city of law department farrell - aclu.org€¦ · case 1:13-cv-03448-pkc-jma document 91 filed...

26
ZACHÀRYW. CARTER Corporation Counsel THE CITY OF NEW YORK LAW DEPARTMENT IOO CHURCH STREET NEW YORK, NY IOOOT Peter G. Farrell Senior Counsel Tel (212)3s6-3532 Fax: (212) 356-3509 August 15,2014 Bv Email and Reeular Mail Honorable Charles S. Haight, Jr. Senior United States District Judge United States District Court 141 Church Street New Haven, CT 06510 Bv ECF Honorable Joan M. Azrack United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Eastern District of New York 225 CadmanPlazaBast Brooklyn, New York 11201 R:e: Høndschu v, Specíal Services,Tl Civ.2203 (CSH) Raza v. City of New York 13 Civ. 3448 (PKC) (JMA) Dear Judge Haight and Judge Azrack: Defendants write on behalf of all parties in the above two cases. We write to advise that counsel for the parties have met together on two occasions and have agreed to attempt to consensually resolve the pending disputes (hereinafter the "Settlement Process"). In order to facilitate the Settlement Process, we write to respectfully request that each of you order the provisions set forth below. As the Courts are aware, while each of these cases is based on unique facts and arguments, there are also some common underlying issues between them. Each involves a claim that the NYPD's Intelligence Bureau is conducting investigations of Muslims based upon religion. In Handschu, class counsel claim that the investigations violate the Handschu Guidelines, while in Raza the plaintifß claim the investigations violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

ZACHÀRYW. CARTERCorporation Counsel

THE CITY OF NEW YORK

LAW DEPARTMENTIOO CHURCH STREET

NEW YORK, NY IOOOT

Peter G. FarrellSenior Counsel

Tel (212)3s6-3532Fax: (212) 356-3509

August 15,2014

Bv Email and Reeular MailHonorable Charles S. Haight, Jr.

Senior United States District JudgeUnited States District Court141 Church StreetNew Haven, CT 06510

Bv ECFHonorable Joan M. AzrackUnited States Magistrate JudgeUnited States District CourtEastern District of New York225 CadmanPlazaBastBrooklyn, New York 11201

R:e: Høndschu v, Specíal Services,Tl Civ.2203 (CSH)Raza v. City of New York 13 Civ. 3448 (PKC) (JMA)

Dear Judge Haight and Judge Azrack:

Defendants write on behalf of all parties in the above two cases. We write to advise thatcounsel for the parties have met together on two occasions and have agreed to attempt toconsensually resolve the pending disputes (hereinafter the "Settlement Process"). In order tofacilitate the Settlement Process, we write to respectfully request that each of you order the

provisions set forth below.

As the Courts are aware, while each of these cases is based on unique facts and

arguments, there are also some common underlying issues between them. Each involves a claimthat the NYPD's Intelligence Bureau is conducting investigations of Muslims based uponreligion. In Handschu, class counsel claim that the investigations violate the Handschu

Guidelines, while in Raza the plaintifß claim the investigations violate the First and FourteenthAmendments.

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973

Page 2: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

In order to facilitate the Settlement Process, the defendants have agreed to allow cross

disclosure between class counsel in Handschu and counsel in Raza of investigative statements

made available in the respective actions. This cross disclosure will allow counsel in each case to

examine a common set of documents and provide for a common basis for discussion. Moreover,

additional information is contemplated to be exchanged between the parties.

To facilitate this exchange of information, the parties respectfully request the Courts inboth cases order the following agreements which shall apply to any and all disclosures

(documents, presentations, conversations, interviews, etc,) made during the Settlement Process.

Handschu and Raza

1) Paul Chevigny, Jethro Eisenstein, Franklin Siegel, Martin Stolar, and ArthurEisenberg (collectively, "Handschu Class Counsel") shall be treated as

"Plaintiffs Counsel" as defined in Section I(E) of the Stipulation and ProtectiveOrder for the Production and Exchange of Confidential Materials, dated March20,2014 previously entered in Raza (the "Raza Protective Order") (Attached

as Exhibit A). Sections III, V, VI, and VII of the Raza Protective Order shallapply to Handschu Class Counsel. No other provisions of the Raza ProtectiveOrder shall apply to Handschu Class Counsel.

Hina Shamsi, Patrick Toomey, Ashley Gorski, Arthur Eisenberg, BethHaroules, Ramzi Kassem, Diala Shamas, Hector Gallegos, and Adam Hunt(collectively, "Raza Counsel") shall be subject to the Memo Endorsed Letterdated March 14, 2014 (endorsed March 17, 2014) entered in Handschu(Attached as Exhibit B).

3) If the Settlement Process ends unsuccessfully or the stay proposed in fl5 belowceases: (i) the cross disclosure permitted under flfl 1 and 2 above shall cease;

(ii) Handschu Class Counsel shall no longer be treated as "Plaintiffs Counsel"as defined in Section I(E) of the Raza Protective Order and shall not have

access to information produced in Ptaza; (iii) Raza Counsel shall not have

access to information produced under the March 17, 2014 endorsed order inHandschu; and (iv) all other protections including those prohibiting disclosurewill remain in effect.

