channelopathies for clinicians · channelopathies in the heart are inherited genetic disorders of...
TRANSCRIPT
Channelopathies for Clinicians
2nd Philadelphia Cardiovascular SummitNovember 2-3, 2018
Alexander Burashnikov PhD FHRSLankenau Institute for Medical Research
Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University
Disclosure:
None
Channelopathies in the heart are inherited genetic disorders of cardiac ion channels and/or their regulatory proteins predisposing to arrhythmias in the absence of structural heart disease.
Cardiac channelopathies: definition
Other prominent ion channel diseases: • Epilepsy (sodium channel) • Diabetes mellitus (ATP-sensitive potassium channel) • Systic fibrosis (chloride channel)
George et al, J Clin Invest 2013
Ion channels are pore-forming membrane proteins
Ion channels?
ECG and the cardiac action potential
• Long QT syndrome• Brugada syndrome (BrS)• Early repolarization syndrome (ERS) • Short-QT syndrome (SQTS)• Catecholaminergic polymorphic
ventricular tachycardia (CPVT)* * - not a pure channelapathy
Channelopathies in the heart
1) QTc ≥450-480 msQTc > 500 ms – high risk
2) Confirmed pathogenic LQTS mutation, irrespective QTc
Grilo et al, Front Pharm 2010
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)
Diagnosis:
Spears et al, Apl Clin Gen 2014
LQTS phenotype positive patients: the yield of genetic testing is ̴ 80%
LQTS genotype-positive patients: ̴ 25% have QTc interval ≤ 440 ms(most commonly patients with LQT1).
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAl-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS): genetics
> 90% of all genotype positive patients
Min
or L
QTS
gen
es
Recent development…
NIH’S Clinical Genome Resources (ClinGen; Strande et al, Am J Hum Gen 2017) criteria:
Some ultra-rare variants (ANK2,KCNE2, SCN4B, AKAP9, SNTA1, and KCNJ5) have a limited- or disputed-evidence status (as monogenic causes), i.e., variants of unknown significance (VUSs)
Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS): genetics
VUS
VUS
VUS
VUS
VUSVUS
Min
or L
QTS
gen
esContinuous debates…
Strande et al, Am J Hum Gen, 2017Guidicessi et al, Trend Card Med, 2018
Genetic abnormalities may promote acquired long QT syndrome
Acquired long QT syndrome is caused or promoted by: • drugs• hypokalaemia, • bradycardia, exc.
A third of acquired LQTS patients carry congenital LQTS mutations. Most commonly on KCNH2
Itoh et al Eur Heart J, 2016
ER, event rate; F, female; HR, hazard ratio; M, male; MM, multiple mutations, pt, patient.
Genotype and risk stratification in congenital long QT syndrome
Genotyping in long QT patients is recommended: has therapeutic and prognostic values.
Napolitano et al, Curr Opin Card 2018
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAl-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
The risk of arrhythmias is associated with:• type of LQTS (LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3), • location of mutation (pore, C-loop,
etc.). • Number of mutations
Diagnosis: pathogenic LQTS mutation, irrespective QTc. Patients with mutation and QTc<440 ms have a 10-fold increased VT/VF risk vs. controls
• Prevalence: 1:2000
• The longer QT the greater risk of arrhythmias
• Most patients are asymptomatic
• Experience SCD: up to 13%
• The mean time of the first symptom is ̴ 14 years.
• Pre-puberty: The risk of VT/VF is similar in males and femalesPost-puberty: This risk is reduced in males but not in females
• Arrhythmias commonly occur: LQT1 - Exercise LQT2 - Emotion LQT3 - Sleep/Rest
Congenital long QT syndrome: facts/statistics
Burashnikov et al, PACE, 2006
Electrophysiological mechanisms of Torsade de Pointes
Early afterdepolorization (EAD)
Fermini et al, Nat Rev Drug Dis, 2013
Bradycardia and pause-dependent
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAl-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Long QT syndrome: therapy
Recommended:
• A β-blocker • Left cardiac
sympathetic denervation or ICD
First described in 1992 Pedro and Joseph BrugadaBrugada&Brugada, JACC 1992.
