chhattisgarh mineral development …lncindia.com/s/rr plan/shankarpur bhatgaon mines.pdfchhattisgarh...

CHHATTISGARH MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

LTD.

(GOVT. OF C.G., U / T)

RESETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION PLAN

FOR

SHANKARPUR (BHATGAON II) & EXTN. COAL PROJECT

AT

BISRAMPUR COALFIELD

DISTT. - SURGUJA (C.G.)

NOVEMBER 2009

Resettlement & Rehabilititation Plan For Shankarpur (Bhatgaon ii) & Extn. Coal Project

By: LNC, Raipur, D-8, Sector-2, Avanti Vihar Raipur, C.G. 0771-2443865. 2

RESETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION PLAN

FOR

SHANKARPUR (BHATGAON II) & EXTENSION

COAL PROJECT

AT

BISRAMPUR COALFIELD

DISTT. - SURGUJA (C.G.)

NOVEMBER 2009



INDEX

S.N. DETAIL PAGE NO.

1 ABBRIVIATION 7-10

2 LIST OF MAPS 10

3 LIST OF TABLES 10-12

4 LIST OF CHARTS 13-14

5 CHAPTER – I, GENERAL INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES 15-25

6 1.1 District Surguja 16

7 1.2 District Administration 16

8 1.3 District Statistics 17

9 1.4 The Land 18

10 1.5 Agriculture 18

11 1.6 Double Crop Area 18-19

12 1.6.1 Pattern of Crop Distribution 19-20

13 1.7 District Population 20-22

14 1.8 Forest Area 22-23

15 1.9 Project Area 23

16 1.10 Climate 24

17 1.11 Objectives 24-25

18 CHAPTER –II, PROJECT INTRODUCTION 27-64

19 2.1 CMDC

(Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corporation) 27

20 2.2 Shankarpur (Bhatgaon II) & EXTN. Coal Block 27-28




21 2.3 Objects and Project Description 28-29

22 2.4 Project Background 29-30

23 2.5 About the Company 30

24 2.6 Project Time Frame 30

25 2.7 Brief Project Description 30-36

26 2.8 Fault zones 37-44

27 2.9 Excavation Workshop 44

28 2.10 E and M workshop 45-47

29 2.11 Demarcation of the Project & detail OF area affected 47

30 2.12 Area of project village 48

31 2.13 Description of coal seams 49-51

32 2.14 Description and quality of coal seams 51-54

33 2.15 Summary of seam parameters 54-56

34 2.16 Summary of seam parameters 56

35 2.17 Seam III Bottom (Co-relatable with seam L6 in

Bhatgaon Ext.) 57-58

36 2.18 Summary of seam parameters 58-61

37 2.19 Summary of seam parameters 61

38 2.20 Other local seams in Bhatgaon Ext. 62

39 2.21 Coal reserve 62-63

40 2.22 Geo-mining Parameters 64




41 2.23 Workable seams its thickness, depth etc. 64

42 CHAPTER - III, SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE

PROJECT AFFECTED PEOPLE 66-130

43 3.1 Survey Methodology 66

44 3.2 Social status of the project affected area 66-99

45 3.3 Additional information related R&R policy 2005 of Govt.

of C.G. 100-103

46 3.4 Present status and infrastructure of the project area 104-113

47 3.5 Key Issues-Project Affected People 113-114

48 3.6 Baseline 114-116

49 3.7 Visual Status of the Project Area 117-130

50 CHAPTER – IV, PROJECT IMPACT 132-145

51 4.1 - Details of the area affected 132-145

52 CHAPTER –V, REHABILITATION SCHEME 147-165

53 5.1-. Justification for displacement 147

54 5.2. Social Welfare activities and Development Plan for the

Project affected area 147-148

55 5.3 Employment and other Opportunities 149

56 5.4 Approval and Implementation 149




57 5.5 Definitions 149-150

58 5.6 Compensation 151-153

59 5.7 Land Matters 153-155

60 5.8 Employment and other facilities 156

61 5.9 Self Employment in Agriculture 156-157

62 5.10 Training 157-160

63 5.11 Self Employment Opportunities: 160-161

64 5.12 Details of the land identified for resettlement of the PAP 161-162

65 5.13 Main features of Resettlement Colony 162-162

66 5.14 Monitoring Committees 163-164

67 5.15 Redressal of Grievances 164-165

68 5.16 Implementation Schedule / Execution time frame 165

69 CHAPTER VI, BENEFITS AND REHABILITATION COST 166-217

70 6.1 Direct Benefit from the Project 167-168

71 6.2 Indirect Benefit from the Project 168

72 6.3 Rehabilitation Cost 168-217



ABBRIVIATION

S.N. Short Name Detail

1 ADLT_LT_CT Number of Adult literacy Class/Centre

2 ADLT_LT_CT Number of Adult literacy Class/Centre

3 ALL_DISP Number of Allopathic Dispensary

4 ALL_HOSP Number of Allopathic Hospital

5 ALL_HOSP Number of Allopathic Hospital

6 ANFO

7 Annex Annexere

8 APP_FP Approach - Foot Path

9 APP_MR Approach - Mud Road

10 APP_NAVCAN Approach - Navigable Canal

11 APP_NAVRIV Approach - Navigable River

12 APP_NW Approach - Navigable water-way other than river or canal

13 APP_PR Approach - Paved Road

14 Approx. Approximate

15 AREA_NA_CU Area not available for cultivation

16 AYU_DISP Number of Ayurvedic Dispensary

17 AYU_HOSP Number of Ayurvedic Hospital

18 AYU_HOSP Number of Ayurvedic Hospital

19 BH.No. Bore Whole Number

20 BLOCK_CODE C.D. BLOCK

21 BS_FAC Bus services

22 BSG

23 BT

24 C.G. Chhattishgarh Government

25 CANAL Canal (C)

26 CANAL_GOVT Government Canal

27 CANAL_GOVT Government Canal

28 CANAL_PVT Private Canal

29 CANAL_PVT Private Canal

30 CBBT

31 Chote bade jhadh ka jungle

Revenue Forest

32 CHP

33 CHW Number of Community Health workers

34 CMDC

35 CMPDIL

36 COLLEGE Number of Collage

37 CSEB Chhattishgarh State Electricity Board

38 CULT_WASTE Culturable waste (including gauchar and groves)

39 Cum/T Cubic Metre/Ton

40 CV Cumulative Value

41 CWC Number of Child Welfare Centre

42 Deg Degree

43 DHS

44 DIA Dia meter

45 DIST_CODE District Code

46 DRNK_WAT_F Drinking Water facility (A/NA)

47 E Engineering

48 EDU_FAC Educational facilities (A/NA)

49 Extn. Extension

50 F Female

51 FC

52 FRL

53 FWC_CNTR Number of Family Welfare Centre




54 G.C.V

55 GR

56 GSI Geological Survey of India

57 H_CNTR Number of Health Centre

58 Ha. Hactere

59 HANDPUMP Handpumb (HP)

60 HEMM

61 Higher sc Higher Secondary

62 HOM_DISP Number of Homeopathic Dispensary

63 HOM_HOSP Number of Homeopathic Hospital

64 HOM_HOSP Number of Homeopathic Hospital

65 HP Horse power

66 IND_SCH Number of Industrial School



69 Kcal/Kg Kilo Calore/Kilo Gram

70 Kg/Cum Kilogram/Cubic Metre

71 KL Kilo Letre

72 KLD Kilo Litre/Day

73 Km Kilo meter

74 LAKE Lake (L)

75 LAKE_IRR Lake

76 LAND_FORES Forest

77 LAND_FORES Forest

78 LMVs Light Motar Vehicles

79 LNC Learn Nature Consultant

80 LPD/Capita Litre/Day/Capita

81 lps Litre per second

82 M Mechanical

83 M Male

84 M. Meter

85 M_HOME Number of Maternity Home

86 M_SCH Number of Middle School

87 MAGAZINE Magazine (indicate M, if arrived)

88 Max Maximum

89 Mbgl Meter below ground level

90 Mcum Million Cubic Meter

91 MCW_CNTR Number of Maternity and Child Welfare Centre

92 MDO

93 MECL

94 MECL

95 MEDI_FAC Medical facilities (A/NA)

96 MEDI_FAC Medical facilities (A/NA)

97 Min Minimum

98 MM Mili meter

99 MOC

100 MT Million Ton

101 Mte

102 MTPA Million Ton/Annum

10 MTPA

104 MTY Million Ton/Year

105 N_HOME Number of Nursing Home

106 Nos. Numbers

107 OBC Other Backward Caste

108 OCP Open cost project

109 OTH_CNTR Number of Other medical facilities

110 OTH_IRR Others




111 OTH_IRR Others

112 OTH_SCH Number of Other educational facilities

113 OTH_SCH Number of Other educational facilities

114 OTHER Other drinking water sources (O)

115 P_D Population Density Total population- Persons

116 P_SCH Number of Primary School

117 PF Protected forest

118 PH_CNTR Number of Primary Health Centre

119 PHS_CNT Number of Primary Health Sub Centre

120 POWER_SUPL Power supply (A/NA)

113 PRING Spring (S)

114 Qu. Quintal

115 R&R Rehabitation And Resettlement

116 RANG_STAU If not available, provide the Range Code

117 RBH

118 RF Reserved forest

119 RIVER River Water(R)

120 RIVER_IRR River

123 RIVER_IRR River

124 RMP Number of Registered Private Medical Practiotioners

125 ROM

126 Rs. Indian rupee

127 RS_FAC Railways services

128 S_S_SCH Number of Senior Secondary School

129 S_SCH Number of Secondary School

130 SC Shedule Caste

131 SC_F Scheduled Castes population- Females

132 SC_F Scheduled Castes population- Female

133 SC_M Scheduled Castes population- Males

134 SC_M Scheduled Castes population- Males

135 SC_P Scheduled Castes population- Persons

136 SECL South Eastern Caol Field Limited

137 SMP Number of Subsidised Medical Practitioners

138 SOU_SUMM Source of Drinking Water during Summer (indicate code from above)

139 Sq.feet Square feet

140 Sq.Km Square Kilometre

141 ST Shedule Tribal

142 ST_CODE State Code

143 ST_F Scheduled Tribes population- Females

144 ST_F Scheduled Tribes population- Females

145 ST_M Scheduled Tribes population- Males

146 ST_M Scheduled Tribes population- Males

147 ST_P Scheduled Tribes population- Persons

148 T Ton

149 T_F - Females

150 T_HH Number of Households

151 T_M Total population- Males

152 T_P Total population

153 TANK Tank Water (TK)

154 TANK_IRR Tank

155 TANK_IRR Tank

156 TAP Tap Water (T)

157 TB_CLN Number of T.B. Clinic

158 THSIL_CODE Tahsil/Taluk Code

159 TOT_EXP Total Expenditure

160 TOT_INC Total Income




161 TOT_IRR Total Irrigated Area

162 TOT_IRR Total Irrigated Area

163 TPP Ton/Day

164 TR_SCH Number of Taining School



168 TUBEWELL Tubewell Water (TW)

169 TW_W_EL Tube-well (with electricity)

170 TW_W_EL Tube-well (with electricity)

171 TW_WO_EL Tube-well (without electricity)

172 TW_WO_EL Tube-well (without electricity)

173 UN_DISP Number of Unani Dispensary

174 UN_HOSP Number of Unani Hospital

175 UN_HOSP Number of Unani Hospital

176 UN_IRR Unirrigated Area

177 VHV

178 VILL_NAME VILLAGE NAME

179 VM

180 Vm(Dmmf)

181 W_FALL Waterfall

182 W_P Working Population of the village

183 WELL Well Water (W)

184 WELL_W_EL Well (with electricity)

185 WELL_W_EL Well (with electricity)

186 WELL_WO_EL Well (without electricity)

187 WELL_WO_EL Well (without electricity)

LIST OF MAPS

SL.No. Name /Detail Page No.

1 Project Area-I 23

2 Project Area-II 48

LIST OF TABLES


1 Administrative Setup 16

2 Administrative Units & Area 17

3 Area under Different Crops 19

4 District Population 20

5 Details of Drilling in the Block- I 29

6 Details of Drilling in the Block- II 29

7 Geological succession, Hasdo-Arand coalfield Chhattisgarh 31

8 Sequence of coal seams in Shankarpur coal block 35

9 Details of Exploration 35-36

10 Reserves Allotted Block Boundaries 37-38




11 Reserves Outside the Allotted Block Boundaries 38

12 Total Reserves 38

13 Basic project parameters 39

14 Geo-mining characteristics 39

15 System Parameters(Dragline Application) 39-40

16 System Parameters (Shovel-Dumper Operation) 41

17 System Parameters (Coal Winning Operation) 41

18 Main Mining Equipment 41

19 Proposed Water Consumption of the Project 46-47

20 Extension Coal Block 50-51

21 Range of proximate analysis-I 52

22 Ultimate Analysis-I 53

23 Hard Grove Index-I 53

24 Ash Analysis-I 53-54

25 Proximate Analysis-I 55

26 Ultimate Analysis in %-I 55-56

27 Range of proximate analysis-II 57-58

28 Ultimate Analysis-II 58

29 Ash Analysis-II 58

30 Proximate Analysis-II 59

31 Ultimate Analysis in %-II 60

32 Hard Grove Index-II 60

33 Ash Analysis-III 60

34 Local seams in Bhatgaon Ext 62

35 Coal Reserve in Shankarpur 62-63

36 Workable seams, Thickness and Depth 64

37 Demographic Profile of Project Affected Villages 67-68

38 Affected Population 68

39 Educational Profile 75-79

40 Number of Persons Involved In Different Occupations 80

41 Cultivation Practices in Project Impacted Villages 83

42 Livestock Rearing In Project Impacted Villages 84

43 Income Levels in Project Affected Villages 85-86

44 Asset Ownership 88-89

45 Number of Destitute and Dependants in Project Affected People 90

46 SC/ST in Project Impacted Villages 92

47 Infrastructure Availability-Project Impacted Villages 95

48 Facilities of Drinking Water Supply 96

49 Educational Institutes Within And Near The Village 97-98

50 Community Facilities 98

51 Festivals and Fairs 99

52 Details Of Social Group Matrix Of Affected Families 100

53 Classification of Khatedars based on Land Holding 101

54 Classification of Khatedars based on Percentage land acquired 102-103

55 Area, Population of the Project Area 104

56 Health and Education of the Project Area 107

57 Water and Infrastructure of the study 109




58 Production of the Project area 111

59 Irrigation Facility of the Project area 112

60 Land Use of the Project area 112

61 Displaced Khatedars whose House is being affected 114

62 Villages to Be Affected Due To Project 132

63 Revenue Land To Be Acquired - I 133

64 Revenue Land To Be Acquired -II 134

65 Forest land (revenue record) –II 136

66 Details of the Loss of Structure 138

67 Project displaced persons and land losers 139-140

68 Village Wise Details Of Disturbed Population 141-142

69 Assets: (Drinking Water) 144

70 Implementation of Rehabilititation Plan 152-153

71 Land Matters 153

72 Details of size land to be allotted to be each Khatedars 155

73 Size of plot of land to be alloted 155

74 Rehabilitation Cost Village Mayapur 169-171

75 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Shankarpur 173-176

76 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Bojha 178-181

77 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Songara 183-186

78 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Mohanpur 188-190

79 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Sakalpur 192-195

80 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Tulsi 197-200

81 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Dharampur 202-205

82 Rehabilitation Cost, Village Kotya 207-210

83 Rehabilitation Cost, All Villages Total 212-215



LIST OF CHART


1 Area under Different Crops 19

2 District Population of Surguja. 21

3 District Population of Surguja in %. 22

4 Area of Project Villages (In Ha.) 48

5 Number of House Holds in Project Area 67

6 Affected Villages Population 68

7 Details of Social group Matrix of Affected Population 69

8 Social group Affected Families 69

9 Destitute and Dependents 70

10 Destitute and Dependents in % 70

11 Project Affected People, Average Sex Ratio in % 71

12 Illiteracy Level in Age Group Wise 72

13 Illiteracy Level in numbers 73

14 Illiteracy Level in % 73

15 Persons Occupations 81

16 Persons Occupations in % 82

17 Income Levels 86

18 Income Levels: % of House Holds 87

19 Asset Ownership 89

20 Destitute and Dependants in Project Affected People 90

21 Destitute and Dependants in % 91

22 SC/ST in Project Impacted Villages 93

23 Population in project Affected Villages 94

24 Drinking Water Supply 96

25 Percentages of land holding 102

26 Area, Population of the Project Area 105

27 Village wise Area (in Ha.) 105

28 Total Household 106

29 Health and Education of the Project Area 107

30 Project Area and Medical Facility 108

31 Water and Infrastructure of the Study 109

32 Water Facility of the Project Area 110

33 Land Use of the Project area 113

34 Revenue land to be acquired I 133

35 Revenue land to be acquired II 134

36 Abstract of Land To Be Acquired 134




37 Abstract of Land to Be Acquired in % 135

38 Revenue Forest Land to Be Acquired 136

39 Revenue Forest Land to Be Acquired in % 137

40 Loss of Structure 138

41 Loss of Structure in % 139

42 Project displaced persons and land losers 140

43 Project displaced persons and land losers in % 141

44 Disturbed Population 142

45 Disturbed Population in % 143

46 Mayapur Rehabilitation expenditures 172

47 Mayapur Rehabilitation expenditures in % 172

48 Shankarpur Rehabilitation expenditures 177

49 Shankarpur Rehabilitation expenditures in % 177

50 Bojha Rehabilitation expenditures 182

51 Bojha Rehabilitation expenditures in % 182

52 Songara Rehabilitation expenditures 187

53 Songara Rehabilitation expenditures in % 187

54 Mohanpur Rehabilitation expenditures 191

55 Mohanpur Rehabilitation expenditures in % 191

56 Sakalpur Rehabilitation expenditures 196

57 Sakalpur Rehabilitation expenditures in % 196

58 Tulsi Rehabilitation expenditures 201

59 Tulsi Rehabilitation expenditures in % 201

60 Dharampur Rehabilitation expenditures 206

61 Dharampur Rehabilitation expenditures in % 206

62 Kotya Rehabilitation expenditures 211

63 Kotya Rehabilitation expenditures in % 211

64 All Villages Rehabilitation expenditures 216

65 All Villages Rehabilitation expenditures in % 216



CHAPTER – 1

INTRODUCTION OF AREA



CHAPTER – I

GENERAL INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES

1.1 DISTRICT SURGUJA

The project is situated within district Sarguja. It is located in the northern part of

chhattisgarh state of India. Borders of Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, and Orissa states are

adjoining to the district. This district has over extension between south-eastern parts of

Vindhyachal-Baghelkhand region of peninsular India. It lies between 23o 37‘ 25‘‘ to 24o 6‘

17‘‘ north latitude and 81o 34‘40‘‘ to 84o 4‘40‘‘ east longitude. 244.62 km long east to west

and 167.37 broad North to South. The district has an area of about 16034 sqr km.

1.2 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION:

The head of district administration, collector, governs the district through 19 blocks

in Surguja district, in which, most of the blocks are tribal blocks i.e. Rajpur, Lundra,

Sitapur, Batouli, Mainpat, Wadrafnagar, Pratappur, Ramchandrapur, Balrampur, Kusami,

Shankergarh, Lakhanpur, Bhaiyathan, Ramanujganj, Premnagar, Ambikapur, Udaypur,

Surajpur and Odagi. The administrative setup of the district is as under-

Table: - 1.1, Administrative Setup

NO NAME NUMBERS

1 Tehsil 09

2 Blocks 19

3 Revenue Circle 27

4 Patwari Halka 296

5 Gram Panchayat 977

6 Revenue Villages 1772

7 Police Reserve Center 27



1.3 DISTRICT STATISTICS:

Table: - 1.2, Administrative Units & Area

S.No. Development Block Panchayat. Total Village

1. Ambikapur 78 122

2. Lakhanpur 62 98

3. Udaypur 44 91

4. Ramanujnagar 66 76

5. Surajpur 100 121

6. Premnagar 32 47

7. Bhaiyathan 61 90

8. Odagi 60 99

9. Rajpur 53 86

10. Lundra 66 112

11. Sitapur 36 49

12. Batouli 39 54

13. Mainpat 31 46

14. Wadrafnagar 72 121

15. Pratappur 75 115

16. Ramachandrapur 68 113

17. Balrampur 51 124

18. Kusmi 56 105

19. Shankergarh 40 89

District. Surguja 1090 1758



1.4 THE LAND

The land has been classified into 6 categories. About 41.67% of the total area is

actually developed for agriculture, while about 5.70% remains under fallow lands. Again

about 11.44% of the land may be brought under cultivation by improving the techniques

and reclamation of the marginal area. About 1.27% is barren and uncultivable while

33.09% is in the form of forest, 6.83% land is developed for building, roads etc.

1.5 AGRICULTURE

About 90% of the working population depends on agriculture, in which 50.36% of

working population is engaged in cultivation and 12.77% are agriculture labourer. The rest

working population is occupied in other works.

Agriculture is directly connected with land and water resources. In Surguja, the

percentage concentration of cultivated land is maximum in central zone of the district

stretching East to West direction. In North and south, the percentage of concentration

decreases, because of several factors. The uplands and high lands are mostly covered

with rocky wastelands, infertile soil, woods and scrubs, sloppy and forested area.

Unavailability of water for irrigation over most of area, improper drainage system, difficulty

in digging wells due to rocky basement, poor means of communication, transportations are

hurdles in the path of extension of cultivated land.

1.6 DOUBLE CROP AREA

Double crop area is generally associated with water supply, natural or artificial and

the pressure of population. Wherever the physical condition permits the pressure more

over the land and two crops are raised in a year from the same field. As result, a particular

pattern of use of land resources emerges, which helps in the delineation of planning

regions on the basis of present available resources and the limit of their utilization. Of

course there is no uniformity in the distribution of double cropped area.

Thus most of the concentration is found in two patches

i. Ramanujganj block

ii. Ambikapur & Central North-East of Lundra , Rajpur, Shankargarh, Wadrafnagar and

Pratappur blocks.

Almost whole of the central plain has got medium to relatively high value with few

exceptions due to local condition. In this part, during summer most of the area remains

uncultivated. Only in Ambiakpur block some concentration of double crop area developed



due to irrigation facilities. The per capita land is declining due to the increased rural

population which can be fed by increasing the per acre output through bringing more

cultivated land under double crop system by extending irrigation facilities and using better

fertilizers and better technique .

1.6.1 Pattern of Crop Distribution

The assessment of physical condition for different crops helps in arranging them so

as to derive the optimum return of it. The production of land provided to different crops

depends upon physical suitability of soil and availability of water etc.

Roughly 41.67% out of the total geographical area is under cultivation. The relative

importance of different crops can be studied from the following table and pie chart.

Table: - 1.3, Area under Different Crops

Crops Cereals Oil Seeds Pulses Fruits/Vegetables Others

% of Total shown

area 75.75 12.45

9.88 1.51 0.41

Chart: - 1.1, Area under Different Crops

AREA UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS

Oil Seeds

14%

Fruits/Vegetable

s

2%

Cereals

84%



The above chart shows the percentage of different crop under the area distributed.

Cereals are predominant followed by oilseeds and pulses, but fruits and vegetables are

more important. The distributions of crop, in terms of % are as follows:

1. Cereals -84%.

2. Oil seeds -14%

3. Fruits / vegetables -2%

1.7 DISTRICT POPULATION

Table: - 1.4, District Population

Person Male Female Total

Population -Total 1,000,050 972,044 1,972,094

Population - Rural 928,009 906,904 1,834,913

Population - Urban 72,041 65,140 137,181

Population (0-6) 191,193 186,740 377,936

SC Population 47,931 46,906 94,837

ST Population 541,949 534,720 1,076,669

Number of literates 547,006 326,453 873,459

Number of illiterates 453,044 645,591 1,098,635

Total workers 554,457 427,584 982,041

Main workers 460,649 144,364 605,013

Marginal workers 93,808 283,220 377,028

Non workers 445,593 544,460 990,053

Cultivators 317,081 193,348 510,429

Agricultural laborers 136,327 206,266 342,593



Chart: - 1.2, District Population of Surguja.

The above table denotes the population of different sectors of surguja district.

The total population 1972094,the population of rural is 1834913,the population of

urban is 137181,the population (0-6) is 377936,the population of SC is 94837,the

population of ST is 1,076,669,the population of literates is 873,459 and of illiterates is

1,098,635,the population of total worker is 982041,the population of main workers is

605,013,the population of marginal workers is 377,028,the population of non workers is

990,053,the population of cultivators 510,429,the population of Agricultural laborers is

342,593.

DISTRICT POPULATION OF SURGUJA

1,000,050928,009

72,041

191,193

47,931

541,949453,044

554,457460,649

93,808

317,081

136,327

326,453

645,591

445,593

547,006

283,220

144,364

193,348206,266

544,460427,584

534,720

46,906

186,740

65,140

906,904972,044

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

Pop

ulat

ion

-Tot

al

Pop

ulat

ion

- Rur

al

Pop

ulat

ion

- Urb

an

Pop

ulat

ion

(0-6

)

SC P

opul

ation

ST

Pop

ulat

ion

Num

ber o

f lite

rate

s

Num

ber o

f illite

rate

s

Tota

l wor

kers

Main

wor

kers

Mar

gina

l wor

kers

Non

wor

kers

Cultiv

ator

s

Agr

icul

tura

l lab

orer

s

VARIABLES

NU

MB

ER

S



Chart: - 1.3, District Population of Surguja in %.

The above chart shows the population of different sector of surguja district.the

percentage of population in rural area a compared to urban area is uppermost that is 16%

and 1% respectively. The population (0-6) is 3%, population of SC is lowest as compared

to ST population that is 1% and 10% respectively. Majority of illiterates population is 10%

and that of literates is 8%.percentage of total workers is 9%.the percentage of main

workers is maximum as compared to non workers that is 3% and 9%.the percentage of

cultivators is 5% and that of agricultural laborers is 3%.

1.8 FOREST AREA

About 58% of the area in the district lies under forests. The total geographical area

being 18,188.44 sq km. and the forest occupy 10,849.+079 sq Km. the flora of Nazzul and

other areas are changing frequently with the human activities and land-use.

In Surguja rainfall varies between 100-200 cms, mean annual temperature260C-

270C and humidity 60-80% resulting monsoon deciduous forests. The tree of such forests

shed their leaves during spring a dearly summer when the storage of water is more acute.

Reductions of sub-soil water table not enough to allow the trees to keep their leaves all the

year-round. These forests are the most important forests, yielding commercial timberland

various other forest products of high value.

DISTRICT POPULATION OF SURGUJA IN %

Main workers

7%

SC Population

1%

Total workers

11%

Population - Rural

19%

Agricultural

laborers

4%

Marginal workers

4%

Non workers

11%

Population (0-6)

4%

ST Population

12%Number of

literates

9%

Population -

Urban

1%

Number of

illiterates

12%

Cultivators

5%



FOREST AREA (Sq.Km.)

