chapter 4 · with a 10 ml: 1 g solvent to dry weight ratio. ... µl sterile mueller hilton broth....
TRANSCRIPT
38
CHAPTER 4
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
4.1 PLANT MATERIAL
Fresh or dried plant material can be used as a source for secondary plant
components. Most scientists have opted to use dry material for several reasons: (i)
traditional healers frequently use dried plant material, (ii) the time delay between
collecting plant material and processing it makes it difficult to work with fresh
material and (iii) there are fewer problems associated with the large scale extraction
of dried plant material. Freshly harvested and dried materials are more commonly
used since old dried material may undergo some quantitative losses and qualitative
changes. In the present study dried material was used.
Combretum erythrophyllum [Burch] Sond. leaves were collected from a tree in
the Pretoria National Botanic Gardens. The tree was identified by the plant label and
the identity was confirmed by Mrs C.L. Bredenkamp, the curator of Combretaceae at
the National Botanical Institute. A voucher specimen was deposited in the National
Herbarium (C.L. Bredenkamp 1542 PRE). With later studies leaves were collected
from various sites around Pretoria and voucher specimens were deposited in the
National Herbarium.
University of Pretoria.etd
39
4.2 PREPARATION OF LEAF MATERIAL AND EXTRACTION
Farnsworth [1994] states that the biggest problem in drug development from
plants is choosing the appropriate extracting solvent.
Soxhlet extraction of dried plant material is widely used employing solvents of
increasing polarity, e.g. ether, petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate and ethanol.
This method only works for compounds that can withstand the high temperatures of
the boiling solvent but cannot be used for thermolabile compounds. This problem can
be overcome by boiling at reduced pressure but this can be difficult and was therefore
not used in this study.
The choice of solvent also depends on what is planned with the extract. If the
extract is to be used for antimicrobial screening, the effect of the solvent on
subsequent bioassay is important. From previously published papers where authors
screened plants for antimicrobial properties, it can be noted that the authors used a
variety of extractants. These have varied from 80% ethanol [Vlietinck, 1995],
methanol [Taylor, 1995], petroleum ether, chloroform, ethanol, methanol and water
[Salie, 1996]. In previous studies it was found, however, that acetone extracted a
greater number of inhibitors (14) than those extracted with methanol (9), methylene
dichloride (11), ethanol (8) and water (1), and was therefore used in this study to
extract the crude material [Eloff, 1998].
The leaves were carefully examined and old, insect-damaged; fungus-infected
leaves, twigs and flowers were removed. Healthy leaves were spread out and dried in
the laboratory at room temperature for 5-8 days or until they broke easily by hand.
Once completely dry, leaf material was ground to a fine powder using a Jankel and
Künkel Model A10 mill. Larger quantities were sent to Phytotron at the Department
of Plant Production and Soil Science, where a Wiley mill was used to grind material
to a fine powder of c. 1.0 mm diameter. Material was stored in a closed container at
room temperature until required.
University of Pretoria.etd
40
Extraction was initially performed on a Labotec Model 20.2 shaking apparatus
with a 10 ml: 1 g solvent to dry weight ratio. With larger quantities of material, a ratio
of 5 ml: 1 g was used and shaken continuously for an hour each time. This procedure
was repeated three times and all extracts were decanted and combined.
The extracts were filtered before drying using Whatman filter paper no. 2 on a
Büchner funnel and the solvent removed by vacuum distillation in a Büchi rotary
evaporator at 60ºC, care being taken to decrease the temperature to 40°C for the final
drying. For quantitative determination, the extracts were placed in pre-weighed flasks
before drying. Technical grade acetone [Merck] was used as solvent.
