chapter 4 screening, isolation and formulation of...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 4
SCREENING, ISOLATION AND FORMULATION OF
BIOSURFACTANT-PRODUCING MICROBIAL CONSORTIA
4.1 ABSTRACT
Soil samples were collected from various points near a refinery site, petroleum depot,
petrol bunk and automobile workshop for the isolation of biosurfactant-producing bacteria.
Microbial specimens were isolated using the method of serial dilution. The isolated bacteria were
cultured for seven days in MSM containing diesel as the sole carbon source. The isolated
cultures were tested for their ability to produce biosurfactant using the following analytical
methods: oil spreading technique, blood agar haemolysis test, drop collapse test, CTAB agar
plate test, tilted glass slide test and determination of emulsification index and surface activity.
The morphology of the colonies was studied and standard biochemical tests were
performed. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed and the sequence was compared with
NCBI GenBank entries by using the BLAST algorithm. One of the main objectives of the
research work was to develop a consortium of microbial isolates with the highest biodegradation
efficiency. Bacillus siamensis was made part of all microbial combinations. Of the two Bacillus
subtilis isolates, the better isolate, in terms of higher reduction of surface tension and better
emulsification index was chosen. This isolate was Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum. In
similar lines, of the two Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, the better was chosen. This isolate
was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Different combinations of the three isolates were formulated for
development of microbial consortia. The development of microbial consortia was made solely to
study the efficiency of biodegradation of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
The role of plasmid DNA in the production of biosurfactants was verified. The method of
alkaline lysis was used to extract plasmid DNA from each of the bacterial isolates. The samples
were loaded onto an agarose gel and subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. When the gel was
checked for the presence of bands on the agarose gel, none were observed.
4.2 INTRODUCTION
Soils rich in hydrocarbons like those contaminated with petroleum spillages are a good
source of microbes acclimatized to utilize the hydrocarbons for their metabolism. Many
researchers have isolated a range of novel bacterial specimens that produce extracellular
biosurfactants which in turn can increase the bioavailability of the hydrocarbons.
Seventeen biosurfactant-producing bacterial isolates were isolated from terrestrial and
marine samples contaminated with crude oil or its byproducts in a study by Batista et al., 2006.
All the isolates had produced emulsions with kerosene and twelve exhibited high emulsion-
stabilizing capacity. Eight isolates were capable of reducing the surface tension below 40 mN/m.
Five of these eight exhibited this property in cell-free filtrates. They had concluded that isolation
from petroleum contaminated sites proved to be a rapid and effective manner to identify bacterial
isolates with potential industrial applications.
Two biosurfactant-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were isolated from
Kuwaiti oil-contaminated soil, which resulted from the Gulf War (Yateem et al., 2002). When
they optimized the environmental conditions that supported the growth and surfactant
production, it was found that the two isolates differed in their biosurfactant-stimulating carbon
source, nitrogen concentration. The biosurfactant produced by one of the strains was found to be
very effective in the emulsification of crude oil.
A total of fifteen oil mixed soil samples were screened and nine bacterial biosurfactant
producing strains were identified (Tambekar and Gadakh, 2012) as Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Aneurinibacillus miugulanus, Achromobacter insolitus, Bacillus shackletonii,
Ochromobactrum intermedium, Ochromobactrum oryzae by biochemical tests and 16S rRNA
sequencing. Reduction in surface tension was found to be 47–60 mN/m. They could form a
stable emulsion with motor oil.
Biosurfactant production-cum-diesel biodegradation was explored by Moliterni et al.,
2012, using mixed microbial consortia from polluted sites. After designing three microbial
consortia enrichment in diesel, batch experiments were done to study the effects of three
variables (temperature, hydrocarbon concentration and the origin of the consortia) on the diesel
biodegradation and the surface tension evolution. The three enriched consortia contained similar
bacterial genera and degraded diesel with similar efficiencies (approximately 90%). All three
consortia were found to be efficient biosurfactants producers.
