characterization of mr fluid using a novel mpdc viscometer technique
TRANSCRIPT
i
CHARACTERIZATION OF MR FLUID USING A NOVEL
MPDC VISCOMETER TECHNIQUE
A REPORT
submitted by
JEYA GANESH N.
in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
of
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
in
APPLIED MECHANICS
FLUID MECHANICS GROUP
DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED MECHANICS
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS
CHENNAI-600 036.
May 2009
ii
THESIS CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis titled CHARACTERIZATION OF MR FLUID USING
A NOVEL MPDC VISCOMETER TECHNIQUE submitted by JEYA GANESH N., Roll
no. AM07M004 to the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, for the award of the degree of
Master of Technology, is a bonafide record of the work done by him under my supervision,
during the academic session 2007-2009. The contents of this thesis, in full or in parts, have
not been submitted to any other Institute or University for the award of any degree or
diploma.
Place: Chennai
Dr. B.S.V. Patnaik
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Applied Mechanics
IIT-Madras, 600 036
M. S. Siva kumar
Professor
Dept. of Applied Mechanics
IIT-Madras, 600 036
Prof. K. Ramesh
Head of the Department
Dept. of Applied Mechanics
IIT-Madras, 600 036
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I express my deep sense of gratitude to Dr. B.S.V. Patnaik and Prof, M. S. Sivakumar for
their inspiring and inimitable guidance through thought provoking discussions and constant
encouragement throughout this project work. It was a great pleasure working under them and
I will take this memorable experience throughout my life. If they had not provided the kind of
freedom which they had extended then I would not have enjoyed accomplishing the project.
I express my sincere thanks to the Prof K. Ramesh, Head of Department for his excellent
support. I also would like to thank MEC members and other solid mechanics faculties support
and patience extended towards my work. It was only due to their periodic review and
criticism, the project work was shaped and has attended its final version.
I would like to thank Dr. Chandrasekaran for his valuable suggestions and motivation for
my project work. It was he who inspired me in the art of presentation which was really useful
in each and every stage of my work.
No experimental work can surface without the help of experts present in various
departments. I, in this juncture, would like to express my sincere thanks to Prof Ramachandra
Rao from Physics department for allowing me to use the DC electromagnet in his lab.
Without his support the final face would have just remained theoretical. I also like to thank
my friends Senthil and Krishnan from the physics department for introducing us to the lab
and helping in understanding those devices.
I thank my dear friend Maniprakash for his invaluable suggestions and his help during
MATLAB coding. The work of my other friend Venkateswara Rao is unquestionable as he
helped a lot during the initial stages. I would have faced lot more difficulty in the fabrication
of experimental set up had he was not there. The hard work exerted accomplishing the project
iv
would have gone in vain had it not properly documented and presented before others. I thank
my other friend Srinivasan for his help in this regard in various stages of the project.
Academic life in IITM would have been stressful without the comfort, confidence, and
consideration of friends who made my stay enjoyable. In this regard, I like to thank my
friends Jayabal, Kasimayan, Shajil, Muthukumaran, Elango, Jayavel, Srivatsan, France and
Raja.
I finally would like to thank my parents and brothers and sisters for their patience
extended towards me during entire graduate study. My parents blessings and wishes was a
great source of motivation throughout my stay in IITM. I would not have reached this height
without their nurturing and support extended to me in my early days.
v
ABSTRACT
The fact that viscosity of a Magneto-Rheological fluid (MR fluid) can be varied by the
application of a magnetic field implies that there exists a lot of scope for development of
applications in which such a control on viscosity can be exercised by the application of a
magnetic field. The first step towards realizing such tunable mechanisms in specific
applications is therefore the establishment of a database and a method for characterization of
initial viscosity and its variation with applied magnetic field. In this project, the coefficient of
viscosity and yield strength of a magneto-rheological fluid containing different
concentrations of ferro-magnetic particles in the chosen carrier fluid have been determined as
a function of varying magnetic fields. An improved unique inexpensive experimental set-up
has been designed, fabricated and utilized for the viscosity characterization of MR fluids.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................... III
ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ V
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................... VIII
NOTATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... XI
CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Magneto-Rheological Fluid .................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Types of Fluids ....................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Characterization of MR Fluids ................................................................................................ 3
1.4 The Present Study ................................................................................................................... 4
CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................................... 5
LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Interaction .............................................................................................................................. 5
2.2 Operational Modes ................................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Characterization of MR Fluid.................................................................................................. 6
2.4 Measurements on Non-Newtonian Fluids ................................................................................ 6
2.5 Conclusions from the Literature .............................................................................................. 7
2.6 Objective of Present Work ...................................................................................................... 7
2.7 Scope of the Work .................................................................................................................. 8
CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................................................... 9
PRELIMINARY WORK AND REVIEW ................................................................................................. 9
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9
3.1 MR Fluid Preparation ............................................................................................................. 9
3.1.1 Carrier Fluid ................................................................................................................... 9
3.1.2 Surfactant ..................................................................................................................... 10
3.1.3 Ferromagnetic Particles................................................................................................. 11
3.1.4 Preparation Procedure ................................................................................................... 12
3.2 An Overview Earlier of Experimental Work ......................................................................... 13
3.3 Description of MDCV Instrument ......................................................................................... 14
3.4 MDCV Testing Procedure..................................................................................................... 18
3.4 MDCV Formulation.............................................................................................................. 18
vii
3.5 MDCV Result Review .......................................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................................... 30
MASS AND PRESSURE –DETECTING CAPILLARY VISCOMETER (MPDCV) .................................... 30
4.1 Description of the Instrument ................................................................................................ 30
4.2 Testing procedure ................................................................................................................. 33
4.3 The Formulation ................................................................................................................... 35
4.3 The Formulation ................................................................................................................... 35
CHAPTER 5 .................................................................................................................................. 38
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................. 38
5.1 Test Result for Reference Fluids ........................................................................................... 38
CHAPTER 6 .................................................................................................................................. 49
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK ............................................................................................... 49
6.1 Summary and Conclusions .................................................................................................... 49
6.2 Future Work ......................................................................................................................... 50
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 51
APPENDIX ....................................................................................................................................... 53
1 MATLAB code ....................................................................................................................... 53
For MDCV Viscometer ......................................................................................................... 53
For MPDCV Viscometer ....................................................................................................... 57
2 Curve fitting results ................................................................................................................. 58
MDCV .................................................................................................................................. 58
MPDCV ................................................................................................................................ 60
3 Viscosity Table:....................................................................................................................... 62
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1-1 A demonstration illustrating the behavior of MR fluids with and without magnetic field. An
otherwise a simple near-Newtonian fluid with suspended particles tend to become an
anisotropic non-Newtonian plastic viscous fluid in the presence of a magnetic field. .......... 1
Fig. 1-2 Shear stress vs. shear strain rate for different types of fluids. The slope of these curves is
