chapter 9 demand-side equilibrium: unemployment or inflation? a definite ratio, to be called the...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 9
Demand-Side Equilibrium:
Unemployment or Inflation?
A definite ratio, to be called the Multiplier, can be established
between income and investment.JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES
The Meaning Of Equilibrium GDP
• Assumptions – Constant
• Government expenditure G• Price level • Rate of interest → I constant• International value of the dollar → X-IM
constant
• Total production (Y) = Total income (NI)• Total expenditure (AD) = C + I + G + (X-
IM)3
The Meaning Of Equilibrium GDP
• Equilibrium– Consumers & firms
• No incentive to change behavior• Content - continue with things as they are
• If Total spending > Output– No equilibrium GDP
– Firms - Depleting inventory stocks• Increase production
– Meet higher demand
• Raise prices5
The Meaning Of Equilibrium GDP
• If Total spending < Output– No equilibrium GDP
– Firms• Inventory increase• Decrease production • Cut prices
– Stimulate demand
6
The Meaning Of Equilibrium GDP
• If Total Spending = Output– Equilibrium level of GDP - demand side
– Firms• Inventories - desired levels• No incentive to change
– Output– Prices
7
Mechanics of Income Determination
• Assumption– I, G, and X-IM are fixed
• Total expenditure = C + I + G +(X-IM)• Induced investment
– Part of investment spending• Rises - GDP rises• Falls - GDP falls
8
The total expenditure schedule
Table 1
9
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
GDP(Y)
Consumption(C)
Investment(I)
Government Purchases (G)
Net Exports(X-IM)
Total Expenditure
4,8005,2005,6006,0006,4006,8007,200
3,0003,3003,6003,9004,2004,5004,800
900900900900900900900
1,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,300
-100-100-100-100-100-100-100
5,1005,4005,7006,0006,3006,6006,900
Construction of the expenditure schedule
Figure 2
10
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
5,200 5,600 6,0000 6,400 6,800
Real GDP
7,200
3,900
4,800 C
6,0006,100
C+I
C+I+GC+I+G+(X-IM)
I=$900
G=$1,300
X-IM=-$100
Mechanics of Income Determination
• Expenditure schedule– Relationship
• National income (GDP)• Total spending
• Condition for equilibrium GDP (Y)
Y = C + I + G + (X-IM)
11
The determination of equilibrium output
Table 2
12
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Output (Y)
Total Spending[C+I+G+(X-IM)]
Balance ofSpending & Output
InventoryStatus
Producer Response
4,8005,2005,6006,0006,4006,8007,200
5,1005,4005,7006,0006,3006,6006,900
Spending exceeds outputSpending exceeds outputSpending exceeds output
Spending = outputOutput exceeds spendingOutput exceeds spendingOutput exceeds spending
FallingFallingFalling
ConstantRisingRisingRising
Produce moreProduce moreProduce more
No changeProduce lessProduce lessProduce less
Mechanics of Income Determination
• Income-expenditure diagram– 45° line diagram
– Plots• Total real expenditure - vertical axis• Real income - horizontal axis
– Specific price level
• 45° line– Marks off points:
• Income = expenditure
13
Income-expenditure diagram
Figure 3
14
4,800 5,200 5,6000 6,000 6,400
Real GDP
6,800 7,200
4,800
5,200
5,600
6,000
6,400
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
6,800
7,200
45°
C+I+G+(X-IM)
E
Equilibrium
Spending exceeds output
Output exceeds
spending
Mechanics of Income Determination
• If Expenditure line – above 45° line– Total spending > Total output
– Production – below equilibrium• Inventories – fall• Firms - increase production
• If Expenditure line- below 45° line– Total spending < Total output
– Production – above equilibrium• Inventories – rise• Firms - cut back production 15
Aggregate Demand Curve
• Higher prices– Decrease demand for goods & services
– Erode purchasing power• Of consumer wealth
– Lower real wealth
– Less spending• Any given level of real income
– Lower consumption function• Shift downward
16
Aggregate Demand Curve
• Lower prices– Increase demand for goods & services
– Enhance purchasing power• Of consumer wealth
– Higher real wealth
