chars livelihoods programme clp-2 districts: an ......chars livelihoods programme clp-2 districts:...

Chars Livelihoods Programme

CLP-2 Districts: An Assessment of the Number of Core Participant Households and Island Char Villages

Stuart Kenward and Rafiqul Islam (IML Director and IML Unit Manager)

Innovation, Monitoring and Learning Division

August (3) 2010

CLP-2 districts: an assessment of the number of CPHH and island char villages ii

Table of Content 0Acronyms......................................................................................................................... 1 7iii 1Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 8iv 21. Purpose of the study ................................................................................................. 1 91 32. Methodology..............................................................................................................2 01 43. Results ...................................................................................................................... 2 12

53.1. Assessment of the data provided by IMOs........................................................ 2 22 63.2. Households meeting CLP selection criteria....................................................... 2 33

73.2.1. Modifying CLP criteria to identify more CPHHs......................................... 2 44 83.3. Achieving the target of 67,000 CPHH: Consolidating the Numbers .................. 2 56 93.4. Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of households..................... 2 66

1 03.4.1. Household size and composition............................................................... 2 77 1 13.4.2. Income, expenditure and assets................................................................ 2 87 1 23.4.3. Food consumption and coping strategies.................................................. 2 98

1 34. Conclusion and Recommendations...........................................................................3 09 1 4Annex 1: Questionnaires ................................................................................................ 3 110 1 5Annex 2: Output Tables ..................................................................................................3 215 1 6Annex 3: List of identified island char villages in Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari, Rangpur, Pabna and Tangail Districts ............................................................................................3 322

CLP-2 districts: an assessment of the number of CPHH and island char villages iii

0Acronyms ATP Asset Transfer Phase

CLP Chars Livelihoods Programme

CPHH Core Participant Household

DEMO Data Entry and Monitoring Officer

GBF Grameen Bikash Foundation

GKS

Gono Kalyan Sangstha

GPS

Global Positioning System

IML Innovation Monitoring and Learning Division

IMO Implementing Organisation

MMS Manab Mukti Sangha

PHH

Participating household

pppd

Per person per day

RDRS Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Services

Tk. Taka

CLP-2 districts: an assessment of the number of CPHH and island char villages iv

1Executive Summary During the design phase for CLP-2, data were provided by Implementing Organisations (IMOs) about the number of island chars and the population living on those island chars in the districts of Nilphamari, Rangpur, Lalmonirhat, Pabna and Tangail, the CLP-2 working area. The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy of that data and provide an estimate about the number of core participant households (CPHHs) currently living in island char villages in these districts. Data were first collected during February 2010 in Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari and Rangpur. Six villages were randomly selected, two from each district, and enumerators from a local company, Grameen Bikash Foundation (GBF), collected socio-economic data from every household in these six villages. In addition, CLP Data Entry and Monitoring Officers (DEMOs) visited every island char village to understand the boundaries, the population and to collect GPS coordinates. A second survey, using the same approach was conducted during May 2010 from 3 island char villages in Pabna and 4 island char villages in Tangail. Data were also collected from 3 more villages, one each from Nilphamari, Lalmonirhat and Rangpur to increase the sample size in these Districts. A team of CLP Community Development Organisers (CDOs) visited all island char villages in Tangail and Pabna to understand their boundaries, their population and to collect their GPS coordinates. The data indicate there are lower than expected numbers of households likely to meet the current CLP selection criteria. Factors contributing to this are the relatively smaller number of island chars and consequently smaller island char population in the ‘new’ CLP districts compared to the ‘old’ CLP districts. The study shows that 23.7% of households living in island char villages across the five Districts meet the CLP selection criteria which equates to about 18,000 households. Combining this figure with the 21,259 CLP-1 ‘missed’ households in Kurigram and Gaibandha (therefore totalling 39,312 households) will mean a shortfall of approximately 27,688 households in reaching the target of support to 67,000 core participant households. Modifying the CLP criteria to not exclude households that share crop and that have assets of value up to 15,000 Taka, could be an option for achieving the target of 67,000 CPHHs. This would create a ‘second tier’ of CPHH who are still extremely vulnerable who could receive a reduced package of support from the Programme. Another option would be to target households on island char villages falling under other Districts e.g. island char villages further up the Padma River towards the border with India.

CLP-2 districts: an assessment of the number of CPHH and island char villages 1

1. 2Purpose of the study The CLP-2 logical framework included in the Programme Memorandum (dated 2nd March 2010) states that the Programme will provide support to 67,000 core participant households (CPHHs). During the design phase for CLP-2, data were provided by three implementing organisations (IMOs) on the number of island char villages and their population within the proposed CLP-2 working area. These data were clearly important for planning purposes and consequently needed verifying. For planning purposes it was also important to understand how many households would be likely to meet CLP’s selection criteria from this island char population, whether the target of 67,000 could be achieved and what their demographic and socio-economic characteristics were. The purpose of this study was therefore to:

• verify the data on the approximate number of island char villages and island char households previously provided by implementing organisations (IMOs);

• provide an indication of the likely number of households that meet CLP selection criteria in island char villages from the five ‘new’ districts, namely Lalmonirhat, Rangpur, Nilphamari, Pabna and Tangail;

• collect basic demographic, socio-economic, food security, income and expenditure, and asset data on island char households in the five ‘new’ districts.

2. 3Methodology Two surveys were conducted. The first survey was carried out in Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari and Rangpur during February 2010. This involved: a) Grameen Bikash Foundation (GBF), a local data collection company, visiting all households from six randomly selected villages (two from each district) and administering the questionnaire contained in Annex 1; and b) CLP’s Data Entry and Monitoring Officers (DEMOs) visiting all island char villages to geo-reference them, to understand their boundaries and to ascertain the exact number of households living there. An initial analysis indicated a lower than expected number of households likely to meet the CLP criteria. The response was two-fold. Firstly, a team from the Innovation, Monitoring and Learning Division (IML) was mobilised to ‘ground truth’ the results in Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari and Rangpur which found the data to be a true reflection of the actual situation on the ground. Secondly, a survey was planned for Pabna and Tangail. The second survey followed the same methodology as the first. Data were collected from all households residing in seven villages from Pabna and Tangail during May 2010, employing the questionnaire in Annex 1. In addition, data were collected from 3 more villages in Lalmonirhat, Rangpur and Nilphamari to increase the sample size in these districts. CLP CDOs visited all island char villages in Pabna and Tangail to geo-reference them, to understand their boundaries and to ascertain the number of households living there.


