citi v. paules york cty. 2011-su-1542-06 admin process defeats citibank and scumbags at phelan...

Upload: christopher-king

Post on 07-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    1/18

    IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF YORK COUNTYt PENNSYLVANIACNIL ACTION - LAW

    CITIMORTGAGE, INC., S/BIM TO PRINCIPALRESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE, INC.

    PlaintiffNO. 2011-SU-lS42-06

    v.BRIAN W. PAULESNINA L. PAULES

    Defendants

    NOTICE TO PLEAD 1TO: Citimortgage, Inc., s/b/m to Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc., Plaintiff

    You are hereby notified to plead to the enclosed New Matter within twenty (20) days fromservice hereof or a default judgment may be entered against you;

    BL PP & RAU SCH, LL P

    By:_iif-.Y-~ _n fBaranski, Esquire

    'Attorney for DefendantsSupreme Ct. I.D. #8258517 East Market StreetYorkt PA [email protected] (717) 845-3674Fax N o. (717) 854-7839

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    2/18

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~

    NO. 2011 -SU -lS42- 06

    IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF YORK COUNTY~ PENNSYLVANIAC IV IL A CTIO N -:LAW

    CITIMORTGAGE, INC., SIBIM TO PRINCIPALRESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE, INC.

    Plaintiff .v .

    RIAN W . PAULESN IN A L. PA ULES ..DefendantsANSWER WITH NEW MATTER

    TO COMPLAINT IN MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE.," .

    AND NOW COMES the D efendants, B rian W . Paules and N ina L . Paules, and bY..,.theirattorneys, Blakey, Yost, B up p & Rausch, LL P. and files this A nsw er w ith ,N ew Matter to ';Complaint in Mortgage Foreclosure as follows:

    1. Admitted.Admitted. -"

    -tJ. Admitted in p art and denied in part. Defendants a dm it th ey executed a mo rtg ag eto American Home Bank, N.A. which is recorded at 1576, page 7506. Defendants deny that itwas assigned to Plaintiff. On the contrary the mortgage was assigned to Principal ResidentialMortgage, Inc.

    4. Admitted.

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    3/18

    5. The averments of Paragraph 5 of are conclusions of law to which no.response isrequired.

    '..

    . 6. Denied. Defendants are without sufficient information or knowledge to form abelief as to the truth of these averments and strict proof thereof is demanded.

    7. Admitted.8. The averments of paragraph 8 are conclusions of law to which no respons~'is

    required.WHEREFORE, Defendants request judgment in their favor and against Plaintiff ..

    NEW MATTER9. The averments of Paragraphs 1 through 8 are incorporated as if set forth herein in

    their entirety.10. On February 22, 2011, Defendants se~t a certified letter to CitiMortgage, Inc., and

    o CitiMortgage. The letter is attached hereto, incorporated herein and marked as E xhibit TtA ".1. The letter was delivered to Citilvlortgage, Inc. and signed for by IlJ. Rhoads" on

    March 2, 2011. A copy of the USPS Certificate of Mailing and the USPS Domestic ReturnReceipt is attached hereto, incorporated herein an d marked a~ Exhibit "B".

    12. The purpose and intent of this letter was to form a self-executing agreement with

    Plaintiff.13. By the tenus of the agreement, Defendants would tender $145,000.00 into escrow

    with a Gloria J. Thompson, a third party escrow agent, with the funds to be released to the

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    4/18

    P la in ti ff upon pre sen ta tion by the P laintiff to M s. T hom pson of the original, w et ink signatureNo te s ec ur ed by the M ortgage w hich is th e sub ject of this foreclosure action .

    15 . T he letter w as delivered to C itiM ortgage, Inc. and signed for by "J. N evois" on

    14. On March 8,2011, third party escrow agent G loria 1. T homp so n sen t a certifiedletter to C itiM ortg age, In c. and C itiM ortgage. A co py o f the letter is a ttached h ereto,inco rp orated herein an d m ark ed as E xhib it "C ".

    arch 11,2011. See Exhib it "B".

    . .. . j ;16. M s. Thom pson's letter. of M arch 8, 2011 confirm ed to C itim ortgage, Inc. that she

    h ad in h er p ossessio n D efen dan ts' $ 14 5,0 00 .0 0. ~17. M s. Thompson executed a Third Party Affidavit of Service on March 8, 2011.

