clear focus imaging et. al. v. flexcon company
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
1/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 44 Page ID #:10
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
2/44
2COMPLAINTFORPATENTINFRINGEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs Clear Focus Imaging, Inc. (Clear Focus) and Stephen G. Nelson
(Nelson), for their causes of action against Defendant FLEXcon, Company, Inc.
(FLEXcon), state and allege as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent lawsof the United States, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has jurisdiction ove
the subject matter of this action under Title 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).
2. Venue is proper in this Judicial District under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)-(c) and 1400(b).
PARTIES AND BACKGROUND
3. Clear Focus is a corporation duly organized in California, doingbusiness in and having its principal place of business at 60 Maxwell Court, Santa
Rosa, California 95401. Nelson is an Arizona resident and resides at 4819 E.
Calle Redonda, Phoenix, Arizona 85018.
4. Clear Focus manufactures and sells perforated, one-way visionproducts that are used for displaying images on one side of the one-way vision
product and are see-through when viewed from the opposite side. Clear Focus
manufactures both exterior mount and interior mount one-way vision products.
Clear Focus one-way vision products can be mounted on, for example,
windows of a bus or a store. Clear Focus products are marked with the patent
numbers under which they are made and comply with 35 U.S.C. 287(a).
5. Clear Focus owns or is the exclusive licensee of many patentsdirected to its one-way vision product technology. Included among these patents
are the three patents identified in Counts I, II and III herein. On information and
belief, FLEXcon has had actual notice of these patents since at least 2002.
Nelson is the owner of the patent identified in Count III.
6. Defendant FLEXcon is a corporation duly organized inMassachusetts, doing business in and having its principal place of business at 1
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 2 of 44 Page ID #:11
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
3/44
3COMPLAINTFORPATENTINFRINGEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FLEXcon Industrial Park, Spencer, Massachusetts 01562-2642. FLEXcon
advertises, markets and sells its infringing products throughout the United States
including California. It has a sales and distribution facility in this Judicial
District located at 12840 Reservoir Street, Chino, California 91710. Substantial
acts of infringement have occurred in this Judicial District. FLEXcon does not
have a registered agent for service of process in California. Pursuant to Rules
4(e)(1) and (h)(1)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Section
416.10(b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, service of process may be
made by serving Neil McDonough, President and CEO, FLEXcon Company,
Inc., 1 FLEXcon Industrial Park, Spencer, MA 01562-2642.
7. Defendant FLEXcon manufactures and sells perforated, see-throughinfringing window films, including SEETHRU-SIGN STSCF2, STSWBF2 and
STSWB7030 and STSWB7030T.
8. FLEXcons website, FLEXcon.com, promotes the use and sale of itsinfringing products. This is an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C.
285.
COUNT 1
Infrigement of U.S. Patent No. 5,609,938
9. Clear Focus realleges paragraphs 1 through 8, as though set forthhere.
10. On March 11, 1997, United States Letters Patent 5,609,938 (the938 patent), entitled Image Display Apparatus With Holes For Opposite Side
Viewing, was duly and legally issued to inventor Rodney M. Shields. Clear
Focus owns all right, title and interest in the 938 patent. A true and correct cop
of the 938 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
11. FLEXcon has directly, indirectly, contributorily, and/or byinducement infringed one or more claims of the 938 patent, including claim 1,
through its manufacture and sale of products, including SEETHRU-SIGN S
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 3 of 44 Page ID #:12
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
4/44
4COMPLAINTFORPATENTINFRINGEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STSCF2.
12. The infringement of the 938 patent by FLEXcon has injured ClearFocus in an amount to be determined at trial. Furthermore, by these acts,
FLEXcon has irreparably injured Clear Focus, and the injury will continue unles
the Court enjoins FLEXcon.
13. The infringement of the 938 patent by FLEXcon has injured ClearFocus in an amount to be determined at trial. Furthermore, by these acts,
FLEXcon has irreparably injured Clear Focus, and the injury will continue unles
the Court enjoins FLEXcon.
