civic activism is reconstructing the society · e.g. social media group, meet-up practice, project,...
TRANSCRIPT
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
CIVIC ACTIVISM IS RECONSTRUCTING THE
SOCIETY Tools for discussing self-organizing cities
YIMBYcon, Helsinki, August 12, 2016
Maija Faehnle & Pasi Mäenpää University of Helsinki, Department of Social Research and Finnish Environment Institute SYKE
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
ACTIVISM ON THE RISE
• Digitalization has brought people multiple opportunities to start developing their societies directly by themselves
• Change in agency: actor networks, sharing, recycling, collaborative consumption, start-up spirit, social enterprises, disappointment with representative democracy
2
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
THREE VISIONS
• Relationship between citizens and the government is changing • Citizens take tasks the government has traditionally taken care of
• Markets and the economy are changing • Sharing/civic/platform economy: production and distribution of
goods and services are changing • P2P services, co-owning, crowdfunding, alternative currencies…
• Power relations and the structure of the society are changing • Co-governance, shared regulation • Government as a partner, facilitator, or one who stays away
3
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
(URBAN) CIVIC ACTIVISM
• Self-organized, proactive and constructive co-action, typically outside of formal NGOs
• Primarily DIY-action instead of orienting towards decision making system or political engagement ‒ ’Let’s just do it!’ attitude (Pulkkinen 2014)
• Based on networking in social media and internet solutions • People-driven bottom-up urbanism; takes place in urban space
or is related to cities and urban life
4
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
WHICH TERMS TO USE? DEPENDS ON CONTEXT
• ’Urban activism’ – in literature often refers to movements oriented to the decision-making system, though diversity of activisms recognized (e.g. Jacobsson 2015)
• ’Activist’ – sounds negative for some, ”a bit like terrorist”. Those you call activists don’t necessarily regard themselves as activists
• ’YIMBY activist’ – more clearly positive term for those who know what YIMBY means, unclear for the others
• ’Urban change agents’ – can refer to many other actors/roles: citizens but also networks, officials, funders, enterprises, NGOs, other organizations…
5
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
ON THE PROJECT
• ’Civic activism as resource for the metropolis’, 2015−2016/2017 • How does civic activism contribute to the development of cities?
How could cities and state organizations utilise and support it? • Focus on ecological sustainability, local innovations, local
communities and involvement • Advocative action research: working together with activists and
authorities by identifying and solving their problems • Partners: Cities of Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa, and Lahti; Ministries of Environment, Finance, and Justice; The
Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities, The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland, Finnish Environment Institute
• Funding: Helsinki Metropolitan Region Urban Research Program, The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland, The Finnish Cultural Foundation/Uusimaa Regional fund, The Fund of Heikki von Hertzen
6
CLASSIFYING CIVIC ACTIVISM
Services of sharing/civic/platform economy • P2P commerce, alternative food networks, peer renting, time banking,
other P2P services Activism focused on community • Open events, local movements, social support, improving public services,
ecological movements Shaping urban space • Urban planning groups, squatting, opening and shaping buildings or
spaces, artivism Activism developing the use of technology • Hacktivism (civic apps, improving data systems and datasets…),
developing information society (enhancing openness, digital currencies…) Activism supporting other activisms • Innovation and mediator communities, developing tools for activism,
communication encouraging activism (subvertising…) 7
Activisms can be characterized as having qualities from one or more of the following five themes/classes:
Mäenpää et al., forthcoming
Sharing economy Urban space
Community
Technology
SELF-ORGANIZED
CITY
Open events
Local movements
Urban planning groups
Innovation and mediator communities
Social support
Squatting, opening,
shaping spaces Artivism
P2P commerce
etc.
Hacktivism
Developing Information
society
Improving public services
Developing tools for activism
Ecological movements
Commu-nication
encouraging activism
Support
Green: activism types that especially can make sense for enhancing ecological sustainablity Mäenpää et al., forthcoming
Alternative food
networks etc.
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
A SYSTEM LEVEL VIEW: RISE OF THE 4TH SECTOR
• NGOs (the third sector) still important, but nowadays much of all civic action organized in other ways
• The non-NGO-based civic actors worth recognizing as the fourth sector
• But any actor can have fourth sector type of action • Increase of fourth sector type of action can be seen as
supplementing democracy with do-ocracy Do-ocracy: if you have an idea, you do it http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_30028751/yimby-conference-brings-activists-from-around-nation-boulder https://communitywiki.org/wiki/DoOcracy
9
CITIZENS
PUBLIC SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
THIRD SECTOR
FOURTH SECTOR
activism arises
e.g. social media group, meet-up practice, project, cooperative
influencing goals and practices, using an NGO for appyling for funding, establishing a new NGO, competing on agency
being a customer, establishing a start-up, micro or social enterprise, influencing markets
asking for information, applying for permits and grants, influencing and challenging ways to act
• Organization: NGO • Social media as extra • Influencing: through official
planning and decision-making
• Meetings, statements • Power to influence • Partnership with city • Representativeness • Continuity • Promotion of interests • Controlled development • Also counteraction, NIMBY
• Organization: for example social media group only
• Social media essential • Influencing: hacker attitude • Events, action, DIY • Sense of community • Networking, enterprises etc. • Openness, sharing • Visibility • Momentariness • Creation of new • Proactivity, YIMBY
Stereotypes of civic action Traditional NGO type:
3rd sector New activism type: 4th sector
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
FORTHCOMING 2016−2017
• Databank on urban civic activism: case stories, typology, terminology, tools, information sources
• Recommendations for city governments on adapting their practices to the rise of civic activism
• Wallhanging for civic and government actors • Ground for a meeting practice for actors interested in activism • Publications e.g. articles in Kvartti • Contributing to making cities agile in collaboration with the
’Dwellers in agile cities’ project* e.g. extending the databank with international examples on people-driven solutions for housing, living and working
12 *University of Tampere / Academy of Finland 2016-2018
LET’S KEEP IN TOUCH!
kaupunkiaktivismi.wordpress.com/in-english Facebook: Kaupunkiaktivismi Pasi Mäenpää [email protected] Maija Faehnle [email protected] @maija_f agilecities.fi/en @agile_dwellers
Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta
FURTHER READING
• Balaram, B. 2016. Fair Share - Reclaiming power in the sharing economy. RSA & Innovate UK. https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/fair-share-reclaiming-power-in-the-sharing-economy
• Donovan, F. 2014. DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7:4, 381–398.
• Jacobsson, K. 2015. Urban grassroots movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Ashgate.
• Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M., Ewans-Cowley, J. 2015. Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance. Planning, Practice & Research 30:3, 237–247.
• Pulkkinen, K. 2014. A bottom-up way of building a system and changing perceptions – urban pioneers as a model for transformation for sustainability. Systema 2:2. http://www.systema-journal.org/article/view/275
• Ramos, J.M. (ed.) 2016. The City as Commons: A Policy Reader. Commons Transition Coalition, Melbourne, Australia.
14
THANK YOU!