4.3 ANALYSIS BY TLC
Thin layer chromatography [usually 5 µl of a 100 mg extract/ml solution] was
on Merck TLC F254 or Macherey-Nagel Alugram Sil G 254 or Polygram Sil G UV254
plates using chloroform:ethyl acetate:formic acid [5:4:1], acetone:methylene
dichloride [2:3] and benzene:ethanol [9:1] as eluents. Streaking of polar components
was minimised by the addition of 1% ammonium chloride to the benzene:ethanol
solution. In some cases DC Alufolien RP18 F254 [Merck] plates were used, eluting
with varying ratios of water: methanol. Samples were applied quickly and run without
delay to minimise the possibility of oxidative or photo-oxidative change. Separated
components were visualised under visible and ultraviolet light [254 and 360 nm,
Camac Universal UV lamp TL-600]. Plates were also sprayed with 5% anisaldehyde
in 5% sulphuric acid in ethanol and 0.36% vanillin in 3.6% sulphuric acid in methanol
and heated for 2-5 minutes at 100°C to allow for development of colour changes [Carr
and Rogers, 1986].
University of Pretoria.etd
41
4.4 BIOASSAY AND TEST ORGANISMS
The biological assays employed were chosen because of their simplicity,
reproducibility, and sensitivity and relatively low cost while being rapid and simple at
the same time.
4.4.1 Antibacterial activity
Minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] was determined by serial dilution of
extracts beyond the level where no inhibition of growth of test organisms was
observed [Eloff, 1998]. This was performed in microplates by filling all wells, with 50
µl sterile Mueller Hilton broth. In row A, 50 µl [100%] of the extract was placed with
a micropipette. From row A, 50 µl was transferred to row B after taking up and
releasing three times to ensure adequate mixing. The process was repeated until all
the rows were completed and the additional 50 µl from row H was discarded. Two
wells were used as a sterility and growth control respectively with the sterility control
containing only Oxoid Mueller Hilton broth (MHB), whilst the growth control
containing both MHB as well as test organism.
After adding 50 µl of the bacterial suspension to each row (except for the sterility
control), the microplate was sealed and incubated at 37°C at 100% relative humidity
overnight. The following morning 50 µl of a 0.2 mg/ml solution of INT (p-iodo-
nitrotetrazolium violet) was added to each row and the plate was returned to the
incubator for at least half an hour to ensure adequate colour development. p-INT is a
dehydrogenase activity detecting reagent, which is converted into corresponding
intensely coloured formazan by metabolically active micro-organisms [Navarro,
1998].
University of Pretoria.etd
42
Inhibition of growth was indicated by a clear solution or a definite decrease in colour
reaction. This value was taken as the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] of the
extract. Extracts used for MIC determination were either dissolved in acetone or
solubilized in DMSO (100 to 200 µl/mg) and made up as a stock solution (200 µg/ml)
with distilled water. Well A had typically a final concentration of 100 µg/ml. Positive
controls for test organisms were usually made up to a concentration of 1000 µg/ml
and are listed in section 4.4.3.
4.4.2 Bioautography
Chromatograms were dried overnight to remove solvents from the plate. In the
case of TLC plates run in CEF, plates were dried for at least 40 hours to ensure
adequate removal of formic acid. The plates were then sprayed with a suspension of
actively growing Staphylococcus aureus bacterial cells and incubated overnight at
37°C in a chamber at 100% relative humidity. The following morning, the plates were
sprayed with a 2 mg/ml solution of p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet [Sigma]. Inhibition
of growth was indicated by clear zones on the chromatogram [Begue and Kline,
1972]. This method was chosen for its simplicity, low cost, accuracy and fast results.
4.4.3 Test organisms used
The following test organisms were commonly used to test minimum inhibitory
concentration of the extracts: Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) [American Type
Culture Collection number 29213] Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gram-negative) [ATCC
27853], Escherischia coli (Gram-negative) [ATCC 25922] and Enterococcus faecalis
(Gram-positive) [ATCC 21212]. S. aureus is considered to be one of the most
important pathogenic bacteria and is used as primary bioassay organism for this
reason.
University of Pretoria.etd
43
All these organisms are important nosocomial pathogens widely used in
screening tests (Table 4.1) and are reference isolates recommended by the National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, USA [NCCLS, 1990].