4) All information disclosed during the Settlement Process, including but notlimited to documents, presentations, conversations or interviews: (i) shall notbe admissible to prove liability for or invalidity of a claim; and (ii) shall remainconfidential, privileged, inadmissible and shall not be used in any subsequentproceeding, including as a basis for impeachment of any witness, except as set

forth in this paragraph. The parties rcalize that facts once learned cannot be

unlearned. If the Settlement Process ends unsuccessfully and litigation isresumed, all parties retain the right to continue discovery pursuant to Rule 26

et seq,, and to seek disclosure of all appropriate information including

2)

a

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 2 of 26 PageID #: 1974

Page 3: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

documents that have been seen except that no party may cite to or invokeinformation disclosed during the Settlement Process as a basis for seeking Rule26 disclosures unless the request for information can be justified upon some

other ground. In response to any request for disclosure under Rule 26, the

parties reserve the right to invoke any objection, privilege or prior court rulingas a basis for refusing to disclose such documents or statements and forasserting the confidentiality of such documents or statements. In the event thatthe Settlement Process ends unsuccessfully, nothing in this paragraph shall

prevent any party from seeking disclosure of documents or information underRule 26 et seq. that were created or that originated before or after the

unsuccessful close of the Settlement Process.

s) Discovery and all proceedings in each case shall be stayed upon endorsement

or "so-ordering" of these provisions by each court. All due dates shall be tolledfor a period of 45 days from the date both Courts so order the provisions set

forth herein. In the event that any party concludes that the Settlement Process

is futile, the stay and tolling can be terminated with written notice to the otherparties and the Court.

The stay requested in fl5 above is requested to permit the parties to focus their efforts and

time on the Settlement Process. The parties respectfully request that the Courts endorse or "so

order" the above provisions.

submitted,

Peter arrellSenior Counsel

cc The Honorable Pamela K. Chen (by ECF)Handschu Class Counsel. (by email)Plaintiffs' Counsel in Raza (by ECF and email)

-J-

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 3 of 26 PageID #: 1975

Page 4: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Exhibit A

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 4 of 26 PageID #: 1976

Page 5: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

C*se L:I3-t:v^ü34¿18 PKC-JMA Docume nt {'14 F:ilad ü7l22lt¡1 traE* L ui 19 tragelD Nt,'. 1,fr85

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

HAMID HASSAN RAZA;MASJID AL.ANSAR; ASAD DANDIA; MUSLIMSGIVING BACK; MASJID AT-TAQWA;MOHAMMAD ELSHINAV/Y,

Plaintiffs,

No, l3-CV-03448 (PKc) (JMA)

FIRST AMENDED STIPULATIONAND PROTECTIVE ORDER FORTHE PRODUCTION ANDEXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIALMATERIALS

Defendants

WHEREAS, the parties intend to produce certain documents or disclose certain

information pursuant to Rules 26,33, and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that they

deem to be confidentiat or otherwise inappropriate for public disclosure; and

WHEREAS, the parties will only produoe these documents if appropriate

protection for their confidentiality is assured;

NO\ry, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED' bY

and between the Parties, as follows:

L DEFINITIONS

A. ,.Action,, shall mean the case of Raz? v. city of New York, l3 cv 3448 (PKC)

JMA), pending in the Easter District of New York'

v

CITY OF NEW YORK; MICHAEL R.BLOOMBERG, in his officialcapacity asMayor of the City of New York; RAYMONDW. KELLY, in his official capacity as PoliceCommissioner for the City of New York;DAVID COHEN, in his oflicial capacity as

Depufy Commissioner of Intelligence for theCity of New York,

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 5 of 26 PageID #: 1977

Page 6: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Case i-:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Dncur"nenT tJ4 Filr:d *7t22lItI Page 2 of 1-9 Pagel? lN'. lti1ß

B' ' Ú(Protected Material" shall mean information designated pursuant to the

procedures set forth in section II, If the Protected Materiat is a document, any metadata

associated with that document shail be considered protected Materiar as weil,

c' 'rPlaintiffs" shall mean, for the purposes of this stipulation: (i) Hamid Hassan

Raza; (ii) for Masjid Al-Ansar, Hamid Hassan Raza and Mohsin Raza; (iii) Asad Dandia; (iv) for

Muslims Giving Back, Asad Dandia, Mohamed Bahi, and Mohammad Mohammad; (v) for

Masjid At-Taqwa, Imam Siraj Wahhaj, Imam Osman Adam, and AliAbdul Karim; and (ví)

Mohammad Elshinawy, Plaintifß' Counsel may seek to allow additional cunent or former board

members of Masjid Al-Ansar, Muslims Giving Back, and Masjid At-Taqwa to view Confidential

Material if such persons have relevant information concerning the documents or their contents.

If so, Plaintiffs' Counsel shall inform Defense Counsel of the name of the person they seek to

add and Defense Counsel shall respond with their agreement or disagreement within one

business day, If the parties cannot agree, Plaintiffs' Counsel may make an ex parte application to

the court. Defense Counsel may also file any objections ex parte.

D. ..I)efendants" shatl mean: (i) Michael Bloomberg, Raymond Kelly, and David

Cohen, in their official capacities, and their successors-in-interest; and (ii) current or former

employees of the New York city Police Department ("NYPD") not including former

confidential informants or similar agents, whose assistance or participation is necessary for the

defense ofthis action.

