cleveland, ohio 44135 nasa john h. glenn research center ...€¦ · (ebcs) development objectives...

31
DEVELOPMENT OF NASA'S ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATINGS FOR SIC/SIC COMPOSITES: PRIME-RELIANT DESIGN AND DURABILITY PERSPECTIVES Dongming Zhu Materials and Structures Division NASA John H. Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 The work was supported by NASA Fundamental Aeronautics Program (FAP) Transformational Tools and Technologies (TTT) Project Advanced Ceramic Matrix Composites: Science and Technology of Materials, Design, Applications, Performance and Integration An ECI Conference, Santa Fe, NM November 5-9, 2017 1

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DEVELO

PMEN

T OF N

ASA'S AD

VAN

CED

ENVIR

ON

MEN

TAL BAR

RIER

C

OATIN

GS FO

R SIC

/SIC C

OM

POSITES: PR

IME-R

ELIANT D

ESIGN

AND

D

UR

AB

ILITY PERSPEC

TIVES

Dongm

ing Zhu

Materials and S

tructures Division

NA

SA

John H. G

lenn Research C

enter C

leveland, Ohio 44135

The work w

as supported by NASA

Fundamental Aeronautics Program

(FAP) Transformational Tools

and Technologies (TTT) Project

Advanced Ceram

ic Matrix C

omposites:

Science and Technology of Materials, D

esign, Applications, Performance and Integration

An EC

I Conference, Santa Fe, N

M

Novem

ber 5-9, 2017

1

NASA

’s Advanced Environmental B

arrier Coating System

s for C

eramic M

atrix Com

posites (CM

Cs):

Enabling Technology for N

ext Generation Low

Em

ission, High E

fficiency and Light-W

eight Propulsion, and E

xtreme E

nvironment M

aterial System

s —

NASA

Environmental B

arrier Coatings (EB

Cs) developm

ent objectives •

Help achieve future engine tem

perature and performance goals

• E

nsure system durability – tow

ards prime reliant coatings and m

aterial systems

• E

stablish database, design tools and coating lifing methodologies

Hybrid E

lectric Propulsion A

ircraft and C

oatings (UH

TC

C)

• Im

prove technology readiness

Entry, D

escending and Landing: U

ltra High C

eramics

Fixed Wing S

ubsonic and Supersonics A

ircraft

2

Temperature

Capability

NA

SA Environm

ental Barrier C

oating Developm

ent Goals

• E

mphasize tem

perature capability, performance and durability

• Develop 2700°F environm

ental barrier coating technologies -For 2400°F (1316°C

) and 2700°F (1482°C) C

eramic M

atrix Com

posites (CM

Cs) in

support of next generation turbine engines -Focus on advanced C

MC

combustors and highly loaded turbine airfoils

-Particularly also em

phasize highly loaded turbine blades

Step increase in the m

aterial’s temperature capability

Temperature

3000°F SiC/SiC

CM

CCapability

(T/E(T/EBBC)C) ssuurfarfaccee

airfoil and combustor

3000°F+ (1650°C+)

technologies 2700°F SiC

/SiC thin

2700°F (1482qC)

turbine EBC

systems for

* Recession: <5 m

g/cm2 per 1000 hr (40-50 atm

., Mach 1~2)

** Com

ponent strength and toughness requirements

Gen II –

Currentcomm

ercialG

en IIIG

en. IV

Increase in 'T

G

across T/EBC

Single Crystal Superalloy

Ceramic M

atrix Composite

Gen II – Current com

mercial

en III G

en. IV

Increase in 'T across T/EB

C

Single Crystal Superalloy

Ceramic M

atrix Composite

2800ºFcom

bustor TB

C

2500ºFTurbine TB

C

CM

C airfoils

2700°F (1482°C) G

en III SiC

/SiC

CM

Cs

2400°F (1316°C) G

en I and Gen II SiC

/SiC

CM

Cs

2000°F (1093°C)