Table 4.1: Test organisms widely used in screening tests
Vlietinck [1995] Fourie et al. [1992] Wallhäuser [1966]
Microsporium canis Microsporium gypseum
Trichophyton mentagrophytes
Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Candida albicans Candida albicans Candida albicans
Escherischia coli Escherischia coli
Streptococcus pyogenes
Aspergillus niger
Bacillus subtilis
Micrococcus flavus
Saccaromyces cerivisiae
Sarcina lutea
Previous studies showed inhibition of these four test organisms to different
degrees. The two Gram-positive organisms were more sensitive than the Gram-
negative with S. aureus being the most sensitive (100%) followed by E. faecalis
(36%), E. coli (11%) and P. aeruginosa (3%). It was therefore decided to include a
larger spectrum of organisms (including a fungus) in order to obtain a wider
knowledge of both the spectrum as well as the type of inhibition (bactericidal or
bacteriostatic) that these compounds exhibit. For this reason Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Salmonella typhimurium, Streptococcus faecalis, Shigella sonei, Micrococcus luteus,
Aspergillus niger and A.. fumigatus, Bacillus subtilis and Vibrio cholerae were also
included and were kindly supplied by Mrs. A. Lombard of the Department of
Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria.
University of Pretoria.etd
44
Incubation times and positive controls used in MIC determinations for these
organisms are listed below (Table 4.2).
The cultures were grown at 37ºC and regularly subcultured (1% inoculum) in
Mueller Hilton broth. Every c. 3 months, new cultures of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E.
faecalis and E. coli were obtained from Dr Flavia Huygens, Department Medical
Microbiology, University of Pretoria.
Table 4.2: Incubation periods and positive controls for test organisms used in the
bioassays
ORGANISM POSITIVE CONTROL INCUBATION PERIOD
Aspergillus Amphotericin B 24 hours
Bacillus subtilis Gentamicin 24 hours
Enterococcus faecalis Gentamicin 4 hours
Escherischia coli Gentamicin 4 hours
Klebsiella pneumoniae Gentamicin 4-6 hours
Micrococcus luteus Ampicillin 24 hours
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Gentamicin 4 hours
Salmonella typhimurium Ampicillin 4 hours
Shigella sonei Ampicillin 4 hours
Staphylococcus aureus Ampicillin 4 hours
Streptococcus faecalis Ampicillin 4 hours
Vibrio cholerae Chloramphenicol 12-24 hours
MHB is recommended by the NCCLS for broth dilution susceptibility testing and was
therefore chosen for the bioassays.
University of Pretoria.etd
45
4.5 GROUP SEPARATION OF EXTRACTS
4.5.1 Solvent / solvent extraction
The purpose of this procedure is to simplify extracts by fractionating the
chemical compounds into broad groups based on their solubilities. The
solvent/solvent group separation procedure used by the USA National Cancer
Institute as described by Suffness and Douros [1979] was applied with slight
variation. After extracting the dry leaf material, the acetone extract was taken to
dryness in a Büchi RE-120 rotary evaporator under reduced pressure, rotating at c.
100 rpm and the water bath temperatures initially at 60°C but not exceeding 40°C
when the extract was nearly dry. This extract was dissolved in 1:1 mixture of
chloroform and water and the two phases were separated in a separatory funnel. The
water fraction was mixed with an equal volume of n-butanol in a separatory funnel to
yield the water [W] and butanol [B] fractions. The chloroform fraction was taken to
dryness in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure as described above and
extracted with an equal volume of hexane and 10% water/methanol mixture. This
yielded the hexane [H] fraction and the 10% water/methanol mixture was diluted to
20% water/ methanol by the addition of water. This was then mixed with carbon
tetrachloride in the separatory funnel to yield the carbon tetrachloride [CT] fraction.
The 20% water/methanol was further diluted to yield a mixture of 35% water/
methanol and mixed with chloroform to yield the chloroform [CL] and 35% water in
methanol [WM] fractions. In all cases, equal volumes of solvents were used and the
process repeated until the extracting solution was light in colour. In some cases
centrifugation had to be applied to separate the solvent phases.