E. .,Plaintiffst counselt'shallmean attorneys of record appearing on behalf of any

named plaintiff in this action who: (i) are signatories to this stipulation and order; or (ii) have

signed,,Exhibit A" hereto, which will be maintained in the off¡ces of Plaintiffs' Counsel'

2

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 6 of 26 PageID #: 1978

Page 7: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

C'¿ty¡* L'.I?-r:¡^{}3t+4t3-V KC-.lMA DocrrrnenÏ 84 f:ilrul 0712-.2114 ?aç¿* 3 çî L9 ?artt:lD it'. L687

x" r.Defense counsel" shallmean (i) attorneys of record appearing on behalf of anynamed defendant to this action who are signatories to this stipuration and order; (ii) attorneys ofrecord appearing on behalf of any named defendant to this action who have signed ,,Exhib¡t

A,,

hereto, which will be maintained in the offices of Defense counsel; and (iii) attorneys employed

by the New York city Police Department who are duly admitted to the practice of law in the

State of New York, who are providing legalcounsel in this action, and who have signed

"Exhibit A" hereto, which will be maintained in the offices of Defense counser.

G. "Plaintiffs' Designated Support Staff' shall mean up to l3 full-time employees

of the American Civil Liberties Union, the New York Civil Liberties Union, CLEAR project,

and/or Monison & Foerster LLP who: (i) have been designated by Plaintifß' counsel; and (ii)

have signed "Exhibit A" hereto, which will be maintained in the ofïices of Plaintiffs' oounsel

"Plaintiffs' Designated support Staff'does not include law student interns with the CLEAR

project, nor any other intern, extern, or other part-time employee' oopies of "Exhibit A" signed

by plaintiffs'Designated Support Staff and the date of birth of each of Plaintiffs' Designated

Support Staff shall be provided to Defense Counset 5 days prior to Plaintiffs' Designated

Support staff accessing any Protected Material. Defendants are permitted to perform

background checks on alt of Plaintiffs' Designated support staff prior to them aocessing any

Protected Material,

H...Defendants'DesignatedsupportStaff'shallmeanfull-timeemployees

working on beharf of the New york city Law Department and full-time employees of the NYPD

whoprovidelegalsupportserviceswho:(1)havebeendesignatedbyDefenseCounsel;

and(2)havesigned..ExhibitA,,hergto,whichwillbemaintainedintheofTicesofDefense

3

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 7 of 26 PageID #: 1979

Page 8: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Casr¡ L:L3-cv^{}344t1-PKC-JMA Dccr¡rnenl S4 Filed û7t221L4 Ptsgx 4 al I9 FaçalD it'. 1"6til1

counsel' Defense counsel shall disclose the identity and number of their Designated supportStaff to Plaintifß' Counsel.

I' 'rProducing Party" shall mean a party disclosing material pursuant to itsobligations under Fed. R, Civ. p, Rules 26,33, or 34,

J' r'Receiving Party" shall mean a partyobtaining materiar from the producingParty in fr¡ftherance of prosecuting or defending this Action on beharf of any named parfythereto.

K. 'rDate of production,'shat mean the date (i) on which the producin gpafty

makes the material available for inspection by the Receiving parry; or (ii) produces the material

to the Receiving parry.

L' r'I)ate of Notification" shall mean the date on which the Receiving party serves

the Producin gParty with written notice that it intends to dispute the producing party,s

designation of materiá1,

M. íOffering Party" shall mean the party intending to offer an expert as

contemplated by Fed, R, Civ. P. Rule 26.

N. '(Metadata" is data stored electronically that describes characteristics of

electronic documents other than their content, For the purposes of this protective order, Metadata

is defined as: Author; From;To; CC; BCC; Subject; Email Subject; Date Sent; Time Sent; Date

Created;Time Created; Date Received;Time Received; File Name; File Path; File Size;

Application; Doc Extension; HASH; Header; Attachment; and Encryption'

U. DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL AND RESOLUTION OF

DISPUTES

A. Defendants may designate Protected Material: (l) "lnspection only";(2)

"Attorneys Eyes Only"; or (3) "Confidential"'

4

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 8 of 26 PageID #: 1980

Page 9: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Case L',L3-t:y-ü:344{l-PL.,C-JNiA Dr¡curnent B4 l:àled 0/ 12".2.1}.4 PaEo 5 at L9 ?aç*1ü it: L68l}

B.

"Confidential.

c. Notes Based on proúected Material

(l) Any notes generated by the Receiving parfy during the review of materialdesignated "lnspection only" or "Attomeys Eyes only" by the producing party shall be deemed

"Attorneys Eyes Only,"

(2) Any notes generated by the Rece iving Parfy during the review of material

designated "Confidential" by the Producing Party shall be deemed ,,Confidential.,,

D. The Receiving Parfy may dispute the Producing Party's designation of material by

notiffing the Producing Parfy within 25 business days of the Date of Production. The parties

must meet and confer within 5 business days of the Date of Notification and endeavor in good

faith to reach an agreement as to the designation of the material, If the parties are unable to reach

an agreement regarding the designation of the material, the Receiving Party may make an

application to the Court within 10 business days of the Date of Notiftcation, Such application

shall onty be granted for good cause shown, after the Producing Party has been heard' The

disputed material may be submitted to the court for in camera review'

