chemical mechanism is dominant

6
Chemical mechanism is dominant Nature selects the protein for divergent evolution from a pool of enzymes whose mechanism provide a partial mechanism, or provide the means to stabilize an energetically unfavorable intermediate or transition state. The original enzyme might have acquired a low level of the new activity through adventitious mutations. Subsequently the new enzyme would evolve (selective pressure) to increase the proficiency of the new reaction at the loss of its original. The old and new enzymes would be homologous and belong to a mechanistically diverse superfamily. Examples of this type of evolution are seen in the enolase, amidohydrolase/phosphotriesterase, and crotonase superfamilies.

Upload: boaz

Post on 12-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Chemical mechanism is dominant. Nature selects the protein for divergent evolution from a pool of enzymes whose mechanism provide a partial mechanism, or provide the means to stabilize an energetically unfavorable intermediate or transition state. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chemical mechanism is dominant

Chemical mechanism is dominant• Nature selects the protein for divergent evolution from a

pool of enzymes whose mechanism provide a partial mechanism, or provide the means to stabilize an energetically unfavorable intermediate or transition state.

• The original enzyme might have acquired a low level of the new activity through adventitious mutations. Subsequently the new enzyme would evolve (selective pressure) to increase the proficiency of the new reaction at the loss of its original.

• The old and new enzymes would be homologous and belong to a mechanistically diverse superfamily.

• Examples of this type of evolution are seen in the enolase, amidohydrolase/phosphotriesterase, and crotonase superfamilies.

Page 2: Chemical mechanism is dominant

Structural Alignment of Phosphoribosylanthranilate Isomerase, Indoleglycerol Phosphate Synthase, and TrpS()

Structural alignments of (a) PRAI (green) and IGPS (purple) and (b) IGPS (purple) and -TrpS (yellow). The ligand for the PRAI reaction is shown in yellow, the ligand for the IGPS reaction is shown in orange, and the ligand for the -TrpS reaction is shown in blue.

A B

Page 3: Chemical mechanism is dominant

Superposition of OMPDC and KGPDC

Structural alignment of 3-Keto-L-gulonate 6-phosphate decarboxylase (KGPDC) (purple) with bound L-gulonate 6-phosphate (yellow) and OMPDC (green) with bound UMP (orange). Although they share limited sequence identity, both enzymes adopt a conserved ()8 barrel fold. The quaternary relationship between the two individual subunits in the dimer is highly conserved.

Page 4: Chemical mechanism is dominant

Location of Catalytic groups in the Super Family

A striking feature of this super family is the conserved location of the catalytic groups. This supports the hypothesis that these enzymes arose by divergent evolution, since there is no reason that the functional groups should lie on the same strand.

The relative orientation (order) of the groups around the barrel is required to provide adequate coordination of the metal and to place the catalytic bases on opposite sides of the substrate. There is no strict structural requirement that the metal ligands lie on the third, fourth, and fifth strands.

Strand 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Enolase D E DE K (H) (K)

MR KxK D EEP E D H E

MLE KxK D EQP DE K (E)

Base blue, acid red, and Mg2+ ligands green.

Page 5: Chemical mechanism is dominant

OMPDC and KGPDC Use the Same Active Site Residues for Different Purposes

The active site resides in OMPDC and KGPDC are remarkably similar, yet they serve different purposes in their reaction schemes.

Page 6: Chemical mechanism is dominant

Conclusions

• It seems likely that in one case the (/)8 barrel arose via gene duplication of a smaller folding domain.

• Did all (/)8 barrels arise with this mechanism? Probably not.

• Structures provide insight into enzyme evolution, but not always answers!