challenges in inter-operator network and service...
TRANSCRIPT
Challenges in Inter-Operator Network and Service Management
Hiroyuki OkazakiNetwork Laboratories, NEC Europe Ltd.
Heidelberg, [email protected]
© NEC Corporation 2002
Why is Inter-Operator Management a European Problem?
• Pan-European services– The economical and political integration of the
European Union leads to a need for pan-European services
– Is not unique to Telecom, but also banking industry etc. faces this challenge
• Each European Country had one state owned large Telecom Company– Are not used to cooperate– Are not willing to cooperate– Do compete but also need to
collaborate at the same time
© NEC Corporation 2002
European PNO Situation
• Traditionally, single (state-run) PNO per country
• De-regulation leads to a lot of competition within the countries
• However, despite several PNO mergers, take-overs and alliances, most providers and alliances still cover only a small number of countries (exceptions: Vodaphone, Worldcom, ...)
© NEC Corporation 2002
Services
• Potential Pan-European services– International leased lines– international VPNs– support for roaming user
• They can be only realized as
Multi-Provider Services
© NEC Corporation 2002
Technical Challenges for Multi-Provider Services
• Integration of individual business models• Managed network interconnection
– NNI interface– X interface
• OSS interconnection– FCAPS
• Roaming– User (e.g. IP VPN)– Terminal (e.g. GSM)
© NEC Corporation 2002
Problems of Inter-domain Network and Service Management
• Different business models of participating PNOs– different usage charging: per byte, per peak rate, per mean
rate, ...– different tariffs– different tariff changes per hour/day
• Different QoS technologies– DiffServ, MPLS with shaping, …
• Information about each participating network required– performance– resource availability– service tariffs– event notifications– Providers hesitate to provide this
kind of information to competitors
© NEC Corporation 2002
Inter-Domain Interface Design
• Inter-domain interfaces must be designed carefully– Disclosing as little domain-internal information as
possible (but at the same time as much as required) to other domains
– Modeling information rather general:• business model• charging scheme• QoS guarantees• resource availability• fault or other event notifications
– Alignment functions might be required• Consequence: Inter-domain interfaces can hardly
re-use intra-domain interfaces
© NEC Corporation 2002
R&D Institutions in Europe
• ETSI– European standardization body
• Eurescom– Owned by the large Telecom companies– Performs pre-market studies and joint technology
development and evaluation
• EU IST Research Program– European Union funded university and company
research
© NEC Corporation 2002
GSM Standardization at ETSI
• European 2G and 2.5G standardization– Not just technology, also business
models were harmonized– Inter-provider roaming integrated
• at an early stage of technology development
– Inter-provider interfaces for accounting & charging available
– Alliances and mergers between different providers are technically simple
© NEC Corporation 2002
EURESCOM Projects (1)
• P805 / P914: Internet Roaming (1998-2000)
– Goal: Study realization of Internet roaming using local telephone access
– Issues:• PNO characteristics
– terminal characteristic – access network interface– different customer
management
• Accounting
– Result: Framework for several currently available roaming services
• P811 / P908: OSS Interconnection (1998-2000)
– Goal: Reference framework for interconnecting OSS systems of different PNOs
– Issues:• Number portability• Charging & Accounting• Carrier Pre-Selection
• Infrastructure Capacity Ordering
• OSS interconnection gateways
– Participation of gateway manufacturers.
© NEC Corporation 2002
EURESCOM Projects (2)
• P813: ATM Services (1998-99)
– Goal: Enable Pan-European ATM services
– Required: specifications of inter-PNO NNI and X interfaces for
• service provisioning• interoperable management• repair, configuration and
security
– Problem: Modeling of information exchanged between different PNOs:
• providers want to reveal as little internal information as possible
– Result: Interfaces standardized by ETSI,but never realized
• P806 / P1008 / P1103 Inter-Operator IP QoSFramework (1998- )
– Goals:• Common and harmonized QoS
Framework• Inter-operator QoS interfaces• VoIP and UMTS case studies
– Issues• DiffServ QoS• SLA negotiation and
provisioning• Cost models and business
models• Accounting and billing
– Results: Guidelines for UMTS inter-operator VoIP services
© NEC Corporation 2002
EU IST InterMon
• Goal: Designing and implementing a system for monitoring IP-based inter-domain services with QoS requirements.
• 12 partners, including Deutsche Telekom, Telefonica, Telecom Italia, Siemens, NEC
• Issues: – modeling & visualization
of inter-domain traffic– modeling of
per-domain QoS• Expected results
– inter-domain trafficmodel and simulator
– traffic monitoring toolkit (led by NEC)
– traffic database andvisualization tools
end user
network provider 1
service provider
Domain 1
Domain 2Service X
owns
uses
provides
network provider 2
owns
© NEC Corporation 2002
Examples of INTERMON inter-domain services/applications
• SLA (Service Level Agreement) validation for traffic crossing different domains (e.g. losses, delay, jitter within agreed limits).
• Traffic engineering: e.g. reconfigure BGP path selection algorithms based on increased knowledge of the AS level inter-domain connectivity and of current status in neighboring domains
• Network planning: dimensioning of inter-domain links and border routers.
• Usage-based accounting/charging
© NEC Corporation 2002
INTERMON main components
Measurements toolkit(traffic volume, end-to-end traffic performance, inter-domain traffic performance, event detection)
Modelling & Simulation toolkit(traffic and topology models)
Visual Data Mining toolkit(GUI for end user, network operator, service provider, data mining functions etc)
INTERMON database
© NEC Corporation 2002
INTERMON architecture (current proposal)
Tools
Adapters
ISP localInterMon DB
MeasurementData
Collection
Tool Configurationand Control
Task processing Access (AAA)
INTERMONDB
Client Client Client ClientClients
Visualization
Simulation Modelling Data mining
AccessRouter
MonitoringProve
AccessServerr
Topology Detector
ProcessingGroup
CoreGroup
© NEC Corporation 2002
Conclusions
• The European telecommunications market shows a large number of locally operating PNOs
• The economical and political integration of Europe requires inter-operator service provisioning more than in many other regions
• The big challenge is Offering Pan-European Multi-Provider Services
• ETSI, Eurescom, and EU-funded research are attacking the problem
• Focus shifted from PSTN and ATM towards IP and UMTS inter-domain services
• First results are available: GSM standard, roaming service, UMTSguidelines, ...
• Still, there is a lot of work ahead: modeling and alignment of – business model, charging schemes,– QoS guarantees, resource availability, – fault or other event notifications,
and standardization of inter-domain interfaces.