E. The terms of this Stipulation and Protective order do not apply to any information

that a party obtains from a source other than the designating party' Nothing contained in this

section shall constitute a waiver of any privilege by Defendants'

üI.AccEssToDoCUMENTSDESIGNATEDAsPROTECTEDMATERIAL

A.Documentsdesignated6.Inspectiononly''byDefendantsandthecontents

thereot shalt be treated as follows:

Plaintiffs may designate protected Materiar: (r) ,,Attorneys Eyes onry,,; or (2)

5

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 9 of 26 PageID #: 1981

Page 10: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Casa 1-:I3-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Documcnî B4 Filetl A7l22l14 Paçe $ o[ 1-9 Pag*lL) li', Lßgt)

(l) Documents designated "lnspection only" shall be produced for inspectionby Plaintifß'counsel and Plaintifß'Designated support staff at the office of the corporationcounsel' 100 church street, New York, New York 10007. plaintifß,counsel

and plaintifß,Designated Support staff shall be allowed access to the Inspection only documents duringbusiness hours with two days' prior notice to Defense counsel, and outside of business hourswith two days' prior notice, by arrangement with Defense counsel,

(2) During the inspection, Plaintiffs' counsel and plaintiffs, Designated

Support Staff may take handwritten and electronic notes based on the documents on computers

provided by Defense Counsel as follows:

a. Defense Counsel shall provide 6 computers on which Plaintiffs'

Counsel and Plaintiffs' Designated Support Staff may take electronic notes while viewing the

Inspection Only documents, These computers shall have been freshly formatted for these

purposes, including an operating system and software that permits note taking, Defense Counsel

shall not install any additional software on the computers unless they have discussed any

addition with plaintiffs and obtained their approval. Plaintifis' Counsel and Plaintiffs Designated

Support Staff shall be permitted, if necessary, to enable full'disk encryption on the computers'

Defense Counsel shall provide any administrative passwords or privileges necessary for

Plaintiffs' counsel and Plaintiffs' Designated supporl staff to oonfigure secure fl¡ll-disk

encryption on the comPuters'

b. Defendants, Defense Counsel' and Defendants' Designated

support staff are prohibited from monitoring, accessing, copying' tecording' or capturing any

notes or other work product, whether written or oral, generated by Ptaintiffs' counsel and

Plaintiffs, Designated Support Staff while they are present at the inspection site. This prohibition

6

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 10 of 26 PageID #: 1982

Page 11: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

C;rs* L:L3-t:v'öi]448-PKC-)l\A1\ Doculrnnt lå4 f:.ift¡r1 0'/ 12.?-lL4 Paqt; / rs{ 3ü ?açolL} it: Ltig},

forbids, among other things, the installation or use of monitoring or keylogging software on the

computers, the attachment of physical keylogging or monitoring devices to the computers, and

the use of any equipment to remotety monitor Plaintiffs' Counsel and plaintiffs, Designated

Support Staff while they are present at the inspection site.

c. within 30 days after the termination of this matter, including any

appeals, Defense Counsel shall delete and destroy the complete contents of the computer hard-

drives by performing a multi-pass wipe of each hard-drive, and shall veriff the same by affidavit

fi.¡rnished to Plaintifß' Counsel.

d. Plaintiffs' Counsel and Plaintiffs' Designated Supporr Staff may

remove any electronic notes taken on the computer(s) with a Universal Serial Bus (USB) flash

drive, which must be encrypted, Plaintiffs' Counsel and Plaintiffs' Designated Support Staffs

notes must be stored locally on.an encrypted network and only on workstations and computers

used by Plaintiffs' Counsel or Plaintifß' Designated Support Staff, or in other storage systems or

formats that ensure that access is limited to those who are entitled to aocess "Attorneys Eyes

Only" documents. Other than the computer(s) and USB flash drive(s) discussed above, no other

electronic devices are permitted in the room where the Inspection Only documents are located.

(3) Documents designated "lnspection Only" shall not be copied, recorded,

reproduced, transcribed in their entirety, photographed or otherwise removed by Plaintiffs'

counsel or Plaintiffs' Designated support staff from the site of inspection'

(4) Defendants shall make documents designated "Inspection only" available

for use in depositions, court filings, and evidentiary hearings oonsistent with the provisions of

Section IV herein.

7

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 11 of 26 PageID #: 1983

Page 12: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

C¡rso i-.1-3-cv-üí144t1-PKÇ-Jl,Ah Do¿t¡rnent {}4 f:iktd QTl22lI4 Pago tl ol 19 l:açtztD ii: L6l)2

B. Documents designated rrAftorneys Eyes Only,,by Defendants, and the

contents thereof, shall be treated as follows:

(l) Documents designated ,,Attorneys Eyes Only,, by Defendants, and the

contents thereo{, shall only be disclosed to:

a. Plaintifß'Counsel;

b. Plaintiffs' Designated Support Staff.

(2) "Attorneys Eyes only" documents shall only be stored locally an

encrypted network and only on workstations and computers used by plaintiffs, counsel or

Plaintifß' Designated Support Staffl or in other storage systems or formats that ensure that

access is limited to those who are entitled to access "Attorneys Eyes Only" documents.