Geographical Area

(Area in sq. K.m)

Forest Area (Area in sq. K.m)

Total Forest Reserved

Forest

Unreserved

Forest Uncategorized Forest

27037.053 14948.963 5621.252 8311.207 1016.509(55.29%)

1.9 PROJECT AREA

The Project is proposed in 9 villages of block Surajpur and Ambikapur.Two villages

namely Tulsi and Mohanpur falls within the block Ambikapur and rest 7villages Sakalpur ,

Shankarpur,Mayapur, Bojha,Dharampur, Songara and Koteya comes within the

administrative boundary of block Surajpur.

The geographical location of the project area is shown in the following map.

Map: - 1.1, Project Area



1.10 CLIMATE: The climate of district is characterized by a hot summer and well distributed rainfall

during the monsoon season. With its general monsoonal character, the region according to

thornthwait's classification falls in the Tropical Thermal belt assigns it the grassland type

character.

Climate, soil and biotic factors are the functions of natural vegetation. According to

Trewartha's classification the Surguja falls in AW class which is based on temperature and

vegetation. The symbol AW denotes Tropical Swanah region. The chief feature of this

climate is long dry period average monthly temperature rising over 18 0C, through

maximum summer temperature may even go up to 46 0C. In winter the temperature will not

go below 18 0C .The monsoon bring sufficient rains.

The location on tropic of cancer results tropical climate with high pressure belt

throughout the year, but due to its height above MSL controls its high temperature. The

district is about 700 km from ocean therefore oceanic effect still remains zero , Whereas

it's location in southward of Himalaya is about 500 km which protects it against cold winds

blowing from Northern belt.

1.11 OBJECTIVES :-

The main purpose of the rehabilitation policy is to extend appropriate compensation

and at the same time making such arrangements for their dwelling and employment so as

to make their position equal to or better as before the project. For this purpose specific

provisions have been made for the following:-

Allocation of alternative land and /or appropriate compensation for their acquired

land and other immovable assets before displacement of affected person from

the project.

Establishing well planned accommodation for such families which are affected

by project and whose accommodation is required as per the ―An Ideal

Rehabilitation Policy 2007 of State of Chhattisgarh (As amended)‖.

To make arrangements for employment to the one eligible member of project

affected families as per the ―An Ideal Rehabilitation Policy 2007 of State of

Chhattisgarh (As amended)‖..



To make arrangements of supervision and monitoring of rehabilitation works in

order to ensure that the rehabilitation of the project affected persons/families

shall be according to the ―An Ideal Rehabilitation Policy 2007 of State of

Chhattisgarh (As amended)‖.

DEFINITION:-



CHAPTER – 2

INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT



CHAPTER – II

PROJECT INTRODUCTION

2.1 CMDC (CHHATTISGARH MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION)

Chhattisgarh is known to be the richest State in the country in terms of mineral

wealth. The state-owned Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corporation(CMDC), singly or

in joint venture, undertakes scientific exploration, commercial exploitation and viable

trading of minerals in the State and ensures that the natural wealth which the state is

endowed with, is transformed efficiently into prosperity for its people, in general and the

country at large.

Ministry of Coal (MOC), Govt. of India, in its memorandum no. 13016/8/2007-CA-1

dt. 25 July 2007, allocated Shankarpur (Bhtgaon II) & Extn. Coal block under the

Government company dispensation for commercial extraction of coal by CMDC

themselves or with its participation through a separate company which shall be

necessarily a Government company eligible to do coal mining as per the provisions of Coal

Mines (Nationalization) Act 1973. The Company such formed shall be free to sell its

produced coal except to the consumers of Coal India Limited/SCCL against their existing

linkages.

Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. (CMDC Ltd.) has its registered

office at Sona Khan Bhawan, Ring Road No.-1, Raipur, and Chhattisgarh. PIN: 492006

2.2 SHANKARPUR (BHATGAON II) & EXTN. COAL BLOCK

The block is situated in the Bisrampur Coalfield in the command area of South

Eastern Coalfields Limited. The block is spread over a combined area of 33.63 sq.km with

a geological reserve of 80.13 million tones.

The co-ordinates of the block are:

Latitude - 23°16‘54‖ N (south boundary) to 23°21‘54‖ N (North boundary)

Longitude - 83°03‘00‖ E (West boundary) to 83°08‘06‖E (East boundary)

Topo-sheet No. 64 M/3

The coal block is 22 kms North East of Bisrampur town and the nearest railway

station is Ambikapur on the South East Central Railway which is approximately 27 kms

away from the block. The state highway no. 5 connecting Ambikapur and Varanasi passes



over the western part of the coal block. Ambikapur is also the district town of the Surguja

district.

The area is generally plain land - topography having occasional mounds. The

surface elevation ranges from 512m above Mean Sea Level (MSL) to 558m above Mean

Sea Level (MSL). Galphuli nala flows from south to north in the southern part of the coal

block. The nala forms the western boundary of the northern extension of the block. A

number of small seasonal tributaries end up into the nala which finally meets the westerly

flowing Mahan river in the north side of the block.

A number of small seasonal tributaries join the Galphuli nala. This ultimately meets

the westerly flowing Mahan River in the north which controls the drainage of the region.

The climate is tropical. The minimum and maximum temperatures hover around 2°-

4°C and 35°C, respectively, in winter while temperature in summer varies between 16° Min

to 45° Max.. Meteorology data suggests the average annual rainfall as 1436mm.

2.3 OBJECTS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(i) OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT

The project is to produce coal from the block and cater to coal requirement of

prospective consumers on commercial basis.

The main objective of the project is to supply coal to the 1000 MW Power project of

the JV Company (ICPL) of IFFCO & CSEB and to supply coal to the local steel / sponge

iron / cement industries located within the state of Chhattisgarh.

The rated capacity of the project as envisaged in the mining plan is 2.0 Million

Tonnes per annum (MTPA) of which 1.8 MTPA shall be produced by opencast method

and the underground mine is envisaged to give an output of 0.2 MTPA.

The coal block and its immediate surroundings are free from any mining activities

and the coal seams are totally virgin. Some mines of SECL are, however, in operation, in

some distance (3-10 Kms) from the block.

Detailed exploration has already been carried out by competent agencies and

status of drilling in the block and other follow-up actions are tabulated below:



Table: - 2.1, Details of Drilling in the Block –I

Exploration

Agency

Bore hole

series

Drilling Type of

exploration

Status of

documentation No. of

BHs

Meterage

drilled

GSI BSG 7 1675.86 Regional All data

incorporated in

geological reports

MECL BT 123 11094.25 Detailed

CMPDIL CBBT 100 9900.70 Detailed

Total 230 22670.81

Table: - 2.1, Details of Drilling in the Block –II

Item of work Bhatgaon-II Bhatgaon Extn. Total block

i) Geological mapping

(R.F 1:4000)

21.2 sq.km 12.43 sq.km 33.63 sq.km

ii) Topographic survey

(R.F 1:4000)

21.2 sq.km 12.43 sq.km 33.63 sq.km

iii) Core drilling 12770.11m*

(130 bore holes)

9900.70

(100 bore holes)

22670.81m

(230 bore holes)

2.4 PROJECT BACKGROUND

Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. envisages the establishment of

a captive opencast coal mine over the land of villages Shankarpur, Koteya,Bojha,

Mayapur, Mohanpur, Shakalpur, Songara, Dharampur in District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.

The coal mine will operate within the "Shankarpur Block". The annual coal production is

likely to be about 6.0 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). M/s. Chhattisgarh Mineral

Development Corporation Ltd. (CMDC Ltd.) is intending to supply coal to the 1000 MW

Power plant of ICPL, a JV company of the IFFCO & CSEB at a distance of 6 km from the

mine site.

The block has an estimated 317.00 million tonnes (MT) of net in-situ proved

geological reserves of which 252.08 MT will be mineable. CMDC Ltd. will acquire land

outside the block boundary also to meet the requirement of OB dumping and area for



some facilities. In this area outside the allotted block boundary about 0.06 MT of coal

reserves are indicated.

The detailed exploration in Shankarpur Block of Hasdo - Arand Coal field has

established the presence of four regionally persistent and co relatable coal seams via.

Seam – V, IV, III and II occurring in descending order. A local seam designated as seam

L-1 occurs between seams II and II A in the block. Also, a thin coal band occurs above

seam V in few boreholes in the block. The general dip of the beds is southerly, the amount

being 5 to 8. The average run of the mine (ROM) coal is non-coking E grade.

2.5 ABOUT THE COMPANY

Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. (CMDC Ltd.) has its registered

office at Sona Khan Bhawan, Ring Road No.-1, Raipur, and Chhattisgarh. CMDC Ltd. is a

wholly owned Chhattisgarh State Government Undertaking. It intends to mine the

Shankarpur Central Block for supplying coal to the 1000 MW power project of the JV

company of IFFCO & CSEB at Premnagar in District – Surguja (C.G.) .

2.6 PROJECT TIME FRAME

As per the time schedule provided by ministry of Coal Govt. of India. The production

has to be started within 36 months from the date of allocation of the coal block. Ministry

has allocated Shankarpur Coal Block to CMDC on 14.08.2003 so the project has to be

started by the end of August 2006. But to delay in handing over of the geological report by

CMPDI the project has delayed for almost 2 years. Now the new target for the starting of

project has been fixed as April 2008.

2.7 BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

(a) Regional geology

(i) General

The Hasdo-Arand coalfield extends over an area of about 1200 Sq.km between

latitudes 22°39' to 20°57' (N) and Longitudes 82°21' to 83°39'(E), covering Korba and

Surguja districts of the Chhattisgarh state.

The Hasdo-Arand coalfield is bounded on the north by a vast stretch of Talchir rocks and

gneisses, on the east by the Main Pat Plateau, while coal measures of Trans-Mand sector

and Mand-Raigarh coalfields lie to the south and south east of it, respectively. The Korba



coalfield lies to the south west of the Hasdo-Arand coalfield separated by a vast stretch of

Kamthi and Talchir formations rocks. This coal basin is a part of the Son-Mahanadi master

Gondwana basin and has a prominent fault along the major part of its southern periphery

bringing Talchir formation and Precambrian rocks in juxtaposition with Barakars, while

towards north, the coal measures rest conformably on the Talchir sediments.

The generalised geological sequence of the coalfield is given in Table 2.2

Table 2.2:- Geological succession, Hasdo-Arand coalfield Chhattisgarh (From GSI bulletin, series a. No. 45)

Age Formation Lithology

Recent ………….. Soil and Alluvium

…..…….Unconformity ………

Cretaceous Deccan Trap Basic Flows and Dykes

Upper

Supra Barakar Sandstones, Ferruginous shales

Permian Beds (Kamthi ?) Buff cherty sandstone and a few

To Lr. Triassic (?) (200 m +) Pebble bands

…...….Disconformity………

Barakar carbonaceous Feldspathic Sandstone,

(30 m – 400 m +) Shale and coal seams with

boulder conglomerate at base

Permian Karharbari (100m) Sandstone, shale with coal

Upper carboniferous

to Lr. Permian (?)

Talchir (100m –15m) Diamictite, green sandstones,

Khaki-green shales

……….Unconformity……...

Precambrian Porphyritic granite, gneisses and

quartzites.



The Hasdo-Arand coalfield is highly rugged in the southern part. Within the

coalfield, the Raigarh Pahar (966 m) and the Mahesh Pahar (938 m) stand out in bold

relief from the surrounding plain, the general elevation of which varies from 457 m to 548

m above MSL. The rugged terrain to the south is dissected by deep gorges. In the valleys

Talchirs are exposed.

Within the coal seams, numerous occurrences of sandstone dyke have been reported

(Chowdhary and Basu, 1969). In width, the dykes range from a mere stringer to as much

as a metre. These sand stone dykes point to emplacement of sands in hydro-plastic

stages along the fracture and weak planes in the coal seams.

(ii) Structure

The Hasdo-Arand Coalfield shows a broad similarity of structural set-up with that of

the adjoining Korba Coalfield. The southern boundary of the coalfield is delineated by an

east-west boundary fault, which brings the coal measures in juxtaposition with the

Precambrian and Talchir rocks on the south. Near the boundary fault, the Barakar

sandstones are highly silicified and have given rise to continuous ridges. Along the

northern boundary of the coalfield, the coal measures rest conformably on the Talchir

Formation. As such, the basin shows a half-graben configuration.

The general dip of the beds is southerly, the amount being 5° to 8°. In the vicinity of

the southern boundary fault, a reversal of dip towards north is recorded. Locally, the beds

show low rolling dips. The unevenness of the basement topography is manifested as

hummocky inliers of Precambrian rocks within the Gondwana Formations. In the eastern

part the strike swings towards NW-SE. Similar swing in the strike is also recorded from the

Salaigot and Sitipakhna areas in the western part of the coalfield.

(iii) Coal seams

The available surface and sub-surface data of Hasdo-Arand Coalfield have

established the existence of six correlatable coal seams viz. V/Ketma, IV/Morga,

III/Dhajag, II/Bisrar and IIA/Paturia, I/Sagbari, in descending order. Besides, at least six

thin local coal seams, one occurring between seams IV/Morga and III/Dhajag, another

occurring between seams II/Bisrar and II/Paturia while the next four local coal seams

occurring below Seam I (Bottom)/Sagbari are locally persistent. These local coal seams

occurring below seam II/Bisrar have been numbered as L-5 to L-1 descending order.

(b) Local Geology

The block is mostly covered by soil and alluvium of residual nature. Only the

Barakars are exposed in Shankarpur Central block and is free from dolerite and mica-



peridotite intrusions as in none of the boreholes drilled by MECL in the block or during

geological mapping, these have been noticed.

(i) Description of formation

The description of different geological formations encountered in boreholes drilled

by MECL in the block is given below.

Soil/Alluvium

Shankarpur Central block is mostly covered with soil, ranging in thickness from 0.00

to 6.00 m. and is of residual nature. It is generally yellowish to brownish in colour.

Weathered Mantle

The weathered mantle constitutes the soil and the weathered rocks belonging to

Barakar Formation. The depth of the weathered mantle within the block ranges from 6.00

to 36.40 m.

Barakars

Barakars shows transitional contract with the underlying Talchir Formation.

Barakers comprise dominantly of sandstones with subordinate shales, carbonaceous

shale and coal seams. The sandstones are generally grayish, medium grained to gritty

with kaolinised feldspar as cementing material and are friable in nature. The shales are

rather insignificant in the sedimentary column and are grayish in colour. Coal seams from

prominent horizons within the sandstone dominated cycles. The Barakars have been

intersected in all the boreholes drilled in the block and its thickness varies from 12.00 m. to

236.50 m.

(ii) Structure of the block

Vast areas in the northern, western and central parts of the block are free from any

structural disturbance as the faults are mostly located in the eastern and southern parts of

the block.

The strike of the coal seams is N 72° E-S 72° W near southern-eastern corner,

becomes almost E-W in the southern part, takes a swing westward as N 55° W-S 55° E in

the south-western part and becomes almost N-S in the western part. The strike than takes

a gradual swing eastward and becomes N 22° - 32° E to S 22° - 32° W in the north-

western part, and becomes almost E-W in the north-central part of the block.

The dip of the coal seams varies within narrow limit i.e. from 0° to 5.4°. The beds

are almost flat/horizontal at the centre of the basin. The maximum dip of 5.4° is observed



over a very small area in the eastern part between faults F.3 and F.5. However, over vast

area in the southern, western, northern, eastern and central parts, the beds dip between 2°

to 3°.

Due to formation of bowl shaped basin in the south central region of the block, the

base of which is elongated in almost E-W direction and cut-off at the eastern end due to a

major fault (F.3), the coal seams show centripetal dips (towards the centre from all sides

except eastern side). Thus the coal seams show northerly dip in southern part, easterly dip

in western part and southerly dip in northern part of the block.

(iii) Fault

The Shankarpur Central block is traversed by seven normal, gravity faults

designated as fault F1 to F7 from north to south and one minor slip (MS-1) for seam III in

borehole MTC-57 to explain reduction in seam thickness.

These faults are confined roughly to the eastern half of the block. Out of seven

faults, only one fault (F3) is major, high intensity, fault with throw increasing upto 120 m

and is intersected in borehole No. MTC-64 at the depth of 231.35 m. All other faults are

low intensity faults with throw upto 24 m. Two faults (F1 and F6) have southerly throw, 3

faults (F2, F4 and F7) have northerly throw, while fault F5 has easterly throw. Fault F3

shows northerly throw in northern part and easterly throw in the eastern part of the block.

(c) Description of coal Seam

The detailed exploration in Shankarpur Central block of Hasdo-Arand Coalfield has

established the presence of four regionally persistent and co relatable coal seams viz.

seam – V, IV, III and II occurring in descending order. In addition to the above, a local

seam designated as seam L-1 occurs between Seams-IV and III and one between Seams

II and IIA in the block. Moreover an impersistent, thin coal band also occurs above Seam V

in few boreholes in the block. All these seams occur within Barakar column.

Among all the seams present in the block only the three seams viz V. IV and III

have attained workability in the block. Of all the seams, Seam III is the most persistent and

highly developed and occurs throughout the block, generally in two sections separated by

prominent shale parting of 0.40 m to 0.80 m thickness. The upper part is designated as

Section III (Top) and the lower part as Section III (Bottom). Only in 12 boreholes (MTC-10,

14, 62, 70, 76, 98, 115, 122, 131, MTW-6, MT-12 and 25), the parting between the Top

and Bottom sections of the seam III exceeds 1.0 m. and as these boreholes are spread

over large area and do not together form any continuous appreciable area/zone except

around a few boreholes in north-eastern part.



Seams V and IV are also persistent and show good development in the block.

It was noticed in the initial boreholes that that seams below III have mostly not

developed/attained workable thickness in the block similar to that of nearby Gidmuri and

Paturia blocks.

The sequence of coal seams in Shankarpur Central Block is given in Table 2.3

Table: - 2.3, Sequence of coal seams in Shankarpur coal block

Sequence of

Seam/parting

Ranges of Thickness

(m)

Range of Parting

Thickness

No. of

Intersections

Min Max Min Max

V Parting 0.16

(MTC-81)

2.45

(MTC-19)

12.46

(MTC-71)

24.76

(MTC-13)

122

IV Parting 0.25

(MTC-33)

5.10

(MTC-71)

0.48

(MTC-43)

4.81

(MTC-151)

143

Local (L-I)

Parting

0.09

(MTC-89)

1.90

(MTC-53)

25.78

(MTC-69)

34.56

(MTC-58)

130

III (Merged)*

Parting

7.05

(MTC-137)

10.29

(HAT-27)

13.15

(MTW-5)

18.89

(MT-15)

189

II Parting 0.10

(MT-10)

0.62

(MTW-5)

34.06

(MT-15)

39.25

(MTW-5)

5

II A Parting 0.05

(MTC-2)

1.23

(MT-10)

- - 9

* Including sections III (Top) and III (Bottom)

(d) Details of Exploration

The details of the exploratory work undertaken in the block have been presented in the

Table 2.4

Table: - 2.4, Details of Exploration

Sl.No. Item of work Work done

1. Geological Mapping 24.0 Sq.km

2. Surveying

(a) Determination of R.L. of boreholes

(MECL)

158 Bhs. (MTW-1 to 6 and

MTC-1 to 152)



Sl.No. Item of work Work done

(b) Determination of co-ordinates of

boreholes (MECL)

158 Bhs. (MTW-1 to 6 and

MTC-1 to 152

(c) Topographic Survey (R.F. 1:4000) with

2.0 m. contour interval

24.0 Sq.km.

3. Exploratory drilling

(a) Present phase MECL 16296.15 m. in 158 Bhs. (MTW-

1 to 6 and MTC-1 to 152)

(b) Old boreholes MECL 2189.50 m. in 21 Bhs.

GSI 4668.45 m. in 13 Bhs. (HAT-4,

6, 7, 8, 9, 20, 21, 22, 25 to 28

and 32)

Total 23154.10 m. in 192 Bhs.

4. Geological Core Logging 16296.15 m. in 158 Bhs. (MTW-

1 to 6 and MTC-1 to 152)

5. Coal Core sampling 1642.90m in 152 boreholes

6. Chemical Analysis

(a) Band-by-band 1642.90 in 152 Boreholes

(b) Seam overall (at 60% Rh and 40°C) 391 nos. from 63 boreholes

(c) Special Test For GCV, HGI, Ash analysis,

AFT and Ultimate analysis

7. Physico-Mechanical tests (at CMPDIL,

Ranchi Lab.)

One borehole (MTC-141)

8. Geophysical logging 4524.00 m. in 37 boreholes

(e) Reserve estimation

(i) Method of reserve estimation

Seam correlations have been used to identify the seam roof and seam floor and

generate the seam roof and floor grids along with the structural interpretations.

Thicknesses used for reserve estimation are based on borehole-by-borehole, seam

wise assessment of workable thick nesses. These thick nesses have been used to model

the thickness grids of coal seams for reserve assessment.

The minimum workable thickness for the estimation of reserves of individual seam

has been considered as 0.05 m.



2.8 Fault zones

Fault zones were modeled and coal within the heave interval excluded from reserve

estimates.

2.8.1 Weathering and sub crop

Coal occurring within the weathered portion of the sequence was excluded from

reserve estimates.

No reserves have been estimated for seams II, Local and IIA due to their poor

development in the block.

An overall deduction of 10% is applied to the gross tonnage estimated for each

sector to arrive at the net-in-situ reserves of coal to account for unforeseen data gaps,

wash out zones, abrupt change in seam thickness etc.

2.8.2 Area considered for reserve estimation

For all the seams, the up dip limit and the down dip limit for the purpose of reserve

calculation have been taken as per the details given below and the reserves have been

estimated within the limits of the Shankarpur Central block.

The up dip limit has been fixed by the in crop of the floor of each seam. The down-dip limit

is the block boundary.

A. Reserves within the allotted block boundaries

Table: - 2.5, Reserves Allotted Block Boundaries

1. Net in-situ proved geological reserves 317.33 Mt.

2. Net in-situ proved geological reserves not considered for mining

in the 45 m mine periphery

(a) Along in crop 0.02 mt.

(b) Along Western mine boundary 4.73 mt

(c) Along South-Eastern mine boundary 3.47 mt

(d) Along Dip side mine boundary 2.01 mt.

Sub Total (A.2) 10.23 mt

3. Net in-situ proved geological reserves Blocked in the batter

(a) Along in crop batter 0.02 mt

(b) Along western batter 11.66 mt

(c) Along South-Eastern batter 8.95 mt.

(d) Along Dip side batter 6.43 mt.



Sub Total (A.3) 27.06 mt.

4. Total net in-situ proved geological reserves not considered for

mining (A2 + A3)

37.29 mt

5. Mineable Reserves (A1-A4) 280.04 mt.

6. Mining Losses @ 10% of (A5) 28.00 mt.

7. Extractable Reserves (A5-A6) 252.04 mt.

B. Reserves outside the allotted block boundaries

Table: - 2.6, Reserves Outside the Allotted Block Boundaries

1. Indicated geological reserves considered outside the allotted

block boundaries

0.06 mt.

2. Indicated geological reserves blocked in the batter 0.016 mt.

3. Mineable Reserves (B1-B2) 0.044 mt.

4. Mining Losses @ 10% of (B3) 0.004 mt.

5. Extractable Reserves (B3-B4) 0.04 mt.

C. Total Reserves

Table: - 2.7, Total Reserves

1. Geological Reserves (A1 + B1) 317.39 mt.

2. Mineable Reserves (A5-B3) 280.084 mt.

3. Extractable Reserves (A7+B5) 252.08 mt.

The extractable reserve base of 252.08 million tonnes of coal, assessed based on

the Geological Report on Exploration for Coal, Shankarpur Central Block (Non-CIL)

prepared by MEC, will sustain a mine life for a period of 45 years for a production capacity

of 6 MTY.



The basic Project Parameters of the proposed mining block are given in Table 2.8

Table: - 2.8, Basic project parameters

Sl.No. Parameters Unit Value

1. Geological Reserves of Shankarpur Central Block Mt 317.33

2. Extractable reserves in the delineated Mining Block Mt 252.08

3. Average Coal quality Grade E

4. Volume OB Mcum 1714.14

5. Stripping ratio Cum/t 6.80

6. Target Capacity Mt 6.00

7. Mine life Year 45.

(f) Mining

Geo-mining characteristics of the block are given in Table 2.9

Table: - 2.9, Geo-mining characteristics

Sl.No. Particulars Unit Min Max Usual

1.0 Strata thickness

1.1 Soil m. 0.5 6.0 3.08

1.2 OB m. 12.94 97.95 58.26

1.3 Seam thickness m.

Seam V 0.47 2.45 1.47

Seam IV 0.51 4.23 2.05

Seam IIIT 0.73 3.70 2.70

Seam IIIB 2.47 7.40 5.59

1.4 Parting m.

Between Seam IV and Seam V 12.12 24.76 17.57

Between Seam IIIT and Seam IV 28.81 53.61 34.20

Between Seam IIIB and Seam IIIT 0.14 3.02 0.64

2.0 Seam Gradient deg 0.5 5.4 2-3

3.0 Specific Gravity

OB T/cum - - 2.20

Coal T/cum



Sl.No. Particulars Unit Min Max Usual

Seam V - - 1.67

Seam IV - - 1.64

Seam IIIT - - 1.55

Seam IIIB - - 1.57

4.0 Coal Quality

Seam V - - Grade F

Seam IV - - Grade E

Seam IIIT - - Grade E

Seam IIIB - - Grade E

(i) Mining method

Selection of mining method, mining equipment and layout for this project are based

on the geo-mining characteristics, site conditions, target capacity and optimisation of

mining operations.

The most suitable mining technology for opencast mining will be using a combination of

Draglines and Truck and Shovel system, considering the following:

(a) Gentle gradient of seam floor, viz. 2° - 3°.

(b) Average thickness of the parting between seam III and overlying Seam IV

being of the order of 30-35 m, which can be very easily handled by

dragline with side casting.

(c) Least cost of production

Shovel dumper system for higher benches and dragline on the parting above seam

III has been proposed, as this is most suitable under the given geo-mining conditions.

(ii) Sequence of mining

The mine will start from the in crop and gradually advance to dip side. The mine will

be worked in two pits, Eastern and Western. The draglines will start from central sump and

proceed towards flanks. A central haul road of 70 m width has been proposed in each pit

which divides the mine into two flanks or sections. The coal of seam III will be transported

up to the receiving pit through the central haul road. The average gradient of central haul

road will be 1 in 16. Coal from the upper seams will be transported through the flank haul

roads.