the viscosity of the fluid. Unlike the Newtonian and other simple fluids, the MR fluid
behavior is closer to plastic-viscous fluids generally termed Bingham plastic fluids. ............ 2
Fig. 2-1 The two basic operational modes of MR Devices, (a) Pressure driven flow mode – flow
occurs due to pressure difference, (b) Direct shear flow mode – flow occurs due to relative
motion between the plates [1] ........................................................................................... 6
Fig. 3-1 A micelle is an aggregate of particle and surfactant molecules that contain polar head and
non-polar tail [5] .............................................................................................................. 10
Fig. 3-3 Prepared MR fluid with different mass fractions ................................................................ 12
Fig. 3-2 SEM micrographs of carbonyl iron powder which shows irregular shape of iron particles and
the particle size is around 2- 10µm. .................................................................................. 12
Fig. 3-4 Schematic diagram of a MDCV ............................................................................................ 15
Fig. 3-5 Experimental setup of MDCV .............................................................................................. 15
Fig. 3-6 Front panel, acts as a user interface. The system response can be viewed online during
experiment in chart window. This enables the user to check other uncertainties during
experiments ..................................................................................................................... 16
Fig. 3-7 Block diagram of the virtual instrument. It shows the internal circuitry of the elements used
in the experiment. It helps to add necessary elements to filter the noise so that actual data
is obtained without any external disturbances. ................................................................. 17
Fig. 3-8 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Water by MDCV ........................................................................... 26
Fig. 3-9 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Water by MDCV ............................................................ 26
Fig. 3-10 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Water by MDCV .................................................................... 27
ix
Fig. 3-11 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Water by MDCV............................................. 27
Fig. 3-12 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Mineral oil by MDCV .................................................................. 28
Fig. 3-13 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Mineral oil by MDCV ................................................... 28
Fig. 3-14 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Mineral oil by MDCV ............................................................. 29
Fig. 3-15 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Mineral oil by MDCV...................................... 29
Fig. 4-1 Schematic diagram of the MPDCV. As can be seen, the tall falling tube in MDCV is dispensed
with and replaced by a simple cylinder with a pressure gauge attached to it. The load cell
measures the weight of the liquid collected. The spring is used for applying the force to
the piston to generate the required pressure. .................................................................. 31
Fig. 4-2 MPDCV Experimental Setup with Data accusation system .................................................. 32
Fig. 4-3 Variable Magnetic field DC Magnet power Supply controller and Magnetic flux density
Measurement (Gauss Meter) ............................................................................................ 32
Fig. 4-4 MPDCV Experimental Setup with DC Magnet...................................................................... 34
Fig. 5-1 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Water by MPDCV ......................................................................... 40
Fig. 5-2 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Water by MPDCV .......................................................... 40
Fig. 5-3 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Water by MPDCV .................................................................... 41
Fig. 5-4 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Water by MPDCV ............................................ 41
Fig. 5-5 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Mineral oil by MPDCV .................................................................. 42
Fig. 5-6 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Mineral oil by MPDCV ................................................... 42
Fig. 5-7 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Mineral oil by MPDCV ............................................................. 43
Fig. 5-8 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Mineral oil by MPDCV ..................................... 43
Fig. 5-9 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for corn flour with water by MPDCV ..................... 44
Fig. 5-10 Plot of Time Vs Mass for MRF by MPDCV .......................................................................... 46
x
Fig. 5-11 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for MRF by MPDCV ........................................................... 46
Fig. 5-12 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for MRF by MPDCV .................................................................... 47
Fig. 5-13 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for MRF by MPDCV ............................................. 47
Fig. 5-14 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for MRF under different Magnetic flux density by
MPDCV ............................................................................................................................. 48
Fig. 5-15 Plot of Magnetic flux density Vs Threshold Pressure for MRF by MPDCV........................... 48
xi
NOTATIONS
Nomenclature
- Capillary length (m)
m - Mass (kg)
- Mass flow rate (kg s_1)
n -power-law index (dimensionless)
P - Pressure (Pa)
Q - Volume flow rate (m3 s_1)
t - Time (s)
Greek symbols
- Density (kgm3)
- Capillary diameter (m)
- cylinder diameter (m)
-non-Newtonian viscosity (Pa s)
- Newtonian viscosity (Pa s)
xii
- shear rate (1/s)
- Shear stress (Pa)
Subscripts
- Capillary tube
- Entrance and exit
– Cylinder
- Wall
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 MAGNETO-RHEOLOGICAL FLUID
Magneto-rheological fluid (MR fluid) is a fluid made up of a carrier fluid with added
surfactants that holds in suspension micron-sized magnetically polarizable particles. The
viscosity of this fluid depends on the concentration of the suspended particles and varies
under the influence of a magnetic field. However, the purely concentration related influence
on viscosity weak compared to the strong influence of the magnetic field.
In the presence of a magnetic field, the suspended particles in the fluid tend to align in the
direction of the magnetic field. The particles so aligned restrict the flow of the fluid
perpendicular to the direction of alignment or direction of flux. This increases the viscous
resistance of fluid perpendicular to the direction of flux. The properties of the MR fluid under
the action of magnetic field are anisotropic and it behaves like a non-Newtonian fluid (See
Fig. 1-1) that shows a simple demonstration of the same). This controllable viscous nature of
the MR fluids offers immense scope in its use in smart applications [2].
Fig. 1-1 A demonstration illustrating the behavior of MR fluids with and without magnetic field. An otherwise a simple near-Newtonian fluid with suspended particles tend to become an anisotropic
non-Newtonian plastic viscous fluid in the presence of a magnetic field.
2
1.2 TYPES OF FLUIDS
Generally, for most of the fluids (like water) shear stress versus rate of strain curve is
linear and passes through the origin. The slope of the curve is known as viscosity. Fluids that
exhibit this behaviour have a constant viscosity value i.e. viscosity is independent of shear
rate of the fluid and these fluids are called Newtonian fluids.
For a non-Newtonian fluid, the relation between the shear stress and the strain rate is
nonlinear, i.e. viscosity is shear strain rate dependent (see Fig. 1-2). Therefore, a constant
viscosity cannot be defined for a non-Newtonian fluid.
In general, non-Newtonian fluid behavior is modeled by treating the fluid as a dilatants, a
pseudoplastic or a Bingham plastic fluid depending on the type of nonlinearity exhibited by
the fluid. Dilatant or shear thickening fluids are those whose viscosity increases with increase
in shear rate (Fig. 1-2). The dilatant effect occurs in a fluid-particle mixture when the liquid
fraction present in the mixture is much less than the solid fraction and is just enough to only
Fig. 1-2 Shear stress vs. shear strain rate for different types of fluids. The slope of these curves is the viscosity of the fluid. Unlike the Newtonian and other simple fluids, the MR fluid
behavior is closer to plastic-viscous fluids generally termed Bingham plastic fluids.
3
fill the gap between the major fraction solid particles. At low velocities, the liquid acts as a
lubricant, and the dilatant flows easily. At higher velocities, the liquid is unable to fill the
gaps created between particles, and friction greatly increases, causing an increase in
viscosity. This can readily be seen in the case of a mixture of cornstarch and water.
Psedoplastic or shear thinning fluids exhibit a behavior opposite to that of dilatant fluids.
The viscosity of shear thinning fluid decreases with the increase in the shear rate (Fig. 1-2).
Examples of such fluids are ketchup, whipped cream, blood, paint, and nail polish..
Some fluids remain solid until the applied pressure reaches a threshold value. They then
behave as Newtonian fluids. Such fluids are known as Bingham plastic named after Eugene
C. Bingham who first proposed a mathematical formulation to model its behaviour [6]. It is
the commonly used mathematical model for analysis of mud flow in offshore engineering,
and the handling of slurries.
In the presence of a magnetic field, MR fluid behaves like a viscoelastic solid till a
particular threshold pressure is reached after which it behaves like shear thinning fluid (see
Fig. 1-2). The threshold pressure and viscosity increase with applied magnetic field strength.
The threshold pressure and viscosity can be varied depending on the requirement by
controlling the magnetic field.
1.3 CHARACTERIZATION OF MR FLUIDS
The usefulness of magneto-rheological fluids lies in their ability to act as simple, quiet
and rapid response media between electronic controls and mechanical systems. In order to
exploit this useful feature of the MR fluids and for effective implementation of its use as a
medium in various applications it is necessary to establish a database that will help in
understanding the fluid behavior under various conditions. Such a database will ensure better
design of devices like magneto rheological actuator system using MR fluids. The primary
4
requirement for creating such a database is the preparation and characterization of MR fluids
by devising a reliable and reproducible method for measuring their viscosity under various
conditions including the application of a magnetic field.
