chapter 5 2014

24
CHAPTER 5 NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND THE ROLE OF PURCHASING

Upload: nurfitry-hareqh

Post on 09-Apr-2016

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

enjoy

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 5 2014

CHAPTER 5

NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND THE ROLE OF PURCHASING

Page 2: Chapter 5 2014

KEY CONCEPTS• The Design Process

– The Investigation or Concept Formation Phase – The Development Phase – The Production Phase– Value Engineering Vis-à-vis Value Analysis

• Engineering Change Management• How to Expand Supply Management's Contributions

– Design or Project Teams – Materials Engineers – Co‑location

• Buyers Supply Management Professionals Who Interface Successfully with Engineers

Page 3: Chapter 5 2014

Overview• Four Key Issues

– Early supply management and supplier involvement

– Design and development process of new products

– Approaches to increasing supply management’s role in the new product development process

– Description of supply management professionals who interface successfully with engineers

Page 4: Chapter 5 2014

The Design Process• The Investigation or Concept

Formation Phase • The Development Phase • The Production Phase• Value Engineering Vis-à-vis Value

Analysis

Page 5: Chapter 5 2014

Investigation Phase• Defining the New Product • Statement of Objectives • Key Technology • Development of Alternatives

– Suitability – Produceaibility – Component availability – Customer acceptability

Figure 10-1, Figure 10-1, Upper HalfUpper Half

Page 6: Chapter 5 2014

Investigation Phase Continued• Development of

Alternatives – Make‑or‑Buy and

Outsourcing Analysis

– Select Components, Technologies, and Supplies

– Stress Testing and Failure Analysis

Figure 10-1, Figure 10-1, Lower HalfLower Half

Page 7: Chapter 5 2014

Questions to Ask Prior to Inviting a Supplier into the Design Process

• Will the supplier be able to meet our cost, quality, and product performance requirements?

• Does the supplier possess the required engineering capability?

• Will the supplier be able to meet our development and production needs?

• Does it have the necessary physical process and quality capabilities required?

• Does the supplier have both the resources and the reputation of being able to overcome problems and obstacles as they arise?

Page 8: Chapter 5 2014

Questions to Ask Prior to Inviting a Supplier into the Design Process

• Is the supplier financially viable?• Are the supplier's short and long term

business objectives compatible with ours?• If a long term relationship appears

desirable, are the technology plans of the two firms compatible?

• If a long term relationship appears desirable, is it likely that we can build a trusting relationship?

Page 9: Chapter 5 2014

The Development Phase • Prototypes • Design Reviews • Qualification Testing

– margin tests – life tests

• Failure Analysis • Meet Objectives? • Value Engineering

Figure 10-2, Figure 10-2, Upper HalfUpper Half

Page 10: Chapter 5 2014

The Development Phase

• Design Analysis • The Value

Engineering Checklist

• Viability

Figure 10-2, Figure 10-2, Lower HalfLower Half

Page 11: Chapter 5 2014

Value Engineering• Value engineering is a systematic study

of every element of cost in a material, item of equipment, service or construction project to ensure that every element of cost fulfills a necessary function and at the lowest possible total cost

• Value engineering is focused on the design stage

Page 12: Chapter 5 2014

What is Value?• Value can be defined as the lowest end cost at which

the function can be accomplished at the time and place and with the quality required

• Some items/services/processes which cost less than a similar item/service/process may accomplish the function in a superior or equal manner

• Value cannot be determined exclusively by an examination of the item/service/process being evaluated

• The value of any service, material, or product is established by the minimum cost of the other alternatives that will perform the same function

Page 13: Chapter 5 2014

Generalized Procedure for VA/VE

Information Phase

Analysis Phase

Decision Phase

Speculation Phase

Evaluation Phase

What is it?What does it do?What does it cost?

How else can the job be done?At what cost?Is the change better?

How much better?Why?