Naphthalene degrading bacterial consortium was developed by enrichment culture
technique from sediment collected from the Alang-Sosiya ship breaking yard, Gujarat, India
(Vilas Patel et al., 2012). 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the consortium consisted of
Achromobacter sp., Pseudomonas sp., Enterobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp.. The consortium
was able to degrade 1000 ppm of naphthalene in BH medium containing peptone (0.1%) as co-
substrate. The consortium was able to utilize other aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons such as
benzene, phenol, carbazole, petroleum oil, diesel fuel, and phenanthrene and 2-methyl
naphthalene as sole carbon source.
Three bacterial isolates capable of utilizing used engine-oil as a carbon source were
isolated from contaminated soils using the enrichment technique (Mandri and Lin, 2007). Three
isolates were identified as Flavobacterium sp., Acinetobacterium calcoaceticum and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on biochemical tests and 16S rRNA sequencing. It was found
that A.calcoaceticum and a consortium of the isolates were capable of utilizing 80 and 90% of
used engine oil, respectively, under laboratory conditions in a 4-week period.
Mohammad Abdel-Mawgoud et al., 2008, isolated Bacillus subtilis BS5, from soil which
produced a promising yield of surfactin in mineral salts medium. When they tested for the
presence of plasmid, no plasmid could be detected in the tested isolate, revealing that
biosurfactant production by B. subtilis isolate BS5 is chromosomally mediated but not plasmid-
mediated.
A review by Oluwafemi and Lateef, 2010 presents a deeper analysis on the role of
plasmid in degradation. The degradation of many xenobiotic and hydrocarbon compounds is
known to be mediated by plasmid-encoded enzymes. It has been proven that high level of
plasmid involvement in the degradation of naphthalene and other 2- and 3-ring PAHs. Many of
these are megaplasmids, of linear configuration, encoding part or the whole genes for the
complete pathways.
Padmapriya et al., 2011 worked on Proteus inconstans from which a plasmid with 1.8
kbp was isolated and was cured by acridine orange. Biodegradation and biosurfactant activities
were totally inhibited. Hence, it was determined that the biosurfactant production was purely
plasmid-mediated.
4.3 SCREENING, ISOLATION AND FORMULATION OF BIOSURFACTANT-
PRODUCING MICROBIAL CONSORTIA
For the isolation of biosurfactant-producing bacteria, the samples were collected from
various points near a refinery site, a petroleum depot, a local petrol bunk and an automobile
workshop, as outlined in Section 3.3. The microbes were isolated through serial dilution and
incubated at 25˚C, for 48 hr, as given in Section 3.4. The isolates are then inoculated in MSM
containing 2% (v/v) filtered diesel as the sole carbon source for a duration of 7 days, as described
in Section 3.5. The isolates were screened for the production of biosurfactant using a range of
qualitative and quantitative tests like oil spreading technique, blood agar haemolysis test, drop
collapse test, CTAB agar plate test, tilted glass slide test, emulsification index and determination
of surface activity (Section 3.6).
The morphology of the colonies was studied and standard biochemical tests were
performed. Under the morphological aspects, the colour, shape, size, surface, edge, opacity,
degree of growth and elevation of the colonies were observed and noted. 16S rRNA gene
sequencing was performed at Agharkar Research Institute (Pune, India) to identify the bacterial
strain. PCR was carried out using the universal primers for 1.5 kb fragment amplification for
eubacteria. The PCR product was then processed for cycle sequencing reaction. The sequencing
output was analyzed using the DNA sequence analyzer software. The sequence was compared
with NCBI GenBank entries by using the BLAST algorithm. The consortia are formulated taking
into consideration their genus and specific properties.
Plasmid DNA was extracted from all the isolates using the method of alkaline lysis, as
outlined in Section 3.7. After the samples were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, the gel
was observed using a UV transilluminator.
4.4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.4.1 Isolation of microorganisms from the sample
At the end of the incubation period, a total of twenty three different types of colonies
were selected for further analysis. They were named RT1 through RT23.