(iii) Mining system

Considering the geo-mining characteristics of the deposit, the mine is proposed to

be worked by dragline and shovel-dumper combination of mining systems. Overburden

bench immediately above seam III is proposed to be handled by dragline. The height of

dragline overburden bench will vary as per coal exposure requirement. The rest of

overburden/parting is proposed to be excavated by shovel dumper combination. The coal

from all the three seams is proposed to be extracted by shovel and transported to

receiving pit by coal body rear dumpers. The proposed mining system parameters are as

follows:

Table: - 2.10, System Parameters (Dragline Application)

Sl. No. Particulars Unit Value

1. Bench height M 20-35

2. Working bench width M Upto 70

3. Non-working bench width M 30

4. Bench slope Deg 70

5. Blast hole dia MM 250

6. Inclination of blast-holes - Vertical

7. Powder factor Kg/cum 0.60

Table: - 2.11, System Parameters (Shovel-Dumper Operation)


1. Bench height M Upto 15



4. Bench slope Deg 60-70

5. Blast hole dia MM 160-250





Table: - 2.12, System Parameters (Coal Winning Operation)


1. Bench height M Upto 8



4. Bench slope Deg 70-80

5. Blast hole dia MM 160



(g) Blasting

The standard practice involving the electric detonators for the initiation of detonating

cord, detonating relays to achieve hole-to-hole delays, use of Heavy ANFO, slurry or

emulsion explosives as the column charge will be used for Blasting.

Blast hole drills of 250 mm and 160 mm dia will be used for drilling in OB/partings

and coal benches.

(h) Main Mining Equipment

The likely requirement of main mining equipment to be deployed in the project for

achieving the target capacity of coal production is as given in Table 2.13

Table: - 2.13, Main Mining Equipment

Sl. No. Equipment Size Population

Overburden

1. Walking Draglines 24/96 2

2. Rope/Hydraulic Shovels 10 cum 5

3. Hydraulic Shovels 4.5 cum 1

4. Rear Dumpers 100 T 35


6. RBH Drills 250 mm 9


8. Dozers 850 HP 2

9. Dozers 320 HP 7



Sl. No. Equipment Size Population

Coal

1. Hydraulic Shovels 4.5 cum 3



4. Dozers 320 HP 2

5. Wheel Dozers 350 HP 4

Common

1. FE Loader 5-6 cum 2

2. FE Loader 1-2 cum 1

3. Dozers 320 HP 1

4. Water Sprinkler 28 KL 3

5. Hydraulic Backhoe 1.0 cum 2

6. Tipping Trucks 8 T 4

7. Mobile Cranes 40/18/8 T 3

(i) Mineral Beneficiation

The average ROM coal is non-coking E Grade. No beneficiation is proposed.

(j) Site and Services

CMDC, as owner and operator of the Shankarpur opencast mine; will provide the

infrastructure necessary for its operations and for the well being of its workforce. It is also

expected to provide infrastructure improvement for the local community. Among the

infrastructure that will be provided are roads, workshops and stores, water management

structures and machinery, potable and industrial water supplies, offices, communications,

housing for the workforce, housing for people displaced by mining activities, and transport

to and from work for most employees.

It will be necessary to relocate the Bilaspur-Ambikapur State Highway which

traverses the block. In additional to this, some unmetalled roads and cart tracks

connecting the villages to the state highway and traversing the Shankarpur will also need

to be diverted/relocated.



Since the production from Shankarpur opencast mine is largely for captive use,

there may be some sharing of facilities with the power plant.

(i) Coal handling facilities

The CHP has been designed to handle 6.00 mt per annum. It is proposed to

transport coal from face to receiving pit by rear dumpers. Primary crusher has been

provided for sizing of ROM coal from 1200 mm to 200 mm and then secondary crusher will

crush the coal from 200 mm to –100 mm. Sized coal will be transported to the power plant

by conveyors. Necessary facilities like dust control system; plant cleaning system, etc. has

also been envisaged.

(ii) Mine facilities

For maintenance and repair of equipment deployed in the project, workshop facility

has been envisaged.

Facility planning required for workshop of opencast project of 6.0 MTY capacity has

been done to meet maintenance requirement of equipment and storage of spares, sub-

assemblies and consumables.

Facility planning is based on following scope of services:

2.9 Excavation Workshop

- Preventive Maintenance

(a) Daily maintenance, routine lubrication and bi-weekly washing of equipment

(b) Inspection

(c) Incidental minor repairs of assemblies and sub-assemblies of mining and mechanical

equipment i.e. dumper, dozer, shovel, RBH drill, etc.

- Scheduled Maintenance

- Medium repair and replacement of assemblies and sub-assemblies.

- Mobile repair and maintenance facilities with maintenance crew for field equipment at

site.



2.10 E and M workshop

- Minor repair, medium repair and replacement of components, assemblies and sub-

assemblies of CHP equipment, pumps and other electrical and mechanical equipment.

- Daily washing of LMVs and washing of equipment assemblies and sub-assemblies as

and when required.

- Periodical lubrication.

- Repairs and replacement of components / assemblies for LMV.

- Minor and medium repair of switch gears, motors, self-starters and other electrical

equipment.

- Battery charging facilities and reconditioning of batteries.

A combined complex has been envisaged for HEMM, E and M workshop and stores

(iii) Power supply, fuel consumption and communication system

Heavy Earth Moving Machines consume significant power in open cast project

(OCP). Coal handling Plant including crushing and material handling facilities, mine

dewatering, workshop, offices, colony, etc. add to the total power demand of the project.

On achieving the targeted coal production and commissioning of dragline, shovels, drills,

coal handling plant, workshop and main pumps, the power demand of the OCP is

expected to touch the maximum demand.

It is proposed that the opencast project will get power from CSEB substation and

power will be distributed at 33 kV to the project. The fuel consumption will be for diesel-

operated machinery to the tune of 64.2 TPD for three shift working.

Illumination

The lighting systems is envisaged to cover:

- Mine Area

- Mine Haul Road

- Coal handling facility

- Workshop

- Auxiliary buildings and electrical rooms

- Buildings perimeter

- Yard and roads

- Administration building and offices

- Colony



Communication and Management Information System

For effective management of different production and service units and for ensuring

safety, the following communication facilities will be provided:

- Surface Mine Communication System

- Mine Management Information System

- Internet

- LAN

(iv) Civil construction

In view of about 45 years of life of the project, the residential and service buildings

will be built to permanent specifications.

The Service Buildings include community buildings like dispensary, primary school,

officers‘ and staff rest houses, clubs, post office, bank, shopping center, community center

etc. apart from offices, workshop and stores, sub-stations, dragline/shovel erection yard,

magazine and other statutory buildings like canteen, first aid center, rest shelter, training

centers, pit head bath etc.

Potable water required for the colony and the water required for the industrial and

fire-fighting purposes will be stored in the colony and industrial bulk reservoirs

respectively. It has been considered that from these colony and industrial bulk reservoirs,

water would be distributed to the points of consumption through water supply networks.

A centralized sewage plant will consist of sewage pumping station, aeration tank,

settling tank, sludge drying beds etc. with all necessary electrical and mechanical

equipment.

(k) Manpower

The annual working days will be 330 days. Number of shifts in a day will be 3 of 8

hours each. Approximately 1,300 persons will be required for operation of the mine.

(l) Water Requirement

This is an opencast mine, hence the predominant water requirement will be for

sprinkling. The break up of the water requirement for the project is given in Table 2.14

Table: - 2.14, Proposed Water Consumption of the Project

Sl.No. Use Qty. (KLD) Remarks

A. Mine

1 Sprinkling 409 68.19 KLD / MTPA of coal



Sl.No. Use Qty. (KLD) Remarks

2 Workshop 8* 2 KLD / HEMM and others

3 Drinking and sanitation 58.5 45 lpd / capita

Sub Total 475.5

B. Peripheral villages 20.0 Lump sum

C. Colony 615.0 910 families x 5 x 135 lpd

GRAND TOTAL 1110.5

Total water being circulated in workshop is 40 KLD. 32 KLD will be re-used after oil

& grease removal. Hence, 8 KLD make up water will be required. Vehicles will be washed

every 3rd or 4th day only.

2.11 DEMARCATION OF THE PROJECT & DETAIL OF AREA AFFECTED

(Corresponding to Section 1.2 & 1.5 of Annex -2 of CG Model R&R Policy -2005)

A. Demarcation of the Project

The Shankarpur block is situated in the western half of the Hasdo-Arand Coalfield.

Administratively, the block falls in Surguja district of Chhattisgarh and is about 66 km SW

of Ambikapur, the district headquarter. Bilaspur town is about 157 km SW of the block.

The Shankarpur Block covers an area of about 24.0 Sq.km. and is situated in the

western half of the Hasdo-Arand Coalfield, about 6 km north of Gidmuri block. The area

falls in the Survey of India Topo-sheet Nos. 64J/9 & 64J/13 of R.F. 1:50000 (however, the

major part falls in the former and a small part in the east in the later)



Map:-2.1, Project Area -II

2.12 AREA OF PROJECT VILLAGE

The village area falling within project as per the census 2001 is depicted through

the following bar chart;

Chart: - 2.1, Area of Project Villages (In Ha.)

The legal boundary of 9 villages covers 4328 ha. area out of which 3363 ha. falls

within the Coal Block.

438

603

304 291

584

956

544

731

407

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

IN H

AC

.

VILLAGES

AREA IN HA.

Mayapur Bojha Songara Shankarpur Shakalpur Koteya Dharampur Tulsi Mohanpur



2.13 DESCRIPTION OF COAL SEAMS

Exploration in the southern part (Bhatgaon-II) of the allocated block revealed the

presence of five co-relatable horizons as seam-III top, III bottom, II, L1 and I named after

the GSI nomenclature in Songara area. Detailed exploration in the Extension part

(northern) revealed the existence of ten coal horizons which includes the above older

seams as well as younger horizons. Although sequences of the coal seams remain same

for both northern and southern parts, the nomenclature of the seams is different. The

nomenclature and sequence of coal seams in Bhatgaon-II (southern part) and Extension

(northern part) block as recorded in the GR is given below:

Nomenclature of coal seams

Bhatgaon-II Bhatgaon Extension (Bojha)

--- IX

--- L8

--- L7 Top

--- L7 Bottom

III Top VIII

III Bottom L6

--- VII

II L5

L1 VI

I V

Out of the five coal seams in Bhatgaon II, three seams i.e. III top, II and L1 are

persistent and considered for reserve estimation. Seam III Bottom and I are im-persistent

and thin. Similarly out of the ten seams in the Extension block, only three seams i.e VIII,

L6 and VI are persistent and developed. In the Shankarpur (Bhatgaon-II) and Extension

coal block, the coal seams occurring in the south part of the block i.e. III Top, III Bottom, II,

L1 and I are correlated with coal seams VIII, L6, L5, VI and V respectively occurs in the

northern part of the block as per GR. The seams VIII, L6 and VI are persistent and

considered for reserve estimation. The other seams are im-persistent and not considered



for reserve estimation. The sequence of coal seams with parting and thickness as

recorded from drilling data in both Bhatgaon-II and Extension coal block are given below.

Table: - 2.15, Sequence of Coal Seams Intersected In Bhatgaon-Ii & Extension Coal

Block

Bhatgaon-II Extension (north part) Bhatgaon-II (south part)

Seam Thickness No. of B.Hs

intersected


intersected Parting Min Max Parting Min Max

IX Top 0.38 0.85 5

Parting 2.26 4.25 5

IX

Middle

0.10 1.04 7

Parting 1.40 2.17 7

IX

Bottom

0.40 5.08 8

Parting 16.6

0

20.25 5

L8 0.05 1.70 23

Parting 11.7

4

21.70 17

L7 Top 0.05 1.30 33

Parting 2.04 9.28 28

L7

Bottom

0.05 2.00 45

Parting 6.40 15.27 46

VIII 0.29 3.50 65 III Top 0.45 2.93 76

Parting 1.76 9.06 59 Parting 2.24 8.00 --

L6 0.06 2.20 61 III Bottom 0.06 1.20 70

Parting 20.1

6

28.30 13 Parting 14.85 40.29 --

VII 0.02 0.63 18 --- --- --- ---



Bhatgaon-II Extension (north part) Bhatgaon-II (south part)


intersected


intersected Parting Min Max Parting Min Max

Parting 4.10 11.28 11 --- --- --- ---

L5 0.05 1.40 65 II 0.02 2.61 103

Parting 16.2

0

25.37 53 Parting 10.51 46.13 --

VI 0.03 2.00 80 L1 0.03 1.84 62

Parting 28.9

0

39.01 16 Parting 18.39 44.32 _

V 0.05 0.45 18 I 0.02 1.13 50

2.14 DESCRIPTION AND QUALITY OF COAL SEAMS:

The description of the coal seams in ascending order i.e. from oldest to the

youngest occurring within block is given below.

Seam-I (Co-relatable with Seam-V in Bhatgaon Ext. )

It is the oldest coal seam in the block and occurs below the Seam L1(Co-relatable with V

in Extension) with a parting range of 28.90m to 39.01m in the northern part and 18.39m to

44.32m in the southern part of the block. The seam has been encountered in 68 bore

holes. It is poorly developed, im-persistent and occurs in isolated patches. It has not

attained workable thickness anywhere in the block, hence of no economic importance in

the block.

Seam L-1 (Co-relatable with Seam VI in Bhatgaon-II Ext )

This coal seam is developed in the northern part (Bhatgaon-II extension) and northern as

well as eastern portion in the south (Bhatgaon-II).

Bore hole intersected – 142 nos.

Depth of intersection

Roof Floor FRL

i) Shallowest - 44.00m (CBBT-43) 45.00m 496.73m

ii) Deepest -134.00m (CBBT-70) 134.35 389.34m

Stratigraphic position

SeaProject area-1(VI) occurs below seam II (seam L-5) and above seam I (Seam V)

Parting with underlying seam



Minimum-18.39m (BT-98), Maximum-44.32m (BT-43)

Seam thickness – ranges from 0.03m to 2.00m.

Incrop The seam does not in crop within the block.

Roof & floor The roof is represented by medium to coarse grained sandstone with

subordinate shale. The floor is represented by sandy shale and medium to coarse grained

sandstone.

Dirt bands The seam is devoid of dirt band. However, one dirt band is seen in a few bore

holes in thickness from 0.04m to 0.33m.

Proximate analysis

Table: - 2.16, Range of proximate analysis –I (on 60% RH and 49oC)

Parameters No. of Bore

Holes

considered

Range Remarks

Minimum Maximum

Moisture % 104 5.17 10.24

Ash % 104 6.4 48.61

VM % 54 25.00 41.60

FC % 54 39.40 54.90

UHV (kcal/kg) 104 1478 6847

Grade 104 G A Mostly D to A.

G.C.V (kcal/kg) 55 4645 6718

Long flame

characteristics

23 B4 B5 Predominant B5



Table: - 2.17, Ultimate Analysis - I

Parameters No. of Bore Holes considered

Range in %

Minimum Maximum

Carbon 13 49.4 81.2

Hydrogen 13 2.8 5.0

Nitrogen 13 0.9 1.7

Sulphur 13 0.30 0.70

Oxygen 11 5.1 13.9

Total sulphur 1 0.60 ---

VM (dmmf) 17 27.2 32.0

CV(Kcal/kg) (dmmf) 50 7543 7889

Table: - 2.18, Hard Grove Index (HGI) - I

No. of Bore

Holes

Seam thickness range Nature of

sample

Range

Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum

7 0.90m 1.85m Bcs/I30 37 61

Ash Fusion Temp. Range (oC) No of BHs Range

i. Initial Deformation Temperature (I.D.T) 9 1080 to >1400

ii. Hemi spherical Temperature (H.T.) 9 >1400

iii. Flow Temperature (F.T) 9 >1400

Ash Analysis (Constituents %)

Table: - 2.19, Ash Analysis -I

BH

no. SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 TiO2 P2O5 SO3 CaO MgO MnO4

Alk.by

diff

BT-18 60.47 28.36 4.68 1.86 0.05 0.54 1.69 1.37 --- 0.98

CBBT-

22 53.12 29.87 6.86 2.00 0.22 0.34 3.58 2.01 0.04 1.96

CBBT-

51 50.40 30.57 8.71 2.00 0.27 0.22 3.02 1.45 0.04 2.00

CBBT- 58.00 29.30 4.43 1.50 0.02 0.18 4.70 1.85 0.04 1.66



BH

no. SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 TiO2 P2O5 SO3 CaO MgO MnO4

Alk.by

diff

57

CBBT-

75 57.06 27.86 7.46 2.00 0.31 0.28 2.68 0.96 0.02 1.40

2.15 Summary of seam parameters

i. Coal seam L1 (seam VI) is developed in the northern and eastern part of Bhatgaon II,

where as it is not developed in the south-east and south-west area (west of state highway)

within the entire block boundary. It has been intersected in 142 bore holes. The seam

does not in-crop within the block.

ii. The thickness of the seam ranges from 0.03m to 2.0m. The predominant

thickness range is 0.50m to 1.50m

iii. The total reserve of the seam within the block is 18.581 Mte., out of which proved

reserve is of 17.447 Mte and indicated reserve is of 1.134 Mte. The grade ranges from A

to E, but 89% of total reserves are of A to C grade.

Coal seam II (Co-relatable with Seam L-5)

This coal seams is developed in the southern part of the block (Bhatgaon-II) only.

Borehole intersected – 168 nos.

Depth of intersection Roof Floor FRL

i) Shallowest - 13.66m 13.88m 524.40m

ii) Deepest - 116.35m 116.55m 410.52m


Seam L5 occurs below seam VII in the northern part of the block where as its

equivalent seam II in the southern part occurs below Seam III bottom (Co-relatable with

L6) as there is no seam in the south part equivalent to Seam VII. It occurs above seam L1.


Minimum -10.51m (BT-55) Maximum -33.08m (BT-83)

Thickness - Thickness ranges from 0.05m to 2.61m.



In-crop - The seam in-crops within the block.

Roof & floor - The roof is represented by medium to coarse grained sandstone. The floor

is representing by shale and sandy shale.

Dirt bands In most part the seam is devoid of any dirt band. However, only one band

ranging in thickness from 0.03 m to 0.13m has been observed in about 10 bore holes in

the southern part.

Table:-2.20, Proximate Analysis - I

Parameters No. of BHS

considered

Range Remarks

Minimum Maximum

Moisture % 113 4.92 9.5

Ash % 113 7.2 40.36

VM % 40 24.9 38.9

FC % 40 34.0 54.4

UHV (kcal/kg) 113 2614 7118

Grade 113 F A Predominant

grade A to B.

G.C.V (kcal/kg) 36 5227 6624

Long flame

characteristics of coal

group

6 B5 B5

Table:-2.21, Ultimate Analysis in % - I

Parameters % No. of BHs

considered

Range

Minimum Maximum

Carbon 9 51.9 80.4

Hydrogen 9 3.1 4.9

Nitrogen 9 1 1.6

Sulphur 9 0.3 0.6

Oxygen 5 9.1 12.7

VM % (dmmf) 1 36.1 ---



Parameters % No. of BHs

considered

Range

Minimum Maximum

CV (Kcal/kg) (dmmf) 30 7648 7895

Hard Grove Index (HGI)

The value of HGI in one bore hole only is 43.

Ash Fusion Temp. Range (oC) No. of B H Range


ii. Hemi spherical Temperature (H.T.) 7 1180 to >1400

iii. Flow Temperature (F.T) 7 1200 to >1400


Coal seam II (co-relatable with seam L5) is encountered in 168 bore holes in the

block. The seam is persistently developed in the southern part whereas L5 is not

developed. However it has attained mineable thickness in isolated patches. It in-crops

within the block.

In the southern part (Seam II of Bhatgaon-II) the thickness of the seam ranges from

0.02m to 2.61m. out of 106 bore holes intercepting the seam in the southern part seam

thickness of 0.90m and above have been recorded in 47 bore holes.

The total reserve of the block in the southern part (Bhatgaon-II) is 13.751 Mte

which includes proved reserve of 9.930 mte and indicated reserve of 3.821 Mte The grade

ranges from A to E. However, 96% of the reserve belongs to A to C grade. Coal reserve

in the northern part (Bhatgaon-II Extension) has not been estimated because of erratic

behavior of the seam as it is im-persistent and of less thickness.

Seam VII occurs above L5 with a parting range of 4.10m to 11.28m in the northern

part (Bhatgaon-II Extension) of the block. Its co-relatable seam is not seen in the southern

part of the block (Bhatgaon-II). It has been encountered in 18 bore holes only with a

thickness range of 0.02m to 0.63m. In view of this unworkable thickness and economic

insignificance no attempt has been made to assess the reserve of the seam.



2.17 Seam III Bottom (Co-relatable with seam L6 in Bhatgaon Ext.)

This coal seam is moderately developed in the northern part of the block (Bhatgaon-II

Extension) as L6 whereas IIIBottom is not developed



Shallowest 6.00m 6.40m 514.84m

Deepest 101.08m 101.80m 423.40m


Seam L-6 (III Bottom) occurs below seam VIII (seam III Top in the southern part) and

above seam VII where as its equivalent, III bottom occurs above seam II in the southern

part.


Minimum- 14.85m (BT-1) Maximum - 40.29m (BT-66)

Seam thickness – The thickness of the coal seam ranges from 0.06m to 2.20m.

In-crop The seam in-crops within the block in the northern and south - western parts.

Roof & floor The roof is represented by medium to coarse grained sandstone and the

floor is represented by shale and sandy shale.

Dirt bands The coal seam occurring in the northern part is devoid of any dirt bands.

However, only one band ranging in thickness from 0.03m to 0.10m is seen a few bore

holes in the southern part.

Table:-2.22, Proximate analysis - II


considered

Range Remarks

Minimum Maximum

Moisture % 41 6.80 9.20

Ash % 41 9.80 21.10

VM % 41 27.60 32.30

FC % 41 37.30 49.50

UHV (kcal/kg) 41 5024 6429

Grade 41 C A Mostly A

G.C.V (kcal/kg) 41 4990 6453

Long flame 13 B4 B5 B5



Table:-2.23, Ultimate Analysis -II

Parameters No. of BHs

considered

Range %

Minimum Maximum

Carbon 7 51.00 79.60

Hydrogen 7 2.90 5.10

Nitrogen 7 1.00 1.70

Sulphur 7 0.30 0.50

Oxygen 7 5.70 13.70

Total sulphur 1 0.60 ---

VM % (dmmf) 10 35.80 40.40

CV (Kcal/kg) (dmmf) 39 7555 7861

Hard Grove Index (HGI)

The HGI ranges from 45 to 48 as determined in two boreholes.

Ash Fusion Temp. No. of BHs Range (oC)




Table: - 2.24, Ash Analysis (Constituents %) - II

BH no. SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 TiO2 P2O5 SO3 CaO MgO Mn3O4 Alkby

dif

BT-18 63.43 27.91 4.82 1.75 0.05 0.48 1.04 0.65 --- 0.87

CBBT-

51

56.56 23.59 10.43 2.00 0.48 0.17 4.14 1.45 0.04 1.14


i. Coal seam L6 (co relatable with IIIB in Bhatgaon-II in the southern part of the

block) has been intersected in 133 bore holes within the entire block. Although it

is a persistent seam, it attains workable thickness in some area in the northern

part and in isolated bore holes / patches in the southern part of the block. The

coal seam is in-crops within the block.



ii. The thickness of the seam ranges from 0.06m to 2.20m and the predominant

thickness ranges from 0.50m to 1.20m.

The coal reserve of the seam has been calculated for the northern part (Bhatgaon-II

Extension) of the block only. The reserve calculation for the southern part (Bhatgaon-II)

has not been done due to poor development of the seam. The total coal reserve of the

seam (L6 in the northern part) is 7.089 Mte which includes 6.889 Mte of proved reserve

and 0.200 Mte of indicated reserve.

The grade of the coal ranges from A to C out of which about 76% of reserve is of B

grade.

Seam III Top (Co relatable with seam VIII )

It is the most important and persistent seam in the block and attains workable thickness

over major part of the area.



i) Shallowest - 6.80m 7.60m 525.56m

ii) Deepest - 96.90m 97.93m 427.27m


Seam IIITop (VIII) is the top most seam. Seam VIII occurs above the seam L6 and

below L7


Minimum - 1.76m Maximum - 9.06m

Seam thickness – The thickness range is from 0.29m to 3.50m. The most prevalent range

is from 1.50m to 2.50m.

In-crop - The seam in-crops within the block.

Roof & floor The roof is represented by medium to coarse grained sandstone and the

floor is represented by shale and sandstone.

Dirt bands Three dirt bands ranging in thickness 0.05m to 0.33m are seen in a few bore

holes within the block.

Table: - 2.24, Proximate analysis -II


considered

Range Remarks

Minimum Maximum

Moisture % 131 5.0 9.42

Ash % 131 9.88 43.6




considered

Range Remarks

Minimum Maximum

VM % 71 17.2 40.3

FC % 71 33.7 54.5

UHV (kcal/kg) 131 2124 6268

Grade 131 G A mostly grade E - B

G.C.V (kcal/kg) 66 3580 5864

Long flame 29 B5 B4 Predominant B4

Table: - 2.25, Ultimate Analysis - II

Parameters No. of BHs

considered

Range %

Minimum Maximum

Carbon 20 41.6 81.3

Hydrogen 20 2.2 5.0

Nitrogen 20 0.8 1.7

Sulphur 20 0.2 0.7

Oxygen 13 5.3 10.3

Total sulphur 1 --- 0.5

VM % (dmmf) 24 27.6 39.1

CV (Kcal/kg) (dmmf) 61 7362 7751

Table: - 2.26, Hard Grove Index (HGI) - II

Area No. of BHS

considered

Seam

thickness

Sample Range

Minimum Maximum

Northern part

of the block

11 1.25m to

2.70m

Bcs / I30 39 55

Ash Fusion Temp. Range (oC) No. of BH Range






Table: - 2.27, Ash Analysis (Constituents %) -III

BH no. SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 TiO2 P2O5 SO3 CaO MgO Mn3O4 Alk.

diff

BT-18 61.20 28.04 4.90 1.81 0.04 0.05 1.32 1.17 --- 1.02

CBBT-

25

62.56 27.82 1.71 2.00 0.32 0.14 2.46 2.01 0.01 0.97

CBBT-

68

59.44 24.83 6.00 1.50 0.42 0.41 4.70 1.45 0.03 1.22

CBBT-

75

61.14 24.71 6.43 2.00 0.31 0.17 2.46 0.88 0.03 1.87

CBBT-

105

63.22 21.96 6.28 1.50 0.26 0.20 2.80 2.01 0.03 1.87


i. Coal seam VIII (co relatable with III Top in the Bhatgaon-II in southern part of the

block) is quite persistent and developed within the block. It is in-crop in the southern

and central parts of the block. It has been intersected in 143 nos of bore holes within the

block.

ii. The thickness of the seam ranges from 0.29m to 3.50m. In 129 boreholes the thickness

of the coal seam is found to be more than 0.90m.

III. The total coal reserve of the seam is 40.714 Mte which includes 40.116 Mte of

proved reserve and 0.598 Mte of indicated reserve. The grade of coal ranges from G to A.

However 91% of coal reserve comes within C, D & E grade.



