china development strategy
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
1/24
1
Chinas development
strategy
Lan Xue and
Peter Sheehan
1
In the latter part of the 1990s the discussion of the knowledge economy became
very intense in China, as a perception arose that Chinas continuing developmentwould take place in a quite new world. This discussion was vigorous and influen-
tial at the highest level, but became increasingly diffuse, as different participants
used concepts in very different ways and came to quite different conclusions. The
relevance of the concept of the knowledge economy to the quite specific circum-
stances of China also began to be questioned.
The essays in this volume express this diversity of viewpoints and approaches,
as well as the need to explore the relevance of the knowledge economy to Chinas
situation. By bringing together the work of a range of distinguished Chinese
scholars, leading authorities from the OECD and the World Bank, and authorsfrom Australia and several other countries, we aim to illuminate many different
aspects of this important topic.
This introductory chapter does not seek to summarise or review the individual
papers assembled here the introductions to each part of the book provide sum-
mary information for the interested reader. Rather we set out to address briefly
some of the key questions that have arisen within the Chinese debate, and in
particular to explore the relevance of the knowledge economy to Chinas develop-
ment strategy.
Our central argument is that the knowledge economy, as we interpret it, is of
decisive importance for China. This is because the knowledge economy will provide
a fundamentally different global context for Chinas development, one very
different from the context of recent decades and far removed from that in which
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
2/24
2 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
the developed countries, and even the East Asian Tigers, achieved sustained
growth. This quite new context means, for example, that the traditional develop-
ment strategy based on industrialisation will not be sufficient, as global manu-
facturing becomes highly productive, intensely competitive and providing an ever
smaller share of total employment. It also means that Chinas response to the
knowledge economy will not simply involve a progressive adaptation to the
institutions, systems and policies prevailing in advanced countries and forged in
the industrial era.
New and distinctive approaches to development strategy, which take account of
both Chinas specific circumstances and the new global realities, need to be
thought out as a matter of urgency. Such approaches will require, in our view,
new emphases in a number of areas. These may include directly stimulating
service sector growth; giving priority to employment growth rather than toincreases in output or productivity, and to new product and quality-enhancing
process technologies rather than to labour-saving new process technologies; and
improving rural output and related activities to enable continued high levels of
employment in rural areas.
The development strategies appropriate for the knowledge economy are not yet
understood, certainly not by the present authors. It is our hope that the various
papers in this book, with their diversity of approaches and author backgrounds,
may contr ibute to building such an understanding. In this way they may assist in
addressing the fundamental challenge, facing both China and other developingcountries, of reshaping their strategies to come to grips with the emerging
reality of the knowledge economy.
1. Knowledge economy fever
Background
Starting in April 1997, a fever of knowledge economy discussion swept China,
with the publication of the Chinese version of the OECD report The Knowledge-based Economy (OECD 1997) and other related writings, includingAustralia and
the Knowledge Economy (Sheehan et al. 1997). From the president of the nation
to the ordinary citizen, from the dynamic Pearl River Delta to the vast yellow
plateau in the west, people engaged in energetic discussions and debates on ques-
tions related to the knowledge economy. These debates and discussions were
influenced and shaped by the events that followed, which included, among many
others:
the submission of the report by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) on
Knowledge Innovation to Chinas leadership, and the subsequent approval of
the Academys Knowledge Innovation Project;
the Asian financial crisis and its impact;
the rise and fall of the Internet economy;
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
3/24
Chinas development strategy 3
the backlash about globalisation in many countries; and
the agreement for China to join the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
To some people, the concept of the knowledge economy means a new economic
paradigm, while to others it signifies an entirely new social transformation of
which the economy is only a part. There are also disagreements about the simi-
larities and differences between the concept of the knowledge economy and other
concepts, such as the information economy, the new economy and the networked
economy. Another major debate is about whether it is too early for China to even
talk about the knowledge economy, given that the industrial economy of China is
still in its early development stage.
While all these discussions and debates proceeded, China also felt compelled to
put words into action. With the support of the government, the Chinese Academy
of Sciences started a program named Knowledge Innovation, aimed at restruc-turing the more than one hundred research institutes for which it is responsible
and making them more effective and efficient in knowledge generation and
application. The Ministry of Education has also initiated a program to revitalise
Chinas education system to prepare for the challenges of the knowledge economy
in the new century. More generally, theDecision on Encouraging Technological
Innovation, Developing High-Tech Industry and Realising Commercialisation of
New Technologies taken by the CPC Central Committee and the State Council in
1999 was an example of a high level response to these matters.
Issues of concern
During these debates, and the initial responses to which they have given rise,
three sets of issues have been of continuing concern, as outlined below.
The first set of issues is at the conceptual level. What is the knowledge econ-
omy? Is it a vision for development that can be implemented and realised, or is it
an abstract theoretical concept that should remain in the domain of academia
only? What is the new economy? What is the networked economy? What are the
differences and relationships between the knowledge economy, the new economy,
and the network economy? What is the relationship between the knowledge
economy and the globalisation of the world economy? Does the new economy still
follow traditional economic principles? What are the new rules or principles of
the knowledge economy, if there are any such?
The second set of issues relates to the relevance of the knowledge economy to
China. Why is China so concerned with the concept of the knowledge economy
when it is only now making the transition from an agricultural economy to an
industrial economy? The knowledge economy has often been presented as one
based on a strong science and technology base and on high-tech industries. Given
that China is still lagging behind in these areas and is struggling to provide jobs
for its huge working population, does it make sense to talk about a knowledge
economy? Should China not focus on labour-intensive industries instead? What
is the difference between the knowledge economy and invigorating China
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
4/24
4 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
through science and education (one of the two basic strategies proposed by the
Chinese leadership in 1995)? If the two are essentially the same, why bother to
introduce something new to confuse people?
The third set of concerns questions of implementation. Is the idea of the know-
ledge economy a concept, a theory, or an action plan? How does the concept or
theory guide our action? What are the specific and concrete ideas to implement
the concept of the knowledge economy besides more investment in science,
technology and education? Is it possible to strive for a knowledge economy and
society in some parts of a country but not in the others? Given that the know-
ledge economy is often associated with high-tech and information industries,
what are the implications of the knowledge economy for traditional industry?
It is not possible in this chapter to address all of these important questions
directly. Many of them are taken up, in one way or another, in the other papersin this volume. But we undertake two tasks to give an answer to some of them.
First, we outline an overall approach to the knowledge economy, addressing the
conceptual issues in a way consistent with the bulk of the international literature.
