challenges for material and component development for … · challenges for material and component...
TRANSCRIPT
Mitg
lied
der H
elm
holtz
-Gem
eins
chaf
t
Institute of Energy and Climate Research IEK-3: Electrochemical Process Engineering
Challenges for material and component development for PEM fuel cells
W. Lehnert1,2, H. Janßen1, J. Supra1, V. Weißbecker1
1 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Germany 2 RWTH, Aachen University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Germany
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Outline
• Interaction between bipolar plate
and GDL, some challenges
• Graphitic vers. metallic bipolar plates, thermal mangement
• Corrosion
• Gaskets
Material - Metallic - graphitic
GDL / flowfield - Geometry - Pressure drop
Gasket - Elastic - incompressible
Thermal management - Air - liquid
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Polarization curves / different BiP design
Polarization curve for different channel/rib geometries
Ch. Hartnig, L. Jörissen, J. Kerres, W. Lehnert, J. Scholta, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), in: Materials for Fuel Cells, Ed. M. Gasik, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2008, pp 101-184
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
• different gas diffusion layers • same flowfield
Polarization curves / different GDLs
Membrane: Gore 5510
p anode ambient p cathode ambient
Humidification anode dry cathode recirculation Stacktemperature 48 °C
Stoichiometry: λ anode 1,1 λ cathode 4,0
number of cells: 1 active area [cm²]: 126
C. Hartnig, L. Jörissen, J. Scholta, W. Lehnert, Gas diffusion media, flowfields and system aspects in low temperature fuel cells. In: C. Hartnig, C. Roth, Polymer electrolyte membrane and direct methanol fuel cell technology, Volume 1: Fundamentals and performance of low temperature fuel cells, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2012, pp 81-116
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Bipolar Plates
Requirements for Bipolar Plates • High electronic conductivity. • Low interfacial contact resistance to the GDL. • Providing a flow path for gas transport with low pressure drop but uniform distribution over the cell
area. • Providing mechanical strength and rigidity. • Providing thermal conduction in order to regulate the thermal management. • Has to be corrosion resistant.
some material properties graphitic BiP metallic BiP • thermal conductivity / W m-1 K-1 : ~ 20 – 50 ~ 15 – 60 e.g. 1.4301 (FeCr18Ni10): 15 • density / g cm-3 : ~ 1.9 ~ 7.9 (1.4301)
• spec. electr. resistivity / Ω mm2 m-1: ~ 10 ~ 0.73 (1.4301) • electric conductivity / S m-1: ~ 1∙105 ~ 1.4 ∙106
for comparison: Cu: 400 W m-1 K-1 Al: 235 W m-1 K-1 Cu: 0.017 Ω mm2 m-1 Al: 0.027 Ω mm2 m-1 [Ω mm2 m-1 = 10-6 Ωm]
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Gas Diffusion Layers
Requirements for Gas Diffusion Layers • High electronic conductivity. • Heat must be transported through the material. Therefore a high heat conductivity is desirable. • Mechanically supporting the MEA. • The GDL should provide gas access from the flow-field channels to the catalyst layer and
allow removal of gaseous products. • The GDL should provide a passage for water removal from the electrode to the flow field.