1.4 THE PRESENT STUDY
In this work, a novel technique called the Mass and Pressure Detecting Capillary
Viscometer-(MPDCV) that is effective in characterizing the MR fluid is developed and
tested. The first cut results from the developed characterization system offers tremendous
scope for its use in MR fluid characterization. The ensuing chapters in this report that
describe the route adopted for such characterization of an MR fluid are organized as follows.
In Chapter 2, a review of existing literature is presented and the various techniques
adopted for measuring the viscosity of non-Newtonian fluid are analysed and their suitability
for characterization of an MR fluid examined. The reasons for the initial choice of MDCV
technique based on pressure driven mode together with the results of the initial attempt at
using the MDCV are presented, analysed in Chapter 3. It is shown in this chapter that the
MDCV technique is inadequate for a complete characterization of the MR fluid. In Chapter 4
the development of a novel technique (Mass and Pressure Detecting Capillary Viscometer-
MPDCV) that rectifies this fault and the fabrication of an apparatus based on this technique is
described. Results obtained by the use of this technique are presented in Chapter 5. The
results obtained are analyzed and are shown to be more reliable. The report ends with a
presentation of summary of the work and salient conclusions from the study in Chapter 6.
5
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTERACTION
The initial discovery and development of MR fluids and devices are to be attributed to
Jacob Rainbow at the US National Bureau of Standards in the late 1940s [1]. In spite of that,
real research efforts started only after 1991. While the commercial success of other smart
fluids remained elusive, MR fluids have performed better in that respect in recent times. A
number of MR fluids and various MR fluid- based systems have been commercialized
including an MR fluid brake for use in the exercise industry, a controllable MR fluid damper
for use in truck seat suspensions and an MR fluid shock absorber for oval track automobile
racing. The emphasis in the development of these devices has been more on the
characterization of the devices for various conditions of use rather than on the
characterization of the MR fluid used in these devices. A proper characterization of a MR
fluid has to take into account the operational modes of flow the fluid will be subjected to.
2.2 OPERATIONAL MODES
The two basic operational modes for MR fluid controllable devices are pressure driven
flow (PDF) and direct shear flow. Schematic diagrams illustrating these two basic
operational modes are shown in Fig. 2-1. Examples of pressure driven flow mode devices
include servo-valves, dampers and shock absorbers. Examples of direct-shear mode devices
include clutches, brakes, chucking and locking devices. A third mode of operation known as
squeeze-film mode has also been used in slow motion, high force applications (Jolly and
Carlson, 1996) [1].
6
2.3 CHARACTERIZATION OF MR FLUID
MR fluid behaviour has been examined by a few research workers. Jolly et.al [1] have
reported measured viscosity values for a MR fluid. However, neither its composition nor the
mode in which the measurement has been carried out have been specified. Foister[3] obtained
values for the viscosity and yield strength of a MR fluid treating it as a non-Newtonian
Bingham plastic fluid. However, sufficient data related to the characterization of MR fluids
in both modes is not available in open literature.
2.4 MEASUREMENTS ON NON-NEWTONIAN FLUIDS
Studying non-Newtonian rheological properties is quite a challenge and many research
works are being carried out. The commercial rheometer to characterize non-Newtonian fluids
costs around Rs. 35 Lakhs. Further the rheometer has to be modified to incorporate magnetic
field which may be difficult. It is also available only in shear driven flow mode and not in
pressure driven mode. Some literature work suggests techniques for testing non-Newtonian
fluids in pressure driven flow mode. One such technique was proposed by Yamasaki and
Irvine[4] who developed a comparative capillary tube viscometer to measure the viscous
properties of Newtonian and Power-law fluids. The flow in this technique is achieved by
constant external pressure source. And we need to contact some many trails for getting the
shear stress in different strain rate. The flow in this technique is achieved by gravitational
Fig. 2-1 The two basic operational modes of MR Devices, (a) Pressure driven flow mode – flow occurs due to pressure difference, (b) Direct shear flow mode – flow occurs due to
relative motion between the plates [1]
7
head. In order to get high strain rate, the pressure should be high which is difficult to achieve
in a gravity driven flow for high viscous fluids. Hence, it is difficult for this technique to be
implemented for Bingham and high viscous fluids. Another technique, mass-detecting
capillary viscometer (MDCV) was developed by Shin and Keum [5] for measuring viscosity
of non-Newtonian fluids for a wide range of viscosity and shear strain rate. However, the set
up has to under a major change even for one order variation in the magnitude of viscosity.
Besides, MDCV does not take care of sticking nature of MR fluid which can affect the
measuring of threshold pressure.
2.5 CONCLUSIONS FROM THE LITERATURE
The characterization of MR fluids is important for design and development of MR fluid
devices. Though the MR fluids can act in both the pressure driven flow mode and direct
shear flow mode, it is learnt from the literature that the characterization has been done
generally for the later mode. The behavior of MR fluids under pressure driven flow mode is
assumed to be the same as that of direct shear flow mode. However, there is no experimental
evidence to hold the above assumption. To the best of the knowledge of the author, the
expensive rheometers commercially available to characterize the behavior of non-Newtonian
fluids also measures only on direct shear flow mode.
2.6 OBJECTIVE OF PRESENT WORK
The objective, therefore, in this work is to prepare the magnetic rheological fluid with
different concentrations of micron sized Ferro-magnetic particles and to develop a simple
experimental setup to estimate and obtain the viscosity of MR fluids at different strain rates
under varying magnetic fields.
8
2.7 SCOPE OF THE WORK
To this effect, the following is set as the scope of the work
Preparation of the MR fluid using mineral oil and carbonyl particles with various
mass fractions using white lithium based grease as surfactants.
Design, development and fabrication of a simple instrument (viscometer) for the
characterization of MR fluid in a pressure driven mode under varying magnetic fields.
Validation of the developed viscometer on a well known Newtonian fluid for a broad
range of shear strain rate and viscosity.
Obtaining shear strain rate vs. shear stress behavior of MR fluids experimentally for
various magnetic flux densities using the developed viscometer
9
CHAPTER 3
PRELIMINARY WORK AND REVIEW
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter deals with preparation of MR fluids and design and fabrication of MDCV
technique. This technique was used for measuring the behavior of well known fluids for a
wide range of shear strain rate. The comparison on the results shows that this technique
requires certain modifications to yield the correct results.
3.1 MR FLUID PREPARATION
Magneto-rheological fluid consists of micron-sized magnetically polarizable particles,
carrier fluid and surfactants.
3.1.1 Carrier Fluid
Carrier fluid can be a any low viscous liquid. If high viscous oil is used the prepared MR
fluid will be like grease without magnetic field. The following fluids are generally used as
carrier fluids for preparing the MR fluid.
Petroleum based oils
Silicone oils
Mineral oils
Synthetic hydrocarbon oils
Mineral oil is used in as carrier fluid in the study due to its various advantages. Mineral
oil or liquid petroleum is a by-product in the distillation of petroleum to produce gasoline and
other petroleum based products from crude oil. It has a density of around 0.8 g/cm3.[6] It is
low-toxic, non-reactive general purpose lubricant and coolant. In addition to that its price is
low and found in abundance. Hence, mineral oil is chosen as carrier fluid.
10
3.1.2 Surfactant
In MF fluid Ferro-particles settle out of the suspension over time due to the inherent
density difference between the particles and their carrier fluid. The rate and degree to which
this occurs is one of the primary attributes considered in industry when implementing or
designing an MR device. Surfactants are typically used to offset this effect.
