GI Goal: TF + po to meet at least 100% needs: not met
(however 100% kcal pro needs met with TPN+TF) TPN to discontinue today, diet advanced to regular today,
anticipate goal met in next 1-2 days. Supplement: Ensure BID = provides 700 kcal, 27 g proEN: continue at current rate: perative @ 40 ml/hr with 3
prostat : 1548 kcals (93%), 108 g prot (92%) PN: Stop Monitor GI function/tolerance, PO adequacy dily Anticipate oral intake to slowly increase over the next 1-2
days, for now will keep TF at current goal Pt discharged prior to F/U
9/12/13 NUTRITION FOLLOW UP
Prognosis is good with a full recovery.
Pt left with TF and oral diet
EXPECTED OUTCOMES
SBS management is very complicated and needs careful management by a team including: physician, dietitian, surgeon.
The amount of bowel resected aff ects when and how a patient can be fed
It is very important to know the exact amount of bowel left and what sections they are.
Things I would have done diff erently When doing this assessment I would probably explain
more the amount of bowel left.Educate the patient on how they are supposed to eat. Recommend using a standard formula such as Isosource
that has a higher calorie instead of perative.
LESSONS LEARNED
1. Parrish CR. The clinician’s guide to short bowel syndrome. Nutrition Issues in Gastroeneterology 2005;(31): 67-100.
2. Nutrition Care Manual. Short Bowel Syndrome. 3. Nutrition Care Manual. Bowel Resection. 4. Peck J, Soo L, Boland L, Windsor A, Engledow A. Short bowel
syndrome: the pathophysiology and treatment. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2012;10(2):32-38.
5. Krause6. Rahhal RM. Short Bowel Syndrome. Chapter 20. 295-305.
www.pnjhuaq.mhprofessional.com/downloads/products/0071633790/bishop_ch20_295_305.pdf.
7. Wall EA. An overview of short bowel syndrome management: adherence, adaptation, and practical recommendations. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2013. 1200-1208.
8. Donohoe CL, Reynolds JV. Short Bowel Syndrome. The Surgeon. 2010: 270-276.
9. Seetharam P, Rodrigues G. Short bowel syndrome: a review of management options. Saudi J Gastroenterol . 2011;17:229-35.
REFERENCES