some material properties of GDLs w/o MPL (material unisotropic, compression dependent) • effective thermal conductivity, xy (z): ~ 1 – (15) W m-1 K-1 • density: ~ 0.4 – 0.45 g cm-3
• electrical resistivity (through plane): < 12 mΩ cm²
• porosity ~ 78 - 85% • Air permeability ~ 20 – 200 cm³ cm-2 s-1
[1] Data sheet Freudenberg FCCT SE & Co. KG [2] Data sheet SGL TECHNOLOGIES GmbH [3] Data sheet Toray Industries
Teertstra et al. , Electrochimica Acta 56 (2011) 1670–1675 Sadegh et al. , J.Power Sources 196 (2011) 246–254, JPS 196 (2011) 3565–3571
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Interaction between BiP / GDL
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
ε = 0,7 ε = 0,5 ε = 0,3 ε = 0,2
Influence of GDL thickness on fuel cell behaviour (idealized case)
0.6 V; porosity 0.7; channel width: 1mm; rib width: 1 mm; (only valid for specified flowfield)
curr
ent d
ensi
ty /
mA
cm-2
GDL thickness / µm
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
uncompressed compressed too much compression (e.g. stiff paper)
Membrane Electrode Gas diffusion layer
channel
land
Cross section of a cell
GDL compression (the truth)
Figure left: Ch. Hartnig, L. Jörissen, J. Kerres, W. Lehnert, J. Scholta, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), in: Materials for Fuel Cells, Ed. M. Gasik, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2008, pp 101-184
compression under the lands uncompressed under the channel
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
GDL morphology underneath channel and land area
compression [%]
aver
age
poro
sity
Compression rate : 30%
Compression rate : 10%
Compression rate : 0%
compression [%]
thic
knes
s µm
Ch. Tötzke, G. Gaiselmann, I. Manke, A. Hilger, T. Arlt, H. Markötter, F. Wieder, M. Osenberg, J. Bohner, W. Lehnert, V. Schmidt, A. Kupsch, B.R. Müller, J. Banhart; Synchrotron tomographic study on the inhomogeneous compression of gas diffusion layers in fuel cells, ModVal 10 19.-20.03.2013 Bad Boll/Stuttgart
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Influence of GDL on pressure drop
F. Liu, M. Kvesić, K. Wippermann, U. Reimer, W. Lehnert Effect of Gas Distribution on Performance and Durability of HT-PEFCs Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 160 (8) F892-F897 (2013)
Serpentine and spiral flow field plates. Both flow fields have an identical land width, and channel width and depth: 1.0 mm.
Pressure drop in the flow fields with and without GDL
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Thermal management
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Thermal management
Influence of the bipolarplate material on thermal management
Graphitic BIP Metallic BIP
Influence • of geometry → hydraulic diameter • of different contact area between BiP and GDL • of thermal conductivity • of thickness of the material
• channel depth: depending on the width • thermal conductivity of steel: λ=15-60 W m-1 K-1
• thickness of the material: < 0,2 mm
• flexible geometry • thermal conductivity of graphite/phenolic resin-
composit: λ=20-50 W m-1 K-1 • thickness of the material: ≥ 1 mm
http://www.graebener-maschinentechnik.de
www.reinz.com
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
3D-CFD simulation: thermal management
Graphitic BIP Metallic BIP
0.2 mm
3 mm
cooling channel anode gas channel
cathode gas channel
5 m
m
6 mm cathode gas channel
anode gas channel
cooling channel
GDL
2 mm 1.5 mm
CFD model: • 2 cooling channels L=100mm • homogeneous heat source on GDL: �̇�=0,75 W cm-2 • hydrogen / air operation: λH2/Air=2/2 ; Tin,H2/Air=160°C • cooling media: air (Tin =27°C, �̇�𝑎𝑎𝑎 = 3 ∙ 10−6 kg s−1cm−21) or
heat transfer fluid (Tin =160°C, �̇�𝑙𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑙 = 3.3 ∙ 10−5 kg s−1cm−2 1) 1 per cm2 GDL area
not to scale possible geometries different hydraulic diameter
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
3D-CFD simulation: Temperature distribution on cathode GDL
Simulated temperature distribution for a HT-PEFC, air-liquid cooled
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Corrosion
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Challenges of metallic BiP
Metallic BiP
Poisoning of membrane and catalyst
