cigarette smoking and infertility de mouzon jacques, md, mph, inserm u822, le kremlin-bicêtre,...
TRANSCRIPT
Cigarette smoking and infertility
de Mouzon Jacques, MD, MPH, INSERM U822, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Introduction Cigarette smoking associated to many pathologies
Cancer : Lung, Stomach, Bladder, etc. Cardiovascular disease, lung insufficiency, etc. First cause of preventable mortality in France (65000 deaths)
Among women, well established role in pregnancy Pre-eclampsia,, Placenta praevia, Abruptio placentae Fetus : birth weight (150-200g), small for gestational age
Increasing concern in human reproduction For natural fertility (woman and man) For ART
Several hypotheses for action mode
Normal fertility On average, 85% of couples conceive within 12
months 90 % within 18 months What about cigarette smokers ?
de Mouzon J, Spira A, Schwartz D. Int J Epidemiol 1988,17:378-384
Diminution of probability to conceiveFrench study (Gefco)
0102030405060708090
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Cycles
%SmokersNon smokers
1887 couples, planned pregnancies
Increase in TTPEuropean study (7 countries)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 à 10 ≥ 11
Population
Maternityhospitals
Cigarettes / day
%
Bolumar F, Olsen J, Boldsen J et al. Am J Epidemiol 1996,143:578-587
* **
Infertility duration multiplied by : 1.2 pour 1 - 10 cigarettes (1.1-1.4) 1.5 pour > 10 (1.3-1.8)
General population : 3187 planned pregnanciesMaternity hospitals : 2587 planned pregnancies
TTP > 9,5 months
Increase in TTP (2)England (Avon county)
05
10152025303540
Nonsmokers
1 to 4 5-9 10-14 15-19 ≥ 20
> 6 months > 12 months Linéaire (> 12 months) Linéaire (> 6 months)
Passivecigarettes / day
8515 planned pregnancies
Hull MGR, North K, Taylor H et al. Fertil Steril 2000,74:725-733
%
Increased risk of TTP≥ 12 months Male and female smoking
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
NonSmoker
1 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 ≥ 20
Woman Man cigarettes
8515 planned pregnancies
Hull MGR, North K, Taylor H et al. Fertil Steril 2000,74:725-733
English study
Male and female smokingCanadian study
Woman’s smoking
Man’s smoking No Yes
No 1.00 0.95 (0.84 - 1.07)
Yes 0.91 (0.83 - 1.00) 0.77 (0.68 - 0.85)
Woman +, Man +, Both man and woman ++
OR for fecundibility
Curtis KM, Savitz DA, Arbuckle TE Am J Epidemiol 1997,146:32-41
Ontario Farm Family Health Study:2607 planned pregnancies
In utero exposition to smokingOdds-ratios for fecundibility
Woman Woman’s mother OR CI 95%
Non smoking Non smoking 1.00 ---
Smoking 0.70 0.48-1.03
Smoking Non smoking 0.67 0.42-1.06
Smoking 0.53 0.31-0.91
Jensen TK, Henriksen TB, HjollundNHI et al. Am J Epidemiol 1998,148:992-997
Prospective study, CO stopping, 423 couples, multivariate analysis
In utero exposition to smoking Danish study (2)
Jensen et al, Int J Androl. 2006 National cohort of twins born 1931 - 1952
1653 women / 1598 men, with TTP Exposition in utero to cigarette smoking
Fecundibility Odds Ratios, whole cohort Women : FOR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.99 Men : FOR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.89-1.40 NS
Selection of twins of opposite sex Women : FOR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.91 Men : FOR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.60-1.55
Cigarette smoking and female fertilityOther aspects
Increase in short / irregular cycles Younger menopausal age (2 years) Increase % of early menopauses (<40 yrs)
Related to level and duration of smoking Multiplied by 3 fo 20 cig / day, 20 years ± reversible
Willett W, Stampfer MJ & Bain C et al. Cigarette smoking, relative weight, and menopause. Am J Epidemiol 1983,117: 651-8
Cigarette smoking and male fertilitySemen
Künzle 2003, infertile smokers Non smokers p n 655 1131 Concentration : 68 (66) 80 (75) 0.001 Motility A : 37.1 (18.6) 38.7 (17.7) 0.07 Normal forms: 21.2 (14.6) 23.7 (15.5) 0.001
Trummer 2002, infertile: n=478 517 109 ExS Round cells (106) : 3.5 (5.3) 2.7 (3.4) 2.6 (3.4) 0.01
Saleh 2002 12 Infert S 21 Infert NS 13 Donors NSLeucocytes (106) 1.8 (0.6-4.4) 0.0 (0.0-0.4) 0.1 (0.0-0.2) 0.01
S=Smokers; NS=Non Smokers; ExS= Ex Smokers
Woman cigarette Smoking and IVF. Retrospective cohort
Non Smoker
(n=351)
Ex Smoker
(n=111)
Smoker
