chapter 6
DESCRIPTION
strategic management 3rd edition cases and concepts full slides of each chapter!TRANSCRIPT
6-1 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitive Rivalry and Competitive Dynamics
Chapter 6
6-2 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitive Rivalry & Competitive Dynamics
Knowledge objectives:1.1. Define competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive Define competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive
behaviour, and competitive dynamics.behaviour, and competitive dynamics.
2. Describe market community and resource similarity as the building blocks of a competitor analysis.
3.3. Explain awareness, motivation, and ability as drivers Explain awareness, motivation, and ability as drivers of competitive behaviour.of competitive behaviour.
4. Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will take competitive actions.
5.5. Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will respond to actions taken against it.will respond to actions taken against it.
6. Explain competitive dynamics in slow-cycle, fast-cycle, and standard-cycle markets.
6-3 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitive DynamicsResults from a series of competitive actions and competitive responses among firms competing within a particular industry.
Competitive RivalryExists when two or more firms jockey with one another in the pursuit of better market position.
6-4 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
From Competitors to Competitive Dynamics
CompetitorsCompetitors
• Through competitiveThrough competitivebehavior -behavior -• Competitive actionsCompetitive actions• Competitive responsesCompetitive responses
• To gain an advantageousTo gain an advantageousmarket positionmarket position
Competitive DynamicsCompetitive Dynamics• Competitive actions and responses taken by allCompetitive actions and responses taken by all
firms competing in a marketfirms competing in a market
CompetitiveCompetitiverivalryrivalry
Engage Engage inin
Creates?Creates?
Creates?Creates?
Why?Why?
How?How?
6-5 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Ability for Action and Response
Outcomes
Interfirm Rivalry:Attack & Response
A Model of Competitive Rivalry
Competitor Analysis
Drivers of Competitive Behaviour
Feedback
6-6 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Ability for Action and Response
Outcomes
Awareness
Motivation
Interfirm Rivalry:Attack & Response
A Model of Competitive Rivalry (1)
Competitor Analysis
Drivers of Competitive Behaviour
Feedback
6-7 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Drivers of Competitive Behaviour
Drivers of Competitive Behaviour
Does the firm have appropriate incentives to attack or respond?
Do managers understand key characteristics of competitors?
Motivation
Awareness
*
6-8 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Ability for Action and Response
Outcomes
Awareness
Interfirm Rivalry:Attack & Response
A Model of Interfirm Rivalry (2)
Competitor Analysis
Drivers of Competitive Behaviour
Feedback
MarketCommonality
ResourceSimilarity
Motivation
6-9 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitor Analysis
The first step the firm takes to be able to predict the extent and nature of it’s rivalry
with each competitor.
6-10 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitor Analysis
• Market Commonality
The number of markets with which the firm and a competitor are jointly involved and the degree of importance of each market.
• Resource Similarity
The extent to which the firm’s tangible & intangible resources are comparable to a competitors in terms of both type & amount.
6-11 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitor Analysis
Market Commonality
Competitor Analysis
Do firms compete with each other in multiple markets?
Multipoint competition tends to reduce competitive interactions, but increases likelihood of response where interaction occurs.
For example, airlines price flights similarly, but respond quickly when competitors introduce promotional prices.
**
6-12 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitor Analysis
Resource Similarity
Market Commonality
Competitor Analysis
Do firms compete with each other in multiple markets?
Do competitors possess similar types or amounts of resources?
**
6-13 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Likelihood of Attack
First Mover Incentives
Likelihood of Response
Competitive Action Type
Dependence on Market
Resource Availability
Actor’s Reputation
Ability for Action and Response
Outcomes
Awareness
Interfirm Rivalry:Attack & Response
A Model of Interfirm Rivalry (3)
Competitor Analysis
Drivers of Competitive Behaviour
Feedback
MarketCommonality
ResourceSimilarity
Motivation
6-14 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Attack:
• First movers allocate funds forFirst movers allocate funds for– product innovation and developmentproduct innovation and development– aggressive advertisingaggressive advertising– advanced research and developmentadvanced research and development
• First movers can gain First movers can gain – the loyalty of customers who may the loyalty of customers who may
become committed to the firm’s become committed to the firm’s goods or servicesgoods or services
– market share that can be difficult for market share that can be difficult for competitors to take during future competitors to take during future competitive rivalrycompetitive rivalry
First moverFirst moverincentivesincentives
First Mover IncentivesFirst Mover Incentives
6-15 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
SizeSize
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Attack:
• Small firms are more likelySmall firms are more likely– to launch competitive actions to launch competitive actions – to be quicker in doing so.to be quicker in doing so.