    A ttached hereto, incorporated herein and m ark ed as Exhib it "D " is a copy of M s. T hom pson 's

    M arc h 8 ,2 01 1 affid av it.18 . On April 5, 2011 , third party escrow agent G loria J. Thom pson sent a N otice of

    D efa ult a nd Opportunity to Cure by certified mail to CitiMortgage, Inc. and CitiMortgage. Acopy of the notice is a tta ch ed h ere to , in co rp ora te d h ere in and marked as E xh ib it " E" .

    19. The Notice was delivered to C itiM ortgage, Inc. and signed for by "B . T alley " o nA pril S, 201 L See Exhibit "8'1.

    20. M s. T hom pson executed a Third Party A ffidavit of Service on A pril 5, 2011.A ttached hereto, incorporated herein and m arked as E xhibit "F" is a copy of M s. T hom pson 'sA p ril 5 ,2 01 1 a ffid av it.

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    5/18

    21. On April 19, 2011, th ird party escrow agent G loria 1. Thomp so n ex ecu ted anffidavit of Non -R esp on se C ommercia l Oath Verific atio n. A tta ch ed h ere to , in co rp ora te d hereinnd marked as Exhibit JIG"is a copy of the Affidavit of Non-Response.

    22. The certified mailings delivered to Plaintiff and attached hereto, form a contractith Defendants, the terms of which required Plaintiff to produce the original wet ink signature

    Note signed by Defendants.23. " Plaintiff failed to produce the original, wet ink signature Note signed by

    Defendants or provide an explanation why such Note could not be produced.24. Plaintiffs failure to produce the original wet ink signature Note constitutesa

    default by Plaintiff of the terms of the agreement formed with Defendants by the certifiedmailings attached hereto.

    25. As a result of Plaintiffs default. Defendants ar e entitled to recover damages

    26 . The amount of damages claimed b y Defe nd an ts " ag ain st Plai~tiff exceeds t~eagainst Plaintiff.

    arbitration limits of York County.WHEREFORE, Defendants" demand judgment against Plaintiff in an amount in excess of

    the arbitration limits of York County.

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    6/18

    . Baranski, Jr., Esquiret. LD. #82585East Market Street

    York, PA [email protected] (717) 845-3674Fax No. (717) 854-7839Attorney for Defendants

    -: ' : _. :, ,, . . . ~

    Dated:

    ~.

    ~.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    7/18

    VERIFICATIONI verify that the information set forth in the foregoing Answer w ith New Matter is true and

    correct to the best of Illy knowledge. information and belief: I understand that any false statements

    Bri~u2Lcontained herein nrc subject to th e penalties of 18 Pa. C .S. 4904 relating (0 unsworn falsification toauthorities.

    . 1

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    8/18

    - - - . ; _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . .ook a-34 ~age 81 1c

    c

    c

    t1 care I! f : Gb'1a J. ~ H!lI&IyF'IdC. ( 1 ' : B r t 3 I 1 W. and _..PNesP.O. 8al1S

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    9/18

    Book H-34 Page 8U

    c

    c The PIf1e$ k'I_ao= Io"CWtmI to IXlIII\IIInI RccutOl-U)dgmenl 0 I I I 7 1 D I J : WI)' b I! 3! ! _ III'd odj"tnadlol ~ oal II lI> be ~ I > U . t>II"IIpIIacJlo I W r I I u c I . Thi! FIIIt[)otjI C "_' .:dlt:j procIIa"~"""""('oI:II,,*~IIIIIIt.""'1IIIR"'1D~~)'IUd*nbf145JXQ.OO_lIIprte.l.huti!rt~ "'dIIcePl>ew.r-~. . . .. , . _ , . . JW . , . , .- t D IiIII!IedldIIf P*J _ ... ~ n.1wouid be t......1hI~.nan~ 80, 1f1_SM5.000.00"m,ou "'Il>~ht 1;ldgNI~ (od~ ~ rIIItIIanrurtollllOQI:lIIedIIIl1 _ w I I * o 2IIc11opalyt1A,6..ceIpI aI_llftI .."_/v!InI.or')ClIIIII!iIJlItIOccl!dfnrnll'le ec- /Ig8It10M lI>~h ~ I.Idofed (wei Wcalpllldl) na. f O I I . - . . .~ , . , . . $4.... 00 SIv.Id~t;IO bl~.,.,me~CllJU1egrea IDgrII"tRllt"_'d J \ I I ! l I t ' I e r ' " hlndllllIit. ~b'~I~ ~and bllerla'ofIbn. _.~ me.-.nlQRlnslllllll'ClX'llJheId~ r a u Cllllcnd~-.I~ m. Y~lIgRO"'ln.,coIaItll;"""of'_'~..-olI'_~n'lllllldluhrrdoe ta y o u ' " J ' C I I l SIPM IDPl' 1J!'f1eQlll--~'" call1dln;tfJ8CaUII rdr'JIIIl p#md1orA atI r e tI I e ~ pilfl"lOih IftIIU pay!lllrtOltle*~ ...... lhtpernnl d~" I'd........ l;IaIafIha 1re IE IIimage$ bd !ltdbillnRIfon ID 1Ile1lll! ! l 01.. dImege:t p:iIIILTa.._Ibd_...-- .. I U l ! J I I I n d I n g : orhJ~~ .... ~m!fnul_halgi'lll"""_' ( 1o C ~ ~) ll