This material is intended to provide a framework in which the relevance and
implementation issues can be addressed. In the remainder of this chapter, we
explore one issue that goes to the heart of such questions the implications of
the knowledge economy for Chinas development strategy.
2. Conceptual issues
To outline a preferred view of the knowledge economy, we start with the key con-
ceptual questions noted above. Clearly concepts can be introduced and defined in
different ways, and there is no absolute answer to these questions. But we outline
below the conceptual approach that, in our view, is both most useful and most
consistent with the best work that has been done in this area.
The concept of the global knowledge economy
The technological and policy realities of the modern world are driving the emer-gence of a quite new set of activities, structures and arrangements in the global
economy. Here we follow OECD (1996) and other authors in describing this
emerging set of activities, structures and arrangements as a knowledge-based
economy, and often use the term the global knowledge economy (see also World
Bank 1998, and Sheehan and Tegart 1998).
The central technological facts leading to the global knowledge economy derive
from the revolution in information technology. They include the ability to deliver
codified knowledge, assembled on a global basis if necessary, very quickly and
very cheaply to the area where it is needed, to transform such knowledge exten-
sively as required and to make it effective in machines and other production
and service delivery processes. The central policy fact is the global trend to the
deregulation of the flow of goods, capital, technology and services, and of national
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
5/24
Chinas development strategy 5
processes of production and distribution. The entry of China into the WTO, and
the policy responses within China to prepare for this entry, are examples of this
policy dynamic at work.
These two factors have had mutually reinforcing effects, and many other forces
are also contributing to shaping the new global economy. The term global knowl-
edge economy makes explicit reference to what we take to be the defining
characteristics of the world economy emerging as a result of these causal factors:
the rise in the knowledge intensity of economic activities and the increasing
globalisation of economic affairs. But this term is intended to refer to the overall
economic system that is emerging, rather than to these characteristics alone.
Thus, as we use the term, the global knowledge economy is neither a purely
theoretical concept nor a vision of development for China. It is a descriptive
concept seeking to express the central reality of the current stage of global eco-nomic development. In our view, and that of many others, the world economy is
moving from the industrial era to become a global knowledge economy. Nations,
whether rich or poor, large or small, need to respond to th is emerging reality, and
to shape their development strategies having regard to it.
One defining feature of the global knowledge economy is the growing incorpor-
ation of knowledge into economic activities involving both goods and services.
Knowledge becomes incorporated in productive activities in many different ways,
ranging from learning by doing by operators on the shop-floor to formal processes
of knowledge generation and application, of training and of investment inadvanced equipment. The economic value of a typical knowledge-intensive good
an advanced aircraft, a drug, a computer or a smart card goes far beyond
the value of the materials of which it is composed, in virtue of the knowledge
embodied in the product. Similarly, services such as medical diagnosis and treat-
ment, education and training, and business consulting rely heavily on embodied
knowledge.
The second defining feature is equally important: the rapid globalisation of eco-
nomic activities. The extraordinary pace of globalisation over the last decade or
so has reflected the intertwined effects of both policy change and developments
in information technology, with the computing and communications revolution
providing the basic infrastructure necessary for rapid globalisation to occur.
The process of globalisation has not involved by any means only increased trade
in goods, although this is of great importance. Indeed, there are at least five
matters involved in globalisation: foreign direct investment, capital transfers
other than direct investment, t rade flows of goods and of services, and knowledge
and technology transfers (Hatzichronoglou 1996). These aspects of globalisation
are of course interrelated. For example, the links between direct investment,
technology transfers and the various trade flows will often be particularly close,
and the growing interrelationship between trade, finance and technology flows is
itself a significant feature of the process of globalisation. Other features include
the existence in all major markets of global competition between competitors
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
6/24
6 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
from all major countries, the increasingly multinational origin of the inputs to
production of both goods and services, and the growth of trade between countr ies
within the same industry and indeed in the same product.
So the answers that we propose to some of the questions about the knowledge
economy noted above are as follows. The global knowledge economy is a new set
of activities, structures and arrangements that is evolving on a global basis, as a
result of the combined influence of the information technology revolution and
sustained policy initiatives to promote openness and deregulation. As such it
represents a new stage of the world economy, subsequent to and in key respects
different from that of the industrial era.
The knowledge economy refers to the new overall structure that is emerging,
together with its associated institutions, activities and arrangements. Attention is
often given to individual aspects of the emerging economy, such as the neweconomy or the online economy, the network economy, the learning economy
and the information economy. But these are specific aspects rather than the overall
reality. The Internet plays an important part in the knowledge economy, and
networks of many different types are also vital. Learning is clearly central to a
knowledge economy, as is the rapid exchange of information and other forms of
knowledge. Innovation, being the process of applying ideas new to the firm in
many different areas, is clearly at the heart of a vibrant knowledge economy. Each
of these concepts views the overall reality of the knowledge economy through a
different lens, thereby illuminating an important part of the picture.The rise of the industrial economy had a major impact, whether for good or ill,
on all countries, radically reshaping the position of nations and the lives of indi-
viduals. Similarly, the knowledge economy will have profound and pervasive
implications, in ways that we cannot yet fully comprehend.
The changing nature of manufacturing
It is not possible here to discuss the many and varied characteristics of the
global knowledge economy. Given our emphasis on implications for Chinas
development strategy, and the focus of that strategy to date on manufacturing, we
explore briefly the changing nature of manufacturing in the knowledge economy.
These matters are discussed further in Chapter 4 in this volume.
Perhaps the most obvious feature of contemporary manufacturing is the con-
tinuing rapid rise in labour productivity , measured as value added per employee.
Reflecting new process technologies, increasing capital intensity and the pres-
sures of global competition, real manufacturing productivity in the major
economies has grown at about 3.5 per cent per annum since 1970, a rate at which
it doubles every 20 years. In Japan, for example, productivity in manufacturing
grew by 3.6 per cent per annum between 1970 and 1998, in spite of much slower
growth in the drawn-out Japanese recession of the 1990s (OECD 2002). Indeed,
between 1970 and 1991 the growth rate was 4.2 per cent per annum. In the USA
real manufacturing productivity grew by 3.3 per cent between 1977 and 1999,
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
7/24
Chinas development strategy 7
with more rapid growth in the 1990s between 1992 and 1999 the growth rate
was 4.6 per cent, a rate at which productivity doubles every 16 years (OECD
2002). By 1999 value added per head in US manufacturing was US$80 000 per
employee in current prices.