It is wetting agents that lower the surface tension of a liquid, allowing easier spreading,
and lower the interfacial tension between two liquids. Addition of a surfactant allows
micelles to form around the Ferro-particles. A micelle is an aggregate of surfactant
molecules. A surfactant has a polar head and non-polar tail (or vice versa), one of which
adsorbs to a particle, while the non-polar tail (or polar head) sticks out into the carrier
medium, forming an inverse or regular micelle, respectively, around the particle. This
increases the effective particle diameter.
Steric repulsion then prevents heavy agglomeration of the particles in their settled state,
which makes fluid remixing (particle redispersion) occur far faster and with less effort. For
example, magnetorheological dampers will remix within one cycle with a surfactant additive,
but are nearly impossible to remix without them. Surfactants are useful in prolonging the
Fig. 3-1 A micelle is an aggregate of particle and surfactant molecules that contain polar head and non-polar tail [6]
Non-Polar tail
Polar head
Carrier
medium
11
settling rate in MR fluids. The generally used Surfactants for the preparation of MR fluid are
as follows.
Oleic acid
Tetramethylammonium hydroxide
citric acid
soy lecithin
white lithium based grease
3.1.3 Ferromagnetic Particles
Cobalt, Ferrite, Nickel, iron are ferromagnetic materials. Iron is one among very cheap
and fine particles can be easily produced by powdering it.
The various types of iron particles such as carbonyl iron, stainless steel flakes, hydrogen
reduced iron and magnetic iron oxide can be used for the preparation of MR fluid. Carbonyl
iron powder is the most popular choice for use in MR fluids
Carbonyl iron is a highly pure iron, prepared by chemical decomposition of purified iron
pentacarbonyl. It usually has the appearance of grey powder, composed of spherical
microparticles. Among the filler particles iron has one of the highest saturation magnetization
values of metallic elements with saturation magnetic field around 2.1Tesla. Permeability is a
material property that describes the ease with which a magnetic flux is established in a
component. And this permeability is large in iron. The magnetic induction that remains in a
material after removal of the magnetizing field is called remenant effect. This remenant effect
is low in the carbonyl iron particles. Due to high permeability and saturation magnetization
attraction between the filler particles will be large and thereby a high viscosity change is
possible. The need for low remanent magnetization is that the particles do not stick together
when the magnetic field is turned off. Therefore they will make the viscosity change
reversible which is a problem with highly remanent particles. Fig. 3.1 shows the SEM
12
micrographs of carbonyl iron particles taken from SEM FEI QUANTA 200. This shows that
approximately the particle size ranges from 2µm to 10µm with irregular shape.
3.1.4 Preparation Procedure
For the present work, micronsized magnetically polarizable Carbonyl iron particles are
considered. Mineral oil is used as a carrier fluid and lithium based Grease is used as a surface
acting agent. The amount of iron particles and the quantity of grease and oil to be mixed is
decided based on the desired properties of MR Fluid.
Fig. 3-3 Prepared MR fluid with different mass fractions
First, mix the grease and oil thoroughly. Mixing is most effectively accomplished with a
high-speed rotary mixer. Finally, add the iron powder to the oil and grease mixture. Start by
adding about half of the iron powder. You will need to use a stirring stick to get the dry iron
powder to mix with liquid. Once the mixture appears to be relatively uniform and no dry iron
Fig. 3-2 SEM micrographs of carbonyl iron powder which shows irregular shape of iron particles and the particle size is around 2- 10µm.
13
powder is visible, add the remainder of the iron powder and continue to stir. Continue to stir
with the stick until the mixture appears uniform without lumps. At this point you can
continue mix using the electric stirrer.
3.2 AN OVERVIEW EARLIER OF EXPERIMENTAL WORK
In order to measure the non-Newtonian behavior completely, its viscosity for various
shear strain rates can be obtained from relation between the shear stress and the shear strain
rate. The only possible way to achieve variable shear strain rate in a pressure driven flow
mode is by varying the pressure at source. This is achieved in MDCV. The set-up is
fabricated with the property ranges of MR fluid as constraints which is listed by Jolly et.al
and Foister (1997). [1] [2].
Density range (2700 Kg/m3 to 3500 Kg/m
3)
Viscosity range (.5 to 25 Ns/m2) or (5 to 250 Poise)
The effective magnetic field about 0.2 to 0.3 Tesla (N/m A)
Yield stress range (.5 to 1.5 k Pa).
The MDCV technique using capillary tube for viscosity measurements of both Newtonian
and non-Newtonian fluids over a range of shear rates was developed by Shin and Keum
(2003).[5]. The viscosity of any fluid at any instant can be found out by knowing the Flow
rate and pressure drop at that instant. In MDCV, the viscosity can be calculated just with a
measurement of liquid-mass variation with time. Using a precision balance, one can measure
the variation of fluid mass collected, m (t), from which the test fluid viscosity and shear rate
are mathematically calculated. The feasibility and accuracy of the mass-detecting technique
have been demonstrated for water and non-Newtonian fluids by comparing results against
established viscosity measurement techniques. The advantages of this design are simplicity
(i.e., ease of operation and no moving parts) low cost, and the ability to measure viscosity
14
over a relatively broad range of shear rates. The apparatus constructed based on the technique
is explained next section.
3.3 DESCRIPTION OF MDCV INSTRUMENT
Fig. 3-4 is a schematic diagram of a Mass Detection Capillary Viscometer, which consists
of a falling tube, capillary tube, receptacle, load cell, and computer data acquisition system.
The inside diameter of the falling tube was 9.05 mm. The inside diameter and length
of the capillary tube were 1.9 mm and 108.8 mm, respectively. The diameter and length
of the capillary tube were chosen to ensure that the friction loss in the capillary tube was
significantly greater than the loss in the other parts of the system (Cho et al.,1999) [7].
Energy losses at the end of a capillary are small due to fluid divergence in the original
technique and usually neglected but entrance losses can be very significant (Dervisoglu &
Kokini, 1986; Steffe, 1992) [8] [9]. In the fabricated set-up, the divergence portion is
removed but the exit losses and entrance losses were considered in the energy equation using
standard data available in Corvalis Forest Research Community [10]. This allows the easy
fabrication of set-up with a very little loss in accuracy.
In this setup, capillary end effects were accounted for during data reduction analysis by
adjusting the values of the length of the capillary tube. In addition, the capillary tube
dimensions were designed to finish one test with test fluid within few minutes.
15
Fig. 3-5 Experimental setup of MDCV
Fig. 3-4 Schematic diagram of a MDCV
16
The essential feature in a MDCV is the use of precision load cell to measure the fluid
collected in the receptacle for every 0.01 s with a resolution of 0.1 g. The instantaneous fluid
weights are recorded in a computer data file with an analog-to-digital data acquisition system
(National Instruments) with respect to time using Labview.
LabVIEW (Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Engineering Workbench) is a platform
and development environment for a visual programming language from National Instruments
for data acquisition, instrument control, and industrial automation on a variety of platforms
including Microsoft Windows, various flavors of UNIX, Linux, and Mac OS.
Fig. 3-6 Front panel, acts as a user interface. The system response can be viewed online during experiment in chart window. This enables the user to check other uncertainties during experiments
17
Fig. 3-7 Block diagram of the virtual instrument. It shows the internal circuitry of the elements used in the experiment. It helps to add necessary elements to filter the noise so that actual data is obtained without any external disturbances.
Fig. 3-6 & Fig. 3-7 shows the front panel and block diagram of the virtual instrument
programmed using LabVIEW which is used to do the data acquisition. Various filters such as
DC filter, high pass filter, low pass filter, band pass filter, and band stop filter were studied in
order to remove the noise from the load cell. From this study the DC filter is chosen such that
the noise is less compare to the other filters.