University of Pretoria.etd
46
For quantitative determination, extractants were placed in pre-weighed flasks and the
solvents removed under vacuum in the rotary evaporator. The extracts were later
redissolved in acetone or acetone/water for further analysis. The process is
schematically represented in Figure 4.1.
From previous studies with S. aureus as test organism, the chloroform soluble
fraction contained by far the largest quantity of inhibiting components (100%),
followed by the fractions soluble in water (23%), 35% methanol in water (18%),
carbon tetrachloride (2%) and hexane (traces) [Martini, 1998]. Due to the relatively
low complexity of the hexane fraction (one inhibitory compound) and the great
diversity of inhibitory compounds present in the chloroform fraction, these two
fractions were evaluated further. Bioassay-guided fractionation was used throughout
the study.
4.5.2 Analysis and bioassay of fractions
The hexane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, butanol and 35% water/methanol
fractions were dissolved in 100% acetone. The water fraction was dissolved in 30%
acetone in water. Thin layer chromatography [5 µl of 100 mg/ml extract] was on
Merck TLC F254 plates with acetone:methylene dichloride (2:3), chloroform:ethyl
acetate:formic acid (5:4:1) and benzene:ethanol:ammonium chloride (9:1:1%). In
some cases ethylacetate:methanol:water (40:5.4:4) and other variations thereof were
used for comparison. Separated components were visualised under visible and
ultraviolet light [254 and 360 nm, Camac Universal UV lamp TL-600]. Plates were
then sprayed with 0.36% vanillin, 3.6% sulphuric acid in methanol and heated at
100°C for 2-5 minutes [Carr and Rogers, 1986]. Minimum inhibitory concentrations
were determined by means of serial dilution as described in paragraph 4.4.1.
University of Pretoria.etd
47
SOLVENT/SOLVENT EXTRACTION
Figure 4.1: The procedure used for solvent/solvent fractionation
Extract with acetone 10:1
Dry in vacuo Dissolve in 1:1 chloroform
water
Chloroform component Concentrate to dryness
Add hexane and 10%water in
Water component Add n-butanol
Hexane fraction
10% water in methanol dilute to 20% water in
methanol
n-Butanol fraction
Water fraction
Carbon tetrachloride fraction
20% water in methanol Dilute to 35% water in methanol
Add chloroform
Chloroform fraction 35% water in methanol fraction
University of Pretoria.etd
48
4.6 ISOLATION OF BIOACTIVE COMPONENTS
4.6.1 Column chromatography
Column chromatography (CC) is the most widely used technique to isolate the
components of complex mixtures (preparative chromatography). CC can also be used
to determine the quantity of different compounds present in the mixture (analytical
chromatography). Various stationary phases were used to separate compounds either
according to polarity (normal and reverse phase silica gel, Sephadex) or size of
compounds (Toyopearl - size-exclusion chromatography).
After solvent-solvent group fractionation (paragraph 4.5.1), the fractions were
dried in the Büchi rotary evaporator to determine the mass extracted in each solvent.
Initially the hexane fraction was chosen for column chromatography due to its
relatively low complexity as seen with TLC and bioautography. Later the chloroform
fraction was also employed in column chromatography.
In order to select the best mobile phase for eluting the hexane fraction, 5 µl of a
100 mg/ml solution was spotted on TLC and ran with combinations of solvents. In
this way the solvent system that exhibited the most favourable separation of
compounds was chosen.
In all cases a filter (Whatman filter no. 2) was cut to size and inserted at both
the bottom and top of the stationary phase to prevent disruption during elution of the
compounds.
Schematic presentations of the methods employed in separating and analysing
the various fractions are depicted in Figures 4.2 and 4.3 at the end of the chapter.
University of Pretoria.etd
49
4.6.1.1 Silica gel
Silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 0.015-0.04 mm) was suspended in required solvent and
left for c. 2 hours to swell after which it was poured into the column. The fraction
obtained during solvent/solvent extraction was suspended in the minimum amount of
particular solvent in which it would dissolve and filtered to remove impurities and any
large particles which could cause diffusion problems whilst developing the column.