2.20 Other local seams in Bhatgaon Ext.

Besides the aforesaid coal seams, there are 5 younger coal seams/ sections (L7

bottom , L7 top, L8, IX bottom & IX top) which have developed in the northern part

(Bhatgaon-II Extension) of the allotted coal block. Because of their im-persistency, low

thickness etc the reserve estimate has not been done. Brief description of these coal

seams is as follows:

Table: - 2.28, Local seams in Bhatgaon Ext

Name of

the seam

No of holes

intersecte

d

Thickness

range m

Dirt band

thickness m

(nos)

No. of holes

where seam

+0.9 m thick

Av grade

of coal

IX Top 5 0.38 -- 0.85 (2) Nil F/G

IX Bottom 08 0.4 – 5.08 0.2 – 0.5(4) 3 E

L8 24 0.15 – 1.7 ---------- 5 D

L7 Top 34 0.05 – 1.3 0.06–

0.10(1)

5 D

L7 Bottom 46 0.05 – 2.0 0.15 m(1) 12 C

2.21 COAL RESERVE

Coal reserves are estimated for L1, II and III Top of southern part and VI, L6 and

VIII in the northern part by MECL and CMPD Iand according to GR prepared by these

organizations reserves are as follows:

Seam wise and grade wise coal reserve in Shankarpur (Bhatgaon-II) & extension

coal block.

Table: - 2.29, Coal Reserve in Shankarpur (Fig. Mte)

A. Bhatgaon-II (Southern part) B. Bhatgaon-II Ext.(Northern part) Grand total (A + B)

Gr.

Coal seams Total

(A)

Coal seams Total

(B) III T II L1 VIII L6 VI

A --- 2.31

(0.86)

0.31 2.62

(0.86)

--- 0.70 8.10

(0.51)

8.80

(0.51)

11.42

(1.37)

B 2.12 4.97

(2.77)

3.08 10.17

(2.77)

--- 5.19

(0.20)

1.75

(0.63)

6.94

(0.83)

17.11

(3.60)

C 4.53 2.10

(0.19)

1.99 8.62

(0.19)

1.80

(0.13)

1.01 0.18 2.99

(0.13)

11.61

(0.32)



A. Bhatgaon-II (Southern part) B. Bhatgaon-II Ext.(Northern part) Grand total (A + B)

Gr.

Coal seams Total

(A)

Coal seams Total

(B) III T II L1 VIII L6 VI

D 9.89 0.40 1.58 11.87 11.02

(0.46)

--- 0.03 11.05

(0.46)

22.92

(0.46)

E 5.09 0.15 0.42 5.66 4.10

(0.01)

--- --- 4.10

(0.01)

9.76

(0.01)

F 0.69 --- --- 0.69 0.83 --- --- 0.83 1.52

G --- --- --- --- 0.04 --- --- 0.04 0.04

22.32

---

9.93

(3.82)

7.38

---

39.63

(3.82)

17.79

(0.60)

6.90

(0.20)

10.06

(1.13)

34.75

(1.93)

74.38

(5.75)

Total 22.32 13.75 7.38 43.45 18.39 7.10 11.19 36.68 80.13

Figures in the parenthesis are indicated reserves, rest are proved reserves.

In the northern part of the block (Bhatgaon Extension) for reserve estimation,

minimum thickness of the coal seam has been taken as 0.50m. The total reserve within

the seam thickness of 0.50m to 0.90m is 6.502 Mte in the GR. In the southern part

(Bhatgaon-II) the reserve estimation in the GR has been done based on the seam

thickness of 0.90m and above

Note:

1. The coal seams III Top/VIII, II and L6 are in-cropping.

2. Seams are thin and their extents are inconsistent.

3. The 8.11% and 20.81% reserves are in 0.5 to 0.9m and 0.9 to 1.2m thickness area

respectively.

4. There are total fourteen faults F1 to F14 with throw ranging from 5m to 45m

5. From the above it may be concluded that the property is neither good for opencast, nor

for underground.

However, with conservation aspect in mind, the best option, as proposed in the mining

plan, is to work with four quarries and one underground mine.



2.22 Geo-mining Parameters

The geological parameters of coal seams considered for reserve and mining in geological

report are as follows:-

Total block area = 33.63 sq.km

Total geological reserve = 80.13Mte

Coal reserves per sq. km = 2.4Mte(approx)

Total extractable reserve = 55.15 Mte

Vol. of OB to be removed = 924.43 Mcum

Average stripping ratio = 16.76 cum/Te of coal

Target capacity = 2 MTPA

Life of mine = 32 years

2.23 Workable seams its thickness, depth etc. are as follows:

Table :- 2.30,Workable seams, Thickness and Depth

Bhatgaon-II Bhatgaon Extn.

Seam/

Parting Thickness

Range in m

Depth

Range in

metres

Seam/

Parting

Thickness

Range in

metres

Depth

Range in

metres

III Top 0.45---2.93 8 --- 62 VIII 0.29---3.5 7---97

Parting 17.15—49.49 Parting 1.79---9.06

II 0.02----2.61 14---95 L6 0.06---2.20 6---102

Parting 10.51---33.08 Parting 40.53---67

L1 0.3----1.84 46---115 VI 0.03---2.0 44---134



CHAPTER – 3

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS

OF

THE PROJECT AFFECTED PEOPLE



CHAPTER III

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE PROJECT AFFECTED PEOPLE

The district Surguja has ample resources including; Land, Water, Forest, Animals to

support the socio-economic fabric of the area. The socio-economic status of the particular

villages, where project is proposed is stated on the basis of primary and secondary data

collected. These data will also act as a base line data to assess and monitor the economic

progress and livelihood level of the project affected people.

Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses in their existing socio-economic set

up would form the basis of formulating an appropriate rehabilitation plan.

(Corresponding to Section 1.6 Annex -2 of CG Model R&R Policy -2005)

3.1 SURVEY METHODOLOGY

A 100% socio-economic survey was conducted in all 9 project-impacted villages

viz., Shankarpur, Mohanpur, Songara, Bojha, Dharampur, Shakalpur, Koteya, Mayapur

and Tulsi. The land use survey was also conducted in these villages. To collect the

primary data a form is designed as per the project specific need. The form consists of

Table, Text and Questionnaire.

After collecting the data in each village, group discussion with project affected

people was organized to find out the data related to community and to sample cross

check, the data collected during the household survey. Apart from this these group

discussions were taken as a tool for identifying their present situation in order to assess

their needs and priorities. The survey was conducted in between August 09 and November

09.

3.2 SOCIAL STATUS OF THE PROJECT AFFECTED AREA

3.2.1 DEMOGRAPHY

The population density in the study area is 2.44 persons per Ha. The male

population constitutes 53 %. There are average 907 females per 1000 males. SC

percentage is 10 while ST constitutes bulk of population 51%. OBC are only 22%. The

average literacy is 36.13%, which is quite low. The literacy among women is still poorer at

29.74%. The demographic profile of the affected villages is given in Table 3.1



3.2.2 HOUSE HOLDS IN PROJECT AREA

The village Songara has highest number of House Holds in the project area while

Shankarpur has lowest. The comparative details of other villages are as under.

Chart: - 3.1, Number of House Holds in Project Area

Source: Socio-Economic Survey by LNC, August 09 to November 09

The village wise population details are tabulated as under;

Table: - 3.1, Demographic Profile of Project Affected Villages

Village Female Male Total Sex Ratio

1 2 3 4 5

Mayapur 515 596 1111 864

Bojha 879 1071 1950 821

Songara 1217 1354 2571 899

Mohanpur 425 429 854 991

Shankarpur 220 213 433 1033

Kotaya 883 954 1837 926

Sakalpur 798 827 1625 965

Tulsi 907 1037 1944 875

Dharampur 421 531 952 793

Total 6265 7012 13277 893


Mayapur Bojha Songara Mohanpur Shankarpur Kotaya Sakalpur Tulsi Dharampur

Series1 287 442 509 170 105 467 387 380 242

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Axi

s Ti

tle

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS IN PROJECT AREA



The status of social fabric in terms of population in number is given in the following

table;

Table: - 3.2, Affected Population

Village General OBC SC ST Total

Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. %

Maya 162 15% 0 0% 50 5% 899 81% 1111 100%

Bhoja 480 25% 437 22% 426 22% 607 31% 1950 100%

Songara 534 21% 86 3% 421 16% 1530 60% 2571 100%

Mohanpur 28 3% 201 24% 9 1% 616 72% 854 100%

Shankarpur 19 4% 10 2% 0 0% 404 93% 433 100%

Kotaya 640 35% 353 19% 230 13% 614 33% 1837 100%

Sakalpur 345 21% 892 55% 50 3% 338 21% 1625 100%

Tulsi 34 2% 613 32% 150 8% 1147 59% 1944 100%

Dharampur 56 6% 258 27% 10 1% 628 66% 952 100%


The villages coming within the project area have major inhabitants belonging to ST

category i.e. 51% of the whole population. The population of OBC is next to ST i.e. 22%.

SC are only 10% in the project area. General category people are mere i.e. 17%. Extent of

population of different category can be adjudged through the following pie chart.

Chart: - 3.2, Affected Villages Population


GENERAL17%

OBC22%

SC10%

ST51%

POPULATION IN PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES



Comparative details of project affected population

Chart: - 3.3, Details of Social group Matrix of Affected Population


The status of people residing in village grouped in to families in the project affected

area is tabulated and comparative status is shown in the following bart chart.

Chart: - 3.4, Social group Affected Families


899

607

1530

616

404

614

338

1147

628

50

426 421

9 0

230

50150

100

437

86201

10

353

892

613

258162

480534

28 19

640

345

34 56

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

DETAILS OF SOCIAL GROUP MATRIX OF AFFECTED POPULATION

Scheduled tribe Scheduled cast OBC General

BojhaDharamp

urKoteya Mayapur

Mohanpur

sakalpurshankarp

urSongara Tulsi

OBC 92 57 86 34 207 2 17 117

Other 118 27 160 48 4 82 4 99 8

SC 94 1 56 12 3 11 86 32

ST 138 157 165 227 129 87 99 307 223

Grand Total 442 242 467 287 170 387 105 509 380

0

100

200

300

400

500

600 SOCIAL GROUP OF AFFECTED FAMILIES



The village wise destitute and dependents in the project impacted area is shown in

the following bar chart along with the detail table

Chart: - 3.5, Destitute and Dependents


Out of total destitute and dependents 56% are disables/infirm and rest 44% are

unsupported destitute. The graphical representation is given in the following pie chart.

Chart: - 3.6, Destitute and Dependents in %


The average sex ratio in the project area in terms of % is 53% male and rest 47% is

female. The extent is depicted through following chart.

Mayapur Bojha SongaraMohanp

urShankarp

urKotaya Sakalpur Tulsi

Dharampur

Total

Unsupported destitutes 0 0 15 4 0 0 3 10 5 37

Disabled / infirm 1 2 10 4 1 8 4 8 10 48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NU

MB

ER

DESTITUTES AND DEPENDENTS

Unsupported destitutes

44%

Disabled / infirm56%

DESTITUTE AND DEPENDANTS IN %



Chart: - 3.7, Project Affected People, Average Sex Ratio in %


3.2.3 Literacy and Education Status

Literacy levels in the project-impacted villages are quite low as compared to the

state (65.18%) and national average (65.38%). Educational status is poor in the villages.

The Socio-Economic Survey of the villagers revealed that 18% of the people were

educated only up till the primary levels, 11% up till the middle leveli and 4% have

completed only High School level i.e. 10th level of schooling. 2% have reached up to 12th

level of education known as higher secondary. Only 1% people in the Project Area are

graduate. The people do not have access to any technical or professional training that can

help them to get other jobs. There is awareness about print media such as newspapers.

There are 20 subscribers of News Paper in Sonagara village and no subscriber in any

other village within project affected area.

The following bar chart reveals that illiteracy level is less in the age group below

than 18 years. This is gradually increasing in the higher age group. It gives an impression

47%

53%

PROJECT AFFECTED PEOPLE : AVERGE SEX RATIO IN %

Total



that people are becoming more aware on the education and literacy rate is going to

improve gradually in future.

Chart: - 3.8, Illiteracy Level in Age Group Wise


The following graph results that maximum extent of population is educated up to

primary level only. Gradually extent of education level is decreasing from Middle to

Graduate level. They need awareness on the benefit of higher education.

M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total

< 18 yrs 18 to 25 yrs > 25 to 35 yrs > 35 to 50 yrs > 50 yrs

27 16 43 31 5 36 16 2 18 4 0 475 66 141

13150 181 64

19 83 52 9 61 14 3 1713 7 20

100

53153

50

1666 28

8 36 3 1 4

290 261 551

276

209

485204

75

27999

27126 29

7 36

677 606 1283

189

213

402

233

121

354202

72

274 127

17

144

360 343 703

410

7071117

650

898

1548977

9351912 550

4841034

1131 1035 2166

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AGE GROUP WISE LITERACY IN NUMBER

Graduation High School Higher Sc Middle Primary Illiterate Unknown



Chart: - 3.9, Illiteracy Level in numbers


Literacy in whole population of project affected area in terms of % and extent is

depicted in the following pie chart.

Chart: - 3.9, Illiteracy Level in %


M F Total

Total

78 23 101336 147 483194 85 279898

579 1477

14281029

2457

29473367 6314

1131 1035 2166

LITERACY IN NUMBER

Graduation High School Higher Sc Middle Primary Illiterate Unknown

Graduation1%

High School

4%Higher Sc

2% Middle 11%

Primary18%

Illiterate48%

Unknown16%

LITERACY IN %



The above piechart explains the population of literacy in terms of % where the

population of illiterates is 48% and the graduates are 1%. The chart further reveals that

the 18% people residing in project affected area are educated up to primary level, like wise

11% up to Middle level, 4% up to High School level, 2% up to Higher secondary level and

only 1 % are up to Gradauation level. The education level of 16% population is unknown

because, they are under age or non respondent.



Village wise and age class wise education level in number is tabulated in the following table.

Table: - 3.3, Educational Profile

Education Level/

Villages < 18 yrs 18 to 25 yrs > 25 to 35 yrs > 35 to 50 yrs > 50 yrs Total

M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T

Mayapur

Graduation 1 1 1 0 1

Illiterate 24 38 62 47 91 138 84 105 189 107 57 164 33 19 52 295 310 605

Primary 88 69 157 31 22 53 7 7 14 6 2 8 1 1 133 100 233

Middle 15 18 33 22 17 39 11 3 14 3 3 51 38 89

High 3 3 6 7 1 8 2 2 5 5 1 1 18 4 22

Higher Sc 6 6 3 1 4 3 1 4 1 1 13 2 15

Unknown 85 60 145 85 60 145

Sub-Total 215 188 403 113 131 244 108 116 224 124 60 184 36 19 55 596 514 1110

Bojha

Graduation 6 4 10 10 1 11 4 1 5 20 6 26

Illiterate 24 21 45 33 64 97 53 103 156 102 137 239 67 75 142 279 400 679

Primary 123 106 229 32 54 86 61 41 102 49 24 73 40 7 47 305 232 537

Middle 64 63 127 67 37 104 42 25 67 32 6 38 10 1 11 215 132 347

High 19 9 28 32 4 36 18 7 25 23 5 28 6 2 8 98 27 125

Higher Sc 3 1 4 18 8 26 14 3 17 10 10 1 1 46 12 58

Unknown 108 70 178 108 70 178



Education Level/



Sub-Total 341 270 611 188 171 359 198 180 378 220 173 393 12

4 85 209 1071 879 1950

Songara

Graduation 1 1 7 11 18 6 3 9 7 7 3 3 24 14 38

Illiterate 51 55 106 90 138 228 143 190 333 201 170 371 12

4 95 219 609 648 1257

Primary 91 79 170 21 28 49 36 25 61 27 16 43 22 3 25 197 151 348

Middle 52 29 81 43 25 68 28 7 35 15 7 22 5 4 9 143 72 215

High 6 8 14 23 18 41 12 4 16 10 10 3 3 54 30 84

Higher Sc 2 1 3 21 16 37 10 3 13 3 4 7 1 1 37 24 61

Unknown 290 278 568 290 278 568

Sub-Total 493 450 943 205 236 441 235 232 467 263 197 460 15

8

10

2 260 1354 1217 2571

Mohanpur

Graduation 1 1 1 0 1

Illiterate 18 20 38 20 36 56 29 50 79 64 74 138 22 26 48 153 206 359

Primary 45 38 83 18 22 40 10 1 11 12 6 18 5 5 90 67 157

Middle 29 30 59 9 9 18 11 3 14 4 1 5 3 3 56 43 99

High 12 16 28 10 3 13 7 7 4 4 33 19 52

Higher Sc 11 4 15 1 1 4 4 15 5 20



Education Level/



Unknown 81 85 166 81 85 166

Sub-Total 185 189 374 69 74 143 57 55 112 88 81 169 30 26 56 429 425 854

Shankarpu

r

Illiterate 5 10 15 7 14 21 15 27 42 28 33 61 20 24 44 75 108 183

Primary 21 27 48 13 7 20 8 8 12 2 14 8 1 9 62 37 99

Middle 12 16 28 10 9 19 6 2 8 2 2 1 1 31 27 58

High 1 2 3 3 2 5 1 1 1 1 6 4 10

Higher Sc 1 1 1 0 1

Unknown 38 44 82 38 44 82

Sub-Total 77 99 176 33 32 65 31 29 60 43 35 78 29 25 54 213 220 433

Kotaya

Graduation 3 3 4 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 9 2 11

Illiterate 43 45 88 43 67 110 69 115 184 126 139 265 73 85 158 354 451 805

Primary 133 128 261 26 26 52 31 15 46 29 8 37 17 4 21 236 181 417

Middle 45 41 86 26 33 59 42 15 57 17 6 23 3 3 133 95 228

High 16 12 28 22 12 34 13 13 4 2 6 4 1 5 59 27 86

Higher Sc 1 4 5 22 4 26 8 1 9 2 2 1 1 33 10 43

Unknown 130 117 247 130 117 247

Sub-Total 368 347 715 142 142 284 167 147 314 179 156 335 98 91 189 954 883 1837



Education Level/



Sakalpur

Graduation 2 2 3 3 5 0 5

Illiterate 31 40 71 56 101 157 65 93 158 102 87 189 62 58 120 316 379 695

Primary 91 89 180 17 20 37 24 14 38 25 3 28 10 2 12 167 128 295

Middle 40 39 79 41 36 77 35 9 44 10 2 12 1 1 2 127 87 214

High 12 7 19 19 3 22 9 3 12 3 3 43 13 56

Higher Sc 1 1 2 3 7 10 4 4 8 8 16

Unknown 161 183 344 161 183 344

Sub-Total 336 359 695 138 167 305 140 119 259 140 92 232 73 61 134 827 798 1625

Tulsi

Graduation 2 1 3 5 5 5 5 3 3 15 1 16

Illiterate 78 56 134 66 124 190 105 126 231 139 161 300 79 66 145 467 533 1000

Primary 63 60 123 27 27 54 43 15 58 33 9 42 23 23 189 111 300

Middle 27 22 49 43 33 76 18 6 24 11 4 15 5 1 6 104 66 170

High 4 4 8 11 4 15 1 5 6 2 2 4 18 15 33

Higher Sc 6 6 17 14 31 9 6 15 5 2 7 37 22 59

Unknown 207 159 366 207 159 366

Sub-Total 387 302 689 169 202 371 181 158 339 193 178 371 10

7 67 174 1037 907 1944

Dharampu



Education Level/



r

Graduation 2 2 1 1 3 0 3

Illiterate 86 58 144 48 72 120 87 89 176 108 77 185 70 36 106 399 332 731

Primary 22 10 32 4 7 11 13 3 16 9 2 11 1 1 49 22 71

Middle 6 3 9 15 10 25 11 5 16 5 1 6 1 1 38 19 57

High 2 5 7 4 3 7 1 1 7 8 15

Higher Sc 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 2 6

Unknown 31 39 70 31 39 70

Sub-Total 147 115 262 73 92 165 115 98 213 124 81 205 72 36 108 531 422 953

Total 2549 231

9

486

8

113

0

124

7

237

7

123

2

113

4

236

6

137

4

105

3

242

7

72

7

51

2

123

9 7012 6265 13277


M – Male; F – Female; T – Total.

1. Primary level refers schooling up to class V. 2. idle level refers to schooling up to class VIII. 3. Metric level refers to schooling up to

class X. 4. Unknown figure is 2166 against a total of 13,277 corresponds to children who‘s age up to 10 yrs.



3.2.4 Occupational Profile

Type of Occupations

Occupations other than cultivation are also being practiced in the villages. The

number of persons involved in various occupations is listed in table 3.4

Table :- 3.4, Number of Persons Involved In Different Occupations

Occupation Mayapur Bojha Songara Mohanpur Shankarpur Kotaya Sakalpur Tulsi Dharampur Total

Agriculture 289 321 423 164 72 374 275 307 151 2376

Business 1 31 12 1 1 8 33 1 2 90

Service 3 18 24 3 0 7 9 16 2 82

Others 2 91 58 4 35 82 73 68 88 501

Grand Total 295 461 517 172 108 471 390 392 243 3049


The analysis of occupation pattern through the follwing graph reveales that main

occupation is agriculture. Very few people are self employed in business taking advantage

of strategic location of their village on the main road or linkage with remote area. The

people of village Bojha, Songara and Sakalpur are doing buisiness ahead to other villages

and a quite satisfacoty number of prople are in Service from Bojha, Songara and Tulsi.

The following graph explains about occupation practises in Mayapur ,Bojha,

Songara, Mohanpur, Shankarpur, Kotaya, Sakalpur, Tulsi and Dharampur villages .The

maximum number of people in the the villages are involved in agriculture.The villagers are

also involved in otherfields like bussiness, service and other activity for their livelihood.

The villages that are actively participating in agriculture are Songhara , Kotaya, Bojha and

Tulsi. The second occcupation is bussiness in which Sakalpur, Bojha ,Songara are more

active. The service is in the third order and the people of Songara, Tulsi ,Bojha are far

ahead than rest of the project affected villages. There are not any family earning from

service in Shankarpur village.



The Shankarpur village has least people involoved in agriculutre sector. There is less

buisiness oportunity in mayapur, mohanpur, shankalpur and tulsi being situated in the

remote area.

Chart: - 3.10, Persons Occupations


Chart: - 3.10.1, OCCUPATION PATTERN


PERSONS OCCUPATIONS

289321

423

164

72

374

275307

151

131 12 1 1 8

331 23 18 24

3 0 7 9 16 21

050

100

150200250300

350400450

May

apur

Bojha

Son

gara

Moh

anpu

r

Sha

nkar

pur

Kot

aya

Sak

alpu

r

Tulsi

Dha

ram

pur

VILLAGES

NU

MB

ER

S

Agriculture Business Service Others

Mayapur

Bojha SongaraMohan

purShankar

purKotaya

Sakalpur

TulsiDharam

purAVERA

GE

Agriculture 97.97 69.63 81.82 95.35 66.67 79.41 70.51 78.32 62.14 77.98

Business 0.34 6.72 2.32 0.58 0.93 1.70 8.46 0.26 0.82 2.46

Service 1.02 3.90 4.64 1.74 0.00 1.49 2.31 4.08 0.82 2.22

Others 0.68 19.74 11.22 2.33 32.41 17.41 18.72 17.35 36.21 17.34

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

OC

UP

ATI

ON

%

OCCUPATION IN %(WITHIN ALL SECTOR OF OCCUPATION)



The above graph displays the occupation pattern in the village. The chart 3.10

narates about the number of persons in a particular occupation within project affected

villages, while the chart 3.10.1 displys about the percentage of people involoved in the

particular type of occupation within village. Comparision of both generates interesting

results like: in agriculture sector number of people involved is highest in Songara village

but the % of people is highest at Mayapur village.

The Chart no. 3.10.1 creates the base line for occupational pattern in the project

affected area.

Chart: - 3.11, Persons Occupations in %


The above pie chart explains about the people involvement in occupation practices

in the villages in terms of % among all the project affected villages. The village Songara

has highest share (16%) and ahead to kotaya(15%) and Bojha. The village Dharampur

shows the persons occupation 8% which is comparatively less than Mayapur that is 10%.

Tulsi and Sakalpur have equal share i.e. 13%. The people of Shankarpur and Mohanpur

villages are at the last in series having people occupation 4% and 6% respectively.

The share of villages in occupation is almost in tune to the size of population except

the villages situated in remote area, lacking educational and linkage facility in comparison

to other project affected villages.

PERSONS OCCUPATIONS IN % Mayapur

10%Dharampur

8%Tulsi

13%

Sakalpur

13%

Kotaya

15%Shankarpur

4%

Mohanpur

6%

Bojha

15%

Songara

16%



3.2.5 Cultivation Practices

Agriculture being the dominant activity in the villages, a brief profile of the cultivation

practices has been presented below. Cultivation is done in both the seasons i.e. Rabi and

Kharif subject to availability of rainwater or irrigation facilities. Table 3.5 shows the major

crops that are grown in the villages. Rice is the most favoured crop in either season.

Focused group discussion with the people revealed that the pattern and quantity of rains

control the productivity and yield of the crops.

Table: - 3.5, Cultivation Practices in Project Impacted Villages

Desc

rip

tio

n

Mayapur

Bojh

a

Son

gara

Moha

np

ur

Sha

nkarp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Average Wage Rate in Rs./Day

90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00

Kharif Crops in Quintal /anum

1866 2652 3054 1020 630 2400 2280 1460 3040 18402

Rabi Crops in Quintal / anum

229 353 407 136 84 309 304 193 373 2388

Average Fertilizer use in quintal / anum

450 180 450 140 140 860 325 300 100 2945

Average Pesticide use Liters / anum

15 5 14 5 5 21 8 8 3 84

Source of irrigation

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Rain water

Source: Group Discussions with villagers,by LNC, Oct 2009

Note : - General practice in villages is payment of Rs 60-70 in cash & Rest is paid in terms

of Food.



3.2.6 Supplementary income sources

Other small activities are practiced in the villages that are either seasonal or all

around the year as supplementary income sources. Such activities include:

1) Collection of Tendu Patta.

2) Collection of leaves for pattal making

3) Livestock rearing for sale of eggs, chicken, meat and milk.

4) Sale of Mahua flowers (Rs. 4-5/kg) (sold in haat)

5) Sale of sal seed (Rs 3-4/kg) (hot weather only) 10-12 kg/ season (sold in

haat)

3.2.7 Livestock rearing

Table 3.6 gives the village wise details of livestock rearing information collected

through group discussion from villagers.

Table: - 3.6, Livestock Rearing In Project Impacted Villages

De

sc

rip

tio

n

Ma

yap

ur

Bo

jha

So

ng

ara

Mo

ha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Ko

taya

Sa

kalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dh

ara

mp

ur

To

tal

A. Livestock

Cows in Number 100 400 800 50 100 150 100 500 500 2700

Buffaloes in Number 20 50 125 5 100 60 50 100 60 570

Poultry in Number

100 300 100 100 200 40 150 4000 5000 9990

Sheep and Goats in Number

200 200 700 150 150 100 200 1200 800 3700

Pigs in Number

0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50

B. Milk (Avg)

Production (lit/day

/animal) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

Sale price, Rs./ Kg 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

Fish



De

sc

rip

tio

n

Ma

yap

ur

Bo

jha

So

ng

ara

Mo

ha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Ko

taya

Sa

kalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dh

ara

mp

ur

To

tal

ProductionKg/annum

100. 1000 1100

Sale price Rs. /Kg 60 60 60

Meat

Production(Kg)

4… 4…. 8… 3…. 3.5…. 2…. 4… 30…. 20… 78.5

Sale price /Kg

Rs.200 Rs.200 Rs.200 Rs.200 Rs.180 Rs.200 Rs.200 Rs.190 Rs.160 Rs.190

Source: Group Discussions with villagers,by LNC Oct 2009

The data is based on group discussion only. Actual counting of live stock has not

been done. Eggs neither sold in villages nor demanded by the villagers on price. The

products of livestock‘s are not marketed on regular basis. It is occasionally purchased /

sold at the time of festival etc.