GGenen II

YYearear

3

Outline

─ Environm

ental barrier coating systems: tow

ards Prime-R

eliant system

s •

Thermom

echanical, environment and therm

ochemical stability of E

BC

s •

Prim

e-reliant EB

Cs, initial design approach and requirem

ent

─ A

dvanced environmental barrier coating system

s (EBC

s) for C

MC

airfoils and combustors

• N

AS

A advanced turbine EB

C coating system

status •

Developm

ent and testing, durability perspectives

─ D

esign tool and life prediction perspectives of coated CM

C

components

• A

dvanced Testing •

Em

phasizing thermom

echanical, environment and therm

ochemical

interactions

─ Sum

mary and future directions

4

SiC

/SiC

CM

C

Prime-R

elaiant EBC

Systems for Si-B

ased Ceram

ic Matrix

Com

posites−

NASA’s advanced environm

ental barrier and bond coat development: P

rime-reliant

designs •

High toughness and low

conductivity EB

C top coat

• A

lternating Com

position Layered Coatings (A

CLC

s) and composite coatings,

including improving im

pact resistance •

Advanced doped m

ulticomponent E

BC

s •

Prim

e-reliant designed bond coats •

Ultim

ately environmental resistant C

MC

s with high therm

al conductivities H

fO2 -Y

2 O3 -Yb

2 O3 -G

d2 O

3 -(SiO

2 )e.g.,

HfO

2 -Y2 O

3 -Yb2 O

3 -Gd

2 O3 -Ta

2 O2 -TiO

2 -(SiO

2 ) Low

expansion alloyed-HfO

2 , and HfO

2 aluminates

Interlayer R

E doped Hf, H

f RE silicate and/or m

ulti-rare earth silicate EBC

s 2700F bond coats

5

Fundamental R

ecession Issues of CM

Cs and EB

Cs

-R

ecession of Si-based Ceram

ics (a) C

onvective; (b) Convective w

ith film-cooling

-Low S

iO2 activity E

BC

systems

-Advanced rig testing and modeling

Com

plex recession behavior of CM

C and E

BC

s studied in NA

SA H

igh P

ressure Burner R

ig, included film-cooled recession

SiO2 + 2H

2 O(g) = Si(O

H)4 (g)

Recession rate = const. V

1/2 P(H

2O) 2/(P

total ) 1/2

Com

bustion gas

SiO2 + 2H

2 O(g) = Si(O

H)4 (g)

Com

bustion gas

Cooling gas

(a) (b)

6

Continued

ions of environm

ental barrier coatings -EB

C system

s, improved stability in

tability evaluated on S

iC/S

iCC

MC

s in high velocity, high pressure burner

Fundamental R

ecession Issues of CM

Cs and EB

Cs -

EB

C s

rig environment

SiC Wt. Loss (mg/cm2)

-15

-10 -5 0

1385 C

1446 C

1252 C

1343 C

Robinson and Sm

ialek, J. Am

. Ceram

Soc. 1999

°

°

°

°

0 20

40 60

80 100

Exposure Tim

e (hrs)

-Early generat

turbine environments

Com

bustor coating Turbine coating

HfO

2 based low k -A

PS H

fO2 based low

k – EB-PV

D

7

Fundamental R

ecession Issues of CM

Cs and EB

Cs -

Continued

E

BC

stability evaluated on SiC

/SiC

CM

Cs in high velocity, high pressure burner rig environm

ent

0.001

0.01

0.1 1 100.0005 0.00055 0.0006 0.00065 0.0007 0.00075 0.0008

Specific weight change, mg/cm2-h

1/T, K-1

1300Tem

perature, °C

1400 1500

12001600

SiC/SiC

under high velocity BSA

S Baseline

1100 1000

Tyranohex SA (6 atm

, 200m/s)

Tyranohex SA (16 atm

, 30m/s)