(n=37)
Age 32.9 33.8 31.5
E2 2297 2097 1728*
oocytes 15.4 15.1 14.0
Fertilization rate 54.1 54.1 49.9
Transf Embryos 3.6 3.5 3.6
Implant R (%) 16.4 15.9 6.7*
Van Voorhis BJ, Dawson JD, Stovall DW et al. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:785-791
Woman cigarette Smoking and IVF. Tubal infertility
Non Smoker
≤ 20 (n=351)
Passive Smk
20-50 (n=111)
Smoker>50 (n=37)
Age 32.5 32.7 32.4
E2 1658 1738 981*
Oocytes 5.4 5.4 5.5
Fertilization rate 67.6 57.7 67.9
Transf Embryos 2.4 2.5 2.3
Pregnancy (%) 32.6 33.3 32.9
Smoking classified according to follicular cotinine (ng/ml)Sterzik K, Abt M, Strehler E et al. Human Reprod 1995,10:3213-3217
Woman cigarette Smoking and oocyte quality
Smoking
No
(n=102)
Passive (n=21)
< 15 cig/D (n=37)
≥ 15 cig/D
(n=37)
Age 33.8 32.1 32.2 32.4
Oocytes 10.2 9.5 8.0 7.3*
Fertilization rate 37 47 46 34
Fixed oocytes %
37.8 27.7 55.0 54.1
Diploid (%) 5.1 13.0 12.1 21.1
Zenzes MT, Wang P, Casper RF (Human Reprod 1995,10:3213-3217
Couple cigarette smoking and IVF failure OR
Failure risk
Smoking status Pregnancy Live birth
Both no smoker 1.00 1.00
Couple smoker 2.41 (1.07-5.45) 3,76 (1.40-10.0)
Woman smoker 2.71 (1.37-5.35) 2.51 (1.11-5.67)
Year of smoking 1.09 (1.01-1.16)
Klonoff-Cohen H., Natarajan L., Marrs R., Yee B. Human Reprod 2001,16 :1382-1390
N=221
Woman cigarette smoking and Pregnancy rate
Belaisch-Allart J, El-Akoum ., Mayenga JM, et al. Fertil Steril 1996,66:679-689
Cigarette smoking
No < 10 cig / D ≥ 10 cig / D
OPU 842 133 206
Pregnancies (%) 21.1 20.3 15.1*
Woman passive cigarette smoking and Pregnancy rate
Non Smoker (146)
Passive smoker (40)
Smoker (39)
Age 34.6 (4.0) 33.5 (3.4) 33.6 (3.8)
Ampoules 32.4 (14.9) 30.2 (16.2) 29.2 (14.2)
E2 (pmol/l) 7316 (3721) 7921 (4179) 7142 (3388)
Oocytes 11.1 (5.7) 11.5 (5.6) 11.3 (5.3)
M2 oocytes (%) 77.0 (17.0) 78.0 (18.0) 80.0 (1.0)
Neal MS, Hughes EG, Holloway AC et al. Hum Reprod 2005,20:2531-5 All NS
Woman passive cigarette smoking and Pregnancy rate (2)
Non Smoker (146)
Passive smoker (40)
Smoker (39)
Fertilization rate 63 58 57
Transf. embr 2.3 (0.9) 2.2 (0.5) 1.9 (0.8)
CES* 12 (4) 10 (4) 12 (5)
PR/OPU (%) 48.3** 20.0 19.4
Implantation (%) 25.0** 12.6 12.0
Neal MS, Hughes EG, Holloway AC et al. Hum Reprod 2005,20:2531-5
•Cumulative embryo score•** p<0.05
Cigarette smoking and implantation: oocyte donation
Pregnancy rate according to
smokingNo 1 - 10
cig/j>10 cig/j
Donor (n) 49.9 (401) 52.6 (384) ---
Recipient(n) 51.6 (680) 59.0 (n=61) 34.1 (44)*
S.R.Soares, Human Reproduction 2006785 oocyte donations, Valence, man no-smoker, transfer D32.1 embryos on average (identical in the groups)
*: p<0.05
Meta-analysis 1 (EG Hugues)
13 studies on natural fertility (n=55000) All odds-ratios or relative risks of fertility lower
than 1 except 1 : from 0.3 to 1 7 studies on ART (n=1700)
All odds-ratios of fertility lower than 1 Mean estimate, 0.57 (0.42-0.78)
Hugues EG, Brennan BG. Fertil Steril 1996,66:679-689
Meta-analysis 2 (Augood)
13 studies on natural fertility Mean estimate of risk of infertility among smokers:
OR =1.60 (1.34-1.91) Mean estimate of risk of TTP >1yr among smokers
OR = 1.42 (1.27-1.58)
9 studies on ART Mean estimate of risk pregnancy among smokers
OR = 0.66 (0.49-0.88)
Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton. Human Reprod 1998,13 :1532-1539
Cigarette smoking and infertility Hypotheses
Nicotine Hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis
Early menopause, Estradiol, oocytes number local :
cervical mucus, tubal motility, ciliary function
Other compounds :Cadmium (diploid oocytes ?) Hypoxia: oxydative stress on follicle Marker for tubal infertility
Van Voorhis BJ et al. Tubal infertility in IVF cohort : No smoker 34 %, Ex smoker 57 %, smoker 62 %.
Smoker more sexually active (ACSF)
Conclusion (1)
Decreased fertility (natural and ART)
Probable causal relationship Relation dose-effect, duration-effect Biological plausibility Reversibility at stopping (±)
Some interesting points In utero exposure Probable maternal and paternal effect Passive exposition
Conclusion (2)
Methodological difficulties in measuring exposition Questionnaires, but concealed exposures Biological measurements (cotinine) , expensive Difficulties to measure duration, level Carbon monoxyde tester in expired air
No study with large sample in ART