3.2.8 Income

Despite having main and subsidiary occupations, the average income earned by the

villagers is very low. It can be seen from table 3.7. Most of the families earn approximately

Rs. 2000-3000 / month. The expenditure is close to the same amount leaving no scope for

saving. Seasonal nature of all occupation is the primary reason for such low incomes.

Table: - 3.7, Income Levels in Project Affected Villages

Number of households

Village Annual income

Mayapur Bojha Songara Mohanpur Shankarpur

Kotaya Sakalpur Tulsi Dharampur

Total

less than Rs. 10,000 61 64 28 41 1 101 71 1 12 380




Village Annual income



Total

Rs. 10,000 & above but less than 50,000

224 357 461 126 103 353 309 376 219 2528

Rs. 50,000 & above but less than 100,000

2 21 15 3 1 5 7 2 8 64

Above Rs. 100,000 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 1 3 17

Total 287 442 509 170 105 467 387 380 242 2989


Chart: - 3.11, Income Levels


61 6428 41

1

10171

1 12

224

357

461

126103

353

309

376

219

221 15 3 1 5 7 2 8

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

NU

MB

ER

of

ho

uselh

old

VILLAGES

INCOME LEVEL

<10000 10001-50000 50001-100000 >100000



The above graph reveals the income levels of the number of household in the

project affected area. The average income earned by the villagers is very low due to

seasonal occupation.The maximum number of families earning more than 10000 and up to

50000 are from the village Songara. The number of people in the villages whose income

is less than Rs. 10000, First Block are 380 among which the maximum number of people

are from Kotaya and Sakalpur and the lowest number of household are from

Tulsi,Shankarpur and Dharampur.In the Second Block of income,the number of household

are 2528 among which the high number of households are from Songara, Tulsi, and

Kotaya and the lowest number of household are from Shankarpur and Dharampur.The

Third Block of income has 64 faimilies, among which the maximum number of household

are from Bojha and songara and the lowest number of people are from

Shankarpur,Mayapur and Tulsi.The last Fourth Block of income is above Rs.100000 in

which the highest number of people are from Kotaya and the lowest possible are from

Tulsi.

Chart: - 3.11, Income Levels: % of House Holds


13%

85%

2% 0%

INCOME LEVEL : % OF HOUSE HOLDS

<10000 10001-50000 50001-100000 >100000



The pie-chart shown above explains the income level of household in project

affected area in terms of %.The pie-chart further reveals that the income earn by the

villager‘s under Rs.10001 -50000 is 85% which is uppermost as compared to the second

block of income of household which is less than Rs. 10000(13%).Only 2% families comes

under the third block i.e. Rs. 50001-100000.

3.2.9 Assets

Asset ownership is poor in the villages (Table 3.1.8). About 15% of the population in

Shankarpur owns a radio and an equal number owns television. Almost 43% of Songara

owns radio and 25 houses have television. 5 households in Shankarpur have telephone

facility. Cycle is the major mode of transportation. Bullock cart is another major mode of

transportation. Some people in Shankarpur and Songara own two wheelers. There are 11

cars/Jeep and 8 tractors in Shankarpur. Buses are also available for public transportation.

These assets gives picture of income of a family.

Table: - 3.8, Asset Ownership


Assets

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Radios in Number 28 40 50 17 10 38 35 24 40 282

Televisions in

Number 05 08 25 03 02 19 07 07 09 085

Telephones in

Number 08 16 25 05 05 15 12 14 16 116




Assets

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Cycles in Number 155 235 265 85 53 212 235 174 260 1674

Two wheelers in

Number 05 05 30 03 03 12 04 05 13 080

Cars/Jeeps in

Number 00 03 11 00 00 00 02 02 01 019

Tractors in Number 00 01 08 01 01 02 00 02 01 016

Source: Group Discussions with villagers, by LNC October 2009

Chart: - 3.11, Asset Ownership


ASSET OWNERSHIP

2840

50

17 10

38 3524

40

5 825

3 219

7 7 98 16 255 5 15 12 14 16

155

235

265

85

53

212235

174

260

5 5

30

3 3 12 4 5 130 3 11

0 0 0 2 2 10 1 8 1 1 2 0 2 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

May

apur

Bojha

Songa

ra

Moh

anpu

r

Shank

arpu

r

Kotay

a

Sakalpu

r

Tulsi

Dha

ram

pur

VILLAGES

NU

MB

ER

S

Radios Televisions Telephones Cycles Two wheelers Cars/Jeeps Tractors



The above Graph explains about the asset ownership in the project affected villages

i.e. Mayapur, Bojha, Songara, Mohanpur, Shankarpur, Kotaya, Sakalpur, Tulsi and

Dharampur.The maximum number of households having cycle are Songara

,Dharampur,Tulsi and Bojha. The radio and television has its presence in all villages. Still

radio is very much popular as tool of entertainment compared to television. The mode of

communication is telephone, Songara has the highest number and the least are found in

the Shankarpur and Mohanpur. Songara village have the highest number of car/jeep and

tractors as compared to other villages.

The above assests have been taken as indicator of income level in the

assessment of individual family income.

3.2.10 Profile of Vulnerable Population

Table 3.1.9A gives the number of destitute and dependents in the villages. Majority

of population is schedule tribes. Shankarpur has highest unsupported destitute/widows

Table: - 3.9, Number of Destitute and Dependants in Project Affected People

Mayapur

Bojha Songara

Mohanpur

Shankarpur


Total

Unsupported

destitutes 0 0 15 4 0 0 3 10 5 37

Disabled / infirm 1 2 10 4 1 8 4 8 10 48

Source: Group Discussions with villagers,by LNC, October 2009

Chart: - 3.11, Destitute and Dependants in Project Affected People


0 0

15

40 0

3

105

37

1 2

10

41

84

8 10

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

DESTITUTE AND DISABLED IN PROJECT AFFECTED PEOPLE

Unsupported destitutes Disabled / infirm



The above Graph reveals about the destitute and dependent in the project

affected area. Unsuppoted destitute in project affected area are maximum in the villages

Songara and Tulsi.The disabled/infirm people are highest in are dharampur and songara.

The least number of destitues and disabled are in the village of mayapur,shankarpur and

bojha.

Chart: - 3.12, Destitute and Dependants in %


The above piechart explains about the destitute and dependents in terms of % in

the project affected area. Disabled people are more than the unsupported destitute.

Schedule Tribe population is dominant in all villages except 3 villages i.e. Kotaya

and Shakalpur. General population in Kotaya and OBC in Shakalpur are in greater number

than ST. Bhoja, Songara and Kotaya have more than 10% population of Schedule Cast.

Details of other population is given in the following table, 3.10 .

DESTITUTE AND DEPENDANTS IN %

Disabled /

infirm

56%

Unsupported

destitutes

44%



Table: - 3.10, SC/ST in Project Affected Villages

Village General OBC SC

Population

ST

Population

Total

Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. %

Maya 162 15% 0 0% 50 5% 899 81% 1111 100%

Bhoja 480 25% 437 22% 426 22% 607 31% 1950 100%

Songara 534 21% 86 3% 421 16% 1530 60% 2571 100%

Mohanpur 28 3% 201 24% 9 1% 616 72% 854 100%

Shankarpur 19 4% 10 2% 0 0% 404 93% 433 100%

Kotaya 640 35% 353 19% 230 13% 614 33% 1837 100%

Sakalpur 345 21% 892 55% 50 3% 338 21% 1625 100%

Tulsi 34 2% 613 32% 150 8% 1147 59% 1944 100%

Dharampur 56 6% 258 27% 10 1% 628 66% 952 100%


The predominant tribe in this region is Gond. The following bar chart reveals that

Songara and Tulsi is inhabited by the considerable population belonging to ST. Bhoja and

Songara have largest number of Schedule Cast population among all the villages.

Comparative status of SC and ST can be adjudged through the following graph.



Chart: - 3.12, SC/ST in Project Affected Villages


The extent of different types of population within the project affected villages is

depicted in the following pie chart. The major population belongs to ST category i.e. 51%

of the whole population. The population of OBC is next to ST i.e. 22%. SC is only 10% in

the project area. The pople belonging to general category people are lowest i.e. 17%.

Chart: - 3.13, Population in project Affected Villages


The comparative details of population status of all villages coming in the project

affected area are depicted through following bar chart.

50

426 421

9 0

23050

15010

899

607

1530

616

404

614

338

1147

628

0200400600800

10001200140016001800

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

SC / ST IN PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES

SC Population ST Population

GENERAL17%

OBC22%

SC10%

ST51%

POPULATION IN PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES



Chart: - 3.13.1 Population in project Affected Villages


3.2.11 Health Issues

Malaria is the major disease prevalent in the project-impacted villages in the past 2

years. It is also one of the major causes of deaths. Allopathic and ayurvedic treatments are

available. A primary health center is available in Shankarpur village, which is also referred

to as ‗hospital‘ by villagers.

3.2.12 Infrastructure Accessibility for Project Affected people

Electricity is used only for household purposes. The medical facility is insufficient as

only one hospital is present in Shankarpur. There are no Animal Husbandry facilities in the

area and even higher education facility is unavailable in the study area. The details of

Infrastructure to support their life style and bring-up livelihood status in tabulated in the

following table 3.11.

162

480 534

28 19

640

345

34 560

437

86201

10

353

892

613

258

50

426 421

9 0

230

50150

10

899

607

1530

616

404

614

338

1147

628

0200400600800

10001200140016001800

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

DEMOGRAPHY OF PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES

General OBC SC Population ST Population



Table: - 3.11, Infrastructure Availability-Project Impacted Villages

Facilities

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Weekly Hat

(Bazar) 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 4

Communication

Post office 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

Pucca road No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Kachcha road Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Banks etc.

Co-operative

societies 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 02

Others

Seed/Fertiliser

outlet 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 03

Community

Centre 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01

Fair Price Shop 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 8

Flour mill 1 1 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 10

Source: Group Discussions with villagers by LNC, October 2009

Note: The data corresponds to Numbers of Facility available in Villages.



3.2.13 Water Supply

There are no tapped water facilities in any of the villages. Wells, handpump

and ponds are the major source of water supply. In Bojha and Songara, there are few

Ponds; the primary source is well water.

Table: - 3.12, Facilities of Drinking Water Supply

So

urc

e

Mayapur

Bojh

a

Son

gara

Moha

np

ur

Sha

nkarp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Well water

9 4 20 4 18 18 7 4 14 98

Hand pump

6 10 11 7 4 10 8 4 2 62

Pond 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4


Chart: - 3.13, Drinking Water Supply


The above Graph reveals the comparative status of present facilities of

drinking water supply in the project affected area. The maximum number of

households in the overall villages is dependent on well for drinking water. The second

source of drinking water is hand pump and the last facility for drinking water is pond

which is in few villages.

9

4

20

4

18 18

74

14

610 11

74

108

42

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 02

05

10152025

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

FACILITIES OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY

Well water Hand pump Pond



Ground water table is normal as given in the following table 3.13.1

Table 3.13.1

Depth of water level (m below ground)

Sea

so

n

Mayapur

Bojh

a

Son

gara

Moha

np

ur

Sha

nkarp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Post Monsoon

Pre Mansoon

3.2.14 Sanitation

There are no toilets and open defecation is practiced in all the project affected

villages. There are few water sealed toilets in Songara only. These are mostly in

government quarters only.

3.2.15 Health Infrastructure

There is one primary health center only in Shankarpur. The nearest

Government Hospital and medicine outlet is 18 kms away from Shankarpur in

Premnagar.

3.2.16 Educational Infrastructure

All villages have a primary school to cater to their needs independently. The

village Songara have highest level of schooling facility i.e. Higher Secondary School

among all the villages. Kotaya have one High School. There is sufficient shooling

facility in the project affected area. The students have to move on an average 25 km.

from their village to Ambikapur for their higher studies in college.

Table:- 3.13, Educational Institutes

Insti

tute

s

Ma

yapur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Primary School

2 4 6 1 1 3 4 3 2 26

Middle school

1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 13

Secondary School

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 01



Insti

tute

s

Ma

yapur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Higher Secondary

School 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01


3.2.17 Social Organizations/ Community Structures

The Tribal people are socially bonded by the religion and relegios places.

Every village has atleast one temple. The villages having large population and

economically sound status than other project affected villages have more number of

temples.

Mahila mandals are induced organizations from the government through

various schemes and projects running by different line departments. Anganwadis are

as per the norms of government. The Bhajan/Kirtan Mandali are social groups

created by themselves. The village wise available community facilities are tabulated

in the following table, 3.13.

Table: - 3.13, Community Facilities

Fac

ilit

ies

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

ka

rpu

r

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Mahila

mandal 2 2 18 3 0 8 2 3 1 39

Anganwadi 3 5 6 2 2 6 5 3 4 36

Bhajan

mandali/Kir

tan

0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 07

Temples 1 4 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 18

Hospital 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02

Rest house 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01




The village Songara is situated at national high way and every department /

Organisation approaches to motivate the people / women. Because of high

motivation level, village Songara has extra ordinary high numbers of Mahila Mandals.

3.2.18 Festivals and fairs

Table 3.14 lists the festivals in the villages. The whole village participates in

such functions. The festivals are main source of entertainment for the villagers.

These types of activity also strengthen their social bonding to each other. The level of

celebration and involvement of people in different types of festivals is tabulated in the

following table 3.14.

Table: - 3.14, Festivals

Festivals Community

involved/

purpose

Month/

Season

Durati

on

Approximate strength of

gathering/Location

Navakhai Whole (new Agri

season)

July-Aug 1 day Whole village and

surrounding villages

Pausa Purnima Death of Kans

(uncle of lord

Krishna)

Nov-Dec 1 day Kirtan Mandals and their

spectators

Holi Death of Holika Feb / march 1 day Whole village

Deepawali Prayer to Godess

Laxmi

October/

November

1 day Whole village

Independence

day

Prayer

independence

song

August 15, 26

January

1 day Whole village

Dusshera Death of Ravan October 1 day Whole village

Visvakarma Prayer of the tools 1 day Whole village

Source: Group Discussions with villagers by LNC, Oct-09

Note : - 1. Festival Karma is celebrated at mayapur, sankarpur, and Dharampur by about 400 people.

2. Independence day is celebrated at all eduvcational institutions

situated in the project affected area. .



3.3 ADDITIONAL INFROMATIONS RELATED R&R POLICY 2005 OF GOVT. OF C.G.

3.3.1 Project affected Population

The details of Project Affected population are given in the following table, 3.15. The

data is based on the socio-economic survey done for this specific project. The major share

lies with the Schedule Tribe population.

Table: - 3.15, Details of Social Group Matrix of Project Affected Families

(Including Encroachers)

So

cia

l g

rou

p/c

aste

Ma

yapur

Bo

jha

So

ng

ara

Mo

ha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Ko

taya

Sa

kalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dh

ara

mp

ur

Tota

l

%

Scheduled

tribe 899 607 1530 616 404 614 338 1147 628 6783 51%

Scheduled

cast 50 426 421 9 0 230 50 150 10 1346 10%

OBC

0 437 86 201 10 353 892 613 258 2850 21%

General

162 480 534 28 19 640 345 34 56 2298 17%

Total

1111 1950 2571 854 433 1837 1625 1944 952 13277 100%




3.3.1.1 Project affected Khatedars (Land Holders)

The details of Project Affected Khatedars (Land Holders) is tabulated in the

following table, 3.16. There are total 1956 land holders in the project affected area.

The revenue records reveals that maximum land holders are residing in village

Bhoja i.e. 648 and minimum in village Shakalpur. The details can be adjudged from

the following table.

Table: - 3.16,

Classification of Khatedars based on Quantity of Land Holding -(Including Encroachers)

Cla

ss

/ca

te

go

ry

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Land up to

0.5 Ha 175 400 157 44 44 27 2 1 68 918

Between 0.5

HA and 2

Ha

147 204 181 72 51 14 1 5 79 754

2 Ha and

above 56 44 110 23 31 4 16 284

Total 378 648 448 139 126 45 3 6 163 1956

Source: Land Records made available by project proponent.

Numbers of Khatedars are not equal to Nos of households, because the people

residing in one household have 1 khata or more than 1 khata or even no khata (land

holding). (Khatedar means a person having a piece of land or numbers of land holding in

his own name.) A family may comprise of any one or more khatedars or even it may have

not any one khatedar.

3.3.1.2 Land Area wise % of Project affected Khatedars (Land Holders)

The pie chart generated from the table no. 3.16 reveals that major population have

small land pieces i.e up to 0.5 ha. Only. The extent of land holdings can be adjudged from

the following graph.



Chart, 3.14 Percentages of Landholdings


3.3.1.2 Land Acquisition wise % of Project affected Khatedars (Land Holders)

Followig table no. 3.17 incorporates the number of landholders (Khatedar) with

respect to the area of land to be acquired from their whole land in possesion.

Table: - 3.17, Classification of Khatedars based on Percentage land acquired (Including Enchroachers)

Qty

. o

f la

nd

to a

cq

uir

e

in %

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

100% 378 605 371 113 109 44 2 3 124 1749

Between

75% and

100%

0 18 47 15 14 0 0 0 22 116

Between

50% and

75%

0 12 14 5 2 0 0 0 8 41

Between 0 4 9 4 0 0 1 1 6 25

Land up to 0.5 Ha47%

Between 0.5 HA and 2 Ha

39%

2 Ha and above14%

KHATEDAR % BASED ON QUANTITY OF LAND HOLDINGS



Qty

. o

f la

nd

to a

cq

uir

e

in %

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

25% and

50%

Less than

25% 0 9 7 2 1 1 0 2 3 25

Total 378 648 448 139 126 45 3 6 163 1956


Chart, 3.15 Percentages of Landholdings


The above pie chart reveals that whole lands of 90% of Project Affected Land

Holders are proposed for acquisition. There are 6% of land holders whos land between

75% to less than 100% is comin within project area. Other details can be adjudged from

the graph it self.

Whole Land90%

Between 75% and 100%

6%

Between 50% and 75%2% Between 25% and

50%1%

Less than 25%1%

Khatedars in %, based on Percentage of land to be acquired



3.4 PRESENT STATUS AND INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE PROJECT AREA

( AS PER THE CENSUS 2001)

There are 9 villages falling in the project area. The details of Demography, Literacy,

health, irrigation facilities, land use, electricity, agricultural production, and village level

infrastructures are tabulated in the following tables as a base line.

3.4.1 AREA, POPULATION

The villages coming within the project area are under the administrative control of

Tahsil ,Pratappur and district Surguja.

Table: - 3.18, Area, Population of the Project Area

S.N

o.

VIL

L_

NA

ME

AR

EA

To

tal H

ou

se

Ho

ld

To

tal

Po

pu

lation

To

tal M

ale

Wo

rkin

g

Po

pu

lation

To

tal F

em

ale

SC

Po

pu

lation

SC

Ma

le

SC

Fe

male

ST

Po

pu

lation

ST

Ma

le

ST

Fe

ma

le

1

Mayapur

(Mendardand) 438 166 932 462 197 470 2 1 1 843 418 425

2 Bojha 603 345 1567 803 271 764 270 144 126 540 271 269

3 Songara 304 450 2374 1209 137 1165 20 9 11 1628 816 812

4

Shankarpur

(Lipgi) 291 62 343 168 131 175 0 0 0 316 158 158

5

Shakalpur

(Semariya) 584 317 1604 770 263 834 60 33 27 570 266 304

6 Koteya 956 355 1685 868 430 817 172 97 75 587 298 289

7 Dharampur 544 244 1239 648 245 591 10 7 3 709 375 334

8 Tulsi 731 280 1400 695 329 705 130 55 75 772 399 373

9 Mohanpur 407 146 733 366 183 367 0 0 0 546 276 270

Total 4858 2365 11877 5989 2186 5888 664 346 318 6511 3277 3234

Source: - Census of India 2001.



The total area of the villages falling within the project area is 4423 ha. The toal

population is 10735. The other detail can be adjusted through the graph.

.

Chart: - 3.14, Area, Population of the Project Area


The above Graph explains about the details of demography of the project affected

area.

Chart: - 3.15, Village wise Area (in Ha.)


AREA AND POPULATION OF THE STUDY AREA

4423

2138

10735

2186

5430 5305

534 291 243

5758

2891 2867

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

AREA T_HH T_P W_P T_M T_F SC_P SC_M SC_F ST_P ST_M ST_F

AREA,POPULATION

NU

MB

ER

S

438

603

304 291

584

956

544

731

407

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

IN H

A.

VILLAGES

AREA IN HA.




Kotaya is the village having the maximum area while on the other hand Shankarpur

village has minimum area within the project area. Area of other village comparatively can

be seen in the above graph.

Chart: - 3.16, Total Household


The above Graph Reveals about the Total Households of 9 villages under the

Project affected Area. The Graph further explains about the village, Songara and Koteya

having the maximum Number of households in project area. While on the other hand,

Shankarpur and Mohanpur having the less Number of Household under the project

affected Area.

TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

166

345

450

62

317355

244280

146

050

100150200250

300350400450500

May

apur

Bojha

Son

gara

Sha

nkar

pur

Sha

kalpur

Kot

eya

Dha

ram

pur

Tulsi

Moh

anpu

r

VILLAGES

NU

MB

ER

S




3.4.2 HEALTH AND EDUCATION

Table: - 3.19, Health and Education of the Project Area

S.N

o.

VIL

L_

NA

ME

Ed

uca

tio

na

l

facili

tie

s

Pri

ma

ry S

ch

oo

l

Mid

dle

Sch

oo

l

Se

co

nd

ary

Sch

ool

Se

nio

r

Se

co

nd

ary

Sch

ool

Me

dic

al

facili

tie

s

Allo

path

ic

Dis

pen

sa

ry

Ma

tern

ity a

nd

Ch

ild W

elfa

re

Ce

ntr

e

Ch

ild W

elfa

re

Ce

ntr

e

Pri

ma

ry H

ealth

Ce

ntr

e

1 Mayapur

(Mendardand) 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

2 Bojha 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

3 Songara 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1

4 Shankarpur

(Lipgi) 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

5 Shakalpur

(Semariya) 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

6 Koteya 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

7 Dharampur 1 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1

8 Tulsi 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

9 Mohanpur 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Total 9 16 6 2 1 16 1 1 1 2


.

Chart: - 3.17, Health and Education of the Project Area


16

5

21

16

1 12

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

P_SCH M_SCH S_SCH S_S_SCH MEDI_FACMCW_CNTR CWC PH_CNTR

NU

MB

ER

S

HEALTH , EDUCATION

HEALTH AND EDUCATION OF THE STUDY AREA



The above Graph explains about Health and Education of the project affected area.The

Education facility explained above are:-Primary school-16 in Numbers , Middle school – 5

in Numbers , secondary school -2 , Senior secondary school -1.There are Total 16

Medical facility as well child welfare centre in the projected area .

Chart: - 3.18, Project Area and Medical Facility

Source: Census of India 2001

The above Graphs from Cart No. 3.17 to 3.18 explains about the Medical Facility of

9 villages under the project affected area. As shown in the Graph, Mayapur, Bojha, Tulsi

and Shankarpur have the Medical Facilities related to allopathy while on the other hand

Songara and dharampur have the less Number of medical Facilities. Village Dharampur

and songara also provides the facility of Welfare and Health centre.

PROJECT AREA, MEDICAL FACILITY

2 2

1

2 2 2

1

2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0

1

0 00 0 0 0 0 0

1

0 00 0 0 0 0 0

1

0 00 0

1

0 0 0

1

0 0

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Maya

pur

Bojha

Songara

Shankarp

ur

Shakalp

ur

Koteya

Dharam

purTul

si

Moha

npur

VILLAGES

NU

MB

ER

S

MEDI_FAC ALL_DISP MCW_CNTR CWC PH_CNTR



3.4.3 WATER AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Table: - 3.20, Water and other Infrastructure in the project affected village S

.No

.

VIL

L_

NA

ME

Dri

nkin

g W

ate

r

facili

ty

We

ll W

ate

r

Tu

be

We

ll

Ha

nd

pum

p

Ap

pro

ach

-

Pa

ve

d R

oa

d

Ap

pro

ach

-

Mu

d R

oa

d

Ap

pro

ach

-

Fo

ot

Pa

th

Po

we

r sup

ply

Ele

ctr

icity fo

r

all

pu

rposes

1 Mayapur

(Mendardand) 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1

2 Bojha 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1

3 Songara 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1

4 Shankarpur

(Lipgi) 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1

5 Shakalpur

(Semariya) 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1

6 Koteya 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1

7 Dharampur 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

8 Tulsi 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

9 Mohanpur 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0

Total 10 8 1 7 3 7 1


Chart: - 3.19, Water-Infrastructure within Project Affected Area


.

10

8

1

8

1

3

7

2

10

8

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

NU

MB

ER

S

WATER, INFRASTUCTURE

WATER AND INFRASTUCTURE OF THE STUDY AREA



The Graph shown above explains about the drinking water facility available in the

project area. The facility of Drinking water and power supply is quite adequate. The Graph

shown above also reveals about the Electricity facilities in the project affected villages. The

Facility of Power Supply is adequate and equal in all villages of the project area of project

The power suppy was not therein villages Tulsi and Mohanpur, during 2001..

Chart: - 3.20, Water Facility of the Project Area

SOURCE: - CENSUS OF INDIA 2001

The above Graph explains about the drinking water facility available in the villages

falling under the project. Dharampur have sufficient Drinking water facility as compared to

the other villages under the project area. The facility of Tubewell is only found in Songara.

The facility of Well and tubewell is quite common in all villages under the project affected

Area.

1 1 1 1 1 1

2

1 11 1 1 1 1 1

0

1 1

0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0

1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0

1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

PROJECT AREA, WATER FACILITY

DRNK_WAT_F WELL TUBEWELL HANDPUMP



3.4.4 PROJECT AREA, PRODUCTION

The villagers of the villages coming under the project area also produce other

goods other than agricultural items. Beside agriculture they make mats, bamboo pots,

earhen pots and brooms. Village wise details are given in the following table no. 3.20.