This arrhythmic entity was named Brugada Syndrome in 1996Yan & Antzelevitch, Circ 1996; Miyazaki et al, JACC 1996
Originally: • ST segment elevation • Structurally normal heart
Currently:• ST segment elevation • Structural alterations (commonly subtle), particularly in RVOT
Still, most investigators consider Brugada Syndrome as a prime electrical disease
Brugada syndrome (BrS)
Type 1 morphology, an ST segment elevation ≥ 2 mm in ≥1 lead among the right precordial reals V1 and V2 positioned in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th intercostal space occurring spontaneously.
Antzelevitch et al. Heart Rhythm 2016. (J wave syndrome consensus)
Coved type Saddle-backtype
Saddle-backType(Epsilone wave)
Brugada syndrome: diagnosis
Similar ECG pattern:• Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy • Atypical right bundle branch block• Ventricular hypertrophy• Acute myocardial ischemia (especially in RV)• Etc.
Brugada syndrome: diagnosis
Coved type
Needed to be excluded before diagnosis of Brugadasyndrome
When BrS is suspected (without Type 1 ECG pattern), a sodium channel block test should be performed to unmask the disease
Antzelevitch et al. Heart Rhythm 2016. (J wave syndrome consensus)
When Type 1 is unmasked, diagnosis of BrS requires 1 of: 1) Documented VT/VF2) Syncope of probable arrhythmic cause3) A family history of SCD with negative
autopsy 4) Type 1 ECG in family member5) Nocturnal agonal respiration
Brugada syndrome: diagnosis
The risk of VT/VF in patients diagnosed with this test is much lower than the risk in patients with spontaneous type 1
Genetic Defects Associated with BrSLocus Gene/Protein Ion Channel % of Probands
BrS1 3p21 SCN5A, Nav1.5 ↓ INa 11-28%BrS2 3p24 GPD1L ↓ INa RareBrS3 12p13.3 CACNA1C, Cav1.2 ↓ ICa 6.6%BrS4 10p12.33 CACNB2b, Cavß2b ↓ ICa 4.8%BrS5 19q13.1 SCN1B, Navß1 ↓ INa 1.1%BrS6 11q13-14 KCNE3, MiRP2 ↑ Ito RareBrS7 11q23.3 SCN3B, Navß3 ↓ INa RareBrS8 12p11.23 KCNJ8, Kir6.1 ↑ IK-ATP 2%BrS9 7q21.11 CACNA2D1, Cav2δ1 ↓ ICa 1.8%BrS10 1p13.2 KCND3, Kv4.3 ↑ Ito RareBrS11 17p13.1 RANGRF, MOG1 ↓ INa RareBrS12 3p21.2-p14.3 SLMAP ↓ INa RareBrS13 12p12.1 ABCC9, SUR2A ↑ IK-ATP RareBrS14 11q23 SCN2B, Navß2 ↓ INa RareBrS15 12p11 PKP2, Plakophillin-2 ↓ INa RareBrS16 3q28 FGF12, FHAF1 ↓ INa RareBrS17 3p22.2 SCN10A, Nav1.8 ↓ INa 5-16.7%BrS18 6q HEY2 (transcriptional factor) ↑ INa RareBrS19 1p36.3 KCNAB2, Kvβ2 ↑ Ito Rare
In phenotype positive patients: the yield of genetic testing is 20% to 30%.