This continuing rapid rise in productivity explains why, in developed countr ies,
manufacturing remains central to economic growth in spite of providing a
declining share of total employment. This continued importance is linked to two
other features manufacturing firms are becoming increasingly embedded in
global systems for the creation, production and distribution of goods and manu-
facturing is becoming increasingly integrated with knowledge-intensive services.
Many so-called manufacturing firms are now focused on creating products to
meet identified market demand, and on delivering those products to specific
markets at an appropriate time, place, quality and cost. Given rising productivityand advanced process technologies, the actual production stage is a declining
share of overall value added. Even within pure production companies, the demand
for tradesmen and production workers has fallen relative to that for knowledge-
intensive services such as accountants, process controllers, IT specialists and
managers.
As argued in Chapter 4, these developments may have profound implications
for developing countries such as China. As manufacturing becomes further
integrated with related service-based activities in a global system, it will be
increasingly difficult to separate high-value manufacturing geographically fromits related services. Low-value manufacturing, involving mass production of
standardised items and assembly operations, is being outsourced on a competi-
tive global basis to low-cost locations, as evidenced in the transfer of much of
Hong Kongs final production to Guangdong during the 1990s (Berger and Lester
1997). Such transfer of low-value manufacturing to other areas of China has
accelerated in the last few years, generating hopes that China is becoming the
global manufacturing centre. But higher value, flexible and service-enhanced
manufacturing must be located where it can be integrated with its related services.
Hence it is more likely to be located where there are highly developed service
industr ies, where the customers are, or where there are highly developed infor-
mation and communication technology and transport and distribution systems.
Given these trends, and the progressive opening of world markets, it is becom-
ing increasingly difficult for developing countries to base their development
strategies on globally oriented manufacturing in the knowledge economy. And
even if they succeed, as China has done to date, the pay-off in terms of employ-
ment growth in manufacturing is likely to be modest.
3. Three views of the impact on strategy
In the debate about the knowledge economy and Chinas development strategy, it
is possible to distinguish three broad views. One might be described as the
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
8/24
8 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
irrelevance view: talk of the knowledge economy and of high-tech industrial
development is a dangerous distraction from the central challenges facing China,
that of increasing output and employment in low-tech industries where China
can be competit ive because of low costs. Knowledge economy fever, a disease to
which scient ific and policy elites are part icularly susceptible, can divert attention
from the mundane tasks involved in increasing output and employment in a still
relatively poor economy. It is thus irrelevant to the central issues facing Chinas
development. While this view is often expressed in informal discussions and often
generates intense debates within China, one can rarely find explicit elaboration
of it in open literature in China.
The second view might be described as the enhanced industrial economy view:
the knowledge economy is an enhanced state of the industrial economy, one in
which the roles of knowledge and of global competition are greatly enhanced. Asuccessful knowledge economy is one that fosters effectively the creation and
acquisition of knowledge, and its application to all aspects of economic and social
life. But there is no fundamental change, the knowledge economy being simply
an intensification of processes long under way in the industrial economy. The
broad implication is that China needs upgraded knowledge and skills, especially in
manufacturing and agriculture, and to increase productivity. Hence China
needs to move towards the systems and structures that have proven effective in
advanced economies, and to develop their innovation systems in this direction
over time. A relatively well-defined path is available from the experience ofother nations, and policies are necessary to move vigorously along these paths.
A representative example of this view is the important World Bank publication
China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century (World Bank
2001).
The third view might be described as the global transformation view: that the
knowledge economy represents a fundamental change in the structure and
character of the global economy, one potentially as profound as the original
Industrial Revolution. Thus the strategies appropriate for China and other develop-
ing countries in this new world might be quite different from those successful in
the developed countries and in the rapidly industrialising economies of East
Asian. These strategies need to be thought out anew in the light of both
emerging global trends and the particular characteristics of China. There is no
guarantee that traditional development paths will give acceptable results in the
knowledge economy. A number of the authors represented in this volume
explicitly or implicitly subscribe to this view.
It will be apparent from the discussion above that we hold that the irrelevance
view is not correct. The knowledge economy is not code for high-tech industries,
but is a pervasive transformation affecting every region and all industries. The
clothing and textiles industries provide a good example. Complex processes
involving global flows of technology, design and marketing information, and the
segmentation of product systems are reshaping these industries. The scope for
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
9/24
Chinas development strategy 9
capturing significant valued added within the clothing and textile industries by
competition based on low costs is declining rapidly.
As a result, it is not a viable option for individual countries to ignore the
knowledge economy and to pursue growth in the industries in which they are
cur ren tly cost competitive. The forces of the knowledge economy are transform-
ing those very industries, and the basis of competitiveness within them. Even so,
the concerns that drive the irrelevance view the critical importance of the
employment issue and of low-tech industries in China, and its limited position in
advanced industries remain of central importance. The knowledge economy is
the essential global context within which Chinas development will proceed, but
it is not an excuse for ignoring the basic realities of Chinas situation.
In the remainder of this chapter we explore the issue of whether an enhanced
industrial strategy is viable for China in the emerging knowledge economy, orwhether the more comprehensive redirection of development strategy suggested
by the global transformation view is necessary. To provide the background neces-
sary to address this issue, we document the basic arithmetic of Chinas develop-
ment in the next section.
4. The simple arithmetic of Chinas development
One of the best-known features of Chinas development since the beginning of the
reform movement in 1979 is the very high rates of growth in real GDP whichhave been achieved. As shown in Table 1.1, the average annual rate of growth of
Chinas real GDP was close to 10 per cent in both the 1980s and the 1990s, almost
double the growth rate in the pre-reform decade of the 1970s. Sustained growth
rates of 10 per cent per annum for two decades are comparable with the very best
rates achieved in the countries of the East Asian Miracle, and in stark contrast
to falling levels of real GDP in many transition economies in Eastern Europe
over much of this period. Growth in China moderated during the 1990s, but still
averaged 8.3 per cent per annum between 1995 and 2000. There has been some
questioning of, and a good deal of discussion about, the accuracy of the officialfigures showing these high growth rates (e.g. Maddison 1998; Xu 1999; Rawski
2001). But the responses that have been generated seem to indicate that the high
growth is in large part credible, and our argument is not sensitive to modest
revisions in the official figures.