Table: - 3.20, Production, except Agricultural items in project affected Project area

S.No. VILL_NAME Manufactured Item No. 1

Manufactured Item No. 2

Manufactured Item No. 3

Land

Forest

(Revenue

Forest)

1

Mayapur

(Mendardand)

2 Bojha

3 Songara MATS BAMBOO POTS

4

Shankarpur

(Lipgi) MATS BAMBOO POTS

5

Shakalpur

(Semariya) MATS BAMBOO POTS

EARTHEN

POTS

6 Koteya MATS BROOM

FOREST

PRODUCTS

7 Dharampur MATS MAT

8 Tulsi 16

9 Mohanpur 10

Total 26




3.4.5 PROJECT AREA, IRRIGATION FACILITY

Table: - 3.21, Irrigation Facility of the Project area

S.No. VILL_NAME Canal Govt.

Well (without electricity)

Well (with electricity )

Tube-well (without

electricity) Tank River Other

1

Mayapur

(Mendardand) 0 0 7 0 0 7 6

2 Bojha 0 2 0 0 1 7 7

3 Songara 0 17 0 10 0 0 0

4

Shankarpur

(Lipgi) 0 4 0 5 0 0 5

5

Shakalpur

(Semariya) 0 14 0 0 0 0 24

6 Koteya 0 2 12 0 0 0 10

7 Dharampur 0 9 0 11 2 0 0

8 Tulsi 7 2 0 0 0 0 0

9 Mohanpur 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total 7 52 19 26 3 14 52


3.4.6 PROJECT AREA, LAND USE

Table: - 3.22, Land Use of the Project area

S.No. VILL_NAME Total Irrigated

Area Unirrigated Area

Cultivable waste Land

Area not available for cultivation

1

Mayapur

(Mendardand) 20 295 75 48

2 Bojha 17 414 124 48

3 Songara 27 50 180 47

4 Shankarpur (Lipgi) 14 205 58 14

5 Shakalpur (Semariya) 38 354 163 29

6 Koteya 24 552 276 104

7 Dharampur 22 348 147 27

8 Tulsi 9 468 204 34

9 Mohanpur 2 192 102 101

Total 173 2878 1329 452




Chart: - 3.22, Land Use of the Project area


The Graph shown above explains about the Land use of 9 villages falling under the

project Area. Land forest denotes the revenue forest available in the village, which is found

in only Tulsi and Mohanpur .The other villages are devoid of revenue forest. The utilization

of land by Koteya is used at the best level as compared to the other villages of the project

Area. The Use of land in Mohanpur is least as compared to the other project Area.

3.5 Key Issues-Project Affected People

The major issues related to the project affected people include:

First, low educational levels accompanied with no specialized skill development.

Due to the likely loss of livelihood of the villagers due to the project, their economic

situation is likely to be adversely affected temporarily. Provision of adequate training so as

to make them capable for employment in mines or other self employment mechanisms is

therefore, a must.

Second, majority of the villagers are below poverty line. This is the result of an

unsteady income. Agricultural operations are rain fed and therefore, the yield is dependent

on monsoons. There are no occupational diversifications. Subsidiary occupations such as

collection of leaves from forest areas are the only available options. Dependency on

community resources is therefore, very high.

0 0 0 0 0 0 016 10

75

124

180

58

163

276

147

204

102

48 48 47

1429

104

27 34

101

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

NU

MB

ER

S

VILLAGES

LAND USE OF THE PROJECT AREA

LAND_FORES CULT_WASTE AREA_NA_CU



Third, the status of women is very poor. Since these villages are likely to be

relocated away from their existing settlements, women are likely to feel the impact of

relocation adversely. Due to relocation they are likely to lose their community resources

and any income from it. Therefore, adequate mitigation measures are required to address

this issue.

Fourth, the existing availability and accessibility to infrastructure (physical and

social) is poor. All the houses are kuchha (except one) and there are minimal or no

sanitary provisions. Also, the source of water supply is not safe. Provision of infrastructure

is therefore, a critical element as part of resettlement planning.

3.5.1 Details of Displaced families whose House is being affected

A. Details of khatedars whose house is being acquired for the Project is given in the Table

-3.5.1

Table: - 3.23, Displaced Khatedars whose House is being affected (Including Enchroachers)

Cate

go

ry

Ma

ya

pu

r

Bo

jha

So

ng

ara

Mo

han

pu

r

Sh

an

ka

rpu

r

Ko

taya

Sa

ka

lpu

r

Tu

lsi

Dha

ram

pu

r

To

tal

Home stead on private land 378 126 504

Total 378 126 504


3.6 BASELINE:- Above Studies Following baseline is the result of study of analysis which denotes present condition of the villages during the year 2009. 3.6.1 Area

The Project affected village Area is 4423 ha. as per Census 2001, while only

2624.18 Ha. area is being taken in the project.

Number of Total Households are 2138 as per the Census 2001, while during the

socio-economic survey it is 2989.



3.6.2 Population

The total population of the study Area is 10735 as per the Census 2001; while

during the socio-economic survey it is 13277.

The working population is 2186 as per the Census 2001, while during socio -

economic survey it is 3049.

The ratio of male and female population is 1000:983 as per the Census 2001, while

during socio - economic survey it is 1000:893.

3.6.3 Health

The Health under the study area of Project comprises of medical facilities -16 In

numbers as per the Census 2001, while during socio - economic survey it is 18 in

Numbers.

Number of Maternity and child welfare centre -5 in numbers as per the Census

2001, while during socio - economic survey it is 15 in Numbers.

3.6.4 Education

The Educational facilities which are provided under the study area of project are the

primary school-16 in numbers as per the Census 2001, while during socio -

economic survey it is 26 in Numbers.

Middle school-5 In numbers as per the Census 2001, while during socio - economic

survey it is 13 in Numbers.

Secondary school -2 in numbers as per the Census 2001, while during socio -


Senior Secondary school-1 In numbers as per the Census 2001, while during socio

- economic survey it is 2 in Numbers.

3.6.5 Power & Water facilities

The water facilities under the study area of project comprises of the drinking water

facility that is 10 in numbers as per the Census 2001, while during socio - economic

survey it is 164 in Numbers.



The Number of well in the area is 8 in numbers as per the Census 2001, while

during socio - economic survey it is 98 in Numbers.

Handpump are 8 in Number as per the Census 2001, while during socio -


Well, Handpumpand and pond are the main sourse of drinking water for the

households.

3.6.6 Production

Production other than agriculture in the project affected villages is only items from

Bamboo, earthen pots and mats.

3.6.7 Landuse

The land as per the census 2001, comprises of Irrigated-167 in Ha, Unirrigated-

2617 in Ha, Cultivated- 1210 Ha, and waste land not used for cultivation- 399 in Ha,

under the project affected area which is used for the purpose of livelihood of the

household.



3.7 VISUAL STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.7.1 INFRASTRUCTRE



3.7.2 INFRASTRUCTURE



3.7.8 AFFECTED AREA



3.7.9 AFFECTED AREA



3.7.10 AFFECTED AREA



3.7.11 AFFECTED AREA



3.7.12 STATUS OF FAMILY



3.7.13 STATUS OF VILLAGES



3.7.14 STATUS OF VILLAGES



CHAPTER – 4

PROJECT IMPACT



CHAPTER – IV

PROJECT IMPACT

4.1 DETAILS OF THE AREA AFFECTED

(i) Project impact on area

33.63 sq. km is the area of the allotted block while the PROJECT AREA is 33.32 sq.

Km. The proposed mine lease area covers the habitation and lands of 9 villages. Table 4.1

lists the identified villages.

Table: - 4.1, Villages to Be Affected Due To Project

Status Name of village Anticipated Social Impact

Within Project

Boundary-

relocation and/or

acquisition

Mayapur

Shankarpur

Loss of village land (habitation and

agricultural);

Displacement of population;

Songara

Bojha

Mohanpur

Dharampur

Shakalpur

Koteya

Tulsi

Loss of livelihood due to loss of

agricultural land.

The whole village land of Shankarpur and Mayapur will be acquired due to open

cast mining. Agricultural land of Songara, Bojha, Mohanpur, Dharampur, Shakalpur,

Koteya and Tulsi village will only be acquired. The Abadi area of these villages will not be

taken in the project.

(ii) LOSS OF LAND

The entire inhabited portion of the villages Mayapur and Shankarpur are falling

within the project area. The agricultural land of village Songara, Bojha, Mohanpur,

Dharampur, Shakalpur, Tulsi and Koteya is also falling within the Project Area. Land use of

both agricultural, non-agricultural, waste land will be changed due to the project.



(A) REVENUE LAND

The Table 4.2 gives the extent of land loss in each village. Private agriculture land

(single crop rain fed or two crop irrigated) and house hold land (Abadi) would be affected.

The household area tabulated in the following table is the Abadi area in possession of

residents. It is included in the village area.

TABLE:- 4.2-I, REVENUE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED

(A) REVENUE LAND (AREA IN HECT.)

SL. NO VILLAGE GOVT. LAND

( INCLUDES

REVENUE FOREST)

PRIVATE LAND TOTAL

(col. 3 + col 4) AGRICULTURE

(INCLUDES ADIVASI AND

NON ADIVASI PVT. LAND)

HOUSE HOLD

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 Mayapur 113.04 419.26 45.64 532.30

2 Bojha 147.37 431.65 -- 579.02

3 Songara 191.14 638.0 -- 829.14

4 Mohanpur 41.64 181.13 -- 222.77

5 Shankarpur 49.06 171.41 25.20 220.47

6 Kotaya 22.83 29.38 -- 52.21

7 Sakalpur 0.58 0.84 -- 1.42

8 Tulsi 5.33 3.44 -- 8.77

9 Dharampur 46.37 131.71 -- 178.08

TOTAL 617.37 2006.82 70.84 2624.18

Source: Govt. Land Records & Socio-Economic Survey by LNC, August 09 to November 09

CHART: - 4.1-I, REVENUE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED


Mayapur Bojha Songara Mohanpur Shankarpur Koteya Sakalpur Tulsi Dharampur

Govt. Land 113.04 147.37 191.14 41.64 49.06 22.83 0.58 5.33 46.37

Agriculture 419.26 431.65 638 181.13 171.41 29.38 0.84 3.44 131.71

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Axis

Title

REVENUE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED(AREA IN HECT.)



The above Graph explains about the comparative status of Land to be required for

the project. There are 9 villages falling under this project. The project is aquiring residential

area of two villages that is Mayapur and Shankarpur.The Govt. Land and agricultural land

of the villages Songara, Bojha and Mohanpur will be aquired more as compared to Kotya,

Tulsi and Sakalpur. The Sakalpur is the least affected village.

CHART: - 4.2-II, REVENUE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED

ADIVASI LAND (ST) NON-ADIVASI

LAND

CHHOTE JHAD KA

JUNGLE

OTHER GOVT.

LAND

TOTAL AREA

1289.34 717.48 467.97 149.39 2624.18

CHART: - 4.2-I, REVENUE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED


CHART: - 4.2.1, PERSENTAGE OF REVENUE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED


0

1000

2000

3000

Adivasi Land (ST)

Non-Adivasi Land

Chhote Jhad ka jungle

Other Govt. Land

Total Area

1289.34717.48

467.97149.39

2624.18

Revenue Land to be Acquired

Adivasi Land (ST) Non-Adivasi Land Chhote Jhad ka jungle Other Govt. Land Total Area

Adivasi Land (ST)49%

Non-Adivasi Land 27%

Chhote Jhad ka jungle 18%

Other Govt. Land 6%

Revenue Land to be Acquired in %

Adivasi Land (ST) Non-Adivasi Land Chhote Jhad ka jungle Other Govt. Land



The Pie-chart shown above explains about the Revenue Land to be acquired under

the project area in terms of %. The area of agricultural land (76%) comprises of Adivasi

and non adivasi private land is maximum as compared to the Revenue Forest Land 18%

(Chhote Jhad ka Jungle) and Govt. land (6%) to be aquired under the project area.

Chart: - 4.3, House Hold area to be Acquired in %


The above Pie-chart explains about the distribution of house hold area to be

acquired. Out of total house hold land proposed to be acquired Mayapur and Shankarpur

holds 64% and 36% respectively. This area in included in total village area to be acquired.

(B) REVENUE FOREST LAND

The project area does not contain any forest area under the possession of the

forest department i.e. R.F. / P.F./Orange area/National Park/ Sanctuary. This has only

Chote Bade Jhar ke Jungle under the possession and control of revenue department. The

village wise revenue forest area is gien in the following Table no. 4.2.

64%

36%

HOUSE HOLD AREA TO BE ACQUIRED IN %

Mayapur Shankarpur



Table: - 4.2, Revenue Forest land to be acquired

SL. NO VILLAGE CHHOTE BADE JHAR KE

JUNGLE

1 2 3

1 Mayapur 97.18

2 Bojha 97.62

3 Songara 146.43

4 Mohanpur 24.30

5 Shankarpur 35.72

6 Kotaya 22.42

7 Sakalpur 0.39

8 Tulsi 4.06

9 Dharampur 39.85

TOTAL 467.97

Source: Land Records made available by project proponent

CHART: - 4.4, REVENUE FOREST LAND TO BE ACQUIRED


REVENUE FOREST LAND TO BE ACQUIRED

97.18 97.62

146.43

24.335.72

22.42

0.39 4.06

39.85

020406080

100120140160

May

apur

Bojha

Songa

ra

Moh

anpu

r

Shank

arpu

r

Kotay

a

Sakalpu

r

Tulsi

Dha

ram

pur

VILLAGES

NU

MB

ER

S

Mayapur Bojha Songara Mohanpur Shankarpur Kotaya Sakalpur Tulsi Dharampur



The above Graph shows comparative status about the Revenue forest land to be

acquired under the project affected area. Revenue forest of Songara, Bojha and Mayapur

are more than Tulsi, Sakalpur, Kotaya and Mohanpur.

CHART: - 4.5, REVENUE FOREST LAND TO BE ACQUIRED IN %


The above Pie-chart explains about the Revenue Forest to be acquired under the

project Area in terms of percentage. Songara (30%), Mayapur (21%), Bojha (21%) and

Dharampur (9%) have the maximum area of revenue forest to be acquired under the

project as compared to Shankarpur, Mohanpur, Kotaya and Tulsi. The Sakalpur has

negligible quantity of revenue forest land proposed for acquisition.

(iii) LOSS OF STRUCTURES

The number of structures that would be affected due to the project are given in

Table 4.3. The existing housing conditions in the villages are very poor. Kuchcha houses

are predominant.

REVENUE FOREST LAND TO BE ACQUIRED IN %

Sakalpur

0%Kotaya

5%

Tulsi

1%Dharampur

9% Mayapur

21%

Bojha

21%

Mohanpur

5%

Shankarpur

8%

Songara

30%



TABLE: - 4.3, DETAILS OF THE LOSS OF STRUCTURE

T

ype

of S

tructu

re

Ma

yap

ur

Bo

jha

So

ng

ara

Mo

ha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Ko

taya

Sa

kalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dh

ara

mp

ur

To

tal

A. Private

Structures

Residential 287 0 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 392

B. Community Structures

School 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4

Temple 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2

Anganwadi 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5

Panchayat Bhawan

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01

Source: Socio-Economic Survey and Group Discussion By Lnc, August 09 To November 09

Chart: - 4.6, Loss of Structure

Source: Socio-Economic Survey and Group Discussion by Lnc, August 09 to November 09

392

4 2 5 10

100

200

300

400

500

Residential School Temple Anganwadi Panchayat Bhawan

NO

. o

f S

tru

ctu

res

LOSS OF STRUCTURE



The above graph shows the loss of structure under the project affected Area. The

losses of Residential structures are maximum with respect to community structures.

Chart: - 4.7, Loss of Structure in %


The pie –chart shown above explains about the loss of structure under the project

affected area in terms of %.There is a huge loss of structure in the Residential sector

(97%) and least in community sector Anganwadi (1%), Temple (1%) and School (1%).

(iv) DISPLACEMENT OF POPULATION

Total 6587 persons blonging to 1494 families in which 971 families are included as

per the definition of family by the state government. Sub families as per Chhattisgarh

government rehabilitation policy are sons>18 years. Total families including sub-families

are 2465.

TABLE: - 4.4, PROJECT DISPLACED PERSONS AND LAND LOSERS

(INCLUDING ENCROACHERS)

Village Number of Persons

Number of Families

Number of subfamilies*

1 2 3 4 5

Mayapur Displacees 1111 287 104

Bojha Only Land losers 948 202 194

Residential97%

School1%

Temple1%Anganwadi

1%

Panchayat Bhawan0%

LOSS OF STRUCTURE IN %



Village Number of Persons

Number of Families

Number of subfamilies*

Songara Only Land losers 1754 340 309

Mohanpur Only Land losers 684 132 65

Shankarpur Displacees 433 105 41

Sakalpur Only Land losers 20 3 3

Tulsi Only Land losers 22 6 3

Dharampur Only Land losers 572 145 140

Kotiya Only Land losers 1043 274 112

Combined Displacees 1544 392 145

Only Land losers 5043 1102 826

Total (Displacees + Land losers)

6587 1494 971


The Number shown in column No 4 as number of families includes number of sub

families while the number of persons at column no. 3 corresponds to number of families at

column no. 4 only.

Chart: - 4.8, Project displaced persons and land losers


1111948

1754

684

433

20 22

572

1043

287202

340

132 1053 6

145274

104194

309

65 41 3 3140 112

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

May

apu

r

Bo

jha

Son

gara

Mo

han

pu

r

Shan

karp

ur

Saka

lpu

r

Tuls

i

Dh

aram

pu

r

Ko

tiya

DisplaceesOnly Land losersOnly Land losersOnly Land losersDisplaceesOnly Land losersOnly Land losersOnly Land losersOnly Land losers

Nu

mb

ers

Displaced person and Land Losers

No of Persons No of Familes No of subfamiles



The Graph shown above explains about the Displaced persons and land losers of

the project area.There are 9 villages falling under the project. Only residents of Mayapur,

and Shankarpur will be displaced and residence of other villages are only land losers.

Chart: - 4.8, Project displaced persons and land losers in %


The pie –chart shown above explains about the displaced persons and land losers

under the area of project in terms of % among all villages, displaced and land lossers.

Comparative extent is Songara(27%), Bojha(14%) , Dharampur(9%), koteya(16%) ,

mayapur(17%),Mohanpur (10%), Shankarpur(7%), Tulsi and Sakalpur have least quantity.

(v) DISPLACEMENT OF HOUSE HOLDS

Only residents of 2 villages Mayapur and Shankarpur are being affected. 99.55% of

Mayapur and 95.43% of the Shankarpur area of the whole village is coming under the

project. Total 392 families corresponding to 1544 persons will be displaced during the

execution of the project. Details are given in the following Table No. 4.5.

Table: - 4.5, Village Wise Details of to be displaced Population

S. NO. Village Effected Area Percentage

No of household No of person

1 2 3 4 5

1. Mayapur 99.55% 287 1111

2. Bojha 0% 0 0

3. Songara 0% 0 0

4. Mohanpur 0% 0 0

5. Shankarpur 95.43% 105 433

Displacees Mayapur17%

Only Land losers Bojha14%

Only Land losers Songara

27%

Only Land losers Mohanpur

10%

Displacees Shankarpur

7%

Only Land losers Sakalpur

0%

Only Land losers Tulsi0%

Only Land losers Dharampur

9%

Only Land losers Kotiya16%

Displaced person and Land Losers



S. NO. Village Effected Area Percentage


6. Kotaya 0% 0 0

7. Sakalpur 0% 0 0

8. Tulsi 0% 0 0

9. Dharampur 0% 0 0

Total 95.89% 392 1544 Source: Socio-Economic Survey by LNC, August 09 to November 09

Note: 1. Column no 3, Percentage Based on Total Area / Required Area

government land records made available by project proponent.

2. The House appearing as one entity in village is shared by more than one

family. But, during the collection of data the area occupied by each family is

taken in to account.

3. The data in column no 4 and 5 is based on Socio-Economic Survey.

Chart: - 4.9, Disturbed Population


The above Graph reveals about the comparative details of Disturbed Population

(Displacement of Households) within the project area.

287

0 0 0105

0 0 0 0

1111

0 0 0

433

0 0 0 00

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

NU

MB

ERS

DETAILS OF DISTURBED POPULATION




Chart: - 4.9, Disturbed Population in %


The above Pie-chart explains about the comparative status of disturbed population

within project area among Mayapur (73%) and Shankarpur (27%).

(vi) LOSS OF LIVELIHOOD

The villagers would lose their livelihood due to loss of land. Few villagers have

permanent employment. Most of them are dependent on cultivation. Several others are

engaged in labour or are providing services such as blacksmith, small businesses, etc.

Loss of land and displacement would therefore, result in loss of livelihood for all the

villagers.

Chart: - 4.10, Livelihood Loss

73%

0%

0%

0%

27%

0%

0%

0%

0%

DETAILS OF DISTURBED POPULATION



0500

10001500200025003000

Total

Agriculture 2376

Business 90

Others 501

Grand Total 2967

Nu

mb

er

Livelihood Loss



The above graph reveals about the livelihood loss in different sectors due to the

project. Maximum people dependent on agriculture will loose their tool of livelihood. Other

sector includes the agricultural labour too along with the special service provider like,

barber, carpenter, blacksmith etc. The community engaged in the usiness will also loose

their livelihood. Total 2967 persons will loose their tools for the livelihood.

(vi) LOSS OF OTHER COMMUNITY ASSETS

Apart from loss of private assets, other community assets such as trees, wells,

ponds are also lost. Trees such as Jamun, Bamboo, Kendu, Aonla, Gamhar, Lemon,

IProject areai, Mahua, Munga, Sal, Mango, Kathal, Ber and other tree falling within the

Project Area will also be lost.

a. Drinking Water Infrastructre

Table: - 4.6, Drinking Water Infrastructre

So

urc

e

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Well water

30 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 36

Hand pump

6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 10


b. Education Infrastructure

Table: - 4.7, Education Infrastructre

So

urc

e

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

School 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4



c. Community Infrastructure

Table: - 4.8, Community Infrastructre

So

urc

e

Ma

yap

ur

Bojh

a

So

ng

ara

Moha

np

ur

Sh

an

karp

ur

Kota

ya

Sakalp

ur

Tuls

i

Dhara

mpur

To

tal

Temple 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2

Anganwadi 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5

Panchayat Bhawan

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Chart: - 4.11, Loss of Community Structures

The above table no. 4.6 to 4.8 narrates about the loss of drinking water and

structures avaialbe in the Mayapur and Shankarpur villages for community use. The

comparative status can be adjudged through the above bar chart no. 4.11.

46

4 25

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

Drinking Water School Temple Anganwadi Panchayat Bhawan

NO

. o

f S

tru

ctu

res

Loss of Community Structures



CHAPTER – 5

REHABILITATION SCHEME



CHAPTER –V

REHABILITATION SCHEME

5.1. Justification for displacement

It is a site-based project; Govt. of India Ministry of Coal has allocated Shankarpur

Coal Block to CMDC to supply coal to the 500/ 1000 MW thermal power station of CSEB /

ICPL . The 1000 MW power plant has been planed just at a distance of 6 KM from

Shankarpur Block by ICPL. As per the detail exploration carried out by MECL the

Shankarpur Block having total mineable reserves of 252 million tonnes, which is sufficient

for the requirement of the 1000 MW power plant of ICPL for a period of 45 years.

The development of Shankarpur Coal Block will assist the State in bringing down

deficit of electrical energy in the State. Since the power plant is planned at the pit head it

will also lower down the cost of production of per unit of electricity.

The establishment of the mine will mark the begging of industrialization in the area.

The facility such as health care, units, communication facility and the thermal power unit to

which this mine is captive will have significant positive impact of socio economic and

infrastructure in the area. The loss agriculture land for mining will change the economic

from farming based to secondary and tertiary activity based, proper and sensitive

resettlement and rehabilitation of displaced person can create more opportunities for

urbanization, education and self- employment. Care has been taken that no re-

displacement of the displacees shall taken place in near future.

5.2. Social Welfare activities and Development Plan for the Project affected area

CMDC feels its moral and social responsibility towards the society to develop the

social and living standard of the inhabitants, of not only that of Project affected families,

but also of the total area where the Project is coming up without disturbing their social

customs. With keeping this view in mind, CMDC plans to develop following infrastructures

in and in the nearby areas for the benefit of the residents of Prem Nagar Block, where the

Project is coming up.



5.2.1. Health.

i). CMDC shall provide financial assistance to existing Hospital at Prem Nagar / Shiv

Nagar block for creating better medical facilities for the benefit of residents of the area.

ii). CMDC shall also conduct special Medical Camps in the affected villages for check-up

and provide medical assistance and distribution of medicines to the families of the

residents of the area.

5.2.2. Education.

i). CMDC shall provide financial assistance to existing schools for upgrading the

school building by adding Class-rooms, providing drinking water facilities, providing fans,

providing equipments for Science Laboratory, and playing equipments etc.

ii). CMDC shall allow admissions to the children of the affected villages in the school

opened in the CMDC Township.

5.2.3. Community Development.

i). CMDC shall help Village Panchayats of the affected villages for providing facilities like

drinking water, electrification, making of approach roads, repair & improvements in

Community Centers etc.

ii). CMDC shall have active participation in local functions of the area and provide possible

necessary help wherever necessary.

iii). CMDC shall provide Training to the members of displaced families in various fields

through Government organization for enhancing their income level.

2. CMDC shall allot one per cent of its net profits for the purpose of Social &

Community Development programs of the area.



5.3 Employment and other Oportunities

On opening of mine, large number of employment opportunities, alterative job

opportunities and self employment opportunities will be available, not only in Shankarpur

(Bhatgaon II) Project, but also in ancillaries that will come up with the opening of mine.

Right from the developmental period, work will be available for skilled, semi skilled and

unskilled categories, mainly through big contractors and large companies associated with

development and operation of mine. Regular employment opportunities would be available

in progressive / phased manner, as the mine production starts and reaches to rated

production capacity. Anyone eligible member of a Project Affected /Displaced family will be

provided an employment as per their Skill, Qualification and Physical Fitness.

5.4 Approval and Implimentation

This rehabilitation plan/scheme will be put before the competent authority for

approval and a MOU ( Memorandom of Understanding) will be signed between CMDC and

District collector Sarguja (Ambikapur) as per the format given in appendex-3 of ―An Ideal

Rehabilitation Policy 2007 of State of Chhattisgarh (As amended).

5.5 Definitiions

1. Inhabitant: Ordinari ly inhabitant of the vil lages means person indulged

in agriculture work (farming & labors on own land or others)

while residing at village or artisan craft men or working person.

2. Affected person: Affected person means such person who lives generally at

least 3(Three) years prior to the date of notif ication under

section -4 (Four)of land acquisition act in the area which is needed

for the project and who has been doing business or any other work

for his livelihood or who has been forming on his own land or

others land for at least 3 years.



3. Affected family: Affected family includes any affected person his wife/ husband

minor children and aged parents, widow mother or sister and

unmarried daughter dependent on the affected person.

4. Displaced person: Displaced person means any land owner, govt. lease holder

or owner of any property who has been displaced from his land or

property on account of acquisition of land including acquisition of

Abadi land.

5. Displaced family: Displaced family means any displaced person, his wife /

husband minor children and aged parents widow mother or

sister and unmarried daughter depended on affected person.