NA

SA EB

C stability devlopm

ent goal: 5 mg/cm

2 -h

Com

bustor coating Turbine coating

HfO

2 based low k -A

PS H

fO2 based low

k – EB-PV

D

High pressure burner rig, 16 atm

, 31 hr -E

arly generations of environmental barrier coatings -E

BC

systems

8

failure

Environmental B

arrier Coating in Sim

ulated Load-Fatigue Testing

Environments (Laser H

igh Heat Flux R

ig) -

EB

C Yb

2 SiO

5 /Yb2 S

i2 O7 /S

i on Melt Infiltrated (M

I) Prepreg S

iC/S

iC C

MC

substrates -

Tested in air, furnace isothermal at 1316°C

; and in heat flux steam, at T

EBC 1316°C

, TC

MC

at ~1200°C

-

Lower C

MC

failure strain observed in the steam-heat flux test environm

ent

failure

failure

failure

Fatigue strains (amplitudes) – Tim

e Plot Therm

al conductivity – Time Plot

In steam-jet, EB

C cracking and

recession

-Ytterbium

mono-silicate recession observed in the test

-Therm

al conductivity for monitoring coating delam

ination

9

Environm

ental Barrier C

oating in Simulated Load-Fatigue

Testing Environments (Laser H

igh Heat Flux R

ig) -Continued

-C

rack and recession failure in air and steam tests

In Air; EB

C cracking

In steam; EB

C cracking and volatility

Com

p onent

Type C

onc., A

t%

Conc.,

Wt%

, O

C

alc 49.07

9.59 Si

Calc

9.79 3.36

Yb C

alc 41.14

87.04 Total

100.00 100.00

EDS 25D

25D

10

Advanced NASA

EBC

Developm

ents

NA

SA

advanced EB

C system

s emphasizing high stability H

fO2 -and ZrO

2 -RE

2 O3 -S

iO2 E

BC

system

s and HfO

2 -Si and R

are Earth – S

ilicon bond coat systems

― N

AS

A m

ulticomponent R

are Earth R

E2 S

i2-x O7-2x , such as (Yb,G

d,Y) 2 Si2-x O

7-2x environmental

barrier systems

― R

are earth-doped HfO

2 -ZrO2 , and H

fO2 -doped R

are Earth (R

E) silicates are am

ong the advanced E

BC

systems

• Im

proved high temperature stability and creep strength;

