chemical facilities safety - executive order 13560

12
EO 13650 Executive Order on Chemical Facility Safety 06/13/2022 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1

Upload: dave-smith-usepa-office-of-environmental-information

Post on 17-May-2015

256 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

EO 13650 Executive Order on Chemical

Facility Safety

04/12/2023U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1

Page 2: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

• Background– West, TX fertilizer

plant explosion– Potentially

hazardous facilities not on radar

– Information gaps and lack of coordination

Executive Order

Page 3: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

• Executive Order– Signed on August 1, 2013

• Objectives:– improve operational coordination

with state and local partners;– enhance Federal agency coordination

and information sharing;– modernize policies, regulations and

standards; and– work with stakeholders to identify

best practices.

Executive Order

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/01/executive-order-improving-chemical-facility-safety-and-security

Page 4: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

Establish Cross-Agency Collaboration

Cross-Agency Workgroup

Department of Homeland Security

Environmental Protection Agency

Department of Labor

Department of Justice

Department of Agriculture

Department of Transportation

Co-Chairs:DHS SecretaryEPA AdministratorSecretary of Labor

Consultation: - Council on Environmental Quality- National Security Staff- Domestic Policy Council- Office of Science and Technology Policy- Office of Management and Budget (OMB)- White House Office of Cabinet Affairs- Others as designated by the President

The Working Group shall consist of the head of each of the representative agencies or their designated representatives at the Assistant Secretary level or higher

Governance

Page 5: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

Ensure that: – State homeland security advisors, – State Emergency Response Commissions (SERCs),– Tribal Emergency Response Commissions (TERCs), – Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs),– Tribal Emergency Planning Committees (TEPCs), – State regulators, and – first responders

… have ready access to key information in a useful format to prevent, prepare for, and respond to chemical incidents

Objective: Improve Operational Coordination

Page 6: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

• Improve the safety and security of chemical facilities through regulations, information reporting requirements, site inspections, and voluntary partnerships

• Establish a cross-agency workgroup, co-chaired by DHS, EPA and DOL, with additional agencies participating

• Initiate innovative approaches for working together on a broad range of activities, such as identification of high-risk facilities, inspections, enforcement, and incident investigation and follow up

Objective: Federal Coordination and Information Sharing

Page 7: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

• The Executive Order requires that the Federal agencies deploy a regional pilot program that will validate best practices and test innovative new methods for Federal interagency collaboration on chemical facility safety and security

• Federal agencies are specifically directed to modernize the collection and sharing of chemical facility information to maximize the effectiveness of risk reduction efforts and reduce duplicative efforts

Objective: Federal Coordination and Information Sharing

Page 8: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

• Work with stakeholders to improve chemical safety and security through agency programs, private sector initiatives, Federal guidance, standards, and regulations

• Example: Reduce risks associated with ammonium nitrate - agencies to examine new options to address the safe and secure storage, handling, and sale of this explosive chemical

Objective: Modernizing Policies, Regulations and Standards

Page 9: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

• Agencies to determine if additional chemicals should be covered by existing Federal regulatory programs – initial programs to consider:– EPA – Risk Management Program (RMP)– EPA – Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know (TRI and TIER II)– DHS – Chemical Facilities Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATs)– DOL – Process Safety Management Standards (PSM)– DOL – Chemical Plant National Emphasis Program (NEP)– USCG – Maritime Port Security– DOJ – ATF Explosives

• In addition, agencies will consider whether to pursue an independent, high-level assessment of the US approach to chemical facility risk management to identify additional recommendations for all levels of government and industry to reduce the risk of catastrophic chemical incidents in the future

Objective: Modernizing Policies, Regulations and Standards

Page 10: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

Key Federal agencies to convene a wide range of interested stakeholders, including representatives from:

• industry, • state, • local, • tribal governments, • non-governmental organizations, and the • first responder community,

… to identify and share successes to date and best practices to reduce safety and security risks in the production and storage of potentially harmful chemicals, including through the use of safer alternatives, adoption of best practices, and potential public-private partnerships

Objective: Working with Stakeholders to Identify Best Practices

Page 11: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

Implementation Timeline Days Event Date Ref Description Sep-

13Oct-

13Nov-

13Dec-

13Jan-

14Feb-

14Mar-

14Apr-

14May-

14Jun-

14Jul-14

Aug-14

Sep-14

Oct-14

Within 270of EO signing 14-Aug-14

2(c) The Working Group shall meet no less than quarterly to discuss the status of efforts to implement this order. The Working Group is encouraged to invite other affected agencies, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to attend these meetings as appropriate. Additionally, the Working Group shall provide, within 270 days of the date of this order, a status report to the President through the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.

