chris de vries - venmyn deloitte - partnering for power: mining and power generation partnering to...
TRANSCRIPT
Partnering for Power
Mining and Power Generation Partnering to Deliver
Southern Africa’s Energy Needs
Chris de Vries
Venmyn Deloitte
Mozambique Coal Conference – Maputo
28 July 2015
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2
Contents
• Power market disruptors
• Changing power market structures and dynamics
• The Case for Coal IPPs
• Coal IPPs in the Southern African Power Pool
• The Case for Partnership in Coal IPPs and partnership models
• Conclusion: Opportunities in the Coal IPP Sector
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 4
Power Market Disruptors
Source: Sub-Saharan Africa Power Trends – Power Disruption in Africa (Deloitte May 2015) http://www2.deloitte.com/za/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/sub-saharan-africa-
power-trends.html
1
African economic growth,
transformation and rising demand:
• Sub-Saharan Africa is one of the
fastest-growing regions, averaging 6%
growth over the past 15 years
• Reducing the power deficit is crucial in
supporting Africa’s continued growth
Disruptor
#
2
Shifting energy mix gives rise to new
capital and players:
• Energy sources are diversifying,
bringing in new technology vendors,
project developers and funders.
Disruptor
#
4
Renewable technologies:
• By 2020, non-hydro renewables are
expected to increase their share in the
energy mix by a factor of five from
2011 values
• Renewables are evolving to cost
structures that can rival conventional
electricity sources
3
Disruptor
#
Changing role and type of customers:
• Changing structural makeup of players
and stakeholders that will complement
traditional utilities in producing
electricity
• Off-grid and mini-grid solutions
• Self-generation, co-generation and new
generation structures
5
Disruptor
#
Changing market structures and
dynamics:
• Shift from currently centralised
monopolies to unbundled
structures and more decentralised
power generation systems and
models
Disruptor
#
6
Disruptor
# Smarter grids and systems, smarter
utilities:
• Integration of technology and
intelligent solutions in the power
sector is a clear transformation to
more efficient, cost-saving and
‘intelligent’ infrastructure
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 5
Changing power market structures and dynamics
Disruptor…
• Shift from currently centralised monopolies to unbundled structures and more
decentralised power generation systems and models.
• Structural reforms through vertical unbundling, which is the process of ‘unpacking’
integrated utilities into separate generation, transmission and distribution companies,
have been the preferred option.
• Other notable reform options ‘disrupting’ the power sector in the region include
management contracts, commercialisation, IPPs, and electricity regulatory and legislative
amendments.
• Compared to the rest of the world, however, SSA’s reform process is by far the slowest.
To address some of the longer-term issues of energy security, increased regional collaboration will
be crucial. More affordable tariffs and an optimal generation capacity could be developed in the
power sector through infrastructure linkages of power utilities and the regional power pools.
Out of all infrastructure subsectors, power is reported to have the largest annual funding gap, at
more than 70% of required funds for maintenance and new-build projects. Deloitte research shows
that power sector projects by number make up a large share of infrastructure and construction sector
projects at the regional level. This includes 44% of projects in Southern Africa and 39% of projects in
East Africa in 2014.
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 7
The Southern African Power
Pool is facing a net power deficit,
with only Mozambique in a
power surplus, albeit insufficient
to address the regional shortfall
Southern African Power Pool – a regional power deficit
Power deficit
Power deficit
Power deficit
Power deficit
Power deficit
Power surplus
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 8
The age of the IPP
Governments are increasingly looking to the private sector to support energy diversification and
security
Mozambique
• EDM looking to develop two new
hydro projects, but…
• Relying on private sector to develop
coal and gas IPPs
• Have awarded Power Purchase
Agreements (PPAs) to several IPPs
and MOUs with others
Zambia
• 2 PPAs signed with Coal IPPs, one
of which is owned 35% by ZESCO.
ZESCO also signed MOU with
Botswana Coal IPP
Botswana
• 300MW greenfields IPP RFP
• 300MW brownfields IPP RFP
South Africa
• 3725MW Renewable Energy
Independent Power Producer
Procurement Programme
• 2500MW coal baseload IPP
procurement programme
Zimbabwe
• Various greenfields and
brownfields hydro projects
• 22 Licenced IPP projects
• Government developing IPP policy
framework
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 9
The Case for Coal IPPs
• While other energy sources are expected to start
playing a more important role in the energy
supply mix of various countries, coal-fired
energy is likely to remain important in Southern
Africa for some time.
• In particular, the focus on renewable energy
sources such as wind and solar does not provide
the base load capacity of conventional coal
power stations.
• For the time being, well planned and executed
coal power plants still offer competitive capital
intensity.
• Coal-fired power stations provide the quickest
route to high volume growth in the regional
power generation capacity.
The Power Perspective
• IPPs represent an important local offtake source for
coal and this is particularly important since IPPs provide
a ready market for a commodity facing poor export
prices and infrastructure constraints.
• Faced with lower export prices, balance sheet
challenges and infrastructure constraints, becoming an
IPP, partnering with an IPP or having a signed off-take
agreement with an IPP are some ways in which the risk
of operating in the tumultuous coal sector are reduced.
• It is important to de-risk the selling price element of
mining projects. Coal supply agreements to power
stations provide price certainty. They ensure that
companies are not exposed to the vagaries of global
coal indices – the main source of volatility for coal
companies.
