clean air act (title 4) acid rain ©2002 dr. b. c. paul
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Clean Air Act (Title 4)Acid Rain
©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul
![Page 2: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Title 4 - Acid Rain
This is the one that has caused havoc in the coal industry
Environmentalists had insisted for years Acid Rain was destroying the environment– Study showed there was little acidification of
lakes and forests and that many acid producing pollutants were fertilizing forests
– Scientists were threatened if they didn’t change study
– Mike Riley held back report until after congress voted and had own “Exec summary” written
![Page 3: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Acid Rain Precursors
First pollutant focused on was Sulfur Dioxide
CAA made two major directional shifts from earlier Clean Air Acts (Started in 1973)– Previous acts focused on reducing SO2
emissions new source performance standards that required all new power plants to install scrubbers
![Page 4: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Scrubber Debate
Problem with previous laws was that much of the new power plant construction was in low sulfur coal areas - leaving major SOx emitter unaffected– One State Implementation Plan (Illinois) provided
waivers for new plants and provided offsets by forcing fuel switching in northern part of the state
• units at Baldwin and Newton were installed without scrubbers
![Page 5: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Scrubbers in New Law
Clear that Technology that had been forced by earlier CAA was not being effectively deployed producing big bills small results
Congress wanted deep cuts in SO2 emissions
One proposal called for collecting a tax off of coal plants and using the proceeds to install scrubbers on highest SO2 plants
![Page 6: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Scrubber Proposals
Big problem with the scrubber fund was it was Socialistic - everyone pays and a few collect - not consistent with free enterprise spirit
Second proposal was based on known fact that free markets always make wise and balanced long term decisions - Free Market proposal won in part defections Illinois reps
![Page 7: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Emissions Allowances
Law created a cap on total SO2 emissions and defined that tonnage by issuing tradable credit certificates– Anyone with a certificate had the right to dump a ton
of SO2 into the atmosphere
– Limited number of certificates would limit emissions
– Companies could buy and sell credits so market forces would determine how SO2 was cut
![Page 8: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Emissions Trading
No one was sure whether there would be enough interest to get brokerages and markets to implement a trading system– EPA held back 2.8% of the credits to set up an
EPA auction make sure that someone would go to the show
Emissions trading was implemented in two steps Phase I starting in 1995 and Phase II starting in 2000 (real Y2K bug?)
![Page 9: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Phase I
Had a limited application - Congress invited 110 coal fired utility boilers by name to come to their party– If you did not get an invitation - you were not
phase I effected– Only boilers invited to the party needed SO2
credits - also the only ones to receive credits
![Page 10: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
If Your Invited to the Party
Take average number of BTUs fired by your invited boilers during 1985, 1986 and 1987. This is your base
Divide number of BTUs by 1 million to get base number of million BTUs per year
Multiply the number you get by 2.5This is the base number of credits you get.