• Facilitating nano-cluster form

ation with high concentration rare earth com

pound phases; •

Improving C

MA

S resistance

TEM-EELS

Com

position map

11

NA

SA EB

C B

ond Coat System

s N

AS

A E

BC

System

s •

HfO

2 -RE

2 O3 -S

iO2 /R

E2 S

i2-x O7-2x environm

ental barrier systems

• C

ontrolled silica content and rare earth dopants to improve E

BC

stability, toughness, erosion and C

MA

S resistance

• H

fO2 -S

i based bond coat, controlled oxygen partial pressure •

Advanced rare earth-S

i composition system

s for 2700°F+ long-term applications

• E

arly RE

2 O3 -S

iO2 -A

l2 O3 or YA

G S

ystems

• D

evelop prime-reliant com

posite EB

C-C

MC

s, HfS

iRE

(CN

) systems

Bond coat systems for prime reliant EBCs; capable of self-healing %

1212

Developm

ent of Advanced H

fO2 -Si B

ond Coats

– C

oating architecture and HfO

2 contents can be effectively controlled and optim

ized –

Si:H

f atomic ratio preferably 2:1 – 1:1

– R

eported Spinodal decom

position of hafnium-silicate system

s

100 100

Silicon concentration, at%

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

Si

O

Oxygen concentration, at% 0

0 0

1020

3040

50 H

afnium concentration, at%

13

Microstructures of Furnace C

yclic Tested GdYbSi(O

) EBC

System

s —

C

yclic tested cross-sections of PV

D processed YbG

dSi(O

) bond coat —

S

elf-grown rare earth silicate E

BC

s and with som

e RE

-containing SiO

2 rich phase separations —

R

elatively good coating adhesion and cyclic durability

1500°C, in air, 500, 1 h cycles /

B

A

-C

omplex coating architectures

after the testing -

Designed w

ith EB

C like

compositions – Self-grow

n E

BC

s

Com

position (mol%

) spectrum A

rea #1 SiO

2 67.98

Gd2O

3 11.95

Yb2O

3 20.07

Com

position (mol%

) spectrum A

rea #2 SiO

2 66.03

A

B Gd2O

3 10.07

Yb2O

3 23.9

14

Microstructures of C

yclic Tested GdYbSi(O

) EBC

System

s-Continued

Cyclic tested cross-sections of P

VD

processed YbGdS

i(O) bond coat

Self-grow

n rare earth silicate EB

Cs and w

ith some R

E-containing S

iO2 rich phase separations

Interface growth instability

1500°C, in air, 500, 1 hr cycles

Outlined area

SpotC

omposition (m

ol%)

SiO2

66.72 G

d2O3

8.62 Y

b2O3

24.66

Com

position (mol%

) SiO

2 96.15

Gd2O

3 1.2

Yb2O

3 2.64

15

Advanced EBC

developments – Som

e Hybrid Air-Plasm

a Spray/EB

-PVD Turbine C

ombustor EB

C System

s and Qualification

ND

2 N

D6

ND

7

Surface spallation

Tests •

Achieved low

thermal conductivity ranging from

1.0 -1.7 W

/m-K

Dem

onstrated high pressure environmental

stability at 2600-2650°F, 12-20 atm. in the high

pressure burner rig •

Surface recession or m

icro-spallation for less tougher coating system

s

2” diameter N

D3

EB

C/S

iC/S

iC

specimen after

testing in the high pressure burner rig A

t 2600°F+, 200 m

/s

High pressure burner rig tested new

ND

series Hybrid

EBC

systems coated on 2” diam

eter Gen II P

repreg S

iC/S

iC C

MC

s 16

Erosion and Impact A

spects: Early Mach 0.3 B

allistic Im

pact Tests of HfO

2 -Si Bond C

oat EBC

Systems

Advanced high toughness E

BC

s tested with com

parable performance of best TB

Cs

ND

2 ─

M

ore advanced EB

C com

positions currently also in developments

Spalled area, cm2

Projectile velocity, m/s

150 200 250 300 350

400 450

1.6 7Y

SZ and low k TB

Cs ZrR

ETT A

TES series N

D2

ND

3N

D6

ND

7SU

P-ERA

7.4 EBC

t'-ZrO

2/NA

SA EB

C

Cubic low

k ZrO2 k-N

ASA

EBC

500

NA

SA SU

P-ERA

7.4 EBC

ND

6 NA

SA EB

C

t'/ NA

SA EB

CN

D7 N

ASA

EBC Spalled

ND

3

ND

6 EBC

ND

7 EBC

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

ND

3

ND

6

SUP7.1A

EBC

0.4

0.2 SU

P-ERA

7.4 0.00.0

0.5 1.0

1.5 2.0

2.5 Energy, J

SUP-ER

A 7.4 EB

C N

D7

17

Advanced EB

C C

oating Material Strength Evaluations

– H

igh strength EB

Cs and bond coats are critical for prim

e-reliant designs •

Multicom

ponent EB

Cs and first-generation H

fO2 -S

i bond coat achieved 150-200 MP

a strength at high tem

perature (1400°C+)

• M

ulticomponent silicates show

ed improved high tem

perature strengths compared to

baseline yttrium and ytterbium

silicates •

High strength and high toughness are critical for erosion and fatigue cracking

669-Yb

2 Si 2 O 7

660-Y 2 Si2 O

7

659-Yb

2 SiO5

Strength, MPa

resistance 350

300

250

200

646-Specially toughened t' like HfO

2 648-EB

C B

ond Coat C

onstituent 658-A

E9932 660-Y

2Si2O7

657-Zr-RE silicate (M

ulti-component)

669-Yb2Si2O

7 670-R

are Earth Disilicate (M

ulti-component)

