clastic sedimentology and petrography_deltas - qab2023
TRANSCRIPT
1
Deltas
AP Dr. David MENIERUniversiti Teknologi PETRONAS
2
Delta Sedimentary Environments
Why study ancient and present deltas ? Components of a delta Process of formation of a delta Delta classification Fluvial-dominated delta Mixed fluvial to wave-dominated Tide-dominated delta Wave-dominated delta
http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/places/regions-places/africa-tc/botswana_okavangodelta/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adHiQ6Dn8DI
Why study ancient deltas ? Most described ancient deltaic sequences are river-
dominated systems (that are characterized by major coarsening-upward sequences many 10’s m thick, from marine sediments “perhaps limestones” passing up into increasingly non-marine mudrocks - sandstones and then coals).
The deltaic sediments of the Carboniferous strata in W. Europe and E. USA are good examples contain important coal reserves.
The repetition of deltaic cycles in the Carboniferous may be due to: (a) compaction-induced subsidence, (b) tectonic subsidence, or (c) eustatic sea-level changes.
Deltaic sandstones are major oil reservoirs in some basins e.g. (1) the Middle Jurassic Brent Sands of the North Sea.(2) the Tertiary of the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana.
4
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/earthmatters/category/uncategorized/page/5/
5
Northeast Holden Crater on Mars—10-m resolution DEM of the Eberswalde Delta.Reds are topographic highs, and darker colors are topographic lows. The delta relief is about 60/80 m.To assist in interpretation, this image was generated by hand contouring of color satellite images guided by low-resolution altimetry dataand higher-resolution altimetry of Aharonson and Lewis (CalTech).
Deltas of the SE Asia, modified after Woodroffe 2000
From Ali Wahid, PhD
BORNEO
0 600
kilometres
Sulu Sea
Sandakan Delta
Rajang Delta
Tarakan Delta
Mahakam Delta
Baram Delta
Sabah Delta
Balingian Delta
Barito Delta
Deltas around Borneo island
Deltas of the SE Asia, modified after Woodroffe 2000
8
From Ali Wahid, PhD
9
Components of a delta modified from Coleman & Wright, (1971)
An active delta consists of one or more river-mouth systems to which prodelta and delta front deposition are directly coupled, a distrubutary network, interdistributary and distrubutary-margin deposits, and a delta shoreline
Subaqueous component
EaES 350-9 10
Deltaic environments
Deltaic environments
Deltas form where a river enters into a standing body of water (ocean, sea, lake) and forms a thick deposit that may or may not form protuberances
The delta plain is the subaerial part of a delta (gradational upstream to a floodplain); the delta front (delta slope and prodelta) is the subaqueous component
Delta plains are commonly characterized by distributaries and flood basins (upper delta plain) or interdistributary bays (lower delta plain), as well as numerous crevasses plays
Upper delta plains contain facies assemblages that are very similar to fluvial settings
11
Process of formation of a delta
Deltas develop where river systems debouch into the ocean, inland seas and lakes.
Their form is controlled by a number of factors, chief of which is the relative effectiveness of river discharge compared to the tidal and wave energies of the receiving basin.
- Sediment input- Wave energy-Tidal energy
12
Process of formation of a delta
When a stream flows into a large standing body of water, such as a lake, the stream water quickly loses velocity and the heaviest particles drop out, forming a coarse, steeply sloping layer.
Most of the fine suspended load is carried farther out, eventually settling out to form a gently sloping, triangular deposit.
13
Delta classification based on the dominant process
Schematic illustration of the construction of a delta body
Bottomset beds Foreset beds topset beds
Deltagrowth
Sea level
According to classical concept, a delta is made up of topset, foreset and bottomset deposits
15
Seaward progradation of a depositional environments after Scruton, (1960).
During the grouwth of a delta, different environments migrate toward the sea
Seaward
Marsh
Delta frontSilt & Sand
Prodelta silty clay
Offshore clay
Original depositional surface
Time lines
Depositional surface
16
3D View : Carboniferous Delta (U.S.A), in Elliot & Reading., 1986.
Channels
Active prograding delta
Abandoned delta
17
Cross section illustrating sedimentary facies of Deltaic and Front delta
18
Delta top facies to Marine shelf deposits
19
Deposits geometry in function of depth basins
20
Sketch graphic log and interpretation of typical sequence produced by delta prograding
21
Fluvial-Dominated bird foot delta
Mississippi River (U.S.A)
22
Fluvial-Dominated bird foot delta
Levees
Delta(distribury)
channel
Inter-distributary bay
River channel
23
Tide-dominated delta
Norman River (Australia)
24
Physical characteristics of a tide-dominated delta
Tide-dominated deltas are characterised by relatively high tide energy at the mouth compared with wave energy, and are distinguished from tide-dominated estuaries by high river energy.
Tidal energy is greatest slightly landward of the mouth due to constriction by the funnel shaped mouth.
Wave energy is dissipated on shoals seaward of the mouth, and declines rapidly landwards.
River energy remains moderate to high along the channel, but drops off significantly as the channel widens towards the mouth.
25
Wave-dominated delta (cuspate)
Nil River (Egypt)
26
Physical characteristics of wave-dominated deltas
Wave-dominated deltas are characterised by relative high wave energy at the mouth compared to tide energy, and are distinguished from wave-dominated estuaries by high river energy.
Total energy at the mouth is high because of high wave energy at the coast.
Total energy declines immediately landward of the mouth because wave energy is dissipated on the barrier. The dominance of river energy further landward means total energy is relatively high along the channel.
Maximum tidal energy occurs in the constricted inlet mouth.
27
Mixed Tide-Dominated delta
Mahakam delta (Indonesia)
28
A schematic representation of pre-Holocene and Holocene Mahakam stratigraphy (modified after Roberts and Sydow, 2003) with MISEDOR core (Carbonel and Moyes, 1987) location and main time and depth boundaries of important Pleistocene and Holocene surfaces. In the offshore zone several carbonate bioherm structures are situated, which are remains of the late Pleistocene–early Holocene transgressive phase.
From Storm et al; (2005). Sedimentary geology
29
Fluvial dominatedbird-foot delta (elongate)
Mixed Fluvial dominated« classical » delta +/- tidal influence
Wave-dominated delta (cupside) Tide-dominated delta
30
Mississippi River
http://www.pnronline.com.au/article.php/108/1963
EaES 350-9 31
Conclusion : Delta morphology
Deltaic environments
Delta morphology reflects the relative importance of fluvial, tidal, and wave processes, as well as gradient and sediment supply
• River-dominated deltas occur in microtidal settings with limited wave energy, where delta-lobe progradation is significant and redistribution of mouth bars is limited
• Wave-dominated deltas are characterized by mouth bars reworked into shore-parallel sand bodies and beaches
• Tide-dominated deltas exhibit tidal mudflats and mouth bars that are reworked into elongate sand bodies perpendicular to the shoreline
32
Deltaic environments
Mouth bars form at the upper edge of the delta front, at the mouth of distributaries; they are mostly sandy and tend to coarsen upwards
The delta slope is commonly 1-2° and consists of finer (usually silty) facies; the most distal prodelta is dominated by even finer sediment
Progradation (basinward building) of deltas leads to coarsening-upward successions, and progradation rates depend on sediment supply and basin bathymetry (water depth)
33
Deltaic environments
Deltaic environments
Coarse-grained deltas are composed of gravelly facies and form where alluvial fans or relatively steep braided rivers enter a water body
Delta cycles are the result of repetitive switching of delta lobes, comparable to avulsion in fluvial environments; this leads to characteristic vertical successions with progradational facies and transgressive facies
34
Thank you for the attention