Major / adult son of the displaced person who has

come into the category of adult from the date of the

publication of notif ication under section 4(Four) of land

acquisition act, will be considered as a separate family.

6. Landless farmer: Land less farmers means such person who doesn't possess

any agriculture land in the name of any member of his house

and who works on others agricultural land.

7. Small farmer: Small farmer means such farmer who has 1 hectare un-irrigated

land or 0-50 Hectare irrigated land of his ownership or his family's

ownership.

8. Agricultural labor: Agricultural labor means such person who doesn't hold his

own agricultural land & works as a labor on other's agricultural land.

9. Service land of Kotwar: Service land of Kotwar means as such defined

Chhattisgarh land Revenue code 1959.

10. Landless family: Land less family means 'non-agricultural displaced family.



5.6 Compensation

Compensation will be based on following criteria;

All families/people will be eligible for the compensation that comes

within one or more category defined in 5.3. of this document.

Government land encroacher, on the recommendation of district level

committee land and those encroachers who have been in scheduled

area before 1990.

For other construction work on the encroached land

before 1990.

Minimum sum of 50,000 per-acre for barren land 75,000 per acre for

non-irrigated (single crop) and 1,00,000 Rs./acre for irrigated

(Double crop) land.

No compensation shall be paid to Kotwars for Service Land but

they will be given Land in place of the acquired-land.

Compensation for Trees and infrastructures on the land will be

given as per the recommendation of committee constituted for

this specific purpose or as per the order of district collector.

Each displaced family, who is to be rehabilitated will be given

minimum a turn- sum aid of Rs. 11,000(Eleven Thousand) as

rehabilitation grant.

Displaced families having cattle will be transported to a new place

free of cost from the acquired area under the supervision of district

administration. If displaced family doesn't take privilege of the

transport, then he will be given minimum lump- sum grant of Rs

l,000 (One Thousand).

5.6.1 The inference for financial allocation for the implimnetation of rehabilitation plan

has been taken from the State Governemnet running project and sactioned

rehabilitation scheme for the Naya Raipur Development Authority. The

financial projection has been based on the per unit average cost of

rehabilitation of different components of the rehabilitation scheme as

tabulated in table no. -----. Lump sum unit rate is based on experience

inferred from existing status of the project area and their rehabilitation cost



at present situation/status. Unit for the different components of the scheme

is as under;

Table: -5.1, Implimnetation of Rehabilitation Plan

S.N. Item/Details of works Rate in Rs. Unit

1 Cost of Agriculture Land as per the Revenue

Authorities 1375000.00 / Ha.

2 Cost of Badi Land as per the Revenue Autorities 825000.00 / Ha.

3 Cost of Govt Revenue land as per the Revenue

Autorities

3.1 Chhote jhad ka jungle 920000.00 / Ha.

3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha.

4 Cost of Water Facility

4.1 Tubewell

4.1.1 Deep 200 Feet 29100.00 / Tubewell



4.2 Well

4.2.1 10 Feet Dia & 35 Feet Deep :(Kachcha) 30000.00 / Well

4.2.2 10 Feet Dia & 35 Feet Deep :(Pucca) 45000.00 / Well

4.2.3 12 Feet Dia & 40 Feet Deep: (Kachcha) 35000.00 / Well

4.2.4 12 Feet Dia & 40 Feet Deep: (Pucca) 50000.00 / Well

5 Green Barrier Development Around of village 1800000.00 /Ha.

6 Cost on employment of 1 member of each project

affected family

6.1 Skilled 2% of Total Project affected Families = 4

@Rs. 7500/-month 7500.00 /person /year

6.2 Semi-skilled 10% of Total Project affected

Families = 21@Rs. 5000/-month 5000.00 /person /year

6.3 unskilled 88 % of Total Project affected Families

= 187@Rs. 3000/-month 3000.00 /person /year

7

If employment is not provided, then 1 shop at the cost of company or maximum Rs.100000/- for

agricultural land development at another place or Rs. 100000/- cash.

100000.00 /person

8 Technical training to eligible candidates i.e. 5% of

PA families = 14 persons 50000.00 /person

9 Compensation for houses

9.1 Kachcha Houses: 200.00 /Sq. Ft.

9.2 Pucca Houses: 367.00 /Sq. Ft.

9.3 Aahata Nirman: (Kachcha) 700.00 /meter

9.4 Aahata Nirman: (Pucca) 1300.00 /meter

9.5 Fencing work : 139.00 /Number

9.6 Barbed Wire: 6.00 /meter

9.7 Baramda : (Kachcha) 70.00 /Sq. Ft.

9.8 Baramda : (Pucca) 128.00 /Sq. Ft.

10 Grant for construction of house 100000.00 /family

11 Grant for animal shade 10000.00 /family

12 Rehabilitiation assistance 11000.00 /family

13 Transportation charges on material/luggage 1000.00 /family

14 Cost of trees on private land 1000.00 /tree

15 Capacity enhancement training to 1 member of

each project affected families. 20000.00 /family

16 Upgradation of existing schools and its moderate

furnishing, situated in nearby project area

16.1 Primary Schools 50000.00 /school

16.2 Middle Sachool 1000000.00 /school



S.N. Item/Details of works Rate in Rs. Unit

16.3 Mahila Mandal 1000000.00

16.4 Angan badi 75000.00

16.5 Temple 100000.00

16.6 Bhajan Mandli/ Kirtan Bhawan 75000.00

17 Incentive to meritorious students ; awards etc. 10000.00 L.S.

18 Assistance to handicaped, widow and old aged

people in project affected villages 100000.00 L.S.

19 Revolving fund for women empowerment in

project affected villages through SHG groups 100000.00 L.S.

20 Expenditure on developemnt of agriculture in

project affected villages through introduction of new or innovative technologies, drip irrigation etc.

500000.00 L.S.

21 Training to farmers for skill upgradation 100000.00 L.S.

22 Assistance in marketting of village handicraft 100000.00 L.S.

23 Road Development & Approch Road 1000000.00 L.S.

24 Street Light 1000000.00 L.S.

25 Drainage System 500000.00 L.S.

26 Assistance to industries based on fly ash, such

as fly ash bricks etc. L.S.

27 Organisation of health camps 200000.00 L.S.

28 Establishment of Agricultural Farm Complex for alternative employment to farmers who wish to

remain in agriculture allied sector 1000000.00 L.S.

29 Adoption of 1 ITI for generation of skilled man

power 10000000.00 L.S.

5.7 Land Matters

5.7.1 Any displaced family will be eligible for getting land / plot of minimum size as

specified below on the basis of income or required plot, under this concept

displaced family will be eligible for getting plot much larger then the existing.

In rural area displaced families will get plots free of cost as given bellow:

Table: -5.2, Land Matters

S.No. Category Size of the Plot

1. Landless Family 300 sq.mtrs.

2. Small /Marginal Farmer‘s Family 450 sq.mtrs.

3. Other Farmer‘s Family 600 sq.mtrs

5.7.2 If any displaced family wants plot, larger in size than-what is given as per above

standard then by paying additional/ extra sum he may be given that plot on

the basis of its availability.



5.7.3 Procedure of determining price for -plots of all the families will be equal. If rate of the

new land plot is more than the rate of compensation given for land acquisition

then difference, in sum shall be given according to the directives of state

government.

5.7.4 One family would get one land plot.

5.7.5 Displaced families will be assisted for being beneficiary within prevailing

government plans for irrigation by well, bore or other means in

allotted land.

5.7.6 The Kotwar will be assisted to get allotment of plot & other facilities just like other

displaced people.

5.7.7 Displacees would be assisted to get loan for new building construction from HUDCO

or other financial agencies, if they need.

5.7.8 Those, displaced families whose commercial/ business place will be acquired will be

provided a place in new settlement by developing commercial / business land

tract there. In condition of resettlement a person who is only an occupant,

will be given abadi- land in new settlement moreover he will be given also

rehabilitation grant for that provided that he has been living there for at least

three year prior from the date of publication of the notification under section 4

or has been a legal tenant for at least one year.

5.7.9 Project affected families will be given priority in the allotment of commercial land /plot

shop in the project area.

5.7.10 All necessarily provision will be made for construction of religious place like Temple,

Mosque, Gurudwara, Church, funeral in new place, where displaces have to

be shifted.

5.7.11 Details of size Land to be allotted to each Khatedar in this specific project;



Table: 5.3, Details of size Land to be allotted to each Khatedar

S.No. Size of Land Category Mayapur Shankarpur Grand Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 Less Than 0.5 Hectare A 175 44 219

2 0.5 Hectare to 1 Hectare B 68 36 104

3 1 Hectare to 1.5 Hectare C 46 7 53

4 1.5 Hectare to 2 Hectare D 33 8 41

5 2 Hectare to 3 Hectare E 26 15 41

6 3 Hectare to 4 Hectare F 13 6 19

7 4 Hectare and above G 17 10 27

Grand Total 378 126 504


5.7.12 It has been ensured that minimum homestead is disturbed and the land of only

those Homestead will be displaced which is must for the Project. Details are

given in the following table no. ----

Table: 5.4, Size of Plot of Land to be allotted

S.No. Size of Plot Mayapur Shankarpur Grand Total

1 2 3 4 5

1 Up to 300 Sq mtrs 282 96 378

2 300 to 450 Sq mtrs 2 8 10

3 450 to 600 Sq mtrs 1 0 1

4 Above 600 Sq mtrs 2 1 3

Grand Total 287 105 392


5.7.13 The displaced families whose houses will be affected due to acquisition of land for

the Project will be resettled before taking possession of their land in which

their houses are built.



5.8 Employment and other facilities

5.8.1 Displaced family will be eligible, for employment (who has been land owner or lease

holder of acquired land undependably or jointly three year prior to the date of

publication-of Notification under section 4 of land acquisition act. A one

member of such displaced family will be provided employment as per their

eligibility and appropriateness.

5.8.2 At the time of providing employment at project work displaced family will be given

priority. The Priority of employment would be given in following order

(i) Whose 100% of agricultural land and house is acquired

(ii) Whose 100% of agricultural land is acquired

(iii) Whose more than 75% of agricultural land is acquired.

(iv) Whose more than 50% of agricultural land is acquired.

(v) Whose more than 25% of agricultural land is acquired.

(vi) Other displaced family.

5.8.3 The employment will be subject to his/her suitability as to Age verification, Medical

Fitness, Police verification of character & antecedents, Educational

qualifications, Training, Experience & skill required for the nature of job/ post.

5.9 Self Employment in Agriculture

5.9.1 Project affected people whose 75% or more land is acquired for the Project and are

otherwise eligible for employment, but are not interested in employment and

wish to take up agricultural activities else where would be given one time Cash

assistance of Rs.10000/- for development of land, and a one time Cash grant

of Rs.75000/-in lieu of employment.

5.9.2 Training to all eligible educated young people will be given to make them more

skilled for better employment in the project as per their educational

qualification.

5.9.3 Transit arrangement for displaced family working in the project will be made.



5.9.4 Such displaced family who have an alternative of self employment in transport

business whether it is related to the, carriage of product or passenger

transport they will be given priority in transport constructs of project, and to

serve the purpose assistance to get transport vehicle will be given to them.

5.10 Training

5.10.1 Those member of displaced families who are eligible for getting employment in

projects but do not possess any necessary/ required technical qualification,

then in that condition they will be trained as per their educational qualification.

5.10.2 Project affected other people specially land less people will be given to develop

new skills in them and they will be given employment in accordance to their

eligibility, skill and physical fitness. These will also be assisted to get

employment in project generated created by the State Government.

5.10.3 Displaced families will be trained for self employment rooted plans (development of

dairy, poultry, fisheries, short college industry etc.) in accordance to their

interest. They will also be assisted to get loan from the related financial

institutions for their self employment.

5.10.4 Educated youth who qualify for ITI admission in the District of Surguja will be

provided financial assistance by way of meeting the expenses of the course

fee by CMDC for first five years of issue of Notification for Land acquisition for

the Project. This facility can be extended, if necessary, with or without some

modification in the scheme.

5.10.5 Educated wards from displaced family who qualify for admission in Diploma in

Engineering in the state of Chhattisgarh will be provided financial assistance

by way of meeting course fee by CMDC for first five years of issue of

Notification for Land acquisition for the Project. This facility can be extended, if

necessary, with or without some modification in the scheme.



5.10.6 The villagers in the socio-economic survey also expressed their willingness to be

trained in differed skills so that they either are self-employed or can be

absorbed in other occupations. Several of these people will be trained in

activities such as basket making, small businesses, tailoring, etc. CMDC will

encourage self employment of the displaced families through training. CMDC

will arrange for training of interested persons for increasing their skills, through

government agencies like ITI or any other institution of Govt. of CG. The fields

selected for self employment during survey or as under:

(i) Dairy;

(ii) Poultry;

(iii) Mushroom Growing;

(iv) Medicinal Plants growing;

(v) Fruit Planting;

(vi) Vegetable Farming;

(vii) Floriculture;

(viii) Silviplasture (Resham keet Paalan);

(ix) Bee keeping;

(x) Achar,Jam,Jelly,Murabba,Paapar making;

(xi) Growing & precessing of spices;

(xii) Rope,Basket,Chatai making ;

(xiii) Bamboo crafting;

(xix) Wood crafting;

(xx) Agarbatti making;.

(xxi) Horticulture, etc.

5.10.7 Training in other areas will also be coordinated through the State Departments,

Government, wherein CMDC will provide financial assistance to the Project

Affected People required for the training.

5.10.8 Project Affected Persons shall also be provided training either in the CMDC ‗s

Training Centre or in any other organization in the technical field, wherever

necessary, to provide and develop their technical skill.



5.10.9 The project affected persons will be motivated to get benefit of various self

employment schemes being organized by various Departments of the

Government. The self employment or profession will be provided financial

assistance by bank or Government Agency or non-government organization.

These schemes will be implemented by the following

Departments/Agencies:-

Chhattisgarh Khadi Evam Gramodyog Board

Jila Panchayat / Janpad Panchayat or Gram Panchayat.

District Industry and Trade Center

Veterinary and Fisheries Department

Mahila Evam Bal Vikas Nigam

Horticulture and Social Forestry Department

Sericulture Department

5.10.10 Workshop/ training will be organized for the self help groups working in project

area to facilitate them in joining in the project activities as per their eligibility,

skill.

5.10.11 Following nature of jobs will be offered to Cooperative Societies of Project affected

persons:-

a) Lifting shifting & sorting of material, e.g.,

i) Lifting & shifting of other civil material;

ii) Small Plant construction material;

iii) Stores Material, etc.

iv) Lifting & shifting of Coal;

v) Lifting shifting & sorting at coal yard .

b) Horticulture jobs, e.g.

i) Plantation in mine & Township area;

ii) Maintenance of Plants in mine & Township area;

c) Minor Civil jobs, e.g.

i) Removal & shifting of loose earth;



ii) Construction of boundary wall, drains etc.

d) Manpower supply to large Contractors;

e) Clearing of sites in the Mine and Township area;

f) General cleaning in Plant & Township area;

g) Transportation of civil material for contractors;

5.11 Self Employment Opportunities:

Besides, lot of self-employment opportunities will be available to Project affected

Persons, as given below.

i). Supply of milk in Mines canteen & Township residents. ii). Supply of vegetables in Mines canteen & Township residents. iii). Supply of provisions to Mines Canteen & Township residents. iv). Supply of confectionary items, e.g. Bread, biscuits, eggs etc. to Mines Canteen & Township residents v). Hotel & Restaurant. vi). General merchant Shop. vii). Sweets Shop. viii). Flour mill. ix). Supply and transporting of sand x). Tailoring shop. xi). Operating of Taxies/Autos. xii). Small Workshop for repairing of machines parts. xiii). Herbal medicinal plants & Jetropha plantation. xiv) Poultry farming. xv).Mushroom farming. xvi).Basket & rope making.



xvii).Processing of medicinal & herbal plants, e.g. Alovera. xviii).Fruit growing. xix).Processing of Fruits, e.g. Jam, Jelly, Achar etc. xx).Plantation & marketing of Flowers. xxi).Supply of stationary items. xxii). Sheep, pigs, Bee keeping. xxiii).Sale & repair shop for electrical items. xxiv).Manufacturing of Bakery items. xxv). Supply of saplings for plantation. xxvi). Saplings of manures for plants & garden. xxvii). Auto Repair shop.

5.11.1 Any member of the displaced family is willing to establish industry of his own, then

they will be facilitated in land allotment in the adjacent/surrounding area as per

the project need for setting up an acilliary unit.

5.11.2 Displaced families will be provided medical facilities in project hospital and their

children will be provided facility while getting admission in project school on a nominal/

seasonal fee.

5.12 Details of the land identified for resettlement of the PAP

The land proposed for Resettlement Colony has been identified in Village ---------

Tahsil ---------------- District Surguja.The total land being acquired for the resettlement

colony ---------- Hectares of Private Land. Map of the proposed resettlement Colony is

attached.

It is ensured that;

1. No house is affected in the area of the Resettlement Colony.



2. No public building is affected due to acquisition of private land in the area of

Resettlement Colony.

3. The proposed resettlement Colony can accommodate all displaced families.

5.13 Main features of Resettlement Colony

Resettlement colony for Displaced families is being designed in such a way that

displaced families will get better living standard than what they are getting presently.

Following facilities like water, road, and electricity community development places / public

buildings will be provided as below: -

5.13.1 Road: As per the requiredment.

5.13.2 Drinking water:- One hand pump will be provided in a cluster of about 20 house for

the purpose of supply of drinking water/domestic water.

5.13.3 Electrification:- Electric Poles on each road and lanes and electric connection will

be provide to each plot/ house in the Resettlement Colony. Bill for consumption of Power

for streetlights will be borne by the village Panchayat, and the bill for individual

consumption of electricity for domestic use will be borne by the resident user.

5.13.4 Community Structures / Public Building. All types of essential community

structures / Public Buildings such as Primary School, Secondary School, Primary Health

Centre, Panchayat Bhawan and Play ground will be constructed. The community centre

will be handed over to the Village Panchayat/ Society of the residents of Resettlement

Colony.

5.13.5 It is proposed to name this Resettlement Colony as ‗ New Shankarpur.‘



5.14 Monitoring Committees

Following Committees shall monitor Resettlement of displaced families.

a) State level Resettlement Committee.

1. Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh state Chairman 2. Leader of Opposition Party of CG State Assembly Member 3. Minister In charge of Ministry of Finance Member 4. Minister In charge of Ministry of resettlement Member 5. Minister In charge of Revenue Department Member 6. Minister In charge of Ministry of Law Member 7. Minister of Mineral Resources Member 8. Zila Panchayat Adhyaksh of Distt. Suguja Member 9. Member of Parliament/ Assembly Affected Area – Nominated by the Govt. of C.G. Member(s) 10. Chief Secretary, Govt. of C.G. Member 11. Secretary of Mineral Resources Deptt. Member 12. Managing Director of CMDC Special Invitee 13. Resettlement Commissioner of the state of C.G. Member Secretary

b) District level Resettlement Committee shall have following members.

1. Minister In charge of District Surguja Chairman 2. Zila Panchayat Adhyaksh Member 3. Member of Parliament/ Assembly Affected area – Nominated by the Govt. of CG. Member(s) 4. Sarpanch (s) of affected Villages where Ressettle is to be done Member(s) 5. District Mining Officer and In charge of Mining



of Distt. Surguja. Member(s) 6. Managing Director, CMDC Special Invitee 7. District Collector, Surguja district Member Secretary.

5.15 Redressal of Grievances: Grievance Redressal is an important component as it

ensures that R&R benefits reaches to the affected population. The R&R

committee would ensure that all the grievances of the PAPs are suitably

redressed. An effort will be made that all petty grievances are sorted there itself

when the grievance is submitted. Complicated grievances where other agencies

are involved, in that case the issue will be attempted to be sorted out in three

months by coordinating with proper agency.

Following mechanism is set up for redressal of grievances relating to

Rehabilitation & Resettlement of project-affected people.

1. Any dispute regarding Land ownership, area of Land, Type of Land etc.

Shall be settled by the Land Acquisition Officer/District Administration.

2. Any dispute regarding number of trees, type & size of trees, valuation of

trees in the land which is acquired for the Project shall be decided by the

Land Acquisition Officer in consultation with Tehsildar and concerned

departments i.e. Horticulture/Agriculture/Forest.

3. Valuation of House, well, Bari etc. will be decided by the Land Acquisition

Officer in consultation of Govt. approved Valuer or committee comprising

of technical experts.

4. Any grievance regarding eligibility of allotment of residential plots to

those families whose houses are acquired for the Project, facilities in the

Resettlement Colony will be monitored by the State level and District

level Committee. An Officer nominated by the MD CMDC, shall also be

associated in the monitoring Committee(s) for co-ordination of

resettlement of displaced families whose homestead is acquired for the

Project. In case of any capital expenditure, the nominated Officer shall

put up proposal for approval of MD through GM (Coal).



5. The Head of the Grievance Committee shall coordinate with State level

monitoring Committee, and the Member Secretary shall coordinate with

the District level monitoring Committee and Government agencies

regarding redressal of grievances and matters relating to Rehabilitation &

Resettlement of displaced persons/ families.

6. The Grievance Committee shall keep abreast the Managing Director

regarding grievances and their redressal every fortnightly

7. An officer shall be nominated by managing director for redressal of

grievances regarding Rehabilitation (i.e. employment /alternate job/

training etc.).

8. A Grievance Committee of CMDC consisting of following officers shall be

constituted by the Managing Director for monitoring redressal of

grievances.

a). GM Coal - Head of the Committee

b). Accounts Officer - Member

c). Civil Engineer/ Survey Officer - Member

d). Officer incharge of Ambikapur office - Member Secretary.

The committee will initially meet weekly to sort out petty grievances, and wherever

necessary will take approval of MD.

5.16 Implementation Schedule / Execution time frame:

A time schedule for the implementation of R&R activities has been taken as 3 years

from the date of approval R&R plan from Govt. of C.G. The R&R activities will be

correlated with the mining activities. The R&R implementation will be done in single phase

/4 phases as per the project requirement. Two complete villages viz., Shankarpur and

Mayapur need to be relocated.



CHAPTER – 6 BENEFITS AND REHABILITATION COST



CHAPTER VI

BENEFITS AND REHABILITATION COST

The nation is suffering from the shortage of power. The Chhattisgarh State has rich

resources to meet this shortage of power up to some extent. The coal is major requiremet

for the generation of Thermal Power. The project is destined to harness the coal for

different uses in leisure and progress of the mankind. This will indirectly boost to the

energy sector and to economy of the India ultimately.

6.1 Direct Benefit from the Project:

Investment exceeding Rs 1600 crore shall be made by CMDC or its MDO

(Mine Developer cum Operator) and about Rs. 4500 Crore will be invested

by ICPL for putting a power plant in village Prem Nagar District Surguja in

the State of Chhattisgarh. This investment will raise the income of common

man residing in the near by villages and area.

Benefit from Revenue collection to State Exchequer through Royalty on coal,

taxes and duties, which would be approximately exceeding Rs. 100 cr. per

annum.

Revenue to CSEB: CSEB would be access to power at minimum cost, an

opportunity for enhancement in its revenue which is an added advantage to

Chhattisgarh Government.

Host of economic activities viz. transportation, hotel, banking, hospital,

education, construction industry and business, development of allied

industries etc. would be a great boom for Surguja Distt.

Agriculture and Horticulture: Largest scale plantation will be done by CMDC

around the periphery of dumps and mine.

Employment Generation through Vocational Training to Un-employed youth

and eligible persons would be imparted for self-employment.



General Development: Activities focused for socio-economic development of

the rural family including education, health & hygiene are part of the project.

Eco friendly Mining Techniques will impart least impact on the environment.

6.2 Indirect Benefit from the Project:

Requirement of manpower for construction is expected to increase

progressively to approximately 5000 after reaching to its rated production

capacity and decline as the construction activity comes to an end.

Average employment over the 5-year period of development of mine will

be 2000.

This will be ensured that, project affected people will be the major

beneficiaries of increased economic activity and employment. This would

be done through training to improve their employability and through

promotion of self-employment and development of entrepreneurship.

Employment and increased income will in turn lead to a better quality of

life and further enhanced opportunities to participate in the new economic

opportunities created by opening and operating the 6 million tonnes coal

mine.

6.3 REHABILITATION COST

Rehabilitaion is a very painfull activity but essential for the nation‘s progress and

improvement in the life style of the existing population over any project area. The CMDC

will take care of all the, guidelines, principles, rules, regulations and acts laid by the state

or central government for proper rehabilitiation of project affected people.

Village wise activity and financial projection for rehabilitation of project affected

families/persons are tabulated below inference to above chapters. The cost calculation is

based on the rehabilitation scheme inforced by Naya Raipur Development Authority under

the aeiges of Housing and Environement Department Governemnt of Chhattisgarh.



6.3.1 VILLAGE MAYAPUR

Table: - 5.1, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Mayapur

S.N. Item/Details of works Village - Mayapur

Rate in Rs. Unit Quantity Amount in Rs. Remarks

1 Cost of Agriculture

Land as per the Revenue Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 419.26 576482500 Total Private Area to be acquired

2 Cost of Badi Land as

per the Revenue Autorities

825000.00 / Ha. 2.22 1831500 Total Private Area to be acquired

3 Cost of Govt Revenue

land as per the Revenue Autorities

3.1 Chhote jhad ka jungle 920000.00 / Ha. 97.18 89405600

3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 15.86 7295600


4.1 Tubewell

4.1.1 Deep 200 Feet 29100.00 /

Tubewell 6 174600

4.1.2 Deep 250 Feet 35475.00 /

Tubewell 4 141900

4.1.3 Deep 300 Feet 41975.00 /

Tubewell 2 83950

4.2 Well

4.2.1 10 Feet Dia & 35 Feet

Deep :(Kachcha) 30000.00 / Well 4 120000


Deep :(Pucca) 45000.00 / Well 2 90000


Deep: (Kachcha) 35000.00 / Well 2 70000


Deep: (Pucca) 50000.00 / Well 1 50000

5 Green Barrier

Development Around of village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6 Cost on employment of

1 member of each project affected family

287

There are total 287 project

affected families

6.1

Skilled 2% of Total Project affected

Families = 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

7500 /person /year

6 45000

Recuring Cost 6.2

Semi-skilled 10% of Total Project affected Families = 21@Rs.

5000/-month

5000 /person /year

29 145000

6.3

unskilled 88 % of Total Project affected

Families = 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person /year

252 756000

7

If employment is not provided, then 1 shop at the cost of company

or maximum Rs.100000/- for agricultural land

development at another

100000 /person 287 28700000 One time cost





place or Rs. 100000/- cash.