• Small firms are perceived asSmall firms are perceived as– nimble and flexible competitors nimble and flexible competitors – relying on speed and surprise to relying on speed and surprise to
defend their competitive advantages defend their competitive advantages or develop new ones while engaged or develop new ones while engaged in competitive rivalry.in competitive rivalry.
• Small firms have the flexibility needed to Small firms have the flexibility needed to launch a greater variety of competitive launch a greater variety of competitive actions.actions.
First moverFirst moverincentivesincentives
SizeSize
6-16 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Attack:
• Large firms are likely to initiate more Large firms are likely to initiate more competitive actions as well as strategic competitive actions as well as strategic actions during a given time period.actions during a given time period.
• Large organizations commonly have the Large organizations commonly have the slack resources required to launch a larger slack resources required to launch a larger number of total competitive actions.number of total competitive actions.
First moverFirst moverincentivesincentives
SizeSize
SizeSize
““Think and act big and we’ll get smaller. Think and Think and act big and we’ll get smaller. Think and act small and we’ll get bigger.”act small and we’ll get bigger.”
- Herb Kelleher, Former CEO, Southwest Airlines- Herb Kelleher, Former CEO, Southwest Airlines
6-17 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
QualityQuality
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Attack:
• Quality exists when the firm’s goods or Quality exists when the firm’s goods or services meet or exceed customers’ services meet or exceed customers’ expectations.expectations.
First moverFirst moverincentivesincentives
SizeSize
QualityQuality
• Product quality dimensions include:Product quality dimensions include:– PerformancePerformance– FeaturesFeatures– FlexibilityFlexibility– DurabilityDurability– ConformanceConformance– ServiceabilityServiceability– AestheticsAesthetics– Perceived qualityPerceived quality
6-18 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
QualityQuality
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Attack:
• Quality exists when the firm’s goods or Quality exists when the firm’s goods or services meet or exceed customers’ services meet or exceed customers’ expectations.expectations.
First moverFirst moverincentivesincentives
SizeSize
QualityQuality
• Service quality dimensions include:Service quality dimensions include:– TimelinessTimeliness
– CourtesyCourtesy
– ConsistencyConsistency
– ConvenienceConvenience
– CompletenessCompleteness
– AccuracyAccuracy
6-19 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Quality Dimensions of Goods & Services
Product Quality Dimensions:
Performance Operating characteristics
Features Important special characteristics
Flexibility Meeting operating specifications over time
Durability Amount of use before performance declines
Conformance Match with pre-established standards
Serviceability Ease and speed of repair or normal service
Aesthetics How a product looks and feels
Perceived Subjective assessment of characteristics (product image)quality
6-20 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Quality Dimensions of Goods & Services
Service Quality Dimensions:
Timeliness Performed in promised period of time
Courtesy Performed cheerfully
Consistency Giving all customers similar experiences
Convenience Accessibility to customers
Completeness Fully serviced, as required
Accuracy Performed correctly each time
6-21 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Response
• Firms study three factors to predict how a Firms study three factors to predict how a competitor is likely to respond to competitive competitor is likely to respond to competitive actions:actions:
- type of competitive action- type of competitive action
- reputation- reputation
- market dependence- market dependence
6-22 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competition
• Competitive DynamicsCompetitive Dynamics– competitive dynamics concerns the ongoing actions competitive dynamics concerns the ongoing actions
and responses taking place among and responses taking place among allall firms firms competing within a market for advantageous positionscompeting within a market for advantageous positions
• Competitive RivalryCompetitive Rivalry– building and sustaining competitive advantages are at building and sustaining competitive advantages are at
the core of competitive rivalrythe core of competitive rivalry
– competitive advantages are the link to an competitive advantages are the link to an advantageous market positionadvantageous market position