681-HfO

2-Si 696-EB

C B

ond Coat C

onstituent 150

100

500 0 200

400 600

800 1000

1200 1400

1600 Tem

perature, °CFlexure strengths of selected E

BC

materials

18

High H

eat Flux and CM

AS Resistance are Ensured by Advanced

High M

elting Point Coating, and M

ulti-Com

ponent Com

positions –

Non stoichiom

etric characteristics of the CM

AS

– rare earth silicate reacted apatite phases – up to 200 h testing

– D

ifference in partitioning of ytterbium vs. yttrium

in apatite •

Average AE

O/R

E2 O

3 ratio ~ 0.68 for ytterbium silicate – C

MA

S system

Average AE

O/R

E2 O

3 ratio ~ 0.22 for yttrium silicate – C

MA

S system

Ahlborg and Zhu, Surface &

Coatings Technology 237 (2013) 79–87.

RE

2 O3

SiO2

AEO

Com

position in apatite (100 hr):

Yttrium

Silicate EBC

Com

position in apatite (100 hr):

Ytterbium

Silicate EBC

19

High H

eat Flux and CM

AS Resistance Tests of Advanced EB

C

Systems

– M

ulticomponent rare earth silicate E

BC

showed im

proved performance

– S

ilicate based coatings still sensitive to CM

AS

concentrations (estimated

variation between average C

MA

S at 25 m

g/cm2 to m

ore concentrated region C

MA

S at 75 m

g/cm2)

– S

ome coating dam

age occurred for EB

Cs in JE

TS tests at higher C

MA

S loading

regions

Initially infiltrated /

Temperature, C

25h / 50h

100h 4450 Cycles

2000 C

MA

S tempertaure

Tsurface, C

Tback, C

1500

1000

500

Turbine vane EB

C, C

MA

S JE

TS

0 0 50

100 150

tests (100 h) Tim

e, hours

Laser rig test of advanced coating systems

20

Thermal G

radient Tensile Creep R

upture Testing of Advanced Turbine Environm

ental Barrier C

oating SiC/SiC

CM

Cs

Advanced high stability m

ulti-component hafnia-rare earth silicate based turbine

environmental barrier coatings being successfully tested for 1000 hr creep rupture