This fraction was applied to the top of the column using a pipette with great care as
not to disturb the top of the column. After application, the solvent flask was raised to
facilitate solvent flow into the column and was run either using gravitational force or
with pressure by connecting a Labotec pump to the column to facilitate elution. In the
case where BEA was used as eluent, the column was developed in a fume hood to
limit toxic benzene vapours in the atmosphere.
A concentration gradient of eluents was used. With the hexane fraction a 500
ml mixture of hexane:methylene dichloride (1:1) was used, gradually introducing a
mixture of acetone:methylene dichloride (1:1). 100% acetone was introduced next and
finally methanol was added to elute any components that could not be moved with the
other solvents. The column was left to run overnight, connected to a fraction
collector, at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min.
The chloroform fraction was run initially with 40% hexane in dichloromethane
(DCM), gradually increasing the DCM concentration to 100%. Methanol was
introduced initially at 5% and increasing to a final concentration of 80% methanol in
DCM.
University of Pretoria.etd
50
4.6.1.2 Sephadex
Sephadex LH-20 [Fluka ] was employed in separating the chloroform fraction.
It was poured into the column in the dry state and the solvent added thereafter. A
gradient was used starting with 100% hexane, 1:1 hexane to chloroform and then
gradually increasing the chloroform to 100%. Methanol was added in small
increments starting with 5% in chloroform and increasing to 100%.
4.6.1.3 Reverse phase
Bondesil C18 (40µm preparative grade) silica was used as reverse phase
stationary phase. Reverse phase elutes the most polar compounds first and was thus
employed in separating polar compounds not eluted with normal phase silica.
The stationary phase was mixed with 10% water in methanol and poured into a
column. After a filter (Whatman filter paper no. 2) was cut to size and inserted at the
top of the column, glass beads were thrown on top of the column to hold down the
stationary phase. A small polypropylene pre-column was inserted on top of the main
column containing the same stationary phase as that of the main column. The sample
was applied to this pre-column and eluted with solvents to remove impurities and
large particles thus preventing adsorption of compounds on the main column. Once
fully eluted, the column was connected to the Labotec pump and solvent was pumped
through to wash the column.
University of Pretoria.etd
51
4.6.1.4 Toyopearl
Toyopearl HW-40F has a particle size of 45 µm and is supplied as a suspension
in 20% ethanol. Toyopearl is a semirigid, macroporous, spherical resin synthesized
from a hydrophilic vinyl copolymer exclusively composed of C, H and O atoms and is
an excellent resin for the separation of biomolecules [Toyopearl information
brochure].
A long burette was filled with Toyopearl and allowed to settle. Acetone (100%)
was pushed through the burette using medium pressure (Labotec pump was connected
to the burette) to replace the ethanol. The sample was dried using nitrogen gas to c.
0.5 ml and applied to the top of the column by means of a Pasteur pipette. The flow
rate was adjusted to 100 drops/minute and samples were collected by means of
fraction collector.
4.6.2 Analysis and concentration of fractions
As soon as column chromatography was completed, test-tubes were placed
under a stream of air to facilitate concentration of the fractions for TLC analysis and
bioassay. After c. 40% of the volume of the eluent had evaporated, every second
fraction was analysed by TLC using c. 0.1% of each fraction. In some cases test-tubes
were not pre-weighed and the fractions were not dried, therefore it was not possible to
determine the exact concentration applied to the TLC plates. Fractions were analysed
using BEA (9:1:1%), CEF (5:4:1) and 2A:3MDC as described in paragraph 4.3.
EMW (45:5:4.4) was also attempted but with poor results. Separated components
were sprayed with vanillin reagent.
University of Pretoria.etd
52
4.6.3 Combination of fractions
From TLC results, fractions were combined according to their separation
profile. Combined fractions were placed under an air current to facilitate drying. Once
dry, the components were weighed to calculate the total mass extracted, dissolved in
the minimum amount of acetone possible and transferred to a glass vial with a screw
top to prevent evaporation.