18
3.4 MDCV TESTING PROCEDURE
Typical tests are conducted as follows: First, fill up the test fluid in the falling tube so that
the initial height of the fluid in the falling tube reaches a preset position. Once this condition
is achieved, start the test. At time t = 0, the data acquisition system is enabled and the falling
tube is opened to atmosphere, allowing the fluid to flow through the capillary and to be
collected in the receptacle as driven by the gravity head. When the fluid level in the falling
tube approaches the bottom of the falling tube, the test fluid stops flowing. Typically, it took
~1 min for the fluid level in the falling tube to reach an asymptote with water. The time to
complete a run should vary depending on type of liquid and size of the falling and capillary
tubes. If a larger-diameter falling tube is used, a longer run time is required. Nonetheless,
using a falling tube with a larger diameter resulted in more accurate data.
3.4 MDCV FORMULATION
The fluid mass data from the receptacle were analyzed in the following way to determine
the viscosity of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. The mathematical equation of the flow
analysis began with the equation of the conservation of energy between cylinder and the
capillary exit. Assuming a quasi-steady flow behavior, one may write the governing
equations as follows
(1)
where is the static pressure, is the density of the test fluid, is the fluid velocity, is
the acceleration due to gravity, is the fluid level, is the pressure drop across the
19
capillary tube, is the pressure drop occurring at the entrance and exit of the capillary tube
and the subscripts 1 and 2 are at the falling tube and capillary tube exit, respectively. The
third term on the right hand side of Eq. (1) represents the residue height of the falling tube at
due to the surface tension effect.
With this experimental set-up, the pressure drop ( ) caused by secondary flow patterns
or eddies in the entrance and exit of the capillary tube may appear to be significant in a high
shear zone. One of the most accurate methods for determining is to make a Bagley plot
with at least two short capillaries of the same diameter (Middleman, 1968; Macosko, 1993)
[12] [11]. It turned out that the contribution from the second term on the right hand side of
Eq. (1) is negligibly small for relatively low viscosity fluids. However, the entrance effect
must be considered and corrected for viscosity measurements for relatively high viscosity
fluids. The detail correction method for the entrance effect can be found elsewhere (Steffe,
1992) [9]. Furthermore, effects of wall slip should be considered and corrected in viscosity
measurement of particle suspensions (Kokini & Dervisoglu, 1990; Adhikari & Jindal, 2001)
[14] [13]. This effect can be particularly important for highly concentrated suspensions and
higher shear rate measurements. However, for low concentrated suspensions and low shear
rate measurements including the present measurement, the slip effect can be assumed as
negligibly small (Macosko, 1993) [11].
In the fabricated set up the capillary end is left free for the reason mentioned in section
3.2. Hence the exit losses and entrance losses were considered in the energy equation using
20
standard datas available in Corvalis Forest Research Community [10]. This loss is expressed
as the velocity head reduced by a factor known as the entrance and exit head loss coefficient.
The summation of both the losses is considered in energy equation as Ke. The entrance loss
coefficient is chosen based on the nature of projected end of the tube which is square cut in
our case. The corresponding value for projected square end is 0.5 and the exit loss coefficient
is 1. The summation of the coefficient (Ke) is 1.5.
(2)
Since (static ambient pressure), and , Eq. (1) can be simplified as
where is the initial fluid level at , is the final fluid level at and
is the fluid level difference between and . In addition, Eq. (3) can be expressed as a
function of fluid mass collected in the receptacle as follows:
(4)
= (3)
21
where is the fluid mass at and is the fluid mass at . It is of note that
the volume flow rate is proportional to the rate of change of the mass of the fluid collected on
the load cell. Hence, the corresponding flow rate in the capillary tube can be expressed as
The shear rate dependent viscosity for a non-Newtonian fluid flowing in the capillary
tube is obtained from experimental data with some mathematical treatment; the necessary
equations can be found in any standard handbooks (Macosko, 1993) [11].
The shear rate at the capillary tube wall is obtained from the classic Weissenberg–
Rabinowitsch equation (Macosko, 1993) [11],
(6)
where is the apparent or Newtonian shear rate at the wall.
(7)
The shear stress at the wall is given by
(8)
(5)
22
Thus, the viscosity corresponding to the wall shear rate is calculated in the form of a
generalised Newtonian viscosity:
(9)
(10)
If there is enough data near the point of interest, it is possible to evaluate the
derivative , where n is simply the exponent of the power-law constitutive equation.
The typical number of data points in a MPDCV is about 10,000 over a range of shear rates.
Even though the power-law exponent is used in the above equations, this does not limit
the capability of the present measurement for power-law fluids. This rigorous approach can
still be taken to obtain a viscosity versus shear rate relationship for any fluid (Macosko, 1993)
[11]. Thus, Eq. (10) can be described in terms of the mass measured in the MDCV as follows:
(11)
23
The viscosity versus shear rate information can be obtained from Eqs. (4) to (12) by
measuring the mass of the collected fluid with respect to time, from which flow rate can be
calculated. The values of and must be obtained by calibration.
24
3.5 MDCV RESULT REVIEW
In order to implement the MDCV technique for finding viscosity of MR fluid, initial
experiments were conducted with water and mineral oil to know the advantages and
limitations of the technique. It is well known that the viscosity range of MR fluid is wide. In
order to know the limitations of the technique for wide ranges two fluids of viscosity of
different order of magnitude can be used for experiments. Water and Mineral oil was chosen
based on this criteria. The results for water and mineral oil are discussed below.
The only data to be measured from the experimenmt is mass collected in the basin. The
mass collected as a function of time is shown in Fig. 3-8. The collected data cannot be used
directly to calculate the massflow rate due to the effect of noise. The mass flow rate can be
calculated by calculating the derivative of the mass vs time data. The presence of even less
noise amplifies the error while calculating derivative. Hence derivative is claculated after
curve fitting. The Mass flow rate calculated from the curve fitted data is shown in Fig. 3-9.
The pressure Vs time obtained from the curve fitted data is shown in Fig. 3-10. The mass
flow rate and the Pressure is used to calculate the shear strain rate and shear stress as
explained in section. The obtained shear strain rate and shear stress data is plotted in Fig.
3-11.
Many things can be concluded from the results obtained. First, compare the mass
collected vs time plot for water and mineral oil. It was observed that curve fitting is difficult
for water whereas it was much more accurate for mineral oil. It tends to conclude that the
setup can be more accurate for viscosity of order of 0.01Nsm-2. Now, compare the shear
strain rate vs shear stress plot for both fluids. The same is reflected in terms of accuracy i.e.
mineral oil plots look exactly linear whereas the plot for water shows more irregularities.
Also observe that the range of shear strain rate obtained for water is of the order of 1000
whereas the one obtained for mineral oils is of the order of 100s. In order to perform
25
experiments on MR fluid we need to test not only for the varying order of viscosity but also
for wide range of shear strain rates. In order to achieve both throught the setup, falling tube
and capillary tube arrangements of various dimension range should be used. This asks for
falling tube of more than 1m in order to test high viscous fluids in high shear strain rates.
This is tedious, impractical and unnecessary. Hence a new technique is formulated
incorporating both the needs.
26
Fig. 3-8 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Water by MDCV
Fig. 3-9 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Water by MDCV
27
Fig. 3-10 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Water by MDCV
Fig. 3-11 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Water by MDCV
28
Fig. 3-12 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Mineral oil by MDCV
Fig. 3-13 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Mineral oil by MDCV
29
Fig. 3-14 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Mineral oil by MDCV
Fig. 3-15 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Mineral oil by MDCV
30
CHAPTER 4
MASS AND PRESSURE –DETECTING CAPILLARY
VISCOMETER (MPDCV)
To perform experiments on MR fluid with the varying order of viscosity and also for
wide range of shear strain rates the MDCV setup is modified. The falling tube is replaced by
spring, piston and cylinder arrangment for testing the high viscous fluids in high shear strain
rates. This alleviates the problem of using a tall falling tube and in achieving a compact
setup. The pressure sensor is used for measuring the pressure in the cylinder. The mass
collected in the basin with respect to time is measured as similar as done in MDCV. This
setup will, henceforth, be called mass and pressure detecting capillary viscometer (MPDCV).