EB

C-C

MC

creep, fatigue and environmental interaction is being em

phasized

EB

C coated tensile specim

en

Laser beam

delivery optic system

C

ooling show

er head

Total strain, %

1.5 G

en II CMC w

ith advanced EBC Tested at 15 ksi &

heat flux Tsurface = 2700°F

Gen II CM

C-uncoated Tinterface= 2500°F

1.0 2400 F

TCMC back=2320°F

Tested at 20 ksi, 1316°C Typical prem

ature failure

Gen II CM

C with advanced EBC

tested 20 ksi, 1316°C 2400 F

0.5 G

en II CMC w

ith advanced EBC Tested at 20 ksi &

heat fluxjets

Tsurface = 2750ºF G

en II CMC uncoated

Tinterface = 2450ºF H

igh tem

perature 2400 F

Tested at 15 ksi, 1316°CTCM

C back = 2250ºC2250 F

0.0 1

extensometer

0 200

400 600

800 1000

1200Test specim

en Tim

e, hours

21

Thermal G

radient Fatigue-Creep Testing of A

dvanced Turbine Environm

ental Barrier C

oating SiC/SiC

CM

Cs -

Continued

Advanced environm

ental barrier coatings – Prepreg C

MC

systems dem

onstrated long-term

EB

C-C

MC

system creep rupture capability at stress level up to 20 ksi at T

EBC 2700°F, T

CM

C

interface ~2500°F

The HfO

2 -Si based bond coat show

ed excellent durability in the long term creep tests

EBC

s on Gen II C

MC

after 1000 h fatigue H

ybrid EBC

s on Gen II C

MC

after 1000 h testing

low cycle creep fatigue testing

22

High H

eat Flux Thermom

echanical fatigue Tests of A

dvanced NA

SA EB

C-B

ond Coats System

s on CM

Cs

• Laser H

igh Heat Flux them

omechanical fatigue testing of a H

fO2 -S

i and NA

SA

advanced E

BC

baseline with steam

at 3 Hz, 2600-2700°F, and 69 M

Pa m

aximum

stress with stress

ratio 0.05, completed 500 h testing

• Tsurface = 1500-1600°C

T= 1320-1350°C

• H

eat Flux = 170 W/cm

2 3 hz fatigue testing at 10 ksi loading C

ompleted 500 hr testing

Testing proving vital failure m

echanisms in a sim

ulated test environm

ents

• S

pecimen had som

e degradations

EBC

s

EBC

s H

igher Si content HfO

2 -Si

2323

EBC

-CM

C Therm

al Gradient C

reep Rupture and

Delam

ination Modeling

A

n equivalent stress model is established for E

BC

multicrack stress intensity m

odeling: em

phasize creep, thermal gradient and stress rupture interactions

D. Zhu and L. G

hosn, “Creep, Fatigue and Fracture B

ehavior of Environmental B

arrier Coating and SiC

-SiC C

eramic M

atrix Com

posite Systems: The R

ole of Environment Effects”, in

The 11th International C

onference on Ceram

ic Materials and C

omponents for E

nergy and Environm

ental Applications, V

ancouver, British C

olumbia, C

anada, June 15-19, 2015.

B

enchmark failure m

odes established in EB

C system

s, strong bond coat beneficial

Finite Elem

ent Analysis (FE

A) M

odeling

24

EBC

-CM

C Therm

al Gradient C

reep Rupture and

Delam

ination Modeling – B

ond Coat Stiffness Effect

─ A

dvanced EB

Cs designed w

ith higher strength and stiffness to improve

creep, fatigue, and cyclic durability

D. Zhu and L. G

hosn, “The Developm

ent of Environmental B

arrier Coating System

s for SiC-SiC

Ceram

ic Matrix C

omposites: Environm

ent Effects on the Creep and Fatigue R

esistance”, in A

erospace Coatings C

onference & E

xposition 2014: Developm

ent and Manufacturing T

rend for the 21st Century, H

artford, CT, U

SA, O

ctober 8, 2014

25

Fatigue Tests of Advanced RESi B

ond Coats and EB

C System

s -

AP

S and P

VD

processed 2700°F bond coats on CM

C: focus on fatigue testing at

temperatures 2400-2700°F

-E

BC

bond coats critical to prime-reliant coating system

designs Fatigue Tested

002_#17A

ir Plasm

a Sprayed A

PS

YSi+H

f-RE

Silicate 1316°C

, 10ksi, 1000 h fatigue (3 Hz, R

=0.05)

1169 h fatigue (3 Hz, R

=0.05) on GE

E

B-P

VD

HfR

E2 S

i2-x O7-x E

BC

/GdYbS

i(O) bond

Prepreg S

iC/S

iCcoat on C

VI-M

I SiC

/SiC

(with C

MA

S)

1537°C, 10ksi, 300 h fatigue (3 H

z, R=0.05)

EB

-PV

D R

E2 S

i2-x O7-x E

BC

/HfO

2 -Si bond coat on 3D

C

VI+PIP

SiC

/SiC

1482°C, 10ksi, S

PLC

F fatigue at 3 H

z, R=0.5 (300 h furnace tested, 500 h in laser

thermal gradient

Creep and Fatigue Test w

ith CM

AS

PV

D G

dYSi(O

) coated on Hyper Them

12C-461-

PV

D G

dYbSi(O

) bond coat,1316°C, 15ksi,

EB

C B

ond Coat series on R

oyce Royce H

TC

CV

I-MI S

iC/S

iC (w

ith CM

AS

) 1400°C

,at 10 ksi, 400 h

26

EBC

-CM

C Turbine Elem

ent Fatigue Testing

• Testing approaches developed for E

BC

-CM

C trailing edge therm

omechanical testing

• H

igh heat flux capability to simulate required high therm

al gradients and more com

plextem

perature distributions in a turbine engine•

Mechanical loading to sim

ulate the high pressure turbine airfoil pressure (ballooning) effects•

EB

C-C

MC

durability being evaluated, planned incorporation of stream jet environm

ents

Maxim

um P

rincipal Strain vs. A

irfoil Internal Pressure

EB

C coated Trailing E

dge (TE)