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    10/18

    BookH-34 Page 8.13J.~ v;'" lc ! ~ L~ h ._.CERTIFIED [,/1All RECEIPl

    00(:.", .....,,:.I,~'II{G:f' "'J };-j.r..;',Jr'C(1 (.(..;0,[,;.10;" f.!;.'}C:"lr:~

    USE__ II>:

    CitiMortgage.lnc.1 00 0 T ec hn olo gy D riv eO 'F Il IJ en . MO 88901- 6006

    -

    .'..... ""'."i'.,.--;......--f--

    ; - = - ; 1 r . : ~ CEI-n;r'~:_ ';1\".- .{Jc , ' , . . . ' ' . ' .! '

    OFF IC IA L U.,SE

    CitiMortpgc, InC. ,1000 TedmoJogy DriveO 'F all en , MO 8S9 01 -6 (l0 6

    CitiMCl:ItgaSe, Inc.I~TecImology DriveO 'F al le n; MO 88901 -6 00 6

    ~ - ,----------- _ _ _ . _ - .

    '."

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    11/18

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Book H-34 P~ge 'S09. InalI1I of : G I c r i a J. ~,NOIarY I\ItIic

    P .O_ Box 1825\St. PeIetBbwg. Fl33733-a251 .

    To: SII r f l I OIlS, ~rrtCiIiMof1gage, InC.1000 TedlnoIDgy 0 ! 1 Y e0'f8len. MO 88901 .e006Sanj lv [)as.. PrasIdentCIt iMoIIQage1000T~ CrifIO ' F a f IB r \ NO .&OH IOO6

    RII: Fla'ds In I I ' 1 I I ' I U I ' I D I I I l t IlfSl4S,OOOllO I ' I ! I Id tlElavwfor CI!Morta9.II&; to J e I! I e ~ Na. !974145-6;~ N o ta ~ 8IId RsquIred r a r ~ gf1w;la; APBAWlI I IaI I fe unti ()I.1)5I201'_

