chapter 1 - introduction [t]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in...

18
Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed to promote such a goal. Implicit in the term ‘‘national defense’’ is the notion of defending those values and ideals which set this Nation apart. For almost two centuries, our country has taken singular pride in the democratic ideals enshrined in its Constitution. . . . It would indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense, we would sanction the subversion of one of those liberties . . . which make the defense of the Nation worthwhile. [United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258, 264 (1968).]

Upload: carol-parrish

Post on 01-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

Chapter 1 - Introduction

[T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed to promote such a goal. Implicit in the term ‘‘national defense’’ is the notion of defending those values and ideals which set this Nation apart. For almost two centuries, our country

has taken singular pride in the democratic ideals enshrined in its Constitution. . . . It would indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense,

we would sanction the subversion of one of those liberties . . . which make the defense of the Nation worthwhile. [United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258, 264

(1968).]

Page 2: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

2

The special legal problems in national security law

Does the US Constitution extend beyond the shores of the US?

Does international law exist, outside of trade? Does the President have unitary national security

powers? Outside the US? Inside the US?

Page 3: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

3

Wisdom v. Legality

What did de Tocqueville mean when he said that Americans confused the question of the existence of a power with the wisdom of its use?

Because we can, should we? Not just a national security question Look at biomedical research

Page 4: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

4

Current and past issues

What are the issues of the day? War on terror - non-state actors Conflict with China and Russia Conflict with allies - Israel, France, Germany

What are past abuses of national security law? What are current practices that may be seen as

abuses in the future?

Page 5: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

5

Historical Context

Our contemporary world was shaped by the cold war following WWII

For a brief period between the fall of the Berlin Wall and 9/11 it looked like we might escape from the cold war mentality

Post 9/11, little is happening that would have been shocking in the 1950s, we just have better technology

All that is missing is ideology Academics are about the only Marxists left Even the Chinese communists are capitalists

Page 6: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

6

Chapter 2 - Providing for the ‘‘Common Defense’’: The Original Understanding

How were most countries governed in the 1400s? What were the justifications for this form of

government? What did the legal philosophers argue were better

forms of government? Why was separation of powers key to these

arguments?

Page 7: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

7

Stopped here

Page 8: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

8

The Nature of War

What is the history of war? Politics by other means? Moral issue?

What is Formal War? What is Informal War?

Why does Informal War pose much more difficult issues for international affairs and international law?

Page 9: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

9

What is the role of the state v. private parties?

What were letters of marque and reprisal? Are wars waged by private parties now? What is the role of private contractors and mercenaries in

Iraq? Afghanistan? Are US private contractors who are injured veterans? Who takes care of their medical needs? What about the non-US employees?

What is the command and control issue with mercenaries?

Page 10: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

10

Independence

What was the legal status of the colonies when they declared independence?

The Continental Congress How was the country governed between

independence and the Articles of Confederation?

What was the fundamental flaw in this system? Why did it almost cost us the revolution?

Page 11: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

11

The Articles of Confederation

What was the role of the states versus the federal government in the Articles of Confederation?

Why did this make it difficult to govern the country?

What external threats were still facing the US? Did we control the continent? Were the European powers at peace?

Page 12: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

12

The Constitution

How did the drafters deal with the problems seen during the Continental Congress era?

What was the relationship between the states and the federal government in the original Constitution? How were powers shared?

What were the founders expectations about the federal government? How did the shape the Constitution?

Page 13: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

13

Standing Armies

What was the colonial experience with standing armies?

What did the founds see as the risks of a standing army? How did the founders deal with that in the

constitution?

Page 14: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

14

Federal Separation of Powers

Three Branches of Government Legislative Judicial Executive

How was separation of powers to protect the nation?

Did the founders anticipate having two branches controlled by the same political party?

Page 15: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

15

Then Versus Now

How has the federal government changed? What are the critical periods for this change? Why does this pose Constitutional problems?

Page 16: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

16

War in the Constitution

Why is the nature of war as understood by the drafters important?

What does this tell us about the congressional power to declare war?

Is this separate from the power to wage war? What about defensive war?

Why is defensive war a special philosophical and religious issue?

Page 17: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

17

Organization of the Military

What fundamental change in the organization of the military was not anticipated by the drafters and which undermines the Constitutional control of war making?

Why does it matter that the congress can now allow a war to be started without having to do it themselves?

Page 18: Chapter 1 - Introduction [T]his concept of ‘‘national defense’’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed

18

Review of Constitutional Provisions

See Links on WWW page