chapter 11 monopolistic competition and product differentiation

22
Chapter 11 Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiati on

Upload: rosamund-barton

Post on 13-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Chapter 11

Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-2

Assumptions of the Monopolistic Competition Model

• Free entry and exit in the long run No barriers to entry

• Many firms, each one small relative to the size of the market Firms will have limited market power.

• Each firm produces a differentiated product Consumers view the goods as close substitutes,

but not perfect substitutes.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-3

Short-Run Profit Maximization for the Monopolistic Competitor

• Product differentiation creates a small amount of market power due to customer loyalty. Even if the firm raises its price, it will still retain

some of its customers.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-4

Economic Efficiency

• Is a monopolistic competitive industry Allocatively efficient? Productively efficient? Technologically efficient?

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-5

Figure 11.3 Short-Run Profits

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-6

Loss Minimization and the Shut-Down Point

• If demand decreases or costs increase, profits will fall. If the demand curve just touches the ATC curve

at the profit-maximizing level of output, the firm will earn normal economic profits.

If the demand curve just touches the AVC curve at the profit-maximizing level of output, the firm will be indifferent between operating and shutting down.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-7

Figure 11.4 Minimizing Losses and Reaching the Shutdown Point

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-8

Monopolistic Competition in the Long Run

• In the short run, monopolistically competitive firms behave much like a monopolist.

• In the long run, however, monopolistic competition differs from monopoly because of free entry into the market.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-9

Firm Entry in Monopolistic Competition

• If firms in a monopolistically competitive market are earning positive economic profits, then new firms will enter the market. Similar to perfect competition

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-10

Figure 11.5 Effects of New Entrants on the Demand for Cheesesteaks at John’s Roast Pork

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-11

Firm Entry in Monopolistic Competition

• An important difference between monopolistic competition and perfect competition is that price does not fall to the minimum point on the long-run average cost curve. The firms are not efficient.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-12

Summary of Monopolistic Competition

• Each firm maximizes profits by producing the output for which MR = MC. Price is determined by the demand curve.

• Long-run entry implies that firms will be driven towards zero economic profits in the long run. P = LAC

• Price will be greater than the minimum point of LAC.

• Firms have different demand and costs, leading to long-run turnover of firms.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-13

Allocative Efficiency

• For monopolistically competitive firms, the profit-maximizing level of output is less than that which minimizes LAC. Monopolistically competitive firms are not

as efficient as perfectly competitive firms.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-14

Figure 11.6 The Long-Run Monopolistic Competition Equilibrium Versus the Perfect Competition Equilibrium

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-15

Excess Capacity

• As a result of underproduction at both the firm and industry level, monopolistically competitive firms are said to exhibit excess capacity. Output could be increased without any

firms earning losses.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-16

The Benefits of Variety

• Is the reduction in efficiency associated with monopolistic competition bad for society?

• Not necessarily: Because consumers value variety, the

benefits of product differentiation may offset the costs of excess capacity.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-17

Table 11.1 Summary of Market Structure Characteristics for Perfect Competition, Monopolistic Competition, and Monopoly

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-18

Advertising: Information or Persuasion?

• Unlike perfectly competitive firms or monopolists, monopolistically competitive firms will advertise to inform customers about their product.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-19

Brand Identity and Brand Loyalty

• The goal of advertising is to create: Brand Identity—the consumer’s ability to

recognize a product and associate it with a specific name.

Brand Loyalty—a consumer’s willingness to remain with a specific product despite the existence of competing products.• Makes demand less elastic

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-20

Types of Advertising

• Informational—increases consumers’ knowledge of important product characteristics and price.

• Persuasive—attempts to alter consumer tastes and preferences by using subjective information.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-21

Summary (cont’d)

• In the long run, because of free entry and exit, monopolistically competitive firms will earn zero economic profits.

• Monopolistically competitive firms are less efficient than perfectly competitive firms. Excess capacity

• Product differentiation offsets some of the loss of efficiency.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 11-22

Summary (cont’d)

• Firms use adverting to differentiate their product from competing products. Informational Persuasive