chesapeake bay and new york state water quality and the potential for future regulations presented...
TRANSCRIPT
Chesapeake Bay and
New York State
Water Quality and the
Potential for Future Regulations
Presented by the
Upper Susquehanna Coalition
The Topic of Discussion
New York is going to be involved with helping improve the water quality of the Chesapeake Bay.
Today”s presentation will try to explain some of the background on this issue and some of the potential ramifications.
• Coalition of 14 Counties in NY and PA formed in 1992 7500 sq. mi.
• Headwaters of the Susquehanna River
• All USC counties agreed to “work on water quality projects of mutual interest”
• Includes staff from County Water Quality Committees, Soil and Water Districts, County Planners, Cooperative Extension, Town Supervisors, County Health, Local Lake Associations
Upper Susquehanna Coalition - The Messenger - Who are we?
Upper Susquehanna Coalition: What do we do?
• Develop watershed plans to address local nonpoint source water quality issues
• Provide advice to residents on soil and water conservation issues
• Provide technical support to other county, state and federal agencies
• Install Best Management Practices on farms
• Stabilize erosion on streams, road ditches, road banks and other problem areas
• Build wetlands to reduce flooding and improve water quality
The Chesapeake Bay Watershed:
Covers 64,000 sq mi
Includes 6 states and Washington D.C.
New York contains the headwaters of the Chesapeake Bay
PA
MD
VA
WV DE
NY
There are parts of 19 NY Counties in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Chesapeake Bay Program
In 1983 a multi - state partnership formed to work toward a voluntary restoration of the Bay
The original Program
Members are EPA, D.C.,
PA, VA, MD.
NY, WV, DE signed
an agreement in 2000
to help with water
quality aspects
of the Program
Maryland
Delaware
New York
District of Columbia
Virginia
West Virginia
Pennsylvania
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Boundary
Chesapeake Bay Program
Under the Federal Clean Water Act the Bay is considered “impaired waters” and the Chesapeake Bay Program began to address that issue
Info Source:Chesapeake Bay ProgramImpaired Water
The entire watershed contributes
nutrients and sediments that
lead to the
impairment of the Bay
Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
50% of the Bay’s fresh water
What are the pollutants of concern for the Chesapeake Bay and their major sources?
Pollutants:• NITROGEN - supports algae blooms in salt water resulting in low dissolved
oxygen (the real problem) when the algae dies• PHOSPHORUS - supports algae blooms in fresh water resulting in low
dissolved oxygen (the real problem) when the algae dies• SEDIMENT - directly smothers aquatic plants and animals and indirectly
impacts all living resources by reducing light
Sources:• Urban runoff, sewage treatment plants, septic systems• Runoff from agricultural operations• Runoff from forests• Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
Nitrogen Loads Delivered to the Chesapeake Bay by Jurisdiction
109.21
77.80
7.15 5.02 3.58
56.74
18.23
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PA VA MD NY WV DE DC
(million lbs/
year)
2002
39 %
28 %
20%
7 %
3 % 2 % 1%
Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
Sediment Loads Delivered to the Chesapeake Bay by Jurisdiction
1.112
2.379
0.3410.006
1.011
0.145 0.0550.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
PA VA MD NY WV DE DC
(million t
ons/
year)
2002
22%
47%
20%
3%7% 1% >1%
Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
The entire watershed contributes
nutrients and sediments that
lead to the
impairment of the Bay
Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
50% of the Bay’s fresh water
Why is this important to New Yorkers?• A recent lawsuit has resulted in a court order to cleanup the Bay.
This lawsuit will require EPA to enact a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed, including NY by 2011.
• The TMDL sets a maximum limit for pollutant levels in a Waterbody and these levels are reached and maintained through permits and other regulatory means.
• Municipalities, businesses, farmers, residents and others who produce sediment or nutrients could be affected.
• Regulations could impact the Local Economy
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)For Individual Pollutants
• Required under Section 303 (d) of the Clean Water Act
• TMDL = WLA + LA + MOS
• TMDL - A water body’s loading capacity for a particular pollutant
• WLA - Sum of point source waste load allocations
• LA - Sum of non-point source load allocations
• MOS - Margin of Safety
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)Why avoidance is Good
• Prevent out of state regulatory control
• Mitigate the need for sweeping permit
changes
• Allow those who are impacted local control
and decision making
But, There is Some Good News…• “The Chesapeake Bay Program partnership has
agreed to develop and carry out a cooperative approach to remove water quality impairments by 2010. This will allow them more flexibility in how they restore the Bay without restrictive TMDL regulations." Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
• The Challenge: Clean up the Bay by 2010 and avoid regulations in 2011
NY Agreed to Help
In 2000, Governor Pataki joined executives from the other Chesapeake Bay Watershed states and the federal government in agreeing to:
• “Work cooperatively to achieve a clean Chesapeake Bay by 2011”
• “Provide for public participation”
• “Collaborate on the development and use of innovative measures to achieve the necessary reductions”
A Window of Opportunity
We should take advantage of this unique “Window of Opportunity” to develop our own strategy to address this potential regulatory issue.
Info Source:Chesapeake Bay Program
New York Goals developed by the CBP,
based on Computer Model and Water Sampling Information
Approach: Develop a plan that helps the Bay meet its clean water standards and avoid a
regulatory TMDL
• Inform stakeholders, get feedback, challenge them to help
• Develop a plan that addresses economic development as well as water quality issues
• Develop a plan that helps local communities first and second, has downstream benefits
• Account for our past good practices to help get us closer to the goal
• Lobby for federal funds to support the increased efforts that will be needed to accomplish the necessary tasks
Tributary Strategy Development
Three Work Groups have started to help DEC develop the NY Tributary Strategy:
• OUTREACH GROUP
• SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT GROUP
• STRATEGY ADVISORY GROUP
OUTREACH
• We are giving presentations to discuss the issue and solicit feedback and questions
• We will hold informational meetings on the strategy after a draft is developed to gain further input
• We suggest interested individuals subscribe to the “Bay Journal” a free publication which can keep them informed on all aspects of this issue.
SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT• We are in the process of documenting all past
practices that have resulted in nutrient and sediment reductions to take full credit for these activities
• We are reviewing the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model to ensure it accurately describes NY contributions
• We are partnering with University researchers to investigate other models, practices and approaches that will help NY more easily reach it goals
STRATEGY ADVICE
• We are soliciting individuals from all of the major stakeholder groups to help suggest what should be in the Strategy
• We are providing information to New York’s member of the “Bay Blue Ribbon Panel”, a group which is soliciting funding support from Congress
What can Stakeholders do?• Understand the issue - visit
www.chesapeakebay.net
• Inform others
More Information?
Upper Susquehanna CoalitionWeb Site: www.u-s-c.org
James Curatolo Watershed Coordinator
Chesapeake Bay ProgramWeb Site: www.chesapeakebay.net