    j,

    ,1 ",.1~'.J

    . . .i.It

    r

    09at M r. Das:M ygU hIM:! ~ ~ IlOtmd vi a a a 1 i l I I ! I : I mall no.: 7008\83UIOI:W48S0137 and iii: IIwI'tlql.eSl d 8 r 1 I i n W. I I 1 ' I I Nh1 LP&lIe$, J am In I e o e I ! 4 , as Es: :r ow ~ of 'IIlgaI1enderblds" In !I'le I I 1 ' i : I U n I d $ 14 6, 00 0- 00 t o be pUllrJ e~ I4lOn~ Ilfb ~ I I J I 8 f t a r a d t w e t Ink ~ ~ nob! hI!tjby JCl.I- ClDIWnI an I I lan ..mw3f/T4145oaAI ygcI I ' I:lIIfiest __ ..... . Q:1Ie(:th am. bj!llnderfng h0!Ignd ~ (wet He~) iloIII to IR! by0W5I20". BrlanW jim 1 6 " 1 8 L f 'a1jes ~ I!lIa 110 Ihet!!le nata IIIIIJ noI be.-,*, b' QIII8cticn U pcn ~ af1l'l f)J~ I.NIIMIId (\IIeIlnk~)'" Iwi!a-dU ~'" IMS,Q )O.OO n o w " " helCl'OWlII )'QU or Ihotlg8llt,auIieIIgnmII tD 1 ' I I C I : h e . . .. . Iam aeo ~ to ~ ~ t & m c a _1M ~ CorlIM:I me 'Ita US1 i II I iI . . 1QQII ..pc:aIIIIIJ to 1C t le IUa !he ~ M r . Pa#I!s an d Nna LynnPNm"l1!qIdret l' lll ll ~~ pIJ!I I18It to . . on ~1. 10J l I e a a e do n o t deIoy_ SIDaI ~ 11& IPlIcrCl!fl,t)rtgagll d e f a u f t . 011 0WS2011, I wI!I l$aue III MIdIvI C It No n Respan Ie .Iam POt. pMt)I tg 1II'Iy~ ~ ~ hi:. . OIilob\jag!o and Iit'. ~ m:I HInIILrnn"""m:I am nweIy~ _ane-~a I'IIIIJlraItid per!yVl lhO e!riMeS hit III ID'Ifi!II:.- aI.~ _1I l I I l )1Ofl !nderto) 'Ol l e 1 e IInIaWilg!he ~ aIcIII ld.. I t ismy 1apt1i1Sla)' to IIIpGIt eiI'IIr a ILJIlOII&8M ~wIIh, at' II ~ t I r . CI I iYoo tg : I ga . n:.or

    . ~~tt:: I'hn ora LymPmJes

    --",_.,_.-_-GlCIiIIA,I._lotd" __ "~llwtl"_~"" __IJI I I_ '"__ "'IO IJ II __ "_ . . ._ . . . ._ " . . . . . . . r o _ . . . . .l_olJ' ...,....._n~CNy_...._~. ..__ .._

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    12/18

    - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ook H -34 ~age 81 0

    lH lR D P AR TY A FF ID AY I1 O F S EJ MC E

    I , GIO I Ia J. ~ mrtify thsl J an, end m.d times mm g tile earric8 of~'_' II Ol _ ihIn 1& ~ ofage end no t 8paty II)1bII1'I 'l8IW"~ v o tI Id l ~ ofp

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    13/18

    Book 8-34 Page 807

    fn c e r e of : G lo ria J , 1l!cit1p5a\ No!aIy P \ l I l ! i CP.O. Box 1~1SL ~ FL 33733 -6251

    Dam: 04/00l2011

    To: S e I l l V O aa , f'resIdI!r1!~Ircc.1 000 Tec II nO Io g y DIM!0'F8Ien. w- 8S901-6003S a r t w O aa Presidenl~1000 TedlI IokW o m . eaFakt. MO 88901.$lO6

    Ra : MoIIce at Faaft w ! I b r e Q I I I II to Ih& fKIlarI d~ n c . a~10 (dad $1015,000.00 held inEecrtrwb'AHMSIIIRIItiI hxxulI No. 39747~fIIrn cl ~ a~, IN:, 1Opm!uallN.~ d'IIIIIlreIt < -t . .~) ~ IIQ I& reqund br"_ cllnIs; Mnte : _ made IMII!Ibe unI ! I~ 1, .-.d wi! be I ' I I I I . m e d go04'(312011.

    NoCfa of Opportwtftr toCum PiIaIe adG! I T W t wII1in n IiouII thallte NctlIIIIIIlI b&prcQ,ad an:! the FDa will behekllftl be made IMJiIlll*' for 'JfU ~Dear Mr. [)as:hI)'t'U w er e ~ I IDI ia!O, ac!lle I I !qUe8t o f BrIa n ~ & r i d fhLynn f ' I I A e i I . , '- h e l d 11 \ aaow " _ 1 I ! n ~ ; " I ! I l Ia II9nder iJncIs" In 11MSII IDImI Qf$1~OOO.OO tD be paid III~ Inc. I IP QI I ~ of lteoVnallA"lllllfl'ad (Wet ilk~) ~ /lU8 hetI b't)'I)U (rrru 1IgeI'b) lIS C C I I a I B n I I CIIlIOan IUICler 397474$-6 . , .. o f IMI05I2J)1 t I hae no ! h8InIfnn)'I)U: Iioo re r ro m ~ 1m:. QJ' ~ has CIlIlbIc:ted me v.th reganllO IDdIIr'Qng Ite ~ UI ' I8 l Ien!d ('III8I1r*sIgrraturv) f'toIrissIIry Nota an d cdIod ~ $14S .000 .00 , have held fo r you .