8

Technical training to eligible candidates i.e. 5% of PA families = 14

persons

50000 /person 14 700000

9 Compensation for

houses

9.1 Kachcha Houses: 200 /Sq. Ft. 239570 47914000

9.2 Pucca Houses: 367 /Sq. Ft. 0 0

9.3 Aahata Nirman:

(Kachcha) 700 /meter 1290 903000

9.4 Aahata Nirman:

(Pucca) 1300 /meter 150 195000

9.5 Fencing work : 139 /Number 3 417

9.6 Barbed Wire: 6 /meter 960 5760

9.7 Baramda : (Kachcha) 70 /Sq. Ft. 38700 2709000

9.8 Baramda : (Pucca) 128 /Sq. Ft. 4350 556800

10 Grant for construction

of house 100000 /family 287 28700000

11 Grant for animal shade 10000 /family 216 2160000

12 Rehabilitiation

assistance 11000 /family 287 3157000

13 Transportation charges

on material/luggage 1000 /family 287 287000

14 Cost of trees on private

land 1000 /tree 6570 6570000

15

Capacity enhancement training to 1 member of each project affected

families.

20000 /family 287 5740000

16

Upgradation of existing schools and its

moderate furnishing, situated in nearby

project area

16.1 Primary Schools 500000 /school 2 1000000

16.2 Middle Sachool 1000000 /school 1 1000000

16.3 Mahila Mandal 1000000

2 2000000

16.4 Angan badi 75000

3 225000

16.5 Temple 100000

1 100000

16.6 Bhajan Mandli/ Kirtan

Bhawan 75000

0 0

17 Incentive to meritorious students ; awards etc.

10000 L.S.

10000

18

Assistance to handicaped, widow and

old aged people in project affected villages

100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for women empowerment

in project affected villages through SHG

groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20 Expenditure on developemnt of

agriculture in project 500000 L.S.

500000





affected villages through introduction of

new or innovative technologies, drip

irrigation etc.

21 Training to farmers for

skill upgradation 100000 L.S.

100000

22 Assistance in

marketting of village handicraft

100000 L.S.

100000

23 Road Development &

Approch Road 1000000 L.S.

20000000

24 Street Light 1000000 L.S.

100000

25 Drainage System 500000 L.S.

500000

26 Assistance to industries based on fly ash, such as fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.

27 Organisation of health

camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of Agricultural Farm

Complex for alternative employment to farmers who wish to remain in

agriculture allied sector

1000000 L.S.

1000000

29 Adoption of 1 ITI for generation of skilled

man power

L.S.

Net Total

922024627



Chart 6.1, Mayapur Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph explains about the cost on rehabilitation of Mayapur village. The

Maximum Expenditure is on the purchase of land i.e, Rs. 6,750.15 lacs as compare to the

expenditure on Employment, Development and Compensation for house and

infrastructures.

Chart 6.2, Mayapur Rehabilitation Expenditure in %

The above Pie-Chart shows expenditure on Mayapur Rehabilitation in terms of

%.The Major portion will go on Purchase of land, i.e. 73%, next to it on Development &

Environement i.e. 10%, on Employment – 4% and on bulk infrastructure – 3% only. The

expenditure on other sector is very less.

213.30 24.00

931.58 900.00

27.35371.86

2.00

6,750.15

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Mayapur Rehabilitaion Expenditure

Bulk Infra.3%

Commu. develp.0%

Comp. for Hou. & Infrast.10%Develp. & Envor.

10%Education0%

Employeement 4%

Health0%

Purchase of Land73%

Mayapur Rehabilitation Expenditure



6.3.2 VILLAGE SHANKARPUR

Table: - 5.2, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Shankarpur

S.N. Item/Details of works Village - Shankarpur


1

Cost of Agriculture Land

as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 171.41 235688750

Total

Private

Area to be

acquired

2 Cost of Badi Land as per

the Revenue Autorities 825000.00 / Ha. 1.48 1221000

Total

Private

Area to be

acquired

3

Cost of Govt Revenue

land as per the Revenue

Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 13.34 6136400


4.1 Tubewell

4.1.1 Deep 200 Feet 29100.00 / Tubewell 4 116400



4.2 Well




Deep :(Pucca) 45000.00 / Well 2 90000




Deep: (Pucca) 50000.00 / Well 3 150000

5

Green Barrier

Development Around of

village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6 Cost on employment of 1

member of each project 105

There are

total 105





affected family project

affected

families

6.1

Skilled 2% of Total

Project affected Families

= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

7500 /person

/year 2 15000

Recuring

Cost 6.2

Semi-skilled 10% of

Total Project affected

Families = 21@Rs.

5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 11 55000

6.3

unskilled 88 % of Total


= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 92 276000

7

If employment is not

provided, then 1 shop at

the cost of company or

maximum Rs.100000/-

for agricultural land


place or Rs. 100000/-

cash.

100000 /person 433 43300000 One time

cost

8

Technical training to

eligible candidates i.e.

5% of PA families = 14

persons

50000 /person 22 1100000

9 Compensation for

houses



9.3 Aahata Nirman:

(Kachcha) 700 /meter 480 336000

9.4 Aahata Nirman: (Pucca) 1300 /meter 50 65000





10 Grant for construction of

house 100000 /family 433 43300000






12 Rehabilitiation





land 1000 /tree 4365 4365000

15

Capacity enhancement

training to 1 member of

each project affected

families.

20000 /family 433 8660000

16

Upgradation of existing

schools and its moderate

furnishing, situated in

nearby project area




0


2 150000

16.5 Temple 100000

1 100000


Bhawan 75000

1 75000

17 Incentive to meritorious

students ; awards etc. 10000 L.S.

10000

18

Assistance to

handicaped, widow and

old aged people in

project affected villages

100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for

women empowerment in


through SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of

agriculture in project

affected villages through

introduction of new or

innovative technologies,

500000 L.S.

500000





drip irrigation etc.



100000

22 Assistance in marketting

of village handicraft 100000 L.S.

100000



20000000


100000


500000

26

Assistance to industries

based on fly ash, such

as fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm

Complex for alternative

employment to farmers

who wish to remain in


1000000 L.S.

1000000

29

Adoption of 1 ITI for

generation of skilled man

power

L.S.

Net Total

539120364



Chart 6.3, Shankarpur Rehabilitation Expenditure

The Maximum Expenditure is proposed on the purchase of land i.e, Rs. 2,759.09

lacs.

Chart 6.4, Shankarur Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Pie-Chart Explain about the Shankarpur cost on rehabilitation in terms of

%. It is 51% on Purchase of land, Development –17%, Employment –10%, Compensation

for house and infrastructure – 18% and 4% on bulk infrastructure.

215.674.75

943.04 900.00

21.60

545.06

2.00

2,759.09

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Shankarpur Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.4%

Commu. develp.0%

Comp. for Hou. & Infrast.18%

Develp. & Envor.17%

Education0%

Employeement 10%

Health0%

Purchase of Land51%

Shankarpur Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.3, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Bojha

S.N. Item/Details of works Village - Bojha


1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 431.65 593518750

Total Private

Area to be

acquired

2

Cost of Badi Land as

per the Revenue

Autorities

825000.00 / Ha. 0 0

Total Private

Area to be

acquired

3


land as per the

Revenue Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 49.75 22885000


4.1 Tubewell

4.1.1 Deep 200 Feet 29100.00 /

Tubewell

4.1.2 Deep 250 Feet 35475.00 /

Tubewell

4.1.3 Deep 300 Feet 41975.00 /

Tubewell

4.2 Well


Deep :(Kachcha) 30000.00 / Well


Deep :(Pucca) 45000.00 / Well


Deep: (Kachcha) 35000.00 / Well


Deep: (Pucca) 50000.00 / Well

5

Green Barrier

Development Around

of village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6

Cost on employment of

1 member of each

project affected family

202

There are

total 202

project

affected

families





6.1

Skilled 2% of Total

Project affected

Families = 4 @Rs.

7500/-month

7500 /person

/year 4 30000

Recuring

Cost 6.2

Semi-skilled 10% of


Families = 21@Rs.

5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 20 100000

6.3


Project affected

Families = 187@Rs.

3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 178 534000

7




maximum Rs.100000/-




cash.

100000 /person 202 20200000 One time

cost

8




persons

50000 /person 10 500000

9 Compensation for

houses



9.3 Aahata Nirman:

(Kachcha) 700 /meter

9.4 Aahata Nirman: (Pucca) 1300 /meter

9.5 Fencing work : 139 /Number

9.6 Barbed Wire: 6 /meter

9.7 Baramda : (Kachcha) 70 /Sq. Ft.

9.8 Baramda : (Pucca) 128 /Sq. Ft.


house 100000 /family 0 0






12 Rehabilitiation





land 1000 /tree 9045 9045000

15




families.

20000 /family 0 0

16


schools and its

moderate furnishing,

situated in nearby

project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000



10000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in


100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for

women empowerment

in project affected

villages through SHG

groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of




500000 L.S.

500000









100000



100000



20000000


100000


500000

26




L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S.

1000000

29


generation of skilled

man power

L.S.

Net Total

849333150



Chart 6.5, Bojha Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph explains about the rehabilitation cost for Bojha village. The

Maximum is on the purchase of land i.e, Rs. 7,062.14 lacs. Status of other sector can be

ajudged from the bar chart.

Chart 6.6, Bojha Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Pie-Chart shows about the Rehabilitation expenditure for Bojha village in

terms of %. Maximum is on Purchase of land- i.e. 83%, Development –11%, Employment

–3%, Compensation for house and infrastructure –1% and on bulk infrastructure –2%.

206.00 3.00 90.45

900.00

5.10 224.64 2.00

7,062.14

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Bojha Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.2%

Commu. develp.0%

Comp. for Hou. & Infrast.

1%Develp. & Envor.

11%Education

0%

Employeement 3%

Health0%

Purchase of Land83%

Bojha Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.4, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Songara

S.N. Item/Details of works

Village - Songara

Rate in Rs. Unit Quantity Amount in

Rs. Remarks

1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 638 877250000

Total Private

Area to be

acquired


the Revenue Autorities 825000.00 / Ha. 0 0

Total Private

Area to be

acquired

3



Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 44.71 20566600


4.1 Tubewell




4.2 Well









5

Green Barrier


village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6

Cost on employment of 1

member of each project

affected family

340

There are

total 340

project

affected

families

6.1 Skilled 2% of Total

Project affected Families 7500

/person

/year 7 52500

Recuring

Cost




Village - Songara


Rs. Remarks

= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

6.2

Semi-skilled 10% of Total


= 21@Rs. 5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 34 170000

6.3



= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 299 897000

7




maximum Rs.100000/-




cash.

100000 /person 340 34000000 One time

cost

8




persons

50000 /person 17 850000

9 Compensation for

houses



9.3 Aahata Nirman:










12 Rehabilitiation assistance 11000 /family 0 0






Village - Songara


Rs. Remarks


land 1000 /tree 4560 4560000

15




families.

20000 /family 340 6800000

16




nearby project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000



10000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in


100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for



through SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of






500000 L.S.

500000



100000

22 Assistance in marketting 100000 L.S.

100000




Village - Songara


Rs. Remarks

of village handicraft



20000000


100000


500000

26


based on fly ash, such as

fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S.

1000000

29



power

L.S.

Net Total

1192571700



Chart 6.7, Songarar Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph make clear about the Rehabilitation Cost on Songara. The

Maximum Expenditure is proposed for purchase of land i.e, Rs. 10325.322 lacs.

Chart 6.8, Songara Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Pie-Chart displays Rehabilitation expenditure in terms of %. It is 87% on

Purchase of land, Development –7%, Employment –4% and on bulk infrastructure –2%.

206 3 45.6900

5.1 438.695 2

10325.322

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Songara Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.2%

Commu. develp.0%


0%

Develp. & Envor.7%

Education0%

Employeement 4%

Health0%

Purchase of Land87%

Songara Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.5, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Mohanpur


Village - Mohanpur


Rs. Remarks

1 Cost of Agriculture Land

as per the Revenue Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 181.13 249053750

Total Private

Area to be acquired

2 Cost of Badi Land as per the Revenue Autorities

825000.00 / Ha. 0 0

Total Private

Area to be acquired

3 Cost of Govt Revenue

land as per the Revenue Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 17.34 7976400


4.1 Tubewell




4.2 Well









5 Green Barrier

Development Around of village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6 Cost on employment of 1 member of each project

affected family

132

There are total 132 project

affected families


Project affected Families = 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

7500 /person /year

3 22500

Recuring Cost

6.2 Semi-skilled 10% of Total Project affected Families = 21@Rs. 5000/-month

5000 /person /year

13 65000

6.3 unskilled 88 % of Total

Project affected Families = 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person /year

116 348000

7

If employment is not provided, then 1 shop at the cost of company or

maximum Rs.100000/- for agricultural land

development at another place or Rs. 100000/-

cash.

100000 /person 132 13200000 One time

cost




Village - Mohanpur


Rs. Remarks

8

Technical training to eligible candidates i.e. 5% of PA families = 14

persons

50000 /person 7 350000




9.3 Aahata Nirman:














land 1000 /tree 6105 6105000

15

Capacity enhancement training to 1 member of each project affected

families.

20000 /family 132 2640000

16

Upgradation of existing schools and its moderate

furnishing, situated in nearby project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000

17 Incentive to meritorious students ; awards etc.

10000 L.S.

10000

18

Assistance to handicaped, widow and

old aged people in project affected villages

100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for women empowerment in project affected villages

through SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on developemnt of

agriculture in project affected villages through

introduction of new or innovative technologies,


500000 L.S.

500000

21 Training to farmers for 100000 L.S.

100000




Village - Mohanpur


Rs. Remarks

skill upgradation



100000



20000000


100000


500000

26 Assistance to industries

based on fly ash, such as fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of Agricultural Farm

Complex for alternative employment to farmers who wish to remain in


1000000 L.S.

1000000

29 Adoption of 1 ITI for

generation of skilled man power

L.S.

Net Total

414826650



Chart 6.8, Mohanpur Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph gives a view on Rehabilitation expenditure of Mohanpur. The

Maximum amount is kept for purchase of land i.e, Rs. 2,793.86 lacs. The other sector

details can be seen in the graph.

Chart 6.9, Mohanpur Rehabilitation Expenditure in %

The above Pie-Chart elucidate on Rehabilitation cost on Mohanpur village in terms

of %. The break up of the expenditure proposed are Purchase of land-67%, Development

206.003.00 61.05

900.00

5.10177.26

2.00

2,793.86

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Mohanpur Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.5%

Commu. develp.0%Comp. for Hou. &

Infrast.2%

Develp. & Envor.22%

Education0%

Employeement 4%

Health0%

Purchase of Land67%

Mohanpur Rehabilitation Expenditure



–22%, Employment –4%, Compensation for house and infrastructure –2% and bulk

infrastructure –5%.

Table: - 6.6, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Sakalpur


Village - Sakalpur


Rs. Remarks

1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 0.84 1155000

Total

Private Area

to be

acquired



Total

Private Area

to be

acquired

3



Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 0.19 87400


4.1 Tubewell




4.2 Well









5

Green Barrier


village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6 Cost on employment of 1

member of each project 3

There are

total 3




Village - Sakalpur


Rs. Remarks

affected family project

affected

families

6.1

Skilled 2% of Total


= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

7500 /person

/year 0 0

Recuring

Cost 6.2



= 21@Rs. 5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 0 0

6.3



= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 3 9000

7




maximum Rs.100000/- for

agricultural land



cash.

100000 /person 3 300000 One time

cost

8


eligible candidates i.e. 5%

of PA families = 14

persons

50000 /person 1 50000




9.3 Aahata Nirman:












Village - Sakalpur


Rs. Remarks






land 1000 /tree 8760 8760000

15




families.

20000 /family 3 60000

16




nearby project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000



10000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in project

affected villages

100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for women

empowerment in project


SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of





500000 L.S.

500000




Village - Sakalpur


Rs. Remarks




100000



100000



20000000


100000


500000

26



fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S.

1000000

29



power

L.S.

Net Total

123490200



Chart 6.10, SakalpurRehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph explains about the Sakalpur Rehabilitation expenditure in

lacs.The Maximum Expenditure allocated for is for Development i.e, Rs. 900 lacs.

Chart 6.11, Sakalpur Rehabilitation Expenditure in %

The above Pie-Chart describes on Rehabilitation expenditure in terms of % for the

village Sakalpur. The major allocation is for Development –73%, Purchase of land-1%,

Employment –1%, Compensation for house and infrastructure –7% and on bulk

infrastructure –17%.

206.00

3.0087.60

900.00

5.10 15.19 2.00 16.01

0100200

300400500600

700800900

1,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Sakalpur Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.17%Commu. develp.

0%


7%

Develp. & Envor.73%

Education1%

Employeement 1%

Health0%

Purchase of Land1%

Sakalpur Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.7, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Tulsi


Village - Tulsi


Rs. Remarks

1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 3.44 4730000

Total Private

Area to be

acquired



Total Private

Area to be

acquired

3



Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 1.27 584200


4.1 Tubewell




4.2 Well









5

Green Barrier


village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6



affected family

6

There are

total 6 project

affected

families



/person

/year 0 0 Recuring Cost




Village - Tulsi


Rs. Remarks

= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

6.2



= 21@Rs. 5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 1 5000

6.3



= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 5 15000

7




maximum Rs.100000/-




cash.


8




persons

50000 /person 1 50000

9 Compensation for

houses



9.3 Aahata Nirman:
















Village - Tulsi


Rs. Remarks


land 1000 /tree 10965 10965000

15




families.

20000 /family 6 120000

16




nearby project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000



10000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in


100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for



through SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of






500000 L.S.

500000



100000




Village - Tulsi


Rs. Remarks



100000



20000000


100000


500000

26



fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S.

1000000

29



power

L.S.

Net Total

133514400



Chart 6.12, Tulsi Rehabilitation Expenditure

The Maximum Expenditure is proposed for development and environment i.e. Rs.

900 lacs. Other comparative details can be seen on the bar chart.

Chart 6.13, Tulsi Rehabilitation Expenditure in %

The above Pie-Chart Explain percent wise allocation of funds for the Rehbilitaion of

project affected villagers residing at Tulsi village. Break up of allocation is purchase of

land-7%, Development –67%, Employment –2%, Compensation for house and

infrastructure –8% and on bulk infrastructure –16%.

206

3

109.65

900

5.1 18.9 290.494

0100

200300400

500600700800

9001,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Tulsi Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.16%

Commu. develp.0%


8%

Develp. & Envor.67%

Education0%

Employeement 2%

Health0%

Purchase of Land7%

Tulsi Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.8, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Dharampur


Village - Dharampur


Rs. Remarks

1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 131.71 181101250

Total Private

Area to be

acquired



Total Private

Area to be

acquired

3



Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 6.52 2999200


4.1 Tubewell




4.2 Well









5

Green Barrier


village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6



affected family

145

There are

total 145

project

affected

families



/person

/year 3 22500 Recuring Cost




Village - Dharampur


Rs. Remarks

= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

6.2



= 21@Rs. 5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 15 75000

6.3



= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 127 381000

7




maximum Rs.100000/-




cash.


8




persons

50000 /person 7 350000

9 Compensation for

houses



9.3 Aahata Nirman:
















Village - Dharampur


Rs. Remarks


land 1000 /tree 8160 8160000

15




families.

20000 /family 145 2900000

16




nearby project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000



10000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in


100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for



through SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of






500000 L.S.

500000



100000




Village - Dharampur


Rs. Remarks



100000



20000000


100000


500000

26



fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S.

1000000

29



power

L.S.

Net Total

359860950



Chart 6.14, Dharmpur Rehabilitation Expenditure

The Maximum Expenditure is allocated for Purchase of land i.e, Rs. 2207.6245

lacs. Other sector wise details are comparatively shown in above bar chart.

Chart 6.15, Dharampur Rehabilitation Expenditure in %

The above Pie-Chart Explains on proposed Dharampur Rehabilitation expenditure

in terms of %. Maximum apportion is for Purchase of land-61%, Development –25%,

Employment –6%, Compensation for house and infrastructure –2% and bulk infrastructure

–6%.

2063 81.6

900

5.1193.285

2

2207.6245

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Dharampur Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.6%

Commu. develp.0%


2%

Develp. & Envor.25%

Education0%

Employeement 6%

Health0%

Purchase of Land61%

Dharampur Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.8, Rehabilitation Cost, Village Kotya


Village - Kotya


Rs. Remarks

1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 29.38 40397500

Total Private

Area to be

acquired



Total Private

Area to be

acquired

3



Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 0.41 188600


4.1 Tubewell




4.2 Well









5

Green Barrier


village

1800000.00 /Ha. 50 90000000

6



affected family

274

There are

total 274

project

affected

families

6.1 Skilled 2% of Total 7500 /person 5 37500 Recuring




Village - Kotya


Rs. Remarks


= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

/year Cost

6.2



= 21@Rs. 5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 27 135000

6.3



= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 242 726000

7




maximum Rs.100000/-




cash.


8




persons

50000 /person 14 700000




9.3 Aahata Nirman:
















Village - Kotya


Rs. Remarks


land 1000 /tree 14340 14340000

15




families.

20000 /family 274 5480000

16




nearby project area





16.5 Temple 100000


Bhawan 75000



10000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in


100000 L.S.

100000

19

Revolving fund for



through SHG groups

100000 L.S.

100000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of






500000 L.S.

500000



100000




Village - Kotya


Rs. Remarks



100000



20000000


100000


500000

26



fly ash bricks etc.

L.S.


camps 200000 L.S.

200000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S.

1000000

29



power

L.S.

Net Total

222741000



Chart 6.16, Kotaya Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph displays about comparative Rehabilitation expenditure on Kotaya

village. The Maximum Expenditure is allocated for Development i.e, Rs. 900 lacs and

subquentaly for Employment, Purchase of land, Bulk infrastructure, Compensation for

house and infrastructures etc.

Chart 6.17, Kotaya Rehabilitation Expenditure in %

The above Pie-Chart Explains about the Kotaya Rehabilitation expenditure in terms

of %. Break up of the same is Purchase of land-28%, Development –40%, Employment –

16%, Compensation for house and infrastructure –7% and on bulk infrastructure –9%.

206

3

143.4

900

5.1

355.785

2

612.125

0

100200300400

500600700

800900

1,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

Kotaya Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.9%

Commu. develp.0%


7%

Develp. & Envor.40%

Education0%

Employeement 16%

Health0%

Purchase of Land28%

Kotaya Rehabilitation Expenditure



Table: - 6.9 Rehabilitation Cost, All Villages Total


All Villages Total


Rs. Remarks

1


as per the Revenue

Authorities

1375000.00 / Ha. 2006.82 2759377500

Total Private

Area to be

acquired


the Revenue Autorities 825000.00 / Ha. 3.7 3052500

Total Private

Area to be

acquired

3



Autorities


3.2 Other land 460000.00 / Ha. 149.39 68719400


4.1 Tubewell

4.1.1 Deep 200 Feet 29100.00 /

Tubewell 10 291000

4.1.2 Deep 250 Feet 35475.00 /

Tubewell 7 248325

4.1.3 Deep 300 Feet 41975.00 /

Tubewell 4 167900

4.2 Well




Deep :(Pucca) 45000.00 / Well 4 180000




Deep: (Pucca) 50000.00 / Well 4 200000

5

Green Barrier

Development Around

of village

1800000.00 /Ha. 450 810000000

6

Cost on employment of

1 member of each

project affected family

1494

There are

total 1494

project

affected

families




All Villages Total


Rs. Remarks

6.1

Skilled 2% of Total


= 4 @Rs. 7500/-month

7500 /person

/year 30 225000

Recuring

Cost 6.2

Semi-skilled 10% of


Families = 21@Rs.

5000/-month

5000 /person

/year 150 750000

6.3



= 187@Rs. 3000/-month

3000 /person

/year 1314 3942000

7




maximum Rs.100000/-




cash.


8




persons

50000 /person 93 4650000

9 Compensation for

houses



9.3 Aahata Nirman:

(Kachcha) 700 /meter 1770 1239000

9.4 Aahata Nirman: (Pucca) 1300 /meter 200 260000






house 100000 /family 720 72000000





All Villages Total


Rs. Remarks

12 Rehabilitiation





land 1000 /tree 72870 72870000

15




families.

20000 /family 1620 32400000

16


schools and its

moderate furnishing,

situated in nearby

project area




2 2000000


5 375000

16.5 Temple 100000

2 200000


Bhawan 75000

1 75000


students ; awards etc. 10000 L.S. 0 90000

18

Assistance to


old aged people in


100000 L.S. 0 900000

19

Revolving fund for



through SHG groups

100000 L.S. 0 900000

20

Expenditure on

developemnt of




500000 L.S. 0 4500000




All Villages Total


Rs. Remarks




skill upgradation 100000 L.S. 0 900000


of village handicraft 100000 L.S. 0 900000


Approch Road 1000000 L.S. 0 9000000

24 Street Light 1000000 L.S. 0 9000000

25 Drainage System 500000 L.S. 0 4500000

26




L.S. 0 2000000


camps 200000 L.S. 0 1800000

28

Establishment of

Agricultural Farm





1000000 L.S. 0 9000000

29


generation of skilled

man power

L.S. 0 10000000

Net Total

0 4606583041



Chart 6.18, All Villages Rehabilitation Expenditure

The above Graph displays comparative picture of Cost on Rehabilitation of Project

affected families. Maximum amount is kept for Purchase of land i.e, Rs. 32616.81 lacs.

The expenditure proposed for Development and environment is second to land purchase

head i.e. Rs. 8100 lacs. The cost allocated for Compensation for Houses and

Infrastructres and Employment is considerable i.e. Rs. 2493.97 lacs and 2360.67 lacs

respectively. Other sectoral budget allocation can be seen in the Bar Chart.

Chart 6.19, All Villages Rehabilitation Expenditure in%

The above Pie-Chart Explains about the cost on Rehabilitation of Project Affected

Families in terms of %. Comparative status can be adjudged through the above pie chart.

241.97 49.752493.97

8100.00

184.652360.67

18.00

32616.81

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Am

ou

nt

in L

acs

Type of Expenditure

All Villages Rehabilitation Expenditure

Bulk Infra.1%

Commu. develp.0%Comp. for Hou. &

Infrast.5%

Develp. & Envor.18%

Education0%

Employeement 5%

Health0%

Purchase of Land71%

All Villages Rehabilitation Expenditure



Total Rehabilitaion cost: Rs. 460.65 crores

(Rs. Four Hundred Sixty Crores and Sixty Five Lacs Only)

Note: 1. The Rehabilitaion Plan and Scheme is based on ―An Ideal Rehabilitaion

Policy 2007 of State of Chhattisgarh (As amended)‖. The effort is taken to

provide better compensation/facilities better than the state government

policy, but in case of dispute the provision made/ given in ―An Ideal

Rehabilitaion Policy 2007 of State of Chhattisgarh (As amended)‖ would

prevail.

2. The details of Project Affected People with their profession & nature of

groups etc. is attached as;

Annexure - ‘A’

3. The List of families whose House is being displaced is is attached as;

Annexure-‘B’

4. Details of Land coming within the project area as per Revenue Record is

attached as;

Annexure-‘C’

4. R&R Plan shall be implemented as per guidelines of Govt. of

Chhattisgarh‘s: Model Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy ―An Ideal

Rehabilitaion Policy 2007 of State of Chhattisgarh (As amended)‖. is

attached as;

Annexure-‘D’

chhattisgarh mineral development …lncindia.com/s/rr plan/shankarpur bhatgaon mines.pdfchhattisgarh...

Documents