4.6.4 Preparative TLC
Fractions were dissolved in the smallest amount of solvent (usually acetone) in
which it would dissolve (c. 1 ml) and applied in a band across the preparative TLC
plate (Silica gel 60 F254) starting and ending at least 1 cm from either side. The plate
was developed repetitively (at least three times) in the mobile phase and the bands
visualised under ultraviolet light (254 and 360 nm). A small section on the side of the
plate was sprayed with vanillin and heated with a heating gun, whilst protecting the
rest of the plate with foil. Components were easily visualised and marked using a soft
2B pencil. After spraying the plate with water to facilitate easier removal of
components, the bands were scraped off the glass plate. The components were
collected into separate beakers and crushed to a fine powder using a glass rod. The
adsorbent powder was eluted with c. 5 ml acetone, depending on the quantity and
pigment recovered by filtration using a sintered glass funnel. The process was
repeated at least twice or until the powder regained its original white colour. This was
followed by 1% acetic acid in methanol for a final rinse to remove any polar
components not removed with acetone. Each component was collected into a separate
vial and concentrated under a stream of cold air.
University of Pretoria.etd
53
4.7 GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC-MS)
A splitless mode was chosen with helium as carrier gas. Initial temperature and
pressure of the front inlet were 250 °C and 115.5 kPa respectively. Injection volume
of the sample was 1.0 microliters and run period c. 48 minutes at a flow rate of 3.4
ml/min. No prior knowledge of compound structure was known and therefore a
steroid method, recommended by Dr. T. Laurens, was chosen as it was thought to be
the most effective in identifying plant-derived compounds. The column was a
capillary column (Model no. J&W 122-1031) of 30.0 m in length, 250 µm diameter
i.d. and 0.10 µm thickness.
Due to the minute quantities required for GC-MS analysis and the difficulty in
weighing such small amounts, quantitative analysis was not possible. A small quantity
of the fraction precipitate was taken, dissolved in the smallest quantity of chloroform
into which would go, vortexed and injected onto the capillary column for detection.
Later, 100µl of N-trimethylsilylimidazole (TMSI) was used to dissolve the dry
precipitate. This was left overnight in an oven at 100°C and injected the following
morning onto the GC-MS column. Polar compounds have a tendency to adsorb onto
the support surface causing distorted peaks, which are broadened and often exhibit a
tail. These support materials can be deactivated by silanization with TMSI, which has
a strong affinity for polar organic molecules and tends to retain them by adsorption.
The supernatant, which was already dissolved in acetone, was also injected onto GC-
MS to compare peaks found in the precipitate. The MS was programmed to
incorporate the solvent after a delay of 3 minutes.
University of Pretoria.etd
54
4.8 HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC)
Analysis was performed on a Hewlett Packard 1050 HPLC with a Luna 5u C18
(250 mm x 4.60 mm i.d.) Phenomenex (U.K.) column. Fractions were diluted five to
ten times before injection onto the column and eluted with 10% water: 90% methanol.
Temperature was kept off during the run and average run time was 25 minutes.
Parameters were set as follows: flow rate: between 1.0 and 2.0 ml/min with an
average of 1.5 ml/min; minimum and maximum pressure limits at 20 and 400 bar
respectively. The multiple wavelength detector (MWD) was set to measure signals at
wavelengths of 204 nm and 254 nm. Fluorescence detection (FLD) was set at Em: 345
nm and Ex: 254 nm. Solvents used were Riedel-de-Häen HPLC grade [Merck].
