climate change: impact on crop production and its coping ... · climate change: impact on crop...
TRANSCRIPT
Climate Change: Impact on Crop Production and its Coping Strategies
Climate Change: Impact on Crop Production Climate Change: Impact on Crop Production and its Coping Strategiesand its Coping Strategies
W. Sultana, M. A. Aziz and F. AhmedW. Sultana, M. A. Aziz and F. Ahmed
Agronomy Division Agronomy Division Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI)
Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh
27 August 2008
22
33
44
55
Change in temperature and precipitationBangladesh IssueBangladesh Issue
According to IPCC● Average temperature has registered an increasing trend of about
1 º C in May and 0.5 º C in November during the 14 year period from 1985 to 1998
● The annual mean rainfall exhibits increasing trends in Bangladesh
● Salt water from the Bay of Bengal is reported to have penetrated100 km or more inland along tributary channels during the dry season.
66
Climate Change Impact
• Summer are becoming hotter
• Monsoon irregular with untimely rainfall
• Increased river flow and inundation during monsoon
• Heavy rainfall over short period causing water logging
•Increased frequency, intensity and recurrence of flood
• Crop damage due to flash flood
• Very little rainfall in dry period
• Crop failure due to drought
• Prolonged cold spell
• Salinity intrusion along the coast region
77
88
MAPS SHOWING EXISTING DROUGHT,MAPS SHOWING EXISTING DROUGHT,AND DROUGHT IN THE YEAR 2030 & 2075 AND DROUGHT IN THE YEAR 2030 & 2075
EXISTING DROUGHT
DROUGHT CLASSES (KHARIF SEASON)
Very Severe DroughtSevere DroughtModerate DroughtLess Moderate DroughtSlight Drought
Very Slight to NilSevere & ModerateModerate & Less ModerateSunderbansForest
ADDITIONAL DROUGHTPRONE AREAS IN 2030
ADDITIONAL DROUGHTPRONE AREAS IN 2075
99
Climate Change: Impact on Crop Production
Crop production in Bangladesh would be extremely vulnerable under climate change scenarios, as a result, food security of the country will be at risk. The increase in air temperature would shorten our winter season and the productivity of some rabi crop will be greatly affected.
1010
Objectives
• To study the climate change impact on field crop production
• To determine coping strategies in future to address climate change
1111
Methodology
• Various books, journals, workshop/symposium proceedings, reports, publications etc. related to topic have been reviewed
• Research under control condition was done in laboratory throughHoagland solution culture and in vinyl house through pot culture
• Field research was done at BARI Research Farm
• In the coastal area field research was done in the farmer’s field through On Farm Research Division
• Data has also been collected from secondary sources and in consultation with the respective resource personnel
1212
Temperature stress
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Fig.8. Effect of sow ing time on tasseling, harvesting and grain yield of hybrid maize
Tasseling (DAS) 80 84 87
Harvesting (DAS) 149 146 136
yield (t/ha) 9.13 8.39 7.78
Nov (30) sown
Dec(15) sown
Dec(30) sown
Fig.9.Fortnightly mean temperatures during maize grow ing period (2006-2007)(left three arrow s idicate sow ing time, middle three tasseling and right three harvesting time, similar type arrow s are used in dif ferent grow th stage for
individual sow ing time)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Nov(15)
Nov(30)
Dec(15)
Dec(31)
Jan(15)
Jan(31)
Feb(15)
Feb(29)
Mar(15)
Mar(31)
Apr(15)
Apr(30)
May(15)
May(31)
Months
Tem
pera
ture
( o C
)
Maximum Minimum
1313
Drought stress
Yield of maize as affected by drought stress at different growth stages
--6.243.10CV (%)20.1115.87142.07 c145.77 cDrought stress at grain filling stage25.0017.86133.37 c142.31 cDrought stress at tasseling stage7.409.78164.67b156.31 bDrought stress at vegetative stage
--177.83 a173.25 aNo drought stress (control)2006-072005-062006-072005-06
Yield decreased over control (%)
Grain yield (g/plant)Treatment.