– More spending• Any given level of real income
– Higher consumption function• Shift upward
17
Shift of the consumption function
Figure 4
18
C0
Rea
l Con
sum
er S
pend
ing
Real Disposable Income
A
C2
C1Movements along
consumption function
Shifts of consumption
function
Aggregate Demand Curve
• Higher prices• Lower consumption function
– Total expenditure – shift downward
– Equilibrium quantity of real GDP demanded• Decreases
• Lower prices• Higher consumption function
– Total expenditure – shift upward
– Equilibrium quantity of real GDP demanded• Increases 19
Effect of the price level on equilibrium aggregate quantity demanded
Figure 5
20
Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45°
45°
Y0
C0+I+G+(X-IM)E0
C1+I+G+(X-IM)
Y1
E1
(a) Rise in price level
Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45°
45°
Y0
C0+I+G+(X-IM)E0
C2+I+G+(X-IM)
Y2
E2
(b) Fall in price level
Demand-Side Equilibrium&Full Employment
• Potential GDP– Full-employment level of output
• Equilibrium GDP < potential GDP – Occurs:
• Low spending (consumers C↓, investors I↓)• Low government spending (G↓)• Weak foreign demand (X↓)• Price level - too high (X↓, IM↑)
22
A recessionary gap
Figure 7
230
Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45°
C+I+G+(X-IM)
6,000 7,000
Potential
GDP
F
B
E
Recessionary gap
45°
Demand-Side Equilibrium&Full Employment
• Equilibrium GDP < potential GDP – Unemployment & Recession
– RecessionaryRecessionary gap - amount• Equilibrium level of real GDP• Falls short of potential GDP
– To reach full employment• IncreaseIncrease total expenditure line
24
Demand-Side Equilibrium&Full Employment
• Equilibrium GDP > potential GDP– Occurs because
• High spending (consumer C↑, investment I↑)• Strong foreign demand (X↑)• Government spends too much (G↑)• Low price level (X↑, IM↓)
25
An inflationary gap
Figure 8
260
Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45°
C+I+G+(X-IM)
8,0007,000
Potential
GDP
F
BE
Inflationary gap
45°
Demand-Side Equilibrium&Full Employment
• Equilibrium GDP > potential GDP– Inflation
– InflationaryInflationary gap• Equilibrium real GDP• Exceeds full-employment level of GDP
– To reach full employment• DecreaseDecrease total expenditure line
27
Demand-Side Equilibrium&Full Employment
• Full employment– Occurs:
• Spending plans – just right• Price level – just right
– No recessionary gap
– No inflationary gap
28
Coordination of Saving & Investment
• If S = I– Equilibrium at full employment
• On demand side• AD=C+I=GDP=NI=C+S → S=I
• If S ≠ I– Full employment is not an equilibrium
• S<I → inflationary gap• S>I → recessionary gap
29
Coordination of Saving & Investment
• Unemployment– Total spending - too low
– Stems from coordination failure• Savers are different from Investors
• Coordination failure– Party A – want to change behavior, if
• Party B – changes
– No changes – no coordination
31
Changes on Demand Side: Multiplier Analysis
• Question: What’s the effect of changes in C, I, G, (X-IM) on Y?
• Multiplier – Ratio of Change in equilibrium GDP (Y) by original change in spending
• Multiplier principle– GDP – rises by moremore than
• Change in spending
• Multiplier > 1
32
Total expenditure after a $200 billion increase in investment spending
• Multiplier = ∆Y/ ∆I = 800/200 = 4
Table 3
33
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
GDP(Y)
Consumption(C)
Investment(I)
Government Purchases (G)
Net Exports(X-IM)
Total Expenditure
4,8005,2005,6006,0006,4006,8007,200
3,0003,3003,6003,9004,2004,5004,800
1,1001,1001,1001,1001,1001,1001,100
1,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,300
-100-100-100-100-100-100-100
5,3005,6005,9006,2006,5006,8007,100
Illustration of the multiplier
Figure 10
340
Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45°
C+I1+G+(X-IM)
6,8006,000
C+I0+G+(X-IM)
E0
E1
$200 billion
Multiplier Analysis
• Multiplier =
= 1 + MPC + (MPC)^2 + (MPC)^3 +…• Oversimplified multiplier formula
• Actual multiplier– Much lower
35
MPC11
Multiplier
The multiplier spending chain
Table 4
36
(1) (2) (3)
RoundNumber
Spending inThis Round
CumulativeTotal
123456789
10...20...