    .~" .

    ,_ not. partJ toMf1 cIeafrga ~ ~ tnc., ~eI .-.d Mr : , .. . . ard NirIa L yn n ~ and_mate!)' aarg lIS an e-1oQent .~~~. ---~. . . . .

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    14/18

    >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . , .ook H-34 ~age 80 8

    I, Gloria J_ ~ I l I ! f1i f) t that 1 a m . end 8 1 al l tmes d U I i I ' I g 1 I ' I B seMoe o f pmcess-. no t les1!lan 18yon. of IIIJ!l B n I t no t apafty tollle I n I I ! D 3 r c :oooemtng wltldl & e I V i I l e Ql'pIOQIl$!l_ msd!I . I fIa1MI: cmI l I y lhat lIB I I t N h : : I I ~I!o J I c U f FuodII Hetd InEKroW end)lOOT Claim c h a l ' U i n l l $145,oco'OO on b e h a l f o f ~ Pl ltAeB - mada an r~ .2 0 1 - ' - by:X. Md.m:.: by 0 I I J t i 5 e d U n I 1 B d staIas mall , po$IgI!I f uI I1 ~ addIIII:sed !IX

    Self\'o.~mc .1000 TadI'IoIogy [)rNe0'NIan. MO &! ! lO t .eooeS a I i i V [)asCi l iMongag4l1000 'tecmotcgy D m < B0'Mll len . Me) 88901..$)06Persma! S8nI I I ; Ie: By ImMrg !he J I ' C C I I I S $ w I 1 h aIIPrnIIy iI)f p I M 1 H I '~ SeM::e: By Jeml; IhII ~wllIIlI'e ~P I . t b i c a t iO n : llIe d ef a nc Ia iI t _ aenecI as Ic!IIMt: ~ISlam Law: Th! ~ _.-eel pIII8IId III l ia .. aflhe SIIiI d 8S f t I I o i I I I s : { D B I c : I t I e 1

    " ' / f / J l. "

    ,

    . . . .

    '.,

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    15/18

    Book H -34 ~3qe 80 4'--"----_;__--------_ . . .~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ n l l l l ~ I B

    2 0 1 1 0 0 2 8 0 8M AC ON C O. N e F EE S Il6 .00H O N- ST AN O AR D D OC F EE $ 25 .0 01I"M;:RJITEI ~04-28-201102:09:48 PMTOCORABI'I ltot11rit:lPEE'l'J~ft~BK: CRPH-34PG : 8 04 - 81 3

    AF 'F IDA V IT OF NON-RESPONSECOMMERCIAL OATH AND VERlFlCA110N

    The State of florida ))

    Pinellas County )

    Gloria J.Th omps o n . N otm y P nb lH ; aet ing lIS a nad ra J third party Escrow AgeDt underHer Commetc ia l Oalh witb unlimited liability. proc:eoding in good fu i th bcingofsoundmind states that the facts contained herein are t :rue, ~ compfete IIld not misleading tothe best of Her priY8le f ir st hand knowl edge and be li ef unde r p ena lt y of latemationalCommercial Law.I. 1'bat the evidc=e shows that the Respondent . Sanjiv D as Prc:sidentI CEO ofC~ Inc., scrv.iclng agent ofCitiMongage. Inc. (hereina&r "CitiMortpgejnamed in Brian-Weston: Paules 's adminiS1ratlveremedy "Coodil ionaJ Accep ta l lCC ofYour Offer and Complaintclmging me $t4S,ooo.OO(wilb fees and rosas) and th e Termsof Contract" was duly served by Certified Mail OIl OJ ' about 03 lO 2J2 01 1 A D 81 s t Iacbed .With notice to coD ed th e funds held inEscrow and to p r o c S 1 H : c : the origfnal Unalteftd(wet inlt signatuJe) promissoJy note claimed to be beld by CitlMcctgage. Inc., s e r v i d n s

    agent ofCitiMortga&e and 1h e basis of thei r c la im .2 . T ha 13 days fo r C i tiMortgsge. lnc . . s e rv ic ing agent ofCitiMortgage tA l withdraw thec la im and /or dt:mand for paymen t and refUse Brian-We:ston: Paules 's se lf-exeal tingcontract were allowed a nd no withdrawal wa s made.3 . T ha t the Notic e o f F un ds in th e amount ofSI45.000.00 held in Escrow forCitiMortgagc;1nc.; to set t le ACQ1UJlt N o. 3 9 74 74 5- 6; o rig in al unaItued (wet in kSignature) note requested and required fw r el ease o f funds and the 20 days cO 1:01Iec:t,8$ atIadIcd. wa s n:ceived I I I ! d c ommen ced o n OJ/II1201 J.

