characteri s ing the fy-3a microwave temperature sounder using the ecmwf model
DESCRIPTION
Characteri s ing the FY-3A Microwave Temperature Sounder Using the ECMWF Model Qifeng Lu, William Bell, Peter Bauer, Niels Bormann and Carole Peubey National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA, Beijing Email: [email protected] ECMWF. Thanks to all who contributed to this work. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Slide 1
VAISALA Award Lecture
Characterising the FY-3A Microwave Temperature Sounder Using the ECMWF Model
Qifeng Lu, William Bell, Peter Bauer, Niels Bormann and Carole Peubey
National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA, BeijingEmail: [email protected]
ECMWF
Thanks to all who contributed to this work
Slide 2
VAISALA Award Lecture
Outline
Microwave sounding data in NWP and climate research: operational satellites from the US, Europe & China : 1978-2020
China’s FY-3A satellite: The Microwave Temperature Sounder (MWTS)
Identifying and characterising MWTS biases using NWP fields:
Passband shifts
Radiometer non-linearities
Improved Assimilation of MWTS
Summary and conclusion
Next Steps: Early results from the evaluation of MSU and AMSUA from 1978-2011
Slide 3
VAISALA Award Lecture
US
Europe
China
• Microwave sounding data provides information on temperature and humiditywhich has been widely used in :
• Operational NWP data assimilation systems and;• Climate research – to determine long term trends in atmospheric state
• The US has launched a series of polar satellites, dating back to 1978;• Europe began to contribute in 2006 (MetOp-A)• China began to contribute in 2008 (FY-3A)
Operational Sounding Satellites
Slide 4
VAISALA Award Lecture
The importance of MW sounding data in NWP
Largest positive impact (per system)is obtained from microwavetemperature sounding data
Forecast sensitivity toobservations (FSO)Is an adjoint based technique for assessing the influence of observing systems on forecast accuracy
(from C. Cardinali, ECMWF)
Slide 5
VAISALA Award Lecture 5
ok
Microwave TemperatureSounder (MWTS)4 channel (~MSU)
Microwave HumiditySounder (MWHS)5 channel (~MHS)
InfraredAtmospheric Sounder(IRAS) 20 channels (~HIRS/3)
Microwave Radiation Imager10 channels (~AMSR-E)
The FY-3A/B Instrument Suite
Slide 6
VAISALA Award Lecture
Comparison of MWTS and AMSU-A Brightness Temperatures
State dependent inter-satellite (MWTS vs AMSU-A) biases:
Region 1 (tropics): MWTS TBs warm relative to AMSU-ARegion 2 (high northern latitudes) : No significant bias
Brightness temperature map from cycle 2008091700
Characterize the MWTS
1
2
Slide 7
VAISALA Award Lecture
MWTS & AMSU-A Channel Specifications
• Microwave temperature sounders operate at 50-60 GHz in the O2 absorption band• The frequency of the channel pass band centre determines the layer sounded• MWTS is a 4 channel instrument, similar to earlier US MSU instruments• AMSU-A is a 14 channel radiometer.
Slide 8
VAISALA Award Lecture
4
3
2
State dependence of frequency drifterrors : lapse rate dependence
• Passband shifts raise / lower the weighting function peak• The resulting TB bias depends on the local temperature lapse rate
Slide 9
VAISALA Award Lecture
Schematic of error terms
Slide 10
VAISALA Award Lecture
Optimisation of pass band centre frequency estimates
Pass band centres:
design spec.measuredoptimised
• Shifts exist relative topre-launch measurements
Slide 11
VAISALA Award Lecture
MWTS Radiometer Non-linearity
ΔTMAX
FIRST GUESS DEPARTURES • design specified pass band• pre-launch measured• optimised• non-linearity corrected
Slide 12
VAISALA Award Lecture
MWTS-2 MWTS-3 MWTS-4
First Guess Departures (K) ,i.e.,Observation minus Simulation
Pre-launch measured passband
Optimised passband
• from line-by-line modelling• uncertainties of ~32-55 MHz detected and corrected
Non-linearity corrected
AMSU-A equivalent
Characterising the FY-3A MWTS:Detecting and Correcting passband errors and Non-linearities
Slide 13
VAISALA Award Lecture
MWTS OSEs Forecast Verification: Z at 200, 500 and 700 hPa
Improvementdue to MWTS data
Normalised differences in RMSErrors in Z, verified against own analysis90% confidence intervals shown
Small improvementsin SH in going from:
original data
→ recalibrated (low weight)
→ recalibrated (high weight)
NH close to neutralwith some benefit in recalibrated data
PRELAUNCH_MWTS(full system + original MWTS data)
HIOBSERR_MWTS(Full system + optimised MWTSwith low weight)
LOWOBSERR_MWTS(Full system + optimised MWTSwith high weight)
Slide 14
VAISALA Award Lecture
Summary FY-3A data has been evaluated at ECMWF through a comparison with simulated
radiances & full assimilation experiments in which FY-3A data is introduced in the
ECMWF system.
The study revealed, and corrected, biases in FY-3A MWTS related to :
Uncertainties in the passband centre frequencies
Radiometer non-linearities
These corrections bring the MWTS data close to the quality of equivalent AMSU-A
data & in assimilation experiments this MWTS data delivers improvements in forecast
accuracy.
The high value of NWP in Cal/Val of new satellite sensors has been clearly
demonstrated – further improvements in FY-3A and FY-3B data are expected, and it is
hoped NWP will again play a crucial role for FY-3C, …. FY-3G !
A powerful new general approach to diagnosing an important group of biases
affecting microwave sounders has been developed.
This work demonstrates the significant benefits of close collaboration between
satellite agencies and NWP centres.
Slide 15
VAISALA Award Lecture
Next Steps: Initial results from an evaluation of MSU and AMSUA from
1978
Slide 16
VAISALA Award Lecture
MSU CH3 (54.96 GHz): NOAA-6 to NOAA-14Fr
eque
ncy
Shift
/ M
Hz
STD
(FG
_DEP
)Im
prov
emen
t in
STD
(FG
_DEP
)
• LbL modelling based on ERA-Interim fields• 1 cycle per month: 1979 -2011
•Blue dots represent FG_DEP after shift correction•Colour dots before
Slide 17
VAISALA Award Lecture
Finally … Thanks !
The authors are honored to receive the Second Vaisala Award for 2012 and are very grateful to the Award Committee for recognising our work.
We would also like to acknowledge the contribution of colleagues from across the world (from CMA, ECMWF, UK Met Office and others besides) who made this work possible
And finally - thanks to the local CIMO-TECO-METREOREX organising committee for their hospitality here in the wonderful city of Brussels !