Table 1 shows that census data were collected from just under 8% of all island char villages and just over 4% of all island char resident households in the five ‘new’ districts. Table 1: Sample sizes Lalmonirhat Rangpur Nilphamari Pabna Tangail Total Number of villages in which questionnaire was administered

3

3

3

3

4

16

As a % of all island char villages in the district0

1

6.5

5.8

17.6

4.6

4.6

7.8

Number of households from which data were collected

420

646

1,023

543

691

3,323

As a % of the district’s island char population1

2

2.9

3.2

18.7

4.4

2.9

4.4

3. 4Results

3.1. 9Assessment of the data provided by IMOs Prior to this survey, data were provided for the five ‘new’ districts on the number of unions, the number of island char villages and the number of households living in island char villages by three implementing organisations. Rangpur, Dinajpur Rural Service (RDRS) provided data for Rangpur, Lalmonirhat and Nilphamari; Gono Kalyan Sangstha (GKS) provided data for Pabna and Manab Mukti Sangha (MMS) provided data for Tangail. This information was verified by CLP’s DEMOs and CDOs. The DEMOs and CDOs visited all island char villages to verify their existence, their boundaries and the number of households residing there. They also took GPS coordinates from the centre of each island char village. This study has defined an island char as any of the following2

3:

• year round island char village (never attached to mainland and no section of village part of mainland);

• during extreme dry seasons the island char on which the village is located appears to be attached for a short period of time.

Annex 3 provides a list of all island char villages that were identified by the DEMOs for all five Districts. 1 CLP data, rather than INO data, on number of island char villages and the island char population are used for all five Districts. 2Ibid. 3 In some instances a village may have been split into two (or more) sections due to erosion/ flooding. One part may be attached to the mainland and the other located on an island char but both retain the same name. This survey has focused only on that part of the village located on an island char.


Table 2 provides a comparison between the information provided by the IMOs and the data collected by the DEMOs. Table 2: Comparison between data provided by IMOs and data collected by CLP (number of island char villages)

Total number of island char villages

Data provided by IMOs CLP Deviation Lalmonirhat 54 46 -8 Nilphamari 17 17 0

Pabna 89 65 -24 Rangpur 58 51 -7 Tangail 92 87 5 Total 310 266 -34

Table 3: Comparison between data provided by IMOs and data collected by CLP (households living in island char villages) Total number of households living in island char

villages Data provided by IMOs CLP Deviation Lalmonirhat 21,824 14,267 -7,557 Nilphamari 6,375 5,458 -917 Pabna 19,297 12,384 -6,913 Rangpur 17,234 19,832 2,598 Tangail 25,950 24,232 -1,718 Total 90,680 76,173 -14,507 It is worthy of mention that the number of island char villages in the five ‘new’ CLP districts, and consequently the size of the island char population, is smaller than CLP’s ‘old’ districts. There are +/- 260 island chars in the ‘new’ districts compared to +/- 650 in the ‘old’ districts. The number of households living on island chars in the five ‘new’ districts is just +/- 76,000 compared to +/- 186,000 in the ‘old’ districts.

3.2. 1 0Households meeting CLP selection criteria Table 4 shows the proportion of sampled households meeting the CLP selection criteria. These selection criteria are:

• residency of at least six months in the village; • no ownership of homestead or cultivable land; • not share-cropping; • productive assets =< 5,000 Tk.; • no outstanding loans from a microfinance or credit programme; • not in receipt of NGO cash or asset transfer grants.


Table 4: % of sampled households meeting CLP selection criteria Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total

across all 5

districts % of hhs meeting CLP selection criteria

21.7

23.6

27.3

28.9

17.4

23.7

If the information in Table 4 is used as a guide on the likely number of CPHHs that meet CLP criteria then there are likely to be +/- 18,000 CPHHs from across the 5 ‘new’ districts (Table 5). Table 5: Number of households living in island char villages likely to meet CLP selection criteria, by district Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total3

4 Number of hhs likely to meet CLP selection criteria

3,095

1,288

3,381

5,731

4,216

18,053

The current CLP-2 logical framework defines a target of support to 67,000 CPHHs. Table 6 shows that CLP is likely to fall short of achieving this target based on current plans and the data provided from this survey. Table 6: Identified CPHH Number of CPHH Kurigram and Gaibandha (‘missed’ households)4

5

21,259

Predicted number of CPHHs from five ‘new’ Districts

18,053

Total 39,312

3.2.1. 1 3Modifying CLP criteria to identify more CPHHs Modifying selection criteria would be one way of increasing the number of CPHHs from across the 5 ‘new’ districts. However, this section shows that modifying single selection criteria, even dropping them completely, does not significantly increase the number of CPHHs. For example, Table 7 shows that changing the criteria of ‘productive asset ownership’ from Tk. 5,000 to Tk. 9,000 will only result in an additional 1% (+/- 760 CPHHs) of households from across the five ‘new’ Districts (all other criteria remaining constant)

4 The individual columns do not add up to the ‘total’ exactly because they use different denominators. 5 The 21,259 ‘missed households’ from Kurigram and Gaibandha include households from Bhurungamari and Rajarhat. It is estimated there are +/- 3,000 CPHH from these Upazilas based on the following: there are 18 island char villages; a population of 5,890 living in these island char villages and the assumption that 50% of households will meet CLP selection criteria. Potential households from Nageshwari are not included.


becoming eligible for entry into the programme. Even if this criteria were to be dropped entirely then the proportion of households meeting all other selection criteria from across the five ‘new’ districts would increase to 29.9%, equivalent to an additional +/- 4,700 CPHHs. Table 7: Modifying criteria: % of households by value of productive assets (and meet all other CLP criteria) Value of productive assets (Tk)