Brugada syndrome: Genetics
Genetic Defects Associated with BrS
Locus Gene/Protein
BrS1 3p21 SCN5A, Nav1.5BrS2 3p24 GPD1LBrS3 12p13.3 CACNA1C, Cav1.2BrS4 10p12.33 CACNB2b, Cavß2bBrS5 19q13.1 SCN1B, Navß1BrS6 11q13-14 KCNE3, MiRP2BrS7 11q23.3 SCN3B, Navß3BrS8 12p11.23 KCNJ8, Kir6.1BrS9 7q21.11 CACNA2D1, Cav2δ1BrS10 1p13.2 KCND3, Kv4.3BrS11 17p13.1 RANGRF, MOG1BrS12 3p21.2-
p14.3SLMAP
BrS13 12p12.1 ABCC9, SUR2ABrS14 11q23 SCN2B, Navß2BrS15 12p11 PKP2, Plakophillin-2BrS16 3q28 FGF12, FHAF1BrS17 3p22.2 SCN10A, Nav1.8BrS18 6q HEY2 (transcriptional
factor)
BrS19 1p36.3 KCNAB2, Kvβ2
Utilizing NIH’S Clinical Genome Resources (ClinGen) criteria:
Only the SCN5A gene is classified as having definitive evidence as a cause for BrS
The other genes: may be causative or contribute.Limited or disputed evidence
Hosseini et al, Circulation, 2018
Le Scouarnec et al, Hum Mol Gen 2015Kapplinger et al, Circ Card Gen 2015
Proven causative gene(s)
Continuous debates…
Genotype status is not correlated with the risk of adverse events
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAl-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Genotype: risk of VT/VF, prognosis, and treatment in Brugada syndrome
Genotype status does not influence prognosis or treatment
ESC Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDPriori et al, Eur Heart J, 2015
Currently:
In patients with Brugada Syndrome, genetic testing may be useful to facilitate cascade screening of relatives
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAl-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
• Prevalence: 1:1,000 to 1:10,000
• More often in Asian vs. Whites or Blacks ( ̴ 8 : 1)
• Mean age of first arrhythmic event is 41±15 years
• Arrhythmic events: usually at rest or steeping
• Fever promotes arrhythmic events
• More often in male vs. female ( ̴ 10 : 1)
Brugada syndrome: Facts/statistics:
In patients with BrS (n= 678; Males = 91%):An SCN5A mutation: in females = 48%
in males = 28% (P = .007) The history of SCD is similar and inducibility of VT/VF is lower in
females vs. males. Milman et al, Heart Rhythm, 2018
Critical factors other than SCN5A mutation may determine phenotype and VT/VF in BrS
Brugada syndrome: Gender differences
BrS is more often in male vs. female ( ̴ 10 : 1)
Electrophysiological mechanism of VF in Brugada syndrome: Depolarization vs. repolarization hypotheses:
Support “depolarization”:1) Most BrS patients have some
form of conduction abnormalities (due to sodium channel mutation and/or structural alterations).
2) INa blockers unmask BrS
Support “repolarization”:1) VT/VF starts at bradycardia2) ST segment elevation is reduced
with acceleration of heart rate3) Experimental data
Not mutually exclusive
Fish & Antzelevitch, Heart Rhythm, 2004
Canine LV wedge preparation
Imbalance between inward and outward currents during early repolarization: lost of dome
Caused by: Sodium channel blockCalcium channel blockIto or IK(ATP) augmentation
Repolarization hypothesis
Recommended:• ICD in patients with
history of SCA/syncope
• Quinidine or ablation. In addition to ICD or instead of ICD
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAl-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Brugada syndrome: treatment
“ER” was first described in 1936 Shipley and Hallaran, Am Heart J, 1936
The term “J wave” (or Osborn’s wave) was introduced in 1953.
Osborn, Am J Physiol, 1953
Before 2008: “ER” - benign
ER Pattern can be malignant: First case report in 1984 Otto et al, Ann Intern Med, 1984Predicted in 2000 (largely based on experimental data).Gussak and Anzelevitch, J Electrocardiol, 2000.
Confirmed clinically in 2008.Haissaguerre et al, NEJM 2008Nam et al, NEJM, 2008Rosso et al, JACC, 2008+ many other studies in 2009-2018.