    f'II!C 1ofl

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    16/18

    Book 8-34 Page 80S- - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    4. That the date t o c oll ec t th e $ 14 5,0 00 .0 0 a n d ' produce the original unaltered (~inksignature) note held by CitiM~ Inc .. 9UVkmg agern o f C it iM o rt pg e t: on elu de don 04/05f2011.5 . T ha t t h e : NOT IC E O F FAULT. ssattaclzed. wa s re ce iv ed o n o r about 0410& '201 ] ADcommeocing th e 3 da y OFPORT tJNI TY TO CURE n ot i nc lu din g dte da y received.6. Tha t 3 d ay s f or mailing w c : r c aIJo\wd an d con cl ul le d o n o r 9bout 0411912011.

    1. T hat no response or ' lmempt to co ll ec t t enden:d pa)'tllcnt o f$ 14 5.00 0.0 0 held in escro wto any of th e a bo ve nO li ce s i s~ v id en cc d by U .S . MA IL en d any Ofhcr pr ivate carrier.8. Tha t 1h e Respondent, &uljiv , Pm.idcotl CE O of CitiMortgagc, Inc.. s:::rvicing agento f C i tiMmtgage a n : : now in DAULT without I ' I: I C O U r . l ' C an d is found inagn:crnenl andbatmO'll)' with the Declarant, B n a n - w e s n m : P a w c s . in his "Conditiotul\ AcceptanCe o fYOU T Offer an d ComPlaint~ $]4S.000.00 ( wi dl f ee s and costs) a D d Ihc Terms ofContract." Which terms me 10 hold $14S,OOO.OOn lc :gal tender f U n d s fo rcolkction by Sanjiv Dss , tlC EO ofC itlM ortg ag e. ln e., scrvi

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    17/18

    Book -34 Page ij06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - -_ _,N60GlJll[L\J.TIOo!I'5Ult;" ... .. .. ""'_d_ ... ~ ... _ .. ~ ... bq.!_SIoo1lotJ""'ridod""_ .. I I o o~ " " ' _ I I > _ . . , . GdIiAL' I I ! o I o I P S O H bJilJT.~ .. ""'.,;".-' .. OILY .... ;.._....." .. .. 1 ! m . . . l

    Pine l las 0:Hmty )) ss. JURAT)lorida. Republic

    I H J \ ( ! = t e l l . a : : n 1 1 J J l " ) I S ' ~ P ub lic in and fo r th e above state andcounty, do at tes t and swear that on this of ~.r.. . 2 : 0 J . . ! . ,that G lo ria 1 . Thompson pm.;onally .appeared befcre me, and on 1h c basis of satisfactorye vi de nc e p ro ve d tobe the person(s) who attesWd and subscr ib ed to t he w it hi n i ns tt um en t. ,by Ulc above--namcd panics' uulimitl:d commcrciall~lity. A A ~ complete andnot misleading. Witness my hand and seaHhis ...J,l--W"of te..lL. 20Jj.

    . . .

  • 8/3/2019 Citi v. Paules York Cty. 2011-SU-1542-06 Admin Process Defeats Citibank and Scumbags at Phelan Hallinan & Schm

    18/18

    ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICEI hereby certify that on this \ 8 day of ~ 2011, a copy of the foregoing

    Answer t o Comp la in t in Mo rtg ag e F oreclo su re w as' s~rkd by first class m ail, postage prepaid onthe following:

    Allison F. Wells, EsquireP hel an Ha ll in an & S chm ieg , L LP16] 7 JFK Boulevard, Su ite 14 00Philadelphia, PA 19103

    By:

    r"!,

    BUPP & RAU SCH, L LP."

    a ra ii sk i, J r., E squ ireSupreme Ct. 1.0. No. 8258517 East Market StreetYork, Pennsylvania [email protected](717) 845~3674A tto rn ey fo r D efe nd an ts

    , ,

    .'

    ''0....t;,: ':l..~. . . .:;~

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]