4.4.2 Screening for Biosurfactant Production
4.4.2.1 Oil Spreading Technique
Of the twenty three isolates, four samples (RT7, RT9, RT10 and RT21) significantly
displaced the oil layer and started to spread in the water, showing a zone of displacement. The
results of the oil displacement test showed the pattern as given in Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1 Results of Oil spread test
Morikawa et al. (2000) showed that the area of displacement by a biosurfactant-
containing solution is directly proportional to the concentration of the biosurfactants tested.
Strains secreting a higher concentration of biosurfactant as indicated by the oil spreading test had
low surface tension values. This, plus the fact that the diameter of the clear zone is proportional
to the concentration of a standard biosurfactant, indicated that the oil spreading technique is a
consistent method to detect biosurfactant production. All the images are shown in Appendix 1.
4.4.2.2 Blood Agar Haemolysis Test
Of the twenty three isolates, fifteen strains showed clear zones around the streaks,
confirming the exhibition of partial to considerable hemolytic activity. Five strains (RT3, RT7,
RT10, RT19 and RT21) displayed a high degree of hemolysis. The results of the blood agar
haemolysis test are shown in Figure 4.2. All the images are shown in Appendix 1.
Figure 4.2 Results of Blood agar hemolysis test
However, not all biosurfactants have a hemolytic activity and compounds other than
biosurfactants may cause hemolysis (Youssef et al., 2004). In their study, sixteen percent of the
strains that lysed blood agar tested negative for biosurfactant production with the other two
methods and had little reduction in surface tension (values above 60 mN/m). Thirty eight percent
of the strains that did not lyse blood agar tested positive for biosurfactant production with the
other two methods and had surface tension values as low as 35 mN/m.
4.4.2.3 Drop Collapse Test
Of the twenty three isolates, six specimens (RT3, RT7, RT9, RT10, RT19 and RT21)
showed appreciable effect on the glass slide. The drop collapsed completely after an hour. The
results of the drop collapse test are depicted in Figure 4.3.
Figure 4.3 Results of Drop collapse test
The use of the drop collapse method as a primary method to detect biosurfactant
producers, followed by the determination of the biosurfactant concentration using the oil
spreading technique, constitutes a quick and easy protocol to screen and quantify biosurfactant
production (Youssef et al., 2004). Their study had concluded that the drop collapse method may
not be as sensitive as the oil spreading technique in detecting low levels of biosurfactant
production. All the images are shown in Appendix 1.
4.4.2.4 CTAB Agar Plate Test
Of the twenty three isolates, five strains (RT3, RT7, RT9, RT16 and RT21) were
surrounded by considerable bluish-green halos implying good production of extracellular
biosurfactants. The results of the agar plate test are shown in Figure 4.4. All the images are
shown in Appendix 1.
Figure 4.4 Results of CTAB Agar plate test
4.4.2.5 Tilted Glass Slide Test
Of the twenty three isolates, water flowed over the following seven specimens, possibly
indicating the production of an extracellular biosurfactant. The seven isolates are RT3, RT7,
RT9, RT10, RT16, RT19 and RT21. All the images are shown in Appendix 1.
4.4.2.6 Emulsification Index
Of the twenty three isolates, nine strains (RT3, RT7, RT9, RT10, RT11, RT16, RT17,
RT19 and RT21) showed a significant value of emulsification index. The emulsification indices
of the culture supernatants showed the following pattern, as depicted in Figure 4.5. All the
images are shown in Appendix 1.
Figure 4.5 Emulsification Indices of the isolates
4.4.2.7 Determination of Surface Activity
Of the twenty three isolates, seven strains (RT3, RT7, RT9, RT10, RT16, RT19 and
RT21) showed a significant reduction of surface tension values, indicating that the microbe may
be producing an extracellular biosurfactant. The surface tension values of culture supernatants
are shown below in Figure 4.6. The percentage reduction of surface tension has been depicted in
Figure 4.7. All the images are shown in Appendix 1.