C. Documents designated "Attorneys Eyes Only" by Plaintiffs, and the contçnts

thereof, shall be treated as follows:

(1) Documents designated "Attorneys Eyes Only" by Plaintiffs, and the

contents thereot shall only be disclosed to:

a. Defense Counsel;

b. Defendants'DesignatedSupportStaff,

(2) ,,Attorneys Eyes only" documents shall only be stored locally and only on

workstationsandcomputersusedbyDefenseCounselorDefendants'DesignatedSupportStaff,

orinotherstoragesystemsorformatsthatensurethataccessislimitedtothosewhoareentitled

to access Attorneys Eyes Only documents'

D.DocumentsdesignatedrrConfidential,,byDefendants,orthecontentsthereof,

shall only be disclosed to Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs' counsel' Plaintiffs' Designated support staff' and

I

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 12 of 26 PageID #: 1984

Page 13: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

tlase t:lil-cv^ü3448-PKC-.lMA Dorumnnt B4 F.itc.d ü"/122^lLt¡ traç* * tsl L9 Paç:lD ít': ).t:t3

deponents during, or in preparation for, that deponent's deposition as oontemplated by Section

IV herein.

E' Documents designated '(Confidential" by Plaintiffs, or the contents thereof,,

shall only be disclosed to Defendants, Defense Counsel, Defendants' Designated Support staf[

and deponents during, or in preparation for, that deponent's deposition as contemplated by

Section IV herein,

F. Documents designated Protected Material, or the contents thereof, shall not be

used for any purpose other than presentation or preparation of a claim or defense in this Action,

G. The Receiving Party shall not disclose or disseminate Protected Material, or the

specific contents thereof, except as provided in Sections III and IV,

H. Inadvertent Disclosure

In the event that any party inadvertently fails to designate a document or portion

thereof as Protected Material, upon notifioation the Receiving Party shall return the document,

and any copies thereof, immediately to the Producing Parly so that the information can be

designated Protected Materiat. The inadvertent fallure to designate such information as Protected

Material shall not constitute a waiver of any privitege or protections hereunder'

I. Control of l)ocuments

The parties shall make reasonabte efforts to prevent unauthorized or inadvertent

disclosure of Protected Material'

IV.UsEoFDOCUMENTSDESIGNATEDASPROTECTEDMATERIAL

A. DePositions

(l)obtaining((Inspectiononly''materialinanticipationofadeposition

9

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 13 of 26 PageID #: 1985

Page 14: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Caser J":i-3-cv-ü1i448-PKC-JMA Dr:cunrernt 84 T:'iled 0712?.1I4 l-]arler i-il of -19 PagoltJ,i!'. 1-b'J4

a. If Plaintiffs' counsel intend to use a document designated

"Inspection Only" as an exhibit at any deposition described in Section IV (A)(2)(a) of this

Stipulation and Order, they must notif, Defense Counsel and identiÛ the document via its Bates

Stamp number at least 5 days in advance of the deposition, Upon receipt of such notice to use the

document as a deposition exhibit, Defense Counsel shall provide the "Inspection Only"

document at the deposition of the deponent, Upon completion of the deposition, Plaintiffs'

Counsel shall retum all "Inspection Only" material to Defense Counsel, who witl retain the

material.

(2) Use of Defendants' Protected Material in Depositions

a. Plaintiffs' Counsel may only use documents designated by

Defendants as "Attorneys Eyes Only" or "lnspection Only" or the contents thereof, in

depositions as follows:

(D During the depositions of persons represented by the Office

of the Corporation Counsel;

(¡D During thc depositions of former NYPD employees, not

including confidential informants or other similar agents, if the deponent was employed by the

NYPD at the time the documents being used were created or modified; the documents refer to

the deponent; or the documents concenì a policy in effect at the time of the deponent's

employment by the NYPD, and that policy was relevant to the deponent's employment with the

NYPD.

(¡i¡) If Plaintiffs' counsel seek to use Protected Material at a

deposition of a current or former NYPD agent, including confrdential informants or similar

agents, the parties shall meet and confer and if an agreement cannot be reached, Plaintiffs'

l0

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 14 of 26 PageID #: 1986

Page 15: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

C¿isr¡ 1".1"3-t:v^01]4A'|ì,-VKC-JMA Dot:*ntentl34 l:;slt:d ü7122.1:1.4 ?açr,t 1..1. of 1^9 Pi:gclT):;!:'. Lf)9r.7

Counsel may make an application to the Court and the Couf shall make a determination

concerning the disclosure of Defendants' Protected Materials to current or former NypD agents,

including .confidential informants or similar agents.

(iv) Nothing contained in this section shall constitute a waiver

of any privilege by Defendants,

b. If Plaintiffs' counsel seek to use Protected Material at a deposition

other than as provided herein, the parties shall meet and confer, and if an agreement cannot be

reached, Plaintiffs may make an application to the Court.

c. Defense Counsel may use documents Defendants have designated

as Protected Material, or the contents thereot at any deposition,

d. Defense Counsel must provide advance notice of their intent to use

documents Defendants have designated "lnspection Only" or "Attorneys Eyes only," or the

contents thereof, at a deposition of any person represented by Plaintiffs' Counsel, In order for

such notification to be effective, Defense Counsel must:

(¡) notif, Plaintifß' Counsel in writing of their intent to use

such Protected Material at least 5 days in advance of the deposition and identif, the Protected

Materialto be used;

(iD re-designate the documents "Confidential"; and

(iii) produce copies of any documents to be used that were

previously designated "lnspection Only,"

(iv) The deponent shall onty view the documents that have been

re-designated in the presenoe of Plaintifß' counsel or during the deposition' Plaintiffs' counsel

ll

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 15 of 26 PageID #: 1987

Page 16: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Cas¡l l":J-3-cv-t)í1448-pKC-JMA D¿:cunternt 84 Fil*ü ü7122. 14 Paç''t L2 c:l 'I9 ?aqe:l\) ,ïl', Lb'attr

shall ensure that the deponent does not retain any copies of the documents. Nothing contained in

this section shall constitute a waiver of any privilege by Defendants.