Number Total % all 5 districts

<=5000 787 23.7 5001-6000 9 0.3 6001-7000 6 0.2 7001-8000 10 0.3 8001-9000 5 0.2 9000+ 172 5.2 N/A* 2,334 70.2 *do not meet CLP criteria Similarly, modifying the criteria of land ownership (homestead + cultivable) from 0 decimals owned to 50 decimals owned would only result in an additional 2% (1,523 CPHHs) of households from across the five ‘new’ districts (all other criteria remaining constant) becoming eligible. Even if this criteria were to be dropped entirely then the proportion of households meeting all other selection criteria from across the five ‘new’ districts would increase to 26.1%, equivalent to an additional +/- 1,828 CPHHs. Dropping the criteria of ‘no outstanding loans from a microfinance or credit programme’ but keeping all other criteria constant would not significantly increase the number of CPHHs. The proportion of CPHHs would increase from 23.7% to 26.6% equivalent to +/- 2,200 CPHHs. Similarly, dropping the criteria ‘in receipt of NGO cash/ asset transfer grants’ but keeping all other criteria only increases the proportion of CPHHs from 23.7% to 24.3%, equivalent to +/- 450 CPHHs (see tables 4 and 5 respectively in Annex 2.) Modifying the criteria of ‘no share-cropping’ and keeping all other criteria constant would have the greatest impact in terms of increasing the number of CPHHs (Table 8). If this criteria were to be dropped entirely then the proportion of households meeting all other selection criteria from across the five ‘new’ districts would increase to 31.5%, which equates to approximately 23,994 households i.e. an additional +/- 5,900 CPHHs. Table 8: Modifying criteria ‘% of households share cropping’ (but maintaining all other criteria) Area share cropped (decimals) Number Total % all 5 districts 0 787 23.7 1-10 14 0.4 11-20 48 1.4 21-30 67 2 31-40 30 0.9 41-50 17 0.5 50+ 88 2.6 N/A* 2272 68.4 *do not meet CLP criteria


Clearly, modifying a single criterion does not significantly increase the number of CPHH. An option therefore would be to modify two criteria and target a ‘second tier’ of households who do not meet the full CLP criteria but who are still poor and vulnerable. These households could receive a ‘reduced package’ from CLP. Analysis shows that allowing households to share crop and allowing households to have assets of up to 15,000 Taka (as opposed to 5,000 Taka) would result in an additional +/- 10,000 households from the 5 ‘new’ districts and an additional +/- 10,200 households from Kurigram and Gaibandha.5

6

3.3. 1 1Achieving the target of 67,000 CPHH: Consolidating the Numbers Table 9 shows how CLP can achieve the target of 67,000 CPHH if the selection criteria of share cropping and asset status are modified thus creating a ‘second tier’ of CPHHs, as explained above. Table 9: Achieving the target of 67,000 CPHH: Consolidating the Numbers Number of

CPHH Totals

Households meeting existing CLP criteria In five ‘new’ districts

18,053

‘Missed’ households in Kurigram and Gaibandha

21,259

Assume an additional 10,000 households meet CLP criteria (due to inward migration, households naturally splitting etc.)

10,000

Assume 3,000 CPHH from northern Jamalpur 3,000

Sub Total 52,312 ‘Second tier’ households (see above)

In 5 new districts 10,050

In Kurigram and Gaibandha (2.1 and 2.2 villages)

10,200

Sub Total 20,250 Total 72,562

3.4. 1 2Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of households This section provides information on core demographic and socio-economic indicators for both future CPHHs (i.e. those meeting the CLP criteria) and the wider population in the five ‘new’ districts. Comparisons are also made with data from CLP1’s Asset Transfer Phase 4 (ATP4).

6 Relaxing the criteria in the 5 new districts results in 10,050 more households (or 13% of the island char households). If we apply the same principle in Kurigram and Gaibandha where there are approx 79,000 households (in CLP 2.1 and 2.2 villages) then we estimate an additional 10,200 households.


3.4.1. 1 4Household size and composition Table 9 shows that households meeting the CLP criteria in the ‘new’ districts are both smaller and have a higher proportion of female headed households than all the sampled households. An earlier study conducted by IML supports these data on household size suggesting that poorer households are smaller because of partition6

7. One would expect a higher proportion of female headed households amongst the relatively poorer households. Table 9: Household demographics Hhs meeting

all CLP criteria in new districts

All sampled hhs

ATP4 (CLP-1)

% of female-headed households

20.3 8.7 17.2

Mean household size 3.54 4.57 3.72

3.4.2. 1 5Income, expenditure and assets Table 10 shows that income per person per day during the last 30 days was higher than both the national and Rajshahi extreme poverty lines7

8 (Tk. 22 and Tk. 18 respectively in 2009 prices and Tk 24.2 and Tk. 19.8 in 2010 prices allowing for a 10% annual inflation rate) for all sampled households and for those households meeting the CLP criteria. The methodology used in this study to calculate income was identical to that followed for ATP4. Data show that income levels are higher in the ‘new’ districts than amongst ATP4 households, indicating a relatively higher level of wealth amongst the former. This explains why fewer CPHH have been identified than expected. Figures 1 and 2 support this by illustrating that relatively high proportions of all sampled households have income and expenditure levels in excess of Tk. 3,500 over the last 30 days. Table 10: Income, Expenditure and Assets Hhs meeting CLP

criteria in ‘new’ districts

All sampled hhs ATP4 (CLP-1)

% having a member with a salaried wage

2.9 4.6 -

Mean Tk income pppd (last 30 days) 24.36 39.27 19.258

9 Mean Tk expenditure pppd (last 30 days)

26.20 41.65 19.239

10

Mean value of productive assets (Tk)

511 77,726 5641 0

11

7 Scott L. and Islam R., April 2007, Are the Poorest Households Really Larger? 8 Using the same approach to measuring income and expenditure during CLP1 9 Adjusted to 2010 prices allowing for inflation at 10% (from Tk. 17.5) 10 Ibid (from Tk. 17.49) 11 Ibid (from Tk. 513)