“wedge” testing in high heat flux and

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0.22

0.24

0.26

0.28

0.30

0 20

40 60

80 100

120 140

160 180

Maxium Principal Strain (%)

Internal Pressure (psi)

mechanical fatigue loading

Modeled testing /

27

Strains Measurem

ents for Coated A

irfoil Trailing Edge Subelem

ents at High Loads

-The results show

ed complex coating cycling behavior, and out of phase strain cycles

also on the EB

C coated sides

-P

ossibly changed neutral axes of the deflections of the CM

C thin and thick w

alls -

Challenges for m

odeling along with therm

al in-phase and out-phase loading

28

Load, N

SiC/SiC

Turbine Airfoil Trailing Edge Tests

-S

ubelement w

edge testing and high temperature tests, aim

ing at understanding the C

MC

and EB

C degradation

MI S

iC/S

iC C

MC

2000

TEST_HT

DAM

AGE m

odel TEST_H

T

00.00 0.05

0.10 0.15

0.20 0.25

0.30 0.35

Displacements, m

m

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

TEST DAM

AGE m

odel

Von Mises

Stress Plot

4000 CV

I SiC

/SiC

CM

C

30003000

Load, N

No reduction 2000

1000 Subelem

ent Load-Displacem

ent curve – P

repreg MI C

MC

trailing edge

0-0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6

Displacem

ents, mm

A

dvanced EB

C coated vanes tests

Subelem

ent Load-Displacem

ent curve – CV

I CM

C trailing edge

29

1000

Summ

ary •

Prime-R

eliant and durable EBC

s are critical to emerging SiC

/SiC C

MC

Hot-Section

component technologies

The EB

C developm

ent built on a solid foundation from past experience, evolved w

ith the current state of the art com

positions with higher tem

perature capabilities and stabilities •

Multicom

ponent EB

C oxide-doped silicates show

ed promise w

ith improved

stabilities, strength and toughness, and durability in various tests •

HfO

2 -Si and R

E-S

i bond coats, along with R

ES

iHfC

N potentially for realizing prim

e-reliant E

BC

-designs •

Advanced testing help scale-up for com

ponents and EV

C-C

MC

modeling

Current em

phases and future paths: ─

B

etter understanding of the coating failure mechanism

s, and helping develop coating property databases and validate life m

odels, aiming at m

ore robust EB

C-C

MC

designs ─

C

ontinue to focus on coating composition and processing im

provements, sim

ulated engine environm

ent testing and performance m

odeling ─

D

esign high strength, strain tolerant, CM

AS

resistant top coat; and dense, low diffusion

and high toughness EB

C and bond coats

Self-repairing and/or self-grow

ing of slow grow

th adherent EB

C coatings, m

inimizing

silica separation

30

A

cknowledgem

ents •

The work w

as supported by NASA

Fundamental Aeronautics Program

(FAP) Transform

ational Tools and Technologies (TTT) Project

In particular, the contributions from the follow

ing:

NA

SA

EBC-C

MC

Team, In particular, Jim

DiC

arlo, Jim Sm

ialek, Dennis Fox, Bryan H

arder, Robert A

. Miller,

Janet Hurst, M

artha Jaskowiak, R

am B

hatt, Mike H

albig, Valerie Wiesner, N

ate Jacobson, Narottam

B

ansal, Francisco Sola-Lopez, and S

erene Farmer, (N

AS

A G

RC

)

Collaborators include:

Sulzer M

etco (US

) -Mitch D

orfman; C

his Dam

bra D

irected Vapor Technologies, International – Derek H

ass and Balvinder G

ogia P

raxair Surface Technologies – John A

nderson and Li Li S

outhwest R

esearch Institute – Ronghua W

ei (PV

D coating processing)

in supporting the coating processing

31