(3) Use of Plaintiffs'Protected Material in Depositions

à, Defense Counsel may only use documents designated by plaintiffs

as Protected Material, or the contents thereof, in depositions as follows:

(¡) During the deposition of an individual Plaintiff who

produced the document, or, if the Plaintiff is an entity, during the deposition of any board

member, employee, or congregant of the entity,

b. Plaintiffs' Counsel may use documents designated by Plaintiffs as

Protected Material, or the contents thereof, at any deposition.

c. Plaintiffs' Counsel must provide advance notice of their intent to

use documents Plaintiffs have designated "Attomeys Eyes Only," or the contents thereof, at a

deposition of any person represented by Defense Counsel. In order for such notification to be

effective, Plaintifß' Counsel must:

(D notif, Defense Counsel in writing of their intent to use such

Protected Material at least 5 days in advance of the deposition and identiff the Protected

Materialto be used;

(ii) re-designatethedocuments"Confidential'"

(¡ii) The deponent shall only view the documents that have been

re-designated in the presence of Defense Counsel or during the deposition. Defense Counsel

shall ensure that the deponent does not retain any copies of the documents. Nothing contained in

this section shallconstitute a waiver of any privilege by Plaintiffs'

l2

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 16 of 26 PageID #: 1988

Page 17: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Ca.sr:: 1-:13-cv-üil441]-Pl<C^JMl\ Dauxrr:nt tj[ f:ifttrJ 071221L4 Façe 13 al I9 Pi,rqel} ,¡t'. 16#7

(4) Deposition testimony concerning any Protected Material that reveals the

contents of such material shall be presumptively treated as "Attorneys Eyes Only," Within 30

days of receiving the deposition transcript, the designating party will review the transcript and

identify the specific sections that will be designated "Attomeys Eyes Only" or "Confidential," as

set forth above in Section II, and the non-designating party may dispute the designation, as set

forth above in Section IL The designating party may also, where good cause is shown, make an

application tothe Courtto have any deposition testimony excluded as privileged, Portions of the

transcript that are not so designated within 30 days will be deemed unprotected,

B. Court Filings

(l) The parties may use Protected Material in papers filed with the Court in

accordance with the procedures outlined in fhis Stipulation and Order,

(2) The parties agree that in anticipation of filing any papers with the Court

that contain Protected Material they will meet and confer at least 5 business days prior to any

such filing. If a resolution concerning the redaction and sealing of Protected Material can be

agreed upon, they shall make a joint application to the Court, If a resolution cannot be agreed

upon, the party seeking to file under seal will make an application to the Court, including an

unredacted copy of the submission to be made, which will be provided in the first instance to the

judge. Before the application is decided, if any papers are publicly fìled with the Court, all

protected Material at issue shall be redacted, and such redactions must be approved by the

Producing Party prior to fìling'

(3) To the extent that the Court permits Inspection Only documents to be filed

under seal, the fotlowing procedures shall govern the production of such documents:

l3

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 17 of 26 PageID #: 1989

Page 18: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Ça:ir,t 1":1"3^cv-O3448-P KC-JMi\ Dr:cunlcnt ll4 f ilçd O'/ l22lL4 F>ago L4 of 1-9 P;rgelD r'f; l"{ig8

(D If Plaintiffs' Counsel intend to use a document designated

"lnspection Only" as an exhibit to a court filing, they must notiff Defense Counsel and identiS

the document using the designated Bates Stamp number at least 5 days in advance of the filing,

(¡i) Upon receipt of such a notice, Defense Counsel shall

provide a copy of the Inspection Only material to the Court on a USB drive or through hard-

copies that are personally delivered to Chambers,

(ii¡) Plaintiffs' Counsel shall be given an oppornrnity to review

the Inspection Only material filed by Defense counset to verifi that the correct documents were

filed.

C. Evidentiary Hearings

(l) The parties may use Protected Material at any evidentiary hearing before

the Court in accordance with the procedures outlined in this Stipulation and Order.

(2) The parties agree that in anticipation of using any Protected Material at an

evidentiary hearing they will meet and confer at least 5 business days prior to any such hearing,

If a resolution concerning the presentation of Protected Material can be agreed upon, they shall

make a joint application to the Court, If a resolution cannot be agreed upon, the party seeking to

maintain Protected Material confidential during the hearing will make an application to the

Court,

(3) To the extent that the Court permits Inspection Only doouments to be used

at an evidentiary hearing, the following procedures shall govem the production of such

documents:

t4

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 18 of 26 PageID #: 1990

Page 19: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Casc l-:l"lì-cv^ü3441]-PKC-JMA Docunrerrtt 84 l:lb:il L)"/l22iI4 Prxgr: L5 cf J-9 Pi-lgolD /1: 1ô90

(i) If Plaintiffs' Counsel intend to use a document designated

"Inspection Only" at an evidentiary hearing, they must notiff Defense Counsel and identiff the

document using the designated Bates Stamp number at least 5 days in advance of the filing,

(ii) Upon receipt of such a notice, Defense Counsel shall

provide a copy of the Inspection Only material to the Court on a USB drive or through hard-

copies that are personally delivered to Chambers.

