city of hamilton
TRANSCRIPT
FACTORS THAT MAY LEAD TO INEFFICIENT READ AUDITS
Methods(Current System)
Absence of stringent data validation rules in
the system
Input errorsLack of meter multipliers
Constantmanual corrections
Machine(Meters)
Different meter types
Different types of physical configurations
Seasonalmeters
Location/ Accessibilityto meters
Estimateconsumptions
Inefficient read audits
Lack of regular read audits
Reliability of ReadsOutsourced
Unexplained reasons for ZERO consumptions or
estimated readsDependance on experienced system operators to interpret
and carry out appropriate corrective actions
Reactive rather than proactive
actions
Lack of dedicated and trained staff to handle locations with oustanding issues
Manpower(SystemOperators)
Daily workload
Contractor'spersonnel with lack of
experience
RECOMMENDATION - CONTINUOUS PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL
RELATED TO SYSTEMS AND OPERATORS
* Perform necessary corrections or database cleanig (method)
* Include field validation rules in the system (method)
* Track the number and circumstances of estimated reads per meter and location
* Incorporate an option in the system to support AUTOMATED read audits in order to identify on a regular basis locations with discrepancies (method)
* Follow up corrective mesures and formally close down outstanding issues on a continuous basis (method)
* Designate and provide training to the staff responsible of the task (manpower)
RELATED TO INDEXES FOR CONTROL
* Number of estimated reads vs number of adjusted reads over a period of time
* Number of Work Orders generated over a period of time vs. number of estimated reads or adjusted reads over the same period
BENEFITS
IMPACT ON OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
* Definition of minimum reading requirements to ensure quality standards
* Better management in the generation of work orders that otherwise may create unnecessary deployment and cost of resources
* Establishment of objective parameters (indexes) to control, penalize or negotiate with reading service providers
CONCLUSION:
Inefficient read audits require constant manual intervention, extensive system learning (experience), and staff availability to proceed
with corrections. In turn, inefficient read audits may cause subsequent adjustments in the billing system with further needs of more resources to perform those adjustments.