Haissaguerre et al, NEJM 2008
Baseline
Early repolarization (ER) syndrome
• A J-wave: notch and/or slur at the end of QRS• J-peak ≥ 0.1 mV in ≥ 2 contiguous leads of the 12-lead ECG
(excluding V1–V3). • ST segment elevation is not a required criterion
Early repolarization (ER) pattern
J-peak J-peak
Consensus (MacFarlane et al, JACC 2015)
“Horizontal” and “descending” are more likely to be associated with worse prognosis than “ascending”
ER syndrome: ST segment configuration
Tikkanen et al, Circ 2011Rosso et al, Heart Rhythm,2012
Antzelevitch et al. Heart Rhythm 2016. (J wave syndrome consensus)
High prevalence of ER Pattern!in 2 to 31%; up to 40-90% in athletes
Low risk of VT/VF in ER PatternAbsolute risk difference – 0.0007% per year
Wu et al, JACC 2013
The risk of VT/VF increases when:- Jpoint ≥ 0.2 mV and/or - inferior and lateral leads
Tikkanen et al, NEJM 2009; Rosso et al, JACC 2008
Early repolarization (ER) pattern
ER pattern is not necessarily ER syndrome
ER Syndrome:ER pattern in the inferior and/or lateral leads with history of aborted cardiac arrest, documented VT/VF
J wave syndrome consensus:Antzelevitch et al. Heart Rhythm 2016.
ER pattern and VT/VF: Race differences
• ER pattern is more prevalent in Blacks than Asians and Whites
• But ER pattern is associated with SCD in Asians and Whites but not Blacks
Olson et al Eur Heart J 2011, Perez et al, Heart Rhythm, 2012; Kelly et al Am J Card, 2018.
Why? Unknown
Genetic Defects Associated with ERSLocus Gene/Protein Ion Channel % of
Probands
ERS1 12p11.23 KCNJ8, Kir6.1 ↑IK-ATP Rare
ERS2 12p13.3 CACNA1C, Cav1.2 ↓ ICa 4.1%
ERS3 10p12.33 CACNB2b, Cavß2b ↓ ICa 8.3%
ERS4 7q21.11 CACNA2D1, Cav2δ1 ↓ ICa 4.1%
ERS5 12p12.1 ABCC9, SUR2A ↑ IK-ATP Rare
ERS6 3p21 SCN5A, Nav1.5 ↓ INa Rare
ERS7 3p22.2 SCN10A, Nav1.8 ↓ INa Rare
In phenotype positive patients with history of SCA/Syncope: the yield of genetic testing is ̴ 15%
• Genetic testing has not reliably identified mutation predisposing to ER
• Genetic testing is not recommended
ER syndrome: Genetics
Al-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018, GuidelinesPriori et al. Eur Heart J, 2015, Guidelines
Mechanisms of J wave:1) Transmural difference
in the early repolarization phase (dominant)
2) Conduction abnormalities
Yan&Antzelevitch, Circulation, 1996
Electrophysiological mechanism of ER Pattern
Canine LV wedge preparation.
Early repolarization syndrome: Treatment
Recommended: ICD in patients with ER pattern and history of SCA/VT
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAL-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Poorly defined
Antzelevitch, 2016
First described in Kangaroos in 1986. Kangaroos have short QT interval and a high rate of SCD.
O’Rourke et al Card Res 1986
First documented case of SCD in patients with short QT in 2000. Heritable short QT.
Gussak et al, Cardiology, 2000. Gollob et al, JACC 2011
Short-QT syndrome (SQTS)
1) QTc ≤ 340 ms with or without symptoms
2) QTc ≤ 360 ms if: • History of VT/VF in the absence of other heart diseases• Family history of SQTS, • Family history of unexplained SCD at age ≤ 40; or • A confirmed pathogenic mutation
ESC Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDPriori et al, Eur Heart J, 2015
Short-QT syndrome: Diagnosis
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAL-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Risk of VT/VF is not associated with the degree of QTc shortening Mezzanti et al, JCE 2018
Short-QT syndrome: Genetics
Genetic Defects Associated with SQTS
Gene Ion Channel % of Probands
SQT1 KCNH2 ↑IKr ̴ 10-15%
SQT1 KCNQ1 ↑IKs <1%
SQT3 KCNJ2 ↑IK1 <1%
SQT4 CACNA1C ↓ ICa <1%
SQT5 CACNB2B ↓ ICa <1%
SQT6 CACNA2D1 ↓ ICa <1%
Only about 200 individuals (50 families) with SQTS worldwide (2017; SQTS + history of SCA/syncope)
• Genotyping may help to confirm SQTS diagnosis • Value of genotyping for the risk of VT/VF and for therapy or
prognosis: Poorly defined
In phenotype positive patients with history of SCA/Syncope: the yield of genetic testing is 10% to 20%.