(¡¡¡) Plaintiffs' Counsel shall be given an opportunity to review

the Inspection Only material fìled by Defense Counsel to veriff that the correct documents were

filed.

V. RETURN/DESTRUCTION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

A. Within 30 days after the termination of this case, including any appeals , the

counsel for the Receiving Party shall return all hard copies of any Protected Material to the

Producing Party, If Protected Materials have been stored electronically by counselfor any

Receiving Parfy, counsel for the Receiving Party shall permanently erase or delete such materials

and shall verif, the same by affidavit fl¡mished to the Producing Party. To the extent that

Protected Material is contained in any attorney notes or materials, the terms of this Protective

Order shall continue to apply in perpetuity'

vI. ENFORCEMENT

A. This Stipulation and Protective Order shall be binding upon the parties

immediately upon signature of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or Exhibit A, and shall be

submitted to the Court for entry as an Order, The Court may compel compliance with this

Stipulation and Order as an Order of the Court and may otherwise enforce its terms,

l5

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 19 of 26 PageID #: 1991

Page 20: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Çasr: L:13-cv-Ot]4413-F)Kü-JMA Dccunrerrtt 84 l::ilad 0/122{L4 I},tge: 3-6 r>t 1.91,aç¡¿lD r:/; 1"700

Noncompliance with the terms of this stipulation and Order may be treated as a failure to obey a

discovery order pursuant to Fed, R. Civ. P, Rule 37(b) (2XA).

B. If any Protected Material, or the contents thereof, becomes public, or a party has

reason to know that Protected Material has been lost or misplaced, they shall immediately notis

the Couft through a hard-copy letter filed under seal.

C. Any applications made to the Court, as contemplated herein, shall be made in

accordance with the Individual Rules of Judge Joan M. Azrack,

VII. RESERVATIONOF'RIGHTS

A. Production of Protected Material shallnot constitute or be deemed a waiver of

any privilege.

B. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall prohibit any party from claiming

privilege over a portion of a document, or a document in its entirety.

C. Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective order shall be construed to limit the

parties' use of their own Protected Material, except as set forth in Section IV(A).

VIII. MODIX'ICATION FOR EXPERT WITNESSES

At the request of either party, the parties agree to meet and confer in good faith to

determine if modification of the Stipulation and Protective Order in appropriate to permit

disclosure of Protected Material to an expert witness, Prior to the pafties' meeting, the moving

party shall disclose:(i) the name of the expert;(ii) the cuniculum vitae of the expeft; and (iii) a

general description of what the expert is intended to be used for. If the parties are unable to reach

an agreement, the party seeking modification may make an application to the Court, Such

application shall only be granted for good cause shown, after the opposing party has been heard.

16

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 20 of 26 PageID #: 1992

Page 21: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Çase !:!3^çv-A3448-PKC-JMA llr¡*rn*nt 84 T:ilex) l)/ l22lL4 Paçt* L'7 rtf 'I9 Ita\t:ln ,#', LltlL

D¡red: Juq 10, 2014New York, No* Yor'lç

JlçùH¿routo¡Marlko Hlro¡q125 Btond Sucçr, 19ü¡FloorNsw forlc l.low YorL t0019

Tol: 212,607,3100

r l' rr r ,lr

)l!"P--

Adsn J. HuntKJô¡ttûB A, Flctc,horMonlæn,& tfuø¡torLl,P2J0 wost 55á guwrNew Yorh Nçw York 10019Tel: 212,4óE,E00

Hsstø 0, Gollcgos þ'o àac vlcr)Joohue A, HÍÍm¡n (øo lxtc vltvlDsvld Þ, 9onnnotl (pro lxro vice)McnÙoìl & Foctglú l,l,l¡2000 PeD¡1¡Y¡vù¡[a Ar,sruo, NVSuitç 6000TÍrghlngøa D,C,20006Tcl;202,887,1500

,T}ÆRf CA¡.I CNIL LIBERÎIBSI fNl(lN,Fo.fJNDATtÖN

ur,,,f,"{ffift slr.MqPatrlek î'oooroyü¡e¡rdrn BhotmgrAsbtoy Gorcki1 25 8¡ood gtrsot, I Stfi FloorNetl York, Now Yorl 10019'tclt 212,549,2500

NEW YORK ÇIV¡LT.DBRTIBSTJNIONÎOUNDATÏON

Alex¡¡LålOlrryl ShlmnmQdllc F¡urel)A$hqny M, DlSaruo100 Chv¡oh gl¡oqt

l{ew York¡ Now Yo¡k 10007Tcl¡ 212,356,3532

Ánoraeytfw Dcfcndants

A^\/, /,"/

rl

1,7

r ¡ :l

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 21 of 26 PageID #: 1993

Page 22: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Çase l":13-ov-03448-P,KC-JMA Document B4 Filed 0712211,:4 Page L8 of 1-9 PagelA H: I7Q2