Review with depts and suppliersSelect best alternativeGet approvalPrepare specificationsAudit effectiveness

Use experienceProvide feedback

Figure 10-3, AdaptedFigure 10-3, Adapted

Page 14: Chapter 5 2014

Analysis of Each Component• Can any part be eliminated without impairing the

operation of the complete unit?• Can the design of the part be simplified to reduce

its basic cost?• Can the design of the part be changed to permit the

use of simplified or less costly production methods?• Can less expensive but equally satisfactory

materials be used in the part?• Design simplifications frequently are more apparent

than is possible under the original design

Page 15: Chapter 5 2014

The Value Engineering Checklist1. Can the item be eliminated? 2. If the item is not standard, can a standard item be used? 3. If it is a standard item, does it completely fit the application, or is it a misfit? 4. Does the item have greater capacity than required? 5. Can the weight be reduced? 6. Is there a similar item in inventory that could be substituted? 7. Are closer tolerances specified than are necessary?

Page 16: Chapter 5 2014

The Value Engineering Checklist8. Is unnecessary machining performed on the item? 9. Are unnecessarily fine finishes specified?10. Is "commercial quality" specified?11. Can you make the item less expensively in your

plant? If you are making it now, can you buy it for less?

12. Is the item properly classified for shipping purposes to obtain lowest transportation rates?

13. Can cost of packaging be reduced?14. Are suppliers contributing suggestions to reduce

cost?

Page 17: Chapter 5 2014

The Production Phase• Manufacturing and

Production Plans • Knowledge Transfer • Process Control • In‑Process and Final

Testing – adjust or calibrate

the performance – eliminate defects

before much value is added to the product

Figure 10-4, Figure 10-4, Upper HalfUpper Half

Page 18: Chapter 5 2014

Production Phase ContinuedFigure 10-4, Figure 10-4, Lower HalfLower Half

Page 19: Chapter 5 2014

Engineering Change Management

• Material control involvement:– provide input on the purchased materials

implications of a proposed change, – discuss the timing of proposed changes

in order to minimize costs associated with unusable incoming materials,

– to be aware of forthcoming changes so that appropriate action can be taken with affected suppliers.

Page 20: Chapter 5 2014

How to Expand Supply Management’s Contributions

• Design or Project Teams• Materials Engineers

– materials engineering and – supply management activities of

sourcing, pricing, and negotiating • Co‑Location (Harley-Davidson)

– Faster to market, – reduced total cost, – improved quality

Page 21: Chapter 5 2014

Supply Management Professionals Who Interface Successfully with

Engineers• Early Supply Management Involvement is part of the

culture and policy of the firm– Formerly called Early Purchasing Involvement (EPI)– Often requires policy development from upper management to

ensure initial involvement• Engineers view Supply Management involvement as an

asset, not a nuisance– Supply Managers must acquire skills and knowledge– Learn how to read engineering drawings– Learn technical terms– Meet with supplier’s sales personnel to review technical

information about products– Visit suppliers

Page 22: Chapter 5 2014

CONCLUSION

• The design stage provides the greatest opportunity to reduce costs

• Supply management and the firm's suppliers have major contributions to make during this process

• Analysis of adding value is not limited to a firm’s services and products, supply managers themselves must add value to the design process in order to become a viable and lasting member of the design team

Page 23: Chapter 5 2014

QUESTION• WHEN SUPPLIERS ARE DEEPLY INVOLVED IN NPD , WHERE DO THE POWER IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN LAYS ?

Page 24: Chapter 5 2014

KESIMPULAN• kedua-dua pengadil akademik dan bukan akademik

diperlukan dalam menilai produk P&P IPT untuk saling lengkap melengkapi bagi membantu produk P&P IPT diberi penambahbaikan, diketengahkan dan seterusnya dipasarkan.

• Kajian lanjutan dengan menggunakan kaedah kualitatif terhadap penyelidik ataupun pengadil untuk mengetahui dengan lebih mendalam persepsi responden terhadap faktor-faktor, cabaran dan masalah dalam mengkomersialkan sesuatu produk