Figure 4.6 Surface activity of the isolates
Figure 4.7 Percentage reduction of Surface tension by the isolates
4.4.3 Selection of Microbial Strains
All the tests performed have been used in various studies for preliminary screening of
biosurfactant producers. Though the tests indicate biosurfactant production to various degrees of
sensitivity, the isolates that show consistent results in all the seven tests were chosen. Based on
the results of the seven screening tests including the measurements of surface tension reduction,
the following microbial specimens were chosen for further experimentation: RT3, RT7, RT9,
RT10, RT16, RT19 and RT21.
4.4.4 Morphological Study of Isolates
The basic morphological features of the strains were studied and summarized in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Morphological observations of the microbial strains
RT3
RT7
RT9
RT10
RT16
RT19
RT21
Colour Pale yellow Creamy Off
white
Creamy Off
white
Creamy Creamy
Size 1.3 mm 1 mm 2 mm 1.1 mm 1.8 mm 1 mm 1.2 mm
Shape Circular Circular Bead Circular Bead Circular Circular
Microscopic
Observation
(shape)
Rods
&
Cocci
Rods Rods Rods Rods Rods Rods
Surface Shiny &
Smooth
Dull &
Rough Dull Wrinkled Dull
Dull &
Rough
Dull &
Rough
Texture Dry Dry Dry Moist Dry Dry Dry
Edge Undulate Rhizoid Entire Entire Entire Undulate Rhizoid
Elevation Flat Convex Raised
/Plateaux
Convex Raised
/Plateaux
Flat Convex
Opacity Translucent Translucent Opaque Opaque Opaque Translucent Translucent
Degree of
Growth
Scant Profuse Scant Scant Scant Profuse Profuse
4.4.5 Biochemical Characterization of Isolates
The basic biochemical tests were conducted on the strains and the results have been enlisted
below. The images pertaining to the biochemical tests for all the isolates are shown in Appendix
2.
4.4.5.1 Isolate RT3
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-negative
Motility Test: Non-motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Negative (Cannot hydrolyze starch since it cannot produce
amylase & hence, no zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Negative (Cannot hydrolyze casein since it cannot produce
casesase & hence, no zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
negative (Tube turns copper colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Negative (Cannot produce both nitrate reductase and nitrite
reductase and hence, no change of tube colour and no gas collection in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Negative (Oxidase cytochrome is absent and hence, oxidase reagent strip
remains colourless)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Positive (Abundant growth was observed on the Simmons Citrate
agar slant and the medium changes from green to blue indicating use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (Upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were not observed.
4.4.5.2 Isolate RT7
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-positive
Motility Test: Motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes starch since it can produce amylase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes casein since it can produce casesase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
positive (Tube turns red colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Positive (Produces both nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase
and hence, tube changes to red colour and gas collection is observed in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Negative (Oxidase cytochrome is absent and hence, oxidase reagent strip
remains colourless)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Positive (Abundant growth was observed on the Simmons Citrate
agar slant and the medium changes from green to blue indicating use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (The upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow
color)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were observed near the terminal regions of some cells.
4.4.5.3 Isolate RT9
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-negative
Motility Test: Motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Negative (Cannot hydrolyze starch since it cannot produce
amylase & hence, no zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes casein since it can produce casesase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
negative (Tube turns copper colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Negative (Cannot produce both nitrate reductase and nitrite
reductase and hence, no change of tube colour and no gas collection in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Positive (Oxidase cytochrome is present and hence, oxidase reagent strip
changes from colourless to purple)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Positive (Abundant growth was observed on the Simmons Citrate
agar slant and the medium changes from green to blue indicating use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (The upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow
color)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were not observed.
4.4.5.4 Isolate RT10
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-positive
Motility Test: Non-motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Negative (Cannot hydrolyze starch since it cannot produce
amylase & hence, no zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Negative (Cannot hydrolyze casein since it cannot produce
casesase & hence, no zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
positive (Tube turns red colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Negative (Cannot produce both nitrate reductase and nitrite
reductase and hence, no change of tube colour and no gas collection in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Negative (Oxidase cytochrome is absent and hence, oxidase reagent strip
remains colourless)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Negative (Growth was not observed on the Simmons Citrate agar
slant and the medium remains green indicating non-use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (The upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow
color)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were not observed.