COUNT II
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,773,110
14. Clear Focus realleges paragraphs 1 through 13, as though set forthhere.
15. On June 30, 1998, United States Letters Patent 5,773,110 (the 110patent), entitled Window Painting Apparatus And Method, was duly and
legally issued to inventor Rodney M. Shields. Clear Focus owns all right, title and
interest in the 110 patent. A true and correct copy of the 110 patent is attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
16. FLEXcon has directly, indirectly, contributorily, and/or byinducement infringed one or more claims of the 110 patent, including claim 13,
through its manufacture and sale of products, including SEETHRU-SIGN
STSWBF2 and STSWBF7030.
17. The infringement of the 110 patent by FLEXcon has injured ClearFocus in an amount to be determined at trial. Furthermore, by these acts,
FLEXcon has irreparably injured Clear Focus, and the injury will continue unles
the Court enjoins FLEXcon.
18. On information and belief, FLEXcon has had actual knowledge ofthe 110 patent and has willfully infringed the patent by engaging in objectively
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 4 of 44 Page ID #:13
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
5/44
5COMPLAINTFORPATENTINFRINGEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
reckless conduct when it continued making and selling the infringing products in
the face of an objectively high risk that it was infringing Clear Focus valid 110
patent.
COUNT III
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,429
19. On July 10, 2001, United States Patent No. 6,258,429 (the 429Patent), entitled One-Way See-Thru Panel and method of Making Same, was
duly and legally issued to inventor Nelson, who is the owner of all right, title and
interest in the patent. Clear Focus is the exclusive licensee of this patent and has
the right to sue for infringement thereof. A true and correct copy of the 429
patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
20. FLEXcon has directly, indirectly, contributorily, and/or byinducement infringed one or more claims of the 429 patent, including claim 1,
by its manufacture and sale of products, including STSWB7030T.
21. The infringement of the 429 patent by FLEXcon has injured ClearFocus in an amount to be determined at trial. Furthermore, by these acts,
FLEXcon has irreparably injured Clear Focus, and the injury will continue unles
the Court enjoins FLEXcon.
22. On information and belief, FLEXcon has had actual knowledge ofthe 429 patent and has willfully infringed the patent by engaging in objectively
reckless conduct when it continued making and selling the infringing products in
the face of an objectively high risk that it was infringing Clear Focus valid 429
patent.PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Clear Focus and Nelson pray for judgment against
Defendant FLEXcon as follows:
1. For a declaration that FLEXcon has directly, indirectly, contributorilyand by inducement, infringed the 938 patent, the 110 patent and the 429 patent,
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 5 of 44 Page ID #:14
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
6/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 6 of 44 Page ID #:15
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
7/44
EXHIBIT A
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 7 of 44 Page ID #:16
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
8/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 8 of 44 Page ID #:17
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
9/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 9 of 44 Page ID #:18
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
10/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 10 of 44 Page ID #:1
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
11/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 11 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
12/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 12 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
13/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 13 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
14/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 14 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
15/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 15 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
16/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 16 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
17/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 17 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
18/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 18 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
19/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 19 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
20/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 20 of 44 Page ID #:2
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
21/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 21 of 44 Page ID #:3
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
22/44
EXHIBIT B
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 22 of 44 Page ID #:31
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
23/44Exhibit B
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 23 of 44 Page ID #:32
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
24/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 24 of 44 Page ID #:33
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
25/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 25 of 44 Page ID #:34
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
26/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 26 of 44 Page ID #:35
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
27/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 27 of 44 Page ID #:36
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
28/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 28 of 44 Page ID #:37
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
29/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 29 of 44 Page ID #:38
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
30/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 30 of 44 Page ID #:39
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
31/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 31 of 44 Page ID #:40
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
32/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 32 of 44 Page ID #:41
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
33/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 33 of 44 Page ID #:42
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
34/44
EXHIBIT C
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 34 of 44 Page ID #:43
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
35/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 35 of 44 Page ID #:4
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
36/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 36 of 44 Page ID #:4
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
37/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 37 of 44 Page ID #:4
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
38/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 38 of 44 Page ID #:4
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
39/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 39 of 44 Page ID #:4
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
40/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 40 of 44 Page ID #:49
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
41/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 41 of 44 Page ID #:50
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
42/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 42 of 44 Page ID #:51
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
43/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 43 of 44 Page ID #:52
-
7/31/2019 Clear Focus Imaging et. al. v. Flexcon Company
44/44
Case 5:12-cv-01372-DDP-OP Document 1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 44 of 44 Page ID #:53