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

% o

f all

sam

pled

hhs

up to 500 501-1000 1001-1500

1501-2000

2001-2500

2501-3000

3001-3500

3500+

Income (Tk) last 30 days

Figure 1: Household income categories by district

LalmonirhatNilphamariPabnaRangpurTangail

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

% o

f all

sam

pled

ho

useh

olds

up to 500 501-1000 1001-1500 1501-2000 2001-2500 2501-3000 3001-3500 3500+

Expenditure (Tk) last 30 days

Figure 2: Household expenditure categories by district

LalmonirhatNilphamariPabnaRangpurTangail

3.4.3. 1 6Food consumption and coping strategies

As one might expect, Table 11 shows that adults and children from future CPHHs in the ‘new’ districts applied more food coping strategies during the last 30 days compared to all sampled households. Under 5 children were subject to fewer coping strategies than their parents. Table 11: Food coping strategies Hhs meeting CLP

criteria in new districts All sampled hhs

Number of food coping strategies undertaken by adults during last 30 days*

1.78 1.28

Number of food coping strategies undertaken by children (under 5) during last 30 days

0.34 0.22

*These include: eating smaller meals, eating fewer meals, eating lower quality food and/ or going without food for 24 hours.


4. 5Conclusion and Recommendations This survey has shown that the number of households meeting all the CLP selection criteria in the five ‘new’ districts is lower than anticipated by the designers of the CLP-2 Concept Paper i.e. approximately +/- 18,000 CPHH have been identified. However, past experience has shown that additional CPHHs will be identified in the ‘new’ districts e.g. as households fragment so they can qualify for CLP support. There will however certainly still remain a significant shortfall in the region of 20,000 or so HH meeting all CLP selection criteria. Options to ensure the target of supporting 67,000 CPHHs include:

• modifying selection criteria and creating a second tier of CPHH - of the six criteria, allowing households to share crop and have assets valued up to 15,000 Taka would have the greatest impact allowing the inclusion of a further +/- 10,000 from the new districts and +/- 10,000 from Kurigram and Gaibandha. These households could receive a reduced package of support;

• focusing on new areas outside the 5 ‘new’ districts e.g. supporting households on island chars between Natore and Kushtia (North-west of Pabna) towards the Indian border. The impact of extending to the West is uncertain until a similar study is carried out;


6Annex 1: Questionnaires Village (Geo-referencing) Questionnaire Date: __ __ / __ __ / __ __ __ __

District Upazila Union Village

SL Indicators Code 1. Does the listed village exist? (1=Yes, 2=No)

2. If the listed village exists, is the village naming the same? (1=Yes, 2=No)

3. If the village name is not the same what is the community recognised name?

4. What is the total estimated number of households (Cross check with a few different village members)

5. Is this village is an island char?11

12 1 = Year round island char village (never attached to mainland and no section of village part of mainland) 2 = Year round island char village + section of village attached to mainland throughout the year 3 = Partial year round island char village (i.e. in certain seasons the attached island char villages becomes an island char village) 4 = Attached village (i.e. throughout the year attached to the mainland)

6. Please state the number of household in this village (total)

6.1 Total households living in the island char part of the village

6.2 Total households living on the attached mainland section of village (if applicable)

7. Name of one household

living on the Name Contact # (if any)

a. extreme north of the village

b. extreme south of the village

c. extreme east of the village

d. extreme west of the village

8. GPS reading: N: E: GPS set # Identification #: 9. Community People Identification Information Contact # (if any)

12 An island char is formed as a result of river erosion and silt deposition, and are surrounded by water throughout the year


Consulted: Name a.

b.

c.

d.


Household Questionnaire Date: __ __ / __ __ / __ __ __ __

District Upazila Union Village SL No

Section 1 – Basic Household Demography

1. Are you a male or female headed household? 1 = male, 2 = female 2. Within this household, how many adult male and females and children are there?

Note - chula cooking pot definition for household and child is any household member 15 years of age or less. The household head should be the first person indicated in the table provided.

Age SL. Name Gender –

(1 = male, 2 = female)

Relation1

Health Status2 Year Month

Occupation3

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1Health Status: 1 = disability, 2 = chronic illness (chronic illness = having been persistently ill for the last three months, 3 = without disability or chronic illness), 2Relation: 1 = Household Head, 2 = Spouse, 3 = Child, 4 = Parent, 5 = Parent-in-Law, 6 = Sibling, 7 = Niece / Nephew, 8 = Grandchild, 9 = Grandparent, 10 = Son / Daughter-in-Law, 11= Other (Specify) Occupation: 1= Agricultural Daily Wage Labourer, 2 = Off-farm Daily Wage Labourer, 3= Weaver, 4 = Maid, 5= Rickshaw / Van Puller, 6 = Fisherman, 7 = Occupational Group, 8 = Salaried Wage, 9 = Small Business Owner, 10 = Landowner, 11 = Other (Specify)

3. If any adult male within the household does have a chronic disability or illness, does this reduce their capacity to work compared to when they are well? 1 = yes, 2 = no

4. In the last six months has anyone in your household received any VGD/VGF/old age pension or any other food assistance from the GoB or any other institute? 1 = yes, 2 = no

5. Are you currently receiving any NGO cash or asset transfer grants? 6. Is there anyone else who lives in your home, who does not eat from

the same cooking pot as your family? Please write 0 if no-one else lives in your home. If one or more people do, please indicate their number in the box provided. Please undertake this questionnaire with the

7. Is 6 = 1 (yes), does this person / people work for your household?


Section Two - Residency in Village & Access to Land 8. How long has your household lived in this village?

If the household has lived in the village more than six months, please write 1 in the box provided. If they have lived in the village less than six months, please write 2.

9. Do you or any household member own your homestead land? Please write 0 if no. If the homestead land is owned, please indicate in decimals how big this land is?

10. Do you or any household member own any cultivable land? Please write 0 if no. If the cultivable land is owned, please indicate in decimals how big this land is?