Blocking of functional groups in PEM and/or the catalyst due to metal ion release. Decrease of performance
Corrosion
wet / acidic environment (NT-TEM, HT-PEM and impact of T) Potential
Passivation
Formation of non-conductive passivation layers on metal surface (metale oxides/phosphates) Rise of interfacial contact resistance
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Corrosion rates with polarization
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
j / µA∙cm
-2
η / V
1.43011.43721.44041.4571
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
j / µA∙cm
-2
η / V
1.45391.48762.48562.4869
Stainless Steels: - jcor = 45 µA∙cm-2 (current at Ecor) - Passive region (0.2 – 1.0 V): j = 31 µA∙cm-2
Alloys: - 2.4869 (Cr20Ni80): best performance - jcor = 0,7 µA∙cm-2 - Passive region: 16 µA∙cm-2 (at 0.6 V)
85 wt. % H3PO4 at 130 °C
Fe ~ 65 %
85 wt. % H3PO4 at 130 °C
Fe < 50 %
DOE: Corrosion rate < 1 µA∙cm-2
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Possibility of Corrosion Protection
Metallic BiP
Stainless steels/alloys
- High Cr and Ni content with addings of Mo, Nb, W, Ta, La, Zr,Cu
Passivation layer
Cr/Ni
Metallic materials - Noble metals with - Metals with conduct. and stable oxide layer (Ti, Nb, Ta) Costs
Coating Surface treatment Bare substrates
- Enrichment of Cr on metal surface using pack cementation process (Cr oxide layers on substrate) - Thermal nitriding (CrN on surface)
Interfacial contact resistance
- Thin gold layers - Ceramic coatings - Cladding with Nb - Graphitic, diamond-like coatings - Polymeres (Polypyrrole,
Polyaniline) Costs, Defects and stability of
coating
metallic BiP should be coated
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Coatings for Metallic BiP
Requirements for coatings • High electronic and thermal conductivity • Corrosion resistant, also under polarization • Impermeable to electrolyte • Heat-resistant (180 °C, HT-PEM) • Adequate adhesion on substrate • Free of defects (cracks, pinholes,…) • Should be flexible according to thermal expansion of metallic substrate at elevated temp.
Constrains of coatings • Corrosion values vary strongly in literature (as a function of pH, T, material composition,
surface finishing, accomplishment of experiments,…) • Missing of long-term results • Most promising results for nitriding and CrN, TiN (for NT-PEM) • Main challenges are defect-free coatings and costs • More results and publications for NT-PEM than for HT-PEM
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Gaskets
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Gaskets
Requirements for Gaskets • Sealing of stack components to avoid crossover and leakage of fluids • Compensation of tolerances (manufacturing inaccuracy, stack deflection, thermal
expansion) • Functionality must be fulfilled under operation and at standstill for the announced
stack lifetime
Material properties of gaskets • Electric conductivity < 5 µS cm-1
• H2 permeability < 2 • 10-6 cm³ s-1 cm-2 • Temperature stability > 100 °C (PEFC), > 200 °C (HT-PEFC) • Chemical resistance Reformate (H2), air (O2), H3PO4, cooling media
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Gaskets - Requirements
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Gasket materials
temp. range chem. resistance Elastomer Silicone -60 °C…(200) °C oil, water, ozone Fluorocarbon (FKM) -15 °C…200 °C (silicone) oil, ozone Fluorosilicone -60 °C…220 °C (silicone) oil, water, petrol Perfluoroelastomer (FFKM) -15 °C…310 °C solvents, steam, water Thermoplastic Perfluoroalkoxyalkan (PFA) -200 °C…260 °C hydrocarbons, petrol Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) -70 °C…260 °C hydrocarbons, aromatics, water, steam, coolant Polyimide (PI) -240 °C…280 °C oil, org. solvents
Compression: „Incompressible“ gasket Hardstop functionality by the gasket material „elastic“ gasket Hardstop functionality by the BIP construction
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
The selected examples show: that the interaction of the cell components have to be taken into account. • mechanical properties
• chemical properties
• transport properties have to be adjusted carefully in order to design proper cells and stacks.
Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering
Thank you for your attention
Mathematik und Industrie www.mathematik-21.de