• Opportunities to convert waste product to electricity,
maximise resource utilisation, and promote local
beneficiation of waste coal to energy.
The Mining Perspective
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 10
Coal IPPs in the Southern African Power Pool
Planned Coal IPPs
25 Coal IPP projects in 5 countries
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 11
Coal IPPs in the Southern African Power Pool
Coal IPP Capacity Owner
Khanyisa 300MW –
450MW
Anglo Coal (SA) /
ACWA (Saudi)
Kuyasa 600MW –
2000MW
Kuyasa Mining (SA)
Lesedi 300MW Glencore (LSE + JSE listed)
Thabameetsi 600MW –
1200MW
Exxaro (SA) /
GDF SUEZ (France)
Waterberg Waterberg Coal (ASX listed)
Mabesekwa 300MW Shumba Coal (Botswana listed)
Mmamabula 600MW –
4800MW
Jindal Steel and Power (India)
Mmamantswe 600MW –
2000MW
African Energy (ASX listed)
Mookane 300MW Jindal Steel and Power (India)
Sechaba 300MW Shumba Coal (Botswana listed)
Sese 300MW –
600MW
African Energy (ASX listed) /
ACWA (Saudi) /
First Quantum (Canada)
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 12
Coal IPPs in the Southern African Power Pool
Coal IPP Capacity Owner
Maamba 300MW –
600MW
Nava Bharat (India) / Government
of Zambia
Sinazongwe 300MW –
600MW
EMCO (India)
Lusulu 600MW –
2000MW
Pan African Sunlight (France)
Sengwa 300MW –
1400MW
RioZim (Zimbabwe)
Shangano 600MW Southern Energy
Entuba 600MW Makomo Resources (Zim) / Sino
Hydro (China)
Gwayi 600MW China Africa Sunlight (China)
Hwange 300MW –
1200MW
Shanghai Electric (China)
Hwange 600MW Essar (India)
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 13
Coal IPPs in the Southern African Power Pool
Coal IPP Capacity Owner
Benga 300MW –
2000MW
ICVL (India)
Chirodzi 42MW –
300MW
Jindal Steel and Power (India)
Estima 120MW ENRC
Moatize 300MW Vale (Brazil), Mitsui (Japan), ACWA
(Saudi), Whatana (Moz), EDM (Moz)
Ncondezi 300MW –
1800MW
Ncondezi (AIM listed); MOU signed
with Shanghai Electric Power (China)
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 14
Funding partners
The Case for Partnership in Coal IPPs
Technical partners
• Mining Companies
• Power companies
• Technology vendors
• Consultants and
service providers
• Banks
• Development finance
institutions
• Private Equity
• Government
investment
• Equity and debt
capital markets
• Vendor finance
Governments
• National power
companies
• Government equity
ownership
• Government
departments
• Inter-governmental
bodies (Southern
African Power Pool)
Delivering a successful Coal IPP calls for partnerships at a technical, funding and governmental
level. Closer relationships between public and private players in terms of technical and funding
models, as well as regional projects and solutions is a key requirement.
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 15
Source-to-Product Models
Mine Power Station Power Purchaser
“Simple” Model
“Multiple Source”
Model
“Multi generation”
Model
“Multiple Buyer”
Model
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 16
Operational Partnership Models
Mine Power Station Power Purchaser
“Independent”
Model
“Integrated”
Model
“Own use”
Model
“Pool-and-share”
Model
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 17
Funding Partnership models
Equity Debt
Finding the right balance between equity and debt funding…
• Equity markets
• Corporate / vendor equity
• Private equity funds
• Local empowerment equity
• Private off-taker equity
• Public-Private-Partnerships
• Government off-taker equity
• Local banks
• International banks
• Listed and unlisted bond markets
• Development finance institutions
• Vendor finance
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 18
Conclusion: Opportunities in the Coal IPP Sector
Restructuring Utilities Given the restructuring of utilities,
which is encouraging greater
private participation in the African
electricity market, greater
opportunities for private sector
players will emerge, with a
particular focus on sources for
project funding.
Diversified
investment attraction Opportunities also exist
increasingly for non-traditional
funding mechanisms, as
countries seek to supplement
traditional funding mechanisms
that are not meeting project
funding needs.
New-build projects There are various opportunities
within the new build and civil
construction and supply of inputs
environment for power generation
projects in traditional thermal
sectors.
Portfolio optimisation Opportunities exist to work with
national utilities in designing and
implementing optimisation
strategies for both local and
regional generation and
distribution
Southern Africa’s power sector is adapting and rapidly changing in line with global trends and local
realities. While supply to date still continues to fall short of demand requirements, reducing the
current power shortcomings will be crucial in supporting the next chapter of Africa’s growth model.
This makes the market attractive for new entrants. Solutions that are emerging in other parts of the
world will be replicated into the African power sector. A number of global utilities have seen the
continent as a growth market for their businesses, bringing into the market proven technologies that
need localisation.
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 20
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms,
each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms.
Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. With a globally
connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and deep local expertise to help clients
succeed wherever they operate. Deloitte's approximately 170,000 professionals are committed to becoming the standard of excel lence.
This publication is for internal distribution and use only among personnel of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member fi rms, and their related
entities (collectively, the “Deloitte Network”). None of the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person
who relies on this publication.