city of albuquerque - abc to z mo… · city of albuquerque . public engagement date: abc comp plan...
TRANSCRIPT
City of Albuquerque
Public Engagement
Date: ABC Comp Plan IDO
Feb. 2015 ABC-Z Project Kickoff
May-June 2015 Visioning Workshops Zoning
Diagnosis
July 2015 Focus Groups
Sept. 2015 Vision Draft
Oct. 2015 Module 1: Zones & Uses
Dec. 2015 Focus Groups
Jan. 2016 Comp Plan Draft
April 2016 Comp Plan Revised Draft
May 2016 Module 2: Design Standards
June 2016 Comp Plan Submittal
Aug. 2016 Comp Plan EPC Hearings Module 3: Administration &
Enforcement
Oct. 2016 Consolidated Draft IDO
Dec. 2016 IDO Submittal 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Table 5-1-1: Summary of Development Review Procedures R = Review and/or Recommend D = Review and Decide AR = Appeal Review AD = Appeal Decision
[ ] = Public Meeting < > = Public Hearing
Application Type
Secti
on
5-_
_
Notice Mtgs. Review and Decision Authorities
Pu
bli
sh
ed
ed
Po
ste
d S
ign
Ele
ctr
on
ic M
ail
Web
Po
sti
ng
Pre
-Ap
pli
cati
on
Neig
hb
orh
oo
d
Zo
nin
g E
nfo
rcem
en
t
Off
icer[1
]
Zo
nin
g H
eari
ng
Exam
ine
r
Develo
pm
en
t R
evie
w
Bo
ard
La
nd
mark
s
Co
mm
issio
n
En
vir
on
men
tal P
lan
nin
g
Co
mm
issio
n
La
nd
Use H
eari
ng
Off
icer
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il[2
]
Administrative Decisions
Certificate of Appropriateness –
Minor 1.A
X X D <A> <AR> <AD>
Fence, Wall, or Sign Permit
D <AR> <AD>
Impact Fee Assessment 1.E
D <AR> <AD>
Site Plan – Administrative 1.F X
D <AR> <AD>
Surface Disturbance Permit 1.G D[3]
Wireless Telecommunication Facility 1.H X
D <AR> <AD>
Decisions Requiring a Hearing
Certificate of Appropriateness –
Major 2.A X X X
X X R <D> <AR> <A>
Conditional Use Approval 2.B X X X X
X X X R <D> <AR> <AD>
Site Plan – DRB 2.E X X X X
X X X R [D] <AR> <AD>
Site Plan – EPC 2.F X X X X
X X X R <D> <AR> <AD>
Subdivision of Land – Major 2.I X X X X
X X R <D> <AR> <AD>
Variance 2.K X X X X
X X R <D> <AR> <AD>
Policy Decisions
Amendment to Zoning Map – EPC 3.A X X X X X X X R <D> <AR> <AD>
Amendment to Zoning Map – Council [5]
3.B X X X X X X X R <R> <D>
Amendment to IDO Text 3.D X X X R <R> <D>
Annexation of Land 3.E X X X X X R <R> <D>
Amendment of Comprehensive Plan 3.F X X X R <R> <D>
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Table 5-4-1: Allowable Administrative Deviations
Standard
Maximum Allowable Deviation
(Cumulative of Earlier Approved
Deviations)
Minimum Lot Area 10%
Lot Width 10%
Minimum Front Setback 15%
Minimum Side Setback 15%
Minimum Rear Setback 10%
Maximum Height, Principal Building 10%
Minimum Number of Vehicle Parking Spaces 5%
Street Tree Spacing 10%
Wall and Fence Height 6 in.
Any Other Dimensional Standard 10%
Any standard cited in an applicant for
“reasonable accommodation” or “reasonable
modification” under the federal Fair Housing Act
Amendments
The minimum deviation necessary to
comply with the federal Fair Housing Act
Amendments
•
•
•
•
•
•
Administrative Decisions Certificate of Appropriateness – Minor
Declaratory Ruling or Certificate
Fence, Wall, or Sign Permit
Permit
Alternative Signage Plan
Grading, Drainage or Paving Approval
Impact Fee Assessment
Site Plan – Administrative
Surface Disturbance Permit
Wireless Telecommunication Facility
Permit
Waiver
Decisions Requiring a Hearing Certificate of Appropriateness – Major
Conditional Use Approval
Demolition of Non-Designated Structure Outside of HPO
Expansion of Nonconforming Use or Structure
Site Plan – DRB
Site Plan – EPC
Solar Rights Permit
Subdivision of Land – Minor
Subdivision of Land – Major
Preliminary Plat (Including Variance and/or Improvement Agreement)
Final Plat
Vacation of Public Easement or ROW
Variance
Development Standard
Public R-O-W Sidewalk
Policy Decisions Amendment to Zoning Map – EPC
Amendment to Zoning Map – Council
Creation or Amendment of Text or Map for an HPO District or
Designation of a Landmark Structure or Site
Amendment to IDO Text
Annexation of Land
Adoption or Amendment of Comprehensive Plan
Creation or Amendment of Text or Map for an HPO District or
Designation of a Landmark Structure or Site
City Staff / Zoning
Enforcement Officer Review and/or Recommend
Landmarks Commission Review and/or Recommend
(Not applicable to Landmark Structure Applications)
City Council Review and Decide P
Indicates public input opportunity
P
P
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