4.4.5.5 Isolate RT16
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-negative
Motility Test: Motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Negative (Cannot hydrolyze starch since it cannot produce
amylase & hence, no zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes casein since it can produce casesase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
negative (Tube turns copper colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Negative (Cannot produce both nitrate reductase and nitrite
reductase and hence, no change of tube colour and no gas collection in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Positive (Oxidase cytochrome is present and hence, oxidase reagent strip
changes from colourless to purple)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Positive (Abundant growth was observed on the Simmons Citrate
agar slant and the medium changes from green to blue indicating use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (The upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow
color)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were not observed.
4.4.5.6 Isolate RT19
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-positive
Motility Test: Motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes starch since it can produce amylase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes casein since it can produce casesase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
positive (Tube turns red colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Positive (Produces both nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase
and hence, tube changes to red colour and gas collection is observed in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Negative (Oxidase cytochrome is absent and hence, oxidase reagent strip
remains colourless)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Positive (Abundant growth was observed on the Simmons Citrate
agar slant and the medium changes from green to blue indicating use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (The upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow
color)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were observed near the terminal regions of some cells.
4.4.5.7 Isolate RT21
Gram Staining Reaction: Gram-positive
Motility Test: Motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes starch since it can produce amylase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Casein Hydrolysis Test: Positive (Hydrolyzes casein since it can produce casesase &
hence, a zone of clearing was observed)
Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test: MR-negative (Tube turns yellow colour) and VP-
positive (Tube turns red colour)
Nitrate Reduction Test: Positive (Produces both nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase
and hence, tube changes to red colour and gas collection is observed in Durham tube)
Oxidase Test: Negative (Oxidase cytochrome is absent and hence, oxidase reagent strip
remains colourless)
Catalase Test: Positive (Copious amounts of bubble formation was observed)
Citrate Utilization Test: Positive (Abundant growth was observed on the Simmons Citrate
agar slant and the medium changes from green to blue indicating use of citrate)
Indole production Test: Negative (The upper alcohol layer of the broth turns yellow
color)
Spore-forming ability Test: Spores were observed near the terminal regions of some cells.
From the biochemical tests, the likelihood of genus of the isolated microbial specimens is listed
below
RT3: Inconclusive RT16: Pseudomonas
RT7: Bacillus RT19: Bacillus
RT9: Pseudomonas RT21: Bacillus
RT10: Inconclusive
4.4.6 16S rRNA Identification of the Isolates
Microbial isolates were identified through 16S rRNA analysis. The results have been shown in
Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Results of 16S rRNA identification of isolates
Isolate Genus species
RT 3 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus
RT 7 Bacillus subtilis
RT 9 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
RT 10 Rhodococcus terrae
RT 16 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
RT 19 Bacillus siamensis
RT 21 Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum
The phylogenetic tree for the isolates RT9, RT19 and RT21 are shown in Fig. 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10,
respectively.
Figure 4.8 Phylogenetic tree of Isolate RT9
Figure 4.9 Phylogenetic tree of Isolate RT19
Figure 4.10 Phylogenetic tree of Isolate RT21
4.4.7 Extraction of Plasmid DNA
No bands were observed in all the lanes of the gel. Both high and low molecular weight
plasmids were not observed in the gel. From this observation, it can be safely concluded the
genes responsible for biosurfactant production is not associated with plasmids and must be
located in the chromosomal DNA of the bacterial isolates, tested.
Fleck et al., 2000, when studying biosurfactant production by bacteria isolated from oil-
polluted sites (B.subtilis B1 and P.aeruginosa P1), obtained similar results. Both the strains did
not reveal the presence of plasmids. They had also concluded that the coding genes for
biosurfactant production are located in the chromosomal DNA. Likewise, no plasmids were
observed by Mohammad Abdel-Mawgoud et al., 2008 from Bacillus subtilis BS5 isolated from
the soil.
During scale-up in industrial operations, genetic instability is one of the major setbacks in
hindering a microbial strain from becoming a robust producer of biosurfactant. Thus, the finding
could be perceived as an advantage from industrial viewpoint. As a consequence, the genes
responsible for reduced surface activity are more stable. Hence, at the production scale,
minimum fluctuation would be encountered.
