cit 2010-spiders
TRANSCRIPT
Using Emerging Technologies
By Eileen O’Connor, Ph.D.
And peer & administrative support within Empire State College’s Center for Graduate Programs
The technologies and the sharing: the value of the Spiders
• Over the past few years, the following have been integrated into online courses: – Streaming video case-studies for discussion – Second Life – Wikis (www.wetpaint.com )– YouTube for microteaching
• Ideas and support from the Spiders & from the graduate dean – critical for enabling the use of emerging technologies
• To make online less text based and more truly interactive
• To continuously improve online courses so they can become more useful ways of creating a change in teaching practice
Having administrative and peer support has furthered this dream considerably – Some evidence on the following slides
Personal motto
Beginning with streaming video
• Giving online pre-service teachers a better opportunity to see effective teaching
Urban students with creative lessons were taped & then streamed into courses
Students showed concern & repartee & respect for each others ideas
Online graduate students were able to consider best practices that they were not necessarily seeing in their K12 observations
Second Life
• Interactivity and personalization for graduate courses
• Extended interaction opportunities – Across geography & disciplines
• A virtual meeting space, discussion area, and classroom
MAT Science Center (under revamping)
Class presentations – PowerPoint gone virtual
Multiple means of communication & real classrooms
Meeting the Dean
Guest lecturers – assistive technologies
ISTE – preparing for a meeting
NSF – NASA virtual meeting
Virtual, but real, weather
NOAA site - tsuanami
Best expressed through an instructional metaphor: like designing an intelligent experience (field trip /
discussions / role playing / construction) . . . with an assessment
Discussions / collaborations /
role playing
Explorations - Field trips
- Simulations
Building / creating
More advanced uses
Using wikis
• Testing ways to encourage better peer networking
• Creating real resources that can be used later
The assignmentprocess
Plan & create wiki w/ team
Anonymous peer assessment
Instructor evaluation
Peer comments circulated
Some made revisions
Final vote of publication ready
Findings & conclusions – no longer the vacuum of lost work – open education
Modeling • Emerging best practices for
K12 & teacher education
Easy to use • Plus instructor confidence in
participation
Ownership• Class pride and accountability
Useful products • Developed materials needed
in the course
Sophisticated learning • Moving beyond course topics;
more internet awareness
The peer assessment was an important facet of expanded learning
•School endorsement? Ongoing updating? Professional presence?
Web issues
•No longer simply content provider
•Orchestrating / managing timetable & process; review liaison
•Involvement in the thinking/learning process
Instructor role shifts
•How do you evaluate the complexities of a process when the standard is “the paper”?
• Do students and institutions truly value this type of work?
Valuing / assessing
•Useful content created; a legacy
•Greater involvement & professionalism
•Incorporating & modeling future ways of learning
HOWEVER
YouTubes
• Posting their microteaching lessons – within an online course
• Better review: – By content-pedagogy faculty – Assessment of use of technologies
• Better collegiality and knowledge of the students
Easy to use / excellent for performance based assessment
View students’ actual work
Determine if they are performing correctly . . . even at a
distance
Value to using YouTube, in general•Access
ible to most students
•Useful especially with online; improves student & teacher communication
Easily implemented
•Many facets can be studied
•Richer assessments possible since live materials can be readily reviewed
“Performance” can now be observed
•New questions arise about what is evidence of learning in the content area
New ways of teaching &
learning emerge
The support, sharing, & encouragement have been the most critical elements
• Ideas from colleagues; willingness to share and experiment
• Managerial support – ESSENTIAL if faculty are to embrace tech; especially early implementers
UNDERLYING THEME WITH NEW TECH: How do we value, integrate, measure, assess, and update-our-thinking about the affordances available with these amazing new communication tools?