In this chapter, the development of the MPDCV instrument is first described before
evolving at a test procedure to test the MR fluids.
4.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Fig. 4.1 is a schematic diagram of a Mass and Pressure Detection Capillary Viscometer,
which consists of a piston cylinder arrangement, compression spring, and capillary tube, glass
adapter, receptacle, load cell and computer data acquisition system. The inside diameter of
the piston cylinder is 30 mm. Two different capillary tubes are used to cater to the wide range
of strain rates: one capillary tube has inside diameter and length of 1.8mm and 132.2mm
respectively while the other has 3 mm and 105 mm, respectively. Fig. 4-2 shows a
photograph of the viscometer.
The required magnetic field is applied using variable magnetic flux density DC
electromagnet device. The variable magnetic field is achieved by controlling the current
supply to the variable DC source provided. The applied magnetic field is measured using a
Gauss meter.
31
The capillary tube, piston cylinder arrangement, compression spring dimensions are
designed so that the test could be carried out within a few minutes. The essential feature of
the MPDCV is the use of precision mass balance to measure the fluid collected in the
receptacle and the introduction of the pressure sensor to measure the cylinder pressure every
0.01seconds with a resolution of 0.1grams and 0.01kPa respectively. The instantaneous fluid
weights and pressure are recorded in a computer data file using an analog-to-digital data
acquisition system (National Instruments) with respect to time using Labview software.
Fig. 4-1 Schematic diagram of the MPDCV. As can be seen, the tall falling tube in MDCV is dispensed with and replaced by a simple cylinder with a pressure gauge attached to it. The load cell measures the weight of the liquid collected. The spring is used for applying the force to the piston to generate the required pressure.
32
Fig. 4-2 MPDCV Experimental Setup with Data accusation system
Fig. 4-3 Variable Magnetic field DC Magnet power Supply controller and Magnetic flux density Measurement (Gauss Meter)
33
4.2 TESTING PROCEDURE
Typical tests are conducted as follows: The piston cylinder arrangement sucks up the test
fluid from the reservoir when piston is lifted up. The lead screw lever attached to the spring
rod which in-turn connected to the piston is rotated to lift the piston. This also compresses the
spring in the spring rod. The spring rod is held in a position by the use of a dog clutch. The
dog clutch is released to apply the load on the piston by the released compression spring. At
time t =0, the data acquisition system is enabled and cylinder inlet is closed, the capillary tube
exit is opened to atmosphere, allowing the fluid to flow through the capillary and to be
collected in the receptacle as driven by the compression spring . When the piston in the
cylinder approaches the bottom of the cylinder, the test fluid stops flowing. Typically, it took
few min for the piston in the cylinder to reach an asymptote. The time to complete a run
should vary depending on type of liquid and size of the cylinder and capillary tubes. If a
larger-diameter the cylinder is used, a longer run time is required. Fig. 4.3 shows the
variable magnetic field DC magnet power Supply controller and the magnetic flux density
measurement meter – the Gauss meter. The entire setup with the DC magnet is shown in Fig.
4.4.
34
Fig. 4-4 MPDCV Experimental Setup with DC Magnet
35
4.3 THE FORMULATION
The mathematical model of the flow analysis began with the equation of the conservation
of energy between cylinder (1) and the capillary exit (2). Assuming a quasi-steady flow
behavior, one may write the governing equation as follows
(12)
The assumptions for wall slip effect, entrance and exit loss are similar to that followed in
MDCV as explained in Chapter 3. In the fabricated set up the capillary end is left free similar
to MDCV. The value for projected square end is 0.5 and the exit loss coefficient is 1. The
summation of the coefficient (Ke) is 1.5.
Since cylinder and static ambient pressure), and , Eq. (12) can be
simplified as Eq. (1) can be simplified as
(13)
is equal to the pressure measured in pressure sensor in the experiment. It is of
note that the volume flow rate is proportional to the rate of change of the mass of the fluid
collected on the load cell. Hence, the corresponding flow rate in the capillary tube can be
expressed as
The shear rate dependent viscosity for a non-Newtonian fluid flowing in the capillary
tube is obtained from experimental data with some mathematical treatment; the necessary
equations can be found in any standard handbooks.
(14)
36
The shear rate at the capillary tube wall is obtained from the classic Weissenberg–
Rabinowitsch equation (James F. Steffe ,1996) [19] ,
(15)
where is the apparent or Newtonian shear rate at the wall.
(16)
The shear stress at the wall is given by
(17)
Thus, the viscosity corresponding to the wall shear rate is calculated in the form of a
generalised Newtonian viscosity:
(18)
(19)
The viscosity versus shear rate information can be obtained from Eqs. (13) to (19) by
measuring the pressure and mass of the collected fluid with respect to time, from which flow
37
rate and pressure drop in capillary can be calculated. The values of and must be
obtained by calibration.
In MPDCV, the relation between the apparent shear strain rate and shear stress behavior
need not be modeled as in the case of MDCV. The actual (non-Newtonian) shear strain rate
can be obtained directly using the Weissenberg–Rabinowitsch equation (15).
38
CHAPTER 5
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5.1 TEST RESULT FOR REFERENCE FLUIDS
In order to verify the MPDCV technique for finding viscosity of MR fluid, initial
experiments were conducted with water and mineral oil to know the advantages and
limitations of the technique. Water and Mineral oil was chosen based on the criteria that
fluids of varoius order of magnitude of viscosity should be tested. The results for water and
mineral oil are discussed below.
The data to be measured from the experimenmt is mass collected in the basin and the
pressure inside the piston cylinder. The mass collected as a function of time is hown in Fig.
5-1. The collected data cannot be used directly to calculate the massflow rate due to the effect
of noise. The mass flow rate can be calculated by calculating the derivative of the mass vs
time data. The presence of even less noise amplifies the error while calculating derivative.
Hence derivative is claculated after curve fitting. The Mass flow rate calculated from the
curve fitted data is shown in Fig. The pressure Vs time obtained from the experiment is curve
fitted data to minimise the effect of noise. The original and curve fitted data is shown in Fig.
5-3. The mass flow rate and the Pressure is used to calculate the shear strain rate and shear
stress as explained in section 4.4. The obtained shear strain rate and shear stress data is
plotted in Fig. 5-4.
Many things can be concluded from the results obtained. First, compare the mass
collected vs time plot for water and mineral oil shown in Fig. 5-1 & Fig. 5-5. Many analysis
on curve fitting was carrie out and it was found that exponential and polynomial fit was found
to be more accurate. The same is seen in shear strain rate vs shear stress plot shown in Fig.
5-4& Fig. 5-8. Now apart from the accuracy of the curve fitting also observe the range of
39
shear strain rate in Fig. 5-4& Fig. 5-8. The range of shear strain rate that can be obtained in
this technique for mineral oil was 12000 when compared to 700 in MDCV as shown in Fig.
3-15. Hence huge range of strain rate can be achieved in this technique without loss of
accuracy. Initial comparison of strain rate vs shear stress plot for water in Fig. 5-4 & Fig.
3-11 for MPDCV & MDCV respectively tends to conclude that vast range of strain rate may
not be obtained for lower viscous fluids in MPDCV as strain rate obtained in the MPDCV
was only 2500 whereas it was 7000 for MDCV. It is to be noted here that this less range is
only due to the constraint in the spring used rather than in the technique. If the stiffness of the
spring in the set-up was varied then more strain rate than it could be imagined could have
been obtained. It was not attempted only due to the lack of time and certain facilities.