Real GDP, employment and productivity, by sector
The composition of this growth by broad economic sector1 is also shown in Table
1 In terms of definitions of the sectors, we follow the National Bureau of Statistics of China,although using slightly different terms to designate the three sectors. Thus agricultureincludes farming, forestry, animal husbandry and fishing. Industry is broadly defined tocover mining, manufactur ing, the production and supply of electr icity, gas and water, andconstruction. All other industries are included in services.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
10/24
10 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
1.1. The National Bureau of Statistics publishes data for real growth rates in GDP
(in total and for the sectors) in comparable prices, which involves valuing year
2s net value added in terms of year 1s prices, and so on, on a rolling basis. To
obtain data series expressed in yuan, we have applied (both backwards and
forwards) the published set of annual growth rates to the actual GDP values in
yuan for 1990, to obtain numerical values for GDP and its sectoral components
in estimated 1990 values. (It should be noted that these are not estimates in
1990 prices in the standard sense, namely that each years output has been valued
in the prices of 1990.)
The growth of Chinas GDP has been increasingly dominated by industry, of
which manufacturing is the major component. During the 1980s industrial GDP
grew by 10.6 per cent per annum, and contributed 55 per cent of total real GDP
growth; in the 1990s it grew at 13.6 per cent per annum and contr ibuted 62 percent of total GDP growth. By 2000 industry accounted for 56.5 per cent of GDP.
But the service sector also grew strongly (at 12.6% and 9.1% per annum in the
two decades respectively) and contributed 28 per cent of real GDP by 2000.
While these growth rates are remarkable, even more striking is the fact that in
the 1990s it took 10.1 per cent per annum growth in real GDP to generate only
1.1 per cent growth in employment (Table 1.2), implying overall labour produc-
tivity growth of just on 9 per cent per annum (Table 1.3). In this decade real
industrial GDP increased by 13.6 per cent per annum, but industrial employment
increased by only 1.6 per cent per annum. Employment in agriculture fell by 7.4per cent or 28.4 million over the decade. Thus in this decade China experienced
something close to jobless growth, a phenomenon much discussed in relation to
the developed countries, and a potentially serious issue in a country with such a
massive labour force.
Table 1.1 Real GDP, by sector (estimated 1990 values), 19702000
Agriculture Industry Services Total(100 bil lion yuan, at 1990 values)
1970 2.5 1.2 1.0 4.61980 3.0 2.8 1.8 7.61985 4.3 4.4 3.2 11.91989 4.9 7.4 5.5 17.81990 5.0 7.7 5.8 18.51995 6.1 17.2 9.4 32.72000 7.3 27.5 13.8 48.7Annual growth rates (per cent per annum)197080 2.0 9.1 6.0 5.1
198090 5.3 10.6 12.6 9.319902000 3.8 13.6 9.1 10.1199095 4.2 17.4 10.0 12.019952000 3.5 9.8 8.2 8.3
Sources:National Bureau of Statistics 2001 and estimates of the authors.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
11/24
Chinas development strategy 11
The contrast between the 1970s and the 1990s in this regard is striking
growth in real GDP in the 1970s (5.1%) was only half that in the 1990s, but
employment growth (2.1%) was almost twice the 1990s rate. The difference is, of
course, to be found in the rate of productivity growth, which underpinned the
rapid growth in living standards in the 1990s.
This trend towards jobless growth was in some respect more pronounced in the
second half of the 1990s, as the superheated growth of the first half of the decadeslowed significantly. With real GDP growth of 8.3 per cent per annum between
1995 and 2000, employment grew by only 0.9 per cent per annum, and almost all
of that growth was in the services sector (Table 1.2). Employment in agriculture
and industry combined grew by only 4.9 million or 0.2 per cent per annum over
Table 1.2 Employment in China, by sector, 19702000
Agriculture Indust ry Services Total(million persons)
1970 278.1 35.2 31.0 344.31980 291.2 77.1 55.3 423.61985 311.3 103.8 83.6 498.71989 332.3 119.8 101.3 553.41990 384.2 136.5 118.3 639.01995 354.7 156.3 168.5 679.52000 355.8 160.1 195.7 711.6Annual growth rates (per cent per annum)197080 0.5 8.2 6.0 2.1198089 1.5 5.0 7.0 3.019902000 0.8 1.6 5.2 1.1
199095 1.6 2.7 7.3 1.219952000 0.1 0.5 3.0 0.9
Note:There is a break in the published employment data for China between 1989 and 1990.Employment data for both these years are shown in the table (and also for productivity inTable 1.3), and for these two series the growth rates for the 1980s are calculated between1980 and 1989.Sources:National Bureau of Statistics 2001 and estimates of the authors.
Table 1.3 Productivity (real GDP per employee) by sector, China, 19702000
Agriculture Indust ry Services TotalAnnual growth rates (per cent per annum)
197080 1.5 0.8 0.0 2.9198089 4.0 6.0 6.1 6.719902000 4.6 11.8 3.7 8.9199095 5.8 14.3 2.5 10.719952000 3.4 9.3 5.0 7.3
Note:The growth rates for the 1980s are calculated between 1980 and 1989; see note toTable 1.2.
Sources:National Bureau of Statistics 2001 and estimates of the authors.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
12/24
12 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
the five-year period, whereas employment in services grew by 27.2 million, or 3.0
per cent per annum. In industry, growth in real GDP of 9.8 per cent per annum
generated an employment growth rate of only 0.5 per cent per annum, and all of
this growth was in 1996 between 1996 and 2000 employment in manufacturing
fell somewhat.
This analysis takes the official employment figures as well as the official GDP
figures at face value, and there are many further points that should be taken
account of in a more complete analysis. For example, the process of reform of
state-owned enterprises that began in the latter part of the 1990s meant that
these enterprises began to lay off surplus labour, contributing to the appearance
of jobless growth. This reform process still has a long way to go, however, so that
it will continue to be an important factor through the next decade. There are also
real questions about the accuracy of the industrial classification of employmentin China. For example, with many people moving from the countryside to coastal
provinces such as Guangdong or to the large cities to find employment in indus-
try or services, in some cases their registration may be still in the countryside, so
that they are counted as employed in agriculture. This factor may lead to an over-
statement of agricultural employment relative to employment in other industries.
Our analysis must be interpreted with these and other qualifications in mind.
Employment and productivity growth: The central dilemma
In spite of such qualifications, this trend towards jobless growth, especially inindustry, contributes to perhaps the central dilemma of Chinese development
strategy. Chinas labour productivity levels are low by international standards, in
spite of the rapid growth rates shown in Table 1.3. For example, the World Bank
study cited above (World Bank 2001) reported that Chinas agricultural produc-
tivity (for 199698) was only 75 per cent of that in India and less than 1 per cent
of that in USA or France. It also reported that its manufacturing productivity (for
199599) was less than 5 per cent of that in Brazil, France, Japan or the USA.
Thus there is much room for improvement in productivity levels.