11. Do you or any household member undertake share-cropping? Please write 0 if no. If the household share-crops please indicate in decimals how big this land is?

Section Three – Microfinance Loans

12. Currently, do you or any household member have any outstanding loans from a microfinance or credit programme? Please write the total value of all loans in Taka in box provided. If no loan, write 0.

Section Four – Food Security 13. In the last seven days due to a shortage of food have either household adults or

under five children had to: SL. Food Strategy Adults Under 5yrs Children 1. Eat Smaller Meals 2. Eat Fewer Meals 3. Eat Lower Quality

Food

4. Gone 24hrs Without Food

14. In the last seven days, how many times have household adults and under five

children eaten: Food Type Adults Under 5yrs Children

1. Meat 2. Fish 3. Egg 4. Green Vegetables 5. Milk (not breast) 6. Rice 7. Fruit 8. Other

Section Five – Income, Expenditure & Assets

15. During the last month, how much did your household spend (Tk) on: # Area Taka # Area Taka 1 Food 7 House repairs


2 Asset purchases (land / cattle etc)

8 Loan Repayments

3 Education 9 Health Treatment 4 Clothes 10 Agriculture 5 Household goods 11 Livestock cost 6 Transport 12 Other major

expenses

16. During the last month, how much did your household earn (Tk) from:

# Area Taka # Area Taka 1 Agricultural daily

wage activities 6 Agricultural

activities

2 Non-agricultural wage activities

7 Livestock & livestock product sales

3 Domestic activities 8 Loan Repayments 4 Fishing activities 9 Regular Salaried

Income

5 Small business activities

10 Other

17. How many of the following productive assets does anyone in your household own

or share own? What is the total Taka value of the asset(s) or part of asset that is owned or share-owned?

# Area Taka # Area Taka 1 Land (owned,

mortgaged in or out) 9 Mobile phone

2 Cattle 10 Fishing Net 3 Goats & Sheep 11 Wood / Fruit Tree 4 Poultry 12 TV 5 Boat(s) 13 Radio 6 Rickshaw van / cart 14 Bed/Alna/Chair/Table/Almira 7 Sewing Machine 15 Shallow machine/husking

machine

8 Jewellery 16 Other Enumerator:_______________ Supervisor:______________


7Annex 2: Output Tables Modifying selection criteria Table 1: Modifying criteria: % of households by value of productive assets (and meet all other CLP criteria) Value of productive assets (Tk)

Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total

n 91 241 148 187 120 787 <=5000 % 21.7 23.6 27.3 28.9 17.4 23.7 n 0 2 2 3 2 9 5001-

6000 % 0 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 n 1 2 1 1 1 6 6001-

7000 % 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 n 0 4 1 3 2 10 7001-

8000 % 0 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 n 0 1 0 2 2 5 8001-

9000 % 0 0.1 0 0.3 0.3 0.2 n 14 13 69 35 41 172 9000+ % 3.3 1.3 12.7 5.4 5.9 5.2 n 314 760 322 415 523 2334 N/A* % 74.8 74.3 59.3 64.2 75.7 70.2

*do not meet CLP criteria


Table 2: Modifying criteria: % of households owning land (homestead + cultivable) (and meet all other CLP criteria) Land ownership (decimals)


n 91 241 148 187 120 787 No land % 21.7 23.6 27.3 28.9 17.4 23.7

n 6 13 10 11 2 42 1-10 % 1.4 1.3 1.8 1.7 .3 1.3

n 1 1 8 0 0 10 11-20 % 0.2 0.1 1.5 0 0 0.3

n 0 2 0 1 1 4 21-30 % 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.1 0.1

n 0 0 3 2 0 5 31-40 % 0 0 0.6 0.3 0 0.2

n 1 1 1 0 0 3 41-50 % 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 0 0.1

n 1 0 4 4 5 14 50+ % 0.2 0 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.4 n 320 765 369 441 563 2458 N/A* % 76.2 74.8 68 68.3 81.5 74

*do not meet CLP criteria Table 3: Modifying criteria: % of households share cropping (and meet all other criteria) Share cropping


n 91 241 148 187 120 787 No land % 21.7 23.6 27.3 28.9 17.4 23.7

n 0 11 2 1 0 14 1-10 dec % 0 1.1 0.4 0.2 0 0.4

n 4 28 3 10 3 48 11-20 dec % 1 2.7 0.6 1.5 0.4 1.4

n 5 41 0 18 3 67 21-30 dec % 1.2 4 0 2.8 0.4 2

n 1 9 7 10 3 30 31-40 dec % .2 0.9 1.3 1.5 0.4 0.9

n 1 10 0 4 2 17 41-50 dec % .2 1 0 0.6 0.3 0.5

n 9 30 15 29 5 88 50+ dec % 2.1 2.9 2.8 4.5 0.7 2.6 n 309 653 368 387 555 2272 N/A* % 73.6 63.8 67.8 59.9 80.3 68.4

*do not meet CLP criteria


Table 4: Dropping the criteria ‘outstanding loans from a microfinance or credit programme’ but meeting all other criteria (% of households) Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail All Districts 23.6 24.2 28.4 30 27.4 26.6 Table 5: Dropping the criteria ‘in receipt of NGO cash/ asset transfer grants’ but meeting all other criteria (% of households) Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail All Districts 22.6 24.4 27.4 30.2 17.4 24.3 Receiving NGO cash/ asset transfer grants Table 6: % of households in receipt of NGO cash/ asset transfer grants Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail All Districts All surveyed households (%)

4.3 2.7 0.7 3.9 0 2.3

Socio-economic Characteristics Table 7: Socio-economic characteristics of those households meeting CLP selection criteria Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total

