chapter 9 risk and rates of return

54
1 CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return Stand-alone risk (statistics review) Portfolio risk (investor view) -- diversification important Risk & return: CAPM/SML (market equilibrium)

Upload: bern

Post on 08-Feb-2016

71 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return. Stand-alone risk (statistics review) Portfolio risk (investor view) -- diversification important Risk & return: CAPM/SML (market equilibrium). Risk is viewed primarily from the stockholder perspective. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

1

CHAPTER 9Risk and Rates of Return

Stand-alone risk (statistics review)

Portfolio risk (investor view) --

diversification important

Risk & return: CAPM/SML (market

equilibrium)

Page 2: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

2Risk is viewed primarily from the stockholder perspective

Management cares about risk because stockholders care about risk.

If stockholders like or dislike something about a company (like risk) it affects the stock price.

Risk affects the discount rate for future returns -- directly affecting the multiple (P/E ratio)

Thus, the concern is still about the stock price. Stockholders have portfolios of investments –

they have stock in more than just one company and a great deal of flexibility in which stocks they buy.

Page 3: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

3

What is investment risk?

Investment risk pertains to the uncertainty regarding the rate of return.

Especially when it is less than the expected (mean) return.

The greater the chance of low or negative returns, the riskier the investment.

Page 4: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

4

Return = dividend + capital gain or loss

Dividends are relatively stable Stock price changes (capital gains/losses)

are the major uncertain component There is a range of possible outcomes and

a likelihood of each -- a probability distribution.

Page 5: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

5

Expected Rate of Return

The mean value of the probability distribution of possible returns

It is a weighted average of the outcomes, where the weights are the probabilities

Page 6: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

6Expected Rate of Return

(k hat)

n

1iii

nn2211

k

k...kkk̂

p

ppp

Page 7: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

7

Investment Alternatives

Economy Prob. T-bill HT Coll USR MP

Recession 0.1 8.0% -22.0% 28.0% 10.0% -13.0%

Below avg 0.2 8.0 -2.0 14.7 -10.0 1.0

Average 0.4 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 15.0

Above avg 0.2 8.0 35.0 -10.0 45.0 29.0

Boom 0.1 8.0 50.0 -20.0 30.0 43.0

1.0

Page 8: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

8Why is the T-bill

return independent of the economy?

Will return be 8%regardless of the economy?

Page 9: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

9

Do T-bills really promise acompletely risk-free return?

No, T-bills are still exposed tothe risk of inflation.However, not much unexpectedinflation is likely to occur over a relatively short period.

Page 10: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

10

Do the returns of HT and Coll.move with or counter to the

economy?

High Tech: With. Positive correlation.

Typical.

Collections: Countercyclical.

Negative correlation. Unusual.

Page 11: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

11

i

n

1=iipk = k

Calculate the expected rate ofreturn for each alternative:

k = expected rate of return

kHT = (-22%)0.1 + (-2%)0.20+ (20%)0.40 + (35%)0.20+ (50%)0.1 = 17.4%

^

^

^

Page 12: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

12

k

HT 17.4%

Market 15.0

USR 13.8

T-bill 8.0

Coll. 1.7

HT appears to be the best, but is it really?

^

Calculate others on your own

Page 13: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

13

What’s the standard deviationof returns for each alternative?

= Variance = 2

n

1=ii

2i p)k̂(k =

= standard deviation

Page 14: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

14

Normal Distribution

Page 15: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

15

One often assumes that data are from an approximately normally distributed population. then

about 68.26% of the values are at within 1 standard deviation away from the mean,

95.46% of the values are within two standard deviations and

99.73% lie within 3 standard deviations.

In a sample of observations

Page 16: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

16

= (k k) Pi2

ii=1

n

T-bills = 0.0%.HT = 20.0%. Coll = 13.4%.

USR = 18.8%. M = 15.3%.

^

0748599.20]403[]1.017.450

20.017.4-35 + 4.017.4-20 2.017.4-2- + 1.017.4-22-[ = 5.05.02

2222HT

Page 17: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

17

Standard deviation (i) measures total, or stand-alone, risk.

The larger the i , the lower the probability that actual returns will be close to the expected return.

Page 18: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

18

Security Expectedreturn

Risk,

High Tech 17.4% 20.0Market 15.0 15.3US Rubber 13.8* 18.8*T-bills 8.0 0.0Collections 1.7* 13.4*

Expected Returns vs. Risk:

*Return looks low relative to

Page 19: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

19

Coefficient of variation (CV):

Standardized measure of dispersionabout the expected value:

CV = Std devMean

=

k

Shows risk per unit of return.

