chapter 1 – heritage of law individual and collective impact on changes to the law

25
Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Upload: christine-manning

Post on 16-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law

Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Page 2: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Agenda

1. Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

2. Read Anytus, Meletus and Lycos v. Socrates, 399 BCE, Athens, p.70 in textbook and do ?’s 1-4

Page 3: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Learning Goal for Today

By the end of the lesson, students will be able to explain how law changes and how individuals and collective groups have influenced changes to the law

Page 4: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Expectations Evaluate the influence of individual

citizens who have fought to change the law

Assess the role of collective action in changing the law in democracies

CGE4c – responds to, manages and constructively influences change in a discerning manner

CGe7d – promotes the sacredness of life

Page 5: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Independent Judicial System R. v. Daviault (1994) – SCC

Sexual assault intoxication case – court accepted intoxication defense

Medical history No mens rea

Bill C-72 passed No intoxication defence to anyone

accused of interfering or threatening to interfere with the bodily integrity of another person

Parliamentary Supremacy

Page 6: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*R. v. Ewanchuk (1999) Case about implied sexual consent

Job interview in trailer

Touching, 3 no’s and then didn’t object on 4th attempt

Charged with sexual assault

SCC said no basis in law for implied consent

Page 7: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*R. v. Morgentaler (SCC 1988)

OB-GYN Doctor who did illegal abortions

At time, was illegal to give abortions unless licensed

Case caused problems for gov’ts case, resulted in abortion laws being dropped

Page 8: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Rodriguez v. BC (A.G.) (1992)

s.241 Criminal Code (CC) aid and abetting suicide

Had ALS asked to have s.241 found invalid for violating Charter s.7 (life, liberty), 12 (cruel & unusual punishment) & 15(1) (discrimination based on disability)

In Canada, passive Euthanasia is legal (pulling plug, terminal sedation)

Page 9: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Rodriguez v. BC (A.G.) (1992)

SCC denied request S.7 - is to preserve life not destroy S.12 - cruelty is disease not gov’t

S.15 – too difficult (didn’t really address) More recent case in B.C. Gloria Taylor Superior Court in B.C. struck down

provisions at trial in June 2012 Being Appealed

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Gloria+Taylor+right+question+Ottawa+appeals+assisted+suicide/6930319/story.html

Page 10: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Bill C-384 In 2009 - Bill C-384 was proposed (didn’t

pass) Said doctors wouldn’t face criminal

prosecution for helping a person die: (a) at least 18 (b) after being given or refusing

treatment, (c) continues to "experience severe

physical or mental pain without any prospect of relief,“

(d) or suffers from terminal illness.

Page 11: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Bill C-384

AFEAS (a womens’ rights group) in Quebec favour euthanasia

Page 12: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Bill C-384

Other groups feel that opening the door to active Euthanasia (or assisted suicide) is dangerous and unnecessary

Perverse consequences on vulnerable

Page 13: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Quebec public hearings into euthanasia

Quebec Ministry of Justice – examining “discretion” question

Page 14: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Sauve v. Gov’t of Canada (1993/2002)

1st degree murder, 25-year sentence Wanted to be able to vote Pre-1993 – if in provincial or federal

prison, can’t vote in provincial or federal elections

1993 – SCC said anyone provincial prison can vote

(Write this) 2002 – SCC said now any prisoner can vote in any election

Page 15: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Lobby Groups

Lobby Groups: a person or group, which tried to influence legislators such as lawmakers and governments

Page 16: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Montreal Massacre (1989) Man went into university and shot all

women (didn’t get accepted, blamed them)

Dismissed from army for mental issues

Still had fire arms in house, all legal and registered

Caused Firearms Act in 1995 http://archives.cbc.ca/society/crime_j

ustice/topics/398/

Page 18: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Christopher Stevenson

10 year old boy was kidnapped and murdered by recently released pedophile

Mother wanted to be informed of all sex offenders in community

Led to creation of Ontario Sex Offender Registry (Harper wants to put on-line)

Page 19: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Royal Commissions

Status of Women (1967)

Women could not teach if they were visibly pregnant (up to 1973)

Wage inequality (now improving)

Page 20: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Royal Commissions

Krever Commission (1993) Tainted blood scandal Found Hep C, HIV are blood

transmitted Without screening blood 60,000

people got Hep C and 2,000 people got HIV from blood transfusions

Page 21: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

*Legal ScholarshipBattered Woman’s Syndrome (BWS) –

R. v. LaVallee (1990) LaVallee shot her husband in the

back of the head Justice Wilson, SCC – LaVallee was

able to use defense of self-defense Three conditions must be met…

On-going terror, frequent violence Inability to escape relationship despite

violence Escalating patterns of abuse that put her life

in danger

Page 22: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Other Examples of Collective Action Resulting in Change

Civil Disobedience & Protests in Canada rarely are successful

U.S. Examples American Revolution – Boston Tea Party

(Tax) Civil Rights Movement – Rosa Parks Anti-War Movement

Page 23: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Other Examples of Collective Action Resulting in Change

World Ghandi – peaceful protest & stopped

making salt Arab Spring – Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen

Why isn’t it civil disobedience when first Nations people protest? Because they live in sovereign nations

within Canada

Page 24: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Yet another election comic…

Page 25: Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Individual and Collective Impact on Changes to the Law

Homework Read Anytus, Meletus and Lycos v.

Socrates, 399 BCE, Athens, p.70 in textbook and do ?’s 1-4