On the other hand, the extent of Chinas employment problem has been well
documented (e.g. Hu 2001). There are massive surplus labour supplies in agri-
culture, still considerable excess employment in many state-owned industrial
enterprises and further growth in the labour force of some 80 million likely during
the decade to 2010. There is thus an urgent need for new job creation. But
during the 1990s nearly 90 per cent of Chinas growth was accounted for by
productivity growth, and only about 10 per cent by employment growth, on the
official figures. Policy initiat ives to accelerate productivity growth, for example by
increasing the uptake of modern technologies in agriculture and manufacturing,
will accentuate the trend to jobless growth and deepen the employment problem.
Hence the dilemma that China currently faces. Increasing productivity in
agriculture and industry has long been the driving force of development and
increasing living standards, but in current circumstances it r isks exacerbating an
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
13/24
Chinas development strategy 13
already very serious employment problem. We argue below that this dilemma is
being intensified for China by the impact of the knowledge economy.
5. Implications for employment and productivity
Structural change in development paths
As is widely known, the Industrial Revolution originated in the UK and that coun-
try was the first in modern times to build an industrial economy. This process
began in the eighteenth century, and was well advanced by 1820. By that year the
share of total employment in British agriculture had already fallen to 37.6 per
cent, and nearly one-third of all employment was in industry (Table 1.4). As the
growth in industry continued to drive the expansion of the economy through the
nineteenth and early twentieth century, the share of total employment located in
industry reached 45.2 per cent in 1929, immediately prior to the Depression, and
by that time the share of agriculture in total employment had fallen to 7.7 per
cent. These proportions remained fairly stable through to the 1950s. But after
about 1970, as the structure of the world economy began to change, industry
began to give way to services in terms of employment by 1999 industry provid-
ed only 22.6 per cent, and services 75.3 per cent, of total employment in the UK.
This broad pattern, of a strong expansion in industrial employment fed by a
transfer from agriculture but sooner or later displaced by surging employment inservices, is apparent in one way or another in the development process of all the
major advanced economies. Germany followed a similar path to Britain a little
later, with the industry share of employment reaching 41 per cent in 1913 and 43
per cent in 1950, before falling to 29 per cent by 1999. The service sector was
important much earlier in the USA, but the industry share rose from 15 per cent
in 1820 to nearly 30 per cent by 1913, and peaked at about 35 per cent in the early
Table 1.4 Share of employment in industry in total employment, selected countries,18201999
UK Germany USA Japan Korea China(per cent of total employment)
1820 32.9 n.a. 15.0 n.a. n.a. n.a.1870 42.3 28.7 24.4 n.a. n.a. n.a.1913 44.1 41.1 29.7 17.5 n.a. n.a.1929 45.2 n.a. 29.4 20.9 n.a. n.a.1950 44.9 43.0 33.6 22.6 n.a. n.a.
1970 39.5 n.a. 28.5 35.3 16.3 10.21985 26.2 37.8 23.3 34.6 34.7 21.71999 22.6 29.4 19.2 32.4 27.4 23.0
Sources:18201950: Maddison 1995, pp. 39, 253; 197093 (excluding China): OECD 2002;National Bureau of Statistics 2001.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
14/24
14 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
1950s. Japans development process began later, and in 1913, 60 per cent of
employment was in agriculture and only 17.5 per cent in industry. But the indus-
try share rose rapidly during the first three-quarters of the twentieth century,
peaking at about 37 per cent in 1973 before declining gradually to 32.4 per cent
in 1998. It is notable, in the light of Japans continuing economic problems since
the early 1990s, that the shift to services has been far slower in Japan than in any
other major economy.
It is interesting to consider the case of Korea in the prime decades of its rapid
development, between 1970 and 1990. In these two decades Korea not only grew
very rapidly (real GDP growing by 8.1% per annum) but experienced rapid struc-
tural change. In 1970, 51.5 per cent of Korean employment was in agriculture
and related primary industries (a figure comparable to that of China in 2000),
with only 16.3 per cent in industry and 32.1 per cent in services. By 1990 theemployment share in agriculture had fallen nearly two-thirds to 18.3 per cent,
with more than half of that decline being reflected in rising manufacturing jobs.
By 1990, 35 per cent of Korean jobs were in manufacturing, while the services
share had risen to 46.7 per cent (OECD 2002).
In other words, even as late as the 1980s Korea was following the traditional
development path in an accelerated fashion, with a pronounced shift of jobs from
agriculture to secondary industry, and also to services. Over a period of only two
decades, the share of jobs in manufacturing more than doubled, absorbing more
than half of the movement of jobs out of agriculture. But in the 1990s the trendreversed equally sharply, with the manufacturing share falling from 35 per cent
in 1990 to 27.4 per cent of all jobs by 1999 (OECD 2002). By that year, 61 per cent
of all Korean jobs were in the services sector.
Thus a developing country pursuing a development strategy based on industri-
alisation in the early years of the twenty-first century faces a much more difficult
task than did a similar country in 1980. Global manufacturing productivity has
doubled, and world markets have become much more open and competitive.
Reflecting higher productivity, industrial employment has fallen in absolute
terms in most developed countries since 1980 and has fallen as a share of total
employment in all these countries. With the rise of global product systems,
advanced count ries are captur ing high-value aspects of the product system, while
outsourcing lower value elements on a competitive basis to low cost countr ies. As
illustrated by Korean trends in the 1990s, these factors must inevitably impact on
the development process.
Changes in Chinas employment structure
Chinas recent experience provides a striking illustration of these trends (Table
1.5 and Figure 1.1). Between 1970 and 1996 the change in employment shares by
industry in China showed the traditional development pattern. There was a
massive movement out of agriculture, and the agricultural share fell from 80.8
per cent to 50.5 per cent. Nearly half of this labour was absorbed in industry, and
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
15/24
Chinas development strategy 15
Table 1.5 Employment shares by sector, China, 19702000
Agriculture Indust ry Services Total(per cent)
1970 80.8 10.2 9.0 1001980 68.7 18.2 13.1 1001985 62.4 20.8 16.8 1001990 60.1 21.4 18.5 1001995 52.2 23.0 24.8 100
1996 50.5 23.5 26.0 1001997 49.9 23.7 26.4 1001998 49.8 23.5 26.7 1001999 50.1 23.0 26.9 1002000 50.0 22.5 27.5 1002001 50.0 22.3 27.7 100
Source:National Bureau of Statistics 2001.
Figure 1.1 Shares of total employment by sector, China, 19912001
Source:National Bureau of Statistics 2001.