Page 20: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

20

Portfolio Risk & Return

Assume a two-stock portfoliowith $50,000 in HighTech and $50,000 in Collections.

Calculate kp and p.

Page 21: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

21

Portfolio Expected Return, kp

n

1 = i.iip k̂w = k̂

kp is a weighted average:

kp = 0.5(17.4%) + 0.5(1.7%) = 9.6%

kp is between kHT and kCOLL.

^

^

^

^

^ ^

Page 22: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

22

Alternative Method:

Estimated ReturnEconomy Prob. HT Coll. Port.Recession 0.10 -22.0% 28.0% 3.0%Below avg. 0.20 -2.0 14.7 6.4Average 0.40 20.0 0.0 10.0Above avg. 0.20 35.0 -10.0 12.5Boom 0.10 50.0 -20.0 15.0

kp = (3.0%)0.1 + (6.4%)0.20 + (10.0%)0.4 + (12.5%)0.20 + (15.0%)0.1 = 9.6%

^

Page 23: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

23

2/1

2

22

22

1.06.90.15

20.06.95.124.06.90.10

20.06.94.61.09.6-3.0

=

P

= 3.3%

CV = 3.3%9.6%

= 0.34.P

Note: you can work the variance calculation in either decimal or percentage

Page 24: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

24

p = 3.3% is much lower than that of either stock (20% and 13.4%).

p = 3.3% is also lower than avg. of HT and Coll, which is 16.7%.

Portfolio provides avg. return but lower risk.

Reason: diversification. Negative correlation is present

between HT and Coll but is not required to have a diversification effect

Page 25: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

25

General Statements about risk:

Most stocks are positively correlated. rk,m 0.65.

You still get a lot of diversification effect at .65 correlation

35% for an average stock. Combining stocks generally

lowers risk.

Page 26: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

26What would happen to theriskiness of a 1-stock

portfolio as more randomlyselected stocks were added?

p would decrease because the added stocks would not be perfectly correlated

Page 27: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

27

# stocks in portfolio10 20 30 40 ...... 1500+

Company Specific risk

Market Risk

p %

35

20

0

Total Risk, P

Page 28: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

28

As more stocks are added, each new stock has a smaller risk-reducing impact.

p falls very slowly after about 40 stocks are included. The lower limit for p is about 20% = M .

Page 29: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

29Decomposing Risk—Systematic (Market) and

Unsystematic (Business-Specific) Risk

Fundamental truth of the investment world– The returns on securities tend to move up and

down together• Not exactly together or proportionately

Events and Conditions Causing Movement in Returns– Some things influence all stocks (market risk)

• Political news, inflation, interest rates, war, etc.– Some things influence only particular firms

(business-specific risk)• Earnings reports, unexpected death of key

executive, etc.– Some things affect all companies within an

industry• A labor dispute, shortage of a raw material

Page 30: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

30

Total = Market + Firm specificrisk risk risk

Market risk is that part of a security’s risk that cannot beeliminated by diversification.Firm-specific risk is that partof a security’s risk which canbe eliminated withdiversification.

Page 31: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

31

By forming portfolios, we can eliminate nearly half the riskiness of individual stocks (35% vs. 20%).

(actually35% vs. 20% is a 43%reduction)

Page 32: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

32

If you chose to hold a one-stock portfolio and thus areexposed to more risk than diversified investors, wouldyou be compensated for all the risk you bear?

CAPM -- Capital Asset Pricing Model

Page 33: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

33

NO! Stand-alone risk as

measured by a stock’s

or CV is not important to well-diversified investors.

Rational, risk averse investors are concerned with p , which is based on market risk.

Page 34: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

34 Beta measures a stock’s market risk. It shows a stock’s volatility relative to the market.

Beta shows how risky a stock is when the stock is held in a well-diversified portfolio.

The higher beta, the higher the expected rate of return.

Page 35: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

35

How are betas calculated? Run a regression of past

returns on Stock i versus returns on the market.

The slope coefficient is the beta coefficient.

Page 36: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

36

-5 0 5 10 15 20

20

15

10

5

-5

-10

Year kM ki 1 15% 18% 2 -5 -10 3 12 16

.

.

.

ki = -2.59 + 1.44 kM

Illustration of beta = slope:

Regression line

ik

Mk

Page 37: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

37Find beta:

Statistics program or spreadsheet regression

Find someone’s estimate of beta for a given stock on the web

Generally use weekly or monthly returns, with at least a year of data

Page 38: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

38

If beta = 1.0, average risk stock. (The ‘market’ portfolio has a beta of 1.0.)