4.9 NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE (NMR)
After column chromatography, precipitation of some fractions began to take
place. These precipitates were collected, cleaned using various solvent systems
starting with non-polar solvents e.g. hexane and then introducing ethanol, methanol,
ethyl acetate, chloroform and acetone. The samples were passed through a Pasteur
pipette plugged with cotton wool to facilitate the removal of impurities. The clean
samples were weighed and dissolved in maximum 2 ml deuterated solvents used for
NMR [Merck]. In the studies, DMSO-d6 was used as the solvent of choice, although
other solvents were also attempted, because of its good ability to dissolve a wide
range of compounds. The samples were then pipetted into NMR tubes [Wilmad,
economy] with the aid of a Pasteur pipette and sent to Mr Eric Palmer of the
Chemistry department, University of Pretoria. 1H NMR was run at either 300 or 400
MHz and 13C at 75 MHz using the solvent signal as reference. Structures were
elucidated by Dr D. Katerere (Department of Pharmacology).
University of Pretoria.etd
55
4.10 MASS SPECTROMETRY (MS)
High Resolution Electron Impact Mass Spectroscopy (HREIMS) was performed
on samples sent for analysis using a MASPEC II system [II32/A002]. Dr P. Boshoff
from the Cape Technikon and Dr D. Katerere of the University of Pretoria, performed
the analysis.
4.11 VARIATION IN BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY
Previous studies compared the antibacterial activity of the leaves of seven
different C. erythrophyllum trees situated in the University of Pretoria grounds.
Results showed no difference in antibacterial activity but the TLC plates did show
slight variations. Comparisons of trees growing in different areas of Pretoria as well
as those present in other provinces were therefore carried out to determine whether
other factors such as climactic and soil conditions would cause any differences in
biological activity. Conditions of age and state of development among many other
things can affect the bioactivity of plant material and the levels of secondary
metabolites can differ with these parameters.
Plant material from each specimen was dried, ground to a fine powder (as
described in section 4.1 and 4.2) and 500 mg was extracted with 5 ml acetone by
shaking for 5 minutes on a shaking apparatus. The extracts were centrifuged for five
minutes at 3500 rpm, the process repeated three times and the extracts decanted and
combined. The extracts were transferred to pre-weighed glass vials and evaporated to
dryness under a stream of air. Extracts were dissolved in acetone to produce a 100 mg
extract/ml solution and 5 µl applied to Merck TLC F254 plates. These extracts were
used in bioautography and MICs calculated according to the procedure described in
sections 4.4.1 and 4.4.2.
University of Pretoria.etd
56
4.12 TOXICITY ASSAY
Toxicity of fractions was determined by the lactate dehydrogenase assay, which
requires the use of human neutrophils at a concentration of 1 x 107 cells/ml. This
assay was chosen for its simplicity and ease of determination as no specialised
equipment is required. It is also a rather fast test, which allows for several
determinations in a short span of time.
4.12.1 Cell separation
Heparinized blood was taken from healthy volunteers and diluted in a ratio of
1:2 with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The diluted blood was layered onto Ficoll
(Histopaque 1077, Sigma Diagnostics) in a ratio of 2:1 and centrifuged for 30 minutes
at 2100 rpm (1000xg). The serum was discarded up to 2 mm from the top layer and
the mononuclear cells were aspirated and removed into a clean 50 ml tube. The
suspension was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1200 rpm (400xg) after adding 40 ml
PBS and the resulting pellet (lymphocytes and monocytes) washed again with PBS.
Lysis buffer (0.83% (w/v) NH4Cl) was added to the remaining cells to induce
hypotonic lysis of the contaminating erythrocytes and suspended cells were incubated
on ice for 5-6 minutes before centrifuging for 5 minutes at 1000 rpm. This procedure
was repeated and the remaining pellet resuspended in 1-5 ml PBS after which cells
were counted and adjusted to a concentration of 107/ml with PBS. All cells were kept
in an ice bath prior to use.