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
Per
cent
Agriculture Industry Services
the industry share of total employment increased from 10.2 per cent in 1970 to
23.5 per cent in 1996. The services share increased even more rapidly, rising from
9 per cent to 26 per cent.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
16/24
16 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
But again a str iking change in the pattern has taken place, this time after 1996.
Total industrial employment in China was lower in absolute terms in 2000 than
in 1996, in spite of a 42.5 per cent increase in real industrial GDP over this
period, and the industrial employment share fell from 23.5 per cent to 22.5 per
cent. In other words, all of the output growth in industry over this period was due
to higher productivity, rather than to increased employment. Provisional figures
for 2001 show an absolute rise in industrial employment, but a further fall in the
industrial share of total employment. With agricultural employment basically on
a plateau at close to 50 per cent of total employment, the services share rose at
the expense of the industrial share. Thus over this period China experienced
the employment pattern characteristic of developed countries in recent times a
rising service sector share fed by a declining industrial share, with agriculture
basically fixed. But this pattern was consistent with half the work force being stillengaged in agriculture.
It is too early to interpret these changes with any certainty. But, in the light of
trends in other countries driven by the factors described above, and of specific
features of the Chinese situation, it is possible that the share of industrial
employment in total employment has already passed its peak in China. The
specifically Chinese features include the very low levels of productivity in manu-
facturing, by international standards, the excess labour still engaged in many
state-owned enterprises, and the entry of China into the WTO. In this context,
further falls in the industrial share of total jobs may take place in China, in linewith trends in developed countries. But numerous other factors, such as rapid
growth in low-value manufacturing jobs as a result of Chinas entry to the WTO
and revisions to the system for the industrial classification of employment in
China, could still lead to a different outcome.
In spite of the necessary qualifications, this analysis suggests rather different
patterns of future employment in China than those commonly projected, which
typically show a continuation of the traditional development pattern. One example
is the projections to 2020 contained in a recent World Bank (2001) report. These
projections showed the agricultural share falling from 50 per cent in 2000 to
about 24 per cent by 2020, the industrial share rising from 22.5 per cent to about
28 per cent, and the services share rising from 27.5 per cent to about 48 per cent
(World Bank 2001, Figure 2.4). In the light of global trends, and of the experience
of the 19962001 period, it is likely that the share of industry in total employ-
ment will be substantially lower than anticipated in the World Bank projections
by 2020 and that, while the services share will undoubtedly increase strongly, the
fall in the agricultural share will be much more gradual than in the World Bank
figures.
Is an enhanced industrialisation strategy viable?
The traditional development path is focused on output and productivity growth
in industry and agriculture, through the introduction of advanced technologies,
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
17/24
Chinas development strategy 17
systems and processes. The growth in industrial output is the main factor driving
GDP growth, and the growth of productivity in these two sectors is the key
driver of increased living standards. Growing employment in industry, and also
in the residual services sector, absorbs labour freed by higher productivity in
agriculture as a virtuous cycle of growth is created. There is no tension between
increased productivity reduced employment per unit of output and full
employment, because of rising employment in industry and services. This out-
come is also consistent with mainstream economic theory, in which such a ten-
sion cannot exist because the theory assumes that markets adjust over time to
maintain full employment.
In the case of China, and perhaps of other developing countries, the situation
is now different. A serious conflict has arisen between increased productivity and
adequate growth in employment, and hence between GDP per head and employ-ment levels. In Chinas case, pursuing increased productivity growth in agricul-
ture and industry risks making an already serious unemployment problem much
worse.
This problem is illustrated by the scenarios for real GDP, employment and
growth shown in Table 1.6. They start from the actual 19952000 paths for the
three variables and the three sectors shown in tables 1.11.3. The first row
assumes that the sector specific growth rates for productivity and employment
from 19952000 continue over the period 200010. Given different implicit
weightings for the sectors in the latter period, the aggregate figures are a littledifferent from those for 19952000. This is the base case for the scenarios, which
are constructed by varying the productivity paths and/or the overall economic
growth rate.
The messages that this simple exercise serves to illustrate are clear enough.
First (line 2), if past rates of productivity growth are maintained in the face of
slower growth (here 7% aggregate GDP growth), there would be no employment
growth at all over the decade. Even at recent reduced productivity growth rates,
Table 1.6 GDP, employment and growth scenarios, China, 200010
Annual growth rates, 200010Real GDP Employment Productivity
Continuation of 19952000 productivity growthSustained economic growth 8.6 1.1 7.5Lower GDP growth 7.0 0.0 7.0
Productivity growth enhanced by 20%Strong economic growth 10.1 1.1 9.0
Lower GDP growth 7.0 0.8 7.9Productivity growth lower by 20%
Sustained economic growth 8.6 2.1 6.4Lower GDP growth 6.9 0.8 6.0
Source:Estimates of the authors.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
18/24
18 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
strong overall growth is needed to generate about 1 per cent growth in employ-
ment. Second, if sector productivity growth rates are increased by 20 per cent,
then (line 3) growth in real GDP of about 10 per cent per annum is needed to gen-
erate about 1 per cent growth in employment. However, if these enhanced sector
productivity growth rates are combined with only 7 per cent per annum GDP
growth, the employment outcome is disastrous (line 4), with employment falling
by 0.8 per cent per annum. Third, if sustained economic growth could be com-
bined with 20 per cent lower sector specific productivity growth rates (line 5), the
result is employment growth in excess of 2 per cent. Such a result would
contribute greatly to the resolution of Chinas employment problem. Even with
lower GDP growth (7% per annum, line 6), a reasonable employment outcome is
generated in this case.
These scenarios are arithmetic and illustrative only. They take no account ofeconomic linkages, such as the positive relationship between the rate of eco-
nomic growth and of productivity. But they do illustrate the potential risks to
China if fur ther increases in productivity growth were to be achieved, perhaps as
a result of effective policies to apply advanced technologies throughout the
economy. They also highlight the potential benefits that might accrue were it
possible to combine sustained economic growth with lower rates of productivity
growth than those in the second half of the 1990s.
6. Rethinking a development strategy
How then should we think about a development strategy for China in the know-
ledge economy? This is a fundamental question, which forces one back to the goal
of development, the welfare of the individual and of the communities in which
they are part. Here we make five observations as a preliminary response to this
question.