If beta > 1.0, stock riskier than average.

If beta < 1.0, stock less risky than average.

Most stocks have betas in the range of 0.5 to 1.5.

Some ag. related companies have betas less than 0.5

Page 39: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

39

=1, get the market expected return

<1, earn less than the market expected return

>1, get an expected return greater than the market

Page 40: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

40

Answer: Yes, if the correlation between ki and kM is negative.

Then in a “beta graph” the regression line will slope downward. Negative beta -- rare

Can a beta be negative?

Page 41: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

41

HT

T-bills

b=0

ki

kM

-20 0 20 40

40

20

-20

b = 1.29

Collb = -0.86

Page 42: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

42

SecurityExpected

ReturnRisk

(Beta)HighTech 17.4% 1.29“Market” 15.0 1.00US Rubber 13.8 0.68T-bills 8.0 0.00Collections 1.7 -0.86

Riskier securities have higherreturns, so the rank order is O.K.

Page 43: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

43

Given the beta of a stock, a theoretical required rate of return can be

calculated. The Security Market Line (SML) is used. SML: ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)bi

MRP

MRP= market risk premium

Page 44: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

44

ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)bi

Page 45: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

45For Term Projects (2013)

Use KRF = 3.0%; this is a bit more than the current 10 year treasury rate of 2.75%. Sometimes analysts use a shorter term rate and short term treasuries are still extremely low, but we are going to use 3.0%.

Use MRP = 5%. This is MRP, not KM. The historical average MRP is about 5%. Find your own beta from the web On Yahoo Finance look up your company and

then the “key statistics” tab on the left will give you their beta

Page 46: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

46

The Bottom Line on Riskfree Rates  Using a long term government rate (even on a coupon bond) as the riskfree rate on all of the cash flows in a long term analysis will yield a close approximation of the true value. For short term analysis, it is entirely appropriate to use a short term government security rate as the riskfree rate.

  The riskfree rate that you use in an analysis should be in the same currency that your cashflows are estimated in. •  In other words, if your cashflows are in U.S. dollars, your riskfree rate has to be in U.S. dollars as well.•  If your cash flows are in Euros, your riskfree rate should be a Euro riskfree rate.  The conventional practice of estimating riskfree rates is to use the government bond rate, with the government being the one that is in control of issuing that currency. In US dollars, this has translated into using the US treasury rate as the riskfree rate. In May 2009, for instance, the ten-year US treasury bond rate was 3.5%.

Page 47: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

47

Use the SML to calculatethe required returns (for the example)

Assume kRF = 8%. Note that kM = kM is 15%. MRP = kM - kRF = 15% - 8% = 7%

SML: ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)bi .

^

Page 48: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

48

Required rates of return:

kHT = 8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%) 1.29= 8.0% + (7%)1.29= 8.0% + 9.0% = 17.0%

kM = 8.0% + (7%)1.00 = 15.0%kUSR = 8.0% + (7%)0.68 = 12.8%kTbill = 8.0% + (7%)0.00 = 8.0%kColl = 8.0% + (7%)(-0.86) = 2.0%

Page 49: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

49

Calculate beta for a portfolio with 50% HT and 50% Collections:

Portfolio Beta

bP = weighted average of the betas of the stocks in the portfolio

= 0.5(bHT) + 0.5(bColl)= 0.5(1.29) + 0.5(-0.86)= 0.22 .

Weights are the proportions invested in each stock.

Page 50: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

50

The required return on the HT/Coll. portfolio is:

kP = Weighted average k= 0.5(17%) + 0.5(2%) = 9.5% .

Or use SML for the portfolio:

kP = kRF + (kM - kRF) bP

= 8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%) (0.22)= 8.0% + 7%(0.22) = 9.5% .

Page 51: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

51

Using Beta—The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

The CAPM helps us determine how stock prices are set in the marketDeveloped in 1950s and 1960s by Harry

Markowitz and William Sharpe The CAPM's Approach

People won't invest unless a stock's expected return is at least equal to their required return

The CAPM attempts to explain how investors' required returns are determined

Page 52: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

52

Has the CAPM been verified through empirical tests?

Not completely. Because statistical tests have problems which make verification almost impossible.

Page 53: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

53

Investors seem to be concerned with both market risk and total risk. Therefore, the SML may not produce a correct estimate of ki:

ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)b + ?

Page 54: CHAPTER 9 Risk and Rates of Return

54

Also, CAPM/SML concepts are based on expectations, yet betas are calculated using historical data. A company’s historical data may not reflect investors’ expectations about future riskiness.