Source: Ahmed et. al., 2008
1414
Drought stress avoidance
Performance of cowpea at different date of sowing in thesaline area of Kuakata, Potuakhali in 2006-07
-----31 December1210117.649.22021 December1360149.059.92111 December
Seed yield (kg/ha)
Seeds/podPods/plantPlant height (cm)
Plant population
(m-2)
Sowing date
Source: Aziz et. al., 2007
1515
29 January sowing 11 December sowing
Mungbean at farmers field of Potuakhali non saline coastal area
Drought stress avoidance
1616
Water logging stress
● The influence of excess rainfall stress on growth, dry matter production and yield of twenty-six mungbean varieties / genotypes was evaluated and found that BINA mug 5 was more tolerant under excess rainfall stress compared to other varieties/ genotypes in respect of total dry matter production, grain yield and green biomass production (Aziz et. al., 2008a).
1717
Water logging stress
● Sesame cultivars under water logged condition at different growth stages indicated that all the cultivars damaged 100% when water logged at flowering (
72 hrs) and pod development stages. About 3-75% plant mortality was found when the field was water logged at vegetative stage. BARI Til 3 was found water logged tolerant at vegetative stage (Saha et. al. 2008).
Control Water logged at vegetative stage
Water logged at flowering stage Water logged at pod dev. stage
1818
Salinity StressIdentification of salt tolerant genotypes:Screening with 50 genotypes of each crops for their salt tolerance at germination and early vegetative stage under control condition found that:- 2 mungbean genotypes (BM 01 and BM 08) - 4 soybean genotypes - 7 mustard genotypes - 4 barley genotypes and - 5 maize cultivars were selected as salt tolerant genotypes
Source: Aziz et al., 2007
1919
Grain yield (g/plant) of BM 01 (tolerant) and BM 21(susceptible)Grain yield (g/plant) of BM 01 (tolerant) and BM 21(susceptible) as as affected by affected by NaClNaCl salinity at the vegetative (V), flowering (F) andsalinity at the vegetative (V), flowering (F) andpodpod--filling (P) stages of growth (Aziz, 2003) filling (P) stages of growth (Aziz, 2003)
Vegetative stage is being more sensitive than flowering and pod-filling stages. The salt tolerance in mungbean was in order of vegetative stage > flowering stage > pod filling stage
Salt tolerance in mungbean at different growth stages:
2020
Concentration of NaConcentration of Na+ + ion in different plantion in different plant--parts of BM 01 and BM 21 as parts of BM 01 and BM 21 as affected by salinity at the vegetative (V), flowering (F) and poaffected by salinity at the vegetative (V), flowering (F) and podd--filling stages of filling stages of growth. Error bars represent standard error growth. Error bars represent standard error (Aziz, 2003) (Aziz, 2003)
Re-absorption and Re-translocation
Salt Tolerance Mechanisms in Mungbean
2121
Succulence of individual leaf of BM 01 and BM 21 Succulence of individual leaf of BM 01 and BM 21 as affected by as affected by NaClNaCl salinitysalinity (Aziz, 2003) (Aziz, 2003)
Succulence
2222
KK++/Na/Na++ ratio of ratio of mungbeanmungbean genotypes of BM 01 and BM genotypes of BM 01 and BM 21 as by 21 as by NaClNaCl salinity salinity (Aziz, 2003) (Aziz, 2003)
Na+ : K+ ratio
BM 01 BM 21
2323
Sodium and potassium content of Sodium and potassium content of mungbeanmungbean genotypesgenotypesof BM 01 and BM 21 as affected by of BM 01 and BM 21 as affected by NaClNaCl salinity salinity (Aziz, 2003) (Aziz, 2003)
Leaf to leaf compartmentation
2424