6-23 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Response:
• Strategic actions receive strategic Strategic actions receive strategic responsesresponses
• Tactical responses are taken to counter Tactical responses are taken to counter the effects of tactical actionsthe effects of tactical actions
• Strategic actions elicit fewer total Strategic actions elicit fewer total competitive responsescompetitive responses
• A competitor likely will respond quickly to A competitor likely will respond quickly to a tactical actiona tactical action
• The time needed to implement and The time needed to implement and assess a strategic action delays assess a strategic action delays competitors’ responsescompetitors’ responses
Type ofType ofcompetitivecompetitive
actionaction
Type of Competitive ActionType of Competitive Action
6-24 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
ReputationReputation
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Response:
• An actor is the firm taking an action or An actor is the firm taking an action or responseresponse
• Reputation is the positive or negative Reputation is the positive or negative attribute ascribed by one rival to another attribute ascribed by one rival to another based on past competitive behaviorbased on past competitive behavior
• The firm studies responses that a The firm studies responses that a competitor has taken previously when competitor has taken previously when attacked to predict likely responsesattacked to predict likely responses
Type ofType ofcompetitivecompetitive
actionaction
ReputationReputation
6-25 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
MarketMarketdependencedependence
Factors Affecting Likelihood of Response:
• Market dependence is:Market dependence is:– the extent to which a firm’s revenues the extent to which a firm’s revenues
or profits are derived from a particular or profits are derived from a particular market.market.
• In general, firms can predict that In general, firms can predict that competitors with high market competitors with high market dependence are likely to respond dependence are likely to respond strongly to attacks threatening their strongly to attacks threatening their market position.market position.
Type ofType ofcompetitivecompetitive
actionaction
ReputationReputation
Market DependenceMarket Dependence
6-26 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitive Market Types
Slow, Standard, Fast Cycle
Outcomes
Slow cycle markets are frequently shielded by monopoly power or very strong brand loyalties.
This market outcome & lack of interfirm rivalry may lead to sustained competitive advantage.
Slow, Standard, Fast, Cycle
Model of Interfirm Rivalry: Outcomes
**
6-27 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitive Market Types
Slow, Standard, Fast Cycle
Outcomes
Slow, Standard, Fast Cycle
Model of Interfirm Rivalry: Outcomes
Firms with multi-market competition may dampen rivalry somewhat.
Sustained competitive advantage is a possible outcome in this instance.
Standard cycle markets often lead to highly competitive pressures despite world class products.
6-28 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Competitive Market Types
Slow, Standard, Fast Cycle
Outcomes
Slow, Standard, Fast Cycle
Model of Interfirm Rivalry: Outcomes
Fast cycle markets are intensely dynamic and a 1st mover advantage is often unsustainable.
Firms may cannibalize older generation product while introducing new innovative premium ones.
Sustainable competitive advantage is unlikely.
6-29 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Sustained Competitive
Competitive Market Types
Slow, Standard, Fast Cycle
Competitive Outcomes
AdvantageTemporary Advantage
Outcomes
Model of Interfirm Rivalry: Outcomes
**
6-30 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Time (years) 5
Launch
ExploitationCounterattack
Returns from a
Competitive Advantage
Competitive Advantage Which Eventually Erodes
6-31 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Time (years)10
Launch
Exploitation Counterattack
Returns from a
Competitive Advantage
5 15
Obtaining Temporary Advantages to Create Sustained Advantage
6-32 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Time (years)10
Launch
Exploitation Counterattack
Returns from a
Sustained Competitive Advantage
5 15
Firm has already moved on to Advantage No. 2
Obtaining Temporary Advantages to Create Sustained Advantage
6-33 © 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Time (years)10
Launch
Exploitation Counterattack
Returns from a
Sustained Competitive Advantage
5 15
Firm continues to move on to the next Advantage
Obtaining Temporary Advantages to Create Sustained Advantage