N 21 42 16 53 28 160 % of female headed households

% 23.1 17.4 10.8 28.3 23.3 20.3 N 91 241 148 187 120 787 Mean

household size

mean 3.37 3.47 3.90 3.46 3.49 3.54 N 5 5 3 4 6 23 % having a

member with a salaried wage

% 5.5 2.1 2.0 2.1 5.0 2.9

N 91 241 148 187 120 787 Mean income pppd (last 30 days)

mean 22.52 19.72 19.41 35.92 23.20 24.36

N 91 241 148 187 120 787 Mean expenditure pppd (last 30 days)

mean 24.15 19.72 25.80 37.51 23.60 26.20

N 91 241 148 187 120 787 Mean value of productive assets

mean 735.49 297.43 702.91 372.46 747.75 510.83


Table 8: Socio-economic characteristics of all households surveyed (population) Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total

N 39 83 29 87 50 288 % of female headed households

% 9.3 8.1 5.3 13.5 7.2 8.7 N 420 1023 543 646 691 3323 Mean

household size

mean 4.41 4.37 5.04 4.36 4.81 4.57 N 24 34 16 25 53 152 % having a

member with a salaried wage

% 5.7 3.3 2.9 3.9 7.7 4.6

N 420 1023 543 646 691 3323 Mean income pppd (last 30 days)

mean 51.39 32.96 29.99 49.36 39.14 39.27

N 420 1023 543 646 691 3323 Mean expenditure pppd (last 30 days)

mean 45.79 33.01 41.03 50.12 44.50 41.65

N 420 1023 543 646 691 3323 Mean value of productive assets

mean 169,543.74 64,288.10 68,702.62 59,815.32 65,648.22 77,726.22

Table 9: Income, expenditure and value of productive assets (mean, median and mode) for all sampled households

N Mean

Median

Mode

Household monthly income (Tk) 3323 5330 3000 3000

Household monthly expenditure (Tk) 3323 5671 3400 2000(a) Value of productive assets (Tk)

3323 77726 12200 0

Food Consumption and Coping Strategies Table 10: Number of food coping strategies undertaken by adults during the last 30 days Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total

N 91 241 148 187 120 787 Households meeting selection criteria

mean 2.25 1.68 1.91 1.97 1.14 1.78

N 420 1023 543 646 691 3323 All surveyed households

mean 1.46 1.34 1.41 1.52 0.76 1.28 *These include: eating smaller meals, eating fewer meals, eating lower quality food and/ or going without food for 24 hours.


Table 11: Number of food coping strategies undertaken by under 5 children during the last 30 days Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Total

N 37 108 75 93 52 365 Households meeting selection criteria

mean 0.3 0.19 0.49 0.48 0.17 0.34

N 193 542 279 330 354 1698 All surveyed households

mean 0.11 0.13 0.36 0.38 0.13 0.22 *These include: eating smaller meals, eating fewer meals, eating lower quality food and/ or going without food for 24 hours. Table 12: For households meeting CLP selection criteria, the number of times during last seven days that adults have eaten various food items Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Meat 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.13 Fish 1.05 0.99 1.15 0.98 1.37 Egg 0.23 0.11 0.31 0.29 0.38 Green Vegetables

14.14 16.14 15.50 14.44 14.57

Milk (not breast) 0.16 0.09 0.28 0.17 0.70 Rice 16.69 17.66 17.75 17.25 18.52 Fruit 0.22 0.15 0.32 0.06 0.20 N 91 241 148 187 120 Table 13: For households meeting CLP selection criteria, the number of times during last seven days that adults have eaten various food items Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Meat 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.02 Fish 0.25 0.37 0.48 0.48 0.51 Egg 0.18 0.08 0.16 0.32 0.25 Green Vegetables

4.97 6.89 6.03 5.47 5.92

Milk (not breast) 0.09 0.15 0.93 0 0.61 Rice 7.04 7.75 7.69 7.09 7.80 Fruit 0.18 0.12 0.24 0.04 0.16 N 91 241 148 187 120


Table 14: For all surveyed households, the number of times during last seven days that adults have eaten various food items Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Meat 0.45 0.28 0.13 0.32 0.21 Fish 2.35 1.47 1.91 1.43 2.05 Egg 0.55 0.29 0.37 0.46 0.83 Green Vegetables

15.50 17.12 15.55 15.12 15.69

Milk (not breast) 0.79 0.41 1.76 0.77 1.79 Rice 18.27 18.88 18.87 18.23 19.67 Fruit 0.41 0.26 0.59 0.20 0.38 N 420 1023 543 646 691 Table 15: For all surveyed households, the number of times during last seven days that under 5 children have eaten various food items Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Meat 0.17 0.13 0.04 0.16 0.09 Fish 0.78 0.62 0.92 0.69 0.92 Egg 0.23 0.15 0.17 0.28 0.38 Green Vegetables

6.30 8.32 6.40 6.12 7.38

Milk (not breast) 0.80 0.37 1.44 0.36 1.35 Rice 8.11 9.54 8.61 8.09 9.45 Fruit 0.20 0.15 0.31 0.15 0.22 N 420 1023 543 646 691 Microfinance Table 16: % of households having an outstanding loan from a microfinance or credit programme Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail All surveyed households

17.1 11.4 6.4 9.8 41.7

Residency in village and access to land Table 17: % of households living in village for equal to or greater than 6 months Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail All surveyed households

99 98.5 99.6 98.5 98.1


Table 18: % of all surveyed households with access to land Lalmonirhat Nilphamari Pabna Rangpur Tangail Own homestead land

52.1 40 36.1 27.9 24.9

Own cultivable land

37.9 35.9 28.5 22.4 33.9

Undertake share cropping

26.7 44.5 31.9 36.7 37

Table 19: Access to land through ownership or share cropping (mean, median and mode) for all sampled households

N Mean

Ownership of homestead land (decimals) 3323 5.12

Ownership of cultivable land (decimals) 3323 36.33 Share-cropping (decimals) 3323 25.89


8Annex 3: List of identified island char villages in Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari, Rangpur, Pabna and Tangail Districts

