characterization of lignoboost lignin to predict possible ...biorefinery.utk.edu/ciber/kosa...
TRANSCRIPT
Characterization of LignoBoost lignin to predict possible
utilizationMatyas Kosa07-17-2009
Georgia Institute of TechnologySchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry
2
OUTLINE
• The need for biofuels• Lignin as a potential source,
biosynthesis• Kraft-cycle, LignoBoost, 2nd gen.
bioethanol pretreatm.• Results (so far): Purification, GPC,
NMR
3
WHY BIOFUELS?• Unpredictable nature of fossil fuel prices?
• Global warming, CO2 emissions…
M. Meinshausen et al, Nature, 2009, 458: 1158-1163
• Energy Independence!
4
PHENYLPROPANOID PATHWAY
Wout Boerjan et al, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2003, 54: 519-46Laurence B. Davin et al, Natural Product Reports, 2008, 25: 1015-1090
5
LIGNIN POLYMERIZATION
Wout Boerjan et al, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2003, 54: 519-46Laurence B. Davin et al, Natural Product Reports, 2008, 25: 1015-1090
6
KRAFT CYCLE-LIGNOBOOST
Johan Gullichsen and Carl-Johan Fogelholm: CHEMICAL PULPING,Papermaking Science and Technology series, Book 6A, 1999, TAPPI
7
PULPING CHEMISTRY
Johan Gullichsen and Carl-Johan Fogelholm: CHEMICAL PULPING,Papermaking Science and Technology series, Book 6A, 1999, TAPPI
8
ORGANOSOLV PROCESST. J. McDonoughTAPPISolvent Pulping Seminar1992
9
SAMPLE PURIFICATION PreliminaryResearchResults
10
GPC
Henrik Wallmo, PhD Thesis, Chalmers Univesity of Technology, 1999Ali Moosavifar et al, Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J, 2006, 21: 180-87
11
13C-NMR
12
1H-NMR
F samples contain significantly higher amounts of –OH groups of all examined types causing possibly their better solubility.
17.441.27.919.86.21.61.7F 9.5
16.752.45.918.74.20.91.1P 9.5
16.944.66.819.65.71.71.2F 10.5
16.049.28.219.73.71.00.8P 10.5
14.445.88.420.26.71.51.3BL
C-CH3C-CH2-OCH2=CH
C-CH2-C
-OCH3
CH-OCH=CHHC-OH-C(O)H-C(O)OH
2.25-0.00 ppm4.05-3.45 ppm6.00-4.05 ppm8.00-6.00 ppm9.35-8.00 ppm10.10-9.35 ppm
13.50-10.50 ppm
AliphaticMethoxylAliphaticAromatic, VinylPhenolicFormylCarboxylic acid
Hydrogen content of selected groups (in mol/mol% relative to all H contraining funct groups)
Sample name
13
31P-NMR
Derivatization of phenolic structures with 2–chloro–4,4,5,5–tetramethyl–1,3,2–dioxaphospholane (TMDP).
1.112.551.81.276.74F 9.5
0.591.471.141.114.3P 9.5
0.782.21.571.225.76F 10.5
0.391.030.850.913.18P 10.5
0.692.461.731.496.37BL
136.0-133.8 ppm
140.4-137.6 ppm
144.4-140.4 ppm
149.0-145.6 ppm
149.0-133.8ppm
Carboxylic hydroxylPhenolic @ G position
Phenolic in GAliphatic hydroxyl(mmol g-1)
Hydroxyl content of selected groups (mmol g-1)Total –OH content
Samplename
14
PYROLYSIS
14.7842.2542.98P 9.5 purified
0.9267.5531.53P 9.5 crude
1.34 1.121-2H/C molar ratio2.7164.1433.16BL crude
0.260.340O/C molar ratiogascharoilsample
P 9.5 (pur) pyrolysis oil
P 9.5 (pur) ligninGasolinePyrolysis [wt%]
• O/C and H/C molar ratios of purified LignoBoost precipitate lignin and of its pyrolysis oil show promising results
15
FURTHER ANALYSIS
• Repeating GPC measurements with smaller Mw standards
EXPERIMENTAL
• Analysis of sugars and possibly short chain fatty acids still present
• Analysis of LignoBoost final products when the process is in equilibrium with Kraft cycle
EDTA
ethers,alcohols
conjugated and non conjugated acids and esters
alkane
Raimo Alen et al, Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 1985, 19: 537-541Fredrik Ohman et al, Nordic Pulp Paper Res J, 2007, 22:188-193
Silverstein et al, Spectr. Ident. Org. Comp.,7th ed.,Wiley & Sons
16
POSSIBLE UTILIZATION
• Pyrolysis showed promising results meaning that further analysis can be fruitful
• Complete analysis and comparison of the outcome of different lignin degrading enzymes and converting microorganisms are ongoing
Thanks for listening!
Questions?