Within 135of EO signing 6-Feb-14 3 The Working Group shall develop a plan to support and further enable efforts by State regulators, State, local, and tribal emergency responders, chemical facility owners and operators, and local and tribal communities to work together to improve chemical facility safety and security

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 3(b) The Attorney General, through the head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), shall assess the feasibility of sharing data related to the storage of explosive materials with SERCs, TEPCs, and LEPCs

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 3(c) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall assess the feasibility of sharing Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) data with SERCs, TEPCs, and LEPCs on a categorical basis

Within 45of EO signing 3-Oct-13 4(a) The Working Group shall deploy a pilot program, involving the EPA, Department of Labor, Department of Homeland Security, and any other appropriate agency, to validate best practices and to test innovative methods for Federal interagency collaboration regarding chemical facility safety and security. The pilot program shall operate in at least one region and shall integrate regional Federal, State, local, and tribal assets, where appropriate. 

Within 270of EO signing 14-Aug-14

4(b) The Working Group shall create comprehensive and integrated standard operating procedures for a unified Federal approach for identifying and responding to risks in chemical facilities (including during pre-inspection, inspection execution, post-inspection, and post-accident investigation activities), incident reporting and response procedures, enforcement, and Tcollection, storage, and use of facility information

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 4(c) the Working Group shall consult with the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) and determine what, if any, changes are required to existing memorandums of understanding (MOUs) and processes between EPA and CSB, ATF and CSB, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and CSB for timely and full disclosure of information.

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 5(a) The Working Group shall develop an analysis, including recommendations, on the potential to improve information collection by and sharing between agencies to help identify chemical facilities which may not have provided all required information or may be non-compliant with Federal requirements to ensure chemical facility safety

Within 180of EO signing 10-Apr-14 5(b) The Working Group shall produce a proposal for a coordinated, flexible data-sharing process which can be utilized to track data submitted to agencies for federally regulated chemical facilities, including locations, chemicals, regulated entities, previous infractions, and other relevant information.

Page 12: Chemical Facilities Safety - Executive Order 13560

Implementation Timeline

Days Event Date Ref Description Sep-13

Oct-13

Nov-13

Dec-13

Jan-14

Feb-14

Mar-14

Apr-14

May-14

Jun-14

Jul-14

Aug-14

Sep-14

Oct-14

Within 180of EO signing 10-Apr-14 5(c) The Working Group shall identify and recommend possible changes to streamline and otherwise improve data collection to meet the needs of the public and Federal, State, local, and tribal agencies (including those charged with protecting workers and the public), consistent with the Paperwork Reduction Act and other relevant authorities, including opportunities to lessen the reporting burden on regulated industries.

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(a)(i) develop options for improved chemical facility safety and security that identifies improvements to existing risk management practices through agency programs

Within 906(a)(i) 10-Apr-14 6(a)(ii) engage key stakeholders to discuss the options and other means to improve chemical risk management that may be available

Within 906(a)(ii) 14-Aug-

146(a)(iii) develop a plan for implementing practical and effective improvements to

chemical risk management identified pursuant to subsections (a)(i) and (ii) of this section

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(b) the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Agriculture shall develop a list of potential regulatory and legislative proposals to improve the safe and secure storage, handling, and sale of ammonium nitrate and identify ways in which ammonium nitrate safety and security can be enhanced under existing authorities.

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(c) the Administrator of EPA and the Secretary of Labor shall review the chemical hazards covered by the Risk Management Program (RMP) and the Process Safety Management Standard (PSM) and determine if the RMP or PSM can and should be expanded to address additional regulated substances and types of hazards.

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(c) In addition, the EPA and the Department of Labor shall develop a plan, including a timeline and resource requirements, to expand, implement, and enforce the RMP and PSM in a manner that addresses the additional regulated substances and types of hazards.

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(d) the Secretary of Homeland Security shall identify a list of chemicals, including poisons and reactive substances, that should be considered for addition to the CFATS Chemicals of Interest list.Management Standard (PSM) and determine if the RMP or PSM can and should be expanded to address additional regulated substances and types of hazards.

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(e)(i) the Secretary of Labor shall: (i) identify any changes that need to be made in the retail and commercial grade exemptions in the PSM Standard; and

Within 90of EO signing 5-Dec-13 6(e)(ii) the Secretary of Labor shall: (ii) issue a Request for Information designed to

identify issues related to modernization of the PSM Standard and related standards necessary to meet the goal of preventing major chemical accidents.