SL District Upazila Union Island char village 1. Lalmonirhat Aditmari Durgapur Char Kutibari 2. Lalmonirhat Aditmari Mohishkhocha Chandimari 3. Lalmonirhat Aditmari Mohishkhocha Dakhin Balapara 4. Lalmonirhat Aditmari Mohishkhocha Gobardhan 5. Lalmonirhat Aditmari Mohishkhocha Guratipara 6. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Dawa bari Dakhin Dawabari 7. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Dawa bari Kishamot Nohali 8. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Dawa bari Purba Dawa bari 9. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Dawa bari Uttar Dawa bari 10. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Goddimari Chhayani Pitti Phata 11. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Patikapara Poschim Holdibari 12. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Patikapara Purbo Holdibari 13. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Patikapara Satvair Char 14. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Shingimari Char Dhubni 15. Lalmonirhat Hatibandha Sindurna Char Sindurna 16. Lalmonirhat Kaliganj Bhotmari Bhotmari 17. Lalmonirhat Kaliganj Bhotmari Jamirbari 18. Lalmonirhat Kaliganj Bhotmari Kalikapur 19. Lalmonirhat Kaliganj Bhotmari Solmari 20. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Bashdaha 21. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Char Kalmati 22. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Nama Khuniagach

23. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Pachim Horinchara Modho Char

24. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Purbo Horinchora 25. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Sonapur Horinchara 26. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Khuniagach Talpotti Horinchara 27. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Boalmari 28. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Char Khatamari 29. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Char Kulaghat 30. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Char Shiberkuti 31. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Dharmapal 32. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Digrirchar 33. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Kulaghat Shiberkuti 34. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Mogalhat Kharuakuti 35. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Mogalhat Kurul Char 36. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Mogalhat Nagartari 37. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Mogalhat Phalimari 38. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Rajpur Bhutnath 39. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Rajpur Changra 40. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Rajpur Khalaighat 41. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Rajpur Kishamat Chinatuli


42. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Rajpur Saranjami Khalaighat 43. Lalmonirhat Lalmonirhat Sadar Rajpur Taluk Kaunia 44. Lalmonirhat Patgram Dahagram Kaderer Char 45. Lalmonirhat Patgram Jongra Dhabalguri 46. Lalmonirhat Patgram Kuchlibari Panbari

47. Nilphamari Dimla Jhunagach Chapani Dakhin Sonakhuli

48. Nilphamari Dimla Jhunagach Chapani Purbo Satunama

49. Nilphamari Dimla Jhunagach Chapani Vendabari

50. Nilphamari Dimla Khalisha Chapani Purbo Baishpukur 51. Nilphamari Dimla Purbo Satnain Jhar Singhersor 52. Nilphamari Dimla Purbo Satnain Purbo Satnai 53. Nilphamari Dimla Tepa Khoribari Purbo Khoribari 54. Nilphamari Dimla Tepa Khoribari Uttar Khoribari 55. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Dauabari Dauabari 56. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Dauabari Nekbakto 57. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Dauabari Siddheshori Majapara 58. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Golmundi Holdi Bari 59. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Golmundi Vabon Char 60. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Koimari Alsiyer Char 61. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Koimari Haragas Ban Parar Char 62. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Soulmari 1 No. Gopal Jhar Char Vorat 63. Nilphamari Jaldhaka Soulmari 4.No. Taluk Soulmari 64. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Char Durgapur 65. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Dharai 66. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Kuksha 67. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Naradhah 68. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Pan Para 69. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Saitupi 70. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Boro Durgapur 71. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Komorpur 72. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Gohail Nagar 73. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Ramnarayanpur 74. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Dhalar Char 75. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Latifpur 76. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Khoyerdikandhi 77. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Aknai 78. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Kakshimul 79. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Dori Char 80. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Mirpur 81. Pabna Bera Dhalar Char Maldah 82. Pabna Bera Haturia Nakalia Char Hatail Aralia 83. Pabna Bera Haturia Nakalia Char Nagda 84. Pabna Bera Haturia Nakalia Char Nakalia 85. Pabna Bera Haturia Nakalia Char Paikhondo


86. Pabna Bera Haturia Nakalia Char Pechakola 87. Pabna Bera Haturia Nakalia Char Sarashia 88. Pabna Bera Notun Bharenga Akbakshowa 89. Pabna Bera Notun Bharenga Char Bakshowa 90. Pabna Bera Notun Bharenga Char Safulla 91. Pabna Bera Notun Bharenga Purbo Sree Kanthadia 92. Pabna Bera Puran Bharenga Dewnai 93. Pabna Bera Puran Bharenga Gonggrajani 94. Pabna Bera Puran Bharenga Kalyanpur 95. Pabna Bera Puran Bharenga Pengua 96. Pabna Bera Puran Bharenga Tara nagar 97. Pabna Bera Rup Pur Boro Bhabanipur 98. Pabna Bera Rup Pur Kalikabari 99. Pabna Bera Rup Pur Kodomi Shorifpur 100. Pabna Bera Rup Pur Pagla 101. Pabna Bera Rup Pur Ramnagar 102. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Char Bolorampur 103. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Char Modhupur 104. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Jatkakoria 105. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Khash Char 106. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Khash Char Bolorampur 107. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Maj Para 108. Pabna Pabna Sadar Bharara Pirpur Purbo Para 109. Pabna Pabna Sadar Char Tarapur Aira Hohail Bari 110. Pabna Pabna Sadar Char Tarapur Bahir Char 111. Pabna Pabna Sadar Char Tarapur Dighi Gohail Bari 112. Pabna Pabna Sadar Char Tarapur Vaduria Dangi 113. Pabna Pabna Sadar Dogachi Char Raninagar 114. Pabna Pabna Sadar Hemayetpur Char Ratonpur 115. Pabna Pabna Sadar Hemayetpur Char Vobanipur 116. Pabna Pabna Sadar Hemayetpur Char Vogiratpur 117. Pabna Sujanagar Najirgonj Char Kashinathpur 118. Pabna Sujanagar Najirgonj Char Khapur 119. Pabna Sujanagar Najirgonj Char Rajpur 120. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Char Chandipur 121. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Char Khalilpur 122. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Char Shripur 123. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Hugladangi 124. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Kestopur 125. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Manusala 126. Pabna Sujanagar Sagorkandi Ramkantapur 127. Pabna Sujanagar Vayena Char Bishownathpur 128. Pabna Sujanagar Vayena Char Manikdir 129. Rangpur Gangachhara Alambiditar Paikan Hazipara 130. Rangpur Gangachhara Gozoghanta Char Salapak 131. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Arazi Sreeram


132. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Balatari 133. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Chaddabari 134. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Chilakhal 135. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Dhaker Char 136. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Khoi Khawa 137. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Kholayer Char 138. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Maddhabinbina 139. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Majher Char 140. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Purbo Binbina 141. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Purbo Motokpur 142. Rangpur Gangachhara Kolkondo Uttar Chialkhal 143. Rangpur Gangachhara Lakhhitari Char Isorkul 144. Rangpur Gangachhara Lakhhitari Joyram Ojha 145. Rangpur Gangachhara Lakhhitari Poschim Isli 146. Rangpur Gangachhara Lakhhitari Purbo Isli 147. Rangpur Gangachhara Lakhhitari Sangkordoho 148. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Alal 149. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Char Vangagora 150. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Hazirpara 151. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Kamdeb 152. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Kishmot Morneya 153. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Nilerpara 154. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Norshin 155. Rangpur Gangachhara Morneya Ramdeb 156. Rangpur Gangachhara Nohali Char Bagdohora 157. Rangpur Gangachhara Nohali Char Nohali 158. Rangpur Kaunia Bala Para Araji Harishar 159. Rangpur Kaunia Bala Para Araji Khordo Bhutchara 160. Rangpur Kaunia Bala Para Dhushmara 161. Rangpur Kaunia Bala Para Gopidanga 162. Rangpur Kaunia Haragach Char Nazirdoho 163. Rangpur Kaunia Haragach Dhumgara 164. Rangpur Kaunia Haragach Pollimari 165. Rangpur Kaunia Haragach Sit Nazir Doho

166. Rangpur Kaunia Haragach Pouroshava Char Chotura

167. Rangpur Kaunia Shahidbag Prannath Char 168. Rangpur Kaunia Tapa Madhupur Azom Kha 169. Rangpur Kaunia Tapa Madhupur Gonai 170. Rangpur Kaunia Tapa Madhupur Tapur Char 171. Rangpur Pirgachha Sawla Dowlat Kha 172. Rangpur Pirgachha Sawla Gabura 173. Rangpur Pirgachha Sawla Juyan 174. Rangpur Pirgachha Sawla Kandina 175. Rangpur Pirgachha Sawla Ram Shingh 176. Rangpur Pirgachha Sawla Sawla


177. Rangpur Pirgachha Tambulpur Char Rohomot 178. Rangpur Pirgachha Tambulpur Char Tambulpur 179. Rangpur Pirgachha Tambulpur Rohomatar Char 180. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Bania Bari 181. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Basudab Kol 182. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Borar Boyra 183. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Gobinda Pur 184. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Jagotkura 185. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Jumarboyra 186. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Khas Borarboyra 187. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Ramail 188. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Sosua 189. Tangail Bhuya Pur Arjuna Taltola 190. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Baronalsi Para 191. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Bilchapra Para 192. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Bodra Shimul 193. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Boiya Para 194. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Boro Joypur 195. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Changoni 196. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Chondi Pur 197. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Choto Nalsia Para 198. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Digrichar 199. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Foldha Para 200. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Gopinathpur 201. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Jongipur 202. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Kalipur 203. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Kashiahata 204. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Khondokar Para 205. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Megar Potul 206. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Nikla Para 207. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Pugi Para 208. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Raja Pur 209. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Rampura 210. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Rehai Gubshara 211. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Shohagi Para 212. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gabshara Soroypara 213. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gupshara Beltia Para 214. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gupshara Char Behari 215. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gupshara Gopal Ganj 216. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gupshara Rehai Chunduni 217. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gupshara Rulipara 218. Tangail Bhuya Pur Gupshara Sholshon 219. Tangail Bhuya Pur Nikrail Bania Gati 220. Tangail Bhuya Pur Nikrail Belua 221. Tangail Bhuya Pur Nikrail Nalcia 222. Tangail Bhuya Pur Nikrail Pachgashi


223. Tangail Kalihati Dorgapur Beri Potol 224. Tangail Kalihati Dorgapur Singuli 225. Tangail Kalihati Dorgapur Voyrob Bari 226. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Afzalpur 227. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Alipur 228. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Belutia 229. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Benu Kursha 230. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Benud Nuhuria 231. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Bewara Marua 232. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Doybo Gati 233. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Gobindopur 234. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Kalai 235. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Kursha Benu 236. Tangail Kalihati Gohalia Bari Shamsoyl 237. Tangail Nagarpur Doptior Bakkatari 238. Tangail Nagarpur Doptior kammutia 239. Tangail Nagarpur Doptior Mizail 240. Tangail Nagarpur Doptior Sitkibari 241. Tangail Nagarpur Mokna Mokna 242. Tangail Nagarpur Mukna Pong-Baratia 243. Tangail Nagarpur Varra Agdighulia 244. Tangail Nagarpur Varra Ata Para 245. Tangail Nagarpur Varra Chandok 246. Tangail Nagarpur Varra Khas Sahjani 247. Tangail Nagarpur Varra Marma 248. Tangail Tangail Sadar Hugra Chock Gopal 249. Tangail Tangail Sadar Hugra Picuria 250. Tangail Tangail Sadar Kakua Gopal Kewtil 251. Tangail Tangail Sadar Kakua Gopal Kewtil New

252. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katoli/Mahmud Nagar Bohuli

253. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katoli/Mahmud Nagar Dhul Char

254. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katuli Barobaria 255. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katuli Chalapakla 256. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katuli Eisa Pasa 257. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katuli Naher Gacha 258. Tangail Tangail Sadar Katuli Sonamaijal 259. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Balia Para 260. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Bir Boruha 261. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Chetulia 262. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Kukuria 263. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Makor Kol 264. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Nondi Boira 265. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Noya para 266. Tangail Tangail Sadar Mahmud Nagar Shoratail

chars livelihoods programme clp-2 districts: an ......chars livelihoods programme clp-2 districts:...

Documents