University of Pretoria.etd
57
4.12.2 Lactate dehydrogenase assay (LDH)
Neutrophils (107 cells/ml) were incubated with Hanks’ balanced salt solution
(HBSS) for 5 minutes at 37°C in a ratio of 1:4 i.e. 20 µl cells + 80 µl HBSS. As a
positive control, 20µl lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) was added to one ependorff
tube and the volume adjusted to 200µl with HBSS. Two other controls were selected,
one with distilled water and the other with the same ratio of DMSO to water in which
the compounds were brought to solution and 100 µl of each added to their respective
tubes. In the other ependorffs 100 µl of the test compounds were added into their
respective tubes to make up a final concentration of 100 µg/ml. The tubes were
incubated for a further 10 minutes at 37°C after which they were centrifuged at 1000
rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant (100 µl) of each was pipetted and transferred to a
microplate into which 100 µl PBS was added. Into each well 20 µl of NADH (1.3
mg/ml) was added and just before reading 20 µl pyruvate (1.1 mg/ml) was added to
initiate the reaction. The microplate was read at 340 nm at time 0, 1, 5 and 10 minutes
and measurements were done in triplicate.
4.13 ANTIOXIDANT / ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY
4.13.1 Serum opsonization of Zymosan
Zymosan A (Sigma Chemical Co.) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 mg/ml),
boiled for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 900 rpm for 5 minutes until sedimented. The
zymosan was washed with 10 ml PBS and resuspended before spinning off again at
900 rpm for 5 minutes. Freshly pooled serum (10 ml) from a healthy volunteer was
added to the zymosan and incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C.
University of Pretoria.etd
58
After centrifugation (900 rpm, 5 minutes), the supernatant was discarded and the
pellet washed twice with PBS before finally resuspending in saline solution at a
concentration of 2.5 mg/ml and used as the serum opsonized zymosan (SOZ).
4.13.2 Preparation of test compounds and chemiluminescence assay
Isolated test compounds were dissolved in DMSO and distilled water to yield a
concentration of 200 µg/ml. The final concentration for each stimulant in solution
with lymphocytes was: SOZ, 279 µg/ml and compounds, 50 µg/ml.
In each cuvette 100 µl of the cell suspension (2 x 106 cells/ml), was incubated with
100 µl luminol (5-amino-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthlazindione; Sigma; final concentration
10-4 M) and the test compounds (100 µl) for 30 minutes at 37°C. The cuvettes were
inserted in the chemiluminometer and the stimulant (SOZ) added just before
recording. A sample that was not stimulated with SOZ but contained cells, luminol
and RPMI to adjust the volume was included as the blank control. Two other
controls, one containing RPMI instead of test compound and the other DMSO and
water in the same concentration used to suspend compounds, were also included in
the assay. Measurements were done in triplicate and each sample measured for 30
minutes using a luminescence assay. All buffers and reagents used from the same
batch to limit variations in results. The peak response (peak CL) and the time for peak
CL (peak time, minutes) were read from the recorder (BioORbit Oy, 1991).
University of Pretoria.etd
59
FRACTIONS COLLECTED & COMBINED (A – P) FRACTIONS COLLECTED & COMBINED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FRACTIONS I – VII FRACTIONS A1 - E5 HPLC, NMR & MS Figure 4.2: Schematic presentation of the compound isolation procedure followed with the hexane fraction of C. erythrophyllum, following solvent-solvent fractionation
HEXANE FRACTION
SILICA COLUMN Gradient elution with Hex:Acn (1:1);
Acn:MeOH (1:1); acetone and methanol
FRACTION C: SILICA COLUMN Elution with BEA (1:9:1%) and final rinse with
methanol
PREPARATIVE TLC
TOYOPEARL SEPARATION
GC-MS
University of Pretoria.etd
60
Figure 4.3: Schematic presentation of the compound isolation procedure followed using the chloroform fraction of C. erythrophyllum, following solvent- solvent fractionation
CHLOROFORM FRACTION
SILICA COLUMN COLUMN I (CE)
Fractions collected and combined
CE 143-170 (Sephadex) COLUMN II / SEPH I
CE 187-207 (Sephadex) COLUMN III / SEPH II
CE 221-253 (Silica) COLUMN IV
COLUMN IIIa
FRACTIONS COMBINED SEPH II fractions 1 -4
CE-207 (Reverse phase) RP-COLUMN
University of Pretoria.etd