ProlineProline content in leaves (A: absolute and B: relative) of content in leaves (A: absolute and B: relative) of mungbeanmungbean genotypes BM 01 (saltgenotypes BM 01 (salt-- tolerant) and BM tolerant) and BM 21(salt21(salt--susceptible) as affected by susceptible) as affected by NaClNaCl salinity salinity (Aziz, 2003) (Aziz, 2003)
BM 21
Osmoregulation
Percent injury index in leaves (A: absolute, B: relPercent injury index in leaves (A: absolute, B: relative ative and C: functional relationship) of and C: functional relationship) of mungbeanmungbean genotypes genotypes BM 01 (saltBM 01 (salt-- tolerant) and BM 21(salttolerant) and BM 21(salt--susceptible) as susceptible) as affected by affected by NaClNaCl salinitysalinity
Membrane stability
2626
B M 0 1 B M 2 1 P h o to n f lu x d e n s it ie s (m o l m -2 s -1 )
-1 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0
Phot
osyn
thes
is(m
ol C
O2
m-2
S-1
) 0 m M 5 0 m M 1 0 0 m M
-1 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0Phot
osyn
thes
is(m
ol C
O2
m-2
S-1
)
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0
Stom
atal
con
dact
ance
(mol
m-2
S-1
)
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0
Stom
atal
con
dact
ance
(mol
m-2
S-1
)
2 0 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
3 5 0
4 0 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0
Inte
rcel
lula
t CO
2 con
cent
ratio
n
(ppm
)
2 0 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
3 5 0
4 0 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0
Inte
rcel
lula
r C
O2 c
once
ntra
tion
(ppm
)
Gas Exchange Characters
2727
Table I. Yield and yield attributes of mungbean varieties at FSRD site of Noakhali and Benarpota during 2007-08
12.9516.671.5611.8713.3015.94CV(%)5.380.4671.1356.8221.692.531LSD (0.05)
0.670.4939.0030.036.3311.23BU 040.590.5248.3329.878.0010.10BU 020.650.9639.6638.596.6610.13BARI mug 60.620.9837.6635.527.0012.53BARI mug 50.771.4424.0030.1016.6616.43BM 080.711.0621.6625.4617.3314.36BM 01
BenarpotaNoakhaliBenarpotaNoakhaliBenarpotaNoakhali
Grain yield (t/ha)1000 seed wt. (g)Pod/plantVarieties/lines
Source: Aziz et al., 2008d Soil salinity level : 4.45 to 6.97 dS/m
28
we& Gg 08
2929
Fodder yield of maize grown in saline areas of Noakhali
****Level of significance5.713.02 b2.69 bBM-63.731.94 b1.79 bBARI sweet corn6.823.40 b3.42 bBarnali
20.0811.50 a8.58 aKhoibhuttaComposite2.411.37 b1.04 bPacific-605.552.95 b2.60 bPacific-11
18.4010.73 a7.67 aBHM-45.793.33 b2.46 bBHM-3HybridTotal80 DAE60 DAE
Fodder yield (t/ha)Varieties/lies
Source: Farida et. al., 2007 Salinity level: 3.5 to 7.97
3030
Yield and yield attributing characters of salt tolerant Barley varieties during rabi season, 2007-2008
9.625.18139.627.125.279.628.8316.29CV(%)-2.151.41-33.635.0-43.727.5BB-4-1.241.74-28.337.3-39.032.8BHL- 13
1.55-2.3329.8-39.644.1-38.7BHL- 151.172.001.9927.332.337.739.245.636.5BHL- 181.341.992.1427.731.038.342.042.338.1BHL- 19Pot.Sat.Noa.Pot.Sat.Noa.Pot.Sat.Noa.
Grain yield (t/ha)1000 grain weight (g)Grains/spike (no)Variety
Noa. = Noakhali, Sat. = Satkhira, Pot. = PotuakhaliSource: Farida et. al., 2008
3131
Yield and yield attributing characters of mustard relaying with T.aman at Satkhira MLT site during rabi season of 2007-08
6.173.258.6910.963.6910.11-CV(%)0.136.243.679.656.2620.89-LSD(.05)1.063.1019.9041.9787.83128.392BARI sarisha-151.574.0717.8071.60124.193.33100BARI sarisha-111.203.8717.8048.9386.07113.785BARI sarisha-91.003.7025.2038.7078.30114.785Tor-70.754.7022.8737.5074.6098.6794BINA sarisha-5
Seed yield (t/ha)
1000 seed
wt. (g)
Seed/siliqua(no.)