4.4.8 Development of Microbial Consortia
Bacillus siamensis is reported for the first time for the production of biosurfactant.
Hence, this isolate, RT 19, was made part of all microbial combinations. Of the two Bacillus
subtilis isolates (RT7 and RT21), the better isolate, in terms of higher reduction of surface
tension and better emulsification index (from preliminary screening data – Figures 4.5 and 4.7)
was chosen. The better isolate was Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum (RT 21). In similar lines,
of the two Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (RT9 and RT16), the better isolate in terms of
higher reduction of surface tension and better emulsification index (from preliminary screening
data – Figures 4.5 and 4.7) was chosen. The better isolate was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (RT 9).
Another isolate was found to be Rhodococcus terrae (RT 10). It was previously decided
to continue the research work to relate the effect of swarming motility behavior of the isolates on
the action of biosurfactants. Due to the non-motile nature of R.terrae and minor concerns of
possible pathogenicity, the isolate was dropped from the consortium. The last isolate,
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (RT 3) was also not selected based on similar reasons of non-motile
character.
Different combinations of Bacillus siamensis (RT 19), Bacillus subtilis subsp.
inaquosorum (RT 21) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (RT 9) were formulated for development of
microbial consortia. The development of microbial consortia was made solely to study the
efficiency of biodegradation of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The following was
the choice of consortia:
• CONS 1: RT 19 + RT 21
• CONS 2: RT 19 + RT 9
• CONS 3: RT 19 + RT 21 + RT 9
4.5 CONCLUSION
The bacteria were isolated from different hydrocarbon-contaminated zones such as
refinery site, petroleum depot, petrol bunk and automobile workshop. Serial dilution and plating
led to isolation of twenty three different bacterial isolates. The isolates were screened for the
production of biosurfactants through a series of qualitative tests that followed after they were
grown in MSM. The tests included oil spreading technique, blood agar haemolysis test, drop
collapse test, CTAB agar plate test, tilted glass slide test, emulsification index and determination
of surface activity. The results of the screening tests indicated that seven of the isolates (RT3,
RT7, RT9, RT10, RT16, RT19, and RT21) showed promise in producing significant quantities of
extracellular biosurfactants. The percentage reduction in surface tension of the cell-free broth
after 24 hr, ranged from 49 % to 62%, among the seven isolates.
Morphological features of the selected strains were observed. The standard biochemical
tests were performed that included Gram Staining Reaction, Motility Test, Starch Hydrolysis
Test, Casein Hydrolysis Test, Methyl Red – Voges Proskauer Test, Nitrate Reduction Test,
Oxidase Test, Catalase Test, Citrate Utilization Test, Indole production Test and Spore Forming
ability Test. From the tests, it was concluded that RT7, RT19 and RT21 were Bacilli. RT9 and
RT16 were Pseudomonas isolates.
Sequencing using 16S rRNA technique helped in the complete identification of the seven
isolates. They were identified as: RT3, RT7, RT9, RT10, RT16, RT19 and RT21 were identified
as Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Rhodococcus terrae,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus siamensis and Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum,
respectively. Bacillus siamensis (RT19) has been reported to produce biosurfactant for the first
time, to the best of knowledge. Simlarly, the subsp inaquosorum of B.subtilis is also noted for
the first time, in literature. Different combinations of RT9, RT19 and RT21 were formulated for
development of microbial consortia. The consortium CONS-1 comprised B.siamensis and
B.subtilis subsp. inaquosorum. The consortium CONS-2 was formulated with B.siamensis and
P.aeruginosa. Lastly, the consortium CONS-3 had all the three isolates.
After agarose gel electrophoresis of the samples, the gel, when observed using a UV
transilluminator, did not reveal any bands. It could thus be concluded that the ability of the
bacterial isolates to secrete biosurfactants did not arise from a gene coded on plasmid DNA. In
all probability, the gene responsible for the production of biosurfactant must have been present
on the bulkier chromosomal DNA.