Mezzanti et al, JCE 2018
Short-QT syndrome (SQTS): treatment
Recommended: 1) ICD in patients history of SCA/VT
2) Quinidine or isoproterenol in patients with history of SCA/VT
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAL-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT)
CPVT was first recognized in 1960
Bidirectional VT
Diagnosis:• Baseline ECG is normal• No structural heart disease • Exercise stress: bidirectional or
polymorphic VT
Priori et al, ESC Guidelines, Eur Heart J 2015
• Genetic testing may be useful to confirm the diagnosis of CPVT • Therapy for CPVT is not guided by genotype status
Gollob, Appl Clin Gen, 2015
CPVT: Genetics
The yield of genetic testing is ̴ 60-65% in CPVT phenotype positive patients
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAL-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
• Prevalence 1: 10,000
• SCA/SCD is reported in 3-13% of CPVT patients
• VT/VF typically occur during exercise or at times of emotional stress
CPVT: Facts/Statistics
Electrophysiological mechanisms of CPVT-induced VT/VF
Canine LV wedge preparation: An experimental model of CPVT
Nam et al Circ, 2005
Intracellular Ca -mediated delay afterdelarization (DAD)
CPVT is caused by intracellular Ca2+
abnormalities –involving sarcoplasmic reticulum
CPVT: treatment
Recommended: • β Blockers• In addition to β-blocker therapy: flecainide, left cardiac
sympathetic denervation, and/or ICD
AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines: Ventricular arrhythmias/SCDAL-Khatib et al, JACC, 2018
Cause(s) of VT/VF in patients with Channelopahties
Genetics• Monogenic• Oligogenic• Poligenic
Environment
Epigenetics
Lahrouchi et al JACC 2017
13%
A panel of 77 channelopathy and cardiomyopathy genesMean age = 24 years; 1-65 years; Mostly European ancestry.
Mostly: CPVT - 6%LQTS - 4%
Applying American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) consensus guidelines (2015):
Current “contribution” of channelopathies in sudden arrhythmic death in population with “normal” heart
Post-mortem
Ischemic heart disease ̴70-80%Genetic heart disease ̴ 2-10% (???)
Contribution of genetic heart diseases (GHD) to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in general population
Common genetic variants do not appear to contribute significantly to SCA in the general populationNo common genetic variants were associated with SCAThe largest Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) in the genomics of SCA in general population Plus - Candidate gene analysis (54 inherited arrhythmia genes)
Geri et al, Resuscitation, 2017; Napolitano et al, Cur Opin Card, 2018
Ashar et al, Eur Heart J, 2018 (in press)
Rare “private” mutations can cause/contribute to SCA in LQTS, CPVT, BrS, HCM, DCM, etc. (in family-based studies) Most mutations are “private” (i.e., unique to the family)
Conclusions:
• Genetic abnormalities in the cardiac ion channels and their regulatory proteins may cause or contribute to the risk of VT/VF in patients with LQTS, CPVT, BrS, SQTS, and ERS.
• Currently, genotyping has therapeutic and prognostic values for long QTS patients.
• Genotyping may be useful for diagnosis of CPVT, BrS, and SQTS.
Thank you
Private mutation: A rare gene mutation that is usually found only in a single family or a small population. A private mutation occurs and is passed to a few family members, but not to future generations.