“Infinity”
$1,000,000750,000562,500421,875316,406237,305177,979133,484100,11375,085
…4,228
…0
$1,000,0001,750,0002,312,5002,734,3753,050,7813,288,0863,466,0653,599,5493,600,6223,774,747
..3,987,317
…4,000,000
Multiplier is a General Concept
• InducedInduced increase in consumption spending– From: increase in consumer incomes– Movement alongalong consumption function
• AutonomousAutonomous increase in consumption– Independently of consumer incomes– ShiftShift of consumption function
• Only autonomous increase brings multiplier effect
• Change in C, I, G, or (X-IM)– SameSame multiplier effect 38
Total expenditure after consumers decide to spend $200 billion more (Autonomous increase)
Table 5
39
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
GDP(Y)
Consumption(C)
Investment(I)
Government Purchases (G)
Net Exports(X-IM)
Total Expenditure
4,8005,2005,6006,0006,4006,8007,200
3,2003,5003,8004,1004,4004,7005,000
900900900900900900900
1,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,300
-100-100-100-100-100-100-100
5,3005,6005,9006,2006,5006,8007,100
Multiplier is a General Concept
• GDPs of major economies– Linked by trade
• Boom in one country– Raise its imports
– Other countries• More exports• Increase GDP
• Recession in one country– Other countries
• Decrease GDP 40
Multiplier is a General Concept
• Booms and recessions tend to be transmittedtransmitted across national borders
Multiplier & Aggregate Demand Curve
• Income-expenditure diagrams– GivenGiven price level
• Different price levels– Different total expenditure curves
• Increase in spending– Given price level
– Multiplier effect
– Horizontal shift of aggregate demand
42
Multiplier & Aggregate Demand Curve
• An autonomous increase in spending leads to a horizontal shifthorizontal shift of the AD curve by an amount given by the oversimplified multiplier formula.
Two view of the multiplier
Figure 12
44
0 Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45° C+I1+G+(X-IM)
6,8006,000
C+I0+G+(X-IM)
E0
E1$200 billion
0 Real GDP
Pric
e Le
vel
6,8006,000
D0
D0 (I=$900)
D1
D1 (I=$1,100)
E1
100E0
Summary
• Demand side equilibrium
Y = AD = C + I +G +(X-IM)• Income-expenditure diagram• Derivation of AD curve• Inflationary gap vs. Recessionary gap• Multiplier is same for an autonomous
increase in C, I, G, and (X-IM)• Multiplier = 1/(1-MPC)
APPENDIX A
Algebra of income determination & multiplier
• b = MPC
46
bIM)(XGIbTa
Y
bDIaC
TYDI
IMXGICY
1
)(
b-11
Yin Change
APPENDIX B
Multiplier with variable imports• Our GDP – increase
– Our imports – increase
• Our exports– Relatively insensitive to own GDP
– Sensitive – other countries GDP
• International trade– Lowers – value of multiplier
47
Equilibrium income with variable imports
Table 6
48
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
GrossDomesticProduct
(Y)
ConsumerExpenditures
(C)Investment
(I)Government Purchases (G)
Exports(X)
Imports (IM)
NetExports(X-IM)
Total Expenditure
[C+I+G+(X-IM)]
4,8005,2005,6006,0006,4006,8007,200
3,0003,3003,6003,9004,2004,5004,800
900900900900900900900
1,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,300
650650650650650650650
570630690750810870930
+80+20-40
-100-160-220-280
5,2805,5205,7606,0006,2406,4806,720
The dependence of net exports on GDP
Figure 13
49
4,800 5,200 5,6000 6,000 6,400 Real GDP6,800 7,200
450550650750850
Rea
l Exp
orts
& I
mpo
rts
950IM
X
Negative net exportsPositive net exports
4,800 5,200 5,6006,000
6,400
Real GDP
6,800 7,200
-300-200-100
0100
Rea
l Net
Exp
orts 200
X-IM
Negative net exportsPositive net exports
APPENDIX B
Multiplier with variable imports• Our GDP – increase
– Net exports – decline
• International trade– Lowers – value of multiplier
• Any autonomous increase in spending– Partly dissipated
• Purchases of foreign goods
– Additional income – foreigners
50
Equilibrium GDP with variable imports
Figure 14
51
0 Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture
45°
C+I+G+(X-IM)
(variable imports)
6,000
C+I+G+(X-IM)
(fixed imports)
E
X-IMPositive net exports Negative net exports
Equilibrium income after a $160 billion increase in exports
Table 7
52
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Gross DomesticProduct
(Y)
ConsumerExpenditures
(C)Investment
(I)Government Purchases (G)
Exports(X)
Imports (IM)
NetExports(X-IM)
Total Expenditure
[C+I+G+(X-IM)]
4,8005,2005,6006,0006,4006,8007,200
3,0003,3003,6003,9004,2004,5004,800
900900900900900900900
1,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,3001,300
810810810810810810810
570630690750810870930
+240+180+120+60
0-60
-120
5,4405,6805,9206,1606,4006,6406,800