Hence, it is now proved that the technique is quite accurate for vast range of shear rates as
well as for various order of magnitude of viscosity. Therefore, experiments were conducted
in this technique for MRF.
40
Fig. 5-1 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Water by MPDCV
Fig. 5-2 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Water by MPDCV
41
Fig. 5-3 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Water by MPDCV
Fig. 5-4 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Water by MPDCV
42
Fig. 5-5 Plot of Time Vs Mass for Mineral oil by MPDCV
Fig. 5-6 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for Mineral oil by MPDCV
43
Fig. 5-7 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for Mineral oil by MPDCV
Fig. 5-8 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for Mineral oil by MPDCV
44
Fig. 5-9 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for corn flour with water by MPDCV
Corn flour with water colloidal is chosen for validating MPDCV for measuring non
Newtonian behavior. First, apparent shear strain rate and shear stress is calculated from basic
equations. Then, using Weissenberg–Rabinowitsch equation, actual (non Newtonian) shear
strain rate is calculated with and without using power law model. The obtained shear strain
rate and shear stress data is plotted in Fig. 5-9.In this Fig. 5-9 the power law model is
perfectly fitted in experimental data. The actual (non Newtonian) shear strain rate vs. shear
stress curve for with and without using power law model are similar.
45
5.2 TEST Result for MR Fluids
The experiments for MRF were conducted in two phases. In the first phase, shear stress
vs. shear strain plot was obtained without applying magnetic field. In the second phase, the
same was obtained with the application of magnetic field. The procedure is same as followed
for water and mineral oil. The shear stress vs. shear strain plot obtained in the experiment for
various magnetic flux density is shown in . The nature of variation of threshold pressure with
magnetic field is shown in Fig. 5-15.
The nature of variation of viscosity with magnetic field can be obtained from the slope of
the curve in Fig. 5-14. The magnetic field applied for experiment is 0, 100, 200, 300 & 400
Gauss. The behaviour of MRF with magnetic field, as reported in the literature, is non-
Newtonian. It can be seen that the shear stress vs. shear strain plot shown in Fig. 5-13 is
almost linear. The much acclaimed non-Newtonian behavior is not obtained in the range in
which the experiment is conducted. But, if the behavior is observed only in very low strain
rates (0-250) then the plot is non linear.
Further, it can be seen that there is no threshold pressure when no magnetic field is
applied. The threshold pressure is slightly increased at 100 Gauss. Though the plot is linear it
intersects with that of 0 Gauss. It shows that the viscosity is decreased at 100 gauss than at 0
Gauss. The plot for 200 Gauss is almost parallel to that 0 Gauss with a high threshold
pressure. The plot for 300 Gauss and 400 Gauss are having high slopes and the slope is
increasing with increase in magnetic flux density. Thus, it can be concluded that viscosity is
increasing with increase in magnetic field. The variation of threshold pressure with magnetic
field is shown in Fig. 5-15 . It can be seen that till 100 Gauss there not much increase in
threshold pressure whereas after that the increase is steady and linear. It is also visible in
shear strain rate vs shear stress plot shown in Fig. 5-14.
46
Fig. 5-10 Plot of Time Vs Mass for MRF by MPDCV
Fig. 5-11 Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate for MRF by MPDCV
47
Fig. 5-12 Plot of Time Vs Pressure for MRF by MPDCV
Fig. 5-13 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for MRF by MPDCV
48
Fig. 5-14 Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress for MRF under different Magnetic flux density by MPDCV
Fig. 5-15 Plot of Magnetic flux density Vs Threshold Pressure for MRF by MPDCV
49
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
6.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A literature review on the existing techniques for characterization of MR fluids was done.
From the literature, it was found that the experimental set up presently available are based on
direct shear flow mode. It was also learnt that no experimental set up is available for
measuring the viscosity of MR fluids under pressure driven flow mode. With that being the
motivation, an attempt was made to design and develop an instrument with a simple
technique for the same purpose. In that direction, initially one existing non-Newtonian fluid
measuring technique (MDCV) was fabricated and used to measure the response of standard
fluids. During the validation process, many difficulties were realized with MDCV. One such
difficulty is the requirement to modify the set up for variation in the viscosity of the
measuring fluid. Another difficulty experienced was the inefficiency of MDCV in measuring
the threshold pressure due to sticking nature of MR fluid.
To overcome those difficulties, a new technique named “Mass and Pressure Detecting
Capillary Viscometer” (MPDCV) was proposed in this work. The developed instrument was
first tested with a well known fluid to obtain the relationship between shear strain rate and
shear stress for a wide range of shear strain rate under pressure driven flow mode. The
obtained experimental results using the new instrument were well comparable with standard
results. Gaining confidence out of this, the instrument was then used for measuring the
response of MR fluids under pressure driven mode for a various magnetic flux densities. MR
fluids with various mass fractions using lithium based grease as surfactants was prepared and
used for validation of the proposed technique. Wide range of shear strain rates was achieved
for various magnitude of viscosity of MR fluids with the proposed MPDCV. Actual data
50
obtained from the experiments was curve fitted with high accuracy for further understanding
and improvement of the technique. The threshold pressure of the fluid was only marginal till
100 Gauss whereas it increases steadily after that. With varying magnetic field, the viscosity
was also found to be increasing. The reason for the observed Newtonian behavior of MR
fluid is also explained. From the above results, it is opined here that the proposed technique
may be attempted for any non-Newtonian fluid.
6.2 FUTURE WORK
It is to be noted that the experiment was not conducted for higher magnetic fields due to
the limitations in the existing facilities. Hence, an attempt can be made to perform the
experiments discussed in this work for higher magnetic fields to estimate the capability of the
proposed technique. The experiment can also be conducted for various proportions and
shapes of Ferro-magnetic particles in MR fluids. Since the proposed technique is not limited
to MR fluid alone, it can be tested for any other non-Newtonian fluids.
51
REFERENCES
1. Mark R. Jolly, Jonathan W. Bender, and J. David Carlson ”Properties and Applications of
Commercial Magnetorheological Fluids” Thomas Lord Research Center, Lord Corporation
2. Cvbbgkn df J.C. Ulicny, D. J. Klingenberg, D. Kittipoomwong, M. A. Golden, A. L. Smith, C.S.
Namuduri and Z.Sun, (2008) “Modeling of MR Fluids and Devices,” eds. S.M.Sivakumar, V.
Buravalla and A.R.Srinivasa, Smart Devices: Modeling of Material Systems, Amer. Inst. of Physics, CP
1029, pp. 127-139.
3. Foister,R.T.,(1997),”Magnetorheological Fluids,” US Patent 5,667,715
4. Tadao Yamasaki,Thomas F. Irvine (1990) “A Comparative Capillary Tube Viscometer to Measure
the Viscous Properties of Newtonian and Power-Law Fluids” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
1990; 3:458-462
5. Sehyun Shin and Do-Young Keum (2003 )„Viscosity measurement of non-Newtonian fluid foods with
a mass-detecting capillary viscometer‟ Journal of Food Engineering, 58, pp.5–10.
6. http://www.wikipedia.org/
7. Cho, Y. I., Kim, W. T., & Kensey, K. R. (1999). “A new scanning capillary tube viscometer”. Review
of Scientific Instruments, 70(5), 2421–2423.
8. C Dervisoglu, M., & Kokini, J. L. (1986). “Steady shear rheology and fluid mechanics of four semi-
solid foods”. Journal of Food Science, 51(3), 541–546, 625.
9. D Steffe, J. F. (1992).” Rheological methods in food process engineering”. Michigan: Freeman Press.
10. http://www.fsl.orst.edu/geowater/FX3/help/7_Culvert_Basics/Entrance_Loss_Coefficient.htm as on 04-
11-2008
11. G Macosko,C.W.(1993). “Rheology principles measurements andapplications”. New
York:VCH(Chapter 6).
