Chapter 9 -Density logs

Lecture notes for PET 370

Spring 2012

Prepared by: Thomas W. Engler, Ph.D., P.E.

Density Log

• Porosity/Lithology Determination

– Mineral identification in evaporates

– Gas detection (w/ other logs)

– Estimate mechanical properties (w/ sonic)

– Evaluation of shaly sands and complex lithologies

• other

– Determination of hydrocarbon density – Determination of oil shale yield – Identify overpressured zones

Uses

Density Log

Logging speed:

15 to 30 fpm

Depth of investigation: 3 to 6”

Tool Schematic

Vertical

Resolution ~ 1 ft

Density Log Principle of Operation

Bassiouni, 1994

Density Log

Density logging is based on measuring the attenuation of gamma rays caused by compton scattering, (CPS per energy)

Theory

Density Log

1. Compton scattering depends only on the electron density of the formation (# of electrons/cc)

2. The electron density is related to the bulk density by,

Where for common elements in sedimentary rocks,

But for H2 the ratio is double.

3. To account for variations in Z/A, the tool is calibrated in a freshwater filled limestone formation.

Where rba is the apparent bulk density.

1883.0e

0704.1ba

rr

Calibration

rr

A

Z2be

00.1A

Z2

Density Log

• rba rb for most common sedimentary rocks

• For other formations (salt, anhydrite, coal) corrections are necessary.

Calibration

Density Log FDC-Borehole Correction

Density Log Teague (Mckee) Field

La Munyon #76

Caliper

Incorrect

Density

Readings

Density Log

dolofor 2.86

lmsfor 2.71

ssfor 2.65

densitymatrixma

where

fma

bma

or

f

ma)1(

b

oncontributi

fluid pore

oncontributi

matrix

densitybulk

Measured

r

rr

rr

rrr

Porosity

Density Log

• Define rf as average density of fluid in pore space

• Depth of investigation of density tool is shallow (invaded zone), thus • In practice, Mud Type rmf (gm/cc) oil 0.9 Fresh water 1.0 Salt water 1.1 • In water-bearing zones, Sxo = 1 and rf = rmf • In oil-bearing zones, use same rf = rmf Assumes Sxo is large and rh rmf.

h)

xoS1(

mfxoS

frrr

Porosity

Density Log

The density porosity is usually calculated assuming rf = 1 gm/cc. Compare this apparent porosity, a, to the true porosity, t , that corresponds to a bulk density of 2.1 gm/cc in the following: (1). a water-bearing sandstone invaded by a mud filtrate of 1.05 gm/cc density

Porosity-Example

%3.330.165.2

1.265.2

fma

bmaa

rr

rr

%4.3405.165.2

1.265.2

fma

bmat

rr

rr

Density Log

The density porosity is usually calculated assuming rf = 1 gm/cc. Compare this apparent porosity, a, to the true porosity, t , that corresponds to a bulk density of 2.1 gm/cc in the following: (2). a 0.8 gm/cc oil-bearing sandstone characterized by Sor = 30%.

Porosity-Example

%3.330.165.2

1.265.2

fma

bmaa

rr

rr

975.0

8.0*3.005.1*7.0

h)

xoS1(

mfxoS

f

rrr

%8.32975.065.2

1.265.2

fma

bmat

rr

rr

Density Log

The density porosity is usually calculated assuming rf = 1 gm/cc. Compare this apparent porosity, a, to the true porosity, t , that corresponds to a bulk density of 2.1 gm/cc in the following: (3). a low pressure gas-bearing sandstone with 30% residual gas saturation.

Porosity-Example

%3.330.165.2

1.265.2

fma

bmaa

rr

rr

735.0

0*3.005.1*7.0

h)

xoS1(

mfxoS

f

rrr

%7.28735.065.2

1.265.2

fma

bmat

rr

rr

Density Log

The density porosity is usually calculated assuming rf = 1 gm/cc. Compare this apparent porosity, a, to the true porosity, t , that corresponds to a bulk density of 2.1 gm/cc in the following: (4). a change in matrix density to 2.68 gm/cc.

Porosity-Example

%3.330.165.2

1.265.2

fma

bmaa

rr

rr

%5.340.168.2

1.268.2

fma

bmat

rr

rr

Density Log

Example:

rmf = 1.1 gm/cc

rma = 2.71 gm/cc (reference)

A

B

C

Porosity?

rb = 2.81

rb = 2.68

rb = 2.40

Density Log

• Photoelectric absorption depends on both re and the average atomic number of the formation. •Two independent parameters, re and U, are measured in a low energy window

LDT - measurement

Density Log

The absorption rate depends on the absorption coefficient per electron (Pe) and re;

1883.0b

U0704.1eP

density,electron for Substitute

3cm

electronse*

electron

barnseP

3cm

barns U

r

r

LDT - measurement

Density Log

Advantage: The Pe curve distinguishes mineralogy regardless of porosity and fluid type in the pore space.

Common Pe values: quartz 1.81 calcite 5.08 dolomite 3.14 anhydrite 5.05

LDT - measurement

Density Log

LDT –Example

rmf = 1.0 gm/cc

Zone Y

Pe = ?

rb = ?

rma = ?

= ?

Zone X

Pe = ?

rb = ?

rma = ?

= ?

Density Log Dog Canyon (Wolfcamp) Field

Blackbird BKR St #2

Pe curve

Density Log

LDT • Detector counts high energy gamma rays (compton scattering) and low

energy region (photoelectric effect) • Measures both bulk density and Pe • Pe is strong function of matrix • Lower statistical variation • Better vertical resolution

FDC • Detects only high energy gamma rays • Measures only bulk density • Strong function of porosity, matrix, and fluids

LDT/FDC comparison

Density Log

Overpressured shale

Overpressured

Normal

Pressure

gradient

Bassiouni, Z: Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs, SPE Textbook Series, Vol. 4, (1994)

Chapter 2, Sec 6 – 8

Chapter 8

Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts, Houston, TX (1995)

Schlumberger, Log Interpretation and Principles, Houston, TX (1989)

Western Atlas, Log Interpretation Charts, Houston, TX (1992)

Western Atlas, Introduction to Wireline Log Analysis, Houston, TX (1995)

Halliburton, Openhole Log Analysis and Formation Evaluation, Houston, TX (1991)

Halliburton, Log Interpretation Charts, Houston, TX (1991)

Density Log References

Density Log Teague (Mckee) Field

La Munyon #76

Caliper

Pe curve

0 10