The service sector as a key focus, not the residual
In traditional development strategies, the focus has been on industry, and to alesser extent on agriculture, while the service sector has been the residual. As a
result, agricultural extension programs are well developed in many countries, as
are structures and processes to facilitate the growth of industry. While the service
sector has been the main generator of jobs in most developed countries for quite
a long time, little progress has been made in terms of the creation of systematic
policies for the service sector. China comes to a position in which the service
sector is a key focus of its strategy at an early stage of its development, with little
international experience to guide it. Indeed, many of the key issues remain
clouded in debate in the developed countries. These include the most effective
roles for the public and private sectors in key service areas such as education and
health, the extent to which market-based roll out of new technologies (such as
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
19/24
Chinas development strategy 19
broadband) biases applications to those in which private returns can be captured
rather than to the most social beneficial applications, and the conditions under
which the service sector can generate high-quality jobs.
In recognit ion of the key role of the service sector, the Tenth Five Year Plan sets
the target for service industry growth over 200005 at 7.5 per cent per annum,
higher than that for overall economic growth. Aggregate employment growth
over the period is set at 45 million or 4 per cent per annum, bringing the service
sector share of employment up from 27.5 per cent in 2002 to 33 per cent in 2005.
To contribute towards the achievement of these formidable targets, the State
Council approved in December 2001 the Policy Suggestions for Accelerating the
Development of the Service Industr ies in the Tenth Five Year Plan prepared by
the State Development Planning Commission, and urged that they be imple-
mented throughout China. These suggestions about ways of upgrading thestructure of the service industries and firms, increasing investment and employ-
ment , reducing entry barr iers, increasing openness to foreigners and so on are
an important first step on a long road that China must travel.
Re-thinking employment, output and productivity growth
In a society in which the labour force is limited and fully employed, the task of
increasing living standards is about increasing productivity. But if a society has a
virtually unlimited labour force, much of which is less than fully employed, then
both the extent of employment and the productivity of the employed are criticalto living standards. This is all the more so when reasonably full employment is
itself an important component of community stability and well-being. For both
these reasons, China is now in a situation in which the level of employment is at
least as central to the living standards of the population as a whole as is the level
of productivity. Indeed, for any given level of GDP growth, China is likely to be
better off the higher the rate of employment growth and the lower the rate of
productivity growth.
It is difficult to think clearly about such a situation, partly because so much
economic theory and debate implicitly assumes full employment, and decrees
that increased productivity is an unambiguous good. This full employment
model, and the traditional development path involving labour transfer from
agriculture to industry, still dominates thinking about development. Sharply
increased productivity is also seen as critical to competitiveness in increasingly
open world markets. But, in response to Chinas present circumstances, it is not
sufficient to say that the goal should be to maximise output and employment
growth, not to maximise productivity growth. Indeed, Chinas experience, both
under central planning and in recent times, has shown that the pursuit of output
growth without regard to quality, value or competitiveness is unsustainable in a
globalised world. The danger is that the resulting output will be neither accepted
by domestic consumers nor saleable in international markets.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
20/24
20 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
Our view is that, in Chinas present circumstances, neither output growth nor
productivity growth should be the central goal. Rather, the central objective
should be sustainable employment growth. This means growth in employment
in firms and other organisations that produce high-quality goods and services
meeting the needs of the domestic markets and/or competitive in international
markets. Given Chinas comparat ive advantage in terms of labour costs and the
global trend to increased knowledge intensity, this means a focus on knowledge-
intensive and labour-intensive products and on technologies that are either
resource saving or value enhancing, but which are not labour saving.
Product and process innovation
Another way of approaching these issues is through the distinction between prod-
uct and process innovation. Product innovations are those that involve the intro-duction of new goods and services into a given market, while process innovations
involve new ways of producing or distributing goods and services. While new
products often get most publicity, process innovations have been of enormous
importance in developed countries, and provide the main reason for the rapid and
continuing growth in industrial productivity documented above.
In an important study, Edquist, Hommen and McKelvey (2002) have argued
that product innovations are generally employment creating, while process
innovations are generally job destroying. In this analysis, process innovations
contribute to increased living standards by reducing the labour required for agiven level of output, allowing the surplus labour to be employed in other firms.
They justify this conclusion by a diverse range of empirical studies, all relating to
the developed countries.
In Chinas situation, the distinction between product and process innovations
seems to be important, on three counts. First, product innovations, including the
introduction of new products to a firms portfolio or to a given market as well as
the creation of entirely new products, appear to offer both output and employ-
ment growth. Second, process innovations of one traditional type cost reducing
through labour saving are likely on this analysis to contribute to Chinas
employment problem. But in a situation of surplus, low-cost labour, process
innovations aimed at cost reduction need not necessarily be labour saving. In this
situation, labour-intensive technologies and processes may offer a more cost-
effective solution than labour saving capital-intensive technologies. But, third,
many new process technologies are about more than cost reductions, delivering
products of higher quality and functionality than existing technologies. While
China may have abundant labour, it certainly needs technologies to enhance the
quality and functionality of its products.
There is no doubt that innovation the application of knowledge and new ideas
to production, marketing and distribution will be central to Chinas develop-
ment. And the nature of that innovation will be critical. It must relate to the
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
21/24
Chinas development strategy 21
specific circumstances facing China, including the depth of Chinas employment
problem. This probably means an increased orientation to product innovation
both the introduction of products new to China and the creation within China of
globally new products and to process innovation based on the efficient use of
low cost labour to improve the quality and value of output rather than on the
minimisation of high cost labour. But the application within China of capital
intensive, labour saving process technologies is likely to be of doubtful benefit.
Higher output and incomes in agriculture
Most countries have, as they have developed, seen the agriculture sector decline
sharply as a source of both value added and employment. In China this sector,
broadly defined, still accounts for 50 per cent of employment and for about 70 per
cent of the population, and its employment share is likely to decline onlygradually in the foreseeable future. Thus agriculture will be critical to economic
development and social welfare in China for a long time to come. However, aver-
age rural incomes are only about one-third of average urban incomes, the
competitive position of much of Chinas agriculture has been declining for some
time, and it is widely held that agriculture will be one of the areas of adverse
impact from Chinas accession to the WTO (Zhong 2002). For example, the
growth of export-oriented manufacturing, and the high exchange rate that it has
made possible, has made farmers more vulnerable to competition in open markets.
New measures to generate higher output and incomes in the rural sector willneed, therefore, to be an important part of a revised development strategy. The
widespread distribution of new technologies aimed at increasing yields and other
forms of output, but not at displacing labour, will continue to be central here.
More generally, the redirection of funds from the industrial sector, and from the
new urban elites, might be necessary to reduce costs and to increase incomes in
rural areas. For example, Zhong (2002) argues that the total burden on farmers
of agricultural tax and a variety of fees and levies amounts to 710 per cent of
their net annual income, even though their incomes are far below the minimum
level for individual income tax. Most of these funds are used to finance rural edu-
cation and other fiscal expenditure at the township and village level. He argues
that substantial relief from these taxes and levies, through national and provin-
cial funding of rural education and other local expenditure, would substantially
reduce production costs and improve farmers incomes. Such an approach might
also be expected to increase the quality of education in rural areas, thereby
improving prospects for non-agricultural employment in these areas.