CLfir\l1l'tìr)l[( I

Il;\lir ¡''f , l.l'O,'\l SÍ¿KYlt'Bf;,l:Jr.,CLr¡*)-$CHI)OT, 0F t \\\'

,,, l.g'i*tu: þ''l\olr;,i li¡rvvr,'lrlÞlul,r Slt mt¡s: ('r\un Squ$fgf,,rrrr* l,'l,rnd C'ily, li\ | I llll'li'l "l,f ,.¡+t' 'l'+.; I

,,ltfrrr,td.l'¡r t'w Plútril lltr

s() úl(ùEr(EDiÞnc'l'

þ5't,%r'1i'ñ;I rni¡c'J -Il¡rt$ !\,lagirlrtlc Jud¡o

It

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 22 of 26 PageID #: 1994

Page 23: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Case 1:l-3-cv-*344tj-PKC-JMA Dr:cunrent {J4 Filed 07l22lL4 Pag* L9 nf J-9 PagclD iÉ: l"/ü3

EX¡rrErTA

Tho undorulgncd horeby acknowls.dgss th¿t he or shc h¿s rcad tùe Ftnt ¡nmded

Stlpulation and l¡rotecttvo Ordcr For the hoduotion ¡nd Þtoh¡¡ge of Confidciliel Mato¡¡l¡

ontcrcd ln thc Unttcd St¿rco Dtrttlot Cowt fbr ¡hc E¿ctæ¡r Disrlot of Now Yorlc datod

ln tho ætion entlücd Rafa y. Cltl¿ qf NeW Yo*, l3-CV-3448 (PKC) (JMA)

a¡d r¡¡dorstands tho tarrrrp thq¡çof, inoluding thqt hs or she ls boì¡nd by lts tcrmu, Th€

underslgncd egbeee not to u¡c thc Prolcctod Metctial, or tho oonlonh lhorosf, deßngd tbomin for

âny putpo¡o othsr å¡n tbo proeocution or defenæ of this astion,

Daø Siguatrro

PrtntNarp

I9

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 23 of 26 PageID #: 1995

Page 24: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

Exhibit B

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 24 of 26 PageID #: 1996

Page 25: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

,lv\ezvt o €¡ DoR-lel

THE CITY Or NEW YONX

Llw DsplntrvrpNrIOO CHURCH STREgT

NEW YORK, NY I()()OT

Pctcr G, FarrellSenlor Coun¿clZACHARY W, CARTER

Corporotlon Counvl 1'81: (2r2)35ó13532Fûrr (212) 3tó'1509

Maroh 14,2014

Jothro M, Eisensteln, Esq,

Profcta & Eisenstcin45 Broadway, Suite 2200New York, NY 10006

Rer lrlandsohU J,,.Spscipl Scryþgq, 7 t Civ. 2203 (CSH)

Dear Jothro:

I writo in subjoct

to thc followln$ udicial

docüfletltu" snd at any

subseguont ti.me isøgree

that any other invcstigãte stEtemcnts inctudlng those as¡ociated with the Razq lltþation are "plainlyrelsvant" to the cutrçnt dispute,

As we discuseed and agleed, I wíll requcst the Court to so ordcr tho following provlslons

regarding the <li,sclogure of the inwstigatlve strtements,

r Disclosure of ths lnvestigative statamcrrts to occut at the officcs of tho Cotporation Counssl.

r Disclosure of the invostigative statomcnts is limited to ths 5 indivldual Class Comsel,

r No rsmoval or photocopying of the invostigatlve slatemmts,

¡ No roproduetion of thc invo¡tigative stetomenls by hand'

r The information in the fnvestlgotive statc¡rìsíts and any noles generatçd shsll be deemçd,.tAftofno)æ Eyoe Only" and sholl not be diselossd or disoussçd with anyonb ölsc oxcept the Courl'

r Defçndants ¡fray radact informalion in the investigative statomcnts to proteot law enforccment

interscts íncludirrg information roleted to on goÍng lnvestigatlons, the ldeirtity of undercovers and

confidentlal info-iman1.l, methods, and the privacy of iudivlduals'

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 25 of 26 PageID #: 1997

Page 26: CITY OF LAW DEPARTMENT Farrell - aclu.org€¦ · Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1973. In order to facilitate the Settlement Process,

¡ Defendants' agreement to make the investigative ståtenent$ svailqble,forconctitute or be deemed a wniver of auy pdvllege or prohibit defendantslove¡ a porlion of a doclrment or q doçumqnt in its ent{rety.

irtspoction shall norabil{ty to clatrn privllege

11, u (\ o,

V^ H^-- Ça,<a,,,'f '-e úrr- !.iffu,-,j"#l,v-l\-

"ìI*^ 'P^"- 9#et^- 1".-*"**"*J,- tuno;,n- *

Ç!*^- ¿*--*Å- 9-Ña.- ¿&J VAa/ál^- (clrzot ?'

-

W

Senio¡ Counsel

4"---

A-^" 't'' -

p¡vÅ¿-''-¿)

5 o a Q.-Den-fl

2

UçPT

Case 1:13-cv-03448-PKC-JMA Document 91 Filed 08/15/14 Page 26 of 26 PageID #: 1998