![Page 11: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Great Toga Party
Subtract 2.8% of your credits as your voluntary (that you don’t have a choice about) contribution to the EPA auction fund
Next politicians added extra credits to a few large selected Midwestern Utilities that owned Congressmen needed for the vote
Also earn extra credit for early compliance - if you get emissions down before the party you will get credits for reductions
![Page 12: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What to Do With Your Funny Money
Once you get one of your monopoly dollars you can– Hold it indefinitely (these little gems keep and
stay fresh)– You can have fun putting SO2 into the air and
give your certificate back to EPA to show you had their blessing
– You can go to market and sell the thing like stock
– You can go to market to buy more if you need them or want to speculate
![Page 13: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Y2K Bug - Phase II
All Utility Company Generators and anyone else who wants to request an invitation gets one
Your base credits are calculated based on average MBTU/year * 1.2
If you were less than 1.2 in 85 to 87 then you get your previous emission rate plus extra 20% for load growth
![Page 14: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Ratchet
Under Phase II only 10 million tons per year of new credits will be issued - EPA will make across the board cuts to ensure no more than 10 million tons of new issue credits– A more obscure clause tightens the total to 8.9
in 2010
![Page 15: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Title 4 Program may become irrelevant except for history
Dec 2003 Leavit proposed to govern Sox and Nox over most country with a clause about “good neighbor” SIPs under title I and using the opacity and vistas clauses for Great Smokey NP
Takes states from Missouri and Texas east and puts them in a separate cap and trade for 3.9 million tons of Sox and 1.6 million tons of Nox by 2010 (remember old number was 8.9 million tons SO2)
![Page 16: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Leavit Proposal
SO2 allocated based on 1985-1987 Btu firings as percent of total– If you didn’t have any have to buy credits
NOx allocated based on 1999-2002 Btu firings * 0.11 lbs/MMBTU
Require States to retire extra Title 4 credits so they won’t go to the west
2015 ratchet down to 2.7 million tons SO2, 1.3 million tons Nox
![Page 17: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Compliance with Clean Air Act
Original intent of Title 4 cap and trade was to allow industry to choose most economic way to get reduction– Could switch coals (about $45 to $112/kw –
expect about $87/kw)• Low sulfur PRB coal generally work with
credits low enough– Could scrub (about $110/kw for wet, $90/kw
for dry – costs about $90/ton to remove sulfur – credits sell for about $80 to $120/ton)
– Could buy credits
![Page 18: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
More Compliance Options
Ways to get Title 4 Reductions– Could switch from coal to gas (go from 70% marginal
cost for fuel and $1.05/MMBTU to $3.25 to $6.50 with 90% of marginal cost for fuel – about $100 to $750/kw)
– Could Repower such as changing to FBC or IGCC (about $750 to $1500/kw)
– Could super clean the coal but costs about $300/ton SO2 and high sulfur coals would not clean down without risky chemical cleaning
– Could buy Power• Merchant Plants• Coal by Wire Concept
![Page 19: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Methods of Choice
Fuel switch enough stations to buy and sell credits to rest
Few power companies with experience went for scrubbers and could recoup their costs off of credit sales– Couple repowered to FBC
Some (Commonwealth Edison) went out of generation business
In general the watch word was minimize capital expenditures on new technology
![Page 20: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Nox Control Methods
Nitrogen Oxides from two sources– Fuel based (nitrogen in fuel oxidizes most
fuels have minimal nitrogen)– Atmospheric (nitrogen and oxygen in
atmosphere will react at high temperature – up around 3,000 F)
Agency had till 1997 to develop regulation– Most looked like a command and control
method– Basis was prevention of Nox formation
![Page 21: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Stoping Nox
Big problem was hot spots in boiler– Low Nox burners for avoiding hot spots– Slight operating temperature reductions
• Does hurt both heat transfer and combustion efficiency• Raises carbon in ash and hurts ash marketability
– Maintaining reducing zones in boilers to break Nox (also things don’t burn well in them)
• Gas reburn above coal fire
Technologies got Nox down from 1.6 to 3 lbs/MMBTU to the 0.6 to 0.9 lbs/MMBTU range
![Page 22: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Title I Non-Compliance Complications
North East Complaints that non-compliance was from somewhere else– Nox a major ozone precurser– Local areas had seasonal Nox problems– Looked like some of this stuff could be associated
with emerging PM 2.5 regsNeed to actually destroy Nox in emissions
– Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)• Inject ammonia with a recycled catalyst
– Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction• Ammonia without catalyst
![Page 23: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The SIP Call
EPA tried to declare State Plans inadequate under “good neighbor” language– Tried developing a cap and trade plan for Nox– Challenged in Court – 1999 to 2002 for
decisionLeavit’s Cap and Trade Nox program of
Dec 2003– Will create a cap and trade zone across half
country
![Page 24: Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5519949255034648068b4760/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Nox Compliance
SCRs generally reduce into the 0.15 to .05 lb/MMBTU range– Agency set 0.11 as level for allocation– Allows deeper clean of larger plants without
having to buy equipment for little minor plants• The Illinois dilemma