12. Middleman, S. (1968). “The flow of high polymers”. New York: Interscience.
13. Adhikari, B., & Jindal, V. K. (2001). “Fluid flow of characterization with tube viscometer data”.
Journal of Food Engineering, 50, 229–234,
52
14. Kokini, J. L., & Dervisoglu, M. (1990). “Wall effects in the laminar pipe flow of four semi-solid
foods”. Journal of Food Engineering, 11(1), 29–42.
15. http://home.fnal.gov/~randy/tech_specs.html as on 29.03.09
16. Sung Taek Lim, Min Seong Cho, In Bae Jang, Hyoung Jin Choi (2004) “Magnetorheological
characterization of carbonyl iron based suspension stabilized by fumed silica” Journal of Magnetism
and Magnetic Materials 282, 170–173.
17. A. Roszkowski, M. Bogdan, W. Skoczynski1, B. Marek (2008)” Testing Viscosity of MR Fluid in
Magnetic Field” Measurement Science Review, Volume 8, Section 3, No.3.
18. Fernando D. Goncalves, Jeong-Hoi Koo and Mehdi Ahmadian (2006 )“A review of the state of the
Art in Magnetorheological Fluid Technologies-Part I: MR fluid and MR fluid models ” The Shock and
Vibration Digest,Vol.38,No.3.
19. James F. Steffe (1996) “Rheological processes in food process engineering” Book.
53
APPENDIX
1 MATLAB CODE
For MDCV Viscometer
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% For Mineral Oil
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
load Sheet1.txt
t=Sheet1(:,1);
x=Sheet1(:,2);
cftool;
dn=840;
dc=0.0019;
Lc=0.1088;
df=0.00905;
%Using cftool find out best fit for mass vs. time plot
%Using fitted mass date find out mass flow rate(mdt1) and pressure(pr1)
%Give final mass(mif)
mif=------;
pr1=(4*9.81/(3.1416*df^2))*(mif-m);
sr=(32*mdt1/(dn*3.1415*dc^3));
st=((pr1-(1.5*dn*(sr*dc/8).^2/2))*dc/(4*Lc));
plot (sr,st);
54
% Plot of Time Vs Mass
plot (t,x);
hold on;
plot (t,m,'r');
% xlim([0 10]);
ylim([0 .02]);
xlabel('Time in sec');
ylabel('Mass in Kg');
title('Plot of Time Vs Mass');
h = legend('act','exp fit',2);
grid on;
saveas(gcf,'Plot of Time Vs Mass.tif')
hold off
% Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate
plot (t,mdt1);
% ylim([0 .02]);
xlabel('Time in sec');
ylabel('Mass flow rate in Kg/sec');
title('Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate');
grid on;
saveas(gcf,'Plot of Time Vs Mass flow rate.tif')
hold off
% Plot of Time Vs Pressure
55
plot (t,pr1);
% xlim([0 10]);
ylim([0 3000]);
xlabel('Time in sec');
ylabel('Pressure in Pa');
title('Plot of Time Vs Pressure');
% h = legend('act','exp fit',2);
grid on;
saveas(gcf,'Plot of Time Vs Pressure.tif')
hold off
%Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress
plot (sr,st);
hold on;
plot (srsst(:,1),srsst(:,2),'r');
% xlim([0 10]);
ylim([0 10]);
xlabel('Shear strain rate in 1/s');
ylabel('Shear stress in Pa');
title('Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress');
h = legend('act','lin fit',2);
grid on;
saveas(gcf,'Plot of Shear strain rate Vs Shear stress.tif')
56
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% For Water
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
load Sheet1.txt
t=Sheet1(:,1);
x=Sheet1(:,2);
cftool;
dn=1000;
dc=0.0019;
Lc=0.1088;
df=0.00905;
%Using cftool find out best fit for mass vs. time plot
%Using fitted mass date find out mass flow rate(mdt1) and pressure(pr1)
%Give final mass(mif)
mif=-------;
pr1=(4*9.81/(3.1416*df^2))*(mif-m);
sr=(32*mdt1/(dn*3.1415*dc^3));
st=((pr1-(1.5*dn*(sr*dc/8).^2/2))*dc/(4*Lc));
57
For MPDCV Viscometer
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% For MR fluid
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
clear all;
clc;
Sheet1=1;
m=1;
mdt1=1;
pr1=1;
srsst=1;
dsrsst=1;
load Sheet1.txt;
t=Sheet1(:,1);
x=Sheet1(:,2)/1000;
y=Sheet1(:,3)*1000;
cftool;
%Using cftool find out best fit for mass vs. time and pressure vs. time plot
%Using fitted mass and pressure(pr1)date find out mass flow rate(mdt1)
%Give final mass(mif)
dn=1400;
dc=0.0018;
Lc=0.1322;
sr=(32*mdt1/(dn*3.1415*dc^3));
st=((pr1-(1.5*dn*(sr*dc/8).^2/2))*dc/(4*Lc));
plot (sr,st);
srn=(0.75+0.25*(dsrsst(:,1)./dsrsst(:,2))).*sr;
58
2 CURVE FITTING RESULTS
MDCV
MO 09-17-2008 test 03
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.01362 (0.01361, 0.01363)
p2 = -0.197 (-0.1994, -0.1946)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 1.59
R-square: 0.9999
Adjusted R-square: 0.9999
RMSE: 0.03333
MO 09-17-2008 test 06
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.01362 (0.0136, 0.01364)
p2 = -0.3106 (-0.3164, -0.3048)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 8.134
R-square: 0.9993
Adjusted R-square: 0.9993
RMSE: 0.07722
59
wat 09-10-08 test 01
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.001283 (0.001267, 0.001299)
p2 = -0.2267 (-0.2704, -0.1829)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 4.457
R-square: 0.9941
Adjusted R-square: 0.9941
RMSE: 0.173
wat unknown test 03wf
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.001162 (0.001142, 0.001183)
p2 = -0.1026 (-0.158, -0.04726)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 7.526
R-square: 0.9883
Adjusted R-square: 0.9882
RMSE: 0.2247
60
MPDCV
water 01 03-13-09 tr 4
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.001041 (0.001039, 0.001043)
p2 = 0.08132 (0.07845, 0.08419)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 0.1864
R-square: 0.9993
Adjusted R-square: 0.9993
RMSE: 0.01585
MO 03-09-09 tr 03
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.01724 (0.01715, 0.01733)
p2 = -0.4407 (-0.579, -0.3025)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 1716
R-square: 0.9952
Adjusted R-square: 0.9952
RMSE: 1.623
61
MO 04-30-09 tr 04
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.01672 (0.01668, 0.01677)
p2 = -0.1066 (-0.2073, -0.005891)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 1249
R-square: 0.9987
Adjusted R-square: 0.9987
RMSE: 1.287
cowt 05-22-09 tr 02
General model Power2:
f(x) = a*x^b+c
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
a = 0.001565 (0.001531, 0.001599)
b = 1.343 (1.34, 1.345)
c = 0.9119 (0.89, 0.9337)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 58.83
R-square: 0.9998
Adjusted R-square: 0.9998
RMSE: 0.2458
62
MRF 05-03-09 tr 09
Linear model Poly1:
f(x) = p1*x + p2
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p1 = 0.03973 (0.03963, 0.03983)
p2 = 8.824 (8.723, 8.925)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 6378
R-square: 0.9972
Adjusted R-square: 0.9972
RMSE: 1.944
3 VISCOSITY TABLE:
Fluid Trail
Viscosity in Ns/m2
MDCV MPDCV
Water
1 0.001283 0.001041
2 0.001162 ----------
Mineral oil
1 0.01362 0.01724
2 0.01362 0.01672
MR Fluide 1 ----------- 0.03973