The welfare of the community
Our final point is that it is critical, with all the emphasis on market-based develop-
ment, to keep in mind the goal of economic development: the welfare of the
individual and of the communities in which they are part. As the experience of
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
22/24
Table 1.7 Selected human development indicators: China and the world
China World
Average Worst Best Low Medium Highprovince province income income income
economies economies economies
Urbanisation (%) 27.5 13.3 70.1 27 60 78Illiteracy rates (%) 13.3 40.0 6.4 49 17 < 5Mean schooling (yrs) 6.1 2.2 8.7 1.6 5.3 11.1Life expectancy (yrs) 68.8 59.1 75.2 56 68 77Infant mortality 30.6 94.6 8.7 89 39 7(per 000 live births)
Sources:Wang Shaoguang and Hu Angang 1999, based on World Bank, World DevelopmentReport 1995and other sources. China data are for 1994; other data are for 1993.
22 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
many developed countr ies demonstrates, this welfare is not to be equated to high
levels of GDP per head many factors other than aggregate economic perform-
ance affect individual and community welfare.
High levels of human development for a given level of per capita GDP have been
a feature of Chinas development path to date. Table 1.7 illustrates this point in
terms of a number of human development indicators, both for China and for all
countr ies classified into three groups by GDP per capita. It shows that, in spite of
still being a low-income country, in 1994 China had lower illiteracy and infant
mortality rates, and higher schooling and life expectancy levels, than the medium
income countries as a whole. For example, the illiteracy rate for China as a whole
was 13.3 per cent, whereas the average for the medium income countries was 17
per cent; the infant mortality rate for China was 30.6 per cent and that for the
medium income countries 39 per cent. Indeed, performance levels in the bestChinese province were comparable with those in some high-income countries.
There are some warning signs, however, in this otherwise proud record. These
lie in the fact that the differences in average outcomes between the best and worst
provinces in China are stark, equal on these measure to the difference between
low-income countries and the lesser performing high-income countries. There
are also signs of increased divergence within some provinces (Wang and Hu
1999), as there are of a more general increase in inequality within China.
Opportunities to access, create and apply knowledge are unequally distributed
across human societies, so that there seems to be a tendency to greater inequalityinherent in the global knowledge economy. An adequate development strategy for
the knowledge economy must address this fact, in particular by ensuring that the
distribution of basic human services such as education and health is as equitable
as possible. Properly used, the new information and communications tech-
nologies could assist in delivering this outcome, allowing China to continue its
proud record in this regard.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
23/24
Chinas development strategy 23
7. Conclusion
In our view, the knowledge economy is neither a feature of advanced economies,
irrelevant to China, nor the most recent enhancement of the industr ial economy.
Rather, it is a quite new stage of the evolution of the global economy, with fun-damental and pervasive implications for every nation, region and firm, and
inevitably with important social implications also.
As such, the knowledge economy poses critical questions for Chinas develop-
ment strategy, especially as the nation prepares to enter more fully into the
global trading system through accession to the WTO. Minor adaptations to the
development strategies of the industrial era, whether as employed by the now
developed countries or by the newly industrialised nations of East Asia, will not
suffice. China must shape its own distinctive development strategy for the
challenges ahead, one that takes full account of Chinas distinctive characteristicsand of the emerging realities of the knowledge economy.
Most technological development in recent centuries has taken place, and con-
tinues to take place, in the developed countries, and hence is shaped to meet the
needs of those countries. In shaping such a revised strategy, and in creating the
new technologies to meet the specific needs of a developing country, China has
some real advantages. In particular, it is in the unique position of being both a
developing country and the second largest economy in the world. Thus, if it is
successful in creating strategies and technologies to meet its own specific needs,
China may also chart a new path for other developing countries in responding to
the global knowledge economy.
Some suggestions about the nature of that revised strategy have been made
above, and many more are to be found in the chapters that follow. But defining
and then outlining the implementation of that strategy is a major undertaking,
one far beyond the scope of such a volume. Our hope is that the studies collected
in this book will make a useful contribution to this historic task.
8. References
Berger, S. and Lester, R. (1997),Made by Hong Kong, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.Edquist, C., Hommen, L. and McKelvey, M. (2002),Innovation and Employment: Process versus
Product Innovation, Edward Elgar, London.Hatzichronoglou, T. (1996), Globalisation and competitiveness: Relevant indicators, STI
Working Paper, OECD, Paris.Hu, A. (2001), Chinas employment problems: Analysis and solutions, World Economy and
China, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1218.Maddison, A. (1995),Monitoring the World Economy 18201992, OECD, Paris.Maddison, A. (1998), Chinese Economic Performance in the Long Run , OECD Development
Centre, Paris.
National Bureau of Statistics (2001), China Statistical Yearbook 2001, China Statistics Press,Beijing.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1996), Technology,Productivity and Job Creation, Paris.
-
8/4/2019 China Development Strategy
24/24
24 Chinas future in the knowledge econony
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1997), The Knowledge-based Economy, Chinese version, Paris.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002), STAN Database, Paris.Rawski, T. (2001), Whats happening to Chinas GDP statistics?, China Economic Review, vol.
12, no. 4, pp. 347354.
Sheehan, P. and Tegart, G. (eds) (1998), Working for the Future: Technology and Employmentin the Global Knowledge Economy , Victor ia University Press, Melbourne.
Sheehan, P., Pappas, N., Tikhomirova, G. and Sinclair, P. (1995),Australia and the KnowledgeEconomy: An Assessment of Enhanced Economic Growth Through Science and Technology,Cent re for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne.
Wang, S.and Hu A. (1999), The Political Economy of Uneven Development: The Case of China,M.E. Sharpe, New York.
World Bank (1998), World Development Report 1998/99: Knowledge for Development,Washington DC.
World Bank (2001), China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21stCentury , WashingtonDC.
Xu, Xianchun (1999), Evaluat ion of adjustments of Chinas official GDP by the World Bank andAngus Maddison,Journal of Econometric Study of Northeast Asia, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 3754.Zhong, F. (2002), Chinas access to WTO: Its impact on Chinese agriculture and rural economy,
paper presented at the 46th Annual Conference of the AARES, Australian Agricultural andResource Economics Society, Canberra, 1215 February.