Siliqua/ plant(no.)
Plant height(cm)
Plant popu./m2
Days to maturity
Variety
Source; Aziz et al., 2008b
3232
Yield and yield attributing characters of maize at Banerpota and Kuakata 2007-08
9.687.603.123.936.325.61CV(%)0.560.82NS17.36NS45.90LSD(.05)
7.646.7727.0253.33580489.33Pacific 9847.595.6426.9250.00578492.00Pacific 9837.626.6327.0270.00b579491.33Pacific 607.697.9127.6276.66602425.66Pacific 118.264.6127.3215.00583491.66BARI hybrid maize 59.086.8928.6255.00612484.33BARI hybrid maize 38.126.6727.2296.66585451.66BARI hybrid maize 2
KuakataBanerpotaKuakataBanerpotaKuakataBanerpotaGrain yield (t/ha)1000 grain wt. (g)Grain/cob (no.)Variety/line
Source; Aziz et al., 2008c
3333Source; Aziz et al., 2008c
Hybrid maize in coastal area after Sidr
3434
Performance of mungbean varieties at different date of sowing in the saline area of Kuakata, Potuakhali in 2006-07
11.139.2415.218.0912.13CV (%)432 b7.67 b10.67 b20.70 c15.33 b31 December1106 a9.67 a20.1 a26.44 b 36.89 a21 December1161 a10.00 a16.44 a31.22 a38.33 a11 December
Yield (kg/ha)
Seeds/podpods/plantPlant height (cm)
Plant population(m-2)
Sowing date
Source: Aziz et. al., 2007
3535
Yield and yield attributes of cowpea for dates of sowing as affected by salinity stress
11.421.649.772.021.75CV(%)2352.832.520.221.81LSD (.05%)
----49.051 March83380.0010.534.9350.1415 February98391.0012.915.6050.801 February117792.3313.835.9153.1915 January103789.0014.305.5953.371 January
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
1000-seed
weight (g)
Seed/ podPod/ plant
Plant height (cm)
Date of sowing
Source: Aziz et al., 2006
36
Salinity management
Without mulching
Mulching bitter gourd
With mulching (Melon)
Salt
37
Tomato in raised bed with mulch
Visitor in tomato fields in Noakhali Okra in raised bed with mulch
Salinity management
Relay mustard
38
Salinity management
Water harvest technology
3939
Coping Strategies
• Identification of heat/waterlogg/salinity/drought tolerant genotypes of different crops• Introduction of saline tolerant varieties of mungbean, soybean, mustard, barley and
maize in the coastal area• Study the heat/waterlogg/salinity/drought tolerance mechanisms of crops and
development of tolerant varieties • Cultivation of vegetables and fruits on homestead plots in the coastal area • Planting saline tolerant of fruit and timber trees for long term income generation• Establishment of community nurseries and distribution of indigenous varieties of
tree samplings• Switch location (regional or within farm) to new climates or soils• Adaptation to change growing season or to shift timing of heat stress• Plant deeper in drier conditions; thin crop in dry years to lower plant density
and reduce competition for moisture
4040
Coping strategies in problem areas to address climate change
41
Hilly Areas
Hybrid maize
Mungbean Mustard
Jhum cultivation
42
Charlands
43
Haor Area
4444
Conclusion
• The development and introduction of environmental stress tolerant
varieties/technologies and corresponding dissemination measures are
important and need to be facilitated by national research through
development of Environmental Stress Research Centre.
• New crops and agricultural practices has to build up and shared on the
farm level.
• Conservation of the environment and sustainable development
strategies will definitely protect the earth and its environment and will
particularly save countries like Bangladesh from the catastrophe which
can be induced by global warming.
45
Thank You All
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute